Essex Meadows Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 38.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.28 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.79 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were at risk for falls, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified immediately when there was swelling of the heft hip and increased pain after the resident experienced a fall two (2) days prior. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, pain and repeated falls. The Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/30/25 identified that Resident #1 was at risk for falls. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 did not make decisions regarding tasks of daily living and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and ambulating. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/2/25 identified Resident #1 was a fall risk, had a history of frequent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a fall, the facility failed to assess the resident when there was swelling of the heft hip and increased pain after the resident experienced a fall two (2) days prior. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, pain and repeated falls. The Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/30/25 identified that Resident #1 was at risk for falls. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 did not make decisions regarding tasks of daily living and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and ambulating. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/2/25 identified Resident #1 was a fall risk, had a history of frequent falls and fractures, arthritis to both knees and osteopenia (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #8) reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI ' s) and 2 of 3 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #36) reviewed for weight changes, the facility failed to notify a provider of a medication omission for treatment of a UTI and failed to notify a provider of a significant weight gain for a resident with congestive heart failure (CHF) and failed to notify a provider of significant weight changes per facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 and had diagnoses that included cellulitis of left lower limb, CHF, and UTI. The Clinical admission assessment dated [DATE] at 3:51 PM identified Resident #8 was alert, disoriented, and confused with incoherent unclear speech that can sometimes be understood. Resident #8 required assistance with meals, used a walker and manual wheelchair, had a limb prosthesis due to amputation with lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #36), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 2 hours of the alleged violation. The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included hypertension, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15) and required maximum assistance for toileting, bed mobility and transfers, moderate assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent for bathing. The MDS further identified Resident #36 was always incontinent of urine and bowel. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/6/24 identified Resident #36 had a functional ability decline. Interventions included set up assistance for eating, assist of 2 for bathing, toileting hygiene and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) reviewed for edema and 1 of 3 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to utilize an as needed (PRN) medication according to provider order for a resident with congestive heart failure (CHF) and the facility failed to complete preventative weekly skin assessments according to facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 and had diagnoses that included cellulitis of left lower limb, CHF, and dementia. The Clinical admission assessment dated [DATE] at 3:51 PM identified Resident #8 was alert, disoriented, and confused with incoherent unclear speech that could sometimes be understood. Resident #8 required assistance with meals, used a walker and a manual wheelchair, had a limb prosthesis due to an amputation with lower extremity range of motion impairment on one side, had an unsteady gait with poor balance and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for weight changes, the facility failed to obtain weights per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included hypertension, hypo-osmolarity and hyponatremia (fluid and electrolyte imbalance), chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. Review of the hospital Discharge Summary document dated 10/17/24 identified that Resident #36 was discharged on 10/17/24 and a weight of 199.0 pounds (Lbs) was obtained on 10/17/24. A Dietary/Nutrition Profile note dated 10/20/24 at 9:44 AM by the Dietician identified that Resident #36 was at risk for altered nutrition due to abnormal labs, diabetes with Hemoglobin A1C (average blood sugars in blood during the past 2 to 3 months) of 7.0 (normal range: below 5.7%) and hyponatremia (low blood sodium level) which improved upon being discharged from the hospital. The note identified a reweight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #8) reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI), the facility failed to timely start treatment for a resident with a confirmed infection. The findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 and had diagnoses that included cellulitis of left lower limb, dementia, and congestive heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 was moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10) and was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/2/2025 identified Resident #8 was at risk for infection related to chronic illness, and a history of bacteremia and cellulitis. Interventions included encouragement and assistance with good hand hygiene, and social distancing as indicated. The RCP further identified Resident #8 had a self-care deficit and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for unnecessary and psychotropic medications, the facility failed to enter a 14 day stop date for an as needed antipsychotic medication. The findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 and had diagnoses that included personal history of malignant neoplasm, severe sepsis with septic shock, and generalized anxiety disorder. A Provider order dated 11/29/2024 directed to administer prochlorperazine maleate (antiemetic-vomit prevention) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 6 hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15), had no issues found during a drug regimen review, required setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and was dependent for transfers. The Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were at risk for elopement, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who had exit seeking behaviors and required a wander guard bracelet, was not able to exit the facility unsupervised. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's, anxiety, restlessness and agitation. A physician's order dated 9/11/24 directed to check the functionality of the wander guard device one (1) time a day and placement of the wander guard on the right ankle every shift. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short- and long-term memory deficits, poor decision-making skills regarding tasks of daily life, difficulty focusing attention, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/30/24 identified Resident #1 was an elopement risk related to being forgetful. Interventions directed a wander guard in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse for (Resident #17), the facility failed to ensure reporting of verbal abuse timely and for (Resident # 29), the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to an overseeing state agency. The findings included: 1. Resident #17 was admitted with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, dementia with behavioral disturbances and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive two persons physical assistance with bed mobility, total dependence two persons for transfers and extensive one person assistance with personal hygiene. A care plan reviewed on 7/27/22 identified Resident #17 utilized medications for anxiety and depression. Interventions included to provide listening support and reassurance when anxious. Additionally, the care plan reviewed on 7/27/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT