No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Creekside Village Rehabilitation And Nursing LLC

1000 E Stuart St, Fort Collins, CO 80525 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (970) 482-5712 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$48,875 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $48,875 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1136 E Stuart St · (970) 221-1681 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2601 S Lemay Ave 42 · (970) 225-1234 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1643 S College Ave · (970) 472-2639 · Call to confirm hours
Park
842 E Stuart St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2101 S Lemay Ave · (970) 482-6425

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.8%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms31.6%8.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.2%13.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.7%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.6%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.4%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.241.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.071.741.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.2–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
74.4%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 74.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and were kept free from elopement for one (#13) of three residents at risk for elopement out of 24 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #13 with the supervision necessary to prevent elopement.Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairments and was assessed to require supervision to substantial assistance from staff for most activities of daily living. He needed supervision to touching assistance to walk ten feet, had a history of wandering and exit-seeking, and was at high risk of falling.Record review revealed that in October 2025, the resident began exhibiting exit-seeking behavior, packing his clothes, wandering, and pacing, and on 11/1/25 at 2:30 p.m., a nurse was notified by another resident that Resident #13 was outside and was walking away from the facility, approximately 20 minutes after he was last seen. The nurse on duty followed Resident #13,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors, affecting one (#11) of five residents out of 24 sample residents.Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy (seizure disorder) and acute kidney failure that required dialysis three days a week.Resident #11 was prescribed phenobarbital (anti-seizure medication), valproic acid (anti-seizure medication), clobazam (anti-seizure medication) and Depakote (anti-seizure medication). From [DATE] to [DATE] the resident was hospitalized due to seizure activity. Within 24 hours the resident was sent back to the hospital for more seizure activity. While at the hospital, it was recommended to increase the clobazam to twice a day. The facility failed to administer the resident's anti-seizure medications consistently. On [DATE] the resident was hospitalized again due to seizure activity. Review of the medication administration record (MAR), revealed the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#4, #22, and #23) of six residents of 24 sample residents received food prepared in the form designed to meet their individual needs. Resident #4 diagnoses of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had a physician's order for minced and moist diet texture (cannot bite off pieces of food but does have basic chewing ability). Resident #22 had diagnoses of dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, cognitive communication deficit, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #22 had a physician's order for soft and bite-sized texture (not able to bite off pieces of food safely but able to chew bite-sized pieces down into little pieces that are safe to swallow). Resident #23 had diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of seven residents reviewed for medication management were free from significant medication errors out of nine sample residents. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affects the blood vessels in the brain). On 6/20/25 certified nurse aide with medication authority (CNA-Med) #1 administered another resident's medications to Resident #7, including apixaban and clopidogrel (used to prevent blood clots), isosorbide (used to relax and widen the blood vessels and manage chest pain), lisinopril (used to treat high blood pressure), propranolol (used to lower heart rate and blood pressure), quetiapine (used to treat mental health conditions), Percocet (pain medication) and Fioreicet (used to treat tension headaches). The resident began to experience severe hypotension (a dangerously low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one (#3) of three sample residents. Resident #3 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident was at a high risk for falls related to being unaware of safety needs, paralysis, deconditioning, poor communication/comprehension, vision/hearing problems, gait/balance problems and incontinence. The resident was a substantial maximum assist of one staff member when the resident was able to use the bedside transfer pole. If the resident was unable to use the transfer pole, the staff were to use two staff persons with a Hoyer (mechanical) lift for transfers. The resident had a witnessed fall (lowered to the ground) during a transfer with the use of the transfer pole and one certified nurse aide (CNA) on 11/19/23 at 2:16 p.m. The resident was not assessed by a registered nurse (RN) before the resident was lifted from off the floor with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from abuse for three (#13, #206 and #103) of five residents investigated for abuse out of 40 sample residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was free from verbal abuse and mental anguish. The resident was unable to speak for herself. The resident was observed, by staff, as crying and tearful following the allegation involving certified nurse aide (CNA) #10. Additional allegations of abuse were discovered during the investigation for CNA #10. A resident alleged CNA #10 yelled at other residents and verbally abused resident #102. In addition, the facility failed to ensure safety for Resident #206 and Resident #103 resulting in physical abuse. Cross-reference F610: Evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse and Neglect Prohibition policy revised July 2018, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations for abuse were thoroughly investigated for one (#13) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 40 sample residents. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate verbal abuse allegations and the staff person continued to work with residents. The facility failed to interview the appropriate staff proceeding the allegation of abuse. The facility failed to interview the appropriate residents under the care of certified nurse aide (CNA) #10. The facility failed to document an accurate array of events for the allegation of abuse for Resident #13. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of CNA #10's alleged verbal abuse which resulted in additional allegations of abuse made by multiple residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse and Neglect Prohibition policy revised July 2018, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/18/19 at 11:30 a m. revealed, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in a timely manner to prevent worsening of a pressure injury, for one (#99) of one resident reviewed for pressure injury out of 40 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Document a thorough assessment of a newly identified pressure injury to the resident's left heel upon discovery; -Ensure Resident #99 received timely treatment for a pressure injury to the left heel; -Implement timely pressure reduction interventions for a newly identified pressure injury to the left heel; and -Notify the physician and responsible party timely of the pressure injury. The facility's failures led to the worsening of a pressure injury from a blister to an unstageable wound covered with black eschar. Findings include: Cross-reference F657, failure to develop a comprehensive care plan. I. Facility policy and procedure The Skin Management policy, dated July 2017, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a designated designated registered nurse (RN) acting as the director of nursing (DON). Specifically, the facility utilized the DON as a floor nurse and certified nurse aide (CNA) several times when the facility's average daily census was over 60 residents. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Nursing Services and Sufficient Staffing policy, not dated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/30/26 at 3:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The Director of Nursing (DON) may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. The facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The facility is required to provide licensed nursing staff 24 hours a day, along with other nursing personnel, including but not limited to nurse aides.II. Record review The daily assignment sheets were provided by the NHA on 4/30/26 at 9:20 a.m. The daily assignment sheets showed the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review and observations the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received food that was palatable, attractive and at an appetizing temperature.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' food was palatable in temperature. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Food Preparation Guidelines, 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/30/26 at 3:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to prepare foods in a manner to preserve or enhance a resident's nutrition and hydration status. Food shall be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. This includes, but is not limited to: Minimizing holding time prior to meal service. Food and drinks shall be palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Strategies to ensure resident satisfaction include: Serving hot foods/drinks hot and cold foods/drinks cold and addressing resident complaints about foods/drinks.II. Resident interviewsResident #42 was interviewed on 4/27/26 at 11:00 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the two of two nourishment refrigerators.Specifically, the facility to ensure safe and appropriate food storage of food items in the nourishment refrigerators. Findings include:I. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Regulations, (3/16/24) and retrieved on 5/5/26 read in pertinent part, Commercially processed food: open and hold cold, refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food prepared and packaged by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment and if the food is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded, the day the original container is opened in the food establishment shall be counted as day one and the day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to employ an infection preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to employ an infection preventionist (IP) with specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include:I. Record reviewThe facility provided a certificate of infection prevention training with an expiration date of 2024 for the current IP.II. Staff interviewsThe IP was interviewed on [DATE] at 3:00 p.m. The IP said she was the assistant director of nursing (ADON). She said she was combining responsibilities of the ADON and the IP. She said she did not realize her certification had expired. She said she started doing the training online, but was not able to complete the training to receive her certification. The chief nursing officer was interviewed on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. She said she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%).Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 44%, which was 11 errors out of 25 total opportunities for error. Findings include:I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed., E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607, Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment . Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration . To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights : 1. The right medication2. The right dose3. The right patient4. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards for two of three medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure inhaler medications and ophthalmic solution were marked with the date when the medications were opened;-Ensure insulin was labeled with the date they were opened;-Ensure there were no loose pills in the medication cart; and,-Ensure that expired medications were disposed of properly. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the manufacturer recommendations Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution prescribing information read in pertinent parts, Once opened, manufacturers recommend discarding eye drops after 28 days. Latanoprost 0.005% eye drops must be discarded four to six weeks after opening, regardless of the expiration date on the bottle. According to the Spiriva Respimat (tiotropium bromide) inhaler package insert, retrieved on 5/5/26 from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the resident's preferences on three of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to provide menus to residents in order for the residents to choose their meals and honor food preferences. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Food Preparation Guidelines policy and procedure, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/30/26 at 3:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Food and drinks shall be palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Strategies to ensure resident satisfaction include: Honoring resident preferences, as possible, regarding foods and drinks. Staff shall accommodate resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, providing appropriate alternatives when needed.II. Resident interviewsResident #5 was interviewed on 4/27/26 at 12:44 p.m. Resident #5 said she was not offered menus at night. She said a few times since her admission the night certified nurse aides (CNA) took her meal order for the next day, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for two (#5 and #54) of 18 residents reviewed out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #54 received showers consistently according to the residents' preferences and plan of care. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Showers policy, dated 12/4/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/30/26 at 3:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards or practice. Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident preferences and safety.II. Resident #5A. Resident statusResident #5, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included lymphedema,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#15) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from abuse and neglect out of 40 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #15 from physical abuse by Resident #10. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, implemented 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/28/26 at 1:10 p.m. The policy revealed, the facility provided protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing/implementing written policies/procedures that prohibited/prevented abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse was defined by the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which could include staff to resident abuse and certain resident-to-resident altercations. Abuse also included the deprivation by an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#9) of eight residents out of 40 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure physician's orders for wound care were continued after a hospitalization for Resident #9; and,-Ensure Resident #9's wound was addressed in a timely manner by the wound care physician. Findings include:I. Resident #9A. Resident statusResident #9, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE], was discharged to the hospital on 4/7/26 and returned to the facility on 4/9/26, discharged to the hospital on 4/11/26 and returned to the facility on 4/13/26. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, morbid obesity, hypo-osmolality (water retention) and hyponatremia (low sodium), and dependence on renal dialysis.The 4/21/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases on four out of six hallwaysSpecifically, the facility failed to ensure blood sugar glucometers were disinfected appropriately between residents. Findings include: I. Professional referenceAccording to the centers for disease control (CDC), Conditions for Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration, retrieved on 5/6/26 from https://www.cdc.gov/injection-safety/hcp/infection-control/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/blood-glucose-monitoring.html Clean and disinfect blood glucose meters after every use, per the manufacturer's instructions. Blood glucose meters can easily become contaminated during use. When used in healthcare or other group settings, germs and infections can spread if preventive measures are not in place.Dedicated meters should be stored in a manner that prevents cross-contamination and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety.Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to quality of life and quality of care. Findings include:I. Cross-referenced citationsCross-reference F 805: The facility failed to serve correct altered diet texture per physician order, resulting in an actual choking incident. The facility failed to ensure appropriate texture meals were served to multiple residents. Resident #4 was served a regular meal instead of a minced and moist diet on 1/13/26. He experienced a choking episode that required multiple attempts of Heimlich maneuver to dislodge the food from the airway. In addition, Resident #22 and #23 were served incorrect texture diets at the time of the survey. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide choices for preference of bathing schedule for one (#20) of five residents reviewed for self-determination out of 24 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #20 per his preference. Findings include:I. Failure to provide shower as scheduledA. Resident #20B. Resident statusResident #20, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included fracture of left tibia, and type 2 diabetes. The 12/14/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for a mental status score of 11 out of 15. The resident required partial to moderate assistance from staff for personal hygiene and showers. C. Resident interviewResident #20 was interviewed on 2/3/26 at 12:30 p.m. He said it was impossible to receive a shower at the facility. He said when he was initially admitted , he went several weeks without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#2 and #4) of 23 out of 24 sample residents were free from abuse and neglect.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #4 were kept free from physical abuse from Resident #1.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, implemented 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/9/26 at 9:15 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, records review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor the resident for unnecessary psychotropic medications needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one (#13) of three residents reviewed for use of psychotropic medication out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure the physician's order for Resident #13's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (antianxiety medication) was reevaluated and a rationale was provided by the physician to justify the continued use of the psychotropic medication beyond the 14-day limit; and,-Ensure behavior and side-effect monitoring were in place for Resident #13's lorazepam and Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) medications. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Use of Psychotropic Medications policy and procedure, revised 4/28/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/9/26 at 2:45 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Psychotropic medications are to be used only when a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure food in the dry storage area and the refrigerator were labeled appropriately; and, -Ensure a system was in place to ensure foods that were stored in the walk-in refrigerator maintained the correct temperature while the walk-in refrigerator was repaired. Findings include:I. Failure to ensure foods were labeled and datedA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Regulations, (3/16/24) retrieved on 9/15/25 read in pertinent part, Commercially processed food: open and hold cold, refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food prepared and packaged by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment and if the food is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded, the day the original container is opened in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #4) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of seven sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #1 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #2; and, -Ensure Resident #4 was kept free from sexual abuse by Resident #3.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy, revised 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/4/25. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Examples include but are not limited to:-Responding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of physical abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for two of three alleged abuse violations.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Submit a final report of the facility's investigation of a physical abuse allegation involving Resident #3 and Resident #4 to the State Agency timely; and,-Submit a final report of the facility's investigation of a physical abuse allegation involving Resident #5 and Resident #6 to the State Agency timely.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 4/11/25 was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/7/25 at 2:50 p.m. The policy revealed the facility would provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Repair detached and soiled hallway ceiling tiles; -Repair improperly secured light fixtures; -Maintain swamp coolers in a safe, functional, and sanitary condition; and, -Repair sagging drywall caused by inadequate attachment to the supporting framing. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A request was made to the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/13/25 for the facility's policy for maintaining a safe and sanitary environment; however, the policy was not provided by the end of the survey (on 5/13/25). II. Observations On 5/12/25, environmental observations of the facility were conducted throughout the day, beginning at 10:21 a.m. The following was observed. A. Ceiling tiles Several ceiling tiles were detached from their mounts. Additionally, ceiling tiles revealed structural weakening and visible wear. The surfaces of the ceiling tiles were discolored in yellow and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#10 and #13) of five residents out of 11 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #10 from physical abuse by Resident #12; and, -Protect Resident #13 from verbal abuse by Resident #12. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 4/11/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/13/25 at 5:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. 'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for medication errors out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was administered antibiotic medications per physician's orders. Findings include: I. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included diverticulitis of intestine part unspecified with perforation and abscess without bleeding (disease that causes inflammation and infection in the intestine), abscess of intestine, lower abdominal pain unspecified and bipolar disorder (mental illness). The 5/6/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. B. Resident interview Resident #1 was interviewed on 5/12/25 at 3:28 p.m. She said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#13) of four residents investigated for abuse out of 13 sample residents was kept free from physical abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #13 from physical abuse by Resident #12. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, revised on 6/11/24, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 2/20/25 at 2:42 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Every resident has the right to be free from abuse. All occurrences of resident abuse shall be promptly reported to the abuse coordinator for investigation. The facility will ensure that all residents are protected during and after abuse investigations by: -Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim; -Increasing supervision of the alleged victim and the other residents as indicated; and, -Providing emotional support to the resident during and after the investigation. Sexual abuse is non-consensual contact of any type with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#3 and #8) of five residents reviewed out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and #8, who were dependent on staff for bathing, received their scheduled showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Shower/Bathing policy, revised October 2010, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/24/24 at 1:32 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Shower/bathing schedules are determined based on resident preference, including type, frequency and time of day. The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL (activities of daily living) record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. 2. The amount of assistance required to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0555 — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a choice of attending physician to residents. Specifically, the facility switched to a new provider group of attending physicians and did not notify all of the residents or provide choices. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Choice of Attending Physician policy was requested from the director of nursing (DON) on 7/17/24 at 11:38 a.m. -The policy was not received by the end of the survey on 7/17/24. II. Resident interviews Resident #3 was interviewed on 7/17/24 at 11:54 a.m. Resident #3 said he remembered a meeting where the new provider came and introduced herself. However, he said there was no other communication from the facility regarding a new provider. He said the decision to bring in a new provider for the facility was made by the facility corporation and he was not given a choice in the matter. He said the nursing staff told him he had to use the new provider and he had no choice in his provider. Resident #3 said he received nothing in writing about the change or what to do if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was served palatable in taste, texture and temperature. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Meal Preparation for Nutritive Value and Palatability policy, revised April 2023, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 4/1/24 at 6:38 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, Food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Meal service is timed for tray/cart delivery within reasonable time limits to preserve temperature and quality of food. Resident's comments are noted in resident council meeting minutes with appropriate action taken per response or grievance form. II. Resident interviews Resident #15 was interviewed on 3/27/24 at 11:12 a.m. Resident #15 said some food tasted good but residents asked for more and sometimes the kitchen said they were out of the food item. Resident #43 was interviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen, main dining room, one of two nourishment rooms and one of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff performed hand hygiene and glassware was handled appropriately in the main dining room; -Ensure staff washed hands and changed single use gloves appropriately while plating and serving resident meals in the main kitchen; -Ensure food was labeled and dated and disposed of timely in one of two nourishment rooms; and, -Ensure food items on meal trays were covered during transport in the hallway during meal delivery to resident rooms. Findings include: I. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene and glassware was handled appropriately in the main dining room. A. Professional references The Colorado Retail Food Regulations, effective 3/16/24, were retrieved 4/8/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations. The regulations read…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for three (#15, #37 and #60) of seven residents reviewed for ADLs out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15, #37 and #60 received showers as scheduled. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, revised March 2018, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 4/1/24 at 4:45 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and maintain the residents' dignity for two (#45 and #57) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect out of 29 sample residents Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #45 was offered his breakfast and lunch in a timely manner; and, -Ensure staff knocked and identified themselves prior to entering Resident #57's room. , Findings include: I. Resident #45 A. Resident status Resident #45, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, cervical disc degeneration and spondylosis (degeneration of the neck). According to the 1/4/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, Resident #45 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He was dependent on assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, and transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from significant medication errors for one (#1) of six residents of 29 sample residents reviewed for medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received all of his medications per the physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Medication Administration Policy, dated 2/29/24, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 4/2/22 at 5:57 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, Resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely, and sanitary manner. Medications are prepared, administered, and recorded only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy, or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medication. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician or physician extender. If a dose is inconsistent with the resident's age and condition or a medication order is inconsistent with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#13) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services, such as dental services, out of 29 sample residents received routine dental care obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #13 with routine dental care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dental Services policy, revised December 2016, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 4/2/24 at 5:57 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through a contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly, referral to the resident's personal dentist, referral to community dentists or referral to other health care organizations that provide dental services. Social services representatives will assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and for reimbursement of dental services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the laundry area was free from multiple environmental concerns. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Submitting a Maintenance Request form was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 4/2/24 at 3:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Maintenance requests need to be submitted. Fill out and submit the work order. Instructions for completing the work order were on the form. -A policy regarding the protocol for environmental issues within the facility was not provided by the end of the survey on 4/2/24. I. Observations and interview On 4/2/24 at 9:45 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., the facility's laundry area was observed with the environmental services director (ESD). The following concerns were observed: -The exhaust fan in the soiled linen room was not on. The fan's cover was off and wires were hanging out of the fan box. The ESD said she did not know how long the fan had been broken.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#3) of five residents' call light system was functioning out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room call light was functioning properly. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Accommodation of Needs policy, revised 2021, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 12/19/23 at 11:51 a.m. The policy revealed the facility's environment and staff behaviors were directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being. The resident's individual needs and preferences were accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, staff attitudes and behaviors were directed towards assisting the residents in maintaining independence, dignity and well-being to the extent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#8 and #9) of three residents reviewed out of 11 sample residents for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide consistent showers for dependent Residents #8 and #9; and, -Provide regularly scheduled personal care to Resident #8. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care of Residents policy and procedure, revised in March 2018, was provided by the nurse quality manager (QM) on 9/26/23 at 5:43 p.m. It read in pertinent part Residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Residents would be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living(ADLs) do not diminish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for six out of seven resident hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a sanitary environment for resident hallways; -Clean up the dining room after an unknown resident urinated on the floor daily; and -Clean the air mattress cover for Resident #49. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Deep Clean policy, revised December 2010, was provided by the district director of clinical services (DDCS) #2 on 12/19/19 at 4:56 p.m. It documented in pertinent part .A successful preventive maintenance system is dependent on a routine schedule. Some preventive maintenance tasks are performed weekly while others are conducted monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually . The Complete Room policy, revised January 2000, was provided by the housekeeping supervisor (HKS) on 12/19/19 at 3:16 p.m. It documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming for four (#23, #13, #77 and #76) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23, Resident #13, Resident #77 and Resident #76 received baths/showers according to the residents bathing schedule. Cross-reference: F725 Sufficient staffing Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Routine Resident Care policy, revised September 2011, provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 12/19/19 at 9:19 a.m., revealed in part, Showers, tub baths, and/or shampoos are scheduled at least twice weekly and more often as needed. II. Resident #23 Resident status Resident #23, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the residents received the care and services they required as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff which considered the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, resident census and daily care and services required by the residents. Cross-reference: F677 activities of daily living services for dependent residents; F679 individualized activities; F686 pressure ulcer prevention and healing; F689 accident hazards; F698 dialysis care; and F690 incontinence care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The facility Staffing policy and procedure was requested on 12/19/19 at 5:05 p.m. The district director of clinical services (DDCS) #2 stated, We don't have a specific staffing policy. We follow what is on our facility assessment, based on the needs of the residents. II. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in one of two medication storage rooms and three of three medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Medication carts were kept clean, free from loose pills and debris; -Medications for different routes of administration were stored separately to prevent contamination; -Medication refrigerators were kept at acceptable storage temperatures and temperatures were monitored; -Expired medications were removed from the medication refrigerators in a timely manner; and -Medications were dated when opened in order for the staff to identify when the medications should be removed from service. Findings included: I. Facility policy and procedure The facility medication storage policy was requested from the director of nursing (DON) on 12/19/19 and not received during survey. The Medication Cart Use policy was received DON on 12/19/19 at 7:48 a.m. The policy documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (#95) of one out of 27 sample residents reviewed for respiratory care and one of one washer and dryer reviewed for routine cleaning/sanitization. Specifically the facility failed to ensure the proper cleaning and storage of Resident #95s continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment, and; to ensure the routine cleaning/sanitization, of a community washer and dryer, used by multiple residents on a daily basis, was completed after resident use. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A. The positive air pressure (PAP) equipment cleaning and care policy, provided by the respiratory company responsible for maintenance of PAP equipment, on 12/19/19 at 12:59 p.m., read in pertinent part: Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (#99 and #95) of two residents reviewed out of 40 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop a care plan for Resident #99 to prevent skin breakdown; and -Develop a care plan for Resident #95 related to the proper use and care of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine. Findings included: I. Facility policy and procedure The policy, dated 11/2017, titled Comprehensive Care Plan was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 12/18/19 at 11:00 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part care plans must include .interventions to prevent avoidable decline in function or functional level and attempt to manage risk factors. The care plan is reviewed on an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for two (#67 and #99) of 27 out of 44 sample residents were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to include: -Resident #67's vital sign requirements and shunt monitoring after dialysis; and -Resident #99's individualized activities. Cross-reference F698, failure to monitor Resident #67's access site for complications after dialysis; and F679, failure to provide individualized and meaningful activities for Resident #99 Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Comprehensive Care Plan policy, revised November 2017, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 12/18/19 at 11:00 a.m. The policy revealed the facility would develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs within seven days after completion of the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a meaningful program of activities for one (#99) of three residents reviewed for activities of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement individualized approaches for activities for resident #99, a cognitively impaired resident. Findings included: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities Program policy, dated February 2017 was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 12/19/19 at 7:48 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, activities are designed to provide residents with choices of meaningful activities independently or in a group setting. II. Resident Status Resident #99, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2019 computerized physician's orders (CPO) diagnoses included: dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and muscle weakness. The 12/2/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (#206 and #67) of three residents investigated for accident hazards out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #206 received recommended interventions resulting in falls and ensure Resident #67 received required neuro checks. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy, revised November 2017, provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 12/18/19 at 11:00 a.m. revealed in part, The nurse will discuss recommended interventions to reduce the potential for additional falls with the resident and/or resident's representative and document in the Care Plan and progress notes .After the at risk review meeting, the interdisciplinary (IDT) will perform the follow-up items assigned as indicated by the review .In the event a resident has a fall and it has been determined they hit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure one (#76) of one residents reviewed out of 40 residents sampled received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the bowel and bladder assessment for Resident #76, including toileting her every two hours and providing timely incontinent care. Findings included: Cross-reference F725 Failure to ensure sufficient staffing. I. Facility policy and procedure The Bowel and Bladder management policy dated July 2017, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 12/19/19 at 7:48 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, the goal of retraining for cognitively impaired residents was to increase periods of continence and reduce the potential for skin breakdown. The steps included monitoring for wetness every two hour, identify an elimination plan and initiate an individualized care plan. II. Resident status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences for one (#67) of one out of 40 sample selected residents. Specifically, the facility did not obtain physician orders to monitor the resident's condition or access site (shunt) for complications after dialysis treatments. Cross-reference F657: Failure to ensure care plans were updated. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hemodialysis, Care of Residents policy, revised August 2017, provided by the DON on 12/18/19 at 11:00 a.m., revealed the facility provided residents with safe, accurate and appropriate care, assessments and interventions consistent with the comprehensive care plan, the resident's goals and preferences. -Item #1: review and ensure orders upon admission were received for follow-up dialysis center appointments, shunt care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews,, the facility failed to ensure one (#51) of 40 sample residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet her needs per physician orders, and the resident's care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was served mechanical soft meals instead of regular texture meals. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diet policy, revised September 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/19/19 at 2:46 p.m. It documented in pertinent part This diet offers more advanced texture that may be used to transition to a regular diet. It consists of ground meats, with soft fruits and vegetables, and most bread products . II. Resident #51 status Resident #51, over the age of 90, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2019 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. The 10/13/19 minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$48,875 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $20,833 — penalty dated 2026-02-09
  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-07-08
  • $8,347 — penalty dated 2023-12-19
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $7,409 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHARLY BELLO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MAZE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MAHRT, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MYERS, KATIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MYERS, WALTERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SWAIN, HOLLYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SWAIN, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
CECILIA, COSMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
ROE, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
REDDY, VIKASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-43.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 3%Other / private 3%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$504per resident / day
operating cost
$15,323per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$351per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next