River Ridge Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC
1415 Yellowstone River Rd, Billings, MT 59105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 129 certified beds · (406) 245-9330 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,893 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-01)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.3% | 18.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 2.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 5.6% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 4.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 15.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 93.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 6.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.3% | 24.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.9% | 20.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.1% | 19.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 14.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.38 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 2.16 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 32.8–54.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.4–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.3–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from neglect for 2 (#s 1 and 15) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice of neglect contributed to skin breakdown and psychosocial harm and pain for 1 (#15) and psychosocial harm to 1 (#1) of the 17 sampled. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/31/24 at 9:47 a.m., resident #15 stated staff member F refused to change his brief. Resident #15 stated NF4 came in during the evening and was very upset he had not been changed. Resident #15 stated he needed frequent brief changes due to medications he had been given for constipation. Resident #15 stated staff member F told him, I'm not changing your diaper again until shift change, when he asked to be changed for the second time after breakfast. Resident #15 stated, It's an awful feeling to go in a diaper and sit in it all day. It happened at breakfast, and I was not changed until [NF4] came in the evening. Resident #15 stated he was also left in his wheelchair, in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an Unstageable pressure injury for 1 (#38) of 2 sampled residents with wounds Findings include: During an interview and observation on 10/23/23 at 2:40 p.m., resident #38 stated she had gotten a new bed because she had a blister on her heel. She stated it did hurt if she tried to walk. She had bed slippers on her feet, which were on the floor, with no pressure reduction in place for the left heel During an observation on 10/24/23 at 10:41 a.m., resident #38 was lying in bed with no pillow or pressure relieving boots for her left heel. During an observation and interview, on 10/24/23, at 2:43 p.m., staff member B removed the boot, and took the sock off resident #38's left foot. There was a dressing in place on the heel, which was stuck to the resident's sock. Removal of the dressing showed drainage from the pressure injury. Staff member B stated the injury could not be left open to air because of the drainage, and the pressure injury was currently Unstageable. It was the first time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and follow interventions for a severe weight loss for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 10/24/23 at 9:08 a.m., resident #6 was sitting in bed, alone with the door to her room closed, and her breakfast tray in front of her. The plate was full of food she was pushing around with her fork. She stated today's breakfast was one of the better ones because the staff usually dropped her tray off while she was asleep, and it would be cold when she woke up to eat. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 8:37 a.m., resident #6 used her call light to notify the CNA that she was done with her tray. Her plate remained full of food. The aide did not ask the resident if she wanted an alternative or a snack. Review of resident #6's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 7/20/23, showed she was marked as needing supervision for eating. Review of resident #6's care plan, revision date 7/16/23, showed: Focus: The resident has unplanned/unexpected weight loss r/t [related to]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food labeling and storage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and failed to maintain sanitary and clean conditions including employee hygiene. These deficient practices affected all residents receiving food services from the facility kitchen and dietary staff. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the kitchen on 1/12/26 at 12:40 p.m., the following conditions were present:- The kitchen floor was soiled with white, brown, and black debris resembling crumbs and dirt. It did not appear to have been cleaned for some time. At the edge of the floor, where the floor met the wall, a dark brown substance was present which had not been cleaned.- Underneath the counter tops, against the farthest wall from the kitchen entrance, there were shelves that had white, tan, and brown debris resembling crumbs and dirt, and there were clean containers and work equipment stored on the shelves, although the shelves were not kept clean. - Underneath the workstation, across from two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-15 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of staff COVID-19 vaccine status and ensure staff were provided information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include:During an interview on 1/15/26 at 10:19 a.m., staff member H stated she and staff member B divided up the Infection Preventionist duties. Staff member H stated staff member B was responsible for the COVID-19 vaccination status of staff at the facility.During an interview on 1/15/26 at 12:22 p.m., staff member B stated the facility did not maintain documentation of the staff COVID-19 vaccine status. Staff member B stated when new employees went through the onboarding process they were asked to provide documentation of their COVID-19 vaccine status. New employees were verbally told the facility did not offer the COVID-19 vaccine and if they wanted it, they could go to a pharmacy to get it. Staff member B stated she did not maintain a comprehensive list of the COVID-19 vaccine status of employees or document whether or not the staff member had received it or not. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective social services were provided to a resident needing assistance in accessing social security disability benefits for 1 (#79) of 29 sampled residents. The failure resulted in prolonged financial stress for the resident in excess of one year's time, and multiple staff were aware of the resident's need for assistance, but failed to intervene, showing a pattern of not addressing the resident's need for help. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 2:12 p.m., resident #79 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Resident #79's right hand was missing four fingers and was severely contracted at the thumb and wrist. Resident #79's speech was slightly muffled, with a delayed speech pattern. Resident #79 stated she had been at the facility approximately 14 months, and stated she was at the facility due to drug abuse, Parkinson's disease, and was unable to care for herself. Resident #79 stated she had been trying for a long time to obtain access to her social security…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive investigations of facility reported incidents were completed for 2 (#s 67 and 99) and failed to ensure post-incident interventions were implemented to prevent additional similar incidents for 1 (#67) of 29 sampled residents. These deficient practices increased the risk of an adverse outcomes for the residents involved in the facility reported incidents. Findings include: 1. Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/27/25, showed resident #67 exited the building through an alarmed door, which a facility vendor had opened. Resident #67 remained outside of the facility until another family member reported the concern to a staff member. Staff were unaware that resident #67 was not in the building. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 11:03 a.m., staff member A stated their video surveillance showed resident #67 exited the facility through an alarmed entrance door, in his wheelchair, by a vendor who was at the facility. Therefore, the alarm was not triggered on the door.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the written transfer notice for a resident sent to the hospital showing the need for the transfer, for 1 (#44) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/13/26 at 11:35 a.m., resident #44 stated he remembered being hospitalized a couple of times in 2025. Resident #44 stated he did not remember getting any paperwork prior to being transferred to the hospital.Review of resident #44's Notice of Discharge/Transfer, dated 7/22/25, failed to show the reason for the transfer. The form showed the resident's name at the top, with his signature and date on the bottom. The line for Need that cannot be met: was blank.During an interview on 1/15/26 at 10:45 a.m., staff member E stated she was working on the day resident #44 was transferred to the hospital (7/22/25) for care. Staff member E stated she signed and dated the form but could not explain why the reason for the transfer was not completed.Review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA), dated 4/11/25, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessments for 2 (#s 6 and 67) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include:1. During an observation on 1/13/26 at 8:45 a.m., resident #6 was wheeled into the dining room for breakfast. Resident #6 was assisted with set up of her breakfast items and was able to feed herself independently. Review of resident #6's weight measurement, dated 11/17/25, showed she weighed 235 pounds at the time she was admitted to the facility. Review of resident #6's weight measurement, dated 12/1/25, showed the resident weighed 222 pounds. The 13-pound decrease calculated to 5.5% of her total weight. Review of resident #6's 5-day MDS Assessment, with an ARD of 12/1/25, failed to trigger unplanned weight loss. During an interview on 1/15/26 at 12:28 p.m., staff member D stated she completed the 5-day MDS Assessment (ARD 12/1/25) for resident #6. Staff member D stated she calculated the resident's percentage of weight loss incorrectly and therefore failed to trigger unplanned weight loss. Staff member D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect a resident's current care needs after an elopement for 1 (#67) of 29 sampled residents. The failure placed the resident at elevated risk for additional elopements. Findings include:Review of the facility's investigation of a Facility-Reported Incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/27/25, showed resident #67 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge.During an interview on 1/13/26 at 11:03 a.m., staff member A stated resident #67 exited the facility through an alarmed door that had been deactivated by a facility vendor. Staff member A stated resident #67's care plan was updated after the Interdisciplinary Team meeting to include the elopement risk, and interventions to prevent similar events in the future.During an observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 1:22 p.m., resident #67 was lying in bed, looking out the window. Resident #67 stated he did not recall the elopement incident, but stated, I would like to go outside.During an interview on 1/14/26 at 11:22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to resident needs timely for a resident requiring assistance with activities of daily living for 1 (#99) of 29 sampled residents. The deficient practice increased the risk for skin integrity issues. Findings include:Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, dated 6/5/25 at 8:40 a.m., showed staff member O found resident #99 lying in his bed in urine-soaked clothing and a soiled brief. This was discovered by staff members O and L after shift change report was completed with NF3, who was a night shift staff member responsible for resident #99's care.During an interview on 1/15/26 at 12:18 p.m., staff member L stated she was one of the day shift staff members who started providing morning cares for assigned residents on 6/5/25, which included resident #99. Staff member L stated NF3, an off going night shift staff member, provided information in report. Staff member L stated before she left, NF3 did not mention resident #99 needed to have his brief and clothes changed. Staff member L stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize a documented weight severe weight loss and address the weight change, for 1 (#6) of 29 sampled residents, which placed the resident at risk for adverse health consequences. The MDS was not correctly completed to reflect the weight, and the weight loss was suspected to be due to an error, not an actual loss of weight, as reflected in the medical record. Findings include:During an observation on 1/13/26 at 8:45 a.m., resident #6 was wheeled into the dining room for breakfast. Resident #6 was assisted with the set-up of her breakfast items and was able to feed herself independently.Review of resident #6's weights since admission showed the following:- 11/17/25, weight 235 pounds,- 12/1/25, weight 222 pounds, and- 12/16/25, weight 211.5 pounds.The weight loss of 13 pounds from 11/17/25 to 12/1/25 calculated to a 5.5% severe weight loss in 14 days. The total weight lost between 11/17/25 and 12/16/25 calculated to a 10% severe weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the staff member administering medications failed to follow proper processes, and this contributed to the facility's failure to prevent a total medication error rate of five percent or less during medication administration observations for 2 (#s 25 and 74) of 4 sampled residents for medications. This deficient practice increased the risk of residents #25 and #74 experiencing negative physical and psychosocial outcomes related to medication errors. Findings include:The facility's medication error rate was 7.69%, with three errors observed in 39 opportunities.1. During an observation and interview on 1/14/26 at 8:28 a.m., staff member J administered resident #74's ordered morning medications. Staff member J administered resident #74 his oral medications and then administered an eye drop into each eye. Staff member J was asked what the label read on the white eye drop bottle she used to administer the eye drops. The eye drop bottle had a different resident's name on the label, with the medication labeled Artificial Tears. The drops…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and provide rehabilitation therapy ordered by a physician for 1 (#34) of 29 sampled residents, which increased the risk of a decline for the resident related to the areas therapy should have been treating. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 2:12 p.m., resident #34 was sitting up in a motorized wheelchair in his room. When asked how things were going, resident #34 said they would be a lot better if he was getting therapy. Resident #34 said he was not sure why he had not been getting therapy, but he thought maybe it had something to do with his Medicaid application (which was pending).During an interview on 1/14/26 at 10:18 a.m., staff member F stated she did not know anything about resident #34's therapy until she received a request to evaluate him on 1/13/26. Staff member F stated she did the therapy evaluation at 8:00 p.m. on 1/13/26. Staff member F stated she did not know why the evaluation was not completed sooner. Staff member F stated a therapy evaluation could be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed safe and sanitary conditions by donning hair coverings and beard nets while preparing resident meals in the facility kitchen. This failure put all residents receiving meals at risk for sanitation issues related to the uncovered hair if it were to get into food. Findings include: During an observation on 3/24/25 at 4:38 p.m., staff member I was in the facility kitchen, not wearing a hair covering or beard net. Staff member I was working at the kitchen grill and preparing food on a serving area. During an observation on 3/25/25 at 7:50 a.m., staff member I was in the facility kitchen, not wearing a hair covering or beard net. Staff member I was dishing food from a pan, onto a plate, preparing breakfast for residents. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 2:15 p.m., staff member D stated dietary staff working in the kitchen are expected to wear hair coverings and a beard net if they have facial hair. Staff member D stated staff member I moved into the cooking role recently and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure an interdisciplinary team was involved in determining if a resident was safe to self-administer medication and failed to implement a system to ensure an as needed medication was secured in a resident's room for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practiced caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/25/25 at 4:10 p.m., resident #6 was in her room sitting in a wheelchair. Resident #6 stated she had limited mobility in her extremities because of multiple health conditions and required assistance with daily care. Resident #6 was observed to have minimal movement in her hands and was unable to lift her arms. Resident #6 stated in late January 2025, staff member E spoke to her about a medication called Blu Emu cream for muscle soreness. Resident #6 stated a nurse left a sample of the Blu Emu cream in a 30cc plastic medication cup on her bedside table and told her to use it when she needed it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of practice by not providing safe administration of a scheduled topical medication for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 4:10 p.m., resident #6 stated on 1/29/25 staff member K brought a plastic 30cc medication cup into her room. Resident #6 stated the medication cup contained a white cream the medical provider had ordered for her due to skin irritation under her left and right underarms. Resident #6 stated staff member K administered her oral medication but left the cream on her bedside table for the certified nursing assistant to apply to the affected area when she went to bed for the evening. Resident #6 stated staff member J helped her prepare for bed around 11:30 p.m. on 1/29/25. Resident #6 requested staff member J apply the cream under her arms. Resident #6 stated after staff member J applied the cream to her right underarm she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff members followed appropriate protocols for the safe transfer of residents while using a Hoyer lift for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility grievance, dated 1/29/25, showed resident #6 reported staff member J used a Hoyer lift, without assistance from another staff member, to transfer her to bed from her wheelchair, when providing care at night. During an interview on 3/26/25 at 9:05 a.m., staff member B stated newly hired nursing staff received education on lifts. Staff member B stated the facility requires two staff when using lifts for resident transfers. Staff member B stated there was a nursing in-service meeting in September 2024, which included lift training. Staff member B stated staff member P provided education on appropriate lift protocols for resident transfers to staff member J. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 9:19 a.m., staff member J stated the facility was strict about having two staff transfer a resident with lifts. Staff member J stated the facility required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure safe administration of a scheduled topical medication for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm. Findings include: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 4:10 p.m., resident #6 stated on 1/29/25 at approximately 11:30 p.m., staff member J helped her prepare for bed. Resident #6 requested staff member J apply a cream under her arms due to irritation she had been experiencing the last two days. Resident #6 stated after staff member J applied the cream to her right underarm she started to feel a burning sensation. Staff member J then applied a cold cloth to her underarm, but she had no relief. Resident #6 said she asked staff member J to go and get the nurse and also asked him if he had applied the white cream, and he responded, No, it was blue. Resident #6 stated staff member J then washed her underarms with soap and warm water which provided relief from the burning sensation. Resident #6 stated staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution practices were utilized by staff while performing high-contact resident care during a transfer, for 1 (#5) of 9 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 3/25/25 at 3:32 p.m., staff member N and staff member L transferred resident #5 in his room from the bed to his wheelchair. Staff member N and staff member L had gloves on before they started to transfer resident #5 with the sit-to-stand lift. Staff member N and staff member L did not don gowns prior to the transfer. Staff member N and staff member L's uniforms had direct contact with resident #5's upper and lower body during his transfer with the sit-to-stand lift. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 3:44 p.m., resident #5 stated nursing staff wear gowns and gloves when they perform his catheter care, but not when he is transferred with the sit-to-stand lift. During an interview on 3/26/25 at 9:15 a.m., staff member B stated she was the infection preventionist for the facility, and she provided education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by failing to label and date food stored in the facility's walk-in cooler and nutrition room refrigerators; failed to prevent or clean dirty surfaces in the walk-in cooler; and failed to maintain or complete routine monitoring of refrigerators and freezers on the Rosebud Hall, which could negatively affect any resident receiving services related to, or foods from, the equipment or areas of concern identified. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 11/4/24 at 12:16 p.m., the following were observed in the walk-in cooler: - Cheese slices wrapped in plastic wrap, not labeled or dated. - Cool whip opened with no date on it and not covered. - A square tub of red liquid, no label or date on it. - Walk-in cooler floors had splatter marks and debris on them. - The bottom shelves in the walk-in cooler had spill marks and debris. During an observation on 11/6/24 at 7:32 a.m., a tub of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices which included: proper hand hygiene for 4 (#s 3, 11, 17, and 20); proper use of isolation masks; disinfecting equipment after use; environmental cleanliness for 1 (#14); enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#20); and dietary infection control of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Hand Hygiene During an observation on 11/6/24 at 9:38 a.m., staff member I and staff member Q were changing a brief for resident #3, who was to receive medication administered via tube feeding after the brief change. Staff members I and Q did not change gloves or use hand hygiene after removing the dirty brief and before putting a clean shirt on the resident. The shirt covered the feeding tube site on resident #3's abdomen. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:50 a.m., staff member I stated there were usually glove boxes on the walls in a resident's room. She stated she will grab a pair of gloves from the box, and lay a clean pair on the bed, when changing a resident's brief. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the reason for a facility-initiated transfer to a resident or the resident's representative, for 3 (#s 18, 64, and 78) of 36 sampled residents, and staff were not aware of the process or need for completion of the transfer notices. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #18's medical record showed the resident was transported to the hospital for an acute change in condition on 11/7/23 and 8/19/24. The medical record failed to show the required written notice of the reason for the transfer was provided to the resident or representative. During an interview on 11/6/24, staff member L stated she was unfamiliar with the federal regulation and facility policy for written resident notification of transfer. Staff member L stated, Well, we do tell them they are going to the hospital, and we complete a transfer form for the receiving hospital, but I am unfamiliar with any form or document that needs to be filled out for the residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required bed hold notice to the resident or the resident's representatives prior to, or timely after, a transfer, for 3 (#s 18, 64, and 78) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #18's medical record showed the resident was transported to the hospital for acute changes in condition on 11/7/23 and 8/19/24. There was no documentation in the medical record to show the resident or his representative was provided or notified of the required written bed hold notice. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 2:10 p.m., staff member L stated, I guess I don't know who is responsible for the bed hold documentation or how that (process) works. I have seen them in the record once in a while, but I have never completed one. A request for bed hold notifications for resident #18's hospital transfers on 11/7/23 and 8/19/24 was requested on 11/6/24. No bed hold notification documentation was received for the transfers prior to the end of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a qualified activity professional to direct the activity program, which may affect all residents receiving or participating in activities at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 11:52 a.m., staff member F stated she was hired in September (2024), has not completed, and was not currently enrolled in an activities professional training program. Review of staff member F's resume showed she did not meet the minimum qualifications to direct the activity program.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to sufficiently and accurately document pressure ulcers for 3 (#s 11, 57, and 76) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: a. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 12:16 p.m., resident #57 stated, I'm hurting. Resident #57 had stated she needed to be cleaned up as she had a bowel movement about 30 minutes ago. Review of resident #57's EHR showed Morphine Sulfate 20 mg/mL and Tramadol 50 mg was available PRN. During an observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 12:25 p.m., resident #57 had a previous 4x4 optifoam dressing and a wound to her coccyx. Staff member M stated she did not have this wound a month ago when staff member M last saw resident #57. When asking both staff members what the redness and raised bumps were to resident #57's right thigh, staff member J stated they would have to check with the nurse as they did not typically work on this wing. Staff member M stated they thought it looked like a rash. Staff member M stated they had seen slight redness to this area the last time they worked with resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, for 2 (#s 3 and 20); failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#20); and failed to measure and record the total fluid volume administered for 2 (#s 3 and 20) of 2 sampled residents with a PEG tube. Findings include: 1. During an interview and observation, on 11/6/24 at 9:16 a.m., staff member H was administering medications to resident #3 through a PEG tube. Staff member H measured the individual fluid amounts, but was not observed to write down a final total fluid volume. During the medication administration, staff member H had given a -30 mL (initial flush) of water. Staff member H stated she felt resistance when flushing #3's PEG tube, but stated this was normal. Staff member H stated she had held the tube feed prior to the medication administration, as resident #3 had not been tolerating the tube feeds. Staff member H was observed to administer fluid amounts of: -15 mL (with medications) -15 mL -15 mL (with medications) -15 mL -15 mL (with medications) During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored; failed to properly dispose of expired medications; failed to ensure medication carts were locked when staff was not by them; and failed to monitor medication refrigerator and freezer temperatures. These failures could negatively affect a resident receiving improperly stored or expired medications, or from the refrigerator or freezer if temperatures were not maintained in a safe manner. Findings include: During an observation on 11/6/24 at 10:48 a.m., a medication cart had scattered loose pills on the top shelf where stock medication bottles were stored. The medication cart had the following opened and undated medication containers and bottles: - Stool softener docusate 100 mg, - Vitamin B Complex, - Zinc 50 mg, - Folic Acid 1000 mcg, - Senna 8.6 mg, - Aspirin 325 mg, - Milk of Magnesia opened with a date of 6/3/24, and - Mylanta opened with a date of 7/5/24. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 10:52 a.m., staff member L stated when staff opened over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely fix items in resident's rooms for 2 (#s 17, and 44) of 36 sampled residents; and failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff in the Rosebud nursing unit area of the building. Findings include: During an interview on 11/4/24 at 2:51 p.m., resident #44 stated the curtains in his room were broken for over a year. Resident #44's curtains were not able to twist which would allow for more or less light to come in through the window. Resident #44 stated the ability to have functional curtains would be beneficial. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 2:36 p.m., resident #17 stated her windowsill was broken forever. Resident #17 stated she had been in the facility for over two years and the windowsill was broken when she had moved in. Resident #17 stated she had told many staff members about this issue. During an interview and observation on 11/6/24 at 11:41 a.m., staff member G stated other staff members would text staff member G through the WhatsApp or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 (#14) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 11/5/24 at 9:56 a.m., there was a dried, crusty brown substance near an electrical outlet on the wall next to resident #14's bed. There was a visible large amount of white, dried crusted substance on the top blanket of resident #14's bedding. During an observation on 11/5/24 at 2:29 p.m., there was still a dried, crusty brown substance near an electrical outlet on the wall next to resident #14's bed. During an observation on 11/6/24 at 8:52 a.m., there was still a dried, crusty brown substance near an electrical outlet on the wall next to resident #14's bed. There was a dried sticky area of debris on the floor alongside resident #14's bed, which was seen and heard when walking on the section of the floor. The privacy curtain next to resident #14's recliner had dark brown, dried stains on it. During an observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 9:43 a.m., staff member Q observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences within 14 days of admission for 1 (#233) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 2:10 p.m., resident #233 was observed to have wounds on both legs and the left arm. Resident #233 was eating lunch and her left hand was laying in the food on her plate. Resident #233 stated, I have trouble eating sometimes, but it is getting better. Review of a facility provided document titled Matrix, resident #233 did not trigger for any medical conditions including wounds. Review of resident #233's medical record showed resident #233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The ARD for the completion of the comprehensive admission MDS assessment was 8/22/24. The comprehensive admission MDS assessment was open and showed in progress. This assessment should have been completed and submitted within 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the resident's oral status, for 1 (#8) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 2:02 p.m., resident #8 was observed to have no natural teeth and no dentures. Resident #8 stated she did not have teeth when she was admitted to the facility, as she had them removed around July of 2024, and had not yet had dentures fitted. Resident #8 stated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:06 a.m., staff member E stated resident #8 did not have teeth on admission to the facility and has had several appointments for denture fittings since her admission. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 2:25 p.m., staff member D stated she was responsible for MDS assessments and was in the process of getting all the resident MDS information updated and accurate. Staff member D stated the MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan which identified the resident's physical and psychosocial needs to help the resident reach their highest practicable level, for 1 (#8) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 2:02 p.m., resident #8 was observed to have no natural teeth and no dentures. Resident #8's voice was impaired by the absence of teeth, with difficulty making s and t sounds. Resident #8 stated she was embarrassed by not having teeth, and stated, I feel like people don't like me because I look funny without my teeth, and I am hard to understand. I am supposed to be getting dentures, but it is taking a while because I guess I have some jaw problems. The dentist fitted me a couple of times but so far, no teeth. I am hoping maybe by Thanksgiving. Resident #8 also stated she had some difficulty eating, even with the bite-sized diet the facility was providing. Resident #8 was also observed during this interview to be wearing one hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise an individualized comprehensive care plan to reflect a mental health diagnosis, for 1 (#233) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #233's physician's order, dated 10/3/24, showed, Please call to schedule appt with Encounter Telehealth Psychiatry for bipolar disorder, depression. [sic] Review of resident #233's care plan, with an initiation date of 9/3/24, failed to show any information for a Focus, Goals, or Interventions for a diagnosis of bipolar depression. Review of the most recent H&P, dated 1/30/24, showed bipolar depression as an active diagnosis for resident #233. Review of resident #233's medical record, showed the facility submitted a letter requesting a PASARR Level II for resident #233 on 9/13/24, due to a history of bipolar depression. No further documentation was provided by the end of the survey period to show a PASARR Level II was performed. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 12:34 p.m., staff member D stated resident care plans should be completed upon admission, quarterly, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a trauma-informed assessment to identify, manage, avoid potential triggers, and maintain the highest practicable well-being, for 1 (#8) of 1 resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Findings include: During an interview on 11/4/24 at 2:02 p.m., resident #8 stated she did have a PTSD diagnosis related to so much abuse. Resident #8 stated she gets nightmares pretty regularly, and stated no one from the facility had talked to her about her PTSD since she was admitted . During an interview on 11/6/24 at 4:10 p.m., Staff member K stated she did not think a trauma informed assessment was necessary for resident #8, as the PTSD diagnosis was not included in the PASARR Level II evaluation, and the PTSD was not an active diagnosis. Review of resident #8's PASARR Level II evaluation, dated 10/22/24, showed resident #8 had a history of abuse as a child that still affected her. Review of a psychiatric telehealth note, dated 10/30/24, showed resident #8 was seen for an initial consultation for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the Director of Nursing did not work as a charge nurse when the average daily census was more than 60 residents, which may negatively affect any resident. Findings include: Review of the facility nursing schedules showed staff member B was scheduled to work as charge nurse on the following days: . 4/27/24 on day shift from 6-12 . 4/28/24 on day shift from 3-6 . 10/4/24 on night shift from 10-6 Review of the [Facility Name] Daily Nursing Staff Posting and Census showed the census on 4/27/24 was 69, on 4/28/24 the census was 69, and on 10/4/24 the census was 76. Review of a Facility Assessment Tool, Date(s) of assessment or update 9/26/24 - 10/17/24, showed, . Part 1: Our Resident Profile . 1.2. Indicate your average daily census: (enter a range) _ 74.5_. [sic] During an interview on 11/7/24 at 8:53 a.m., staff member B stated, This last week and half I had to work on the floor more, but this was the last week. The facility was going to hire two more nurses, then I should not have to work the floor (as a charge nurse).
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 (#17) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/4/24 at 2:36 p.m., resident #17 stated she felt she had a cracked wisdom tooth. Resident #17 stated she was not aware of an appointment made for her, but she had told many of the staff about her tooth concerns. When asked, resident #17 stated staff have not asked her if she needed dental, hearing, or eye appointments regularly scheduled. During an interview on 11/7/24 at 9:26 a.m., staff member E stated they were aware of resident #17's need for a dental cleaning appointment, but they were not aware of an issue concerning resident #17's wisdom tooth. Staff member E stated the appointment had been communicated to staff member P, as staff member P made the appointments. When staff member E looked for the scheduled appointment, and the communication text to staff member P, staff member E was unable to find the information. Staff member E stated they must have told staff member P verbally that resident #17 needed a dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the dietary department failed to have sufficient staffing to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutritional services department, by serving meals cold and late. This failure may negatively affect any resident receiving services from the dietary department. Findings include: During an observation and interview, on 11/4/24 at 12:16 p.m., staff member S was serving trays to residents in the dining room. Staff member S stated, I would walk around with you, but I am in the middle of serving. A dietary staff member showed the surveyor where the dry storage was kept, and stated, We are so short staffed. Why is it so hard to get people to work nowadays? Review of a facility document titled, Yellowstone Dining Room Meal Service Times, showed: Breakfast 7:45 a.m. Lunch 11:45 a.m. Dinner 4:45 p.m. During an observation on 11/05/24 at 8:01 a.m., residents were in the dining room waiting to be served breakfast. During an observation on 11/05/24 at 8:15 a.m., residents were still in the dining room waiting to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had the necessary certification for oversight of the infection control program. This failure would affect any resident who had an infection, was at risk of an infection, or for how the facility upheld and monitored infection prevention strategies. Findings include: During an observation on 11/6/24 at 3:41 p.m., staff member D stated she worked at the facility starting in February 2024. Staff member D stated she completed the infection preventionist certification in 2019, but due to a tornado in another state, she was were unable to find the certification. Review of the facility request sheet, dated 11/7/24 at 9:53 a.m., showed the facility documented, Infection Preventionist Certification. No certification or supporting information was provided to the survey team prior to the end of the survey.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal and Covid-19 vaccine for 1 (#74) of 7 sampled residents for immunizations. Findings include: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 3:41 p.m., staff member D stated all immunizations were documented in the EHR, and there was no other documentation located outside of the EHR, concerning immunizations. Review of a facility provided document, titled Consent Form For Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated 9/24/24, showed resident #74 had consent given for the vaccine. Review of a facility provided document, titled Consent Form For SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccine, dated 9/24/24, showed consent given for Covid-19 vaccine for resident #74. Review of resident #74's EHR showed no record of Covid-19 or pneumococcal vaccines given. The resident immunization record were requested on 11/7/24 at 9:53 a.m.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act promptly to resolve grievances brought forth by residents; provide access to allow residents to file grievances anonymously; take immediate action to protect and prevent further potential violations of any resident rights or potential abuse; and ensure a thorough investigation into the grievances were completed and documented for 6 (#s 1, 6, 9, 10, 15, and 16) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 3:30 p.m., NF2 reported resident #1 was not treated with dignity and respect during her stay at the facility beginning 5/2/24. NF2 stated resident #1's call lights were not answered on multiple occasions during the weekend, she was left in her hospital gown for five days, there was no hot water for a bath, and the facility did not give her a refund within the 30-day requirement. NF2 reported when she arrived on 5/6/24, resident #1 was crying and depressed. NF2 stated she and NF3 requested immediate discharge from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents who voiced concerns related to alleged abuse or neglect of care; failed to report neglect allegations to the State Survey Agency within the required 24 hours for 3 (#s 1, 14, 15); and failed to report the investigative findings of their reported incidents to the State Survey Agency within five days for 3 (#s 5, 8, 16) of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility reported incident, dated 7/2/24, showed a resident to resident altercation occurred for resident #5. Investigative findings were not reported until 7/8/24, one day out of the reporting window. 2. During an interview on 7/31/24 at 11:12 a.m., NF4 stated resident #15 had not had his brief changed for approximately 13 hours, and was left in a feces filled brief all day. NF4 stated she complained to the nurse on duty when she returned and found resident #15 had not had his brief changed. NF4 stated his brief was overflowing with feces. During an interview on 7/31/24 at 9:17 a.m., staff member C stated she reported resident #15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refund a resident representative within 30 days of the resident's date of discharge for 1 (#1) of 3 reviewed for timely refunds at discharge. Findings include: During an interview on 7/30/24 at 3:30 p.m., NF2 stated the facility had not sent a refund check to her until 6/19/24. Review of resident #1's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], reflected resident #1 was discharged on 5/6/24. Review of a facility provided refund check, dated 6/10/24, reflected NF2 cashed the check on 6/21/24. Review of the facility's Standard Admissions Agreement, revised 3/1/19, reflected: -Refunds - .Refunds will be made within thirty (30) days of the Resident's death, transfer, or discharge.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately assessed to be outside independently, and failed to ensure residents were inside the facility at night for 1(#13) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm to a resident driving their wheelchair down a dark road. Findings include: Review of resident #13's nursing progress notes, dated 7/21/24, showed, Patient with new scooter and outside privileges. Routine monitoring while patient is outside. Nurse does not feel patient is safe to be outside, he was given privileges to go outside by another staff member . Review of resident #13's nursing progress notes, dated 7/27/24, showed the resident was outside driving his motorized scooter down the road. A motorist called the facility asking if they had lost a resident, and there was a car and motorcycle following the motorized scooter. During an interview on 8/1/24 at 10:25 a.m., staff member B stated resident #13 had left the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion or mobility received the restorative services necessary to maintain their highest level of functioning for 4 (#s 1, 3, 8, and 13) of 4 residents sampled for restorative services and mobility. Findings include: A request was made on 4/23/24 for a list of all residents who were supposed to be receiving restorative services. A list of 16 residents who received restorative services was provided on 7/23/24. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 10:38 a.m., when asked how she ensured residents received restorative services as needed, staff member D stated she could not tell which residents received these services or when these services were provided. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:10 a.m., staff member H stated she was not sure how restorative services were provided when the RA (Restorative Aide) was pulled to work the floor due to staffing shortages. Staff member H stated she thought there were tasks in the EHR associated with restorative services so CNAs could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staffing available to allow for the consistent provision of restorative nursing services for 4 (#s 1, 3, 8, and 13) of 16 sampled residents receiving restorative services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident identified as needing restorative nursing services. Findings include: During an interview on 4/25/24 at 10:38 a.m., staff member D stated the facility had a Restorative Aide who was often pulled from the provision of restorative services to work the floor because of short staffing. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:10 a.m., staff member H stated it has been challenging to ensure restorative services are consistently provided. Staff member H stated this was because the Restorative Aide frequently got pulled to work and provide resident care rather than providing restorative services. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:15 a.m., staff member E stated when the Restorative Aide is pulled to work the floor, there is no one else to provide restorative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, a staff member failed to provide necessary care and services for a dependent resident, for 1 (#19) of 19 sampled residents. The deficient practice caused the resident to initially be upset and tearful. Findings include: A review of a Facility-Reported Incident, submitted to the State Survey Agency, dated 3/22/24, showed resident #19 reported a staff member refused to assist him with getting out of bed to a chair. The resident also asked the staff member to get his call light. The staff member refused. Resident #19 stated the staff member stretched his urinary catheter tubing, causing discomfort. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:10 a.m., staff B stated he investigated the allegation made by resident #19 and determined the staff member did not assist resident #19. Staff member B stated the staff member voluntarily resigned and did not return to work. A review of resident #19's admission MDS, with an ARD of 3/13/24, showed the resident needed assistance with his Activities of Daily Living (ADL), such as partial to moderate, or substantial to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare food in sanitary conditions, putting residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: During a observation on 10/23/23 at 3:00 p.m., the kitchen showed large, dried meat on the meat slicer. The can opener was covered with old sticky food debris. The microwave had food splatters. The steam table had crumbs and food debris on and around it. The floor was dirty with old lids, napkins, and crumbs. The dishwasher appeared to have caked on debris on the tank. The dishwasher racks were stained and black. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 9:40 a.m., staff member M stated she had implemented a cleaning schedule for staff on Wednesday 10/18/23, but did not know if the staff had started to clean, based on the new schedule.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine bathing for dependent residents for 4 (#s 2, 6, 27, and 44) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 8:20 a.m., resident #44 stated the shower aide was frequently moved from helping with resident showers to work the floor. She stated, You don't always get your shower. Review of resident #44's bathing records, dated August 2023 to October 2023, showed: - Resident #44 had a shower on 8/23/23, documented as, Physical help in part of bathing .one-person physical assist. - Resident #44 went 21 days until her next shower on 9/14/23. She received one additional shower in September, 13 days later on 9/28/23. - Resident #44 went 17 days between her last September shower and her October shower dated 10/16/23. - Resident #44 has had one shower in October of 2023. - There was no documentation that showed a bed bath had occurred during the intervals without a shower. 2. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 9:08 a.m., resident #6 stated she often went two weeks between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (#205) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 10:57 a.m., resident #205 stated she had not filled out an advanced directive since her admission on [DATE]. Resident #205 stated she was very familiar with advanced directives and would have liked to fill one out. Resident #205 was adamant she did not want to be resuscitated or to receive any life support. When asked if the facility had discussed completing an advanced directive, resident #205 replied, No, never. When asked how the facility knew resident #205's resuscitation preference, resident #205 replied, They don't. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:38 a.m., staff member C was asked how the facility would know a resident's advanced directive status, and who would be responsible for entering it in the chart. Staff member C stated the advanced directive would be put in the electronic medical record as an order, based on the new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a significant weight loss for 1 (#303) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 10/25/23 at 9:29 a.m., NF3 stated she was not aware of resident #303's weight loss until he was hospitalized on [DATE]. NF3 stated the facility did notify her of resident #303's frequent falls, but nothing regarding the resident's significant weight loss, which was identified on 9/5/23. NF3 stated she was made aware of resident #303's weight loss when the facility called to tell her resident #303 was being transferred to the hospital for care on 9/23/23. NF3 stated if she had known, she would have come to the facility to help him eat. Review of resident #303's weights, dated 7/11/23 and 9/5/23 respectively, showed weights of 165.8 pounds and 152 pounds, which calculated to an 8.32% weight loss in two months, and was a significant weight loss. Review of resident #303's nursing progress notes, dated between 9/5/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to provide privacy by leaving the window blinds open while providing perineal care for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 10/25/23 at 8:11 a.m., staff member H provided perineal care to resident #14 in bed. The blinds of the window in resident #14's room were open, providing no privacy from the parking lot which the window faced. Staff member H then assisted resident #14 from the bed to her wheelchair, while the blinds remained open. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 8:40 a.m., resident #14 stated, People walk back and forth all of the time, outside her window. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 2:39 p.m., staff member C stated the blinds of the windows should be closed when staff were providing care for the residents. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 5:20 p.m., staff member B stated she did not have completed orientation checklists for staff member H or staff member I. Review of the facility document titled, Nursing Competency Checklist, not dated, showed: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate a bruise alleged by the resident to be caused by another individual for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #6's nursing progress notes, dated 6/4/23, showed, [Resident #6] complained to the aide about the bruising on the inside of her right thigh . [Resident #6] explained that someone grabbed her really hard on both thighs, and that's why the bruising was there. The bruising did not look like finger/hand prints . [sic] Review of resident #6's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 7/20/23, showed she had a BIMS of 15, showed intact cognition. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 2:25 p.m., staff member B stated resident #6's bruise and comments should have been reported by the nurse to management so they could be investigated. She stated they did abuse and reporting training with staff monthly.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS within 14 days of a resident's change in condition for 1 (#47) of 1 sampled resident who received hospice services. Findings include: During an interview on 10/25/23 at 2:56 p.m., staff member C stated a Significant Change MDS was completed two months late, for resident #47 on 6/5/23. Staff member C stated that she was new to her position and did not know the resident was receiving hospice services. Review of resident #47's medical record showed a physician order for hospice services on 4/05/23. Review of resident #47's MDS showed an admission assessment completed, with an ARD of 3/27/23. The next update to the MDS was a Significant Change assessment with an ARD of 6/5/23. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User ' s Manual, October 2023, For Use Effective October 1, 2023, showed: An SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 (#205 and #304) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 11:39 a.m., resident #304 stated she was admitted to the facility a few weeks ago. Resident #304 stated she was not asked her preferences and was not asked to participate in a care plan meeting. NF1, who was seated at resident #304's bedside at the time of the interview, stated he had not been included in any care planning or care need discussion. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 8:12 a.m., staff member B reported staff member C was responsible for initiating the baseline care plan, and care plan updates were completed at IDT meetings. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10:29 a.m., staff member C reported the nursing staff was responsible for completing the baseline care plan. Staff member C provided a document titled, Assessment Names and Documentation Requirements by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to protect a resident's room from being entered by other residents for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include: During an interview on 10/24/23 at 9:08 a.m., resident #6 stated another resident had wandered into her room and used her bathroom. She stated she was worried about someone coming in while she was asleep. Resident #6 stated there was supposed to be a sign on her door to keep other residents out. During an observation on 10/23/23 at 4:45 p.m., there was no stop sign for the doorway of resident #6's room alerting others to keep out. During an observation on 10/24/23 at 9:00 a.m., there was no stop sign for the doorway of resident #6's room alerting others to keep out. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 8:37 a.m., there was no stop sign for the doorway of resident #6's room alerting others to keep out. Review of resident #6's nursing progress notes, dated 6/11/23 and 8/8/23, showed there had been several instances of a man standing directly outside/entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by failing to follow a physician's order to hold insulin for a blood glucose value less than 100 mg/dL for 1 (#2) of 23 sampled residents. Finding include: During an observation on 10/23/23 at 4:42 p.m., staff member K administered an insulin injection to resident #2. Staff member K told resident #2 he was giving her seven units of Humalog insulin. Review of resident #2's physician orders, dated 12/22/22, showed an order for blood glucose checks before meals and at bedtime. The physician orders also showed an order, dated 7/18/23, to give seven units of Humalog insulin before meals and to hold the insulin if the blood sugar was less than 100 mg/dL. Review of resident #2's MAR, dated 10/23/23, showed the blood sugar before supper was 88 mg/dL. The MAR also showed staff member K gave seven units of insulin before supper. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 7:54 a.m., staff member K stated he performed resident #2's blood sugar check before supper on 10/23/23. Staff member K…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to follow a physician's order for a resident's continuous tube feeding administration; failed to label the enteral and free water bags used during the continuous tube feeding; and failed to consistently and accurately document the resident's enteral and free water intake for 1 (#19) of 23 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for inadequate caloric and free water intake. Findings include: 1. Follow Physician Order During an observation on 10/23/23 at 4:21 p.m., resident #19 was lying in her bed with two collapsible fluid bags, attached to the feeding tube pumps, and connected to the resident's gastric feeding tube. Neither of the feeding tube pumps were turned on or infusing any fluid. During a follow-up observation on 10/23/23 at 5:00 p.m., the feeding tube bags were connected to the resident's gastric feeding tube, and the pumps were still not turned on. During an interview on 10/24/23 at 10:29 a.m., staff member K stated resident #19's tube feeding, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an RN scheduled for eight hours per day. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents in the facility receiving nursing services. Findings include: During an interview on 10/25/23 at 2:30 p.m., staff member B stated the DON and ADON alternated being the RN coverage on the weekends. Review of PBJ data, dated FY Quarter 3, showed the facility had submitted no RN coverage for dates: 4/2/23, 4/8/23, 4/15/23, 4/16/23, 4/22/23, 4/29/23, 5/6/23, 5/7/23, 5/13/23, 5/27/23, 5/28/23, and 5/29/23. Review of facility documents titled, Daily Posting of Hours, each dated as listed above, showed a line through the designated RN coverage, indicating no RN hours for the day. Only dates 4/16/23 and 5/7/23 showed RN hours documented as a salary employee in the building.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily staffing numbers. This deficient practice had the potential to leave family and visitors uninformed of the facility's daily census and number of licensed staff members working. Findings include: During an observation on 10/23/23 at 4:45 p.m., staffing numbers were posted on the board near the reception desk. The dates posted were 10/16/23 and 10/22/23. There was no information about resident census or number and license of staff working for the current date. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 11:07 a.m., staffing numbers were posted with a date of 10/24/23. There was no information about resident census or number and license of staff working for the current date. During an observation on 10/26/23 at 7:30 a.m., staffing numbers were posted with a date of 10/24/23. There was no information about resident census or number and license of staff working for the current date. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:15 a.m. staff member G stated the nurses were responsible for posting the information on weekdays and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep a foley catheter and tubing from dragging on the floor, increasing the risk for infection for 1 (#24) of 4 sampled residents; and nursing staff failed to follow infection control standards by placing urine-soaked bed linens on the floor during a bed linen change for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to increase the risk of infection to residents and staff. Findings include: 1.During an observation on 10/24/23 at 9:46 a.m., resident #24 was in the dining room with his catheter bag and the tubing on the floor. During an observation on 10/25/23 at 11:45 a.m., resident #24 continued to have his foley catheter bag and tubing dragging on the floor. During an interview on 10/25/23, at 12:10 p.m., staff member I stated she tried to fix the catheter, and resident #24 freaked out and would not let her adjust it. During an interview on on 10/25/23 at 11:59 a.m., resident #24 agreed his catheter bag should be hung higher, so it was not on the ground. Staff member B did find a solution, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of chemicals in an unlocked closet on the Rosebud unit hallway, and this increased the risk of resident misuse of the chemical due to the closet being unlocked. Findings include: During an observation on 11/6/24 at 3:50 p.m., along the hallway on the Rosebud unit, a housekeeping closet door was closed. The door was unlocked, and the surveyor was able to open the door without the use of a code or key, to enter. There were three chemical containers with hoses, all labled with an Ecolab label. Each had posted warnings and first aid precautions displayed on the container labels. During an observation and interview on 11/7/24 at 8:43 a.m., staff member V stated the housekeeping and janitor supply closets were supposed to be locked when the door was closed and staff were not in the area. Staff member V stated the door was supposed to lock, with a code to open the door, but the door could be opened with a key too. After the interview, staff member V left the Rosebud unit housekeeping closet and closed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post the required staffing each day as required, and failed to ensure any changes in staffing or census were included on the required staff posting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident wishing to view the information. Findings include: Review of the facility's daily staff posting information, dated 1/22/24 through 4/23/24, showed the following dates were missing: 1/22/24, 1/23/24, 1/30/24-2/1/24, 2/12/24-3/8/24, 3/14/24, 3/16/24, 3/24/24, 3/30/24, 4/4/24, 4/6/24, 4/11/24, 4/13/24-4/16/24, 4/18/24-4/19/24, and 4/23/24. The missing daily posting accounted for 45 of the 90 days requested. Of the 45 daily postings received, none of them contained the name of the facility and 11 were missing the number of hours actually worked. Review of the facility's admission report, dated from 1/23/24 through 4/23/24, showed the facility had a total of 74 admissions during the time period. Of the 45 days of posting present, 26 of the days showed at least one admission. Of the 26 days which showed at least one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,893 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $58,728 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
- $1,899 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
- $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
- $16,848 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMIN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/01/2023 |
| MYERS LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 10/01/2023 |
| CASHMER LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| DOVER RUXPIN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| FEY, KRISTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9% | since 10/01/2023 |
| MYERS, CINDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2023 |
| MYERS, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2023 |
| MYERS, SHERI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2023 |
| MYERS, WALTER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2023 |
| SWAIN, JARED | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/04/2025 |
| PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADVISORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/04/2025 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/04/2025 |
| ANDERSON, WENDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| WILLIAMSON, ZACK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $227K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.