Valle Vista Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 53.3 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to evaluate, monitor, and manage a chronic scalp lesion/wound despite changes in the wound condition, including documented drainage; and failed to ensure timely wound management prior to and following the identification of a maggot infestation1 for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in a decline of the resident's scalp lesion/wound condition and the development of maggot infestation1 requiring additional wound management and evaluation. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 6/30/26 at 2:50 p.m., resident #3 was observed with multiple, black-colored lesions on the scalp. A large central lesion approximately the size of a tennis ball was observed on the scalp. The lesion was black in color and partially covered with a brown-colored material. Yellowish, foul-smelling fluid was present. Resident #3's hair surrounding the lesions was discolored and had crusted, dried material present. Resident #3 stated she had one of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were identified and initiated, including ensuring appropriate signage was posted and personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily accessible at the point of care for 4 (#s 1, 2, 3, and 7) of 7 sampled residents who either had wounds or an indwelling foley catheter; and the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed in accordance with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations during the distribution of clean linen for 3 (#s 5, 6, and 7) of 7 sampled residents. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the transmission of infection throughout the facility. Findings include:1. Review of a facility document titled Residents on EBP, showed resident #1 had a wound, resident #2 had a wound and an indwelling foley catheter, resident 3 had a skin lesion, and resident #7 had a wound requiring enhanced barrier precautions.During an observation on 6/30/26 at 2:40 p.m., resident #3 had no enhanced barrier precautions signage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in condition related to a chronic scalp lesion/wound, including new onset of drainage, for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the physician not being provided with timely information about a change in the resident's condition necessary to evaluate the need for additional assessment, treatment, or intervention. Findings include:During an observation on 6/30/26 at 2:50 p.m., resident #3 had a scalp lesion/wound with black discoloration, drainage, and a foul odor.Review of resident #3's weekly skin assessments dated 11/23/25, 11/30/25, and 12/7/25 showed there was documented drainage from the resident's scalp lesion/wound.Review of resident #3's nursing progress notes dated 11/23/25-12/9/25 showed no documentation that the physician was notified of the change in condition related to the development of drainage from the scalp lesion/wound.During an interview on 6/30/26 at 4:01 p.m., staff member C stated the physician should be notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive wound assessment, monitoring, and documentation of a chronic scalp lesion/wound in accordance with accepted standards of nursing practice, including complete documentation of wound characteristics including size, shape, color, and drainage for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents. This deficient practice limited the ability to accurately monitor and evaluate changes in the resident's chronic scalp lesion/wound, identify changes in lesion/wound status, and determine when additional clinical evaluation or intervention was required. Findings include:Review of resident #3's weekly skin assessments dated 6/2/25-6/29/25, and 11/2/25-11/16/25, showed no documentation of the resident's chronic scalp lesion/wound.Review of resident #3's weekly skin assessment dated [DATE]-[DATE], and 12/14/25-6/14/26, showed the presence of a scalp lesion/wound. There was no documentation describing the scalp lesion/wound characteristics, including shape, size,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician supervision and ongoing clinical oversight following notification of a significant change in condition involving a maggot-infested scalp wound for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents. There was no documented physician assessment or reassessment of the resident's condition or additional clinical guidance to address the significant change in condition while the resident awaited outpatient surgical evaluation. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 6/30/26 at 2:50 p.m., resident #3 had multiple black-colored skin lesions on her scalp. Resident #3 had a large central lesion about the size of a tennis ball, black in color, and was partially covered with a brown-colored material. There was a yellowish, foul-smelling fluid present. During an interview on 6/30/26 at 3:05 p.m. NF1 and NF2 stated resident #3 was admitted to the facility with the skin lesion. NF1 stated [Staff Member D] was aware of the lesion upon admission but only sees [Resident #3] on occasion. NF1 stated the lesion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by failing to ensure the resident's medical record accurately reflected the presence, characteristics, and changes in a scalp lesion/wound for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an incomplete medical record that did not accurately reflect the resident's condition or provide a complete picture of the wound status, or care provided.Review of resident #3's weekly skin assessments dated 6/2/25- 6/29/25 and 11/2/25-11/16/25, showed no documentation of the resident's chronic scalp lesion/wound.Review of resident #3's weekly skin assessments dated 7/6/25-9/28/25 and 12/14/25-6/14/26, showed documentation of the presence of a scalp lesion/wound, but the record did not include complete documentation of the lesion/wound characteristics, including size, shape, color, and drainage characteristics.Review of resident #3's electronic medical record dated 6/12/26 showed no documentation that a comprehensive assessment of the chronic scalp lesion/wound was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff follow safe food labeling and storage processes in accordance with standards for food service safety and failed to maintain sanitary conditions, including employee hygiene. These deficient practices affected all residents receiving food services from the facility's kitchen and dietary staff, and the deficient practices would continue if not addressed. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview of the kitchen, on 6/1/26 at 11:42 a.m., the following conditions were present:- The maroon cereal bowls were stored upright in a bus tub. Staff member W said the bowls should be turned over when stored so stuff does not fall into the bowl.- Four large metal bowls were observed sitting upright on wire shelves. - A large unlabeled tub of dried beans was noted near the stove. Staff member W identified the contents of the container as pinto beans. Staff member W said the beans should have been thrown away.- Two opened plastic squeeze bottle of Smucker's strawberry jam were on the shelf near the stove. The label…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to accurately reflect individual resident-centered care needs for 3 (#s 4, 18, and 61) of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #61's EHR, dated from admission on [DATE] to discharge on [DATE], showed the resident displayed frequent behaviors, which included refusing care, refusing to eat, refusing to use the call light, and yelling out for help for extended periods of time. The resident's refusals of care and yelling behavior continued throughout the resident's stay. The nursing notes showed the staff attempted to meet the resident's needs without a corresponding decrease in behaviors. During an interview on 6/1/26 at 12:30 p.m., NF4 stated resident #61 was admitted to the facility for strengthening physical therapy with a goal to return home with her spouse. NF4 stated he did not remember the facility discussing behavioral health services in an effort to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, the facility and staff failed to provide the necessary behavioral health services and oversight for a resident who displayed disruptive yelling, refusals of care, and verbal abuse toward staff regularly, and failed to document the resident's responsible party's refusal of behavioral health services. The medical record did not include evidence to show the facility consistently attempted to identify, trend, implement, monitor, or modify behavioral interventions consistently as the behaviors continued without change, to assist the resident with maintaining or improving her mental health and well-being, for 1 (#61) of 18 sampled residents. Due to these failures, the resident continued her disruptive yelling and refusals of care. Findings include:Review of resident #61's EHR, dated from 6/2/25 to 10/19/25, showed the resident displayed frequent behaviors, which included refusing care, refusing to eat, refusing to use call light, and yelling out for help for extended periods of time. Refusals of care and yelling behaviors continued to occur. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a quadriplegic resident with a wheelchair after discharging and transferring him to an Adult Services Residential Program facility on the East coast and failed to document the transfer discharge of the resident in the medical record, for 1 (#2) of 4 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in a resident not having his main mode of locomotion. Findings include:During an interview on 11/5/25 at 8:00 a.m., NF3 stated when his ambulance service picked up resident #2, there was no wheelchair included in the resident's belongings that were to go with him on the transport to the Pennsylvania facility.During an interview on 11/5/25 at 8:32 a.m., staff member D stated having a wheelchair for mobility was important for resident #2 to get up to go to meals and sit at the nurses' station for extra supervision. During an interview on 11/5/25 at 8:59 a.m., NF5 stated he came to the facility a few days before resident #2 was to discharge to the Pennsylvania facility, to fit him for a new power wheelchair. NF5 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate infection prevention and control program was maintained, to include appropriate cleaning of facility equipment, and an annual review of all policies and procedures including the facility's water management system and Legionella surveillance. This deficient practice increased the likelihood of residents acquiring a healthcare-associated communicable disease or infection in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 5/19/25 at 4:26 p.m. with staff member E, the North hallway common bathtub was observed during a tour of a shower room. The bathtub had multiple long streaks of dark, rust color stains on the sides and floor of the tub. The drain had dried dark brown sediment around it. The bathtub did not have signage or a cover which notified staff and residents it was not to be used. Staff member E stated she had not cleaned the North hallway bathtub in maybe five or six months. Staff member E stated the bathtub was not being used by residents. She stated the only…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $340K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT