Residences At Vantage Point

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 19.4 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.55 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.66 to 1.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for medication regimen reviews, as evidenced by 1) failing to ensure that pharmacist identified irregularities reviewed by the attending physician, along with the action taken or not taken including rationale, was documented in the resident's medical record, and 2) failing to ensure medication irregularities were identified during monthly medication regimen reviews. This was evident for 4 (#6, #5,#16, #13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.The findings include: 1) On 3/11/26 at 2:45 PM, a review of Resident #6's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 1/31/26 physician order for Metoprolol (lowers blood pressure) ER (extended release) by mouth one time a day for hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure (BP)), hold for systolic (S) (top BP number) less than 110, or Pulse (P) less than 60 that documented Resident #6 received the Metoprolol every day in February. There was no documentation in the MAR to indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to reveal evidence that the resident or resident representative was informed of their right to formulate an advanced directive, and failed to ensure that a current copy of a resident's advance directive was in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 3 (#5, #12, #4) of 11 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The findings include: Advanced Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law related to provision of health care when the individual are not able to make their own decisions. 1) On 3/10/26 at 11:50 AM, a review of Resident #5's paper medical record failed to reveal an advance directive for Resident #5. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) on 3/13/26 at 11:07 AM revealedResident #5 resided in the SNF since March 2023, and no documentation was found in the EMR to indicate the resident had an advance directive, whether the resident/representative was informed of the right to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determine the facility staff failed to notify the physician when a resident was identified to have a significant weight loss. This was evident for 1(#13) of 5 residents reviewed for Nutrition.The findings include:Resident #13's medical record was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 1:12 PM. The resident's weight record in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed that on 12/5/25 the resident weighed 320 lbs.(pounds). No weights were recorded for January or February 2026. Resident #13's next documented weight was 3/4/26 by Staff #4 the MDS nurse. The resident's weight at that time was 281.8 lbs. It was checked and recorded again the next day 3/5/26, as 281.8 lbs. by Staff #6 an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). The weights obtained on 3/4/26 and 3/5/26 reflected a 38.2 lb. or 11.94% significant weight loss over 3 months. A weight change note was written on 3/5/26 by the DON (Director of Nursing) for Weight Warning and reflected Resident #13's significant weight loss and included Dietitian will address, will have him/her on weekly weight. A Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident person-centered care plans with measurable goals and interventions. This was evident for 1 (#18) of 3 resident's reviewed for respiratory care, and 2 (#6, #5) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: The MDS (Minimal Data Set) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1.) On 3/9/26 at 11:53 AM the surveyor observed Resident #18 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula (NC). A nasal cannula is a tube used to administer oxygen through the nose. The cannula was connected to an oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that each resident received necessary respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to administer oxygen at the prescribed rate, failing to assess and document the resident's immediate and ongoing need for, provision of and response to supplemental oxygen. This was evident for 1 (#18) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care.The findings include:On 3/9/26 at 11:53 AM the surveyor observed Resident #18 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula (NC) - a tube used to administer oxygen through the nose. The cannula was connected to an oxygen concentrator - a machine that concentrates and delivers oxygen from room air. The concentrator was set to deliver oxygen at 3 L/min (Liters per minute). Review of Resident #18's medical record on 3/13/26 at 11:21 AM revealed a physician's order for Oxygen at 2L/min via NC as needed for SOB (shortness of breath); not 3L/min as observed by the surveyor. The order for 2L/min was included on Resident #18's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the medical record and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician addressed a significant weight gain/weight loss. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 5 residents reviewed for weight gain/weight loss.The findings include:On 3/12/26 at 9:30 AM, a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed, in a weight tracking system report, Resident #3's weight was documented as 181 pounds on 2/24/26 and 195 pounds on 3/1/26, which was a 7.7 % weight gain in 8 days. Further, the record review revealed that the dietician did not document in the medical record that the resident had a 7.7% gain in 8 days, and no other follow-up was noted by the dietician in the medical record.Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal that the physician did not evaluate and addressed the resident's significant weight gain when it was identified. Progress notes were reviewed in the medical record on 3/9/2026, with no mention of a 7.7% weight gain for Resident #3.On 3/12/26 at 10:40 AM during an interview, the Administrator Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to follow physician orders to follow blood pressure and pulse parameters for administering a blood pressure medication. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 3/11/26 at 2:45 PM, a review of Resident #6's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 1/31/26 physician order for Metoprolol Succinate (lowers blood pressure) ER (extended release) tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure (BP)) and hold for systolic (S) (top number of BP) reading) less than 110, or Pulse (P) (heart rate) less than 60 that documented Resident #6 received the Metoprolol every day in February. There was no documentation in the MAR to indicate that prior to the administration of the metoprolol, Resident #6's BP and P were monitored and the metoprolol administered within the parameters of the physician's order. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to keep complete and accurate medical records. This was evident for 5 (#4, #12, #11,#18, #16) of 10 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives and 1 (#13) of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatment options based on a patient's wishes. It is valid in all healthcare facilities and programs throughout Maryland. Section 1 includes orders to Attempt CPR or No CPR. Included in the No CPR section are three options: A-1 Intubate; A-2 Do Not Intubate but comprehensive efforts may include limited ventilatory support by CPAP or BiPAP; or Option B No CPR, Palliative and Supportive Care. Section 2 to 9 have options for situations other than cardiopulmonary arrest. Per the MOLST instructions:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure respiratory care equipment was 1) properly date labeled, and 2) cleaned and stored as per the manufacturer's instructions. This was evident for 2 (#18 and #13) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care.The findings include: 1) On 3/9/26 at 11:53 AM the surveyor observed Resident #18 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula (NC) (a tube used to administer oxygen through the nose). The cannula was connected to an oxygen concentrator (a machine used to concentrate and deliver oxygen from room air). A piece of white tape was attached to the nasal cannula tubing with the date 3/1/26 in black marker. Another observation on 3/17/26 at 9:06 AM revealed Resident #18's nasal cannula tubing had no date label. On 3/17/26 at 10:45 AM Staff #7 an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed the resident in his/her room with the oxygen running via NC and confirmed the nasal cannula was not labeled. She indicated that she did not know why the tubing wasn't labeled. Review of Resident #18's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and facility record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food handling practices were followed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, ensure the dishwashing system met the required minimum temperatures and chemical concentration, ensure monitoring of dishwasher chemical concentration and food service equipment functioning, ensure thorough environmental cleaning of the kitchen, and ensure the monitoring of food temperatures and food storage. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 12/2/24 at 8:00AM during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchen the surveyor noted the following signage was present: Attention team! All food items must have the following: label, date, item covered. On 12/2/24 at 8:03AM during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchen the surveyor noted the following signage present on the facility's walk-in refrigerators/freezers: All product stored in this walk-in must be: covered, labeled, dated, any product…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD