The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 162 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 192.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.84 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.94 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. This was evident in one (1) (Unit 4) of 5 units observed. Specifically, the unit hallway, dayroom, and pantry room were observed with dark, brown-colored stains on the floor. The floor edges were observed with old, yellow-colored grease-like stains. A heavy strong old odor was also noted. The findings include: The facility was not able to present a policy related to the deficiency. On 08/07/2025 at 10:15 AM, during observation in Unit 4, the floors in the hallway in front of the nursing station and in front of the elevator, entrance by the dayroom, and the pantry were observed with dirt, dark stains, and with old, yellow-colored grease-like stain. A heavy strong odor was also noted. There were 26 residents in the day room at the time of this observation. On 08/07/2025 10:59 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse #3. They stated that the hallway, at the front of the elevator, and towards the day room have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 08/07/2025 to 08/14/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents' Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised after each assessment. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #8) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the Comprehensive Care Plans for Anticoagulation Therapy and Psychoactive Drug Use were reviewed and revised after the last quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was completed.The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 05/25/2025 stated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Incident 673700) the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #203) of two (2) residents reviewed for wandering and elopement out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 09/01/2024, Resident #203, who was severely impaired in cognition and had a wander alert device (a device that alerts staff when the resident is exiting the building), left the building undetected through the front door at 11:25 AM. Resident #203 was located by the facility staff approximately 300 feet from the facility and returned to the facility at 1:11 PM. The findings include:The policy and procedure titled Wandering and Elopement Risk with a last revised date of 05/20/2025 defined elopement as an occurrence when a resident leaves the premises or safe area without authorization and/or any necessary supervision to do so. The policy documented if a resident is identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (incident 673540), the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for one (1) out of five (5) residents (Resident #3) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 07/10/2024 at 9:00 PM, Resident #3's family reported to Registered Nurse Supervisor #2 that on 07/10/2024 at around 5:45 PM, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 09/10/2023 to 09/15/2023, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during review of the kitchen facility task. Specifically, (1) staff were not wearing hair nets in the kitchen. (2) A staff member's personal bag was on the kitchen counter next to the meat slicer. (3) Food in the freezer was stored too close to the ceiling. (4) Food stored in the refrigerator was not covered and labeled. The findings are: Facility policy and procedure titled Date for Marking Food Safety dated 7/18/2023 documents the facility adheres to date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control safety for food. Facility policy and procedure titled Emergency Food Supply dated 7/18/2023 documents it is the policy of this facility to establish procedures to ensure that food is available for residents, staff, and volunteers in the case of an emergency. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey on 09/10/2023 to 09/15/2023, it was determined that for one (Resident #55) of seven residents, the facility did not ensure Resident # 55's property was safeguarded and free from loss or theft. Specifically, personal items which included 4-night gowns went missing. The facility did not investigate or complete a timely and thorough investigation of the missing property. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Resident Property documents the facility will maintain a safe environment for patient/resident property and will properly investigate all allegations of lost/missing or misappropriated property. The findings are: On 09/11/23 at 11:58 AM Resident #55 reported 4-night gowns missing for over a period of 3 weeks. Resident #55 stated that a room change was done and there were laundry bins in the bathroom that had the 4-night gowns, and the clothing went to the laundry and has not seen the clothing since. Resident #55 reported to the CNA the clothing was missing and was told they will check on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that nursing staff implemented the interventions of a resident's comprehensive care plan (CCP). This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer (Resident #25) out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, Resident #25 did not have heel booties applied at all times as per the CCP for Pressure Ulcer prevention. The findings are: The Facility's Policy and procedure titled Skin and Wound Management issued on 2/07/2017 documented that it is the policy of the facility to maintain intact skin and to prevent avoidable pressure ulcer injury. Some of the limited measures that will be utilized to prevent skin breakdown include turning positioning, pressure relieving mattress, incontinence management, skin barrier, heel booties, heel offloading, wheelchair cushion and other positioning device, adequate nutrition and resident/family education. Resident #25 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey of 9/10/23 - 9/15/23, the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive care plans (CCPs)were reviewed and/or revised after each assessment and as needed to reflect changes in the resident needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #60) of 8 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and 1 (Resident #46) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary medications, out of an investigative sample of 38 residents. Specifically, (1) the Diabetes Mellitus CCP for Resident #46 was not reviewed and revised quarterly and after an episode of hypoglycemia. (2) the Dysfunctional coping or interaction CCP for Resident #60 was not reviewed and/or revised quarterly. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan, effective date, and last review date of 5/15/23, documents each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/15/2023, the facility did not ensure residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities. This was evident for Resident #52 and #103 reviewed for Communication. Specifically, 1) Resident #52 did not have a follow up consultation with the Ophthalmologist as recommended, and 2) Resident #103 did not have a recommended consultation with the Optometrist for glasses. The findings are: The policy titled Physician Services documented the attending physician is responsible for supervising follow-up visits. 1) Resident #52 had diagnoses of coronary artery disease and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #52 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision, and wore corrective lenses. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) related to sensory deficit initiated 1/5/2023 and last reviewed 7/26/2023 documented Resident #52 will use glasses as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer (Resident #25). Specifically, during multiple observations, Resident #25 was observed without heel booties in place as ordered. The findings are: The Facility's Policy and procedure titled Skin and Wound Management issued on 2/07/2017 documented that it is the policy of the facility to maintain intact skin and to prevent avoidable pressure ulcer injury. Some of the limited measures that will be utilized to prevent skin breakdown include turning positioning, pressure relieving mattress, incontinence management, skin barrier, heel booties, heel offloading, wheelchair cushion and other positioning device, adequate nutrition and resident/family education. Resident #25 was admitted with diagnoses which include Dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY