No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westminster Village - West Lafayette

2741 N Salisbury St, West Lafayette, IN 47906 · Non profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (765) 463-7546 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$72,545 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $72,545 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-21)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
512 Sagamore Pkwy W · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1000 Sagamore Pkwy W · (765) 497-2300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Pay Less0.2 mi
1032 Sagamore Pkwy W · (765) 463-1556 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wilshire Ave · (765) 775-5110 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
620 Cumberland Ave · (765) 463-3455

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.8%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.9%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.3%11.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.2%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.1%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.761.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.611.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
81.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 81.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.8%CMS range 60.1–71.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.9–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge81.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge77.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.4–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
39.3%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 64.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.60 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-21)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified immediately and on-call services were utilized when a resident had a change of condition for 1 of 3 discharged residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 67) Resident 67 was admitted to the hospital with a bowel obstruction, perforated bowel, and necrosis. The resident required surgical intervention and subsequently died.The immediate jeopardy began, on [DATE] around 9:40 p.m., when Resident 67 had a change of condition which included, a complaint of constipation with ongoing diarrhea, increased pain, shortness of breath, loss of bowel sounds, and excessive belching. RN 2 faxed the physician's office at this time. On [DATE] at 1:58 a.m., Resident 67 was yelling out about abdominal pain and excessive belching. RN 3's assessment noted hypoactive bowel sounds. There was no documentation RN 3 contacted a physician. At 3:14 p.m., RN 4's assessment noted shortness of breath, verbal difficulty finishing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident's representative was provided in writing the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 64, 67 and 3)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 1/15/26 at 9:57 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary edema, supraventricular tachycardia, respiratory failure with hypoxia, combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A nursing progress note, dated 9/21/25 at 10:45 p.m., indicated the resident was sent to the emergency room for increased shortness of breath. A nursing progress note, dated 9/25/25 at 4:18 p.m., indicated the resident returned to the facility after a hospital stay for shortness of breath and exacerbation of congestive heart failure. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record to indicate the resident or resident's representative was provided with information in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when the resident had a new mental health diagnosis and was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Residents 5)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 1/15/26 at 12:27 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, congestive heart failure, dementia, and hypertension.A physician's order, dated 11/05/25, indicated to administer Rexulti (an atypical antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg (milligram) one tablet in the morning related to anxiety disorder. A physician's order, dated 11/05/25, indicated to administer buspirone (an anxiolytic medication) 0.5 mg (milligram) one tablet two times a day. A care plan, dated as revised 12/18/25, indicated the resident was at risk for anxious mood as evidenced by becoming fidgety, restless, tearful, anxious, and agitated. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administering medication as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 9)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 1/15/26 at 11:33 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure (CHF), dementia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder.A physician's order, dated 6/28/25, indicated to obtain a post void daily weight in the morning, before breakfast, while wearing pajamas, and to notify the physician if the resident had a two (2) pound weight gain in 24 hours or a five (5) pound or more weight gain in one (1) week. a. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 10/1/25 to 10/31/25, indicated the daily weights were not documented on 10/10/25, 10/18/25, 10/22/25, and 10/29/25.On 10/27/25, Resident 9 had a weight gain of 2.8 pounds.b. The MAR, dated 11/1/25 to 11/30/25, indicated the daily weights were not documented on 11/5/25, 11/7/25, 11/12/25, and 11/25/25.On 11/28/25, Resident 9 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior and side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications, wound care treatments, and catheter care were documented for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for documentation. (Resident 18, 33, 20 and 12) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 2/24/25 at 10:17 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with anxiety, mood disturbance, psychotic disturbance, anxiety disorder, depression, and delusional disorder. A physician's order, dated 2/15/24, indicated to monitor for side effects of antianxiety medication three times a day. a. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 1/2025, indicated antianxiety medication side effect monitoring was not documented each shift on 1/1/25, 1/9/25, 1/12/25, 1/24/25 and 1/29/25. b. The MAR, dated 2/2025, indicated anti-anxiety medication side effect monitoring was not documented each shift on 2/16/25 and 2/18/24. A physician's order, dated 2/15/24, indicated to monitor side effects of antidepressant medication three times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the physician's ordered medication parameters were followed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 45 and 33) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 2/24/25 at 11:46 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema and atrial fibrillation. A care plan, dated 7/17/24, indicated Resident 45 had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and chronic end stage renal failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, give medications as ordered. A physician's order, dated 7/22/24, indicated to give metoprolol (a blood pressure medication) 12.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily with instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure of less than 100 or a heart rate of less than 60. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/1/24 through 11/30/24, indicated metoprolol was administered: a. On 11/7/24, in the morning with a heart rate of 56. b. On 11/15/24, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed and therapy evaluations were completed in a timely manner for 2 of 4 residents review for position and mobility. (Resident 51 and 9) Findings include: During an observation, on 2/19/25 at 12:09 p.m., Resident 51 was in the dining room with her wheelchair pushed away from the table. The resident was leaning forward with her left arm dangling below the wheelchair seat. During an observation, on 2/19/25 at 3:08 p.m., the resident was sitting next to the nurse's station with her eyes closed. The resident was leaning forward and sitting crooked in her wheelchair. During an observation, on 2/20/25 at 10:27 a.m., the resident was sitting next to the nurse's office in her wheelchair. The resident was leaning forward trying to touch her left shoe. The nurse was sitting at the desk in the nurse's office with her back facing the resident and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assisting residents out of the dining room. During an observation, on 2/21/25 at 10:49 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff initiated new person-centered dementia care interventions for residents with wandering behaviors and to check wanderguard placement for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident B and C) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/19/25 at 1:35 p.m., Resident B was walking in the common area near the exit doors. During an observation, on 2/20/25 at 12:15 p.m., the resident was ambulating down the hall towards the exit doors. During an observation, on 2/21/25 at 1:54 p.m., the resident was ambulating back from the exit door on her unit. During an observation, on 2/24/25 at 9:06 a.m., the resident was sitting on the couch in the common area in front of the main entrance doors. During an observation, on 2/25/25 at 12:15 p.m., the resident was walking near the front entrance frequently looking at the doors. During an observation, on 2/25/25 at 2:05 p.m., the resident triggered the alarm on an exit door multiple times. The staff were redirecting her away from the door, but she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy provided gradual dose reduction (GDR) requests to reduce or discontinue psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 18, and 33) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 2/24/25 at 10:17 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with anxiety, mood disturbance, psychotic disturbance, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and delusional disorder. a. A physician's order, with an original start date of 11/15/23, indicated to give buspirone (a medication used to treat anxiety) 10 milligrams (mg) three times per day. The clinical record did not include a GDR consideration for buspirone. The facility was unable to provide a GDR consideration for buspirone. b. A physician's order, with an original start date of 11/15/23, indicated to give duloxetine (a medication used to treat depression) 60 mg each day. A consultant pharmacist physician recommendation form, dated 5/16/24, indicated it was time to consider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were provided for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/21/25 at 1:54 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, polyosteoarthritis, pure hyperglyceridemia, prediabetes, history of falling, and insomnia. An Informed Consent for Influenza Immunization, dated and signed on 10/9/24 at 4:43 p.m., indicated Resident B's representative gave permission for the influenza vaccination. An Informed Consent for Pneumococcal Immunization, dated and signed on 10/9/24 at 4:43 p.m., indicated Resident B's representative gave permission for the pneumococcal vaccination. An Immunization Report, dated 2/24/25, indicated the resident's last influenza vaccine was given on 9/27/23 and she had not received a pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview, on 2/25/25 at 4:20 p.m., Infection Preventionist (IP) 3 indicated the resident had received Tamiflu for an influenza exposure at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. During an observation, on 1/23/24 at 12:31 p.m., Resident 25 was observed, in her wheelchair, wearing open toe sandals with a small bandage on her left great toe. During an observation, on 1/26/24 at 11:17 a.m., the resident was sitting up, in her wheelchair, she had sandals on, and a small bandage was noted on her left great toe. The bandage was not dated and had some red drainage present. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 1/26/24 at 10:50 a.m. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, bell's palsy, osteoarthritis, and venous insufficiency. A physician's order, dated 1/18/24, indicated the resident may be seen by a wound doctor. A podiatrist note, dated 1/18/24, indicated the resident had non palpable pulses in her bilateral feet and edema was noted. The feet were dry, cool, rubor (red), and her nails were long, moderately thick, and discolored. There was no documentation of bleeding, or a small bandage being applied. A review of Resident 25's nursing progress notes, from 1/20/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received mouth care twice daily for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident 37) Finding includes: During an interview, on 1/22/24 at 2:22 p.m., Resident 37's wife indicated the resident had full upper dentures and a partial bottom denture anchored to his remaining natural teeth. The staff would forget to brush his teeth, the toothbrush was dry when she checked it, and she had observed food and debris on natural teeth. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 1/24/24 at 10:38 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) following cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, dysarthria (slurred speech) following cerebral infarction, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction. A care plan, dated 10/14/21, indicated the resident had a need for dental care related to having some permanent teeth, a lower partial, and full upper denture. The approaches included, but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all areas of the wireless call system were functioning properly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for call devices. (Residents 19 and 13) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 1/22/24 at 1:14 p.m., Resident 19 indicated sometimes call lights were not answered or could take a long time to be answered. He used his call pendant around his neck as his call light. During an observation and interview, on 1/22/24 at 1:45 p.m., Resident 19 pressed his call pendant around his neck. During an observation and interview, on 1/22/24 at 1:56 p.m., RN 2 indicated she did not know the resident's call light was pressed. She did not have a notification to her Vocera (wireless communication system staff members wore to receive call light notifications and talk to other staff). There was no indication the resident's call light was pressed per the call light monitor screen out in the hall. During an interview, on 1/22/24 at 1:58 p.m., RN 2 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure items were not stored on the floor in resident rooms, carpet squares edges were not peeling, and the walls were free of gouges for 4 of 4 rooms reviewed for environment. (Room A10, A9, A3 and C11D.) Findings include: 1a. During an observation, on 1/22/24 at 10:30 a.m., Room A10 had a small pile of magazines, two decorative boxes, and opened mail on the floor. 1b. During an observation, on 1/25/24 at 12:20 p.m., Room A10 had a large cardboard box with papers inside and opened mail stored on the floor. 2. During an observation, on 1/22/24 at 10:36 a.m., Room A9 had a grocery sack with the resident's personal items on the floor next to the window. 3. During an observation, on 1/22/24 at 2:51 p.m., Room A3 had four squares of carpet peeling up in the center of the four squares. 4. During an observation, on 1/22/24 at 3:49 p.m., Room C11D had a large area of gouges in the drywall and missing paint. During an interview, on 1/22/24 at 12:20 p.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 indicated the sack on the floor of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing was up to date and had the correct hours of staff nurses for 2 of 2 posted nurse staffing lists. (1/23/24 and 1/24/24) Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/24/24 at 3:25 p.m., the front door had staffing posted for 1/23/24. During an observation, on 1/24/24 at 3:40 p.m., the posted nurse staffing, dated 1/24/24, on the Terrace Unit indicated 2.5 nurses were scheduled for the 2:30 p.m., through 10:30 p.m., shift. During an interview, on 1/24/24 at 3:45 p.m., the Health Facility Administrator (HFA) indicated the staffing at the front door was not the correct date and the posted nurse staffing on the Terrace Unit did not have 2 and a half nurses working. There were 2 nurses working the entire shift and one nurse working a split shift. A current policy, titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated as revised on August 2022 and received from the Director of Nursing on 1/26/24 at 3:20 p.m., indicated .Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$72,545 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $72,545 — penalty dated 2026-01-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burcham Hills Retirement CenterEast Lansing, MI 1 of 5Cottage Grove PlaceCedar Rapids, IA 2 of 5Casa De Las CampanasSan Diego, CA 2 of 5Linn Manor Care CenterMarion, IA 2 of 5Oakton Place Health And Rehabilitation At The ArliNaples, FL 2 of 5Pavilion At Brandon WildeEvans, GA 2 of 5Signature PointeDallas, TX 2 of 5The Stewart Health CenterCharlotte, NC 3 of 5Carillon INCLubbock, TX 3 of 5Friendship Village Of TempeTempe, AZ 4 of 5Croasdaile VillageDurham, NC 4 of 5Dallas Retirement Village Health CenterDallas, OR 4 of 5Health Care Ctr At The Forum At Rancho San AntonioCupertino, CA 4 of 5Oaks Health Ctr At The Marshes Of Skidaway IslandSavannah, GA 4 of 5Parkwood VillageBedford, TX 4 of 5The Cedars of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 4 of 5Wesley Pines Retirement CommunityLumberton, NC 4 of 5Whitestone a Masonic and Eastern Star CommunityGreensboro, NC 5 of 5Acacia Health CenterPhoenix, AZ 5 of 5Avalon Health Care Center At StoneridgeMystic, CT 5 of 5Briarwood At Timber RidgeIssaquah, WA 5 of 5Chestnut Grn Hlth Ctr BlakehurTowson, MD 5 of 5Cypress Glen Retirement CommunityGreenville, NC 5 of 5Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv CtrMilwaukee, WI 5 of 5Essex Meadows Health CenterEssex, CT 5 of 5Friendship VillageKalamazoo, MI 5 of 5Green Hills Health Care CenterAmes, IA 5 of 5Greenwood Village SouthGreenwood, IN 5 of 5Hearthwood SNF Senior LivingBartlett, IL 5 of 5MarquetteIndianapolis, IN 5 of 5Premier Place At The GlenviewNaples, FL 5 of 5Radford GreenLincolnshire, IL 5 of 5Residences At Vantage PointColumbia, MD 5 of 5Rolling Green VillageGreenville, SC 5 of 5Somerfield At The HeritageBrentwood, TN 5 of 5Springs At Monarch Landing, TheNaperville, IL 5 of 5Terraces At The ClareChicago, IL 5 of 5The Arbour At Westminster ManorAustin, TX 5 of 5The Birches At Trillium WoodsPlymouth, MN 5 of 5The Preston Health CenterHilton Head Island, SC

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESTMINSTER VILLAGE WEST LAFAYETTE, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/23/2011
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 06/21/2021
DENO, BRADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2016
GENTRY, DONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2021
ROSE, MARIANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
SMITH, JANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2020
LONG, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
SULLIVAN, AGNESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
TASHJIAN GIBBS, MARCELLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
WILSON, ANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022
LIFE CARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
BLANKENSHIP, BENJAMINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/18/2019
DODT, KEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
LI, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
PATZ, KRISTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
THOMAS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 1%Medicare 17%Other / private 82%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,449per resident / day
operating cost
$44,042per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,194per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155177. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next