Fountain View Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 88.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and intervention to prevent physical abuse for one (#4) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of nine sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to protect Resident #4 from physical abuse by Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/28/26 at 1:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation the facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality.Specifically, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity and ensure call lights were answered timely.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy and procedure, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 9:17 a.m. It read in pertinent part, All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be notified.II. Resident interviewsResident #10 was interviewed on 12/10/25 at 11:25 a.m. Resident #10 said the staff sometimes took a while to respond to her call light. Resident #10 said the average response time when she activated her call light was about two hours, but sometimes the staff took up to three hours to get to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of the facility Dietary Manager job qualifications, the facility failed to have a Certified Dietary Manager and/or full time Dietitian oversight to perform the functions of the kitchen and nutrition services for all 83 residents receiving food from the kitchen. This failure increased the potential that the residents would not be provided the diets specific to their needs and basic kitchen sanitation would not be maintained. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 09/16/24 at 9:40 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that he had started working as the dietary manager about a week ago. When asked if he was certified as a dietary manager, the DM stated that he was enrolled in an online Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) course and had finished about 40 hours out of a 120 - hour course. Further interview with the DM on 09/16/24 at 9:40 AM revealed that the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) came to the facility twice a week for consultation with the DM. On 09/19/24, the facility Administrator provided the job descriptions signed by the DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary condition and failed to maintain temperature and sanitizer logs for the dish machine. This failure increased the risk of contamination of food served to all 83 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the policy, Dietary Sanitization, adopted 12/19/16, revealed, The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner . All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean . All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils . Dishwashing machines must be operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions . Low-Temperature Dishwasher (Chemical Sanitization) wash temperature 120 degrees. Final rinse with 50 parts per million (ppm) with hypochlorite (chlorine) for at least 10 seconds . Kitchen and dining room surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent an accumulation of grime. The Food Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to 1.) develop care plans with measurable goals for seven of 23 sampled residents (Resident (R) 8, 9, 14, 37, 57, 69, 286) and 2.) failed to develop care plans to address vision and hearing and/or dental status for two of 23 sampled residents (R286 and R9). This had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive and Revisions policy, adopted 12/19/16 revealed, . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: Include measurable objectives and timeframes . 1. Review of R8's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of the facility's Controlled Drugs Count Record/Date sheets, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic count was consistently completed at each shift change on four of four medication carts. Failure to properly account for the narcotics had the potential to result in missing narcotic medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Controlled Substances, adopted 12/19/16, indicated, . The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances . Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift, The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together . Review of the Controlled Drugs Count Record/Date for four of the four medication carts used by the facility revealed the following: 1.The Controlled Drugs Count Record/Date for the Weeping Willow unit medication cart was missing a nurse's signature as follows: 09/18/24: oncoming for 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve the preplanned portion sizes during the lunch service on 13 of 13 trays observed out of a total of 83 trays plated for lunch. This failure increased the potential of residents not receiving the preplanned nutritional diet. Findings include: During observation of the lunch tray line on 09/19/24 from 11:30 to 11:40 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM), the portion of carrots plated on the first 12 trays appeared to be large, taking up half of the plate. After the 12th tray, this surveyor asked the DM what the portion size for the carrots was per the menu. Without looking at the menu, the DM stated that the carrots were to be a 3-ounce serving. The DM was asked if the scoop being used by the cook was the correct size. The DM looked at the scoop and verified that the scoop was a 4-ounce scoop and not a 3-ounce scoop. The DM then removed the 4-ounce scoop and replaced it with a 3-ounce scoop. Continued observation of the lunch tray line revealed that the mechanical chopped meat was being served with the wrong scoop size. The DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge for two of two residents/representatives (Resident (R) 21 and R17) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 23 residents. This failure had the potential to cause uncertainty regarding the reason for transfer/discharge, the effective date of the transfer/discharge, and information on how to appeal the discharge. Findings include: Review of the policy Discharging/Transferring the Resident, revised 12/01/19, revealed, . For facility initiated discharges, once discharge or transfer is determined to be indicated or appropriate, the resident advocate or designee will provide the resident with a Notice of Discharge/Transfer that explains the reason for discharge, the effective date of the discharge, and information regarding how to appeal the discharge if desired . In emergency situations staff shall document the reasonable efforts that have been made to consult the resident or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the bed hold policy for two of two residents/representatives (Resident (R) 21 and R17) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 23 residents. This failure had the potential to cause uncertainty regarding returning to their own room at the facility after hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the policy Holding Bed Space, adopted 12/2017, revealed, Our facility shall inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization . of our bed-hold policy . when a resident is transferred for hospitalization . a representative of the business office or designee will provide written information concerning the facility's bed hold policy . 1. Review of R21's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/04/24. Further review of this MDS revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities other than television for one of three residents (Resident (R) 59) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) out of a total sample of 23 residents. This failure had the potential to cause feelings of boredom and further isolation from others. Findings include: Review of the policy, Activity Programs, version 12/19/16, revealed . The Activities Program is ongoing and includes . facility sponsored individual activities (including one-on-one activities) and independent individual activities . Activities are offered 7 (seven) days a week . our activity programs consist of individual . activities that are designed to meet the needs and interests of each resident . Activities are documented in the resident's medical record . Review of R59's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/08/24 that documented R59 was initially admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO