No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

115 Park Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (914) 423-9800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0608, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
131 Park Ave · (914) 375-4433 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2 Park Ave · (914) 964-1010 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
129 Lake Ave · (914) 963-3512 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Grant Park<0.1 mi
45 St Josephs Ave · (914) 377-6450 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight17.5%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.4%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.3%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.6%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.9%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.9%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.101.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.251.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.66U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 154 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 39.6–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.1–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.9–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
38.5%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-14)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2021-10-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident # 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #4 had deep tissue injuries to both feet and heel booties, recommended by the wound care consultant on 10/29/2024, were not implemented until after 01/07/2025.The findings include:Resident #4 had diagnoses including Arthritis, Muscle weakness, and malnutrition.The 7/28/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (resident assessment) documented moderately impaired cognition, impairments to both upper extremities. Resident #4 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and had no unhealed pressure ulcers.The 7/23/2024 At Risk for Pressure Injury Care Plan did not document interventions for offloading or heel booties.The 9/18/24 Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (resident assessment)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on video surveillance, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161), the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and mistreatment for 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/19/2025 at 11:55 PM, video surveillance reviewed revealed interaction between resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #1. Resident #1 was seated in their wheelchair in the doorway of their room while Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was at the medication cart with their back turned to Resident #1. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 is seen turning around and began a verbal exchange with Resident #1. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 is seen moving behind Resident #1's wheelchair and attempt to hold Resident #1's hand down and force him back into their room. Resident #1 is seen resisting. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 continued attempting to pull Resident #1 while seating in their wheelchair into their room.The Findings Include: Resident #1 was admitted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, on 08/19/2025 at 11:55 PM, video surveillance footage revealed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 engaged in a verbal interaction with Resident #1. Resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 were using hand gestures during the interaction. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 moved behind the wheelchair and attempted to pull the resident back into their room. Resident #1 was seen resisting and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 continued to forcefully pull the resident while seated in the wheelchair, into their room. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was seen holding the resident's arms and shoulders at a point despite the resident resisting. The facility's internal investigation ruled out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. The facility submitted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161) the facility did not ensure that residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, comprehensive care plan and the resident's choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pain. Specifically, Resident #1 had a Physician's order for Oxycodone HCL 5 mg orally every 6 hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 on 08/25/2025 revealed on 8/19/2025, they requested their pain medication from Licensed Practical Nurse #1 around 11:54pm because they were in pain. Resident #1 did not receive their pain medication. Resident #1 received their next dose of pain medication at 1:28AM on 08/20/2025, approximately eight hours and thirty-four minutes after the previous administration.The findings are:The facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management revised on 06/2024 documented assessing pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331684, NY00334367), the facility did not ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal care for 2 of 3(Resident #5, #6) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, (1) review of Resident #5's certified nurse assistant documentation for the months of January and February 2024 revealed bladder and bowel incontinence care was not provided by direct care staff on 19 occasions out of 31days. Further review of the January 2024 and February 2024 certified nurse assistant documentation revealed areas of care including showers, personal hygiene and assistance during meals were not consistently signed as being provided by direct care staff; (2) review of Resident #6's certified nurse assistant documentation for the months of January and February 2024 revealed bladder and bowel incontinence care was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00334367, NY00331640) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistent for residents according to the Facility Assessment. Nursing and certified nurse assistant staff levels were frequently below the levels determined by the facility to be necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, review of the facility daily staffing sheets for January 2024 and February 2024 revealed staffing was not adequate across various shifts based on the unit needs and (Provider Average Ratio)PAR levels documented in the facility assessment. The findings are: The facility undated Staffing Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy documented the facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff necessary to provide nursing and related care and service for all residents in accordance with the resident's care plans and the facility assessment. The Facility Assessment last revised 9/10/2024 documented the direct care staffing as follows for unit 2: Nurses: Day shift-Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00334367), the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication error for 4 (Residents #17, #20, #24, #34) out of 42 residents reviewed for medication. Specifically, on 2/25/2024 there was no nurse on the second floor to administer medications to the residents during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. 36 out of the 42 residents on the unit did not receive their medication with 30 of the residents having significant medications. Significant Medications that were not administered included: Antihypertensives, Retroviral, Anti-seizure, Anti-depressants, Antidiabetics, Insulin, Narcotics, Anticoagulants, Antibiotics, Immunosuppressants, Anti-Parkinsonism and Anti-psychotics. The Findings are: The Facility Adverse Consequences and Medication Error policy last revised February 2023 documented a medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (NY00360526), the facility did not ensure 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, 1.) Resident #1 who had a stage 2 pressure ulcer that was resolved on 10/29/24 and reopened on 1/28/25, was not being turned and positioned prior to 1/28/25 as per the certified nurse aide documentation. Furthermore, the Wound Care Doctor gave instructions on 1/28/25 to turn and reposition the resident every 1-2 hours while in bed and every 30 minutes while in chair, and the certified nurse aide documentation revealed that it was not being done. The findings are: The facility policy title ADL care last revised on 9/4/2024 documented that nursing staff must document all Activities of Daily Living(ADL) care in provided in the resident's electronic health record(EHR) or care documentation system Resident #1 was admitted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331684), the facility did not ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #5 had a weight loss of fifteen percent in thirty days. Review of Resident #5's certified nurse documentation revealed direct care staff were not consistently documenting the resident's intake and there were several occasions when the resident did not consume or only consumed twenty five percent of their meal. There was no documented evidence of nursing or administration being informed of Resident #5's poor intake. The findings are: The facility Interdisciplinary Management and Prevention of Significant Weight Loss of Nursing Facility Residents policy last revised/reviewed 2/7/2024 documented there will be a systematic and interdisciplinary approach to monitoring resident weights in the facility. The facility will develop a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00352230, NY00331567), the facility did not ensure the report of the results of an investigation was submitted to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law within 5 working days of the incident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) On 8/22/2024, Resident #2 was witnessed by Certified Nurse Aide #1, hitting Resident #3 on the back of the head with a flexi-bar (rubber cylinder used for therapy). Review of the 5-day investigative conclusion submission revealed it was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 8/28/2024; (2) On 1/14/2024, Resident #4 exited the facility through the front door unescorted and was found in a neighboring yard, the resident was taken to the hospital by emergency medical services. Review of the investigative summary revealed no documented evidence of the 5-day investigative conclusion being submitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00353705, NY00352230, NY00332692), the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 6 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #38, #39, #40) of 6 residents reviewed. Specifically, (1) on 9/8/2024 Resident #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 that Resident #2 had touched them inappropriately in their private area while they were roommates. Review of the facility incident report revealed the certified nurse aides assigned to the third-floor unit on 9/8/2024 did not provide any written statements regarding the incident. Review of the investigative summary revealed it was not dated and was not signed indicating it was not reviewed by the Medical Director; (2) On 8/22/2024 Resident #2 was witnessed by Certified Nurse Aide #1 hitting Resident #3 in the back of the head with a Flexi-bar (a rubber cylinder used in therapy). The facility investigative conclusion documented there was no cause to believe abuse had occurred.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00352230), the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 8/22/2024 Certified Nurse Aide #1 witnessed Resident #2 with a known history of inappropriate behaviors towards staff and others, striking Resident #3 (who had a history of wandering behavior and was care planned for supervision) on the head with a flexi-bar (rubber cylinder used in therapy) from behind. The investigative conclusion documented there is no evidence that any alleged abuse had occurred. The Findings are: 1) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Acquired Absence of Left Leg Above Knee, Unspecified Psychosis and Mood Disorder. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had impairment on one side of the lower extremity. The resident required a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure the accuracy of resident's assessments for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a documented history of wandering but was not identified as at risk for elopement by the facility on admission. Resident #4 was placed in a room on the first floor of the facility and on 1/14/2024, the resident exited the facility front doors unescorted after they were buzzed out by the Receptionist. The findings are: The undated facility admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse policy documented the purpose of the procedure is to gather information about the resident's physical, emotional, cognitive and psychosocial condition upon admission for the purposes of managing the resident, initiating the care plan, and comprehensive required assessment instruments. Conduct an admission assessment (history and physical) including a summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive patient centered care plan was developed for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a documented history of wandering. Resident #1 exited the facility through the front doors unescorted on 1/14/2024, after being buzzed out by the Receptionist. Review of Resident #4's care plan revealed they did not have a wandering or potential for elopement care plan in place. The Findings are: The facility Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy last revised March 2022 documented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for elopement. Specifically, on 1/14/2024 Resident #4 exited through the front doors of the facility unescorted, after being buzzed out by the Receptionist at 3:33 PM. Resident #4 with a documented history of wandering, was assigned a room on the first floor of the facility. Resident #4 exited the facility and wandered into a neighboring home near the facility and the neighbor called 911. The facility was notified of Resident #4's whereabouts around 4:31 PM by emergency medical services after the resident was transferred to the hospital. The Findings are: The Facility Elopement policy last revised 7/2024 documented when a resident is reported missing, the following action plan will be initiated to conduct a prompt, thorough search to locate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00347185) surveys from 8/6/2024 to 8/13/2024, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was evident for 2 (Resident #88 and #213) of 3 residents reviewed for pain. Specifically, 1) Resident #88 was not administered pain medication in accordance with Physician's Orders, was not provided non-medication interventions to address pain, and had recommendations for pain management by a Physiatrist that were not reviewed by the Physician Assistant, and 2) Resident #213 was not administered pain medication in accordance with Physician's Orders. The findings are: The facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management dated 6/2024 documented the medication administration record was reviewed to determine how often the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00347185) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident in accordance with the facility assessment. This was evident for 2 (2nd and 3rd Floor) of 3 units during staffing review. Specifically, 1) the Facility Assessment did not account for and plan to staff the 2nd and 3rd Floor with their higher resident capacity and census in comparison to the 1st Floor, 2) the projected staffing levels and actual staffing levels were less than the Facility Assessment's projected needs for the resident population of 2.2 Certified Nursing Assistant hours per resident per day, 3) F676 cited for activity of daily living care for Resident #95, and 4) residents reported delays in activities of daily living care related to the facility being short of staff. The findings are: 1) The Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of a resident's grievance and did not establish a grievance policy including all necessary elements. that includes notifying residents of their right to file a grievance . This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the facility Grievance Policy did not include the method used to notify residents of the grievance process and the resident's right to obtain the decision in writing, 2) Resident #10's Designated Representative reported the resident was missing clothing and glasses and was not provided with a prompt resolution. The findings are: The facility policy titled Investigations of Grievances/Concerns dated 6/13/2024 documented a thorough investigation of all grievances will be completed, and the resident or resident representative will be informed of the findings of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure an effective discharge planning process was developed and implemented focused on the resident's discharge goals, involved the resident and resident representative, and was updated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, upon return from the hospital and without the Designated Representative's involvement, Resident #10 was issued a Discharge Notice listing the destination as a skilled nursing facility that was not suitable for the resident's needs. The findings are: Resident #10 had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, catatonia, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired, did not display mood symptoms, and was physically aggressive towards others. On 08/07/2024 at 04:55 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification survey the facility did not ensure that each resident in need of assistance, to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #95 was not provided incontinence care as need or as scheduled. Findings include: Resident #95 had diagnoses including urinary tract infection, paraplegia, and respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact, and dependent on staff for transfer, ambulation, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #95 was frequently incontinent bowel and bladder. The grievance form dated 7/8/24 documented Resident #95 wanted their adult brief changed more often. The documented resolution was for Resident #95 to be changed every 2 hours and as needed when soiled. The nursing note dated 8/6/24 at 7:56 AM, documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00341698) on 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided to an existing pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 81) reviewed for pressure ulcer. Specifically Resident #81 was found with a skin opening on the sacrum on 8/1/2024 and a registered nurse did not assess the area or notify the physician until the following day. Findings include: The facility Policy on Pressure Injury Risk and Assessment, dated 5/24, documented information should be recorded in the resident's medical record to include any change in the resident's condition if identified, the condition of the skin if identified, initiation of a pressure or non-pressure form related to the type of alteration in skin if new skin alteration noted, documentation addressing MD notification if new skin alteration is noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/13/2024, the facility did not ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care at each visit. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Physician Assistant did not review a Nursing Pain Evaluation or the Physiatrist's pain management recommendations for Resident #88. The findings are: The facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management dated 6/2024 documented the physician and staff will establish a treatment regimen based on the resident's medical condition, course of illness, and treatment goals. If pain has not been adequately controlled, the multidisciplinary team, including the physician, shall reconsider approaches and adjust as indicated. On 08/06/2024 at 12:41 PM, Resident #88 was interviewed and stated they recently had a surgical amputation of their left leg above the knee and experienced persistent pain to the surgical site that was not relieved by their current pain medication. Resident #88…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #10's behavioral health plan of care was not individualized, reviewed, and revised to address symptomology related to their mental illness diagnoses. The findings are: Resident #10 had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, catatonia, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired, did not display mood symptoms, and was physically aggressive towards others. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments, dated 4/10/2024 and 5/13/2024, documented Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 08/6/24 to 08/14/24, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of no more than 5%, during a medication administration observation, when 2 of 25 opportunities (8%) resulted in error for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5). Specifically, 1) Resident # 5 was administered a crushed form of Enteric coated aspirin instead of chewable and a crushed form of Depakote delayed release tablet. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Administering Medications dated 06/07/24 documented medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to seizures, schizophrenia, hypertension. The current physician orders as of 8/9/24 documented Aspirin oral tablet chewable 81 mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for prophylaxis and Depakote tablet delayed release 500 mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day for mood disorder. In addition, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00341698) on 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that rehabilitative services were provided for 1 of 2 residents (#81) reviewed for weight loss. Specifically, Resident #81 the physician's order for a Speech Therapy evaluation for slow eating and chewing, was not completed. Findings include: The facility policy titled Rehabilitation Services created on 5/2022 documented Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Speech Therapy are provided in this facility for patients who present with mobility impairments, functional impairments, speech/language deficits, and swallowing deficits that require skilled intervention to either improve function or reduce caregiver burden. Upon admission to this facility, at any time a significant change of condition occurs and periodically throughout a resident's stay, the physician and staff will assess the resident's physical condition and functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey (08/06/24 to 08/14/24), the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices including hand hygiene were maintained to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (#15 and #4) of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Certified Nurse Aide #1's hand came in contact with Resident #15 food a during lunch meal observation and Licensed Practical Nurse #11 did not follow proper hand hygiene during a wound care treatment for Resident #4. 1) Resident #15 was admitted with diagnoses which included Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 6/30/24 documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required tray set up for eating. During an observation on 08/06/24 at 12:14 PM Certified Nurse Aide #1 delivered the lunch tray to Resident #15, opened the tray, and began to open up utensils and beverage containers. The Certified Nurse Aide was observed with their uncovered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 08/06/24 to 08/14/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #51) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #51 was offered, declined, or educated on the pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: The facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine last revised October 5, 2017, documented the facility will ask residents on admission if they have received the pneumococcal vaccine and the medical record will be reviewed to confirm this information. If the resident has not received the pneumococcal vaccine, information will be given to the resident/resident representative concerning pneumococcal vaccine and the Vaccine Information Sheet will be reviewed. The resident will be given the opportunity to ask questions concerning risks and benefits. If the resident wishes to receive the vaccine the resident/resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00334044), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 2/21/24, Dietary Aide #15 was witnessed by a Certified Nurse Aide #14, verbally threatening Resident #3 and pulling on Resident #3 beaded necklace. Resident #3 written statement documented that a staff member entered his room and held them by the shirt and chest area and verbally threatened him. Resident #3 was assessed with no injuries. Facility Investigation concluded abuse occurred. Findings include: The facility policy, 'Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating' approved 6/3/24 documented that the facility process was to report abuse and thoroughly investigate all reports of abuse, and to provide a follow-up investigation report within 5 business days of the incident. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis right shoulder, depression, and dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00342153) the facility did not develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1. Specifically, the heels of Resident #1 were not offloaded and or heel booties were not applied as per physician order and as per care plan. Findings are: The policy and procedure titled Pressure Injury Risk and Assessment dated 5/27/24 documented the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identification of residents at risk of developing new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure injuries. Multiple risk factors including but not limited to, impaired/decreased mobility and decreased functional ability, exposure of skin to urinary and fecal incontinence or other source of moisture. Once the assessment is conducted and risk factors are identified and characterized, a resident-centered care plan can be created to address the modifiable risks for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview conducted during a Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure labeling, dating and the monitoring of refrigerated food was maintained in accordance with Professional Standards of Food Safety. Specifically, prepared and frozen foods in the kitchen refrigerator and in the dry food storage room were not labeled and or not dated. The findings are: On 10/18/2021 during the recertification survey, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted at 9:40 AM, and the following issues were noted; The kitchen refrigerator was examined at 9:40 AM and it was noted that there were two paper plates with food wrapped in plastic wrap and the plates were not labeled and were not dated. In an interview at the time of the finding at approximately 9:45 AM, the Dietary Director stated that the food on the plates were leftover food for two separate residents The Dietary Director further stated that the plates were not labeled because the Dietary Director and staff are aware of the residents whom the plates belong when the plates were placed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F583 Based on observation and interviews conducted during recent recertification survey the facility did not ensure privacy was maintained for 1 of 1 resident (#72) reviewed for privacy. Specifically, 2 residents (#72 and #9) of the opposite sex were placed in adjoining rooms with a shared bathroom. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Quality of Life-Dignity dated 11/2020 documents staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy. Resident #72 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses Right Fracture of the Right Femur, Attention Deficit Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Per Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment tool) MDS quarterly assesment dated 9/6/21 resident #72 is moderately cognitively impaired and independent with toilet use. MDS admission assessment dated [DATE] states resident #72 needs extensive assistance for toileting with one-person physical assistance. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility 4/11/19 with diagnoses of Pneumonia, Parkinson's disease and Dementia without behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during recertification survey, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #158) reviewed for catheters, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident # 96,) the facility did not ensure that it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections. Specifically, Resident #158 catheter (urinary drainage tube) drainage bag (bag for collecting urine from the urinary drainage tube) was observed uncovered and on the floor on multiple days of survey, and Resident #96, had uncovered oxygen tubing and humidification bottles on several observations. The findings are: The facility policy Foley Catheters/Care dated 11/19/20 stated foley catheter drainage bags are to be kept below the residents bladder and off of the floor to keep from causing potential urinary tract infections. Catheter bags are to be covered when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident, or designated representative of cognitively impaired residents, was given the opportunity, if so desired, to formulate a written advance directive. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (#102 and #46). Specifically, (1) the designated representative for Resident #102 was not educated regarding the right to have an advanced directive formulated for the resident not to be resuscitated and (2) Resident #46 had a physician's order not to be intubated and there was no documented evidence that Resident #46 gave written consent for this order. The findings are: 1. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Dementia, Schizophrenia, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed no evidence that the resident's designated representative was educated on her right to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it implemented written policies and procedures for reporting an allegation of abuse made by a resident for 1 of 4 residents (#82) reviewed for abuse. The findings are: Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fractured Hip. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment tool) dated 6/7/18 documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment, and required extensive to total assistance of two persons to perform activities of daily living. A resident council meeting was conducted on 7/31/18 at 1:30 PM with Resident #82 present. The resident stated that she was admitted for rehabilitation for a fractured leg and that she felt she was handled in a rough manner by an aide during her first few weeks in the facility. She stated the aide was rough with her during cares. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] A. Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that all Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) were electronically transmitted to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system within 14 days of the final completion date for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for resident assessment. Specifically, residents (R) #1, #3, and #4 did not have the MDS data submitted within 14 days of completion of the MDS assessment. The finding is: The following residents were reviewed for Resident Assessment: - R #1 had an MDS admission Assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/3/18, a completion date of 7/10/18 was submitted on 7/31/18; - R #3 had an MDS admission Assessment with an ARD of 7/4/18, a completion date of 7/10/18 was submitted on 7/31/18; - R#4 had an MDS Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 2/17/18, a completion date of 3/3/18 was submitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 1 resident (#5) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the facility did not provide Resident #5 who had a tracheostomy (an incision is made on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea) with a device to enable the resident to speak more normally and/or communicate with others. The finding is: Resident # 5 had diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the bronchus and lungs and Respiratory Failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 12/27/17 indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and required tracheostomy care. A Tracheostomy Care Plan initiated 12/25/2017 and remained in effect at the time of the review included interventions to provide means of communication. This care plan did not indicate the methods of communication that would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide the necessary care and treatments to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 1 resident (#28) reviewed for non pressure related skin ulcer/wound. Specifically, the treatment plan was not revised to prevent further recurrence of a chronic skin irritation. The finding is: Resident # 28 was a admitted with diagnoses including Seizure Disorder and End Stage Renal Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment and screening tool) of 5/2/18 documented the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (a test used to measure orientation and memory recall) indicating she was moderately cognitively intact. The resident was interviewed on 7/31/18 at 10:20 AM and she stated the skin below her breast had some redness and she felt a burning sensation. The resident then lifted her shirt revealing redness below both breasts with residue from a cream which had been applied by the staff. She also pointed to her left and right inguinal areas stating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that an audiology evaluation was performed as ordered by the medical provider for 1 of 2 residents (#46) reviewed for vision and hearing. The finding is: Resident #46 has diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiovascular disease, and Renal Insufficiency. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set; a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 2/14/18 documented that the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status) indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated that the resident's hearing was adequate and did not use hearing aids. A subsequent Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented adequate hearing and no hearing aid was being used. The patient-centered comprehensive care plan (CCP) of 10/2/17 revealed no evidence of a care plan to address communication. The physician's orders form dated 5/21/18 revealed an order for an audiology consult and follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 2 residents (#94) reviewed for urinary incontinence that the necessary care to promote and maintain bladder continency to the extent possible was provided. Specifically, the type of urinary incontinence was not identified and a patient-centered care plan, based on the type of incontinence and maintenance versus restorative goals and interventions, was not developed to address the bladder incontinence across all shifts. The findings are: Resident #94 is a non-ambulatory resident whose diagnoses include End Stage Renal Disease and Diabetes Mellitus. The resident receives dialysis treatment three days weekly, leaving the facility on the day shift and returning on the evening shift. The Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 3/17/18, documented that the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with toileting, and was occasionally incontinent of urine (defined in MDS as less than 7 episodes of incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 2 out of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition (#46 and #94) that there was coordination between nursing and dietary to ensure that the fluids offered to the resident did not exceed the physician's order to prevent fluid overload. The findings are: 1. Resident #46 has diagnoses and conditions including Diabetes Mellitus, cardiovascular disease, Renal Insufficiency and receiving dialysis three times a week. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS: a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 2/14/18 documented the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (a test used to measure memory and orientation) which suggested that the resident is cognitively intact; resident eats with set-up help and supervision; height 72 inches; weight was 284 pounds; no signs of weight loss or gain > than 5% in one month or 10% in 6 months; and received a therapeutic diet. The subsequent Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility (1.) did not provide for 1 of 1 residents (#5), reviewed for respiratory care, a device to enable the resident to speak more clearly and to be more easily understood during conversation with others. Additionally, (2.) manual resuscitative devices (ambu bags) were not easily accessible in case of an emergency for resident (#5) and for one random resident (#51) with a tracheostomy (trach) tube on the First floor unit. A tracheostomy is a surgical procedure which consist of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea. The findings are: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the bronchus and lungs and Respiratory Failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 12/27/17 indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and required tracheostomy care. The Tracheostomy Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide ongoing evaluation and management of pain for 1 of 4 residents (#46) reviewed for pain management. The findings are: Resident #46 has diagnoses and conditions including complete traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle, Diabetes Mellitus, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) without Esophagitis, and Osteomyelitis. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 2/14/18 documented the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a test used to measure memory and orientation) which suggested that the resident is cognitively intact; received scheduled pain medication during the assessment period; had frequent pain with an intensity of 5; had medications in the previous 7 days which included an opioid in 4 of 7 days; and did not receive therapies. The Pain Management assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident's pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that medical supervision was provided for 1 of 5 residents (#45) reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, the physician or the Nurse Practitioner (NP) did not address the resident's significant unplanned weight loss and the abnormal nutritionally-related laboratory values in light of adequate protein, calories and fluid consumption. The finding is: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's admitting diagnoses included Anemia, Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Kidney Disease. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) done on 2/2/18 noted that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required total assistance for all activities of daily living, weighed 116 lbs. (same weight noted on MDS of 11/10/17), was on a therapeutic diet (No Added Salt, Diabetic), and had two Stage 1 pressure ulcers and one Stage IV pressure ulcer. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5%. This was evident for 2 of 6 residents (#267 and #38) observed during a medication pass for a total of 3 out of 31 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 9.6%. The findings are: 1. Resident #267 has diagnoses including Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anemia. A medication pass observation was conducted on 8/2/18 at 9:18 AM on the First floor unit. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2) administered the medications, which included one Multiple Vitamin tablet from a facility stock bottle. Review of the physician orders dated 7/13/18 revealed that the resident should have received one Multiple Mineral tablet orally daily for supplement. LPN #2 was interviewed on 8/2/18 at 1:15 PM following review of the physician's orders and stated that she administered the red Multiple Vitamin tablet and did not realize that the order indicated multiple mineral tablet. 2. Resident #38 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the necessary dental services were provided in a timely manner including arrangements to obtain dentures for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #94) reviewed for dental services. The findings are: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses and conditions including Diabetes Mellitus, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Anemia . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment tool) of 3/10/17 indicated resident has moderately impaired cognition and no dental issues were identified. A review of the resident's dental evaluation dated 9/28/17 revealed that the dentist noted at that time that the resident had only one top tooth and that the resident wanted it to be extracted. The evaluation further documented that the resident wanted upper dentures and that this would be addressed at the next visit. The follow-up visit occurred on 10/9/17 and the dentist documented that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were consistently offered and provided with evening snacks. Specifically, 7 out of 10 alert and oriented residents from 2 out of 3 units, that attended the resident council meeting stated that they were not offered a snack, or if they asked for a snack they were not provided with an evening snack. The findings are: A resident council meeting was conducted on 7/31/18 at 1:30 PM. Seven out of 10 ten residents in attendance stated they were not provided or offered evening snacks and if they asked for an evening snack, they were told by the staff that there was not enough snacks, no snacks were available, or that the kitchen was closed. During an observation on 7/31/18 at 7:00-7:30 PM on 2 of the 3 units (2nd and 3rd), evening snacks were placed at the nursing station waiting to be distributed to the residents. The 2nd floor unit had a tray of 15 cookie packages and one large container of juice and 3 small cans of ginger ale. The 3rd floor unit also had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that measures were in place to prevent the spread of infection and cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #5). The resident was observed on multiple occasions using his bare fingers to cover his tracheostomy tube (a type of airway inserted directly into the trachea) to communicate with others after touching objects and surfaces, potentially contaminating the tracheostomy (trach) tube without using proper hand hygiene. Additionally, resident care items including oxygen tubes and feeding supplies were stored in containers that were placed directly on the floor on 2 out 3 facility units (1st and 3rd). The findings are: 1. Resident # 5 had diagnoses and conditions including malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung, and Respiratory Failure. The resident was interviewed on 7/30/18 at 1:12 PM and he stated that he was waiting for a speaking device to assist him in communicating with others which was not available at this time. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-10-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure accurate staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. Specifically, 1) the facility did not post the total and actual hours of licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care daily and 2) did not provide complete staffing records for the 18 months reviewed. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Daily Staffing, documents the total and actual hours will be noted in the following categories of licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care each shift. (Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants and Resident Census) During the initial tour of the survey on 10/18/21 at 9:15 AM, the staffing posted at the front desk was missing nursing staff hours. Daily staffing sheets were requested for April 1, 2020-July 31,2021 and were not available for review. Review of the staffing sheets revealed on August 1-5 2021 staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 1 of 5Quality Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCLebanon, TN 2 of 5Nashville Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LlNashville, TN 2 of 5The Grove At Valhalla Rehab And Nursing CenterValhalla, NY 2 of 5The Paramount At Somers Rehab And Nursing CenterSomers, NY 2 of 5Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation aPort Jefferson, NY 3 of 5Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLCMiami, FL 3 of 5Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Glengariff Health Care CenterGlen Cove, NY 3 of 5Green Hills Center For Rehabilitation And HealingNashville, TN 3 of 5Pearl At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterPeekskill, NY 3 of 5The Grand Pavilion For Rehab & Nursing at RockvillRockville Centre, NY 3 of 5The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing CenterSuffern, NY 3 of 5Trevecca Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 4 of 5Chatham Hills Subacute Care CenterChatham, NJ 4 of 5Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMadison, TN 4 of 5Gallatin Center For Rehabilitation And HealingGallatin, TN 4 of 5Legacy At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 4 of 5Manchester Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LManchester, TN 4 of 5St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterSt James, NY 5 of 5Cortlandt HealthcareCortlandt Manor, NY 5 of 5Lebanon Center For Rehabilitation And Healing, LLCLebanon, TN 5 of 5Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills PondSt James, NY 5 of 5Palmetto Subacute Care CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSayville, NY 5 of 5The Chateau At Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Enclave At Rye Rehab And Nursing CtrPort Chester, NY 5 of 5The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center atNesconset, NY 5 of 5The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The RiversideNew York, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESTCHESTER PARK VENTURES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/27/2008
EINHORN, NEALIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY25%since 05/27/2008
FRIEDMAN, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY33%since 05/27/2008
MINZER, MIRIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY29%since 05/27/2008
MINZER, NAFTALIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 05/27/2008
CHALMERS, SHERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2024
RABADI, AMMIRIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/1999
SCHACHTER, ARYEHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/29/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 23%Other / private 12%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,124per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$466per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335398. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next