Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 212 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 155.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.42 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record reviews and interviews, the facility's staff failed to supervise and implement adequate measures to prevent the elopement for one (Resident #1) out of three residents sampled. The facility's system failure, lack of adequate supervision and a failure in ensuring an adequate alert monitoring system were in place enabled Resident #1 who had risk factors that include visual impairment and seizure disorder, exited the facility undetected on 09/01/2024 shortly after lunchtime. Resident #1 who had displayed and voiced his intent to leave the day prior ambulated 3.2 miles from the facility in areas that has high traffic volume, intersections and cross streets; these factors increased the likelihood of an adverse outcomes, serious injury and serious harm or death. The facility's staff were not aware of Resident #1's absence until the resident's sister called the facility and reported a convenience store owner had called and said her brother was at the store. The Registered Nurse (Staff J)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility's staff failed to answer incoming calls after 8:00 PM. Six documented calls to the facility were not answered by the staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 159 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.Observational tour on 01/20/2026 at 3:35 PM, revealed the East Wing nursing station had three desk phones and one portable phone. The [NAME] Wing nursing station had three desk phones and one portable phone. The North Wing nursing station also had three desk phones and one portable phone on the counter. There were three nurses at each nursing station engaged in various tasks.On 12/29/2025 the surveyors made multiple attempts to contact the facility by phone at different times as follows:9:34 PM - The phone rang 10 times, but no one answered 9:42 PM - The phone rang 15 times, but no one answered.9:48 PM - The phone rang 15 times, but no one answered.10:01 PM - The phone rang 15 times, but no one answered.10:16 PM - The phone rang 17 times, but no one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, clean homelike environment with a comfortable interior free of disrepair for 11 out of 32 resident rooms on the East Unit. (Photographic evidence available). There were 156 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 06/02/25 starting at 06:30 AM during the initial tour and resident screenings on the facility's East Unit observation revealed: The chest of drawers in room numbers 4, 6, 9 ,11, 15,17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 and 26 noted with chipped paint, grime (dirt ingrained on the surface) and black marks covering the top. The floor in room# 25 bed A was littered with paper all around the bed. Observation in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom revealed the toilet tissue/paper dispenser was broken. Interview on 06/04/25 at 10:30 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) East Unit Manager when showed the photos of the surveyor findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #131) out of eight residents sampled was treated with respect and dignity during dining, as evidenced by Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant observed standing while feeding Resident #131. This deficient practice has the potential to affect any residents residing in the facility requiring assistance from staff. The findings included: Observation on 06/02/25 at 12:42 PM, revealed Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in Resident #131's room standing while feeding Resident #131. On 06/02/25 at 12:44 PM, the surveyor asked Staff B why he was standing while feeding Resident #131. Staff B revealed he prefers to stand and because he takes his time feeding the resident and makes sure the resident is safe. On 06/02/25 at 01:40 PM the Staff Educator (Staff C) acknowledged the identified concern related to dignity during dining and proper feeding practices. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Dignity dated 11/14/24 states: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment that is free from potential hazards for one (Resident #54) out of eight vulnerable residents sampled. As evidenced by the electrical cord for an Intravenous (IV) infusion pump attached to a pole at the right side of the resident's bed observed extended across bed connected to an electrical outlet on the left side of the resident's bed. There were 156 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation on 06/03/25 at 08:40 AM, Resident #54 was asleep in bed, IV site present on the resident's left arm dated 05/29/25. There was an IV pole with infusion pump attached at the right side of the resident's bed; it was revealed that the IV pump's electrical cord hung from the IV pole on the right side of the resident's bed was positioned under the resident, extending across the bed to the left side of the bed was connected to an electrical socket on the wall behind the bed's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and treatment ointments were stored in accordance with facility policy. As evidenced by ointments and medication were found in the residents' rooms unsecured. There were 156 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 06/02/25 starting at 06:30 AM during the initial facility tour and resident screenings on the East Unit of the facility, the following were observed: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed Zinc Oxide ointment on the dresser in both rooms. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a half full 0.9% Sodium Chloride syringe on top of the dresser in the room. (Photographic evidence available) Interview on 06/04/25 at 10:48 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) East Unit Manager when showed the photos of the findings in the residents' rooms, stated: The ointments and creams should be stored in the residents' personal drawers and the Sodium Chloride solutions must be stored on the medication cart or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)/ Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to demonstrate effective action plans were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F641- Accuracy of assessment and F761- Label/Store drugs and biologicals. Facility's failure to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Facility's failure to store medications appropriately. There were 156 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 01/19/ 2024, F641- Accuracy of assessment was cited for inaccurate coding of MDS section B for Corrective lenses. F761- Label/Store drugs and biologicals was cited due to facility's failure to ensure medications were securely stored. F867-Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement was cited due to the QAPI/QAA committee's failure to monitor previous problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations record review and interviews, the facility's staff failed to ensure accuracy of controlled medication and failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored and disposed in accordance with professional standards; as evidenced by three out of eight medication carts were observed unattended and unlocked, inaccurate narcotic accounting, medications observed in drawers at the north wing nurses' station and medications incorrectly disposed. On 12/02/2024 at 4:55 AM during the initial tour, the west wing's medication cart # 3 assigned to Staff N, RN was observed unlocked and unattended. On 12/02/2024 at 5:04 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) observed tossing medications in the trash can attached to the medication cart. Staff A revealed the resident refused the medications, so she had to toss them. Staff A was asked if that was the process to discard medications. Staff A denied tossing the medications in the trash. The medications were retrieved from the trash and Staff A placed them in the sharps container. Staff A did not respond when was asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility's staff failed to implement infection prevention control policies and procedures as evidenced by failure to handle soiled linen and garbage to ensure a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Observation on 12/02/2024 at 4:55 AM, several clear plastic bags containing trash and soiled linen were observed on the floor in the facility's hallways and resident's doorways. On 12/02/2024 at 4:57 AM during an observation on the east wing Certified Nursing Staff (CNA) Staff H was observed placing soiled linen in a bin and then returned few minutes later to remove clean linen from the clean linen cart that was noted beside two bins (a gray bin and a white bin). On 12/02/2024 at 7:11 AM, Staff H, CNA explained; the soiled linens and garbage should be placed in plastic bags and then in bins in the biohazard room. One bin is for the soiled linen and one for garbage. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary condition as evidence by: 1) failure to ensure reach-in freezer and the reach-in refrigerators in the kitchen contained thermometers on the inside and 2) failure to ensure the resident's foods were labeled and dated. 3)The refrigerators were not working properly, and the refrigerator contained opened milk cartons in the snack/nourishment refrigerators on the resident's units. This has the potential to affect 163 out of 171 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey and potential to affect 55 out of 56 residents who eat orally residing on the East Wing. The findings included: 1) Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 1/16/24 at 8:34 AM with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Kitchen Supervisor revealed the following: 1) Reach-in freezer temperature outside was -4 degrees F and for the inside temperature, there was no thermometer noted. The reach-in freezer contained ice cream and desserts; 2) Reach-in Refrigerator #1 temperature outside was 40…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator in the East Wing Nourishment Pantry used to store resident's food was working properly. This has the potential to affect 55 out of 56 residents who eat orally residing in the East Wing at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation of the East Wing Nourishment Pantry on 1/17/24 at 10:40 AM revealed the refrigerator was 60 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and the freezer was 54 degrees F. Photographic evidence submitted. Observation and interview with Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN) North and East Unit Manager on 1/17/24 at 10:42 AM of the East Wing Nourishment Pantry Refrigerator. She stated, The refrigerator temperature should be 41 degrees and the freezer should be 0 degrees F. Record review of the East Wing Nourishment Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Log for January 2024 documented the following: 1/17/24 7:00 AM Refrigerator temperature was 39 degrees F and the Freezer temperature was -2 degrees F. Interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 1/17/24 at 11:00 AM. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL