Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce
7300 Del Prado Circle South, Boca Raton, FL 33433 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (561) 392-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.5% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.4% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.0% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.82 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 395 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 277 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.0%CMS range 52.5–63.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.7%CMS range 6.2–11.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.9–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 149.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide blood pressure monitoring to meet the needs of a resident, and failed to assess the accuracy of medication administration, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The Findings included: A review of the facility's policy on Medication Administration, dated 01/27/2025, revealed medications are administered in accordance with the prescribers orders, and number 11 revealed vital signs are checked and verified for each resident prior to administering medications. 1) Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/08/24. A review of diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, Pneumonia with Shortness of Breath, Coronary Artery Disease, and Heart Failure. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] under Section C for Brief Interview of Mental Staus (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating good mental cognition. A review of orders dated 11/6/24 at 4:47 PM revealed Spironolactone oral tablet 25 MG, give 0.5 tablet by mouth one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate hydration and nutrition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) The findings included: During a record review of the Facility's policy, titled weight assessment and intervention , it was revealed under evaluation that the physician and the multidisciplinary team identify conditions or clinical situations and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss, or increasing the risk of weight loss based on the following examples, medication related adverse consequences, fluid and nutrient loss, and inadequate availability of food and fluids. Resident # 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/08/24. A review of diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, Pneumonia with Shortness of Breath, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C for Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating good mental cognition. Section N revealed Resident # 1 was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prepare foods in a manner consistent with standards for food safety. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour, on 12/02/24 at 9:28 AM, accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), it was noted that there was a leak at the filter from the steamer. The CDM stated that she was aware of the leak and Maintenance would be making repairs. 2). Upon approaching the entrance to the kitchen, on 12/03/24 at 9:35 AM, Staff R, Dietary Aide, answered and opened the door with gloved hand and then proceeded to rinse off her gloved left hand in a food preparation sink before handling ready to eat lettuce. Staff R was instructed to remove the gloves and perform hand hygiene. 3). During the follow up tour, on 12/05/24 at 6:34 AM, accompanied by the CDM, the following were noted: a. Staff R was observed stacking bowls on the food service line with her bare hands and fingers directly in the food contact surface of the bowls. Staff R was instructed to place the bowls in the dishwashing area to be washed and sanitized,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Menu Planning, in accordance with established national standards, for one week out of three menu cycles. This had the potential to affect all residents that consume their meals prepared by the facility. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Menu Planning dated 07/17/24, documented the following: The nutritional needs of individuals will be provided in accordance with the established national standards adjusted for age, gender, activity level, and disability. Through nourishing, well-balanced diets unless contraindicated by medical needs. All current menus will be written to provide an adequate amount for each meal to satisfy recommended daily allowances and written using an acceptable standard meal planning guide. Further review revealed that the menus at the facility were used based on a 2000-calorie/day diet with the following: Dairy/Milk: 2 to 3 cups equivalents per day. Fruits: 2 to 2.5 cups equivalents per day. Vegetables: 2.5 cups equivalents per day. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to 1) ensure access to call device for 2 of 32 sampled residents (Residents #46 and #94); 2) ensure function of air mattress for 2 of 31 sampled residents provided with air mattress (Residents #80 and #90); 3) provide access to wall light for 7 out of 26 sampled residents on 1 of 2 hallways on the [NAME] unit (Residents #94, #6, #68, #72, #80, #90, #53); 4) provide unobstructed access to bathroom and provide paper towels to 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #27); 5) provide clean linen in timely manner for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #86). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accommodation of Needs with a revised date of March 2021, included in part, the following: Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, adaptions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for behavior, (Residents #72 and Resident #28); failed to implement care plan interventions for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident #88 and Resident #111); and failed to implement interventions regarding psychotropic medications' side effects for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #111 and Resident #88) reviewed for Psychotropic Medications. The finding included: 1) A review of facility's policy titled, Care Plans Comprehensive, published on 09/25/2024, with document ID # 42867439 revealed the following: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. It revealed statement #2, under Policy Interpretation and Implementation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards including 1 out of 4 emergency carts containing sharps left unlocked and unattended, 1 out of 7 med carts with a broken sharp disposal container, and 2 out of 32 sampled residents with sharps at the bedside (Resident #88 and #108). The findings included: On 12/05/24 from 7:00 AM to 2:30 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were asked several times for a policy regarding sharps or accident/hazards the only policy provided was the facility policy titled, Sharps Disposal undated (printed dated of 12/05/24). Review of the facility's policy titled, Sharps Disposalundated (printed dated of 12/05/24) included in part the following: 3. During use, containers for contaminated sharps will be handled as follows: c) Designated individuals will be responsible for sealing and replacing containers when they are 75% to 80% full to protect employees from punctures and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drainage bag for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter is maintained in a manner to prevent infection and maintain dignity for 1 of 1sampled resident reviewed for a urinary catheter (Resident #46). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care Urinary with a revised date of August 2022 included in part the following: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Infection Control: 2. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity with a revision date of February 2021 included, in part, the following: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. 1) Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to monitor intake of nutritional supplements for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Nutrition (Residents #98 and Resident #53). The findings included: The facility's policy titled, Oral Supplements with a reference date of May, 2023, documented: Policy: The Department shall provide nutritional supplements to residents whose nutritional needs cannot be met through three meals per day, as ordered by the physician. Procedures: Nursing staff documents the resident's acceptance/rejection of supplements by amount. Records the amount of nourishment consumed by the resident in EMR (electronic medical record), and notifies the dietitian if the resident refuses the produce consistently. 1). Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving oxygen has a physician's order for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory affecting Resident #111 and failed to ensure respiratory supplies are cared for in a manner to prevent infection for 4 of 4 sampled residents for respiratory affecting Residents #17, # 111, #6 and #8. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Department (Respirator Therapy) -Prevention of Infection with no date (just a printed date of 12/05/24) included in part the following: Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators among residents and staff. Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration: 7. Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (&) days, or as needed. Infection Control Considerations Related to Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol: 7. Store the circuit in plastic bag,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to identify triggers for residents diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), for 2 of 2 residents sampled for mood and behavior, (Resident #72 and Resident #28). The finding include: 1.) Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care Proc with Document ID #98875710, published on 05/19/2023 revealed the following: Purpose: a. To guide Staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma-informed in accordance with professional standards of practice: and b. To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. General Guidelines: Triggers are highly individualized. Some common triggers may include: a. experiencing a lack of privacy or confinement in a crowded or small space. b. exposure to loud noises. c. certain sights such as objects; and or d. sounds, smells, and physical touch Resident Screening included the following: 1. Perform universal screening of residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled substance medication reconciliations were accurate for 6 of 12 sampled residents reviewed during the controlled substance record review (Residents #10, #51, #73, #88, #345, and #346). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, dated November 2022, included the following: Policy Statement: The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications (listed as Schedule II-V of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976). Dispensing and Reconciling Controlled Substances: 1.Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up. 2.The system of reconciling the receipt, dispensing and disposition of controlled substances includes the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below 5 percent; a total of 32 opportunities were observed with 4 medication errors identified which yield a medication error rate of 12.50 percent, affecting 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #63 and Resident #32. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2019, included the following: Policy Statement: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 4.Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 1) Record review for Resident #63 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Acute Leukemia of Unspecified Cell Type in Remission, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Section C of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to secure medications at bedside for 3 out of 34 sampled residents; (Residents #49, # 72, 115 ) and failed to secure 1 of 7 med carts; failed to secure medication left on top of 1 of 7 med carts; and failed to properly dispose of medication(s) during 2 out of 5 medication observations. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage with a published date of 05/19/23 included in part the following: The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications with a Published date of 05/19/23 included in part the following: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. 1. As part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that meets residents' preferences, allergies and intolerances for 6 of 6 sampled residents observed during dining observation (Resident's #122, #54, #39, #69, #44, and #46). The findings include: 1) Record review revealed that Resident #122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side and Non-traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicates slight cognitive impairment. In an interview conducted on 12/02/2024 at 10:45 AM Resident #122 stated that breakfast was okay, but it would be great if only she could really get what is on her meal ticket. For example, this morning she didn't get the grits that were on the meal ticket. In a second interview conducted on 12/02/2024 at 1:30 PM Resident #122…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide special eating equipment (adaptive devices) who need them when consuming meals and snacks for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for adaptive equipment, affecting Resident #46. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Adaptive Equipment Policy and Procedure with no dated (just the printed date of 12/05/24 included in part the following: Adaptive equipment refers to any device or tool that assists residents in performing activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, or other functional tasks. This policy aims to ensure that residents receive appropriate adaptive equipment and that staff members are trained in its proper use. 3. Equipment Acquisition and Inspection a. The facility should maintain a designated inventor of commonly used adaptive equipment. b. Upon receipt of newly ordered equipment, it should be inspected for any damage, defects, or missing parts. c. Any concerns or issues with the equipment should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F755, Pharmacy services, procedures, pharmacist, records; and F810, assistive devices, eating equipment, utensils. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect all 146 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited F755 and F810 during the Recertification survey with an exit date of 08/24/23. During an interview with the facility's Administrator on 12/5/24 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator was apprised that these 2 deficiencies will be cited again on this current survey. The Administrator stated she will be working to remedy this issue.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow Standard Infection Control procedures while performing perineal care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 28); failed to safely dispose of contaminated lancets used for glucose monitoring; and failed to maintain personal drink on a medication cart, in a manner to prevent contamination. The findings included: 1) A review of facility's policy (with no date) titled,Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revealed the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Page one of the policy, with letter c for Indications for Hand Hygiene, explained that hand hygiene is indicated after contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces; and letter g, explaining hand hygiene is indicated immediately after glove removal. Review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care : Level II, revealed the purposes of perineal care procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment to the residents as evidenced by allowing a visitor to enter the facility at 6:14 AM, without properly identifying the visitor. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Visitation revised on 08/2022 provided by the Administrator documented .the facility provides 24-hour access to individuals visiting .some visitation may be subject to reasonable clinical and safety restrictions that protect the health, safety, security and/or rights of the facility's residents such as: keeping the facility locked or secured at night with a system in place . On 06/25/24 at 6:14 AM, the surveyor arrived at the facility's main entrance, rang the doorbell and the automatic door opened. The surveyor walked up to the reception desk and completed the registration/sign-in using the facility's Advanced Registration machine at the reception desk. Observation revealed no staff member at the reception desk and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident for wound care (Resident #3). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care revised on 10/2010 documented .use disposable cloth (paper towel is adequate) to establish a clean field on resident's overbed table, place all items to be used during the procedure on the clean field .put on exam glove, loosen tape and remove dressing, pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle, wash and dry hands thoroughly, put on gloves .use no-touch technique .pour liquid solutions directly on gauze sponges .apply treatment as indicated .dress wound .be certain all clean items are on clean field .use clean field saturated with alcohol to wipe overbed table . take only the disposable supplies that are necessary for the treatment in the room . Review of Resident #3's clinical record documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide toileting/incontinence care to 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3), reviewed for toileting / incontinent care and failed to follow the physician orders regarding blood glucose results for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2). The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #1's clinical record documented an admission to the facility on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cerebral Atherosclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypothyroidism, Dementia, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Anxiety. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating that the resident had severe cognition impairment. The assessment documented under Functional Status that the resident was totally dependent on the staff for the activities of the daily living including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment in resident rooms and common areas, as well as failed to maintain laundry equipment in a repair. The findings included: 1) On 08/21/23 at 9:30 AM, an observation was conducted inside the first-floor soiled utility room where the laundry shoot is located, it was noted that the ceiling vent was covered with dust, debris, and moldlike substance, there were stains on the ceiling, corner of wall had plaster and paint missing, the covering behind the wire shelf was pulling away from the wall, the wall behind the covered garbage container was dirty, and the sink was dirty, the laundry shoot was rusted and dirty (Photographic Evidence Obtained). 2) On 08/21/23 at 9:40 AM, an observation was conducted of the drainage behind the washing machines which had a buildup of debris on the sides that was approximately 2 inches thick (Photographic Evidence Obtained). 3) On 08/21/23 at 9:44 AM, an observation was conducted in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for potentially 141 of the 145 facility residents that included; elimination of potential use of dented cans of food, maintenance of refrigeration units, maintenance of exhaust hoods, proper cleaning and maintenance of food preparation equipment, proper labeling and dating of opened food packages, and maintaining regulatory chemical levels in the 3-compartment sink. The findings included: During the initial observation tour of the main kitchen on 08/21/23 at 8:45 AM, and accompanied with the Food Service Director (FSD) and Administrator, the following were noted: (a) The door gaskets of Reach-in refrigerator #1 (Traulsen) were noted to have a build-up of a black mold substance and the front of the unit was full of condensation. It was discussed with the FSD that the gaskets were old and door was not shutting tightly resulting the condensation issues. Photographic Evidence Obtained. (b) The exhaust hood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to assure that staff handle, store, process, and transport laundry to prevent the spread of infection and failed to implement a surveillance plan to accurately identify, track, and report a Covid outbreak infection. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Laundry and Bedding, Soiled with a published date of 05/18/23 included: Soiled laundry/bedding shall be handled, transported, and processed according to best practices for infection prevention and control. Under Transport 6. Clean linen is protected from dust and soiling during transport and storage to ensure cleanliness. Under Section Laundry Processing 3. When using fans in laundry processing areas, the ventilation does not flow from soiled processing areas to clean laundry areas. 8. If laundry chutes are used, they are designed and maintained so as to minimize dispersion of aerosols from contaminated laundry (e.g., no loose items in the chute and bags are closed before tossing into the chute). Review of the facility's policy titled, FL Covid-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review; the facility failed to administer a psychotropic medication ordered upon admission for 1of 2 sampled residents reviewed for admission orders (Resident #299). The findings included: The facility's policy titled, Physician Services published 10/20/2022 revealed the The medical care of each resident is supervised by a licensed physician. Supervising the medical care of residents includes prescribing medications and therapy. Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 4:00 PM, per admission evaluation. He had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 12, per a social service evaluation dated 08/20/23. This indicated the resident is mildly impaired in his cognition. Medical diagnoses included Anemia, Dysphagia due to Throat Cancer, Anxiety, and Pneumonitis. On 08/21/23 at 11:55 AM, Resident #299 was interviewed and stated he was upset and anxious because he did not get his Xanax the past couple of nights. A review of the physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the order and facility protocol for enteral feeding for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #50). The findings included: Review of the facility for enteral feeding documented in part, the following: 1) Staff caring for residents with feeding tubes are trained on how to recognize and report complications associated with the insertion and or use of a feeding tube, such as: e) Esophageal swelling, strictures, fistulas; and f) clogging of the tube. On 08/21/23 at 12:15 PM, it was observed that Resident #50 was lying in bed. The tube feeding meal for Resident #50 was attached to the pole, but the pump was off. According to the writing on the bag, the feeding started on 08/20/23, no time indicated. There were 600 ml out of 1000 ml left to be infused. Photographic Evidence Obtained. On 08/21/23 at approximately 1:41 PM, meals were observed on Resident #50's bedside table, placed before the resident while she sat on the bed. Resident #50 was not feeding herself. Soon after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medications to meet the needs for 1 of 13 sampled residents reviewed during medication reconciliation of controlled substances (Resident #349); and failed to provide medications to meet the needs for 1 of 7 sampled residents observed for medication administration (Resident #297). The findings included: Record review for Resident #349 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission date of 03/15/23 with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Other Skin Complications, Recurrent Depressive Disorders, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #349 dated 08/18/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #349 revealed an order dated 03/31/23 for Alprazolam 0.25 mg given 1 tab by mouth two times a day for anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide special drinking equipment while consuming meals for 3 (Resident #30, #92, and #94) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the lunch meal on 08/21/23 at 12:15 PM, it was noted that the meal tray card of Resident #30 documented to provide 2 Handled Cup With Lid for tray beverages. Observation of the lunch meal tray noted that only 1 adaptive drinking cup was sent for the 3 beverages (Cranberry Juice (2) and Water) on the meal tray. The surveyor brought the issues to the attention of the Charge Nurse who stated the adaptive cups lessen spillage during independent drinking and called the dietary department for additional adaptive cups. Observation of the breakfast meal on 08/22/23 at 9:30 AM noted that the meal tray included a carton of milk, however an adaptive 2-handled cup with lid was not included on the meal tray. It was noted that Resident #30 was required to drink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide ceiling suspended curtains, to provide total visual privacy for 2 of 145 residents. The findings included: 1) Record review for Resident #7 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses included: End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #7 dated 07/01/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Stats score of 13 indicating a cognitive response. During an observation conducted on 08/21/23 at 11:10 AM Resident #7 was not in her semi-private room and there was no privacy curtain for Resident #7. During an observation conducted on 08/22/23 at 10:15 AM of Resident #7 was lying in her bed in her semi-private room with no privacy curtain for the resident. During an observation conducted on 08/23/23 at 9:40 AM of Resident #7's semi-private room and there continued to be no privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that include, proper storage of foods to prevent contamination, maintenance of ceiling air-conditioning vents to prevent contamination, maintain floor cleanliness, proper cleaning of ice machine filters to prevent contamination, and ensure sanitation buckets contain required levels of chemical sanitizing agents. The findings include: 1) During the initial kitchen observation conducted on 04/18/22 at 9 AM, accompanied with the Kitchen Supervisor, the following were noted: (a) Observation of the walk-in kitchen noted that there was a large pan of raw chicken (30 pounds) in a large commercial mixing bowl ,that was located on the second shelf on a food storage rack. Further observation noted that there was a pan of individual juice portions (20) and individual yogurt portions (20). It was discussed with the supervisor that there was a potential that spillage from the raw chicken could contaminate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide drinking cups with cartons of milk for the breakfast meal on 04/19/22, for 32 residents on the [NAME] Unit. The findings included: Review of the approved breakfast menu for 04/19/22 documented that 8 ounces of milk was to be served. Review of the Production Count for the breakfast meal dated 04/19/22 documented that 98 residents received whole milk, 24 residents received skim milk, 4 residents received 2% milk, and 3 residents received lactaid milk. During an observation of the breakfast meal on 04/19/22 at 8:56 AM, it was noted that 32 residents on the [NAME] Unit who received a carton of milk with their meal did not receive a drinking cup. In an interview conducted on 04/20/22 at 7:43 AM, the Dietary Supervisor stated that most residents receive milk cartons with their breakfast meals. When asked why the milk cartons were not served with drinking cups, the Dietary Supervisor stated that most of the drinking cups were used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior that included the Central Supply Rooms (2), [NAME] Unit, [NAME] Unit , and Windsor Unit. The findings included: 1) During observation conducted on 04/18/22 at 2 PM of the central Supply Rooms (2) , accompanied by the Central Supply Supervisor, the following concerns were noted: room [ROOM NUMBER]: (a) The air-conditioning vent located on the ceiling in the middle of the room was noted to have the entire exterior and surrounding area covered in a black mold type substance. It was discussed with the supervisor that the vent was blowing the suspected mold onto nursing supplies located in the room. The supervisor stated she was aware of the condition of the vent but had not reported it to maintenance. (b) The entire floor area of the supply room was covered with dirt, dust, trash, and areas of black mold type matter. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility's environment on the [NAME] Unit (first floor) which houses 40 residents, was not free of accident hazards. The findings included: During there environment tour of the [NAME] Unit located on the first floor on 04/20/22 at 2 PM, conducted with the Director of Maintenance and Director of Housekeeping, the following were noted: 1) Noted large areas (5) of cut up rolled up floor carpeting around North side of nurses station. Further observation noted the rolled carpeting to be protruded out and was a tripping hazard to resident and staff. The Director agreed with the surveyor's observation. 2) Observation of Community Shower #1 noted new floor tiles installed. Further observation noted that 4 floor tiles around the floor drain were raised and protruding sharp edges. It was discussed with the Mangers that the tiles were a hazard to residents feet and staff when utilizing the shower stall. The Managers agreed with the surveyors observation. 3)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the approved menu was not followed for 6 residents (including Resident #26) receiving physician ordered pureed diets and 8 residents (including Resident #141) receiving physician ordered Mechanically Altered Ground Diet. The findings included: During follow-up visits to the kitchen to observe the food tray line on 04/19/22, 04/20/22, and review of the approved facility menu, the following were noted: (a) Observation of the breakfast tray line on 04/19/22 at 7:30 AM noted that 2 Turkey Sausage Links were being served as a standard sized portion for Regular, No Added Salt, and Low Concentrated Sweets Diets. At the request of the surveyor, the standard portion of the Sausage Links were weighed utilizing the facility's portion scale. It was noted that 2 Sausage Links were weighed at 1 ounce. A review of the approved breakfast menu for 04/19/22 documented that 2 ounces of Sausage Links to be served, as a standard portion size. Interview conducted with the Kitchen Supervisor at the time of the observation noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for telephone communications for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for privacy (Resident #12). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, dated 04/11/22, documented the following: The facility will strive to protect the resident's privacy regarding his or her written and telephone communications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Telephones, Resident Use Of, dated 04/11/22, documented the following: Designated telephones are available to residents to make and receive private telephone calls. The telephones at the nursing stations should ordinarily be reserved for staff use, unless no other alternative is available. Residents should use telephones at the nursing stations for as brief a period as possible. Telephones will be in areas that offer privacy and accommodate the hearing impaired and wheelchair bound residents. Review of the record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure that 1 (Resident #192) of 12 sampled residents ability to eat did not diminish. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal on 04/18/22 at 12:30 PM, the [NAME] Unit, it was noted that the lunch meal was placed on the over-bed tray table in front of Resident #192, however the resident was not eating. Interview with Resident #192 at the time of the observation noted the resident to be very alert and orientated and stated that she is blind and requires extensive to total assist with meals. The resident further stated that she tells aides when delivering the meal that she needs help eating, but they never return. The surveyor inquired if she complained to Administration and stated I have been here 3 weeks without assistance and I am used to eating the foods cold. Resident #192 stated that she has total blindness in the left eye and blurred vision in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a midline intravenous (IV) catheter was assessed for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for IV catheters, Resident #104, as evidenced by no documentation Resident #104's midline IV catheter was being assessed or checked for patency since the insertion date. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Midline Dressing Changes states in part, 'Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened or soiled catheter site dressings. General Guidelines: Change midline dressing 24 hours after catheter insertion, every 5-7 days, or if it is wet, dirty, not intact, or compromised in any way.' Review of the facility policy titled Central Venous and Midline Catheter Flushing states in part, 'Purpose: The purpose of this procedure are to maintain patency of midline and central venous catheters. Flushing Protocol: Flush catheters at regular intervals to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure splint devices were applied for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for Position/Mobility, Resident #104, as evidenced by failing to apply a left hand splint, left elbow splint and bilateral lower extremity boots for Resident #104 to prevent further contractures. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Restorative Nursing Services states in part, 'Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g. physical, occupational or speech therapist). Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care.' On 04/18/22 at 10:00 AM, 12:20 PM and 2:40 PM, Resident #104 was observed in her room in bed in a hospital gown. Resident #104's left hand was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to address significant weight loss in a timely manner for 3 of 12 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #12, Resident #25 and Resident #125). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 04/11/22, documented the following: Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If they weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. The dietitian will respond within 24 hours of receipt of written notification. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant, greater than 5% is severe; 3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant, greater than 7.5% is severe; 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant, greater than 10% is severe. 1) Review of the record documented that Resident #12 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the medication error rate was 7 percent. 2 medication errors were identified while observing a total of 26 opportunities, affecting Resident #26. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications published 04/11/2022 documented Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Review of Resident #26's clinical record documented an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia without behavioral disturbances, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Polyosteoarthritis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was done with an assessment reference date of 02/07/22. Section C of the assessment included a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9, which indicated the resident has moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #26's physician orders for April 2022 documented Artificial Tears Solution 5-6 milligram (mg)/milliliter Instill 1 drop in both eyes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to secure and obtain an order for self-administration of prescription oral rinse for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for self-administration of medications (Resident #84) and failed to secure medications in 2 of 2 nursing stations on the second floor. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated 04/11/22, documented the following: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The staff and practitioner will document their findings and the choices of residents who are able to self-administer medications. Self-administered medications must be stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents. 1) Review of the record documented that Resident #84 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and policy review; the facility failed to provide a resident with snacks to consume at dialysis for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #20) reviewed for dialysis. The findings included: The facility's policy titled Dialysis created on 2/2019 states Dietician will be made aware to provide meals/snacks as needed. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with recent readmission post hospitalization on 04/01/22. Medical diagnoses include end stage renal disease, anemia, type 2 diabetes and dependence on renal dialysis. He is on a Renal diet, regular texture, thin liquids consistency. The Medicare 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment with an assessment reference date 04/04/22 reveals a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicative the resident has severe cognitive impairment. The chart review revealed the resident goes to the Dialysis Center for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday approximately 5:00 AM with a chair time of 5:40 AM and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents receiving a Puree Diet, Resident #64, did not have access to food items not recommended for residents on a Puree Diet. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Therapeutic Diets states in part, 'Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the Attending Physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care in accordance with his or her goals and preferences A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner or dietician as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet.' Review of the facility definition of Puree Diet states 'The puree diet is for residents who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing. Foods allowed on this plan must be pureed, pudding like food that is in the form of an easy to swallow bolus with moist, pudding-like consistency without particles. Foods to Avoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLORIDA VENTURES B LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/17/2017 |
| EINHORN, NEAL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| FRIEDMAN, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| CAMPBELL, VERNANDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2025 |
| PARIKH, NAVAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMS-CHAMBERS, MARVIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/19/2025 |
| MD FRIEDMAN FAMILY 2017 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2024 |
| NEAL EINHORN FAMILY 2017 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2024 |
| SCHWARTZ, ELIEZER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| ZUCKER, YOSSIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105506. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.