The Riverside

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 730 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 403 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 520 beds and averages 492.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/20/2024, the facility did not ensure that, to the extent practicable, the resident or resident representative participated in the development, review, and revision of the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, the care planning meeting was not held at the time-of-day Resident #55 was available to participate. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for Care Plans out of 39 residents. (Resident #55) The Finds include: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plans, with the last revised date of 10/01/2024, documented that the Resident/Representative is encouraged to participate in development and amendment the comprehensive care plans. The Social Worker/Designee will notify the resident and the responsible party of the care plan conference date and time. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident/representative. Resident #55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/20/2024, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan was developed and implemented to meet the resident's goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Specifically, 1) Resident # 100 who had diagnosis of Dementia had no care plan in to address a Dementia diagnosis. 2) Resident # 186 receiving an Anti-depressant and Opioids had no care plan in place. This was evident of two of 5 residents investigated for Unnecessary Medications out of a sample of 39 residents (Resident #100 and Resident #186). The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Planning, with the last revised date of 10/1/2024, documented that the facility will develop a comprehensive, person-centered care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/20/2024, the facility did not ensure an ongoing activities program was provided to meet the resident's interest and support the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was evident in 2 (Resident #247 and 384) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #247 and 384, who reside in the Memory Care (Dementia) unit, were not provided with activities that met the residents' preferences and cognitive abilities. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Activity, with the last revised date of 10/22/2024, documented that group activities are available. The activities calendar is completed and maintained to inform residents, families, and staff of the activity opportunities available. The November 2024 Activities calendar for the 11th floor was posted in the dining room. Activities from 11/13/2024 through 11/20/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #392 Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00338415) Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/20/2024, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse. This was evident in 1 (Resident #392) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 04/06/2024 at approximately 06:30 AM, a video recording device in Resident #392's room recorded Certified Nursing Assistant #12 grabbing and hitting Resident #392 on the hands and arms. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Reporting with a revision date of 09/26/2024 documented that the facility will not condone resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, resident representatives, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, friends, or other individuals. The Incident Report dated 04/07/2024 documented that on 04/07/2024 at approximately 11:45 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 2/14/23 to 2/22/23, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent foodborne illness. This was observed during Kitchen observation. Specifically, (1) the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) did not perform hand hygiene while feeding lunch to Resident #436, 2) expired pureed banana was observed in the emergency food supply, and 3) sandwiches from the tray line was not held within acceptable parameters, at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F), to prevent foodborne illness. The findings are: The facility policy titled Food Storage last reviewed 7/22/2022 documented old stock is always used first (first in - first out method). Date markings to indicate the date or day by which ready to eat. The facility policy titled Food Temperatures last reviewed 9/2/2022 documented all cold foods items will be transported and delivered to maintain temperatures at or below 41 F. The facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free of pests and rodents. This was evident for 3 (Units 2, 6, and 10) of 12 residential units. Specifically, there were multiple observations of mice and insects throughout resident rooms and common areas on Units 2, 6, and 10. The finding is: The facility policy titled Pest Control last revised 09/09/2022 documented the facility will maintain an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Treatment of the facility for pest and insect control is performed on a weekly basis with more frequent treatment as needed. The Exterminator will review the Pest Control Log (PCL) on a weekly basis or as needed and indicate in the log the location of application, the pesticide used, and date of visit. On 02/14/2023 at 12:32 PM and 02/16/2023 at 10:57 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] on Unit 2 was observed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Deficiency Text Not Available

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00299038) Survey from 02/14/2023 to 02/22/2023, the facility did not ensure alleged violations involving abuse were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made. This was evident for 1 (Resident #293) of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, an allegation of abuse involving Resident #293 was not reported to the NYSDOH within 2 hours of the allegation being made. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Reporting last reviewed 08/28/2022 documented if resident abuse or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to the state law. Immediately is defined as (a) within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or (b) within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification and Complaint (NY00308262) Survey from 02/14/2023 to 02/22/2023, the facility did not ensure a Baseline Care Plan (BCP) was developed, implemented, and provided to the resident and resident representative (RR). This was evident for 2 (Resident #612 and #761) of 40 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the RR of Resident #612 was not provided with a copy of the BCP upon completion, and 2) the BCP for Resident #761 did not include the resident's anticoagulant therapy. The findings are: The facility policy titled BCP last reviewed 10/13/2022 documented the facility will develop and implement a BCP that must include physician orders. 1.) Resident #612 had diagnoses of dementia and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #612 was severely cognitively impaired and the family or significant other participated in the assessment. The BCP initiated for Resident #612 on 02/03/2023 was completed and signed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00306631) Survey from 2/14/23 to 2/22/23, the facility did not ensure a resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised to reflect a change in the resident's status. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 18 and #184) of 40 sampled residents. Specifically, the CCP related to abuse prevention was not reviewed and revised for Resident #18 and #184 following their involvement in a resident-to-resident altercation. The findings are: The facility policy titled CCPs effective 01/29/13 and reviewed 10/12/22 documented that care plan conferences will be scheduled by the care plan team as needed to address changes in the resident condition. The facility Investigation Summary dated 12/9/22 documented interventions to address the resident-to-resident altercation involving Resident #18 and #184 included keeping the residents at least arm's length distance apart during activities involving musical instruments and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $20.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY