No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Legacy At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce

6363 Verde Trail, Boca Raton, FL 33433 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (561) 483-9282 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (561) 483-9282 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
21346 St Andrews Blvd · (561) 674-3104 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
21324 Saint Andrews Blvd · (561) 368-5759 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
21230 St Andrews Blvd · (561) 544-2422 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
21689 Toledo Rd · (561) 392-8172

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.4%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.3%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.0%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.9%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.4%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.192.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 397 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 302 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.5%CMS range 48.3–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 9.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.8–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
35.2%
Total nursing turnover
47.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 173.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedures, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 2 of 2 sampled residents observed with Foley Catheters, (Resident #31 and Resident #122). The findings included: Review of the un-dated facility policy titled, Dignity provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented in the Policy Statement: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times.12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: a. helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered.1). Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to a resident who was unable to carry out with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #110) reviewed for ADLs.The findings included: Review of Resident #110's clinical record documents an admission to the facility on [DATE] with no readmissions. Resident's diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction with Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Encephalopathy, Urinary Tract Infection and Unsteadiness on Feet. Review of Resident #110's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare 5 days assessment dated [DATE] documents that the resident needs substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, had frequent incontinence and was dependent on the staff for incontinence care. Resident BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score was 3 of 15 indicating the resident has severe cognition impairment. Review of Resident #110's care plan initiated on 06/17/25 titled (resident's name.requires assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1). Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify the need for skin care and treatment for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident #14); and 2). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 4 sampled residents observed during medication administration (Resident #137 and Resident #59). The findings included:1). Review of Resident #14's clinical records documented an admission date to the facility on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Trichotillomania, Dementia, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, Cerebral Infarction and Speech and Language Deficits following other Cerebrovascular Disease.Review of Resident #14's care plan titled Skin.{resident's name} has a potential risk for skin breakdown due to picking at her skin.Diagnoses Alzheimer's and Trichotillomania. care plan was initiated on 12/19/2019. Interventions included: Assess skin during nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedures, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed for Foley catheters (Resident #31). The findings included: Review of the un-dated facility policy titled Catheter Care Urinary provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented in the Policy Statement. The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections.General Guidelines.4. Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a securement device to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. Infection Control.2. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor.Maintaining Unobstructed Urine Flow: 1. Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks. 1). Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Review of the un-dated facility policy titled Oxygen Administration provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented in the Policy Statement.The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration.Documentation: After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time that the procedure was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual who performed the procedure. 3. The rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale. 4. The frequency and duration of the treatment. 5. The reason for p.r.n. (as needed) administration. 6. All assessment data obtained before, during, and after the procedure. 7. How the resident tolerated the procedure. Record review revealed Resident #196 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow doctors' orders for 2 of 4 sampled residents during the Medication Administration Observation. (Resident #59, Resident #137). There were 2 errors for 27 opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 7.41%.The findings included: The facility's policy titled Administering Medications, published 01/27/2025, has a section with the subtitle of Policy Interpretation and Implementation. Under the subtitle there is a numbered list that describes the policy and the procedure for administering medications. Item number 4 states Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. On 08/05/25 at 9:50 AM, a Medication Administration observation was conducted with Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The medication administration was performed for Resident #137 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W on the B-Wing. Resident #137 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriate services to a resident who is incontinent of bladder, to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for incontinence (Resident # 1). The findings included:A record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, Encounter for Surgical Aftercare following surgery of the Circulatory System, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Vascular Disorders of the Intestine, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment under Section C of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating Resident #1 had good cognitive function. Section GG revealed Resident #1 had impairment on one side of the lower extremity, and was dependent on toileting hygiene, shower, bathing, and lower body dressing. Section N revealed Resident #1 was receiving diuretic (a medication that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment free of offensive odor in 1 of 3 units (Berkshire Unit). As evidenced by a foul urine like odor, noted during a tour of the facility. The findings included: On 07/02/24 at 9:32 AM, a tour to the facility's Berkshire Unit started. Observation revealed a strong offensive, urine like odor, down the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 210. On 07/02/24 at 10:18 AM, observation revealed Staff A, Housekeeper mopping room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor and bathroom. Observation revealed the foul urine like odor continued outside the room. On 07/02/24 at 10:24 AM, observation revealed a foul urine like odor inside room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 07/02/24 at 10:35 AM, the Surveyor attempted to interview Staff A, but she did not understand the questions asked. Staff A was asked to call her manager. On 07/02/24 at 10:39 AM, an interview was conducted with the Berkshire Unit Manager who stated that the housekeeper saw urine and noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to identify and treat resident's skin redness/rash for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3). As evidenced by a redness area observed on Resident #3's chest, right upper arm and left upper arm, with no documented treatment in place. The findings included: Review of Resident #3's clinical record documented an admission to the facility on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Ataxia (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movements), Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Kidney Disease and Left and Right Foot Pain. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the resident had no cognition impairment. The assessment documented under Functional Abilities and Goals that the resident needed supervision or touching assistance from the staff to complete the activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included: During the initial Food Service Observation Sanitation Tour conducted on 04/07/24 ay 8:40 AM, and subsequent tours conducted on 04/08/24 at 7 AM and 11:30 AM with the Foods Service Director, and 04/09/24 at 11:30 AM, accompanied with the Corporate Dietary Manager, the following were noted: 1) 04/07/24 (8:40 AM Tour): * Large uncovered cart full of uncovered soiled resident food trays located at the entrance to the dietary department. The uncovered soiled trays were from the prior dinner meal. * Two staff working in the food production area noted to have facial beards that were not covered from contaminating foods. Surveyor requested to don beard guards prior to continue working within the department. * During the temperature testing of the hot and cold foods it was noted that serving staff failed to have a supply of alcohol wipes to properly sanitize the digital food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior on the B Wing (1 of 33 rooms), C Wing (17 of 33 rooms) and D Wing (1 of 39 rooms). The findings included: During the initial resident/room screenings conducted on 04/07/24 from 9 AM-3 PM, and the Environment Tour conducted on 04/10/24 at 10 AM, accompanied with the facility's Assistant Administrator and Corporate Housekeeping Manager, the following were noted: B Wing: room [ROOM NUMBER] - Electric bed (A Bed) not working, staff not able position resident for assistance with feeding the lunch meal. C Wing: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Nurse call bell cord was wrapped around the bed frame (W Bed) and the resident was not able to reach the call button; bathroom ceiling tiles (2) noted to have large black mold areas (5 X 7); and the filter of the O-2 concentrator was dust laden. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Portable toilet commode seat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to: 1) ensure that residents medications were properly stored, as evidenced by over the counter medications being left in the resident's room for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #119, #474, #473, #475, and #476); 2) ensure that residents prescription medication were properly stored at the B-wing, as evidenced by medications being left in a medication cup in the resident's room (Resident #129) 3) ensure that resident's medication were stored properly, as evidenced by an opened bottle of Nitroglycerin tablets being left in a drawer at the C-wing nurses station. 4) ensure that it secured 2 of 3 wound care supply carts, located in the C and D wing. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage with no revision dated provided by the Director of Nursing documented The facility stores all medications .in a locked compartments .the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the approved menu for physician ordered Regular Diets for 133 residents ( including sampled Resident's #112, #162, #119), Mechanical Altered Chopped Diets for 24 residents (including sampled Residents #14, #17, #29, and 97), Mechanical Altered Ground Diets for 3 residents (including sampled Resident #116) , and Pureed Diets for 10 residents (including sampled Residents #7 and #92). The findings included: 1) During the review of the facility's approved menu for the lunch meal of 04/07/24 , the following were noted to be served: * Dinner Roll-Regular Diet * Chopped Dinner Roll-Mechanical Altered Chopped Diet * Pureed Dinner Roll-Mechanical Altered Ground Diet, and Pureed Diet < Observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 04/07/24 at 11:30 AM, noted the following: * Dinner Roll-not available, no dinner roll substitute served * Chopped Dinner Roll-not prepared , no substitute prepared * Pureed Dinner-not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 10 physician ordered pureed diets(including sampled Residents #7 and #92), 24 physician ordered Mechanically Altered Chopped Diet (including sampled Residents #14, #17, #29, #29, and #97), and 3 physician Mechanically Altered Ground Diet (including sampled Resident #116). The findings included: During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 04/07/24 at 10 AM, it was noted that foods were being prepared in the small food preparation room by the Lunch [NAME] (Staff B). Further observation noted a large food preparation located on top of the stove top. Further investigation noted that the pan contained approximately 40 pounds of green beans that were boiling and were fully cooked and were also noted to begin breaking apart from overcooking. It was also noted that the oven contained a full steam table sized pan of Baked Vegetarian Ziti, and full pan of 20 fully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food in a proper pureed form to meet the needs of 10 facility residents with physician ordered Pureed Diet which included Sampled Resident's #7 and #92. The findings included: Review of the facility's Approved Diet Manual- Care Rite Diet Manual for Health Care Communities - 2023- * Pureed Diet noted: Indicated for difficulty in chewing or swallowing food items. Food are pureed in a blender or food processor to leave a smooth (pudding like texture) without lumps of large chunks. Nothing that required chewing is allowed. Pureed foods should be of one consistent texture and upon testing, fall off a spoon as an intact spoonful, and hold it's shape on a plate. * Review of main kitchen posting of (Pureed Diet noted: < All foods must be: * Pureed * Homogenous * Cohesive * Pudding-like * Requires no chewing During the observation of the lunch meal in the Main Kitchen on 04/07/24 at 11:30 AM, hot foods located on the steam tables were viewed by the surveyor. Observation of the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed prevent verbal abuse towards a resident from a staff member for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #54). The findings included: Record review revealed the facility's policy titled, 'Identifying Types of Abuse' (no reference date documented on the policy) documented, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Abuse of any kind against residents is strictly prohibited. 2. Abuse prevention includes recognizing and understanding the definitions and types of abuse that can occur. 3. It is understood by the leadership in this facility that preventing abuse requires staff education, training and support, and a facility-wide culture of compassion and caring. 4. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. c. Abuse includes verbal abuse. 5. Abuse toward a resident can occur as: b. staff-to-resident abuse. Mental and Verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner for 1 out of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin discoloration (Resident #104). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy/Job description titled, Job description: Certified Nursing Assistant, undated, included the following: Job Summary: The purpose of this position is to assist the nurses in the providing of resident care primarily in the area of the daily living routine. Main Duties: H. Report any changes in resident's condition-e.g. eating habits, behavior, temperature, etc. to the charge nurse of the unit. M. Be responsible for well-being and nursing care of all residents assigned to his/her unit while on duty. P. Detect and report situations that have a high probability of causing accidents or injuries to residents and/or staff. During an observation on 04/10/24 at 8:40 AM of the Dining Room located at the C-Unit, the surveyor noted Resident #104 was yelling and crying out that her hands hurt. Further observation revealed her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide and identify the need for psychosocial assessments in a timely manner for 1 out of 1 sampled resident reviewed for disruptive yelling out behaviors (Resident #104). The facility also failed to follow Physician's orders to report blood sugar readings of 400 and above to the Physician for 1 out of 1 sampled resident reviewed for insulin (Resident #323). In addition, the facility failed to perform a skin assessment in a timely manner for 1 out of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin condition (Resident #71). The findings included: 1) Record review for Resident #104 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, and Depression. Review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6, which indicated that she had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1of 1 sampled residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #30). The findings included: Review of Resident #30's clinical record documented an admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included, in part, Atherosclerosis Heart Disease, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dysphagia, Atrial Fibrillation, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder, Anxiety, Heart Failure, Depression, Sacral PU (pressure ulcer) stage 4 and [NAME] Prostatic Hyperplasia. Resident #30's Bowel and Bladder Evaluation dated 04/09/24 documented, the resident was incontinent of urine. Review of Resident #30's physician order dated 02/02/24 documented, cleanse sacrum (wound) with normal saline solution (NSS) and apply Collagen Powder to wound bed then pack with Calcium Alginate every day shift for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it performed appropriate hand hygiene, care and cleanliness to avoid cross-contamination, per professional standards, during Perineal and Foley Catheter care for 1 of 1 sampled residents observed, (Resident #97). The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), titled, 'Perineal Care' revised February 2018, documented in the Policy Statement: Purpose: the purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition For a female resident: (2) Rinse perineum thoroughly in same direction, using fresh water and a clean washcloth. Review of the un-dated facility policy and procedure provided by the DON, titled, 'Infection Control' related to Perineal Care, revised February 2018, documented in the Policy Statement: Infection Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reimburse a resident's representative for monies spent on the resident from the resident's trust fund for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for personal funds (Resident #3). The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease and Dementia. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required total dependence of two-persons for activities of daily living. A phone interview was conducted with Resident #3's representative on 11/20/23 at 10:00 AM. The representative stated he provided the facility a copy of receipts for food delivered to Resident #3. The resident's representative stated he was denied because he was told the resident needed to keep money in his account for things needed such as a hair cut. Resident #3's representative further stated he had been reimbursed previously for food delivered to the resident. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards that include: failure to maintain refrigeration units, failure to ensure washing in the 3-compartment sink, failure to maintain and clean ceiling and light fixtures, and failure to clean and sanitize commercial food preparation equipment. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service sanitation tour conducted on 01/30/23 at 9 AM, accompanied with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS), the following were noted: (a) Observation of the walk-in freezer noted that thermometer gauge to be 40 degrees F and also noted that the entry/exit door was ajar and would not close tightly and noted a heavy, large build-up of ice around the entire door threshold area. The FSS stated that the door is new, however, it has not been able to shut for weeks. Further stated that the issues had been reported to maintenance but has not been addressed. The surveyor informed the FSS that the internal thermometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve residents in a manner to enhance or maintain the dignity of the residents during dining. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity published on 11/30/22 documented Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .provided with a dignified dining experience .staff are expected to treat cognitively impaired residents with dignity and sensitivity . 1). During an observation of lunch being served on to the residents in the dining room of the C-Wing (Rooms 300 to 332), on 01/30/23 12:48 PM, staff were observed removing the trays from the covered speed rack that was used to transport the meals from the kitchen to the units. Staff were noted to remove the tray from the speed rack and place the meal in front of the residents and remove the covers from the meal and the lids from the containers and open the cartons of various fluids. Once the staff had completed setting up the meals for the residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on and resolve grievances voiced by the Resident Council, with the potential to effect residents in the facility that prefer meals in the Dining Rooms(s) and the timing of the meals being served. The findings included: During an interview, on 01/30/23 at 11:59 AM, with Resident #13, when asked about dining, Resident #13 replied, We used to have dinner in the main dining room, but we don't anymore because there is not enough staff. I don't like eating dinner in my room. Lunch, we eat in the main dining room Monday through Friday. During a review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes and the Menu Committee Meeting minutes, on 02/01/23 at 12:15 PM, the following grievance was noted: 09/15/22: - Main Dining Room is now open to residents for lunch only. - Main Dining Room is requested to be open for [NAME] Hashana dinner - Main Dining Room is to be served first before the units receive lunch trays Action taken 09/19/22, The Main Dining room is being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the facility's laundry services in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings included: A tour of the laundry room was conducted on 02/02/23 at 11:00 AM with a fellow surveyor and Staff S, Laundry Aide and Staff T, Housekeeping Manager. The following areas of concern were observed, and photographic evidence was obtained: 1) In the dirty linen sorting area, it was observed that 2 of the 3 dirty laundry carts had interior build-up of dust, dirt, and debris; and the exteriors of the carts were worn, ripped, and rusty. This could potentially contaminate the soiled linens. 2) In the dirty linen sorting area, it was observed that 2 used isolation gowns were hanging on the wall on hooks, indicating the staff intended to re-use them. Staff T stated the staff members do re-use the isolation gowns. The surveyors explained that it is best practice for the staff members to wear new isolation gowns for each load of laundry to ensure they are not cross-contaminating loads. 3) In the dirty linen sorting area, it was observed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure expired supplements and medical/biologicals supplies were removed from 2 of 3 medications/supplements storage room reviewed (Cambridge Unit, [NAME] Unit, and the Biological Storage Room); 2) keep medications carts free from loose pills/tablets noted in the drawers for 2 of 4 medications carts reviewed; and 3) ensure that 1 of 3 treatment carts (Berkshire Unit) and 1 of 3 respiratory care carts were kept secure/locked. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications published on 11/30/22 documented .Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments .Drugs and Biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received .the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage .in a clean, safe and sanitary manner .outdated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed .unlocked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the approved menu was not followed for physician ordered Purred Diet, Chopped Diet, and Ground Diet which effected 8 of 8 sampled (Resident #10, #14, #70, #81, #87, #92, #98, and #213). The findings included: 1) During the review of the approved menu for the lunch of 01/30/23 noted the following to be served to residents with a physician ordered Pureed Diet and Ground Diet: * 3 ounces Pureed Fish * 4 ounces Pureed beets * Pureed Garlic Bread * Tomato Puree 3 ounces Ground Fish 4 ounces Ground Beets Observation of the tray line assembly of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 01/30/23 at 11:30 AM, noted the following: * Pureed Fish - unavailable and not prepared for the lunch meal * Pureed Beets - unavailable and not prepared for the lunch meal * Pureed Garlic Bread - unavailable and not prepared for the lunch meal * Tomato Puree (smooth consistency) - unavailable and not prepared got the lunch meal * Ground Fish - unavailable and not prepared for the lunch meal * Ground Beets - unavailable not prepared for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for physician ordered Pureed Diets which included 13 facility residents (Sampled Resident's #10, #78, #87, and #92). The findings included: 1) Review of the: Facility Standardized Recipe for Roasted Red Potatoes, documented the following: (a) Cut potatoes into wedges, slightly boil or steam potatoes before placing in roasting pan. (b) Bake at 375 F for 30 minutes until tender and lightly browned. (c) For Pureed: Measured desired servings into food processor. Blend until smooth. Add liquid for thinning and commercial thickener if product needs thickening. During the review of the approved menu for the lunch meal of 01/31/23, it was noted that a 4 ounce portion of Roasted Potatos was to be served for all Regular/No Added Salt Diet, and Carbohydrate Controlled/No Concentrated Sweet Diet (CCHO/No Concentrated Sweets). It was also noted that a 4 ounce portion of Mashed Potatoes be served for Ground Diet and Pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess 2 of 2 sampled residents for self-administration of medications for Resident #79 to safely store, transport and administer mediations at dialysis, and for Resident #34 to safely to store, and administer medications in the resident's room. The findings included: 1. Review of the Facility's Policy & Procedure for Self Administration of Medications, documented, in part: * Policy Heading: Resident have the right to self-administer medication if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. * The medication is appropriate for self-administration. * The resident is able to read and understand medication labels. * The resident can comprehend the medications purpose, proper dosage, timing, signs of side effects and when to report these to staff. * The resident has the physical capacity to open medication bottles, remove medication from a container, and ingest and swallow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide foot care to 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for foot care (Resident #39 and #78). The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #39's , clinical record documented an initial admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident was under hospice care since 10/14/22. The resident diagnoses included Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Atrial Fibrillation, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Diabetes Mellitus, Gout, Osteomyelitis of the lumbar sacral region and Stage IV Pressure Ulcer to the Sacrum. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating that the resident was moderately impaired. The assessment documented under Functional Status that the resident needed extensive to total assistance from the staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #39's care plan titled ADL initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician ordered Fluid restriction for 1 (Resident #79) 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: Review of facility policy for Restricted Fluids , noted the following: * Guidelines: 1) Follow specific instructions concerning fluid restrictions. 2) Record fluid intake on the intake output record. 3) Document the amount of fluids consumed by the resident during the shift. 4) Report information in accordance with facility and professional standards of practice. Review of the clinical record of Resident #79 on 01/31/23, revealed the following: 11/27/21 - Renal Diet - End Stage Renal Disease 11/29/21 - Sugar Free Prostat 30 ml TID (Three Times Daily) in beverage of choice 12/1/21 - Nepro 8 oz TID 11/29/21 - Fluid Restriction 1500 cc - Dietary 1020, Nursing = 480 11/30/21 - Fluid Restriction Day = 240 cc /Shift, Eve =120 cc/ Night Shift = 120 cc Dialysis M/W/F chair Time = 11:30 AM - Return 4:30 PM, WT before and after During the observation of the breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain resident's private health information in a secure manner and the facility failed to follow physician's orders for Resident #415. The findings included: 1) An observation was conducted on 02/01/23 at 8:36 AM in which Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse, left the computer on top of her medication cart open with resident information visible along with a piece of paper containing resident information left face-up on her medication cart in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. This was also observed by Staff G, Risk Manager. Staff G promptly covered the computer screen with the piece of paper while Staff F was in a resident's room administering medications. When Staff F returned to the medication cart, Staff G reminded her that the computer screens need to be turned off and any papers should be left face-down. Staff F acknowledged her, saying I should have minimized it (regarding the computer screen). 2) During a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 1 of 5Quality Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCLebanon, TN 2 of 5Nashville Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LlNashville, TN 2 of 5Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterYonkers, NY 2 of 5The Grove At Valhalla Rehab And Nursing CenterValhalla, NY 2 of 5The Paramount At Somers Rehab And Nursing CenterSomers, NY 2 of 5Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation aPort Jefferson, NY 3 of 5Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLCMiami, FL 3 of 5Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Glengariff Health Care CenterGlen Cove, NY 3 of 5Green Hills Center For Rehabilitation And HealingNashville, TN 3 of 5Pearl At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterPeekskill, NY 3 of 5The Grand Pavilion For Rehab & Nursing at RockvillRockville Centre, NY 3 of 5The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing CenterSuffern, NY 3 of 5Trevecca Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 4 of 5Chatham Hills Subacute Care CenterChatham, NJ 4 of 5Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMadison, TN 4 of 5Gallatin Center For Rehabilitation And HealingGallatin, TN 4 of 5Manchester Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LManchester, TN 4 of 5St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterSt James, NY 5 of 5Cortlandt HealthcareCortlandt Manor, NY 5 of 5Lebanon Center For Rehabilitation And Healing, LLCLebanon, TN 5 of 5Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills PondSt James, NY 5 of 5Palmetto Subacute Care CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSayville, NY 5 of 5The Chateau At Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Enclave At Rye Rehab And Nursing CtrPort Chester, NY 5 of 5The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center atNesconset, NY 5 of 5The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The RiversideNew York, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BOCA OP HOLDINGOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/26/2021
EINHORN, NEALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/15/2021
FRIEDMAN, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/15/2021
ANNO, TERRIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2024
FOSTER, TRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
RACKMAN, ALEXANDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MD FRIEDMAN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2021
NEAL EINHORN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2021
ZUCKER, YOSSIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.0M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 26%Other / private 33%

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$398per resident / day
operating cost
$12,092per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105476. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next