No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Billings Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

600 S 27th St, Billings, MT 59101 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (406) 259-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$62,797 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $62,797 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-06)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2702 8th Ave N · (406) 238-5200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
214 N Broadway · (406) 206-2001 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3024 2nd Ave N · (406) 259-2622 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2999 8th Ave S · (406) 657-8371 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
425 S 28th St, Billings, Mt 59101 · (406) 294-4673

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.8%18.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%5.6%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%4.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.4%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%15.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%93.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%24.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.0%20.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%73.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%19.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.0%14.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.931.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.602.161.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 5.7–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
0.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
72.5%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 77.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent Immediate Jeopardy level neglect by refusing to allow a resident re-entry to the facility after transferring to the hospital, then he went AMA, and attempted to return to the facility, which resulted in the resident sitting outside of the facility for several hours in inclement weather, and placing the resident at high risk of a serious adverse outcome, for 1 (#1) of 3 residents sampled for discharge. On 6/6/24 at 1:06 p.m., the facility Administrator and administrative staff were notified of an Immediate Jeopardy involving resident #1, pertaining to F600 - Freedom from Abuse and Neglect. The facility provided an acceptable plan to remove the immediacy for the resident involved, and the time the immediacy was removed was at 4:58 p.m. on 6/6/24. The surveyor was onsite verified the removal of immediacy by observations, interviews, and record reviews. The Severity and Scope of the Immediate Jeopardy was identified to be at the level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to protect 2 (#s 15 and 66) of 9 residents sampled for abuse and neglect; and #66 had extended fear due to conflicts with the room mate, and #15 incurred a fall due to neglect by the staff member. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 3:25 p.m., resident #66 was sitting in his room on the 400 hall. Resident #66 stated he did not get along very well with his roommate, and it had been that way for months. During an observation and interview on 9/12/23 at 8:17 a.m., resident #66 had been moved to a room on the 500 hall. Resident #66 stated, I had been having problems with my roommate. He is mean to me and verbally abusive, he pushed me to the floor the other day, and it hurt my bottom and back. I had to ask for some extra Tylenol. Resident #66 stated his roommate would block his way to his closet or sink so he could not use them. Resident #66 stated his roommate would also go through his things and take them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's change in condition of her mental status for 1 (#1) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #1 being discharged from the facility involuntarily on 5/18/26 at 9:50 p.m. for behaviors related to threatening others in the building, to an unsafe environment. Findings include:During an interview on 5/20/26 at 1:48 p.m., staff member O stated resident #1 came to her on 5/16/26 and stated, My roommate needs to be out of my room tonight or something's going to happen. Staff member O stated she did not ask any questions or what the statement meant. Staff member O stated resident #1 asked several times if the roommate would be moved and once the staff moved the roommate to another room, resident #1 repeatedly thanked her. Staff member O stated resident #1 seemed to be happy and pleasant on 5/17/26. Staff member O stated staff member U came to her on 5/18/26 at the start of her shift and reported resident #1 had made a threat to staff saying, I need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was involuntarily discharged was discharged to a safe environment; and failed to ensure the medical record included physician documentation of the dangers of the resident remaining in the facility would pose, interventions attempted, and efforts to meet resident's needs for 1 (#1) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #1 being discharged to a home with a caregiver who had expressed she was unable to care for resident #1. Findings include:During an interview on 5/20/26 at 12:42 p.m., NF2 stated she was contacted by the facility the evening of 5/18/26, and she was told resident #1 was threatening residents and the facility would be calling the police department and resident #1 could no longer stay at the facility and was being discharged . NF2 stated she told staff member C she would drive over immediately. NF2 stated the facility was already aware of resident #1's violent behaviors in the past and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement a baseline care plan for 1 (#1) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #1's needs not being addressed by staff when resident #1 had behaviors. Findings include:Review of resident #1's medical record showed the record lacked a baseline care plan. A comprehensive care plan was initiated on 5/18/26. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE].During an interview on 5/20/26 at 3:28 p.m., staff member C stated she was not aware resident #1 did not have a baseline care plan. Staff member C stated resident #1 should have a baseline care plan in place. Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plan, dated 4/4/26, showed:- The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care.- 1. The baseline care plan will: a. Be developed within 48 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure infection control processes were followed during wound care to promote healing of a pressure wound for 1 (#15) of 3 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of infection in the resident's Stage III pressure wound. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 5/21/26 at 8:56 a.m., with staff member T and NF3, staff member T opened resident #15's brief on the left side. Resident #15 was reported to have a Stage III pressure ulcer to her left buttock. Resident #15 had dried feces on the lower left side of her buttocks and had actively started to have a bowel movement. Staff member T cleaned the feces from resident #15. Staff member T cleansed the Stage III pressure wound with Vaish cleanser, and NF3 applied a dressing. NF3 left the room and staff member T requested staff member Q to assist in positioning resident #15 after the wound care. Staff member T and staff member Q placed the dirty brief back on resident #15 after the dressing change and left the dirty bed pad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was at risk of elopement, was supervised and doors were secured for 1 (#5) of 5 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #5 eloping from the facility overnight, and found by police the next day. Findings include:Review of a facility investigation for resident #5's elopement, dated 4/16/26, showed resident #5 exited the facility unattended on 4/16/26 at approximately 10:00 a.m. Resident #5 was identified as a high risk for elopement, and had a WanderGuard device in place. Resident #5 had a BIMS of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was located on 4/17/26 and transported to the hospital for evaluation. Resident #5 was found to have no injuries.Review of the facility's document, Root Cause Analysis, dated 4/21/26, showed the root cause of the elopement was identified as, failure of a staff member to follow established facility policies and procedures related to elopement prevention, resident supervision, and Wander guard monitoring process. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required timeframe of an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 (#73); and failed to report the investigative findings for allegations of abuse for 4 (#s 10, 46, 67 and 76) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include:1. Review of resident #73's Behavior Progress Note, dated 12/14/25, showed: Resident has repeatedly been removed from female resident rooms. Resident has also been rubbing legs of other female residents. Resident has been repeatedly corrected by staff and educated on inappropriate behavior. During an interview on 2/24/26 at 4:51 p.m., staff member A stated they were reviewing a former resident's chart (resident #73) who wanted to return to the facility. Upon the review, they noted a progress note which should have been a reportable event, sent to the State Survey Agency, but had not been reported. Staff member A stated they did not know of the incident before the review and would be making a late report to the State Survey Agency regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Quarterly MDS assessments in the required timeframe of 14 days after the ARD for 6 (#s 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 55) of 25 sampled resident assessments. Findings include:During an interview on 2/26/26 at 8:48 a.m., staff member M stated he started covering as the MDS Coordinator at the end of December 2025. Staff member M stated he believed the facility had Quarterly MDS's that were late when he started. Staff member M stated he was not sure why they were late.- A review of resident #11's medical record showed a Quarterly MDS was scheduled with an ARD of 12/18/25. The Quarterly assessment was due to be completed on 1/1/26. The MDS was completed late on 1/8/26.- A review of resident #55's medical record showed a Quarterly MDS was scheduled with an ARD of 12/23/25. The Quarterly assessment was due to be completed on 1/6/26. The MDS was completed late on 1/8/26.- A review of resident #7's medical record showed a Quarterly MDS was scheduled with an ARD of 1/1/26. The Quarterly assessment was due to be completed on 1/15/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident inappropriate nonconsensual contact for 2 (#s 46 and 73) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #73's Behavior Progress Note, dated 12/14/25, showed: Resident has repeatedly been removed from female resident rooms. Resident has also been rubbing legs of other female residents. Resident has been repeatedly corrected by staff and educated on inappropriate behavior. During an interview on 2/24/26 at 4:51 p.m., staff member A stated they were reviewing a former resident's chart (resident #73) who wanted to return to the facility. Upon the review, they noted a progress note for a reportable event that was not reported or investigated involving residents #'s 46 and 73. Staff member A stated they did not know of the incident before the review and would be sending a late report to the State Survey Agency regarding the incident and conducting an investigation (See F609 for details of allegation). Review of the facility's reported incidents, sent to the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Comprehensive MDS assessment in accordance with the required timeframe of the 14th day of the residents stay for 1 (#67) of 25 sampled residents. The failure had the potential to prevent the resident from achieving their highest practicable level of function. Findings include:During an interview on 2/25/26 at 2:58 p.m., staff member A stated the previous MDS Coordinator left the position in late November 2025 or early December 2025, and there was a lapse in coverage of the position duties prior to the current MDS Coordinator starting. Staff member A stated this may have contributed to the MDS's that were completed late.During an interview on 2/26/26 at 8:48 a.m., staff member M stated he started covering as the MDS Coordinator at the end of December 2025. Staff member M stated he believed the facility had MDSs that were late when he started. Staff member M stated he was not sure why they were late.A review of resident #67's medical record showed an admission date of 1/8/26, and an admission MDS was scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility licensed nursing staff, assigned to complete treatments on a resident's burn, failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice related to wound assessments, treatments, and documentation of the wound details and current status, for 1 (#73) of 25 sampled residents. The failure placed the resident at elevated risk for the delayed identification of complications and or ineffective treatments not being addressed promptly, due to the lack of wound information in the resident's medical record. Findings include:During an interview on 2/24/26 at 11:12 a.m., staff member B stated resident #73 had obtained a burn injury to his lower abdomen, groin, and right hip on 10/30/25, after accidentally spilling hot soup onto himself. The right hip wound was a second-degree burn with blistering, and the lower abdomen and groin were first-degree burns. Staff member B stated wound treatments were initiated on the notification to the provider about the burns, which was on 10/30/25, and the burn treatments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to a resident's individualized plan of care regarding repositioning and elevation of the heels to prevent skin breakdown for 1 (#79) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 2/23/26 at 2:55 p.m., resident #79 was lying flat on her back with a pillow beneath her legs, but her heels and feet were still touching the bed. Resident #79 stated she was never repositioned by staff but would lie flat on her back very frequently. Resident #79 stated, They're (staff) supposed to not let my heels touch the bed, but stated the staff members would often forget to do this task.During an observation and interview on 2/24/26 at 2:12 p.m., resident #79 was lying on her back and had a pillow underneath her legs. Her heels were not elevated but were resting on the pillow's surface. Resident #79 stated she was dependent on staff for help and would rarely get out of bed for activities. During an observation on 2/25/26 at 2:28 p.m., resident #79 was lying on her back and had her heels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an unavoidable accident to the level necessary to ensure appropriate measures were implemented to prevent recurrences for 1 (#73) of 25 sampled residents. The resident spilled soup on himself, causing burn(s), but it was unclear (upon watching video footage) who the person was who provided the resident with the hot soup, and or what action was taken to investigate the incident further in an attempt to prevent future recurrences of this nature. The facility treated the resident's burn(s), which did heal. Findings include: During an interview on 2/24/26 at 10:20 a.m., staff member B stated resident #73 sustained a burn injury after spilling hot soup onto himself on 10/30/25. Staff member B stated NF3 reported he had reviewed the facility's video footage of the incident and observed a tall male visitor in street clothes handing resident #73 a container. Staff member B stated NF3 did not offer any additional information on the investigation, including whether there had been a review of video footage near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan reflecting a resident's past trauma, did not address his desire for sexual activities on the individualized care plan, or initiate behavior monitoring for potential sexual behaviors; and the facility did not identify the need for additional mental health trauma-based services timely for 1 (#73) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the resident's risk of negative outcomes and or behaviors continuing to be unaddressed or unmonitored, which could affect 2 residents (#s 22 and 46). Findings include:During an interview on 2/24/26 at 5:05 p.m., staff member N stated she witnessed resident #73 assisting resident #46 with eating. She stated resident #73 had his hand on resident #46's thigh. She said she felt it was inappropriate and asked resident #73 to remove his hand. Staff member N stated she was not aware if resident #73 had a care plan or was to be monitored for any sexual behaviors.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications to be administered matched the dose on the medication administration record for 2 (#s 14 and 51), and failed to ensure the medication, Voltaren gel, was measured appropriately for 1 (#14) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 10.34%. Findings include:1. During an interview and observation on 2/24/26 at 7:32 a.m., staff member I prepared the morning medications for resident #14. Staff member I stated the MAR and the medication bottle did not match for resident #14's glucosamine chondroitin. Staff member I stated the bottle was half empty and facility staff members had most likely been giving this medication in the past. The medication bottle showed Glucosamine Chondroitin Complex and had the following substances: Vitamin C 30 mg, Manganese 2.5 mg, Sodium 20 mg, Potassium 28 mg, Glucosamine Sulfate 250 mg, and Chondroitin Sulfate 200 mg. The MAR failed to show any other substances were ordered by the physician.Review of resident #14's EHR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical restraints for 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents, when the resident's stump was secured to the wheelchair with an elastic compression wrap that the resident could not release. There was no physician's order authorizing the use of the restraint, no assessment of the resident's need or risk for the restraint, and no monitoring for the restraint was documented. This deficient practice had the potential to cause an increased risk for impaired skin integrity, falls, and injury. Findings include:During an observation on 11/3/25 at 4:04 p.m., resident #4 was sitting in a wheelchair by the nursing station. Resident #4 had a left below-the-knee amputation that was tied to the left footrest of the wheelchair by a tan colored compression wrap. Resident #4 was pulling at the compression wrap and was unable to remove it. When resident #4 was asked if he could remove the compression wrap, he shook his head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within the 48-hour required time frame, that included resident specific needs for activities of daily living for 1 (#3) of 6 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all new admissions into the facility. Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 11/4/25 at 1:41 p.m., resident #3 was standing at the nursing station. Resident #3 had on a red colored t-shirt and a pair of jeans. Resident #3's shirt had dried food debris on it, and the jeans had dried brown stains consistent with what appeared to be coffee. There were multiple spots noted on resident #3's jeans. Resident #3 stated he needed assistance at times with dressing and hygiene because of his wound. Resident #3 stated he had been wearing the same pair of jeans for multiple consecutive days.During an interview on 11/4/25 at 2:58 p.m., NF6 stated resident #3 had some forgetfulness and confusion at times and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered, comprehensive care plan that assessed the dental status for 1(#4) of 6 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential for resident needs to be unmet by staff. Findings include:During an observation on 11/3/25 at 4:04 p.m., resident #4 was sitting in a wheelchair by the nursing station. Resident #4 was noted to be lacking teeth.During an interview on 11/4/25 at 7:50 a.m., staff member G stated resident #4 had dentures and was seen at a dental clinic last week. Staff member G stated family had provided resident #4 with another pair of dentures because his had been lost.During an interview on 11/4/25 at 12:25 p.m., staff member M stated resident #4 had dentures and most mornings he already had them in place when staff member M arrived on shift. Staff member M stated if the dentures were already in resident #4's mouth oral care did not need to be done. Staff member M stated all staff have access to the resident care plan. Staff member M stated there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan, based on the resident's refusal to wear a [NAME] brace, and the staff's application of a compression wrap to maintain stump positioning on the wheelchair leg rest, for 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents. The care plan did not reflect the restraint assessment findings, risks, or resident preferences related to the refusals of the [NAME] brace. Findings include:During an observation on 11/3/25 at 4:04 p.m., resident #4 was sitting in a wheelchair by the nursing station. Resident #4 had a left below the knee amputation that was tied to the left footrest of the wheelchair with a tan colored compression wrap. Resident #4 was pulling at the compression wrap and was unable to remove it. When resident #4 was asked if he could remove the compression wrap, he shook his head no.During an interview on 11/4/25 at 7:50 a.m., staff member G stated staff tied resident #4's stump to the leg rest on the wheelchair because, His…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were resolved in a timely manner related to delayed meal service for 3 (#s 18, 51, and 62) of 28 sampled residents. The failure placed the residents at elevated nutritional, psychosocial, and medication management risk. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 8/11/25 at 1:56 p.m., resident #18 was observed eating lunch in his room. Resident #18 stated, All the meals have been very late; 2 or more hours sometimes. I have complained, but it doesn't change anything. They just say they don't have enough help in the kitchen.2. During an interview on 8/11/25 at 3:12 p.m., resident #51 stated the meals are late almost all of the time. Resident #51 stated the meal delays have been going on for months.3. During an interview on 8/12/25 at 10:08 a.m., resident #62 stated the meals have been late regardless of where they are served. Resident #62 stated he had complained, stating, Nothing has changed; our meals are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharge/transfer for 3 (#s 79, 89 & 91) of 28 sampled residents. Findings include:1.During an interview on 8/12/25 at 11:50 a.m., NF1 stated she had not received any transfer or discharge notifications from the facility. During an interview on 8/14/25 at 8:30 a.m., Staff member D stated she was pretty new to this position. She started a year ago and had a quick orientation, and had not known the ombudsman notification was something she needed to do. Staff member D stated she received training from the regional nurse and will now be sending all the notifications of transfer and discharge on the first Wednesday of every month. Staff member D stated the facility now had a process for notification to the ombudsman for transfer and discharge. Review of resident #79's nursing progress notes, dated 6/5/25, showed the resident was transported to the Emergency Department for evaluation. The resident was admitted to the hospital and returned to the facility on 6/14/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were served timely for 5 (#s 4, 18, 20, 32, and 72) of 28 sampled and supplemental residents. This deficient practice led to frustration and distress over missing and/or being late to functions. Findings include:Review of the posted facility mealtimes showed: breakfast 7:30 a.m., lunch 11:30 a.m., and dinner 5:00 p.m.During an observation and interview on 8/11/25 at 2:15 p.m., resident #4 stated, Meals are always late, as you can see we just got lunch. A lunch tray was observed on the resident's table.During a resident council meeting surveyors were invited to on 8/12/25 at 3:03 p.m., the following interviews showed: Resident #72 stated, I have to rush to eat to make it to church on Sunday. I leave the room at 9:35 a.m. and need the tray before then for breakfast.Resident #18 stated he had gotten his evening medications before dinner the other night, the meal had been so late. Resident #32 stated lunch had been on time today and it was nice because she usually had to eat in a rush or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised to prevent an elopement for 1 (#31) of 28 sampled residents. Resident #31 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and was found by police in the park across the street from the facility. Findings include: Review of resident #31's reportable incident, dated 7/27/25, showed the resident had walked to the park across from the facility around 3:30 p.m. Staff were notified around 4:15 p.m., by local law enforcement, who stated the resident was seen at the park, and the resident fled when the law enforcement attempted to engage her. The incident report showed the facility administrator was notified at 4:23 p.m. and the resident was located at 4:31 p.m. The incident report showed the resident removed her wander guard, and exited through the main doors. During an interview on 8/14/25 at 9:00 a.m., staff member I stated resident #31 had a high BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 13. Staff member I stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper suprapubic catheter care and maintenance for 1 (#35) of 28 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an unidentified and untreated skin breakdown around the resident's suprapubic catheter. Findings include:During an interview and observation on 8/11/25 at 2:38 p.m., resident #35 stated the following regarding his suprapubic catheter: it would leak sometimes and the CNAs only clean around his catheter about every other brief change, he had frequent bladder infections, he had an open wound around his catheter that would get more red and gooey when the CNAs do not tape it to his leg, the staff rarely wear gowns when they clean around his catheter or change his briefs, and the CNAs usually clean his catheter tubing and around the insertion site with alcohol wipes. Resident #35's catheter was noted to not be secured to his leg to prevent pulling.During an interview and observation on 8/12/25 at 7:47 a.m., staff member J stated she was not clear what the actual orders were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a re-weigh, document refusals, and implement interventions aimed at addressing a severe weight loss for 1 (#64) of 28 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #64's documented weights showed:-1/3/25 163 lbs.,-2/1/25 162.4 lbs.,-3/11/25 163 lbs.,-4/5/25 163.4 lbs.,- May 2025 no weight documented or documented as refused on the treatment administration report or nursing progress notes.-6/1/25 146.6 lbs. This represented a 10.28% severe loss over two months.-July 2025 and August 2025 showed refusals in the resident's treatment administration record.There were no further documented weights.A request was made for resident #64's nutrition notes from February 2025 - current. Review of resident #64's weight change note, dated 6/5/25, showed, RD notes dramatic weight loss. Recommend re-weigh to confirm. There was no follow-up documentation related to the resident's re-weight or further dietary intervention.Review of resident #64's nursing progress note, dated 6/9/25, created 8/12/25, showed, late entry.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control practices related to hand hygiene and proper use of PPE during suprapubic catheter care for 1 (#35) of 28 sampled residents. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 8/12/25 at 7:47 a.m., staff member J entered resident #35's room without performing hand hygiene and then went back out of the room, after having touched items in the room, to perform hand hygiene. Staff member J performed suprapubic catheter care for resident #35 without wearing a gown. During an interview on 8/12/25 at 8:07 a.m., staff member O said she did not know why there was an EBP sign was on resident #35's door. Staff member O looked in resident # 35's care plan and stated, oh it's for his suprapubic catheter. During an interview on 8/12/25 at 8:10 a.m., staff member J stated she usually performed hand hygiene before entering a resident's room. Staff member J stated, the sign (EBP sign on resident #35's door) means that you put a gown on before doing cath care or any cares, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect 4 residents (#s 7, 8, 11, and 13) from abuse, and failed to sufficiently monitor #8 when grabbing or intruding on the space of other residents. Resident #8's behavior preempted altercations with #13 when he tried to push or remove #8 from his room. Both resident #8 and #13 sustained injuries in the altercations or when falling during the fighting. The 4 residents identified were out of 6 sampled residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations. Findings include: a. Review of an incident reported to the State Survey Agency, dated 6/2/25 at 3:30 p.m., showed resident #8 approached resident #7 in a common area located near the nursing station. Resident #8 grabbed resident #7 by the back of his shirt, pulled him up and out of his (resident #7's) wheelchair, which resulted in both residents falling to the ground. The report showed resident #7 was not exhibiting any behaviors to provoke the physical interaction. The two residents were separated, and resident #8 was placed on enhanced monitoring for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given on time, no more than one hour before or one hour after the administration time, for 4 (#s 4, 15, 16, and 19); and failed to give the right medication to the right resident for 2 (#s 15 and 16) of 4 residents sampled for appropriate medication administration. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 8:55 a.m., resident #19 stated she has gotten her evening medications late several times. Resident #19 stated the late medications usually happened on weekends and night shift. Review of resident #10's Medication Admin Audit Report, dated 6/15/25, 6/16/25, and 6/17/25, showed the following times the medications were scheduled, and then the documented times they were actually administered: - 6/14/25 at midnight, buprenorphine-narcan 2-0.5 mg given at 1:45 a.m., - 6/14/25 at 6:00 p.m., lidocaine external patch given at 9:00 p.m., - 6/14/25 at 7:00 p.m., Cymbalta 60 mg given at 9:10 p.m., - 6/14/25 at 7:00 p.m., insulin aspart 3 units given at 9:13 p.m., - 6/15/25 at midnight,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for 3 (#s 7, 8, and 13) of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a Facility-Reported Incident, dated 6/2/25 at 3:30 p.m., and submitted to the State Survey Agency reporting portal, showed an altercation which involved resident #7 and resident #8. The report showed resident #8 approached resident #7 from behind and pulled him up and out of his wheelchair, causing both resident #7 and the wheelchair to tip over and fall to the floor. The report showed resident #7, . was not engaging in any distress [sic] behaviors at the time, but was saying 'help' calmly and repetitively, a known behavioral baseline. Review of resident #7's nursing progress notes, dated 6/2/25, failed to show the incident described above. The resident's medical record progress notes failed to show documentation of an assessment of resident #7's physical and psychosocial condition after the incident. Review of resident #8's nursing progress notes, dated 6/2/25, failed to show the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect, when leaving a resident on the toilet without a call light within reach, for 40 minutes, for 1 (#14); and neglected to ensure dignity was upheld for a resident while being transported to the shower for 1 (#52) who felt humiliated, of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused emotional distress for resident #14 and #52; and increased the risk of skin break down or a fall to occur for resident #14. Findings include: 1. Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 12/12/24, reflected resident #14 was left on the toilet by a CNA, who believed another CNA would be getting her off the toilet, on 12/10/24. Resident #14 was found crying in her room, stating a CNA left her on the toilet. During an interview on 2/24/25 at 3:01 p.m., resident #14 stated she was scared during the night the staff left her on the toilet. Resident #14 stated she could not reach the call light and had to get herself out of the bathroom. Review of resident #14's progress note, dated 12/11/24, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 2/24/25 at 1:17 p.m., the following items were found in the kitchen storage: Open Worcestershire sauce: expired 9/30/24 Open Pancake/waffle mix- no date Open Chili Powder: expired 10/13/24 Open Parsley Flakes: no date Open Montreal Steak Seasoning: no date Open Pepperoni: no dates Blueberries: no date Opened Tortilla Shells: no date Opened Dry Yeast: no date Opened Mango preserves: no date Pineapple: use by date 2/20 Open Tuscan [NAME] Dressing: expired 12/20 Open Fat Free Italian dressing: expired 11/14 Open Thousand Island Dressing: expired 10/27 Open one-gallon balsamic Vinegar: no date Open bottle of molasses with brown crusty cap: no date Open Panco breading: no date Open bag of sugar: no date and sitting open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete maintenance services necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for 3 (#s 28, 29, and 72) of 29 sampled residents. Two residents, #s 28 and 29, were aware and not happy about the concerns identified in their rooms. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 9:40 a.m., resident #28 was resting in her bed, with her face against the wall, on her left side. Resident #28's wall had an approximately four inch wide by 12-inch-long tear in the sheetrock. The powdered sheetrock was exposed, and there appeared to be digging marks in the sheetrock. Resident #28 stated, That wall's a mess, they need to do something about it. In the bathroom, the paint was peeled away around the toilet, leaving an uncleanable surface. 2. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 8:27 p.m., resident #72 was in bed sleeping. A hole in the white floor linoleum approximately 12 inches long by five inches wide was noted on the floor of the bathroom, to the left of the toilet. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to cover catheter bags for 2 (#s 2 and 24) of 29 sampled residents, and staff were aware the covers should be utilized for resident dignity, and one resident was not ok with the bag being uncovered. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/25/25 at 11:13 a.m., resident #2's catheter bag was attached to the bed and not covered with yellow urine in the bag. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 11:24 a.m., resident #2 was in her room with the curtain pulled. Resident #2's catheter bag was hanging from the bed and not covered, with urine in the bag. When asked about her catheter bag, resident #2 stated, I just figured that was how the bag was supposed to be, I didn't know there was another option. 2. During an observation and interview on 2/24/25 at 2:30 p.m., resident #24 was in bed resting, her door was open, and the catheter bag was exposed, with urine in the bag. The catheter bag was hanging from her bed. Resident #24 stated she was not okay with her catheter bag being exposed. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise the self-administration of insulin for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of a negative outcome if the resident in the event the medication and monitoring were not handled properly by the resident. Findings include: During an interview on 2/24/25 at 7:53 a.m., resident #29 stated he gave his own insulin and monitored his own blood glucose levels. When asked if the nurses watched him administer his insulin, resident #29 stated, No, I do it myself and have for years. During an observation and interview on 2/26/25 at 8:05 a.m., resident #29 demonstrated how his continuous glucose monitoring system worked with the arm sensor he wore and the app on his mobile phone. Resident #29 stated, I tell the nurses what my blood glucose was when asked by the nurses. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 8:52 a.m., staff member G stated resident #29 should have had a self-administration of medication assessment, but was not sure where to find it. Staff member G stated she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an event with a staff member accepting money from a resident, in exchange for craft items, for 1 (#41) and failed to identify missing items for 2 (#s 37 and 280) of 29 sampled residents. Residents #37 and #280 were frustrated and concerned about the missing items, and resident #41 was upset and worried about a staff member accepting money from a resident. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 2/24/25 at 4:05 p.m., resident #41 was in her room; her room was full of crafts and puzzles she had completed or was working on. Resident #41 stated, I'm worried about saying anything; I'm afraid of retaliation. I have had some issues with a staff member, and she still works on my hall. I have told the previous administration about this issue, and nothing was done. Staff member U brought in some craft stuff for me to look through. I thought she brought it in for me to use. I picked out what I wanted and then offered to pay a little bit. Staff member U said,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency within the required timeframe for 1 resident (#14); and failed to report their investigative findings to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner for 1 resident (#52), of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 12/12/24, reflected resident #14 was left on the toilet by a CNA who believed another CNA would be getting her off the toilet on 12/10/24. Resident #14 was found crying in her room stating a CNA left her on the toilet at 7:30 p.m. The alleged neglect initial report was not submitted to the State Survey Agency until 12/12/24 at 9:55 p.m. Review of the Facility Reported Incident final report, submitted 12/19/24, reflected a staff member was terminated due to the failure to report the incident to the facility abuse coordinator. 2. Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 12/30/24, showed resident #52 was transported by staff from his room, to the hall's shower room, naked and not covered. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete investigation of a facility reported incident was completed, and failed to maintain and provide thorough investigation of the findings for 1 resident (#52) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 12/30/24, showed resident #52 was transported by staff from his room, to the hall's shower room, naked and not covered. The findings, submitted 1/8/25, showed one staff member was terminated for the event and the facility provided a final written warning to the other staff member involved. During an interview on 2/25/25 at 2:04 p.m., staff member B stated there was no facility reported incident documentation left by the previous administrator and stated the typical process is more accurate. An initial request was made to the facility for documentation of the facility's investigation notes for #52's reportable event on 12/30/24. The facility provided the following: - two written statements from staff members who learned of the incident from resident #52 while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the dental needs of a resident on the comprehensive MDS assessment for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk to cause dental related complications due to lack of accurate assessment. Findings include: During an interview on 2/25/25 at 7:53 a.m., resident #29 stated he lost his dentures seven years ago, and was not offered help to get new dentures. During an observation on 2/25/25 at 12:23 p.m., resident #29 was observed being unable to chew a piece of broccoli and took it out of his mouth because he could not chew it. Resident #29 stated he has difficulty eating overcooked meat and undercooked vegetables without dentures. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 3:23 p.m., staff member M stated resident #29 was screened during admission for his dental needs, and most recently six weeks ago, which showed no dental issues, and stated, no indications or difficulties. Staff member M stated the MDS admission process was a team effort; nurses did a head-to-toe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan, to include pertinent information to safely address resident care needs, within 48 hours of admission, for 2 (#75 and #282) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #75's electronic medical record showed resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #75's baseline care plan showed a completion date of 12/14/24. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 3:00 p.m., staff member D reported nursing staff was responsible for completing the baseline care plan. Staff member D stated the care plans were updated as necessary during quarterly care plan meetings. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 4:06 p.m., staff member B reported nursing staff were responsible for initiating baseline care plans, and care plan updates were completed at IDT meetings and resident care conferences. Staff member B stated resident #75's baseline care plan was completed late, and she did not know…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to include dialysis for 1 (#72); and, failed to include a resident's dental and respiratory needs on the comprehensive assessment, for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused staff to not complete cares required post dialysis for resident #72 resulting in a risk for harm related to post-dialyzed complications, and increased the risk for resident #29 having respiratory issues and difficulty with eating. Findings include: During an observation on 2/24/25 at 3:01 p.m., staff member I stated resident #72 went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 12:07 p.m., resident #72 stated staff do not take her vitals, assess her dialysis site, or check on her when she returned from dialysis. Resident #72 showed the surveyor her access site. Review of resident #72's EHR, dated 2/25/25, reflected no dialysis assessments had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly complete an elopement evaluation for a resident who was an elopement risk, and had attempted to elope. The resident was oriented to person only, upon admission, for 1 (#282) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #282's responsible party to worry about his safety. Findings include: During an interview on 2/26/25 at 3:45 p.m., NF3 stated staff did not notify her of the use of a wander guard device for resident #282 following his attempt to leave the facility on 2/17/25. NF3 stated she had been to the facility to visit resident #282, and he stated, Look at this stupid thing on me. NF3 stated she asked resident #282 what happened, and why the device was on him. NF3 stated resident #282 replied to her that he tried to leave to go home. NF3 stated she is worried about him and does not feel staff were doing enough to supervise resident #282, based on his medical condition. NF3 stated she was concerned he was crying a lot when she went to visit him, and stated, How can he have already had two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing as ordered for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of respiratory infections. Findings include: During an observation on 2/24/25 at 3:28 p.m., on 2/25/25 at 7:53 a.m., and on 2/26/25 at 8:09 a.m., resident #29's oxygen tubing, connected to his CPAP, was dated 11/3/24 on a piece of tape wrapped around the tubing closest to the machine. During an interview during the 2/26/25 observation, resident #29 stated he had been using a CPAP machine at night for a long time, and he owned it. Resident #29 stated no one checked his CPAP machine or the oxygen tubing, and it, . has never been changed before. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 8:54 a.m., staff member F stated CNAs and Nurses were in charge of changing oxygen tubing, but mostly she did it. Staff member F stated oxygen tubing should be changed every 30 days. Staff member F stated she did not know the process for keeping track of oxygen tubing changes, and staff used to write the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pre and post assessment care for a resident receiving dialysis for 1 (#72) of 3 sampled residents receiving dialysis. This deficient practice caused staff to not complete cares required post dialysis for resident #72 resulting in a potential for harm, including hypotension, renal failure, and infection at the access site. Findings include: During an observation on 2/24/25 at 3:01 p.m., resident #72 was not in her room. Staff member I stated resident #72 was at dialysis. Staff member I stated resident #72 went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 12:07 p.m., resident #72 was in her room, in bed. Resident #72 stated staff do not take her vitals when she returned from dialysis, did not assess her access site, and the nurse did not come in to check on her when she returned from dialysis. Resident #72 showed the surveyor her access site. Review of resident #72's EHR, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled subcutaneous medications were administered by staff licensed to administer the medications, for 1 (#3) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 2/26/25 at 3:00 p.m., staff member D stated the facility had two full time certified medication aide II's who were utilized for medication administration to residents. Staff member D stated the medication aides are allowed to administer prefilled scheduled subcutaneous medications. Staff member D then referenced the Montana Code Annotated 2023 and stated, It appears the medication aide II is only allowed to administer prelabeled, pre-drawn insulin subcutaneously. Staff member D stated, Moving forward, all non-insulin subcutaneous injections will be administered by licensed nursing staff. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 4:08 p.m., staff member V stated she had administered resident #3's scheduled subcutaneous medications over the past six months. Staff member V stated because the medications were prefilled, and the injection was given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the resident's oral health needs for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to choke on their food. Findings include: During an interview on 2/25/25 at 7:53 a.m., resident #29 stated he had not had dentures during his entire residency at the facility, and staff had never asked him if he would like to get new ones. Resident #29 said it was sometimes hard to eat food. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 12:23 p.m., resident #29 took a piece of broccoli out of his mouth, because he could not chew it. Resident #29 stated he had difficulty eating overcooked meat and undercooked vegetables without dentures. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 8:36 a.m., staff member F stated she was very familiar with resident #29. Staff member F stated resident #29 did not have dentures, and assumed he did not want them, I never thought to ask. Staff member F stated the ADON would set up the dental appointment if resident #29 wanted dentures. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated a resident's intolerances and preferences for 1 (#29) of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #29 to feel frustrated at his preferences not being met. Findings include: During an observation on 2/24/25 at 3:28 p.m., an untouched food tray was on resident #29's bed while resident #29 was out of the facility for dialysis. During an observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 7:53 a.m., resident #29 picked up a banana off his breakfast tray and set it aside. Resident #29 appeared frustrated, and stated he was often given bananas with his breakfast even though he was on dialysis and did not want them. Resident #29 stated his breakfast was sometimes late on dialysis days, and he does not get to eat breakfast. Resident #29 stated, The lunches they used to give me were spoiled by the time I could eat them at dialysis. During an observation and interview on 2/26/25 at 8:20 a.m., resident #29 was wheeling down E hall with cranberry juice, and stated, They forget my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, a facility staff member failed to communicate the location of a resident, when the resident was dropped off for an appointment at the dialysis center and left in the bathroom unattended, and the resident was cognitivey impaired, and elopement risk, and unable to assist himself out of dangerous situations. The resident later located in the bathroom and missed his dialysis appointment, for 1 (#1) of 7 sampled residents transported by facility staff for offsite medical appointments. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, sent to the State Survey Agency for resident #1, dated 11/1/24, showed on 11/1/24, at 6:30 a.m., Resident #1 was transported by the facility's transportation driver to a scheduled dialysis appointment. Upon arriving at the dialysis center, the resident urgently requested to use the bathroom. The driver rang the doorbell three times to gain access and was eventually buzzed in by a medical staff. Once inside, the driver assisted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provided pain medication as ordered to relieve chronic pain, this failure caused the resident to voice pain, for 1 (#69) of 3 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 8/6/24, showed an allegation of neglect concerning pain medication administration. The report showed NF2 failed to medicate one resident for pain (#69) on 8/6/24. The facility's investigation showed NF2 reported she had forgotten to give the medication. Review of resident #69's MAR, dated August of 2024, showed the following order, HYDROcodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 7.5 - 325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth five times a day related to OTHER CHRONIC PAIN (G89.29) Hold if sedated or SBP <90. Order Date- 7/26/2024 1131 (11:31 a.m.) [sic] The resident's MAR showed the 1:00 a.m. hydrocodone-acetaminophen dose on 8/6/24 was held. The 5:00 a.m. dose of hydrocodone-acetaminophen on 8/6/24 was not administered as scheduled. Review of resident #69's progress notes, dated 8/6/24, failed to show the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency a facility reported event involving a resident who was denied reentry after discharging against medical advice from an acute hospital for 1 (#1) in the required timeframe; and failed to report incident findings to the State Survey Agency within the five-day required time frame for 11 (#s 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident #1's electronic medical record nursing progress note, dated 5/23/24 at 6:12 a.m., showed staff member D stated, Received call from [Hospital Name] 2400 (12:00 a.m.) showing this resident had left hospital AMA and was heading back to facility in a cab. Called administration to ask what to do. ADON attempted to call administrator and DON, then came to facility. Resident is outside in the cab, and when we had not heard back from administration told cab driver to take him back to the ER. Cab left with resident inside. Later a girl rang the doorbell and stated there is an old man sitting on the bench, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-27 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the reason for a facility-initiated transfer to a resident or the resident's representative, for 3 (#s 29, 42, and 56) of 29 sampled residents, Findings include: 1. Review of resident #29's electronic medical record showed no documentation of a Notice of Transfer. A request was made by the survey team for the Notice of Transfer on 2/26/25, and no documentation was provided by the end of the survey. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 8:47 a.m., staff member F stated when a resident was transferred to the hospital, she would fill out a Notice of Transfer form, and send it with the resident. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 4:19 p.m., staff member B stated the facility ran out of transfer forms for a week during the time of resident #29's transfer. 2. Review of resident #42's electronic medical record showed resident #42 was transported to the hospital for an acute change in condition on 11/1/24. The medical record failed to show the required written notice, with the reason for the transfer, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-27 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a Notice of Bed Hold to a resident or the resident's representative, for 2 (#s 29 and 56) of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 4:19 p.m., staff member B stated a Notice of Bed Hold should be signed by someone, . either a POA, or they can take a verbal over the phone, and we can sign it. Review of resident #29's Bed Hold Notice, dated 12/22/24, reflected it was unsigned by resident #29 or resident #29's representative. 2. Review of resident #56's electronic medical record failed to show the Notice of Bed Hold had been provided to the resident or the resident's representative, on 9/24/24 and 12/11/24, which was when the resident was transferred to a hospital. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 3:00 p.m., staff member D stated a Notice of Bed Hold was provided to a resident or resident representative prior to a resident leaving the facility. Staff member D stated the nurse would complete the form and it would then be scanned into the resident's electronic medical record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$62,797 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $21,847 — penalty dated 2024-06-06
  • $40,950 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHARLY BELLO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 07/01/2023
CASHMER LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
FEY, KRISTINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 07/01/2023
FEY, DANIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, CAMERONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, SERENEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
MYERS, WALTERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
SWAIN, JAREDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
ANDERSON, WENDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
RIGGIN, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SEVERA, LARRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$434K
Related-party expense14% of expenses

This home reported $434K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,176per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Montana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Montana
$8,973/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,075/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 275120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next