No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Nashville Center For Rehabilitation And Healing Ll

832 Wedgewood Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 142 certified beds · (615) 806-8800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (615) 806-8800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 2018Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
700 Craighead St · (615) 321-4566 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2223 8th Ave S · (615) 514-5722 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
808 Bradford Ave · (615) 298-4039 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1910 8th Ave S · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%6.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.1%13.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.3%31.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.0%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.3%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%16.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine37.2%79.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%22.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.671.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.971.561.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 213 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 243 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.9%CMS range 44.9–61.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 7.0–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.7–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.401.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
72.8%
Total nursing turnover
68.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 136.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-03-16)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2019-04-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary equipment for 1 of 3 ice machines and 2 of 2 stove drip pans. The facility also failed to properly store refrigerated foods in 1 of 2 walk-in coolers. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitization, revealed, .The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner .Ice chests and coolers used to store and transport ice are cleaned regularly . Review of the facility's policy, Ice Machines and Ice Storage Chests, revealed, .Ice machines and ice storage/distribution containers will be used and maintained to assure a safe and sanitary supply of ice .Ice-making machines, ices storage chests/containers, and ice can all become contaminated by .unsanitary manipulation . Observation and interview in the kitchen on 3/13/2023 at 10:15 AM, revealed the small and large drip pans with large amounts of black, brown debris covering the width of pans. The Dietary Aide #2 confirmed the drip tray should be cleaned after every use. Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to determine and perform a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #16) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility MDS/Care Plan Coordinator Job Description revealed, .MDS/Care Plan Coordinator is an experienced health care provider who ensures an accurate assessment and up-to-date care plan for all residents . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual revealed, .A significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status .will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions . Review of medical record revealed Resident #16 admitted to facility on 8/16/2020 with diagnoses which included Metabolic Encephalopathy, Hepatic Failure, and Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver. Review of Resident #16's Nursing Progress Notes revealed, .12/14/2022 resident noted with IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to create and provide a baseline care plan for 5 of 40 (Residents #59, #62, #100, #216, and #358) sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans Baseline, dated 11/30/2022, revealed, .A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission .A comprehensive care plan may be used in place of the baseline care plan providing the comprehensive care plan is developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission and meets the requirements of a comprehensive assessment .The resident and/or record . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Altered Mental Status, End Stage Renal Disease, and Cerebral Infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have quarterly care plan conference meetings with the resident or resident's representative for 11 out of 40 sampled residents (Residents #19, #30, #32, #49, #57, #60, #69, #76, #77, #81, and #82). The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revealed, .The interdisciplinary team [IDT], in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven [7] days of the completion of the required MDS [Minimum Data Set] [Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status], and no more than 21 days after admission .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change .The IDT team reviews and updates the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #32) reviewed for potential discharge. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, revealed, .A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident .This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 admitted to facility on 9/21/2020 with diagnoses which included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Displaced Comminuted Fracture of Right Arm. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #32 had a focus of resident expects to return to his previous living arrangement out in the community with an intervention to make arrangements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #77's) enteral tube was labeled and dated. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Enteral Feedings-Safety dated 3/08/2023 revealed, .2. on the formula label document initial, date and time the formula was hung, and initial that the label was checked against the order . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acute Disseminated Encephalitis and Encephalomyelitis Unspecified, and Encephalopathy Unspecified. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #77 receives nutrition by enteral tube and no Brief Inteview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was documented. Review of the current Physician's Orders for Resident #77 revealed orders for the enteral tube. Observations in Resident #77's room on 3/14/2023 at 8:22 AM and 9:50 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to apply hubs to the end of an IJ (Internal Jugular Vein) Catheter external limbs and failed to apply a hub on the end of an IV (Intravenous) tubing and date the tubing for 1 of 17 (Resident #216) residents. The findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Administration Set/Tubing Changes revealed .Label tubing with date, time and initials. If a facility requires, label may include the date and time that tubing was initated and when tubing should be discontinued or changed .Place a sterile end cap on the primary and/or secondary intermittent tubing when it is disconnected from the catheter . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Abscess of Bursa Left shoulder. Review of the Physician orders dated 3/8/2023 revealed .Vancomycin HCl Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 750 mg (milligrams) intravenously every 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and interview the facility failed to obtain State approval to open a Long Term Care (LTC) Hemodialysis Unit. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Long-Term Care Facility Renal Dialysis Coordination Agreement, dated 11/17/2020 revealed, .agreement where by the three [3] hours per treatment, and is administered up to five [5] treatments per week, pursuant to a physician's order .to residents of the LTC facility .on the premises of the LTC facility through the Dialysis Facility's home program, including the provision of training services in the delivery of Renal Dialysis to Residents . Review of the facility email from Tennessee Department of Health dated 6/6/2022 revealed, .[Named Facility] this office received your plan (s) for the above referenced project for review and approval. This [We Concur] letter and stamp will serve as full documentation for approval and installation of nine station dialysis den as reflected on revised the attached .sketch. This letter, however, does not relieve the owner, architects, sprinkler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to have a declination form for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations for 1 of 5 (Resident #8) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Influenza Vaccine revealed .All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the Influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations aganist influenza .A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the informed consent for Influenza vaccine and placed in the resident's medical record . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine revealed .All residents are offered Pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing Pneumonia/Pneumococcal infections .Residents/representatives have the right to refuse vaccination. If, refused, appropriate information is documented in the resident's medical record indicating the date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to have a declination form for the COVID-19 vaccination for 1 of 5 (Resident #8) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COVID 19, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of the Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 7 indicating severe cognitve impairment. Review of the undated COVID-19 Informed Consent Form revealed the form was not signed for acceptance or declination of the immunization. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 9:10 AM, the Infection Preventionist confirmed the consent form for the COVID-19 vaccination was supposed to be filled out if they refuse.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to have 1 of 40 operable call lights. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Answering the Call Light revealed .Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times . Observation and interview in Resident #62's room on 3/14/2023 at 9:22 AM, Resident #62 stated his call light was not working. Continued interview revealed I push the hell out of the button before it will come on. Observation and interview in Resident #62's room on 3/14/2023 at 9:35 AM, confirmed the Unit Manger pressed the call light and it was not working. The Unit Manager reset the call light button and the light lit up. Then she turned it off and pressed the button again and it did not work. During an interview on 3/14/2023 at 9:45 AM, the Director of Maintenance confirmed the call light cord was worn and had been dropped which caused it not to work.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0920 — isolated
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to have adequate dining space for 3 of 3 rooms in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, TN COVID Communal Dining and Activity Programs, and Resident Outings revised 11/2022, revealed .Communal actvities and dining do not have to be paused during an outbreak, unless directed by the state or local health department . Observation in the 600 hall activties/dining room on 3/14/2023 at 7:55 AM revealed the door had a key pad which required a code before entering. There was a big TV (television) and various tables and chairs used for actvities. Contnued observation revealed games and activties stacked up aganist the wall on the shelves. Observation in the dining area for the 100, 200, 300, and 400 halls (Rehabilitation unit) on 3/15/2023 at 9:39 AM revealed one table with three chairs and two couches. Observation in the dining room on the 500 hall on 3/15/2023 at 9:55 AM revealed many items from different parts of the building stored in the room. The room had no space for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise and update a care plan for 1 resident (#46) of 52 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plans-Comprehensive revised September 2010 revealed .Assessments of residents are ongoing care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change .The care planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans .When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition .When the desired outcome is not met .When the resident has been re-admitted to the facility from a hospital stay .At least quarterly . Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cognitive Communication Deficit and Dysphagia. Medical record review of Resident #46's Physician Order Summary Report dated 4/12/19 revealed .Consistent CHO [carbohydrate] diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to provide total assistance with meals for 1 resident (#46) of 52 residents reviewed. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cognitive Communication Deficit and Dysphagia. Medical record review of Resident #46's Physician Order Summary Report dated 4/12/19 revealed .Consistent CHO [carbohydrate] diet mechanically altered ground texture, Nectar consistency .4/16/19 ST [Speech Therapy] downgrade patient to total feed for all meals to maximize PO [by mouth] intake and decrease weight loss . Medical record review of Resident #46's 5 day Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident required extensive assistance with eating. Medical record review of Resident #46's Speech Therapy Encounter Note dated 4/16/19 revealed .Patient downgraded to total feed with staff educated on swallow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for 1 resident (#18) of 52 residents reviewed related to the Physician Orders and Physician Orders For Life Sustaining Treatment/Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POLST/POST) form not matching. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Advance Directives-MOLST (Medical Orders For Life Sustaining Treatment) / POLST (Physician Orders For Life Sustaining Treatment), undated, revealed .Residents of the facility will have their advance directives [including MOLST and POLST] honored .These will be reviewed upon admission and periodically throughout their stay .MOLST/POLST is a medical order form that tells others the resident's/patient's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment .It is designed to communicate the individual's wishes about a range of life-sustaining and resuscitative measures .It is a portable, valid and immediately actionable medical order consistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the dish machine manufacturer's recommendation, review of the manual washing protocol, and interview, the facility dietary department failed to operate the dish machine per the manufacturer's recommended temperature range, failed to sanitize items appropriately in the 3 compartment sink, and failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner in 1 of 6 observations in the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the posted dish machine manufacturer's recommendation revealed the minimum wash and final rinse temperature was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Review of the manual washing protocol revealed the items in the sanitizer solution were to be in contact with the sanitizer solution for 30 seconds. Observation on 4/10/18 at 10:12 AM in the dietary department revealed the dish machine was in operation. Further observation revealed 2 racks of dirty dome lids were processed and the wash and rinse temperatures were 110 degrees F for both. The surveyor stated aloud to the 2 dietary employees and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) present the temperatures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-04-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain completed advanced directives for 8 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #90, Resident #91, Resident #98, Resident #99, Resident #590, Resident #28, Resident #83 and Resident #86) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Advance Directive-MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment)/POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) undated revealed .Once the MOSLT/POLST form is completed, it must be signed by the resident or if the resident lacks capacity, the resident representatives AND the attending physician . Medical record review revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Nondisplaced Fracture of Right Acetabulum, Fracture of Right Ischium, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Fracture of Shaft of Left Humerus, Fracture of Left Shoulder Girdle, Wedge Compression Fracture of T9-T10 Vertebra, Moderate Laceration of Left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-04-11 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Medical record review revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Nondisplaced Fracture of Right Acetabulum, Fracture of Right Ischium, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Fracture of Shaft of Left Humerus, Fracture of Left Shoulder Girdle, Wedge Compression Fracture of T9-T10 Vertebra, Moderate Laceration of Left Kidney, Fracture of Lower End of Right Ulna, Fracture of Right Patella, Fracture of Right Radial Styloid Process, Moderate Laceration of Spleen, and Multiple Fractures of Ribs, Right Side. Medical record review of Resident #90's Order Summary Report dated 4/1/18-4/30/18 revealed wound care treatment orders to his left shoulder, right hip surgical site and right flank. Continued review revealed the resident received scheduled and PRN (as needed) pain medications. Medical record review of Resident #90's Baseline Care Plan Review dated 4/5/18 revealed it did not address the immediate care and services of the resident for wound treatments or pain management. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-04-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications had a 14 day limitation or a prescriber documentation with medical rationale for continuation for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #60, Resident #21, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #82) and failed to conduct behavior monitoring for 2 of 12residents (Resident #82, Resident #86) reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring revised 3/2015 revealed .When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include: Monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences. The nursing staff and the physician will monitor for side effects and complications related to psychoactive medications; for example, lethargy, abnormal involuntary movements, anorexia, or recurrent falling . Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-04-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility dietary department staff failed to ensure the resident meals were served per the menu, failed to obtain food preferences, and failed to honor resident food preferences for 6 of 86 residents receiving meals. Findings include: Observation on 4/9/18 at 12:20 PM of the dietary department resident mid-day meal tray line service revealed mashed potatoes were served to pureed diets. Further observation revealed no .mashed sweet potatoes . were available as the pureed diet indicated for residents disliking mashed (white) potatoes. Observation on 4/9/18 at 1:13 PM revealed Resident #73 with the lunch tray. Further observation of the tray card ticket revealed the diet was Pureed NAS (no added salt) and the food items included pureed ham, mashed sweet potatoes, pureed peas, pureed soup in a mug, and pureed fruit in a bowl. Observation of the food served revealed pureed ham, mashed (white) potatoes, pureed peas, and gelatin in a bowl. Further observation revealed no mashed sweet potatoes, soup in a mug or pureed fruit in a bowl had been provided.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-04-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to honor and/or obtain food preferences for 6 of 86 sampled residents (Resident #25, Resident #73, Resident #91, Resident #98, Resident #342) receiving a meal. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hospice, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Giant Cell Arthritis, Pain Thoracic Spine, Pain, Osteoporosis, Depression, and Anxiety. Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 hearing and vision were adequate and she could make herself understood and understood others. Further review revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident was independent with eating after set-up. Further review revealed the resident had no episodes of delirium, mood, psychosis or behaviors during the review period. Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within the 2-hour time frame as required to the State Agency for 2 residents of 7 sampled residents (Resident #82 and Resident #83) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Reporting revised 11/23/17 revealed, .All alleged suspected violations .are required to be promptly reported to appropriate state agencies .as required by law .The facility must report abuse .immediately but not later than 2 hours . Medical record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Altered Mental Status, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of a facility investigation involving Resident #82 with an occurrence date of 2/8/18 at 5:40 PM revealed an allegation of abuse. Continued review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 44 sampled residents (Resident #60) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension and Malignant Neoplasm of the Bladder. Medical record review of the Physician's Order Summary dated 3/18/18, revealed an order for Humalog (insulin) inject as per sliding scale every 6 hours. Continued review revealed an order for Oxycodone (opioid pain medication) 15 mg (milligrams) every 6 hours as needed for pain. Medical record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 3/2/18 - 3/8/18 (7 day lookback period) revealed Resident #60 received insulin 2 of 7 days and an opioid 7 of 7 days of the lookback period. Medical record review of the 30 day MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was assessed for receiving insulin 7 of 7 days and an opioid for 0 of 7 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide wound care treatments as ordered for 1of 44 sampled residents (Resident #98) reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Encounter for Surgical Aftercare following Surgery on the Genitourinary System, Infection Following a Procedure, Malignant Neoplasm of Vulva, Acute Kidney Failure, Cellulitis of Groin, Hypertension, Need for Assistance with Personal Care and Difficulty in Walking. Medical record review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 4/9/18 revealed Resident #98 scored a 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Observation and interview with Resident #98 on 4/9/18 at 11:57 AM in her room revealed the resident had a large dressing across her lower abdomen. Continued observation revealed the bottom of her gown was darker in color than the top of her gown and the resident reported it was wet. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-04-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer the enteral feeding per the Physician's Order for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #28, Resident #36) reviewed with enteral feedings. Findings include: Review of the Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy dated 3/2015, revealed .Preparation .Verify .there is a physician's order .Steps in the Procedure .Check the label on the enteral formula against the physician order .Initiate Feeding .On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order . Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Enteral Feeding. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 3/19/18. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the Enteral Feeding. Medical record review of the Physician's Order dated 4/4/18 revealed the enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer pain medication in a timely manner as ordered for 3 of 44 sampled residents (Resident #90, Resident #342, and Resident #99) reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy Pain-Clinical Protocol revised March 2015 revealed .Strategies that may be employed when establishing the medication regimen include: Combining long-acting medications with PRNs[as needed] for breakthrough pain. Implementing the medication regimen as ordered, carefully documenting the results of the interventions. Administer pain medication as ordered. The staff will reassess the individual's pain and related consequences at regular intervals; at least each shift for acute pain or significant changes in levels of chronic pain at least weekly in stable chronic pain . Medical record review revealed Resident #342 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fracture, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a drug regimen review for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #60) reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Drug Regimen Review undated, revealed .The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive Drug Regimen Review (DRR) at least monthly on all residents of the facility . Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension and Malignant Neoplasm of the Bladder. Review of the document Medication Regimen Review dated 3/14/18 revealed .The following residents' medication regimens were reviewed on the dates specified . The document did not include the name of Resident #60 indicating a drug regimen review was not performed for March 2018. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/11/18 at 2:29 PM in the conference room confirmed the facility failed to conduct a drug regimen review in March 2018…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store a medication in 1 of 3 medication rooms, failed to maintain current refrigeration temperature logs in 2 of 4 medication rooms, and failed to ensure 1 of 1 treatment cart and 1 of 7 medication carts were locked when not in use by staff. Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medication, revised April 2007, revealed Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, room, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly . Review of facility policy Labeling of Medication Containers revised April 2007, revealed .Labels for each floor's stock medications shall include all necessary information . Observation on 4/9/18 at 10:15 AM of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 2 of 44 sampled residents (Resident #28 and Resident #36) reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Gastrostomy (Enteral/Tube Feeding). Medical record review of the Physician's Order dated 3/1/18 for enteral feeding of Jevity 1.5 at 70 cc/hour (cubic centimeter per hour) continuous for 22 hours. This order was discontinued on 4/4/18. Medical record review of the Physician's Order dated 4/4/18 revealed the enteral feeding of .Jevity 1.5 .at 86 ml/hr [milliliters per hour] x [for] 18 hrs/d [hours per day] . Review of the March 2018 through 4/4/18 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed no documentation of the tube feeding administration. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/12/18 at 9:29 AM in conference room confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-04-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility dietary department failed to maintain the slicer in a safe operating condition. Findings include: Observation on 4/10/18 at 10:25 AM in the dietary department with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) present revealed a plastic covered slicer. The cover was removed and the blade was not flush with the slicer table. Further observation revealed the thickness adjustment knob would not rotate to adjust the blade. Interview with the CDM on 4/10/18 at 10:25 AM in the dietary department confirmed the facility failed to maintain the slicer in a safe operating condition.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 1 of 5Quality Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCLebanon, TN 2 of 5Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterYonkers, NY 2 of 5The Grove At Valhalla Rehab And Nursing CenterValhalla, NY 2 of 5The Paramount At Somers Rehab And Nursing CenterSomers, NY 2 of 5Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation aPort Jefferson, NY 3 of 5Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLCMiami, FL 3 of 5Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Glengariff Health Care CenterGlen Cove, NY 3 of 5Green Hills Center For Rehabilitation And HealingNashville, TN 3 of 5Pearl At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterPeekskill, NY 3 of 5The Grand Pavilion For Rehab & Nursing at RockvillRockville Centre, NY 3 of 5The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing CenterSuffern, NY 3 of 5Trevecca Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 4 of 5Chatham Hills Subacute Care CenterChatham, NJ 4 of 5Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMadison, TN 4 of 5Gallatin Center For Rehabilitation And HealingGallatin, TN 4 of 5Legacy At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 4 of 5Manchester Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LManchester, TN 4 of 5St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterSt James, NY 5 of 5Cortlandt HealthcareCortlandt Manor, NY 5 of 5Lebanon Center For Rehabilitation And Healing, LLCLebanon, TN 5 of 5Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills PondSt James, NY 5 of 5Palmetto Subacute Care CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSayville, NY 5 of 5The Chateau At Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Enclave At Rye Rehab And Nursing CtrPort Chester, NY 5 of 5The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center atNesconset, NY 5 of 5The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The RiversideNew York, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NASHVILLE VENTURES TN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2017
YZH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 07/09/2025
EINHORN, NEALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2017
FRIEDMAN, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2017
PEDEN, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2018
TURNER, DEMARCUSIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
WILLIAMS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2015
MD FRIEDMAN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2025
NEAL EINHORN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.8M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 41%Medicare 31%Other / private 29%

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$462per resident / day
operating cost
$14,033per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$430per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445512. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next