No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colonial Rehabilitation And Nursing, LLC

1340 E Fillmore St, Colorado Springs, CO 80907 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (719) 473-1105 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)3 actual-harm citations$24,453 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,453 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-31)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1615 Medical Center Pt · (719) 636-3555 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1625 Medical Center Pt Ste 140 · (719) 577-9800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
945 E Fillmore St · (719) 492-0547 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2701 Melissa Dr · (719) 385-5940 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1311 Columbine Blvd · (719) 473-2370

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.6%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.1%8.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.2%13.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.7%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.9%20.0%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.501.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.741.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
61.5%
Total nursing turnover
90.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#18) of four residents reviewed for treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 39 sample residents. Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE] for long term care with diagnoses of hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), wound on the right ankle, contracture of muscles on the right lower leg, gait and mobility abnormalities and generalized muscle weakness.On 1/3/25 Resident #18 had a wound to his right lateral malleolus (outer ankle) that was healing per the wound physician. On 4/21/25 the wound physician documented the resident's wound had resolved.On 6/9/25 Resident #18 developed a new trauma wound to his right lateral malleolus. The wound physician began regularly rounding on the resident upon the redevelopment of the wound. The physician's orders directed staff to place a boot to Resident #18's ankle at all times. However, observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for tone (#4) of four residents reviewed for accidents out of 39 sample residents.Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] for long term care with a diagnosis of dementia. According to the care plan, Resident #4 was determined to be a high fall risk. On 3/4/25 Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall in her room and sustained an abrasion to her left knee and a bruise to her forehead. The facility failed to implement a new person-centered fall intervention after the fall. On 3/17/25 Resident #4 sustained another unwitnessed fall in her room where she sustained a right hip fracture that was diagnosed when she was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Upon return to the facility, the facility failed to implement person-centered interventions to prevent or reduce future falls. Resident #4 sustained 12 additional falls (two falls on 4/11/25, 4/21/25, two falls on 4/25/25, 5/8/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (#40) out of two residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents out of 32 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to ensure -Resident #40's fall interventions were implemented. The resident experienced two falls in one month, one which resulted in a right hip fracture. Additionally, the facility failed to investigate the falls, to determine the root cause. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy dated 3/10/23 was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/30/23 at 4:56 p.m. It read in pertinent part. The purpose of this fall management policy is to modify or eliminate risk factors as applicable and thereby attempt to reduce the likelihood of falls with significant injury. The fall reduction program will be established and maintained, to assess all residents to determine their risk for falls. A plan of care will be implemented based on the residents assessed needs. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. Specifically, the facility failed to schedule a RN for at least eight consecutive hours on 3/2/26, 3/3/26 and 3/4/26.Findings include:I. Record reviewA review of the 3/2/26, 3/3/26 and 3/4/26 nursing staff schedule revealed there were no RNs scheduled to work on those three days.II. Staff interviewThe nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 3/9/26 at 2:55 p.m. and said there were no RNs available in the facility for 3/2/26, 3/3/26 and 3/4/26, while the director of nursing (DON) was on vacation. The NHA said the scheduling coordinator was responsible for the staffing schedule to ensure a RN was available for at least eight hours a day. The NHA said a RN had been scheduled to work the night shift on 3/5/26 and 3/6/26 and the scheduler would ensure a RN was scheduled at least eight consecutive hours a day in the future.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#5) of eight residents reviewed for abuse out of 12 sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #5 from verbal abuse by Resident #15.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the regional clinical resource on 12/4/25 at 5:21 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse and achieve the identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accidents and hazards for one (#7) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 12 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the safe and appropriate use of mechanical lifts when working with Resident #7.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy and procedure, dated 4/11/25, was received from the regional clinical resource on 12/4/25 at 5:21 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe. Damaged, broken, or improperly functioning lift equipment will not be used and tagged out according to facility policy. Staff will be educated on the use of safe handling/transfer practices to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to take steps to protect four (#67, #39, #36 and #31) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #67, Resident #39, Resident #36 and Resident #31 from physical abuse by Resident #17.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure, revised 4/11/25, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/21/25 at 10:19 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include resident-to-resident altercations. It includes physical abuse.II. Incident of physical abuse between Resident #17, Resident #67 and Resident #39 on 6/19/25A. Facility investigationThe 6/19/25 nurse note revealed the nurse was in the nurses' station when a certified nurse aide (CNA) called for help in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure activities designed to support the residents' physical, mental and psychosocial well-being were provided for three (#17, #36 and #42) of four residents reviewed for activities out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to to offer and provide personalized activity programs for Resident #17, Resident #36 and Resident #42. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the regional clinical regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/24/25 at 5:12 p.m The policy read in pertinent part, “It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#47, #9 and #42) of five residents were free from chemical restraints were receiving the least restrictive approach for their needs out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #47 and Resident #9 behavior care plans included resident specific non-pharmacological care approaches;-Document consistent behaviors for Resident #47 and Resident #9 to justify the continued use of psychotropic medications; -Document resident-specific care approaches, to include medication specific target behaviors and person-centered intervention for Resident #47 and Resident #9's psychotropic medications; and,-Ensure gradual dose reductions (GDR) were attempted for Resident #42's psychotropic medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Use Of Psychotropic Medications policy, revised 4/28/25, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/24/25 at 5:12 p.m. It read in pertinent part, “It is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to assistance items for one (#49) of two residents reviewed for ADLs out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #49, who was dependent on staff for care, received her preferred communication device during ADLs. Findings include: I. Resident #49A. Resident statusResident #49, age less than 65, was admitted prior to 2020. According to the July 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis of the lower half of the body including the legs and sometimes the abdomen), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and aphasia (difficulty speaking). The 5/8/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. She was dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, rolling, sitting to lying and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries from occurring or worsening for one (#14) of four residents reviewed out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent interventions to Resident #14, who had a pressure ulcer.Findings include:I. Professional reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, third edition, [NAME] Haesler (Ed.), EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA (2019), retrieved on 7/29/25 from https://www.internationalguideline.com/guideline, Pressure ulcer classification is as follows:Category/Stage 1: Nonblanchable Erythema (discoloration of the skin that does not turn white when pressed, early sign of tissue damage)Intact skin with nonblanchable redness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one (#18) of two residents reviewed for mobility out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18's hand splint was applied as ordered to help maintain the resident's limb function and mobility.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/24/25 at 5:21 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This includes appropriate equipment, including braces or splints. A nurse with responsibility for the resident will monitor for consistent implementation of the care plan interventions. Refusals of care or problems associated with range of motion exercises will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters received the appropriate care and services according to professional standards for one (#7) of three residents reviewed for catheter care out of 39 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Use privacy bag for Resident #7's catheter drainage bag;-Ensure Resident #7's catheter was placed appropriately to ensure the urine could flow freely; -Ensure Resident #7's catheter bag was emptied timely; and,-Consistently monitor Resident #7's intake and output per physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Catheter Care policy and procedure, implemented 5/24/25, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/24/25 at 9:11 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services for one (#22) of two residents reviewed out of 39 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22's feeding tube was in place prior to administering a bolus feeding per physician's orders.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the regional nurse consultant (RNC), on 7/24/25 at 5:34 p.m. It read in pertinent part, In accordance with facility protocol, licensed nurses will monitor and check that the feeding tube is in the right location. Tube placement will be verified before beginning a feeding and before administering medications.II. Resident statusResident #22, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included hemiplegia (weakness on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who displayed or were diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practical physical, mental, and psychological well-being for one (#47) of two residents reviewed for dementia care out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement effective dementia management-focused interventions to prevent Resident #47 from wandering into other residents' rooms, shower rooms, the nurses' station and standing over the top of other residents. Findings include: I. Resident #47 A. Resident status Resident #47, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, depression and cognitive communication deficit. The 7/23/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, with a brief interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications for two (#61 and #42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #61 and Resident #42 were monitored for hours of sleep for insomnia (difficulty sleeping) medications.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Use of Psychotropic Medications policy and procedure, revised 4/28/25, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 7/24/25 at 5:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The effects of the psychotropic medications on a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being will be evaluated on an ongoing basis and in accordance with nurse assessments and medication monitoring parameters consistent with clinical standards of practice, manufacturer's specifications, and the resident's comprehensive plan of care.II. Resident #61A. Resident statusResident #61, age [AGE], was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious disease. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed proper infection control procedures for Resident #7, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) (4/2/24), was retrieved on 3/20/25 from https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/PPE.html. It read in pertinent part,Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.EBP may be indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0555 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to choose his or her preferred attending physician for four ( #1, #2, #3 and #4) of six residents out of 12 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist residents to make an informed choice for selecting their attending physician when the facility changed medical provider groups. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights policy, revised December 2016, was provided by the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 10/16/24 at 2:48 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident ' s right to be informed about his or her rights, be informed of, choose an attending physician, and participate in decision-making regarding his or her care. II. Resident interviews Resident #4, who was cognitively intact based on facility assessment, was interviewed on 10/16/24 at 1:12 p.m. Resident #4 said she was aware her attending physician had changed. She said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at the appropriate temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, texture, temperature and appearance. Findings include: I. Resident group interview A group interview was conducted on 8/29/23 at 3:26 p.m. with five cognitively independent residents (#29, #42, #44, #49, and #65). All the residents in the group interview said that the food was not palatable. Residents said the hot food came cold. II. Individual resident interviews Resident #62 was interviewed on 8/28/23 at 9:34 a.m. She said the meat served at dinner was sour and bland. She said the meat would have been better with salt and pepper. She did not know if there was salt and pepper served on the tray. Resident #42 was interviewed on 8/28/23 at 2:15 p.m. The resident said the meals were too salty. He said he did not ask for an alternative because it was too late to order an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the residents' nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow the correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents; and, -Ensure the correct items were served in accordance with the posted menu. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Meal Distribution policy and procedure, revised September 2017, was received from the Regional Clinical Consultant (RCC) on 8/31/23 at 3:39 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All meals will be assembled in accordance with the individualized diet order, plan of care, and preferences. The dining services department staff will assemble the meal in accordance with the individual meal card. II. Failure to follow the correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents Observations and record review During a continuous observation during the breakfast meal tray line on 8/30/23 starting at 7:09 a.m. and ending at 8:40 a.m., cook #2 and dietary service aide (DSA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary department followed safe practices to prevent the potential contamination of food and spread of food-borne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food items removed from their original packaging and opened had a dating system. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, retrieved on 9/10/23 from: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_Eff Jan2019.pdf revealed in pertinent part: A date marking system may include: Using a method approved by the Department for refrigerated, ready-to eat potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food) that is frequently rewrapped, such as lunch meat or a roast, or for which date marking is impractical, such as soft serve mix or milk in a dispensing machine; Marking the date or day of preparation, with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident abuse for two (#48 and #52) of four residents reviewed for physical abuse out of 32 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was free from physical abuse from Resident #52. Cross reference F744, dementia care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Policy was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/28/23 at 12:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Communities do not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members and other residents. Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of residents property, and exploitation. Identification of abuse shall be the responsibility of every employee. Physical abuse is defined as abuse that results in bodily harm with intent. It includes hitting, slapping, pinching and kicking. Willful means…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to offer sufficient fluid intake to sustain hydration and ensure each resident was able to maintain the highest practical level of health and wellbeing for two residents (#21and #25) of 5 reviewed for hydration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #21 and Resident #25 were provided with sufficient hydration in accordance with the resident's plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hydration Policy, revised November 2019, was received from the nursing home administrator on 8/30/23. It read in pertinent part,Residents are provided with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. Resident's identified at risk for fluid volume deficit will be assessed timely and provided appropriate interventions to promote adequate hydration. Residents identified with potential/actual hydration issues will be reviewed/assessed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for contributing risk factors/conditions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for two (#41 and #49) of five residents reviewed for medication errors out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #41 received prescribed daily doses of Vraylar (antipsychotic) and Trazodone (antidepressant), as ordered by the resident's physician; and -Resident #49 received a prescribed daily dose of Abilify (antipsychotic) and Lialda (anti-inflammatory agent used to treat ulcerative colitis), as ordered by the resident's physician. Findings include: I. Professional standards According to [NAME], P.A. and [NAME], A.G. et.al., (2021), Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 edition, pp 599 - 609. Nurses play an important role in patient safety, especially in the area of medication administration. The safe administration of medications is also an important topic for current nursing researchers. As a nurse you need to know how to calculate medication doses accurately and understand the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as prescribed by the physician to two Residents (#69 and #67) of 16 sample residents for a therapeutic diet, out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #69 and Resident #67 to receive a carbohydrate controlled diet (CCD: meals that contain carbohydrate-rich foods in fairly equal amounts to help control the blood sugar levels). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Diabetic Management Policy and Procedure, dated 7/28/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/30/23 at 2:17 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Diabetic management involves both preventative measures and treatment of complications. From admission, the interdisciplinary team works together to implement a plan of care to minimize complications. The Therapeutic Diets Policy and Procedure, dated 1/12/16, was received by the NHA on 8/30/23 at 4:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure warm food items were held at the proper temperature to reduce the potential risk of food borne illness; and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen. Findings include: I. Ensure hot food items were held at the proper temperature to reduce the risk of food borne illness. A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf. It read in pertinent part; The food shall have an initial temperature of 41ºF (Fahrenheit) or less when removed from cold holding temperature control or 135°F or greater when removed from hot holding temperature control. B. Facility policy and procedure The Food Preparation policy, revised September 2017 was provided by the dietary regional manager (DRM) on 10/16/19 at 1:03…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that three (#15, #57 and #65) out of three residents reviewed for dignity out of 36 sample residents, were treated in a dignified manner Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #57 and Resident #65 were informed and/ or offered to be assisted away from the table prior to housekeeping personnel sprayed sanitizing chemical on the tables, while residents were still seated at the dining table; and -Ensure resident #15 wishes were honored around going to bed. -Ensure resident #15 wishes around plugging in motor scooter were honored. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Dignity and Personal Privacy policy, with a revision date of June 2007, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/15/19 at 5:37 p.m. It reads, in pertinent part .Dignity means that when interacting with residents, staff carries out activities that assist the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed: -To provide clean hand towels and wash clothes to the residents, and; -Maintain clean dining room floors. Findings include: I. Towels A.Resident council A resident council meeting was conducted on 10/15/19 at 10:30 a.m. with six residents selected by the facility. The residents said they had to ask for towels from the certified nurse aides or grab extras from the shower rooms when they showered. The resident said towels were not passed out on a daily basis. B. Observations The resident ' s rooms were observed on 10/15/19 at 12:30 p.m. During these observations, the resident ' s shared restrooms were sparsely supplied with towels, some restrooms having none at all. Towels not found in rooms on 10/15/19 at 12:30 p.m. The observations were as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] had one towel for two residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] had one towel for two residents. room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (#67 and #15) of two out of 36 sample residents were without restraints. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #67's legs was not propped up on an electric recliner that resident was not able to remotely control; and -Resident #15 had an assessment that justified the use of a wander guard. Findings Include: I. Facility policy The Restraint Management System policy with a revision date of November 2017 was provided by the life engagement coordinator (LEC) on 10/14/19 at 10:17 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part that .Restraints are implemented in accordance with State and Federal regulations. If indicated, the least restrictive restraint is used for the least amount of time. Restraints are not used as a disciplinary action or for the convenience of the facility to control behavior. The policy further defined physical restraint and reported that it is any manual method, physical or mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. PICC line A. Professional reference Nursing licensure requirements in Colorado (2019) https://www.nursinglicensure.org/state/nursing-license-colorado.html#lpn (retrieved on 10/15/19). It read in pertinent part; A licensed practical nurse (LPN) who completed an intravenous (IV) training should get transcripts and course descriptions from the training center; the candidate should also secure a competency checklist from a former instructor or registered nurse (RN) supervisor. The LPN license in Colorado does not automatically grant IV authority. An IV certification course for LPNs was required to perform any IV procedures on residents within their scope of practice. B. policy The administration of an intermittent infusion policy revised May 2016 provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 2:00 p.m. read in pertinent part; The nurse is responsible and accountable for obtaining and maintaining competence with infusion therapy within his or her scope of practice. IV. Resident #277 A. Resident #277,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had competencies. Specifically the facility failed ensure the licensed nurses were trained on the crash carts. Finding include: I. Facility policy The nasotracheal suctioning policy revised December 2018 provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 3:00 p.m. read in pertinent part; .Tracheal suctioning involves the removal of secretions from the trachea or bronchi by means of a catheter inserted through the mouth or nose. The procedure helps maintain a patent airway to promote optimal exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide and to prevent pneumonia that can result from pooling of secretions . II. Observations and interviews The facility had three crash carts in the building, one for each station. The licensed nurses were interviewed in regards to how to operate the crash carts, in the event of an emergency. However, the observations and interviews showed, the nurses had not been trained on how to operate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater. Specifically, the medication pass observation error rate was 46.15 %, or 12 errors out of 26 opportunities for error. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Medication Administration policy, revised date of June 2008, provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 1:00 p.m., read in pertinent part: Administer medications within 60 minutes of the scheduled time. Unless otherwise specified by the physician. II. Medication errors A. Resident #24 1. Observation Registered nurse (RN) #4 was observed on 10/14/19 at 4:15 p.m. looking at the MAR (medication administration record) for Resident # 24. The electronic MAR showed the medication highlighted in a red color, to indicate they were late. The medications were scheduled to be given at 3:00 p.m. The RN said she did not administer the medications because the resident wanted to take them when she ate dinner. 2. Record review The computerized physician orders (CPO), dated 8/1/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident food was palatable in taste, texture, appearance, and temperature Findings include: I. Policy and procedures The Food Quality and Palatability policy, revised September 2017 was provided by the dietary regional manager (DRM) on 10/16/19 at 1:03 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The cook will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize the amount of time that food items are exposed to temperatures greater than 41Fahrenheit (F) and/or less than 135F. II. Group interview A group interview was conducted on 10/15/19 at 10:30 a.m. with six alert and oriented residents selected by the facility, who were all active in the resident council monthly meetings. All of the residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive and accurate assessment of functional capacity after a significant change of condition for one (#70) of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to comprehensively assess changes of condition in multiple areas of the resident's physical condition. Findings included: I. Resident #70 Resident #70, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2019 computerized physician orders, diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and muscle weakness. Record review revealed Resident #70 made improvements in bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on the unit, dressing, eating, toileting, and hygiene. The resident also had an increase in verbal and physical behaviors and refusing care. The resident also had significant weight loss. Review of the initial minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/19 revealed the resident was coded as follows: -Bed Mobility- 3/2 (limited assist of one person)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for four (#2, and #44) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) assistance of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: - Ensure Resident #2 received assistance with communicating her needs; and -Ensure Resident #44 received assistance with meals. Findings include: I. Communication A. Facility policies and procedures The Communicating with Persons with Limited English Proficiency policy, revised October 2015, was provided by the nursing home administrator(NHA) on 10/16/19 at 1:03 p.m. It reads, in pertinent part .It is facility policy to ensure that persons with limited english proficiency are identified and that the facility is capable of communicating information to such persons efficiently . B. Resident #2 1. Resident status Resident #2 over the age of 90, was admitted on [DATE].According to the October 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#4) of 36 sample residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care to Resident #4 Findings include I Facility Policy The Incontinence Management policy revised on December 2018 was provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 3:00 p.m., it read in pertinent part; . Moisture-associated skin damage and infection may result from incontinence II.Resident #4 A. Resident #4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2019 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnosis included dementia. The 8/14/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed, Resident #4 was rarely understood and therefore a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment was not attempted. The resident required extensive assistant with two persons for bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for one (#60) out of six residents out of 36 sample residents reviewed. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #60 met his hydration needs Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hydration Management policy revised date July 2017 provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 3:00 p.m. read in pertinent part; .Residents are provided with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and nutritional status. Residents hydration status will be monitored on a regular basis . II. Resident #60 A. Resident #60, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2019 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnoses include dementia and diabetes. The 9/7/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed, Resident #60 was able to complete the assessment with had moderate cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#49) out of one out of 36 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care received treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed: -To implement person-centered care plan treatment and care resulting in self injurious behaviors of biting and chewing on arms and hands; -To provide preferred activities to the resident; and -To communicate with the resident while providing care. Findings include: I. Failed the facility failed to implement person-centered care plan treatment and care due to her anxiety and related self injurious behaviors of biting and sucking. II. Facility Policy and Procedure A copy of the policy Skin Management was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/15/19 at 5:33 p.m. It read in pertinent part .Residents receive care to aid in the prevention or worsening of wounds and/or pressure ulcers. Individuals at risk for skin compromise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow proper hand hygiene with glove uses when working between dirty and clean processes; and -Follow proper sanitization of equipment is between resident use. Finding include: I. Hand washing II. Facility policy The hand hygiene policy revised on February 2018 was provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 10/15/19 at 3:00 p.m. read in pertinent part; .To decrease the risk of transmission of infection by appropriate hand hygiene . III. Observations Certified nurse aide (CNA) #12 was observed on 10/14/19 at 9:28 a.m.to remove the mechanical lift and sling from Resident #49. The CNA left that in the hallway and did not disinfect that after resident use. Registered nurse (RN) #5 was observed on 10/09/19 at 11:47 a.m. to push the wound treatment cart into Resident # 63s room and wound care was completed for the resident. The treatment cart was then pushed out of the room into the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,453 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $24,453 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-29 for 40 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHARLY BELLO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MAZE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
PICKD LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MAHRT, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MYERS, ADELAIDEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/12/2014
MYERS, KATIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MYERS, MALLORYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/12/2024
MYERS, WALTERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SWAIN, HANNAHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/12/2024
SWAIN, HOLLYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SWAIN, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SWAIN, TAYLORIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/12/2024
COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
TURLEY, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
REDDY, VIKASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 3%Other / private 3%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,262per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065225. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next