Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 42.0 residents a day — about 105% occupied, or roughly -2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.39 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent pressure injuries from developing for 1 (R38) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injuries.R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was at risk for the development of pressure injuries. R38's admission assessment does not indicate R38 has pressure injuries. Hospital discharge paperwork dated 12/5/25 does not indicate R38 had pressure injuries or had treatment orders for pressure injuries. On 12/7/25 a registered nurse documents a list of skin concerns including scabbed areas on R38's bilateral heels. These areas are not comprehensively assessed. No treatment orders are obtained from a physician and the risks and care concerns of these areas are not addressed in R38's baseline plan of care. On 12/8/25 the facility Wound Licensed Practical Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.* The 5th floor kitchen server for lunch was observed. The Cook-E used gloves for multiple tasks, including handling ready-to-eat foods. The food thermometer had a tethered string that was not maintained to prevent food contamination. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents on the 5th floor.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure Hospitality Department-Attendance, Conduct, and Safety Policy dated 9/12/2025 documents: The purpose of this policy is to give a hospitality employees clear direction regarding attendance, time-off requests, food handling, glove usage guidelines, kitchen safety, and grooming standards. Adherence to these guidelines protects employees, residents, and the reputation of [facility name].Procedures and Guidelines:5. Glove Usage documents under Changing Gloves:Gloves must be changed when switching tasks or workstations, after touching non-food surfaces (equipment handles, doors, trash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 resident received the necessary assessment to self-administer medications. On 2/16/26 at 9:44 a.m. Surveyor interviewed R2. Surveyor observed an Advair inhaler on the table beside the bed. Surveyor asked R2 if she uses the inhaler independently. R2 stated she does and has been using that inhaler for many years. Surveyor asked R2 if the nurses leave the inhaler in R2 possession and R2 stated yes. Surveyor reviewed R2 assessments, and a self-administration of medications assessment was not completed.Findings include:The facility's self-administration of medications policy dated December 2016 documents1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident.2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with psychotropic medications was comprehensively assessed for their use. This was observed with 1 (R38) of 5 resident medication reviews.* R38 was admitted [DATE] with Duloxetine (antidepressant), Bupropion (antidepressant) and Trazadone (antidepressant). The diagnosis for Duloxetine is for depression, Bupropion for dysthymia and Trazadone for insomnia. The medical record does not have documentation of a comprehensive assessment for the use of these medications. Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure Psychotropic Medication Use dated July 2022. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:1. A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior.2. Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: b. Anti-depressants .3. Residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not document additional assessments for the Care Area Assessment (CAA) triggered by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment information. This would include a summary of the information to complete a comprehensive assessment. This was observed with 3 (R38, R23, and R62) of 12 resident reviews. * R38 had an admission MDS assessment completed on 12/12/25. The MDS triggered CAAs for Falls, Pressure Injury, Psychotropic Drug Use, Psychosocial Well-Being and Behavioral Symptoms. The CAAs did not have an additional assessment summary analyzing the MDS data and need for an individualized care plan. * R23 had a Significant Change in Status (SCS) MDS assessment completed on 11/19/25. The MDS triggered a CAA for Falls. The CAA did not have an additional assessment summary analyzing the MDS data and need for an individualized care plan. * R62 had an admission MDS assessment completed on 11/16/25. The MDS triggered a CAA for Falls. The CAA did not have an additional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R52) of 12 residents reviewed received a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS). R52 was discharged to the hospital on 9/10/25 due to a change in condition. A discharge MDS was not completed.Findings include:R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia and hypertension. On 9/10/25 R52 was discharged to the hospital due to a change in condition. The MDS information reveals a discharge MDS was not completed on 9/10/25. The medical record reveals the MDS is late.On 2/17/26 at 12:52 p.m., Surveyor interviewed MDS Coordinator-Q. Surveyor explained R52 was discharged to the hospital on 9/10/25 and a discharged MDS was not completed. MDS Coordinator-Q stated she was hired in October to be the MDS Coordinator but hasn't done much with MDSs because she's been training. Surveyor asked MDS Coordinator-Q if she knew why the discharge MDS wasn't completed. MDS Coordinator-Q stated she would investigate it.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 12 residents reviewed received an accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. R2 was admitted on [DATE] and the admission MDS dated [DATE] assess R2 with the need for tracheostomy care. Surveyor notes R2 does not have a tracheostomy.Findings include:R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of right lower leg fracture, asthma, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 has moderate cognitive impairment and is independent with eating. Section O0110 Special Treatments Procedures and Programs documents while a resident R2 was receiving tracheostomy care. On 2/16/26 at 9:44 a.m. Surveyor interviewed R2. Surveyor observed R2 did not have a tracheostomy.On 2/17/26 at 12:52 p.m. Surveyor interviewed MDS Coordinator-Q. Surveyor explained the concern the admission MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 is receiving tracheostomy care. MDS Coordinator-Q stated the facility does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 (R38) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans.*R38's baseline care plan was not thoroughly completed as every section of R38's baseline care plan was not completed. Findings Include:The facility did not provide a baseline care plan policy and procedure for review.R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of One Rib, Right Side, Vascular Dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of the Native Coronary Artery (plaque buildup narrows the arteries that supply blood to the heart), Essential Hypertension (chronic condition of persistently high blood pressure), Insomnia (sleep disorder characterized by difficulty falling asleep), Anxiety Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, fear that interfere with daily activities), and Depression (mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete neurological (neuro) checks in accordance with policy and procedure for 1 (R38) of 4 residents reviewed for unwitnessed falls.*R38 did not receive neurological checks in accordance with facility's policy and procedure for 1 of 3 unwitnessed falls.Findings Include:The facility's Falls policy and procedure revised 12/25 documents:2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following:e. Neurological statusThe facility's process for completing neurological assessment is the following:-Time of incident-30 min post incident check-60 min post incident check-Following shifts for 72 hoursR38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fracture of One Rib, Right Side, Vascular Dementia(brain damage caused by multiple strokes), Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of the Native Coronary Artery(plaque buildup narrows the arteries that supply blood to the heart), Essential Hypertension(chronic condition of persistently high blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident (R23) with hearing and vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities.*Surveyor observed R23 to not be wearing R23's bilateral hearing aids and glasses during the survey process.Findings Include:The facility's Hearing Impaired Resident, Care of policy and procedure revised 2/18 documents:Policy Statement:Staff will assist hearing impaired residents to main effective communication with clinicians, caregivers, other residents and visitors.Policy Interpretation and Implementation:3. Staff will assist residents with care and maintenance of hearing devices.4. Staff will help residents who have lost or damaged hearing devices in obtaining services to replace the devices.j. Evaluate resident's adaptive needs and progress at regular intervals.R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeats occur…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R23, R38 and R62) of 4 sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent and be free of accidents. * On 2/2/26 R23 was evaluated by physical therapy, after the facility risk management team determined R23 was doing better, to assess changing R23's transfer status from the use of a mechanical lift to being transferred with a sit to stand or through a stand-pivot transfer. Following the evaluation R23 was upgraded to transfer with the assist of two staff using a sit to stand. R23's power of attorney for healthcare was not consulted with or notified of this change in care for R23. On 2/14/26 two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) proceeded with transferring R23 using a sit to stand despite R23 showing resistance to sitting upright to position the sling and releasing staffs hand to hold onto the bar. The CNAs (U and V) proceeded with raising R23 up using the lift and discovered a cord was in the way of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$90,278 in federal fines across 14 penalties.

• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $10,586 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI