Linn Manor Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 34.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall, resulting in a hip fracture for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident#1). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 listed diagnoses of dementia, heart failure, Atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), malnutrition, adult failure to thrive. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, which indicted severe cognitive impairment. Per the MDS, the resident had falls since admit, entry, reentry, or prior assessment, and had two or more with no injury.The Care Plan dated 1/15/25 identified Resident #1 at risk for falls. Interventions dated 1/15/25 included, Assess resident for needs prior to leaving the room. Ensure resident always has proper footwear when transferring, i.e. gripper socks or shoes. Keep personal items and frequently used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure safe transfers for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers (Residents #5 and #11). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 3, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented she was dependent on staff to assist her with transfers, toileting, moving herself in a wheelchair, and dressing. The MDS also documented her primary diagnosis of stroke and also has dementia, depression, and anxiety. Record review of an untitled fall report document for Resident #5 dated 4/12/24 documented she had a fall with two (2) staff present during a mechanical lift transfer. During the transfer Resident #5 sat up and leaned through the lift straps and fell out head first. She was taken to the local hospital due to a head laceration. Record review of Resident #5 Care Plan with a print…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility investigation review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all staff responded appropriately to a sounding door alarm for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for inadequate nursing supervision (Resident #1). On 3/24/26 a confused, ambulatory resident (Resident #1), known to have exit seeking behaviors, exited the facility's East door unattended and was seen by staff walking in the road away from the facility. The facility failed to ensure the staff member who responded to the door alarm initiated resident checks to ensure all residents were accounted for after the door alarm sounded, and failed to communicate that no one was seen at and outside the door. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The facility corrected the deficient practice per past noncompliance through the following actions: -Hourly then 15 minute checks for Resident #1 upon return to the facility-Stop sign redirections added to doors-Staff education on door alarm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications that have black box warnings (safety warning used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and requires the healthcare provider to have a comprehensive discussion with the resident/representative about the risks, benefits and alternatives for use) for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident #12, and Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 36 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/27/25, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #12's diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS identified that Resident #12 received antidepressant medication. Review of the Order Summary Report revealed an order for antidepressant medication Zoloft (sertraline), increased from 50 milligrams (mg) every morning to 100 mg every morning, started on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan to reflect the presence of an indwelling catheter, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Planning (Residents #24 and Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 36 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #24 had diagnoses of traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, C5-C7 incomplete quadriplegia, and kidney stone.The Nurse's Progress Notes dated 2/8/26 indicated Resident #24 returned to the facility from the hospital with an indwelling catheter for infected kidney stone until follow-up appointment with her Urologist.On 2/10/26 at 7:32 AM, observation revealed the resident had a catheter. The Care Plan initiated 9/18/19 lacked documentation that Resident #24 had an indwelling catheter or that she was in EBP. On 2/11/26, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to apply foot pedals to the wheelchair when transporting 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #27). The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the Admission/readmission Nursing Assessment, dated 2/02/26, revealed that Resident #27 was readmitted to the facility for skilled nursing services post fall with right hip fracture and surgical repair. Resident #27 required assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility and toileting, 1 staff assistance to transfer. Review of the Care Plan, date initiated 8/21/25, revealed that Resident #27 was at risk of falling and listed an intervention to utilize wheelchair for mobility. During an observation on 2/11/26 at 2:32 PM, Resident #27 asked a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to push her in the wheelchair, resident stated she could hold her legs up if that was okay, CNA responded okay. The CNA pushed Resident #27's wheelchair, without foot pedals attached to the wheelchair, as Resident #27 held legs up above the ground.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an opened insulin vial was not expired prior to administration for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed for insulin. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included diabetes mellitus. The MDS indicated that Resident #12 received insulin injections for 7 out of 7 days during the look back period. Review of the Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], revealed of Focus area for diabetes mellitus with the goal that Resident #12 would have no complications related to diabetes. Review of the Order Summary Report revealed an active order, started on [DATE], for Novolog (insulin Aspart) 100 units per milliliter (mL) solution with instructions to inject subcutaneously per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have the minimum required members at the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings to identify issues with respect to which quality assessment and assurance activities were necessary. The facility identified a census of 36 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility QAA sign in sheets revealed the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing (DON), and at least two other staff were present at the meetings. The Infection Preventionist was not present at the April 2025 or the December 2025 quarterly meetings. On 2/12/26 at 12:40 PM, Staff E, Corporate Nurse reported at the quarterly meetings in April and December there was no Infection Preventionist present at the meeting. She reported that the previous Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was the Infection Preventionist in April 2025 but she was not listed on the April QAA sign in sheets either.The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan lacked information that indicated the Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for EBP (Resident #24) and demonstrate proper hand hygiene practices to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #24). The facility reported a census of 36.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had diagnoses of traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and C5-C7 incomplete quadriplegia.The Nurse's Progress Notes dated 2/8/26 indicated that Resident #24 returned to the facility from the hospital with an indwelling catheter for infected kidney stone until follow-up appointment with her Urologist.The Care Plan initiated 9/18/19 lacked documentation that Resident #24 had an indwelling catheter or that she was in EBP. The Care Plan was updated to include both on 2/11/26 after the Director of Nursing (DON) was questioned about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide individualized Care Plan interventions to address resident trauma one out of one resident reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include:The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], listed diagnoses of Atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), malnutrition, adult failure to thrive. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 (severe cog impairment).The MDS revealed Resident#1's behaviors were physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others 1 to 3 days in the 7 day look back period. Wandering, and rejection of care1-3 days. The Trauma Informed Care assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident#1 reported repeated disturbing memories, thoughts or images of a stressful experience from the past and he confirmed upsetting dreams about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and physician interviews, and policy review the facility failed to document routine assessment and interventions completed by the facility for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #8 dated 11/24/2023 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating he was cognitively intact. The MDS informed he was independent with toileting and walking. The MDS documented a primary diagnosis of other neurological conditions and also diagnoses of diabetes, anemia, malnutrition, and Parkinson's. Record review of Resident #8 Assessments in his Electronic Health record (EHR) lacked documentation of complete assessments related to a decline in condition from 12/13/23 to 12/17/23. Record review of Resident #8 Progress Notes and Point of Care Records in his EHR revealed the following: 12/13/23 - Resident #8 had a medium formed bowel movement. 12/14/23 - Resident #8 had an emesis and the facility notified his Doctor of his decline with no new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings Include: A review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies and provider's Plan of Correction (POC) dated 7/18/22, with corrections initially dated 8/18/22 and revised to 10/1/22, identified the following deficiencies: a. F609 - Reporting of Alleged Violations. b. F657 - Care Plan Timing and Revision. c. F684 - Quality of Care. d. F689 - Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. e. F727 - Sufficient Nursing Staff. f. F868 - QAA Committee. The POC documented a plan to audit Incident Reports according to a schedule and to report and address identified concerns in QAPI Committee Meetings. The POC revealed training that instructed staff to immediately report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA