The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 454 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 280 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 203 beds and averages 186.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated Survey #2637567, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #1 did not provide Resident #1 with staff assistance for meeting their activities of daily living needs during the evening shift on 10/06/2025, despite documenting such care was given. Subsequently, Resident #1 was last seen on 10/06/2025 at 9:12 PM in their room sitting fully clothed in their wheelchair and at 11:51 PM, Resident #1 was found in their room lying face down on the floor between the bed and wheelchair, with their head under the bed and their oxygen nasal cannula dislodged. Resident #1 was short of breath, non-verbal and had lacerations (cuts) on their forehead and neck. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased at 12:20 AM at the facility. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 03/08/2026 to 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure action as a fiduciary (trustee) of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the residents' personal funds deposited with the facility for one (1) (Resident #29) of two (2) residents reviewed for personal funds. Specifically, the facility restricted Resident #29 to receiving money on two (2) days a week and in an amount lower than the resident wanted.The findings are:Resident #29's diagnoses included surgical amputation of the left leg below the knee and partial right foot, congestive heart failure, and diabetes.The 01/14/2026 quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #29 had intact cognition.The facility policy, Resident Funds, last approved on 10/02/2025, documents that residents have access to their personal funds 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week.A 11/04/2025 memorandum from the resident's family member documented they would have no problem if the resident requested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (2) of eight (8) residents (Resident #126 and Resident #170) reviewed for the environment. Specifically, 1) Resident #126 was observed sitting in a wheelchair that was visibly soiled on the frame, cushion, and protective gauze; 2) Resident #170 was observed sitting in a wheelchair that was visibly soiled on the frame, body, and back of wheelchair. The findings included:The facility policy Wheelchair Cleaning Process, dated 10/03/2025, documented that all resident wheelchairs, cushions, and adaptive equipment are routinely cleaned in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control infection control guidelines to maintain a clean and sanitary environment and to prevent the transmission of infectious agents. Any equipment that is soiled will be added to the daily cleaning schedule. 1) Resident #126 had diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary assistance with eating for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #128) reviewed for nutrition and one (1) of 19 residents (Resident #140) reviewed for dining. Specifically, 1) Resident #128, who had significant weight loss and required maximal assistance with eating was observed receiving only set up assistance during meals; 2) Resident #140, who had a history of weight loss and required moderate assistance with eating was observed receiving mostly only set up assistance during meals. The findings included:The Facility Activities of Daily Living Policy last reviewed 10/03/2025 documented that appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #72) reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #72 had a history of falls and multiple safety interventions in place including keeping the environment well lit and clutter free. Floor mats were determined to be a tripping hazard and not included as an intervention for their safety; however, floor mats were observed in the room and staff reported that they were in use. The findings included:The Facility Managing Fall Risk and Prevention policy dated 06/24/2025 documented based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Resident #72 had diagnoses that included dementia, obstructive uropathy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure care consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan was provided for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #69) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #69 was administered oxygen at a liter flow greater than the current physician's order.The findings included:An undated, untitled facility policy documented guidelines for safe oxygen administration included review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration.Resident #69's diagnoses included dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] document Resident #69 had severe cognitive impairment, was short of breath when lying flat and received oxygen therapy. A physician order dated 03/03/2026 documented two (2) liters of oxygen via nasal cannula continuously every shift for chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure a resident received behavioral health services to attain their highest practicable well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #9) of one (1) resident reviewed for Behavioral/Emotional Status. Specifically, Resident #9 had a physician order for a psychiatry and psychology consultation after making an inappropriate sexual comment to another resident on [DATE]. Resident #9 was not evaluated by a psychiatrist or psychologist in accordance with the physician order. The findings included:A facility policy titled Behavior Health Services, revised 04/2024 documented the facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care.Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during a recertification survey from 3/08/2026 to 3/13/2026, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, six (6) food items were not properly identified in the kitchen refrigerators, freezers, and food storage areas and one dietary cook was not wearing a beard net while actively preparing food.The findings include:The policy titled Food Receiving and Storage last approved 09/12/2025, documented that refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored.On 3/08/2025 at 11:28 a.m., the initial inspection of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor, and the following were observed:One (1) tray of apple and pineapple cups not labeled with identification in the snack refrigerator.One (1) tray of cottage cheese cups, three (3) apples in cups and two (2) oranges in cups were not labeled with identification in the snack refrigerator.One (1) tray of pudding cups not labeled with identification in the portable tray rack.Three (3) peanut butter cups not labeled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during abbreviated survey #2637567, the facility did not ensure accurate documentation of medical records in accordance with accepted professional standard and practice were maintained for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for activity of daily living care. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #1 documented in the electronic medical record activity of daily living cares on [DATE] that had not been provided. Additionally, although Resident #1 expired on [DATE] at 12:20 AM and their remains were removed from the facility at approximately 3:00 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #10 documented hourly rounding was completed for Resident #1 on [DATE] from 11:45 PM-6:45 AM.The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including but not limited to Pneumonia, Coronary Artery Disease, and Heart Failure.The [DATE] Five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review completed during a complaint investigation (NY00374056) the facility did not maintain infection prevention and control practices in accordance with guidelines for enhanced barrier precautions for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. Specifically, Resident #2 was on enhanced barrier precautions, as indicated by signage posted on the wall outside of their room. On three separate occasions, staff provided hands-on care without wearing gowns.Record review:The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 1/28/25 documented that enhanced barrier precautions are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms to residents. The policy listed examples of high contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use one of which was device care or use, as well as dressing a resident.Resident #2's quarterly review minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] documented active diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews conducted during abbreviated survey (NY00331188) the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised in a timely manner for 1(Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #2's Behavior Care Plan initiated 4/22/22 documented that they were two assists with cares due to history of accusatory behaviors and the care plan was not reviewed and revised to populate these interventions onto Certified Nurse Aides tasks/documentation. Certified Nurse Aide #2 was unaware of Resident #2's plan of requiring two person assists and they provided care to Resident #2 without another staff member present. Resident #2 accused Certified Nurse Aide #2 of alleged abuse after cares were provided. The Findings are: The Facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last revised on 3/2022 documented that the comprehensive person-centered care plan describes the services that are furnished to attain or maintain the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY