No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pearl At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And Nursin

1701 NE 26th St, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33305 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 206 certified beds · (954) 566-8353 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 566-8353 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$34,937 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,937 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-31)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1402 NE 26th St · (954) 565-7789 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2540 NE 15th Ave · (954) 390-0445 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2633 N Dixie Hwy · (954) 566-6363 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.8%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.4%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.202.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.711.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 209 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.6%CMS range 23.7–44.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.1–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.2%CMS range 6.3–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 206 beds and averages 183.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to identify and treat a wound in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for diabetic wounds, Resident #148. The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] post hospitalization. The resident's diagnoses (dx) included End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date of 08/07/23, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Physician's orders for the month of May 2023 revealed a treatment order for A&D ointment and to apply topically to bilateral lower extremities and feet every shift for dryness / skin protection daily, and weekly skin assessments every Friday on the 11-7 shift (11 PM - 7 AM). Review of the Treatment Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant weight loss of 8.33% and failed to provide nutritional intervention in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding, Resident #522. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Nutritional Assessment, dated 05/19/23, documented, in part, the following: As part of the comprehensive assessment, the nutritional assessment will be a systematic, multidisciplinary process that includes gathering and interpreting data and using that data to help define meaningful interventions for the resident at risk for or with impaired nutrition. For residents who are receiving enteral nutrition support, the nutritional assessment shall include gathering information and documenting why the enteral nutrition is medically necessary. Review of the facility policy, titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 05/19/23 documented, in part, the following: Under Weight Assessment - Residents are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to perform appropriate nutrition monitoring on a resident with oral intake; failed to re-assess by monitoring weights per facility policy; and failed to address or prevent the resident's avoidable significant severe, weight loss of 36 percent for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for nutritional risk (Residents #78). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights Record maintenance and Interventions Revised March 2021 showed the following: The nursing staff will measure residents' weight within 72 hours of admission and one week after the 1st weight. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weight will be measured monthly thereafter. Any weight change of 5 pounds or more, since last weight assessment will be taken for confirmation. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria (where percentage of body weight loss = (usual weight-actual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and to ensure the prevention of foodborne illnesses for 187 of 196 residents. The findings included: 1. During tour of the Main Kitchen on 12/09/24 at 9:30 AM, and accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), the following was observed and noted: a. The handwashing station near the entry door had a dark substance on the grout just above the sink. DM made aware. b. There was thick, burnt-yellow colored residue approximately 8 inches long, with varying widths, on the exterior side walls of the two Vulcan ovens. c. The back left corner of the Arctic walk-in refrigerator had brown debris splattered on the tiles close to the wall and close the leg of the shelving fixture. The leg of the fixture was resting on top of a folded-up piece of white paper soiled with various colors of debris. A yellow food substance was on the floor close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate that an effective plan of actions was implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F550, Resident Rights / Exercise of Rights; F692, Nutrition / Hydration Status Maintenance; F755, Pharmacy Services / Procedures / Pharmacist / Record; F809, Frequency of Meals / Snacks at Bedtime; and F880, Infection Prevention and Control. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect all 196 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited at F550, F692, F755, F809 and F880 during the recertification survey with an exit date of 08/31/23. The repeated deficient practices was identified for F550, Resident Rights / Exercise of Rights; F692, Nutrition / Hydration Status Maintenance; F755, Pharmacy Services / Procedures / Pharmacist / Record;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 5 of 5 sampled residents observed during dining observations, Resident #48, Resident #38, Resident #311, Resident #115, and Resident #67, as evidenced by calling residents 'feeders' and staff standing to feed residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Dignity, dated 11/14/24, revealed the following, in part: The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values and beliefs. Staff always speak respectfully to residents, and not labeling or referring to the residents by his or her room number, diagnoses, or care needs. 1. In an observation conducted on 12/10/24 at 8:25 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse, was noted on the 100's Hallway, passing the breakfast trays to staff. He was observed taking a breakfast tray and giving it to a staff member and said she is a feeder as he was passing the breakfast tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments related to medications and diagnosis for 3 of 5 sampled resident reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #77, Resident #167, and Resident #168. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #77's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Fall, Chronic Pain, Tobacco Use, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Major Depressive Disorder, Nicotine Dependence, Persistent Mood Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia. Review of the physician order dated 08/20/24 documented, Nicotine Patch 24 Hour 7 MG (milligrams) /24 HR (hour), apply 1 patch transdermally one time a day for Smoking Cessation and remove per schedule. Review of Resident #77's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #77's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident diagnoses included Tobacco Use, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Nicotine Dependence, Persistent Mood Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #77's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 14 indicating the resident had no cognition impairment. Review of Resident #77's clinical record documented the Smoking assessment was conducted in for July, August and November 2024. . Review of a physician order dated 08/20/24 documented, Nicotine Patch 24 Hour 7 MG (milligrams) 24HR (hour). Apply 1 patch transdermally one time a day for Smoking Cessation and remove per schedule. Review of Resident #77's active care plan, titled, Resident has history smoking, initiated and updated on 11/20/24. The care plan interventions included Nicotine patch 24 hour 14 mg/24 hour one time a day for smoking cessation for two months . The care plan lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) published 09/26/24, documented in the Policy Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily (ADLs) independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene .2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care); .6. Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences, stated goals and recognized standards of practice. 7. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate urinary catheter care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter care, Resident #102. The finding included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Catheter Care Urinary, published on 10/07/24, revealed that the purpose of urinary catheter care is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Under infection control on page 1, statement #2, revealed that catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Under the complications on page 2, statement #1, revealed to observe the resident for complications associated with urinary catheters; and to report unusual findings to the physician or supervisor immediately if, urine has unusual appearance (i.e., color, blood, etc.). Routine Perineal hygiene on page 3, under statement 18, revealed that after urinary perineal care is done, and disposable items were discarded, staff must remove gloves, and wash and dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's scales were calibrated for accuracy and failed to ensure that nutritional supplements were provided in a timely manner for 2 of 10 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #100 and Resident #311. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Interdisciplinary Management and Prevention of Significant Weight Loss of Nursing Facility Residents, dated 09/20/22, documented in part the following: the purpose is to provide guidelines for detection of early unplanned weight loss, which includes communication and appropriate action by the team to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status of nursing facility residents. Residents who lose weight will be identified and managed in a timely manner. Reweigh residents with significant weight discrepancies within 24 hours if needed and monitor all interventions for efficacy and feasibility. Further review of the policy showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and procedures, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a current specified physician's order to address the care and maintenance of an Intravenous (IV) / Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line and to label and date the resident's PICC line site dressing for 3 of 3 sampled residents observed, Resident #308, Resident #185 and Resident #198. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Peripheral and Midline IV Dressing Changes, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), published 09/26/24 documented in the Policy Statement: Purpose: This purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened or soiled catheter-site dressings. General Guidelines: 1. Perform site care and dressing change at established intervals or immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (e.g. damp, loosened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it obtained current physician's orders for Oxygen therapy administration for 1 of 6 sampled residents observed receiving continuous Oxygen on the South wing, Resident #309; and failed to monitor residents receiving Nebulizer treatments, according to standards of care, for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #120. The findings included: 1. Review of the policy and procedure, titled, Oxygen Administration, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), published 10/07/24, documented in the Policy Statement: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe Oxygen administration. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for Oxygen administration. 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .Assessment: Before administering Oxygen, and while the resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for fluid restrictions for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #123 and Resident #89. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #123 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of End-Stage Renal Disease and is dependent on dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #123 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders showed an order dated 12/09/24 for fluid restrictions of 1500 milliliters (ml) a day, with 420 ml allocated for nursing and 1080 ml allocated for dietary. Further orders showed that Resident #123 was receiving dialysis three times a week in-house. In an observation conducted on 12/09/24 at 12:55 PM, Resident #123 was not in the room, and her lunch tray was noted at the bedside. The lunch tray was noted with a meal ticket that showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medication reconciliations were accurate for 4 of 12 sampled residents reviewed during the controlled substance record review, Residents #14, #168, #186, and #201. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Controlled Substances, dated 11/2022, included the following: The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirement related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. Dispensing and Reconciling Controlled Substances: 1.Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up. 2.The system of reconciling the receipt, dispensing and disposition of controlled substances includes the following: a. Records of personnel access and usage; b. Medication administration records; c. Declining inventory records; and d.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regimen (psychotropic's, antipsychotic, antiplatelet and hypoglycemic medications) were monitored appropriately as evidenced of the lack of written documentation of medication side effects, medication efficacy and behavior that were being monitored for 5 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #77, #86, #167, and #145, for unnecessary medications, and for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #73, reviewed for Mood / Behavior. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Pharmacy Services-Role of the Consultant Pharmacist, with a revision date of 04/2019, documented in part, .the facility shall have the services of a consultant pharmacist .collaborates on other aspects of pharmacy services, including .recommending current resources to help staff identify .medications side effects and/or adverse effects .the consultant pharmacist will provide specific activities related to medication regimen review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store residents glucometers in a sanitary manner; failed to securely lock the North wing medication storage door, and failed to secure medications at the bedsides for 1 resident, Resident #407. The resident census at the time of survey was 196. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedure, titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) published 11/08/24, documented in the Policy Statement: The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Statement #2 revealed the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Statement # 3 of the same policy revealed if the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their menu for the regular diet during 1 of 2 observations in the main kitchen. This has the potential to affect 117 residents on a regular diet. The census at the time of survey was 196. The findings included: Review of the fall/winter 2024 diet guide sheet provided to the surveyors included the following menu for the regular diet consistency: 4-ounces (oz) of seasoned cauliflower, 4-oz of spanish rice and 3-oz of apple butter pork loin. In an observation conducted in the main kitchen on 12/11/24 at 11:25AM, the surveyor observed that a lunch tray consisted of pieces of Apple Butter Pork Loin that were pre-sliced. The surveyor asked to put a piece of the Pork Loin on a facility's scale which showed the slice of Pork had a weight of 2.25 ounces. The piece of the Pork was not the correct weight according to the facility's menu that should have been for 3 ounces. An interview was conducted on 12/12/24 at 2:00 PM with the Food Service Director IFSD) who stated that the cook is supposed to pre-cut the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review and record review, the facility failed to provide food in a form designed to meet individual needs for the Pureed diet consistency for 2 of 2 sampled residents observed during dining, Resident #22 and Resident #48. This has the potential to affect 17 residents on a Pureed diet. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Modified Solid/Liquid Diet Consistency Policy and Procedure, not dated, showed the following: the purpose of this policy is to promote safe swallowing and minimize the risk of aspiration of solids/liquids for patients with impaired swallowing abilities. When prepared appropriately, it allows patients to exert less effort with mastication and allows the ability to control the solids and Liquids in the mouth. This yields a more efficient and safer swallow with less risk of aspiration or choking. It further showed that for the Pureed consistency diet, the food that is allowed on this plan must be pureed, cohesive, pudding-like food in a form without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Resident Food Preferences, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) published 03/13/23, documented in the Policy Statement: Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Upon the resident's admission (or within twenty-four (24) hours after his/her admission) the dietician or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. 2. When possible, staff will interview the resident directly to determine current food preferences based on history and life patterns related to food and mealtimes. 3. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preferences in the care plan. 4. The dietician and nursing staff, assisted by the physician, will identify any nutritional issues and dietary recommendations that might be in conflict with the resident's food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards and ensure that Hospice documentation was readily available for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Hospice, Resident #59. The findings included: Review of the facility Agreement provided by the facility with the Hospice company and signed on 07/27/2023 documented, in part: Facility shall prepare and maintain medical records for each Hospice patient receiving services pursuant to this Agreement. The medical records shall consist of progress notes and clinical notes detailing all Inpatient Services and events. At the request of the Hospice, a copy of the patient's medical history, records and discharge summary shall be provided to the Hospice. Additionally, a review of the Integrated Plan of Care between the Skilled Nursing Facility and the [company] Hospice dated 10/16/2024 stated the following: [company] Hospice Nurse and SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility] representative or staff designee will discuss patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) guidelines for 4 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for EBP, Resident #26, Resident #465, Resident #139, and Resident #460; failed to ensure employees kept fingernails trimmed as per facility's policy; and failed to keep a nebulizer mask stored in a sanitary manner. The findings included: Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Enhanced-Barrier Precautions guidelines revealed, in part, the following: Everyone must clean their hands including when both entering and leaving the room; Providers and Staff must also; wear gloves and a gown for the following: high-contact care resident care activities, dressing, bathing-showering; transferring; changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, wound care any skin opening requiring a dressing. The CDC website included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility's staff failed to encourage and ensure that residents practiced hand hygiene before eating meals for 5 of 5 sampled residents observed during mealtimes, Resident #127, Resident #123, Resident #133, Resident #138, and Resident #39. This had the potential to affect 49 residents that are on the 300 unit. The facility also failed to follow proper infection control standards during medication administration observation for 2 of 7 sampled residents, Resident #15 and Resident #9. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Handwashing/hand Hygiene, dated 05/18/23, documented that the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. It further directs using hand washing or alcohol-based hand rub before and after eating or handling food. In an observation conducted on 08/28/23 at 12:15 PM on the 300 unit, the first meal cart arrived. Staff started passing out the trays to the individual resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to conduct proper admission, readmission, and quarterly smoking assessments for 10 of 10 sampled residents, reviewed for smoking safety, and as identified by the facility as smokers. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Smoking Policy-Residents, published 05/19/23, included, in part, the following: Resident smoking status is evaluated upon admission. A resident's ability to smoke safely is re-evaluated quarterly, upon significant change, and as determined by the staff. The facility provided a Smoker List upon request during the Entrance Conference conducted on 08/28/23. Of the residents named on this list, 10 remained as active residents of the facility. The following are the 10 identified residents who smoke who were found to have discrepancies in smoking assessments, either upon admission, readmission, or quarterly: 1. Resident #422 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission MDS was done on 08/28/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' privacy in a dignified manner for 3 of 5 sampled residents observed, Resident #130, Resident #268 and Resident #267. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure, on 08/30/23 at 2:35 PM, titled, Dignity, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) published 05/19/23 documented, in part, in the 'Policy Statement: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .11. Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures .' Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) job description on 08/31/23 at 9:35 AM dated January 2023 provided by the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to transmit Resident Assessments in a timely manner for 20 of 24 sampled residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) discrepancies, Residents #142, 143, 26, 120, 13, 20, 65, 136, 118, 140, 135, 95, 63, 117, 77, 67, 92, 48, 51 and 146. The findings included: Following the Survey Day 2 Transition Meeting, the surveyors noted the Resident Assessment Facility Task was triggered for review. Twenty-four (24) residents were identified in this task to be reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) Record over 120 days old. On 08/30/23 at 10:23 AM, the 24 triggered residents' records were reviewed with Staff Q, MDS Coordinator and Staff R, MDS Coordinator. During this record review, it was noted that 20 of the 24 triggered residents had MDS's which were not transmitted properly per the Federal Regulations. During this record review, Staff R stated the facility was aware that there was an issue with transmitting MDS's due to the changing of Electronic Health Records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper usage and documentation of hand splints for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hand splints, Resident #265. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 08/31/23 at 11:35 AM, titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) published 05/19/23, documented in part, the following: Under Policy Statement: Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent principles of safe and effective order writing. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Only authorized, licensed practitioners, or individuals authorized to take verbal orders from practitioners, shall be allowed to write orders in the medical record 5. The signing of orders shall be by signature or a personal computer key . Review of the facility policy and procedure on 08/31/23 at 11:45 AM, titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), provided by the DON published 12/28/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 2 of 6 sampled residents, reviewed for nutrition, Resident #365 and Resident #340. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Nutrition Assessment, dated 05/19/23, documented, in part, the following: the dietitian, in conjunction with the nursing staff, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission (within 14 days). The nutritional assessment will include the current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 05/19/23, documented, in part, the following: residents' weights are monitored for unintended weight loss. Any weight change of 5 percent or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. 1. Record review documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents medications refills were reorder in a timely manner for 3 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for medications and timeliness of administration, Resident #44, # 89, and #434. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, revised dated January 2018, documented, in part, .the facility maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt . Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication and treatment Orders, published dated 05/19/23, documented, in part, .drugs and biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than three (3) days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure that refills are readily available . 1. Review of Resident #44's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmission. The resident's diagnoses included Dry Eye Syndrome, Dementia and Cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) physician orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 1 of 5 sampled residents for unnecessary medication (Resident #144). The findings included: Record review documented that Resident #144 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Major Depressive Disorder and Unspecific Psychosis. Review of the Physician's orders showed the following order, dated 04/17/23 with no stop date, for Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams to be given every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the Pharmacy recommendation book showed the following: no recommendations were provided on 04/25/23 regarding the above medication PRN status; no recommendations were provided on 05/09/23 for the above medication PRN status; and no recommendation was provided on 06/29/23 for the above medication PRN status. Further review showed that it was not until 07/29/23 that a recommendation was given regarding the Lorazepam PRN order that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct fluid consistency for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #63. The findings included: Record review documented Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Lupus, Anemia, and Major Depression. Review of the physician ordered diet included: diet order dated 06/14/23 for no added salt diet with regular texture and nectar-thickened liquids. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #63 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The care plan initiated on 07/10/23 documented Resident #63 is at high nutritional risk for dysphagia and is on thickened liquids by the Speech Language Pathologist (ST). It further showed that Resident #63 is blind in one eye. In an observation conducted on 08/28/23 at 10:34 AM, Resident #63 was in her room with the breakfast tray. The meal ticket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a nourishing snack was available at bedtime if more than 14 hours passed between the evening and breakfast meals. This was observed for 3 of 3 sampled residents during dining observations, Resident #138, Resident #39 and Resident #92. It had the potential to affect 33 residents who resided on the 300 Unit, of the census of 181 residents. The findings included: A review of the facility's Bulk Snack list provided by the Dietary Manager showed the following: a pitcher of orange juice, a pitcher of cranberry juice, graham crackers or soft cookies, ½ peanut butter and jelly sandwich, fresh fruit, apple sauce, yogurt, tea bags, and sugar. Review of the census list provided by the facility on 08/28/23 showed there were 49 residents in the 300 Unit, 47 in the 100 Unit, 47 in the 200 Unit, and 38 in the 400 Unit. Review of the Diabetic snack list provided by the facility showed that 16 residents had diabetic snacks ordered at night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and follow the care plan for eating assistance for 1 out of 28 sampled Residents (Resident #2). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, supporting revised in March 2018, showed that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. It further showed that total dependence is full staff performance of an activity with no participation by the resident. In an observation conducted on 04/26/22 at 8:35 AM, the breakfast tray was brought into Resident #2's room. Staff went into the room at 8:40 AM to help set up the tray and left the room at 8:42 AM. Continued observation at 9:00 AM, showed that Resident #2's tray was 100% untouched. At 9:10 AM the breakfast tray was taken out of the room by staff untouched. In an observation conducted on 04/27/22 at 8:04 AM, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to order, receive and administer pain medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pain management (Resident #49). The findings included: The facility's policy for 'Pain Assessment and Management', dated 2001 and most recently revised March 2015, documented: General Guidelines 2. Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. Recognizing pain 1. Observe the resident (during rest and movement) for physiologic and behavioral (non-verbal) signs of pain. 2. Possible Behavior signs of pain: a. Verbal expressions such as groaning, crying, screaming; b. Facial expressions such as grimacing frowning, clenching of the jaw, etc.; c. Changes in gait, skin color and vital signs. The facility's policy for 'Medication and Treatment Orders' dated 2001 and most recently revised July 2016,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and policy review; the facility failed to remove narcotics from 2 of 8 medication carts for 3 of 3 sampled residents who did not have current orders for the narcotics, Resident #84, #135 and #438. The findings included: The facility's policy titled Storage of Medication revised April 2007 reveals The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. On 04/28/22 at 9:30 AM, the Medication Cart for Team 1 in the 100 unit was reviewed with Staff J, a Registered Nurse (RN). Resident #84's medication card for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) was in the narcotic lock box with no current order. The order stopped on 04/22/22. On 04/28/22 at 9:45 AM, the Medication Cart for Team 2 in the 300 unit was reviewed with Staff K, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Resident #135's medication card for Tramadol 50 mg was in the narcotic lock box. The order stopped on 04/15/22. Additionally, in the Medication Cart for Team 2 in the 300 unit, was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication ordered by the practitioner were necessary and the resident's representative was aware and involved in the decision for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #110). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications revised in April 2019 showed that following: if medication and dosage is believed to be excessive for the resident, or has been identified as having potential adverse consequences, the person preparing the medication will contact the prescriber and the resident's attending physician to discuss the concerns. In an interview conducted on 04/25/22 at 12:30 PM, with Resident #110's son, he stated that his mom was placed on psychotropic medication without their knowledge. He further said that the only reason he knew that his mom was placed of the new psychotropic medication was after the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to secure medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #190) identified in the north wing. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revised on 04/2007 documented .drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems . Review of the facility's policy titled Preparation and General Guidelines-Self-Administration of Medications revised on 01/2018 documented .if the residents desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team .the interdisciplinary team verifies the resident's ability to self-administer medications . Review of Resident #190's clinical record documented an admission to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Left Hip repaired, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Depression, Macular Degeneration, Glaucoma and Muscle weakness. The residents baseline care plan included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 3 of 3 sampled resident reviewed for nutrition, therapeutic diets (mechanical soft) for Residents #110, #51, and #34. The findings included: A review of the facility's guidelines utilized the the main kitchen titled, Nutritional Education for Mechanical Soft Diet from the Manual of Medical Nutrition Therapy 2019 Edition showed the following: foods allowed in the mechanical soft diet are eggs, ground or chopped moist meats, baked fish, stewed made with tender chopped meat, finely ground chicken and well-cooked vegetables. A review of the facility's Speech Language Pathologist guidance titled Understanding Mechanical Soft Diets, undated, showed the following: Level-2 consist of foods that are moist, soft texture and easily swallowed. Meats are ground or finely cut to equal size no bigger than 1/4 inch. A review of the Nutrition Care Manual under section Dysphagia Level 3: Advanced or Mechanical Soft, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews; the facility failed to carry out a physician's order for blood testing for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #11). The findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. A 5 day Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 11/17/21 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 0, which indicates the resident has severe cognitive impairment. A review of the physician's orders dated 04/01/22 reveals an order for Depakote DR (delayed-release) 125 milligrams (mg) sprinkle cap administer two by mouth three times daily. An additional order dated 04/01/22 reads Depakote level in one week, Thyroid profile all in one week along with FBS (fasting blood sugar). Further record review revealed there was no evidence the orders were completed. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-12 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours for 3 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #36, Resident #508 and Resident #189. The findings included: 1. Review of the clincial record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #36 showed the baseline care plan was created (started by one staff member) on 11/01/24 and locked (completed by all required staff members) on 11/05/24. 2. Review of the clincial record for Resident #508 revealed an admission date of 11/29/24. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #508 showed the baseline care plan was created (started by one staff member) on 11/29/24 and locked (completed by all required staff members) on 12/02/24. 3. Review of the clincial record for Resident #189 revealed an admission date of 10/18/24. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #189 showed the baseline care plan was created (started by one staff member) on 10/18/24 and locked (completed by all required staff members) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and an interview, the facility failed to ensure that a nourishing snack was served to residents as required when the time lapse between the dinner and the breakfast meals was greater than 14 hours. This was observed for 1 of 1 sampled resident during observations, Resident #121. It had the potential to affect 22 of 24 residents on oral diets in the wing of rooms that included rooms 201A through 212 B. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #121 was admitted with a diagnosis of Cancer, Anemia, Orthostatic Hypotension, Thyroid Disorder, and Depression. The documented Brief Interview of Mental Status score per Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A resident council meeting was held on 12/11/2024 at 02:07 PM. Fourteen residents attended. The consensus was that there are problems in the kitchen. Residents complained of difficulty in obtaining snacks that they like at the times that they want them. Resident #121…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,937 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $34,937 — penalty dated 2023-08-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 1 of 5Quality Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCLebanon, TN 2 of 5Nashville Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LlNashville, TN 2 of 5Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterYonkers, NY 2 of 5The Grove At Valhalla Rehab And Nursing CenterValhalla, NY 2 of 5The Paramount At Somers Rehab And Nursing CenterSomers, NY 2 of 5Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation aPort Jefferson, NY 3 of 5Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLCMiami, FL 3 of 5Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Glengariff Health Care CenterGlen Cove, NY 3 of 5Green Hills Center For Rehabilitation And HealingNashville, TN 3 of 5Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterPeekskill, NY 3 of 5The Grand Pavilion For Rehab & Nursing at RockvillRockville Centre, NY 3 of 5The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing CenterSuffern, NY 3 of 5Trevecca Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 4 of 5Chatham Hills Subacute Care CenterChatham, NJ 4 of 5Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMadison, TN 4 of 5Gallatin Center For Rehabilitation And HealingGallatin, TN 4 of 5Legacy At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 4 of 5Manchester Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LManchester, TN 4 of 5St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterSt James, NY 5 of 5Cortlandt HealthcareCortlandt Manor, NY 5 of 5Lebanon Center For Rehabilitation And Healing, LLCLebanon, TN 5 of 5Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills PondSt James, NY 5 of 5Palmetto Subacute Care CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSayville, NY 5 of 5The Chateau At Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Enclave At Rye Rehab And Nursing CtrPort Chester, NY 5 of 5The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center atNesconset, NY 5 of 5The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The RiversideNew York, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
M PINES HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/02/2022
MD FRIEDMAN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF41%since 01/01/2023
YZH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 01/01/2023
EINHORN, NEALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2023
FRIEDMAN, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
HERBERT, ORLINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2025
MOLINA, FRANCISCOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2025
SONTAG, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2025
NEAL EINHORN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.2M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 12%Other / private 33%

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,941per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105089. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next