Pavilion At Brandon Wilde

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 62.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.78 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were promptly resolved for five residents (Resident (R) 9) R23, R35, R50, and R61 of 22 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to date, summarize findings, and document corrective action taken as a result of the grievance. This failure had the potential to cause further grievances to be unresolved for residents throughout the facility. 1.Review of R23's ) revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' assessment, located under the ''MDS'' tab electronic medical record (EMR), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/26 revealed R23's admission date was 08/26/25. R23 had a diagnosis that included kidney insufficiency. R23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 14 out of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. 2.Review of R61's EMR revealed a quarterly ''MDS'' assessment, located under the ''MDS'' tab, with an ARD of 03/23/26 revealed R61's admission date was 12/17/25. R61 had a BIMS score of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Active…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a Georgia Criminal History Check System (GCHEXS) fingerprint background check was completed prior to date of hire for one of seven new hire employees and reference checks were completed for seven of seven new hire employees. The deficient practice could result in a staff with an unknown criminal background having access to residents. 1.Review of employee records for the Administrator revealed he was hired on 12/01/25. The required GCHEXS fingerprint background check was completed on 12/02/25.During an interview on 04/17/26 at 3:42 PM, the Human Resources Director (HRD) stated GCHEXS background checks are completed for all employees except nurses and are required to be completed prior to the start date. The HRD stated the Administrator is not a facility employee but is a corporate employee based out of Iowa. 2.Review of employee records for the Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1, LPN 3, Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives of treatment prior to initiating psychotropic medication for one (Resident (R) 42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 22 residents. This failure increased the risk of residents not knowing the potential side effects of the medications. 1. Review of R42's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of R42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/20/26, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R42 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and was assessed by staff as severely cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed R42 took antianxiety medications.Review of R42's Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to convey information to hospital at the time of transfer, failed to notify resident and resident representative in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital, and failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the facility policy for bed hold including reserve bed payment. one of three residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for hospitalization out of 22 sampled residents. This failure creates the potential for residents and responsible parties to be misinformed of the transfer out of the facility and to not have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Review of R7's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and anxiety disorder. Review of R7's annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for one of three residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 22 residents. This had the potential to lead to inaccurate goals of care, including functional and health status and strengths and needs of the resident. Findings include:Review of medical record 02/9/26 no evidence of documented transfer notification; einteract transfer or bed hold. 02/9/26 Discharge MDS marked out in error - not completed; 02/10/26 Entry MDS marked out in error - not completeAn interview on 04/17/2026 at 7:16 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was unable to locate transfer notice to hospital, transfer notification to resident/resident representative or bed hold notice. The DON stated a notice of transfer is required to be sent with the resident to the hospital, written notice to the resident representative, and bed hold notice is required to be sent. DON confirmed 2/9/26 Discharge Return…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected a discontinued antipsychotic medication for one (Resident (R) 22) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 22 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to a lack of alternative interventions. Review of R22's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and dementia with behavioral disturbance.Review of R22's monthly Pharmacy Review provided by the facility revealed a pharmacy recommendation to discontinue quetiapine 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth daily starting on 03/05/26.Review of R22's Medication Administration Record located under the Orders tab of the EMR revealed Seroquel oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg) (quetiapine fumarate) give one tablet by mouth in the evening related to dementia with behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen was obtained prior to administering oxygen; ensure appropriate oxygen signage was posted on the resident's door; and ensure respiratory supplies were dated and stored in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for one of one residents (Resident (R) 68) reviewed for respiratory care out of a sample of 22 residents. This failure had the potential to compromise infection control and increase the risk of infection transmission within the facility. Cross Reference F658Findings include:Review of R68's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R68 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit.Review of R68's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR dated 04/07/26 revealed the resident was not care planned for oxygen.Review of Progress Notes located under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure personal resident refrigerators were maintained to prevent potential food borne illness for two residents of two sampled residents (Resident (R)33) and R50) who owned a refrigerator. This failure had the potential to cause the residents to eat spoiled food which could cause a decline in the residents' overall health. Findings include:1.Review of R33's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' assessment, located under the ''MDS'' tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/03/26 revealed R33 admission date was 12/29/21. R33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R33 had a diagnosis that included high blood pressure.During an observation and interview on 04/14/26 at 2:56 PM, R33 had a personal refrigerator near the door in her room. On the outside of the refrigerator door, a Refrigerator Temperature Log was attached to the door. There were no temperatures recorded on 04/11/26 or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity for one out of three Residents (R) (R8) observed during dining and for one out of three Residents (R) (262) observed during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R8 received a meal tray at mealtime due to a lack of sufficient dining table space causing R8 to observe other residents eating their meals while waiting for a space to become available and assistance. In addition, the facility failed to ensure R262's blood glucose testing procedure was completed in a private area to protect the resident's dignity. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised 2/2021, under the Policy Statement revealed, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-bring, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Under the section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Administering Oral Medications, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with accepted professional standards for one out of three Residents (R) (R55) observed during medication administration. Specifically, Registered Nurse (RN) (RN#7) withheld R55's physician-ordered medications without consulting with the physician for an order to do so. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Oral Medications, copyrighted in 2001, under the section titled Purpose revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. The policy did not address withholding ordered medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Holds revised 4/2007, under the Policy Statement revealed, Temporary medication holds may be ordered by the resident's attending physician. Review of the admission Record revealed, R55 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA