No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kalispell Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

171 Heritage Way, Kalispell, MT 59901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (406) 755-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$320,155 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $320,155 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1550 US Highway 93 N · (406) 756-3222 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Conway Dr · (406) 751-7600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1097 US Highway 2 W
Park
(406) 758-7718 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1970 US Highway 93 N · (406) 752-4088

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%18.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%5.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%15.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%93.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%6.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.5%24.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%20.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.2%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.2%19.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.5%14.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.961.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.472.161.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.7%CMS range 38.2–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.7–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting84.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.5–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
38.7%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

85 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility licensed staff member failed to provide necessary services, medically neglecting a resident's care needs, after a significant medication error occurred due to the staff member failing to follow the facility procedures for medication administration, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy level significant medication error, for 1 (#1) resident of 3 sampled residents for medication errors. The resident had a significant decline in health, was unresponsive, had to be given Narcan, and was sent to the ER and had a hospital stay due to the failures identified. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:37 p.m., the facility Regional Director of Operations, Administrator, and Director of Nursing was notified an Immediate Jeopardy situation existed for 1 resident (#1) for F726, Competent Nursing Staff. An acceptable plan for the removal of immediacy was provided on [DATE] at 7:32 p.m. The immediacy was removed on [DATE] at 7:45 p.m. The severity and scope of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to keep 2 (#s 1 and 3) residents free from significant medication errors, of 3 sampled residents for medication errors. This deficiency resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy level deficiency for 1 (#1) resident, and interventions included medication, emergency medical care, and hospitalization, and the deficiency had the potential to cause life threatening side effects for resident #3. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:37 p.m., the facility Regional Director of Operations, Administrator, and Director of Nursing was notified an Immediate Jeopardy situation existed for 1 (#1) resident for F726 - Residents Free from Significant Medication Errors. An acceptable plan for the removal of immediacy was provided on [DATE] at 7:32 p.m. The Immediacy was removed on [DATE] at 7:45 p.m. The scope and severity of the Immediate Jeopardy was identified to be at the level of J, Immediate Jeopardy to Health and Safety, and upon removal of the immediacy, the scope and severity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reposition and facilitate ambulation for 1 (#98) and this deficient practice resulted in the development of an avoidable Stage III pressure ulcer; and the facility failed to provide necessary positioning and repositioning for skin protection and the prevention of wound development, for 3 (#s 2, 71, and 73) of 38 sampled residents. Findings include:1. A review of resident #98's skin and wound care documentation showed the nursing staff identified a reddened area on the resident's coccyx due to pressure on 9/5/25. This reddened area then developed into a Stage III pressure ulcer. During the interview on 3/10/26 at 10:19 a.m., NF3 stated resident #98 had developed wounds while residing at the facility. NF3 stated resident #98 had walked before going into the facility and then was never taken for walks with staff or repositioned, so the resident developed a pressure ulcer on his coccyx. NF3 asked the facility to print papers to remind the staff to turn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to frequently encourage and facilitate ambulation for 1 (#98) of 38 sampled residents, and this contributed to resident #98 losing mobility and becoming bed-bound and developing a Stage III pressure wound. Findings include:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 10:19 a.m., NF3 stated his father was not taken care of at the facility. NF3 stated his father ambulated independently with a walker prior to a fall at home and being admitted to the hospital. NF3 stated the plan for resident #98 was to go to the facility and gain strength in order to go to an assisted living facility. While resident #98 was at the facility, NF3 stated staff would not ambulate resident #98 because he was a high fall risk and sometimes combative. NF3 stated he watched his father ambulate at the facility one time and most of the time they left him in his chair or in bed. NF3 stated resident #98 lost all mobility due to the facility not encouraging him to ambulate. NF3 stated the facility staff members had a very poor dementia approach and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to failed to ensure proper PPE was worn, clean technique was followed, a catheter bag was emptied timely, and catheter perineal care was completed correctly for an indwelling Foley catheter for 1 (#2), and the resident had multiple urinary tract infections in the prior year; and the facility failed to provide a physician ordered catheter change(s), failed to provide proper daily site assessments and a dressing change(s), and failed to empty the catheter drainage bag timely for a resident with a Suprapubic indwelling catheter, for 1 (#15). These deficient practices increased the risk of negative urinary outcomes for all residents receiving catheter services, out of 5 sampled residents for catheter use and care. Findings include:1. During an interview on 3/11/26 at 9:48 a.m., resident #2 stated he did not get catheter care often enough and suffered from facility acquired UTIs often. He stated he was lucky to get clean (catheter care) once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide enough supervision and monitoring of a resident who had a history of falls with injury. The resident resided on the memory care unit, had dementia, and significant cognitive deficits, which hindered her ability to comprehend safety awareness. The resident wandered consistently and had altercations with other residents, and although supervision was in place, it did not meet the resident's safety needs related to her behavior and falls. The resident sustained two major injuries, one was from a known fall, and one was an unknown injury, suspected to be from a fall. The resident's care plan, although it had interventions in place, was not adequate to meet her safety, supervision, and oversight needs related to accidents and hazards, for 1 (#15) of 24 sampled residents. The two major injuries included a compression fracture and a fractured hip, which required surgical repair. Findings include:A review of resident #15's admission Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/13/25, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility and staff failed to provide the supervision and oversight for a resident residing on the memory care unit, who had dementia, poor safety awareness, displayed aggressive behavior towards others, and would wander continuously. On one occasion, the resident went into a room of a fellow resident, was pushed, had a fall, and fractured her hip, as staff were not available and present to stop her from going into the room, for 1 (#15) of 3 residents sampled on the memory care unit; and, this affected 1 (#20) when resident #15 went into her room and punched her in the chest while sleeping, which made the resident afraid. Although the facility did attempt to identify and implement interventions for the resident and her behaviors, they were not adequate to meet the resident's needs. Findings include: A review of resident #15's admission Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/13/25, showed the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 (#1) resident from neglect of medical care by a staff member, when the licensed staff member provided incorrect medications, which was a significant medication error, then failed to properly monitor the resident after the error, and the resident then had a decrease in cognition and change in vital signs. When the decline was identified, the resident had to be given additional medication and was sent to the emergency room and had a hospital stay; the facility also failed to protect two (#s 5 and 7) residents on the memory care unit from having sexual contact without having prior assessment for their ability to consent to sexual contact; and, failed to protect 1 (#10) resident from a resident to resident abuse event which resulted in a resident fall. There were 11 residents in the sample for this investigation. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:59 p.m., staff member H said she gave resident #1 a 10 mg Vicodin and 60 mg OxyContin (High dose of opioid medications that cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 2 (#s 9 and 10) residents from accidents and hazards. Resident #9 sustained eight falls within 17 days, she was sent to the hospital for five of the falls, and had significant injuries for two of the falls. Resident #10 was pushed by another resident and fell to the floor, putting her at risk for injury, due to her wandering, of 11 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #9's EMR, showed resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9's medical record showed: - An alert note documented on 6/23/24 at 12:42 p.m., showed resident #9 was impulsive, forgetful, and was a fall risk. - An Incident note on 6/23/24 at 7:47 p.m., showed resident #9 was found on the floor of her room at 2:00 p.m. - An incident report on 6/23/24 at 7:49 p.m. showed resident #9 was found in her room on the floor, the note showed resident #9 was confused, she was returned to her bed, and given pain medication for low back pain. Resident #9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an environment safe from accidents and hazards, and anticipate and assess the residents needs related to fall prevention, for 1 (#4) of 4 sampled residents, and the resident had a history of falls with significant injury. This deficiency resulted in resident #4 having an unwitnessed fall, with a significant injury, resulting in the resident requiring an additional hospital visit and surgery. Findings include: Review of resident #4's EMR progress notes, as of 10/2/23, showed: - 8/23/23 at 7:07 p.m., the resident was being admitted to the facility after having sustained a fall at home that caused a right femur fracture. The resident needed assistance getting to the bathroom but was continent of bowel and bladder. The resident was too weak to ambulate independently. The resident was in stable condition at the time of admission. - An unwitnessed fall report, dated 8/24/23 at 3:00 a.m., showed the nurse was at the nursing station and heard someone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#1) of 8 sampled residents. The facility failed to administer an anticoagulant medication as ordered, resulting in the omission of 27 doses of Eliquis (Apixaban), increasing the risk for complications including stroke and blood clots; and failed to implement physician-ordered medication hold instructions before a scheduled vascular procedure, resulting in the cancellation and rescheduling of the resident's fistula surgery on two separate occasions and causing the resident frustration. These failures delayed medically necessary treatment. Findings include:1. During an interview on 6/15/26 at 2:28 p.m., NF1 stated she was contacted by the nursing home staff and they informed her they had made an error and had mistakenly taken resident #1 off his blood thinner for a period of time.Review of resident #1's physician's office visit showed resident #1 was to be seen by the vascular physician on 3/5/26 at 1:00 p.m. The physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively and systematically identify, assess, implement, monitor, and modify interventions timely after the identification of facility-acquired pressure injuries, which resulted in the progression of bilateral heel pressure injuries, including the development of an additional pressure injury to the plantar aspect of the left heel for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents for pressure injuries. The facility actions being taken for the wound(s) were not sufficient to meet the resident's needs related to wound care and the prevention of wounds. Findings include:During an interview on [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., NF2 reported that resident #2 had developed wounds on her feet during her stay at the facility.During an interview on [DATE] at 11:55 a.m., NF3 stated that resident #2 had two heel wounds when she assessed the resident on the day of discharge when she was admitted to hospice. NF3 said the wound on the right heel had eschar and odor present, and the left heel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promptly identify, evaluate, and implement interventions to address clinically significant weight loss and nutritional declines for 3 (#s 2, 7, and 5) of 3 sampled for weight loss; and failed to timely notify the resident representative of severe weight loss for 1 (#2) resulting in delayed intervention for a resident who experienced the severe 19.2 pound weight loss (14.0%) within approximately 30 days and met criteria for severe malnutrition for #2. This failure also resulted in delayed implementation and evaluation of nutritional interventions after resident #7 experienced progressive, clinically significant weight loss, which was severe, and subsequently met criteria for severe malnutrition; and the failure delayed evaluation and modification of nutritional interventions after resident #5 experienced an approximately 11% unplanned severe weight loss within 35 days despite multiple identified nutritional risk factors and meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager or a full-time dietician to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals and nutritional services from the facility. The deficient practice increased the risk for food quality/safety concerns; resulted in inadequate oversight of food service operations; increased the potential for weight loss; resulted in residents eating less and feeling hungry (see F804.) Findings include:A request for the Dietary Managers Certification was submitted to the facility on 3/10/26 at 8:08 a.m. The facility was unable to provide appropriate certification for staff member M. The facility provided a copy of a ServSafe Certification dated 12/7/23 for staff member M.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 10:28 a.m., staff member M stated she did not have a current Certified Dietary Manager Certification. Staff member M stated she was currently enrolled in the training. Staff member M stated she was enrolled after the request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food (including appetizing food visually, taste wise, and with preferences) for 10 (#s 2, 8, 26, 27, 36, 50, 73, 74, 79 and 101) of 38 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in residents eating less, feeling hungry, a potential in weight loss, and resident #74 requesting to be discharged . Findings include:During an interview on 3/9/26 at 2:40 p.m., resident #36 stated the food is passable, but was sometimes cold by the time it was delivered to her in her room.During an interview on 3/9/26 at 2:47 p.m., resident #26 stated the food sucks. He stated the food had no good flavor, They don't cook it right, and they're not good cooks.During an interview with resident #2 and #79 on 3/9/26 at 3:12 p.m., resident #2 stated the food was terrible, and It's so bad. He stated many times he was unable to identify the food on his plate. He stated the food was unappetizing visually, but also after eating it as well. He stated one time he was served a burger with just the bun, no condiments or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe, sanitary manner; failed to maintain cooler temperatures within a safe range; and failed to maintain cleanliness of the kitchen and food preparation/storage areas. The deficient practices caused increased risk for foodborne illness for all residents receiving food from the dietary department. Findings include:During an observation on 3/9/26 at 1:19 p.m., the following concerns were observed:- Ground [NAME] with an expiration date of 3/21/25- Ground Sage with an expiration date of 8/17/24- A box of foam containers was sitting directly on the floor- Two paper towels were noted on the floor beside a garbage can to the right of the handwashing station in the kitchen. The garbage can was full and overflowing- Stovetop burners had a thick black buildup on them- A slice of white bread was observed on the kitchen floor- Crumbs, particles of food, dirt and grease were observed on the shelves and boxes where pan liners and foil were stored- Food and garbage was observed on the floor in the walk-in-freezerDuring an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, by not maintaining clean resident rooms and resident bathrooms, for 6 (#s 3, 7, 24, 35, 57, and 80) of 41 sampled residents; and failed to keep the community bathing/shower room on the A and B hall clean. Findings include:During an interview on 3/9/26 at 3:42 p.m., NF2 stated the resident rooms, resident bathrooms, and the community bath/shower rooms had been dirty.During an observation on 3/10/26 at 8:07 a.m., the bathroom floor in resident room B10 had dried, light black spots on various places on the floor.During an observation on 3/10/26 at 8:08 a.m., the bathroom floor in resident room B7 had a dried, light brownish/black stain covering over half of the one-foot square tile under the toilet and when wiped with a wet, white paper towel, the paper towel became stained with a brownish/yellow stain with black specks and hair.During an observation on 3/10/26 at 8:12 a.m., the community bath/shower room for the A and B halls contained two showers and was noted to have a light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have the required enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) signage posted for residents who required EBP for cares for 2 (#s 15 and 82); failed to ensure staff adhered to EBP protocols for personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing catheter care for a Suprapubic catheter for 1 (#15); failed to ensure proper perineal care was completed, clean technique used, and enhanced barrier precautions were followed when emptying a foley catheter bag for 1 (#2); and failed to ensure hand sanitizer was available to prevent the spread of infection for 4 (#s 54, 71, 73, and 74) of 38 sampled residents. These deficient practices increased the risk of facility acquired UTI's, and the transmission of microorganisms from resident to resident. Findings include: 1. No EBP Signage a. During an observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 9:35 a.m., on the outside of the door for resident #82's room was a hanging PPE caddy. There was no signage on the door to show what type of precautions were to be taken. Staff member I stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a POA's (Power of Attorney) wishes with regard to treatment for 1 (#84) of 41 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the POA not being informed of resident #84's condition or treatment, the resident continuing to receive a psychotropic medication without the POA's knowledge for approximately six months, and the resident receiving the psychotropic medication for approximately two months after the POA requested it to be stopped. Findings include: During an interview on 3/9/26 at 4:02 p.m., NF1 stated that the facility had not contacted her for a care conference for resident #84, since the last care conference in August 2025, and she had not heard from the facility since then. NF1 stated during the care conference, in August 2025, the facility had informed her that due to resident #84's depression, Ativan had been prescribed and was being administered to resident #84 since February 2025. NF1 further stated that she never gave consent for the Ativan and she informed them during the August care conference,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult and receive a representative's permission to order and administer a psychotropic medication for a resident on the memory care unit, for 1 (#84) of 41 residents. This deficient practice resulted in the resident representative not being informed in advance or being allowed to make treatment decisions for the resident's care. Findings include:A review of resident #84's Clinical Resident Profile in the facility's EHR showed [NF1] was the Responsible Party, POA, Care Conference Person, Emergency Contact #1, . Responsible Care. [sic]During an interview on 3/9/26 at 4:02 p.m., NF1 stated she found out the facility was administering Ativan to [Resident #84] for six months, without her consent.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 9:17 a.m., staff member E stated NF1 had not been informed that [Resident #84] was receiving Ativan. Staff member E further stated that NF1 was on the phone during the care conference for [Resident #84] in August 2025 and hung up when she was told [Resident #84] was prescribed Ativan without her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 65 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to schedule timely care conferences with the POA (Power of Attorney) for a resident who resides on the memory care unit, for 1 (#84) of 41 sampled residents. Findings include:During an interview on 3/9/26 at 4:02 p.m., NF1 stated she had not been notified or involved in a care conference for [Resident #84] since August 2025.During an interview on 3/10/26 at 2:22 p.m., staff member E stated she scheduled care conferences within 48 hours of admission and then annually. Staff member E further stated there was no documentation of invitations to care conferences for NF1.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 9:05 a.m., staff member E stated she was unaware that care conferences for residents was supposed to be conducted quarterly and had only been having them annually. Staff member E stated she was unaware she was supposed to invite the POA to the care conference. Staff member E further stated she did not know a care conference should have been held if a resident had a change of condition.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 10:45 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit an initial incident report for an allegation of neglect to the State Survey Agency, for 1 (#11) of 38 sampled residents. The resident did not receive the necessary care and services related to a nephrostomy tube and the tube being dislodged during care, which was later identified to be an accident. Findings include:Review of resident #11's progress note, created on 2/23/26 at 4:46 p.m., showed: Secure Message:[DATE] . The tube is out 5 inches from the stitches; no urine output. resident stated tube was pulled out by a CNA on Wed or Thur. and stopped draining urine today. [sic]During an interview on 3/11/26 at 3:09 p.m., staff member C stated he was aware of the allegation that a CNA had caused resident #11's nephrostomy tube to become dislodged. Staff member C stated he did not report this to staff member A. Staff member C stated it should have been reported to staff member A. Staff member C stated that's not my job.During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and investigate an allegation of potential neglect of care for 1 (#11) of 38 sampled residents. The allegation was later found to be an accident, but the reporting timeline was not met for an allegation of neglect, and the investigation was not immediately initiated for neglect of care, in an attempt to rule out neglect of care. Findings include:A review of resident #11's progress note, created on 2/23/26 at 4:46 p.m., showed: Secure Message:[DATE]Rachael Garrey. The tube is out 5 inches from the stitches; no urine output. resident stated tube was pulled out by a CNA on Wed or Thur. and stopped draining urine today. [sic]During an interview on 3/11/26 at 3:15 p.m., Staff member A stated the facility had not investigated the allegation to rule out neglect because the IDT did not feel that it was a reportable incident.A review of resident #11's progress note, with an effective date of 3/11/26 at 3:29 p.m., showed: NHA spoke with resident on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safe interventions for swallowing medications and food for 1 (#73) of 38 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #73 feeling rushed when taking his medications, coughing on the medications, and potentially vomiting. Findings include:During an interview and observation on 3/10/26 at 9:36 a.m., resident #73 stated only the physical therapist helped him sit up in the day to eat, but they would not visit him until early afternoon. He stated he had already eaten breakfast. Resident #73 was lying flat on his back with his head kinked forward. He stated he would often choke or throw up from taking the medications if a nurse rushed him, but had no problem swallowing food. He stated he swallowed the medications better at home because he had been sitting up in a chair before taking the pills.During an interview and observation on 3/10/26 at 9:51 a.m., resident #73 was about to be given his morning medications, and he asked staff member X, Can you adjust my head, so I don't choke?…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to independently carry out activities of daily living (ADL) for self-grooming and showering was provided a regular shower and the removal of female facial hair for 1 (#6) of 4 sampled residents for ADL services. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 3:49 p.m., resident #6 was lying in her bed on her back, with a sheet covering her lower body. She had numerous sporadic gray chin and neck hairs, which were approximately 1 to 1.5 inches long. When asked if the resident preferred to have her facial hair removed, the resident nodded her head yes, as she stated, Yes. When asked if she needed help with shaving her face, the resident nodded and said, Yes, please. The resident had a moderate amount of dried white scaly and moist yellow eye rheum in both eyes. She had a slight musty odor emanating from her person. During an observation on 3/10/26 at 11:20 a.m., resident #6 was sitting in the common day room across from the E-Hall nurses' station. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services (including preferences, goals, and standards of care) to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (#74) of 38 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #74 feeling uncared for, crying about the food (or lack of) served to her, NF5 upset about the care provided to resident #74, and resident #74 requesting to be discharged from the facility. Findings include:During an interview on 3/9/26 at 4:02 p.m., resident #74 stated the facility could improve the food as it was . terrible. Resident #74 stated she could never eat the eggs at the facility. She stated the eggs were served as two big scoops of ice cream and had no taste. She stated she was served a pork chop that she had to eat with her fingers, and was once served a plate full of cooked carrots and no other items on the tray other than soup. Resident #74 stated she was often hungry at the facility, and she was not served enough calorie-dense or filling foods. She stated she did not like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders and failed to ensure a portable oxygen tank was replaced when the metered volume was empty for 1 (#6) of 4 residents sampled for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice increased the risk of negative outcomes related to hypercapnia (a condition characterized by abnormally high levels of carbon dioxide in the blood, typically caused by hypoventilation, chronic lung diseases, like COPD, or breathing issues resulting in confusion, fatigue, and shortness of breath). Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/9/26 at 3:49 p.m., resident #6 was laying on her back turned slightly on her right side. The head of the bed was in the lowest position and was not elevated. There was an oxygen concentrator next to her bed. The oxygen concentrator was turned off, and there was no oxygen tubing attached to the oxygen concentrator. Resident #6 was not wearing any oxygen while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the competencies and skills to provide care for 1 (#11) of 38 sampled residents. The deficient practice caused the resident concerns for safety and had potential to cause the resident infection, harm, pain and unmet care needs. Findings include:During an interview on 3/11/26 at 11:10 a.m., resident #11 stated staff had at times pulled on his nephrostomy tubes during care. Resident #11 stated that staff needed training on the care of nephrostomy tubes and that one of his nephrostomy tubes had been dislodged as a result.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 11:21 a.m., staff member J and staff member P stated they had not received training on the care of a resident with nephrostomy tubes. Staff member P stated they were shown how to empty urine and to notify the nurse if it wasn't draining.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 11:25 a.m., staff member Q stated she had not received training from the facility on how to care for a resident with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an updated written agreement with a hospice, which was signed by an authorized representative of both the hospice and the facility, before hospice care was furnished at the facility to ensure coordination and communication of care was provided as ordered for 2 (#s 29 and 65) of 3 residents sampled for hospice services. This deficient practice increased the risk to any resident receiving hospice services. Findings include:Review of the facility's hospice agreements provided during the Entrance Conference, showed an agreement signed and dated on 6/24/00, for Coordination of Services Agreement Between [NF7] and [NF8]. (Neither company exists any longer).During an interview on 3/11/26 at 8:15 a.m., staff member A stated the hospice agreement provided was representative of the agreement the facility had between NF6 Hospice and the facility. Staff member A stated they currently did not have an updated hospice agreement. Staff member A stated it was the expectation for the facility to have an updated and current hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the lack of housekeeping services and concerns with missing laundry, which had been complained about in the resident council for several months, but the issues were ongoing. This failure affected any resident who did not have their concerns addressed or whose room/area they were in was not maintained by housekeeping. Findings include: Review of Resident Council minutes from September 2025 to December 2025 showed:-September - requests/concerns for laundry and housekeeping, and the residents requested deeper cleaning in their rooms, especially the toilets, and the dining room. -October - request/concerns for laundry and housekeeping, to include continuing to want deeper cleaning in the resident rooms, with a focus on fixtures and toilets, and missing laundry items, which were gone for up to a month or more. -November - requests/concerns for laundry/housekeeping were that laundry items continue to go missing for long periods of time, and residents again requested deeper cleaning pf their rooms.-December -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for the residents and failed to ensure the laundry for the residents was managed and returned to them in a timely manner; including not providing the labeled clothing to the correct resident(s), which resulted in an altercation between 2 (#s 1 and 2) of 24 sampled residents. Findings include:Laundry:During an observation and interview on 12/16/25 at 12:20 p.m., staff member R stated the resident's personal laundry was put in bins for the respective units. The laundry department had tried different ways to limit laundry issues, including using mesh labeled bags, but the bags were not consistently used by nursing to ensure the correct laundry made it back to the resident(s). Staff member R was observed putting labels on several items for the residents, and stated when they knew whose clothes they were, they would label them (with the resident's name), but a lot of the clothes came in unlabeled. Then the laundry staff would not know who the clothes belonged to. Staff member R stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations and findings of abuse timely to the State Survey Agency, for 3 (#s 10, 11, and 21) of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #21: Review of a facility reported incident, dated 6/7/25, showed an alleged incident of physical abuse occurred between staff members NF6 and NF7, and resident #21, on 6/6/25 at 2:25 a.m. The event was an abuse allegation, but not reported to the State Survey Agency within the required two-hour time frame, and the final findings for the reported incident were not submitted within the required five working days. During an interview on 12/17/25 at 3:33 p.m., staff member A stated there were technical issues with the abuse reporting system that caused the initial reporting delay for the incident that occurred on 6/6/25, with resident #21. Residents #10 and 11: During an interview on 12/17/25 at 4:32 p.m., staff member A stated facility staff were to report abuse to him immediately, but tried to have the report received no later than two hours after it occurred. Staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan contained dementia-related interventions, other than nonspecific redirection strategies, for a resident who displayed aggressive behaviors, wandering, had frequent falls, pain, and was an elopement risk, for 1 (#15); and the lack of activities affected 2 others (#s 19 and 20) of 24 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the staff lacking clear guidance on how to effectively meet a resident's needs, placing the resident at risk for inconsistent and unsafe care and unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include:During an interview on 12/15/25 at 3:26 p.m., NF3 stated, I told them she liked crossword puzzles and reading books, but I never saw anyone do activities with her, or anyone that lives there (in the locked memory care unit) for that matter.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 11:31 a.m., staff member C stated he was involved regularly with the interdisciplinary team meetings and risk management meetings. Staff member C stated, I knew of resident #15's aggressions towards other residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of daily, individualized or group activities, and meaningful engagement consistent with the cognitive needs and interests of residents with dementia residing on the secure memory care unit. to include for 3 (#s 15, 19, and 20) residents, for those sampled on the secure unit. Findings include:During an observation on 12/15/25 at 2:33 p.m., several residents were sitting in the common room of the secured memory care unit. The common room was noted to be quiet, and no music, movies, or television shows were playing on the TV. There were no interactive, engaging activities or conversations occurring with any of the residents.During an interview on 12/15/25 at 3:26 p.m., NF3 stated, I never saw any activities going on with my mom or anyone when I would go to visit on the weekends.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 10:52 a.m., staff member H stated she worked on the secured memory care unit frequently and said there were no consistent activities for the residents, then stated, Sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately identify wandering behaviors on the MDS Resident Assessments for 1 (#15) of 24 sampled residents. This failure limited the facility's ability to implement appropriate care planned interventions to prevent foreseeable harm to a resident with dementia and a known behavior of wandering daily. Findings include:During an interview on 12/16/25 at 11:51 a.m., staff member C stated he was not aware resident #15 had a history of wandering before being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Staff member C stated he assumed the questions on the admission MDS Resident Assessment Instrument pertained to only current behaviors in the facility, not behaviors before admission. Staff member C stated he did not review resident #15's medical diagnoses when filling out the admission MDS Resident Assessment. He did review all the progress notes in resident #15's electronic medical record. Staff member C stated he was aware of the importance of an accurate MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were answered timely for 6 (#s 10, 12, 26, 29, 30, 32) of 40 sampled and supplemental residents, leading residents to feel their pain was not adequately managed. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:17 p.m., resident #30 stated he often waited over 30 minutes for his call light to be answered. He stated he waited the longest for his call light to be answered at night, and he felt the facility and staff were understaffed and overworked. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:29 p.m., resident #32 stated he felt the facility was understaffed as he frequently waited 30 minutes for his call light to be answered. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:33 p.m., resident #10 stated he often waited over 30 minutes 15 times in a week for his call light to be answered. Resident #10 also stated the longest call light wait time was over an hour. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 3:56 p.m., resident #12 stated the facility only had two CNAs at night. She stated, I'm sick and tired of them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were accurate and followed; failed to ensure documentation and notification of Covid tracing in residents was completed; and failed to have a system in place to prevent and monitor water borne illnesses. These infection control failures could affect any resident at the facility, to include 8 (#s 1, 6, 10, 20, 27, 31, 32, and 280) of 40 sampled and supplemental residents; and the failure to have a waterborne pathogen program in place which could affect any resident residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 8:51 a.m. staff member K was observed in resident #280's room. The sign on the door showed the resident was under contact precautions, and staff were required to wear gown and gloves. The resident was also on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for direct care activities. Staff member K was not wearing any personal protective equipment in the room. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 9:39 a.m., staff members K and C were in resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a clean environment in resident showers; and failed to exercise reasonable care of resident clothing and other personal resident items from loss or theft, and failed to utilize a grievance process to address lost/missing items, for 4 (#s 5, 33, 67 and 69) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:55 a.m., staff member P stated the facility shower rooms needed a deep clean. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 1:11 p.m., the shower room outside of the memory care unit had a sign on the door showing, Lost/missing clothes kept in A & E shower room. Inside the shower room, in the shower stall, was a used wet washcloth on the floor and pooled dirt near the drain. In the second room was a rack full of clothes, and a tabletop overflowing with clothing. There was a sign posted to remind staff to clean and disinfect the shower stall between residents for infection control reasons. During an observation on 1/16/25 at 10:27 a.m., the shower room outside of the memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review ,the facility failed to maintain an affective grievance program to address resident concerns, specifically related to ongoing problems with lost resident belongings. This deficient practice increased the risk of a negative outcome for all residents who had concerns with grievances or lost items not elevated to a grievance level by management. Findings include: Review of a Grievance Report Form, dated 3/1/24, showed: Why do we fill out grievances? Nothing changes. Review of Grievance Report Form, dated 3/1/24, showed: Grievances not being addressed. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 3:56 p.m., staff member C said he was the grievance officer and stated the administrator and director of nursing determine what gets elevated to a grievance as it related to missing items. During an interview on 1/15/24 @ 4:21 p.m., Staff member A said social services handles the grievances, and the prior social worker was not very strong in her skillset. Staff member A said the grievance log for August 2024 was missing. During an interview on 1/15/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staff supervision on the memory care unit for 3 (#s 22, 45, and 62); failed to identify, implement, and provide sufficient interventions for a resident who eloped, for 1 (#276) ; and failed to ensure 2 (#s 2 and 28) were properly positioned when eating food for 40 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 3:00 p.m., staff members G and H stated the unit currently had a lot of residents with behaviors. They stated there were three staff scheduled for the mornings and two in the afternoons. Staff members G and H stated it was not enough staff with so many ressidents with behaviors and explained that there always needs to be one person supervising in the day room, so if a resident needed assistance in their room, staff would be spread pretty thin. During an observation on 1/14/25 at 10:00 a.m., resident #45 was standing in resident #62's doorway. Resident #62 was very agitated and wheeling towards resident #45, making verbal threats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was routinely assessed and treated according to professional standards for 3 (#s 10, 29, and 30), especially concerning pain management for a resident with advanced dementia for 1 (#14); and failed to failed to properly follow physician orders regarding pain monitoring documentation for 1 (#10) of 25 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 1/13/25 at 3:24 p.m., resident #14 was sitting at the table in the memory care unit main area. She had a distressed look on her face and was rocking in the chair. Staff member G stated resident #14 was restless and cried a lot. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:04 a.m., staff member C stated there were usually med aides staffed on the memory care unit, which required the nurse to run around the building doing treatments and prn medication assessments. During an observation on 1/16/25 at 8:30 a.m., resident #14 was sitting at the table with a full plate of food in front of her. She wasn't eating, but was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on referrals for dental care for 5 (#s 3, 5, 6, 48, 280) of 40 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #5's nursing progress notes, dated 4/15/24, showed the resident had been seen by the dental hygienist, and the concerns identified included: - Possible decay of 5, 6, 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. - Broken teeth 21 and 22. - Root tips present 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 14, 20, 30, 31. Review of resident #5's EHR, accessed on 1/13/25, showed there was a physician's order for a dental referral dated 4/15/24. Review of the resident's EHR failed to show any progress notes or followup referrals or treatment for the resident's identified dental concerns. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 8:33 a.m., staff member B stated the facility had the referral in May (2024), but did not follow up, and they would make the appointment today (1/15/25). 2. a. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:37 p.m., resident #48 stated some of the foods (like chicken) were tough to eat, and she had a hard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility dietary department and staff failed to serve food timely, and follow the posted meal times, and food was often served late which resulted in cold food, for 5 (#s 6, 10, 28, 35, and 41) of 40 sampled and supplemental residents; and 3 (#s 29, 48, 49) of 25 sampled and supplemental residents stated they disliked the food. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility document, titled Mealtimes, showed, .Dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:00 (a.m.) Breakfast . During an observation on 1/14/25 at 8:28 a.m., breakfast was being served in the dining room. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 8:31 a.m., resident #6 stated the food was typically served 30 minutes late, but could be served up to an hour late. Resident #6 stated yesterday breakfast was 30 minutes late in the dining room. Review of a facility document, titled Mealtimes, showed, .E and D Wing 8:30 (a.m.) Breakfast . During an interview on 1/15/25 at 8:07 a.m., resident #41 stated her food was served later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer resident #62 for a PASARR Level II when the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was added for 1 (#62) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #62's PASARR Level I, dated 6/21/24 lacked the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of resident #62's history and physical, dated 6/16/24 showed, .Social History .He does state he was in the special forces in the Korean war and Vietnam war, and at one point was a prisoner of war for 60 days, but escaped . [sic] Review of resident #62's MDS, with an ARD of 6/27/24, section I6100 showed the resident did not have a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of resident #62's MDS, with an ARD of 9/22/24, section I6100 showed the resident did have a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. During an interview on 1/16/25 at 8:45 a.m., staff member C stated when the diagnosis of PTSD was added to the resident's diagnoses, a new PASRR Level 1 should have been completed. The Level 1 would then show if a Level II was necessary. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include on a resident's baseline care plan that the resident received enteral tube feedings, for 1 (#281) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of the resident not receiving proper tube feedings, or receiving food items, and the resident was NPO. Findings include: A review of a facility document, titled Respite Resident . [Resident #281], showed: Daily routine and how to care for patient while he's ready, This report is from his wife. Hx of spinal cord injury, parkinson's (communication is minimal), aspiration pneumonia, . - Nothing by patients mouth d/t aspiration pneumonia. [sic] A review of resident #281's diagnoses in the facility's EHR showed: Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase . Pneumonitis Due to Inhalation of Food and Vomit . A review of resident #281's provider orders in the facility's EHR, showed: Tube feeding instructions: Isosource 1.5 @ 70 ml/hr. Continuous, With 50 ml/hr free water flush. Every shift for Continuous G tube feedings. [sic] A review of resident #281's baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the required assistance at meals, for 1 (#5); and failed to ensure a resident received assistance with toileting and dressing for 1 (#58) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 1/14/25 at 7:57 a.m., staff member G stated they were the only staff member available to pass medications and food trays. Staff member G stated they would have to stop med pass if there was a resident who required assistance with eating. Resident #5 was sitting at a table attempting to feed himself. During an observation on 1/14/25 at 8:30 a.m., resident #5 was still eating breakfast, only now with staff assistance. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 8:21 a.m., resident #5 was attempting to eat a yogurt. He was bringing the empty spoon from the yogurt container to his mouth. He was not receiving any staff assistance or cueing. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 12:20 p.m., resident #5 was trying to use the handle of a spoon as a straw to consume fluids at lunch.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure hospice referrals were completed timely for 2 (#s 14 and 29) of 3 residents sampled for hospice concerns. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #14's nursing progress notes, dated 12/15/24, showed an order was received for a hospice referral, dated 12/10/24, due to weight loss and senile degeneration of the brain. This was also shown on the resident's physician orders, dated 12/10/24. Review of resident #14's IDT progress notes, dated 12/16/24, showed the resident had a significant fall and was sent to the ER. Preventative measures listed for further fall prevention showed, She will be transitioning to hospice. Review of resident #14's nursing progress notes, dated 12/29/24, show a hospice referral order was signed by the provider and placed on 12/21/24. This was eleven days after the first hospice order was completed. Review of resident #14's nursing progress notes, dated 1/12/25, showed the residents POA wanted to start hospice for the resident. This progress note was one month after the initial order. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder, for 1 (#62) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:14 p.m., resident #62 stated he was a Veteran; and, I saw a lot of combat in Korea and Vietnam. I have PTSD. Review of resident #62's history and physical, dated 6/16/24 showed, .Social History . He does state that he was in the special forces in the Korean War in Vietnam war and at one point was a prisoner of war for 60 days but escaped[sic] During an interview on 1/15/25 at 8:14 a.m., resident #62 stated, I need to see a psychiatrist or a counselor for my PTSD. Review of resident #62's list of diagnoses list showed the resident had a medical diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. During an interview on 1/16/25 at 8:45 a.m., staff member C stated resident #62 had not been referred for treatment related to the post traumatic stress disorder. A request was made for documentation showing a referral was made for the treatment of resident #62's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility nursing staff failed to administer two medications during the evening medication administration time, that were ordered to be given two times a day for 1 (#76) of 25 sampled residents. This resulted in a 6.4 percent medication error rate. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the resident who was taking an antibiotic two times a day for pneumonia, and Potassium Chloride two times a day for encephalopathy. Findings include: A review of resident #76's EHR showed a physician's order for the antibiotic, Cefdinir, 300 mg., with an order date of 9/6/2024 at 12:40 p.m., which showed, Give 1 capsule by mouth two time a day related to Pneumonia . A review of a medication order in resident #76's EHR showed an order for Potassium Chloride, 10 meq. with, an order date of 9/6/2024 at 3:27 p.m., which was, Give 2 capsule by mouth two times a day related to Encephalopathy . [sic] A review of resident #76's MAR showed the medications, Cefdinir and Potassium Chloride, was not documented as given for the 9/6/24 medication pass at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to follow the posted menu for two meals of the three observed meals, which could affect any resident wishing to utilize the posted menu's. Findings include: During three observations on 1/14/25 at 8:33 a.m., 8:37 a.m., and 8:41 a.m., whole grain toast was not observed on a resident's plate. Review of the 1/14/25 breakfast menu showed: . Whole grain toast During an observation on 1/15/25 at 12:37 p.m., the following foods were served for lunch: - Potato soup - Ham and cheese on a croissant - Watermelon - Cupcake Review of the 1/15/25 Lunch Menu showed: Garden vegetable soup Classic beef stroganoff Lemon buttered broccoli Baked roll Raspberry jello salad The menu items posed were not what was served that day.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered therapeutic diet was followed for 3 (#s 12, 48, 280) of 40 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: a. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 3:56 p.m., resident #12 stated, (It was) unfortunate that the kitchen is not required to do a better job for diabetics. Resident #12 stated her blood sugar was commonly very high since being admitted to the facility, and she would often bring her own food. Resident #12 stated lunch that day was chili, coleslaw, spiced apples, yogurt (not low sugar), and carrot cake. Resident #12 stated this was too many carbohydrates for her to eat as a diabetic. Review of resident #12's EHR showed: CCHO diet. b. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 4:37 p.m., resident #48 stated she had to remind the staff to give her sugar free syrup because she stated they would forget and serve her regular syrup with breakfast, such as with waffles. Review of resident #48's EHR showed: CCHO diet. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 9:26 a.m., staff member F stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for 13 (#s 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17) of 13 sampled residents. This deficiency had the potential to affect the resident's safety from sexual abuse. Findings include: During an interview on 10/29/24 at 12:44 p.m., staff member A said he completed the audits for residents #s 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Staff member A said he did not know why his audits showed these residents did not have a Sexual Activity Capacity for Consent assessment on 9/24/24 but all of those residents did have a Sexual Activity Capacity assessment completed on 9/19/24. He stated he just trusted the social services director, and she must have given him false information. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 2:00 p.m., staff member A saw a white binder with completed Sexual Activity Capacity for Consent assessments dated 9/19/24 in the surveyor's possession. He stated, where did you get those, you should not have been given that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and report an incident of suspected medical neglect of care by a staff member, for 1 (#1); and failed to identify and report an incident of inappropriate sexual contact, involving 2 (#s 5 and 7) to the State Survey Agency, of 11 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During a telephone interview on 8/27/24 at 1:59 p.m., staff member H said she accidentally gave resident #1 the wrong medications on 7/27/24. She said she gave resident #1 a 10 mg Vicodin and 60 mg of OxyContin by mistake. She said she called the provider right away. She did not put the resident on a continuous oxygen saturation monitor and did not take vital signs immediately. She said the provider told her to take vital signs every four hours. She said about three hours later, the resident was found unresponsive. She said she gave resident #1 Narcan and called 911. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 11:14 a.m., staff member C said he was the administrator for the facility when the medication error occurred on 7/27/24. He stated, We do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate an incident involving a significant medication error when medical neglect occurred after the error, for 1 (#1) resident; failed to fully investigate an incident involving sexual contact between 2 (#s 5 and 7) residents who were not assessed to ensure it was consensual contact, and ensure other residents were protected, which allowed ongoing sexual behaviors to go unaddressed as needed. This negatively affected a resident (#6), who would then not leave her room or go to the dining room due the male's approaches and comments to her, of 4 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During a telephone interview on 8/27/24 at 2:37 p.m., staff member H said she was administering medications on 7/27/24, and she accidentally gave resident #1 a 10 mg Vicodin and 60 mg OxyContin, neither were ordered for her. Resident #1 was later found later unconscious and hypoxic. Staff member H said she gave resident #1 Narcan to reverse the effects of the opioid medications and called 911. Staff member H said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide clean resident rooms for 12 (#s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 8:30 a.m., resident #1's room had dried spaghetti and unidentifiable food chunks next to the bed and scattered around the room. A used, disposable tooth flosser was on the floor between dressers. Under the bed, were multiple items with dust bunnies and dried food particles. Several areas on the floor had dirt covered, sticky substance spots. The bathroom in resident #1's room had dried urine on the toilet seat. During an observation and interview on 6/4/24 at 8:35 a.m., resident #2 stated she was unsure of the timing of how often she saw housekeeping in her room. Resident #3 stated housekeeping was in their room maybe once a week. Resident #2's and #3's toilet had dried feces on the toilet seat and scattered, dried food on the floor of the room. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a structured activities program, to meet each residents' individual preferences and needs in the secured, memory care unit. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the secured care unit. Findings include: During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:17 a.m., resident #5 (who resided on the general care unit) stated residents from the memory care unit did not participate in activities outside of their unit. She stated she participated often in activities, and had not witnessed anyone from the memory care unit in activities. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 11:22 a.m., staff member B stated the CNA's in the memory care unit did activities with the residents. She stated the CNA's did coloring, puzzles, adult bowling, balloon toss, and television programming with the residents. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 11:47 a.m., staff member H stated staff member F did not do activities with residents in the memory care unit. Staff member H stated staff member F occasionally brought coloring pages…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff member M failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality by not priming an insulin pen prior to the administration of insulin for 1 (#6) of 14 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 9:57 a.m., staff member M entered resident #6's and performed a blood glucose monitoring test. Resident #6's blood glucose reading was 163. During an observation on 6/4/24 at 10:04 a.m., staff member M had retrieved two new insulin pens for resident #6, from a medication room. Staff member M labeled each insulin pen with an opening date. Staff member M dialed the Tresiba FlexTouch insulin pen to 40 units, then set the pen on top of the medication cart. Staff member M then dialed the Novolog insulin pen to 2 units. Staff member M did not prime either the Tresiba or the Novolog insulin pen with 2 units of insulin to clear any air from the pens. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 10:10 a.m., staff member M stated she had never heard of priming an insulin pen and did not know anything about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a dependent resident for 1 (#9) of 14 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused the resident to feel unsafe, dirty, and embarrassed. Findings include: During an interview on 6/4/24 at 8:11 a.m., staff member H stated the scheduling of staff on the units was usually consistent for the residents, so staff were familiar with their care needs. She stated not all residents knew to use their call lights, so staff needed to check in with the residents to see if they needed help, such as repositioning or transfers. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:24 a.m., staff member E stated the staff repositioned residents who needed assistance with their positioning usually every two hours, or as needed. The staff also helped with transfers when residents used their call lights. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 1:26 p.m., NF1 stated resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation to increase his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff member M failed to perform proper hand hygiene when entering/exiting a resident's room, during blood glucose monitoring, during insulin administration, and during administration of eye drops for 1 (#6) of 14 sampled residents; failed to utilize a protective barrier during blood glucose monitoring; and failed to clean a glucose monitoring device (glucometer) after use. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of bloodborne pathogens spread to other residents using the same glucometer. Findings include: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 9:54 a.m., staff member M entered resident #6's room to administer medications and perform blood glucose monitoring. Staff member M did not sanitize her hands upon entering resident #6's room. Staff member M placed the glucometer and supplies onto resident #6's over the bed table, which also had the breakfast food tray on the table. Staff member M did not place a protective barrier underneath the glucometer and supplies. Staff member M administered resident #6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the floors and rooms were clean for 10 (#s 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 15) of 14 sampled residents for a clean environment. This deficient practice caused resident #3 to feel discouraged and frustrated. Findings include: During an interview on 4/8/24 at 10:50 a.m., resident #10 stated CNAs left soiled diapers in residents rooms, and the floors were dirty most of the time. During an observation on 4/8/24 at 10:55 a.m., resident #s 2 and 7 had 3 food wrappers on their floor, with 2 of the wrappers under resident #7's bed. During an observation on 4/8/24 at 11:00 a.m., resident #4's floor had dirt-like looking clumps by the bathroom. During an observation on 4/8/24 at 11:10 a.m., the hallway outside of resident #9's room contained four, medium sized spots of dried coffee spills. During an interview on 4/8/24 at 1:57 p.m., staff members G and I stated housekeeping was short staffed, and floor cleaning often did not get done on the weekends or after 3:30 p.m., because there were no staff scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall interventions for 1 (#4) of 2 sampled residents for falls. Findings include: Review of resident #4's Care Plan showed the following interventions for the resident's risk for falls: - 2/5/24: Ensure that lighting is adequate, and lights are functioning, including night lights. - 2/5/24: Ensure that the clothing does not cause tripping; and that rubber soled, heeled shoes or non-skid slippers are worn. - 3/6/24: Provide a fall mat for safety as resident will often attempt getting up on her own. Due to dementia resident does not remember to use call light and/or ask for assistance. - 4/1/24: Non-slip strips to be added to floor in front of recliner. During an observation on 4/8/24 at 11:00 a.m., resident #4 was sitting on the floor at the side of her bed, yelling out for help. The floor was wet with urine and did not have non-skid stripping or a fall mat. Resident #4 did not have footwear on, her sheets were soaked with urine, and the light was dim. During an interview on 4/8/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for 1 (#4) of 2 sampled residents for falls. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 3/16/24, showed resident #4 had a fall resulting in an acute distal clavicle fracture. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility as she had a prior history of falls at home. Review of the facility's fall log showed resident #4 had seven falls from 2/8/24-4/8/24. Review of resident #4's Progress Notes, dated 4/1/24, showed resident #4 had a fall on 4/1/24, resulting in a 4 cm laceration to the left side of her scalp, requiring staples. During an observation on 4/8/24 at 11:00 a.m., resident #4 was sitting on the floor on the side of her bed, with her knees bent up to her chin, barefoot, quietly yelling for help. The resident was not wearing a brief or bottoms. The floor was wet with urine, and resident #4's bedsheets were soaked with urine. The room's lighting was dim. The floor did not have non-skid strips or a fall mat. During an interview on 4/8/24 at 1:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference of sleeping in a recliner instead of a bed, for 1 (#53) of 1 sampled resident, which caused concern for the resident related to her safety and comfort. Findings include: Review of an incident reported to the State Survey Agency, dated 1/2/24, showed: . Interview of staff . he stated, 'I put the resident to bed, all was fine, no episodes noted of delirium at that time.' He stated, 'no other care givers were in the room on this night.' [Employee title] is a prn employee; resident traditionally sleeps in her recliner not in her bed and this may have caused some confusion as well [sic] During an observation and interview on 1/31/24 at 9:39 a.m., resident #53 was sitting in a wheelchair conversing with a visitor, and there was a recliner in the center of the room. Resident #53 stated she always sleeps in a recliner, and said, I have a fear of falling out of the bed, and a fear I can't get out of bed. I have slept in a recliner for a long time. During an interview on 1/31/24 at 2:24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, a facility staff member neglected to communicate a resident's pain concerns to the nurse on more than one occasion, and over a 1 to 2 hour time span; and, during an interaction the staff member verbally mistreated the resident, and used a hand gesture to slap in the resident's face being mean and disrespectful, for 1 (#333) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include: A review of a Grievance Report Form, dated 1/25/24, from resident #333, showed: I asked for my pain meds about midnight last night, 12:01 a.m. The young lady that came in is [NF1]. I asked her to let the nurse know may pain med is due and I was in a lot of pain. I had major back surgery six to seven weeks earlier. She didn't respond much at all. An hour went by and I called back and asked again. She came back and acted as if I was just bothering her. She slapped her hand in my face, as to tell me to just sit there and shut up! When all I did was to remind her I asked her an hour ago for pain med. after two hours went by. I call her again. She showed me no respect at all and asked me…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility nursing staff failed to follow a provider order for donning and doffing anti-embolism stockings, 1 (#53) of 1 sampled resident, Findings include: Review of an incident reported to the State Survey Agency, dated 12/28/23, showed: Resident found on floor in her room beside her bed. She was wearing compression socks at the time and these were removed. Resident also noted to be wearing compression hose at the time of the fall, proper footwear or slip grip socks to be worn over them to prevent falls is recommended. Review of resident #53's progress note, dated, 12/28/23 at 07:23 a.m., and authored by staff member D, showed, Resident had an unwitnessed fall in her room beside her bed.She was wearing compression socks at the time and these were removed. A review of a provider order for resident#53, dated 5/25/2023, showed: Order Summary TED Hose Every day and night shift for edema [NAME] in am, doff @ HS [sic] During an interview on 1/31/24 at 2:42 p.m., Staff member B stated it was the CNAs responsibility to remove resident #53's TED hose at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility dietary staff failed to ensure dry food storage was in line with identified safe food handling guidelines, and failed to have processes in place to identify and maintain a clean environment in the kitchen, as evidenced by the lack of a cleaning schedule, and unsanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 12/19/23 at 8:22 a.m., the following was found: - a 24 oz package of orange gelatin was opened- sealed with a paper clip and not dated, - a 16 oz bag of oreo cookies pieces was open and not dated, - a 16 oz bag of mini marshmallows was open and not dated, - a two pound bag of elbow macaroni was open and not dated, - a five pound bag of yellow cornmeal was open and not sealed or dated; and, - a four pound bag of cocoa powder was open and not sealed or dated. The other opened dry foods in the storage area were dated with a month and day, none of the dates included the year. A four oz individual container of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and submit complete and accurate Payroll Based Journal information for all required data for Fiscal Year 2023. Findings include: Review of the CASPER report showed a concern for low weekend staffing, licensed nurses for 24 hours per day, and a 1 star staffing rating for Quarter 4 of Fiscal Year 2023. Review of the time punches for the following dates: 7/8/23, 7/15/23, 7/22/23, 7/29/23, 8/5/23, 8/12/23, 8/13/23, 8/20/23, 8/26/23, and 9/9/23, showed there were licensed nursing staff in the facility 24 hours each day. During an interview on 12/20/23 at 9:34 a.m., staff member M stated the submissions to the PBJ were done by payroll, based on time clock punches. Staff member M stated the facility was purchased by a new company and payroll was screwed up because the time clock was not in. Staff member M stated punches were put in later so staff could be paid, but they did not correct the PBJ.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary environment in the laundry facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents requiring laundry services; and failed to ensure a residents soiled bed sheet was replaced for 1 (#227) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 11:04 a.m., the soiled laundry sorting room door was propped open between the soiled laundry sorting room and the washing machines. There was a strong smell of feces and urine coming from the washing machine area. There was the sound of water pouring and splashing coming from behind the washing machines. There was a warm breeze, that smelled of feces and urine coming from behind the washing machines. Upon inspection, behind the washing machines, there was dirty wash water pouring out from pipes on the back of the washing machines into an open concrete trough. The wall by the drain trough was splashed with dirty wash water. There were two wire coat hangers, that had been straightened,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely submission of resident MDSs for 7 (#s 16, 63, 64, 73, 223, 225, and 227) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #64's admission MDS, with an ARD of 11/7/23, showed it was not completed until 11/21/23. 2. Review of resident #63's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 11/23/23, showed it was not completed until 12/11/23. 3. Review of resident #73's admission MDS, with an ARD of 11/27/23, showed three of the areas were not completed until 12/15/23. 4. Review of resident #16's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 12/3/23, showed two of the areas were not completed until 12/18/23. 5. Review of resident #223's admission MDS, with an ARD of 12/11/23, showed the assessment was eight days overdue. 6. Review of resident #227's admission MDS, with an ARD of 12/11/2023, showed the assessment only had 6 out of 18 sections completed, and was eight days overdue. 7. Review of resident #225's admission MDS, with an ARD of 12/14/23, showed the assessment was five days overdue. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 2:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with transfers in a timely manner for 3 (#s 2, 66, and 227) of 35 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #2 feeling scared and delayed care for others. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:13 p.m., resident #66 was lying in bed. Resident #66 stated he had been in bed all day, and the staff had not helped him to his chair. Resident #66 stated the staff were to use a hoyer lift to transfer him. Resident #66 stated he had called the staff to help transfer him multiple times that day, but they had not helped him. During an observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 11:39 a.m., resident #66 was lying in bed. Resident #66 stated he had used his call light multiple times because had been trying to find out when his shower was for the past three hours, because his family was coming for lunch that day. Resident #66 stated he had not been out of bed yet that morning. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 2:18 p.m., staff member J…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enough staff to assist residents with ADL needs and tasks, and complete MDSs, resulting in long resident wait times and incompletion of assistance and tasks for 6 (#s 2, 37, 39, 66, 223, and 227), causing resident #66 to be scared; and late MDS submissions for 7 (#s 16, 63, 64, 73, 223, 225, and 227) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:13 p.m., resident #66 was lying in bed. Resident #66 stated he had been in bed all day, and the staff had not helped him to his chair. Resident #66 stated the staff were to use a Hoyer lift to transfer him. Resident #66 stated he had called the staff to help transfer him multiple times, but they did not help him. Resident #66 stated he thought the facility needed more staff because he could not get the help he needed. During an interview on 12/18/23 at 2:44 p.m., resident #227 stated the facility was, .extremely short handed. Now one girl (CNA) is doing everything because they are short at night. If you need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to honor bathing preferences for 2 (#s 39 and 40) residents, who felt it was important due to skin concerns and comfort, of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 1:23 p.m., resident #40 said she got a shower once a week, but her preference was at least two showers a week, due to her size, numerous skin folds, and her potential for skin breakdown, especially on her buttocks due to sitting all the time. Resident #40 said she had a rash on her buttocks. Review of resident #40's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 11/7/23, Section C, showed the resident was cognitively intact. Section H showed the resident was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Section K showed the resident's weight as 391 pounds. Review of resident #40's care plan, last reviewed on 9/26/23, showed the resident had a focus for her ADL self-care performance deficit related to her changing cognitive status, mood decline, her use of psychoactive medications, and physical limitations such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in a resident's increased depression for 1 (#53); and failed to notify the physician of a missed antibiotic for 1 (#53) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview and observation on 12/18/23 at 2:48 p.m., resident #53 was in her room, and was observed to be crying on interview. Review of resident #53's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 6/7/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 7, which indicated the presence of mild depression. Review of resident #53's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 8/21/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 10, which indicated the presence of moderate depression. Review of resident #53's medical records progress notes, dated 6/1/23 to 12/20/23, failed to show the resident's physician had been notified of resident #53's increased depression. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 8:21 a.m., staff member G said the team would discuss contacting the physician for medication interventions for a resident's increased depression. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, personalized care plan for 1 (#53) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:48 p.m., resident #53 was leaning forward over her walker, moaning. During the interview the resident started crying as she was talking about getting married, her three divorces, and the death of a child. Review of resident #53's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 6/7/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 7, which indicated the presence of mild depression. Section V, Care Area Assessment Summary, showed the Mood State care area had triggered and should be care planned. Review of a Mood State care area assessment (CAA) worksheet, completed in conjunction with the Annual MDS, with an ARD of 6/7/23, showed resident #53 had mild depression. The Care Plan Considerations section of the CAA worksheet showed her mood state would be addressed in her care plan, and the overall objective was for an improvement Review of resident #53's care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to revise a care plan with focus, goals, and interventions for increased depression for 1 (#53) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:48 p.m., resident #53 was in her room. The resident was leaning forward over her walker and moaning. The resident started talking about getting married, her previous three divorces, and the death of a child. The resident began to cry during the interview. The interview was stopped due to the resident crying, and she became unintelligible. Review of resident #53's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 8/21/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 10, which had increased from the previous score of 7, which reflected the presence of moderate depression, but the resident's depression had increased. Review of resident #53's care plan, dated 12/6/23, failed to show a revised focus, goals, or interventions related to resident #53's change in the severity of her depression. Review of resident #53's August through December 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards due to failure to follow ¹physician orders for 1 (#53) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of resident #53's August 2023 medication administration record (MAR) showed the resident had been prescribed the antibiotic Macrobid, 100 mg, once a day, for five days. The MAR showed doses of the antibiotic were not given on 8/13/23 or 8/14/23. Review of resident #53's nursing progress note, dated 8/14/23, showed, . Reviewed MAR and noted that resident had two doses of antibiotics for UTI [urinary tract infection] and then missed two doses. Gave today's missed dose this evening and updated schedule on MAR to give the last two doses in the evenings and end on 8/16/2023. Resident resting now and showing no signs of distress. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 8:58 a.m., staff member I said physician orders should always be followed. ¹ Nurses are obligated to follow the orders of a licensed physician or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete root cause analysis was completed post fall for 1 (#65) of 35 sampled residents. This deficient practice could negatively affect a resident and hinder efforts for fall prevention in the future, if appropriate interventions related to root causes of falls were not identified, and addressed. Findings include: During an interview on 12/21/23 at 9:52 a.m., staff member B stated staff member M was to train the management staff on completing a root cause analysis for incidents (related to falls). Staff member M stated she gave the team the root cause analysis form and showed them how to complete it. Staff member B stated she could not remember the last time she was trained on the '5 Whys' root cause analysis, and staff member M stated she could not remember the last time she trained the staff on how to perform a root cause analysis. Review of a facility document titled, 5 Why's Root Cause Analysis Tool Template, for a facility reported incident for a fall involving resident #65 on 11/18/23, in which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to identify and address behavioral health service needs for 1 (#53) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview and observation on 12/18/23 at 2:48 p.m., resident #53 was in her room. The resident was leaning forward over her walker and moaning. When asked if she was okay, resident #53 started crying, and her voice became unintelligible. Resident #53 was able to voice she was getting married, and the man was [AGE] years old. She said she had been divorced three times in the past. Resident #53 then said something about her child dying years ago, and she started crying more. At that point the interview was stopped due to the resident being inconsolable. Review of resident #53's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 6/7/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 7, which reflected the presence of mild depression. Review of resident #53's Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 8/21/23, showed the resident had a PHQ-9 score of 10, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide dental services for 1 (#64) of 35 sampled residents, resulting in a delay of treatment for the resident. Findings include: During an interview on 12/20/23 at 8:17 a.m., staff member G stated the nurses would be responsible for making referrals for dental work for the reisdents. There was a standing physician order for dental referrals for residents. Review of resident #64's care plan, dated 11/7/23, showed an intervention of, obtain order for dental consult. Review of resident #64's nutritional assessment, dated 11/11/23, showed he was missing and/or had broken teeth. Review of resident #64's electronic medical record had no documentation to show the resident was seen by a dentist or if a dental appointment or dental services had been obtained for him. Review of the facility policy titled, Dental Services, revised December 2016, showed: Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and care plan . 6. Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow 1 resident (#1) of 2 sampled residents to refuse a recommended medical treatment by having her sign a behavioral contract stating she would go to counseling services she had previously refused to attend. Findings include: During an interview on 10/11/23 at 10:03 a.m., resident #1 stated, One day 6 or 7 people from administration came into my room. They were loud and it felt intimidating with them standing all around and above me. [Staff member C] told me I had to sign a document, or I would be evicted. I signed it but I didn't agree with it. Resident #1 stated, It felt like they were retaliating against me for speaking up. I am afraid if I complain about anything anymore, they will be able to kick me out of my home. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 8:56 a.m., staff member C said, his interpretation of the letter was to establish boundaries. If the contract wasn't followed, the resident would be given a 30-day notice of discharge. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 10:42 a.m., staff member B said, resident #1 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow 1 resident (#1) of 2 sampled residents to voice grievances without fear of reprisal. Findings include: During an interview on 10/11/23 at 10:03 a.m., resident #1 stated, One day six or seven people from administration came into my room. They were loud and it felt intimidating with them standing all around and above me. [Staff member C] told me I had to sign a document, or I would be evicted. I signed it but I didn't agree with it. Resident #1 stated, It felt like they were retaliating against me for speaking up. I am afraid if I complain about anything anymore, they will be able to kick me out of my home. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 8:56 a.m., staff member C said, he read the agreement to resident #1 out loud. Staff member C said there were five members of administration in resident #1's room when he read the letter to her. Staff member C said, his interpretation of the letter was to establish boundaries. If the contract wasn't followed, the resident would be given a 30-day notice of discharge. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to anticipate the risk and protect one resident (#2) of 1 sampled resident from sexual abuse by another resident (#3) causing #2 to yell out and appear frightened, and the facility failed to protect one resident (#1) of 1 sampled resident from intimidation by staff, causing the resident emotional distress to include slapping herself in the face. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 4:00 a.m. resident #3 was in his room and appeared to be sleeping. Resident #3 was the only resident on that hall, and his room was in front of the nursing station. Review of resident #3's Telehealth Encounter, dated 10/6/23, showed, The staff may be moving him to the Memory Care Unit to better observe and provide more intense care for [Resident #3], though I think this will be of benefit for the overall care of [Resident #3] there is a degree of risk that other residents .might wander into [Resident #3]'s room or come in close proximity to him. Though [Resident #3] hasn't had any inappropriate touching over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to care for residents for 4 night shifts between 8/1/23 and 8/23/23. This deficiency caused 6 (#s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) of 7 sampled residents to have call light wait times over thirty minutes for all, and over an hour for 4 of the 6 residents; and for 2 residents (#s 6 and 9) of 7 sampled residents to feel neglected and fearful they would not get help in a timely manner. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 8/30/23 at 10:36 a.m., resident #9 stated, I do worry about if I really needed someone to come fast, I'm not sure they could. If I was having a hard time breathing or something I could be in real trouble before anyone even saw me. During an interview on 8/30/23 at 10:39 p.m., NF 1 stated, They are understaffed especially on Saturday and Sunday, even during the day but definitely at night. During an observation and interview on 8/30/23 at 10:19 a.m., resident #6 was sitting in her chair in her room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely care for 1 resident #6 of 1 sampled resident causing resident #6 to feel neglected. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 8/30/23 at 10:19 a.m., resident #6 was sitting in her chair in her room. The room appeared cluttered and smelled of old urine. Resident #6 stated there were several days when she was left in bed until noon. Resident #6 stated, I like to get up in the morning and have my coffee. I couldn't get out of bed by myself, and it would take forever for someone to come help me. By the time someone would finally come, I was drenched in urine. That is just very upsetting to me. One night a few weeks ago, I went eleven hours without getting changed when I was wet. There are many times it takes longer than 25 minutes for anyone to come help me when I push my call light. It really is neglectful and when I say something they make me feel like I am an awful person . there was a CNA that would come in and turn off my call light and leave or she would say there are seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment in good repair for the residents on the memory care unit, and for the residents who used the main dining room. Findings include: During an observation on 12/20/23 at 8:10 a.m., the wall in the community area on the memory care unit had areas of paint missing from the wall and gouges in the dry wall from the recliner chairs hitting the wall. The Formica on the windowsills had been chipped off and the press board was exposed. There was an electrical plug for a surge protector power strip hanging part of the way out of the electrical outlet. The metal prongs were exposed. There was medical tape on the plug that looked like an attempt had been made to tape the plug into the outlet. During an observation on 12/20/23 at 8:14 a.m., the faucet for the sink in the main dining room was leaking. There was brown staining in the sink near the juice dispenser. The juice dispenser had a sticky substance on the dispenser's spouts. There was reddish, yellow liquid in the metal tray on the juice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$320,155 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $205,400 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
  • $52,728 — penalty dated 2025-12-17
  • $52,716 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
  • $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CASHMER LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
FEY, KRISTINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 07/01/2023
FEY, DANIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, CAMERONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, SERENEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
MYERS, WALTERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, JAREDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
GEDLAMAN, DEREKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2025
HARDY, TAYLORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
ANDERSON, WENDYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$410K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 3%Other / private 15%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $410K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,703per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$248per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275025. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next