Cottage Grove Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 54.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.11 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, observation, fire department and police reports, ambulance reports, employee file review, and facility record review, the facility failed to utilize a lap and shoulder seatbelt restraint prior to transporting a resident in a facility van for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). On [DATE], during transport from a doctor's appointment, the facility van driver failed to secure a lap and shoulder seatbelt restraint for Resident #1, who was seated in a secured wheelchair in the back of a transport van. As a result, Resident #1 flew forward out of the wheelchair over a folded middle row seat when the driver swerved and braked to avoid another vehicle. Resident #1 landed face down on the folded second row seat, with her head near the floor between the second-row seating and back side of the driver's seat. Blood was present from Resident #1's nose. Resident #1 was unresponsive, did not appear to be breathing, was pulseless, and cyanotic (bluish or purplish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent a fall that resulted in fracture of the resident's right scapula (shoulder blade) and pain for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include:Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from Assisted Living after she had a fall that resulted in a fracture of the left humerus (upper arm). The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/28/2025 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, required substantial/maximum assistance to transfer from one surface to another, required supervision while eating, and had a history of falls with fracture in the prior 6 months. The resident had diagnoses including fractures, hypertension, diabetes, and dementia. The Care Plan initiated 10/22/2025 identified the resident had a risk for wandering related to dementia. It directed staff to be aware of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff with the appropriate skills and competencies to safely and effectively provide food service to the facility residents. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings Include: During observation of the facility puree process with Staff A, [NAME] on 04/29/25 at 10:30 am revealed the staff member lacked training and knowledge of the puree process. Staff A lacked instruction on how to complete the puree process and ensure puree diet residents get the same portions as regular diets. Staff A was uncertain how to measure out the puree content, did not know portion sizes and advised they serve pudding or ice cream instead of the dessert of the day. Staff served dessert and advised it was a bit runny and made no attempts to thicken before serving. On 04/29/25 at 12:05 pm the facility Registered Dietician, (RD) was queried regarding the puree process. The RD advised Staff A did not follow the menu and served larger portions than the menu called for. The RD advised Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, facility staff failed to ensure the internal temperature of food provided to the residents was cooked to the proper internal temperature and failed to document internal temperatures in the log book. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings Include: After observation of the facility meal process with Staff A, [NAME] on 04/29/25 at approximately 11:50 am Staff A failed to log food temperatures into the log book. Staff A advised all food temperatures where taken prior to meal service and all temperatures met required internal temperatures and it was an oversight not to log the temperatures. On 04/29/25 at 12:05 pm the facility Registered Dietician, (RD) was queried regarding food temperatures and logging. The RD advised Staff A did not follow proper guidelines for appropriate food handling processes. The RD advised all hot foods should be checked for safe internal temperatures and logged into the facility food temperature log book. The RD advised additional training in the kitchen will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to make reasonable accommodations for a resident to reach her clothes hanging in the closet for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 3/18/25 documented admission to the facility on 3/12/25. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #16 had recorded a score of 14/15, which identified intact cognition. The MDS documented it is very important to Resident #16 to take care of her personal belongings or things. The MDS documented a mobility device of a wheelchair. The MDS documented Resident #16's functional abilities at admission included: * Substantial maximal (helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) assistance for toileting, bathing and lower body dressing. * Partial/moderate (helper does less than half the effort. Helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, a posted notice, record review, staff interview, and family interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to respond to door alarms that sounded in the facility. Two door alarms sounded 4 times in 14 minutes without a staff response. 34 of 58 residents in the facility scored 12/15 or lower on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, which indicated they had moderate to severely impaired cognition. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: On 9/28/24 beginning at 11:00 AM facility residents could participate in an activity outside. Residents, staff, and family members had access to at least 2 exits near the main entrance of the building, one leading to the wheelchair ramp and the other leading to the lobby. A plastic sign mounted on the wall to the left of the door with the ramp indicated a code was needed for the door and could be obtained by contacting the nurse at the number provided. At 11:21 AM on 9/28/24 the ramp door alarm sounded which indicated the door had been open for more than 15 seconds. At…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications administered to a resident for anxiety and depression had matching diagnoses in the resident's electronic health record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6 documented an admission date of 9/20/24 and was in progress. Resident #6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the resident was taking the following: 1. Trazodone HCl oral tablet 50 MG, 25 mg by mouth at bedtime for depression/ insomnia (1/2 tab) 2. Duloxetine HCl oral capsule delayed release sprinkle 30 MG, 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for depression 3. Lorazepam Oral tablet 0.5 MG, 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for anxiety The resident's electronic health record diagnosis tab lacked diagnoses of depression and anxiety. The resident's Care Plan, with an admission date of 9/20/24, included focus areas for anxiety and depression monitoring and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for weight loss (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for Resident #2, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating no cognitive decision making abilities or impairment. Resident #2 required set up assistance with eating. No weight loss, or unknown, at the time of the assessment. Diagnoses included: anemia, hypertension, chronic pain, and malaise. The Care Plan, Nutritional Status with an initiated dated 5/7/24, I am at risk and interventions included: *has an allergy to strawberries and mushrooms. Also reports that she can't eat fungus such as bleu cheese or cruciferous vegetables. *Provide alternative foods to avoid allergens and intolerance's. *likes to snack in her room. Family brings in snacks of preference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and chart review the facility failed to offer toileting on a timely basis and failed perform proper hand hygiene and proper personal protective equipment guidelines to prevent the spread of potential infection and germs during incontinence cares for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #21, #27). In an observation it was discovered that Resident #21 was left in her chair for over 4 hours before offered toileting. Also, the facility failed to provide baths to residents per the resident's desired frequency for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #48). Facility further failed to put interventions in place to prevent voiding in inappropriate locations for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wandering behavior (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #21 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS documents the resident was dependent with toileting, personal hygiene, transfers,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews the facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #42, #44, #251, #39, #203, #48 ). Facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #44 required substantial/maximal (the helper does more than half the effort. The helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) assistance for, toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing. The MDS listed diagnoses include hip fracture, hepatic encephalopathy, other cirrhosis of liver, and obesity. The Care Plan initiated on 5/30/2024 identified Resident #44 as alert and oriented. The Care Plan identified Resident #44 as needing assistance with transferring, toileting, bathing, and repositioning. On 07/01/24 at 1:27 PM, observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a fall, medication refusals, and a significant weight loss for for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for a change in condition (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/22/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #48 which included skin changes, diabetes, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 4 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. 12/18/23 eMAR Administration Notes stated the resident refused his Med Pass supplement. 12/28/23 eMAR Administration Notes stated the resident refused his donepezil (used to treat dementia), carbidopa-levodopa (used to treat Parkinson's disease, a neurological condition with affected movement), metformin (used to treat diabetes), and vinpocetine (used to treat degenerative diseases of the nervous system). The facility lacked documentation of family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with professional standards for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Residents #33, #203, and #204). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 12/12/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #203 which included diabetes, hip fracture, and pain. The MDS listed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 6/30/24 at 2:58 p.m., Resident #203 stated she received medications which were ordered twice daily 6 hours apart. The December Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed an order for sulfasalazine (used to treat ulcerative colitis, the inflammation of the colon) delayed release 500 milligrams, give 3 tablets by mouth two times per day. The hours for the MAR were listed as Day and Eve. The Medication Admin Audit Report listed an order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA