No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Grove At Valhalla Rehab And Nursing Center

61 Grasslands Road, Valhalla, NY 10595 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (914) 681-8400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (914) 681-8400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Grasslands Road · (914) 367-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8 Westchester Plz Ste 195 · (914) 592-1630 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ShopRite1.2 mi
320 Saw Mill River Rd · (914) 504-8910 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.1%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.3%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.3%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.1%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.4%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.4%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.9%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.8%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.2%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.801.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 418 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.61U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 239 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.4%CMS range 54.2–63.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.8–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting84.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.5–8.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
62.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 153.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey from 09/23/2025-09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Specifically, the minimum staffing levels did not meet the needs of the residents and residents, family, and staff expressed concerns about low staffing and delays in receiving care.Findings include:The Facility Assessment tool dated 8/5/25 documented there were 160 beds total in the facility and 4 units where residents reside. The minimum staffing levels for Direct Care Staff were documented as for:- the7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift, one (1) Registered or Licensed Practical Nurse and 3 Certified Nurse Aides on each of the 4 units (for a total minimum of 12 Certified Nurse Aides for 160 residents). - the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift, one (1) Registered or Licensed Practical Nurse and three (3) Certified Nurse Aides for the 1 North and 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) the daily refrigerator/freezer logs had missing temperature, 2) the kitchen refrigerators and spice/seasoning areas contained food items that were expired or were not documented with date opened, use by date or expiration dates, 3) the Unit resident refrigerators contained food products that were not labelled with resident name, bought into facility date and dispose by date, and 4) the dry storage pantry contained food products that did not contain date opened or expiration dates. The findings included: The facility policy titled Food Storage dated 10/2024, documented: All stock must be rotated with each new order received. Good should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. Date marking to indicate the date or day by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the rectification survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received contact information for the New York State Department of Health in a format and language they could understand for seven residents (Resident #42, #48, #49, #54, #96, #118, and #173) at the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, the New York State Department of Health contact information was not posted in a format understood by the Resident Council members.The findings are: On 09/24/2025 at 11:15 AM, Residents #42, #48, #49, #54, #96, #118, and #173 attended the Resident Council meeting and unanimously reported they did not know the contact information for the New York State Department of Health Complaint Intake Unit. At 12:00 PM, after conclusion of the council meeting, observations were made of resident common areas on each unit and in the facility front lobby and the New York State Department of Health Complaint Intake Unit contact information was not observed posted in a way accessible and legible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (#2575165) survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free of abuse. This was evident for two (Resident #8 and #118) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, 1) Resident #8 reported Resident #14 wandered into their room and touched their leg. There was no evidence the facility developed a plan to prevent further potential abuse of Resident #8 by Resident #14; and 2) Resident #14, who had a known history of wandering and resident-to-resident altercations, wandered into Resident #118's room at night. Resident #118 injured their left elbow trying to remove Resident #14 from their room. As a result, Resident #118 reported being fearful and began closing their door at night to prevent Resident #14 from wandering into their room.The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, an odor of urine was observed in Resident #14's room and coming from their mattress. The findings are: The facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces dated 06/02/2025 documented non-critical environmental surfaces can be decontaminated where they are used. On 09/25/2025 at 11:25 AM, Resident #14's room was observed with a strong odor of stale urine and body odor. The odor appeared strongest near the resident's bare mattress. On 09/26/2025 at 5:20 PM, Resident #14's room was observed with a strong odor of urine without Resident #14 present in the room. On 09/30/2025 at 2:17 PM, the Administrator was interviewed and stated the former Housekeeping Director left a few weeks ago and the Administrator was currently covering.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00335938) from 9/23/2025 to 9/30/2025, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours to the state survey agency and the results of an alleged abuse investigation was reported to the state survey agency within five (5) working days of the incident for one (1)(Resident #170) of 20 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 3/12/2024, Resident #170 alleged their hands were held by a registered nurse during a medication administration. The facility reported the incident to the New York State Department of Health on 3/13/2024 at 5:49 PM and the 5-day investigative conclusion submission was not submitted until 04/25/2024. The findings are:The facility policy titled Abuse Reporting Instructions dated 01/25/2025 documents that the facility notify the appropriate agencies within two (2) hours of an allegation involving abuse and provide a written report of the findings of the investigation within five (5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00335938/647446) from 9/23/2025 to 9/30/2025, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of an alleged violation of abuse to prevent further potential abuse for one (1) (Resident #170) of 20 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 3/12/2024, Resident #170 alleged their hands were held by a Registered Nurse #12 during a medication administration and the facility did not complete a thorough investigation resolve inconsistencies and to rule out abuse.The findings are:The facility policy titled Abuse Reporting Instructions dated 01/25/2025 documents that the facility is to review all events leading up to the alleged incident and document the investigation completely and thoroughly. The facility policy titled Abuse Reporting Investigation dated 01/25/2025 documents that all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin) are to thoroughly be investigated by facility management. The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum is to review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 09/23/25 through 09/30/25, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary assistance for bathing to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #114), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, Resident #114 did not receive twice weekly showers as scheduled. Findings include:The facility policy dated 1/4/25 titled Activities of Daily Living Support and Functioning documented residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services designed to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), in accordance with their individualized care plans and assessed needs.Residents who are unable to perform ADLs independently will receive the necessary support to maintain optimal levels of nutrition, grooming, personal hygiene, and oral care, in line with their rights, preferences, and clinical conditions.Resident # 114 had diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, hypertension, and heart disease. The residents Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing. This was evident for 1 of 1residents (Resident #8) during review of communication. Specifically, nursing staff were unable to locate Resident #8's hearing aids after taking possession to charge and safekeep them for the resident overnight.The findings are: Resident #8had diagnoses of congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #8 had minimal difficulty hearing and was cognitively intact. The Physician Orders dated 01/11/2024 documented Resident #8's hearing aids be applied in the morning and placed on their charger when removed every evening. The Audiology Consult dated 06/30/2025 documented Resident #8 received new hearing aids that facility staff must apply daily and remove for charging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (#2575165) surveys from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident diagnosed with dementia, received treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable well-being. This was evident one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, Resident #14 presented with adjustment difficulties after their room was changed to address their dementia behaviors; and a recommended follow-up neurology consult was not scheduled for Resident #14 following a hospitalization due to a change in their mental status. The findings are: The facility policy titled Dementia Care dated 01/06/2025 documented the physician and staff will identify to the extent possible the neurological basis of the resident's dementia. The interdisciplinary team will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize quality of life. Resident #14 had diagnoses of cerebral ischemia (reduced or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (#2575165) from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from unnecessary drugs. This was evident for one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, Resident #14 was ordered to receive Haldol 2 milligrams without a labeled indication and without consideration of recommendations by Psychiatry to decrease the dosage.The findings are: The facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 08/02/2025 documented residents who have not used psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given these medications unless necessary to treat a specific condition that is diagnosed and the is based on a comprehensive resident review that evaluates underlying causes. Resident #14 had diagnoses of cerebral ischemia (reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain), dementia without behavioral disturbance, and psychosis. The Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 09/23/2025 to 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure special eating equipment and utensils for a resident who need them was provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for adaptive equipment. Specifically, built up utensils were not provided for Resident #3 as per physician order. The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Adaptive Equipment dated 08/02/25 documented the purpose was to ensure that residents receive the appropriate adaptive equipment and staff members are trained in its proper use. The residents need for adaptive equipment should be assessed and evaluated by a qualified rehabilitation therapist. Following the assessment, the rehabilitation therapist should prescribe the specific equipment required. The responsible staff should promptly place an order, care plan and appropriate task for the adaptive equipment with the supplier, vendor.Resident #3 had diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus and Muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/25 to 09/30/25, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, staff were observed transferring Resident #12 from the bed to chair in a lift and not wearing the required personal protective equipment for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings include: The facility policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 08/05/25 documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi drug resistant organisms to residents. Enhanced Barrier Precautions employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities. Examples of high contact resident care activities requiring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00332525), the facility did not ensure that a resident's Care Plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's changing needs and current status as evidenced by 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin impairment. Specifically, Resident #1 acquired two pressure injuries on the buttocks and the care plan was not updated to reflect the goals and interventions to promote wound healing. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revision date March 2022 documented 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Fracture of unspecified part of neck left femur, malignant neoplasm of prostate, Parkinson w/o dyskinesia and cognitive communication deficit. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 12/18/2023 documented that the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00320442), the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided and that the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, on 07/19/2023 Certified Nursing Assistant (Staff #1) served Resident #1 (who required 1-person assistance for eating) rewarmed coffee from the microwave without assistance/setup. Resident #1 poured milk into the coffee and the coffee spilled onto their skin causing a blistering burn, measuring 3x3 inches to the right thigh. The findings are: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Fracture of Second Thoracic Vertebra, Wedge Compression Fracture and Malignant Neoplasm of Colon. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 07/12/2023 documented that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, used to determine attention, orientation, and ability to recall information) score of 14/15, associated with intact cognitive. Resident #1 required supervision and setup help only with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during a recertification survey 3/22/2023-03/30/2023, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for one of two residents screened for dignity. Specifically, Resident #66 was observed their Foley catheter (tube draining urine from the bladder) bag uncovered with urine visible to staff, residents, and visitors. The findings are: Resident #66 was admitted with diagnoses including Thrombocytopenia, repeated falls, Hyperlipidemia, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and on 3/21/2023 was readmitted after a fracture of right femur. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 03/07/2023 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and needed extensive assist of one person with bed mobility, transfer, dressing and toileting. Resident #66 was observed from the hallway on 3/22/23 at 10:47 AM, 12:46PM and 03:11PM, and on 03/23/2023 at 09:40 AM, in bed with the Foley bag positioned on the bed hanging near the lower edge of bed with urine in the tubing and bag, visible to passers by.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 3/22/23 to 3/30/23, the facility failed to ensure that housekeeping and maintenance services provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Environment (Resident #2). Specifically, a window unit AC (air conditioner) was observed to be in disrepair in the room of Resident #2. An observation was made on 03/22/23 at 10:00 AM, in Resident #2's room, of a window unit AC with visible gaps of approximately 1 centimeter to the outdoors on both sides of the unit. The gaps appeared to have been previously covered with duct tape, which was hanging off the bottom of both sides of the AC, and cold air was noted to be blowing through the gaps. A facility inspection sticker was observed on the left side of the AC unit with no date or initials to indicate that it had been inspected prior to use in a resident room. A facility policy titled 'Nonpatient Electrical Appliances and Equipment', last reviewed 10/2022, stated any equipment that appeared to not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 3/22/23 to 3/30/23, the facility failed to ensure the resident or the resident's representative were notified in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language they understood and failed to notify the Ombudsman for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for hospitalizations. Specifically, Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and the facility could not provide evidence a written notice of transfer/discharge was provided to the resident or the resident's representatives, or that notification was sent to the Ombudsman. The Findings Include: A review of the facility policy, 'Transfer or Discharge Notice', last reviewed 11/30/22 documented the residents and/or representatives were notified in writing, in a language and format they understand, at least thirty (30) days prior to a transfer or discharge and in the event of an immediate transfer or discharge for urgent medical needs, notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 3/22/23 through 3/30/23 and an abbreviated survey (#NY00296823), it was determined that for 2 of 2 residents (#2 and #494) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to ensure that the resident or the resident's representatives were notified in writing of the facility's Bed Hold Policy. Specifically, Resident #2 and Resident #494 were transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that a written notice of the facility's Bed Hold Policy was provided to the residents or the resident's representatives. The findings include: A review of the undated facility policy 'Bed-Holds and Returns', documented that the facility would provide information about the bed hold and payment amount to the resident or resident's representative before transfer to the hospital. 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to lumbar spina bifida with hydrocephalus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 3/22/23 through 3/30/23, the facility failed to ensure the required Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) was conducted within the regulatory time frames using the CMS-specified (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) resident assessment instrument process. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (Resident #86). The findings are: The MDS records of the following resident were reviewed and revealed that Quarterly assessments were not completed within the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) plus 14 days or 92 days from the last Quarterly Assessment. Resident #86's most recent Quarterly MDS assessment was last completed on 11/11/22 with an ARD date of 2/11/23. Resident #86's Quarterly MDS was not submitted until 3/24/23. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 1:08 PM, RN #1 (The Registered Nurse MDS Coordinator) stated quarterly MDS assessments should be completed and submitted for residents every 90 days. RN #1 stated the quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00296823, NY00307253) from 3/22/2023 to 3/30/2023, the facility did not develop and/or implement comprehensive person-centered care plans to ensure the services were provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for 5 of 7 residents (#38, #66, #114, #344, #494) reviewed for Care Plans. Specifically, Resident #38's plan for weekly weights was not implemented;Resident #23 had diagnosis of thyroid disorder and no care plan to address the thyroid disorder; Resident #114 was not provided assistance with eating as planned, Resident #344 did not have a care plan for the presence of actual pressure ulcers, and Resident # 494 did not have a care plan for risk for pressure ulcers. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled, Care Plans dated 11/30/2022, documented the interdisciplinary team was responsible for the development of resident care plans. Resident's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey, dated 3/22/2023-3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary assistance to maintain good nutrition for one (Resident #114) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Specifically, Resident # 114 was not provided assistance with meals as planned. The findings are: Review of the 11/30/2022 Policy and Procedure for Activities of Daily Living documented residents would be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (CVA, stroke) with right sided hemiplegia (paralysis), and a history of hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey initiated on 3/22/2023 and completed on 3/30/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #23) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #23's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed 13 administration omissions within 14 days. The findings are: Resident # 23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Congestive Heart Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, and Thyroid Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a resident assessment tool) dated 3/8/2023 documented: A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 6 which indicated severe impairment of cognitive abilities, and a Mood severity score of 00 which indicated no symptom presence. Received antianxiety medication, a diuretic, an antidepressant and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey 3/22/2023-3/30/2023, it was determined that the facility did not ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Specifically, space heaters were observed in resident rooms #270 and #271. Findings include: A review of the policy and procedure dated 1/18/2022, Use of Portable Space-Heating Devices documented portable space-heating devices shall only be used in-accordance with regulations and only temporarily. During observations on 03/22/2023 at 9:31 AM and 3/23/2023 at 9:00 AM, portable electric space heaters were observed in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on the floor with no visible sticker to demonstrate that they were checked by maintenance. During an interviews with the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 03/24/2023 at 10:10 AM and 03/28/2023 at 10:10 AM, the resident stated they reported being cold and the facility provided the heater. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey 3/22/23-3/30/23, it was determined for 1 of 7 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for Nutrition and Hydration, the facility did not ensure the resident was provided the necessary care to maintain, to the extent possible, acceptable body weight. Specifically, for Resident #38 weekly weight monitoring was not implemented as ordered. The findings are: The facility policy for Management and Prevention of Significant Weight Loss, dated 9/20/22, documented there was a systematic and interdisciplinary approach to monitoring resident weights in the facility. The nursing staff would weigh all residents on weekly upon admission for 4 weeks, then monthly unless a physician's order stated otherwise. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Dementia, Psychotic disturbance, Mood disorder, Anxiety, and was out of the facility 12/15/22-12/20/22 for repair of left hip fracture. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that personnel handled, stored, processed, and transported linens in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically, a housekeeper was observed distributing linens in an unclean manner and from an uncovered linen cart. The findings are: The undated facility policy for Linen and Personal Clothing Handling and Storage documented clean linen and personal clothing for distribution should always be placed on a clean cart and kept covered during transit. Personnel were to avoid all unnecessary contact with clean linen and personal clothing. On 3/22/23 11:19 AM an observation was made of Housekeeper #1 distributing clothing on the 2 North unit. Housekeeper #1 collected clean clothing from the linen cart, held linen pressed against their abdomen and brought articles of clothing into room [ROOM NUMBER]B. Housekeeper #1 continued to distribute clean linen from an uncovered linen cart to rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Housekeeper #1 then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure specicific food items were maintained in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, opened and outdated potentially hazardous foods (meat, fish, eggs and dairy products) were observed in one of the refrigerators. The findings are: The initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 8/13/19 at 9:40 AM. The following items were observed in a refrigerated unit: -An opened box of defrosted bay flounder fillets with 2 dates on the packaging, 8/7/19 and 8/9/19 (4 or 6 days since being opened). -An opened package containing approximately two and a half pounds of uncooked ground beef, dated 8/10/19 (3 days since being opened). The Food Service Director (FSD) was interviewed at that time and could not say which date the flounder had been opened or when it should be used. The FSD then proceeded to check the facility guidance chart for storage of defrosted/opened fish and opened uncooked ground beef and could not find any guidance. In a follow up interview conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recent recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility is adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area for 3 of 3 occupied resident bathrooms, 211, 234, and 240. The findings are: Observation on 8/15/19 from 11:29am through 1:28pm of residents' rooms 211, 234 and 240 was conducted and it was noted that the emergency call balls in the bathrooms were not functioning upon testing. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 was interviewed on 8/15/19 during the time of the above observation and stated that she was not aware of the bells malfunctioning. CNA #4 then reported that malfunctioning call bells are verbally reported to a nurse who would in turn document the information in the computer or report it to the maintenance worker directly. Additional observation was conducted of rooms 211, 234 and 240 on 8/19/19 between 11:39AM and 12PM, in the presence of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident was implemented. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #47 had a Physician's (MD) order for a 1000 cc fluid restriction in 24 hours which was not consistently implemented. The findings are: Resident #47 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, renal dialysis and hypertension. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool) dated 8/8/19 documented the resident was cognitively intact for decision making, received a therapeutic diet, and received dialysis. The MD order dated 7/5/19 documented a fluid restriction of 1000 cc in 24 hrs. distributed at: 1. Dietary : 600 cc/day 2. Nursing 400 cc/day. On 7 AM-3 PM shift medication pass: 160 cc/day. On 3 PM-11PM shift medication pass: 120 cc/day. On 11 PM -7 AM shift medication pass: 120 cc/day. The Comprehensive Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that necessary assistance and care were provided to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). This was evident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 48). The findings are: Resident #48 was admitted with diagnoses including; Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Accident and Huntington's Disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment and screening tool) of 3/24/19 documented that the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, personal hygiene and dressing. The ADL Care Plan initiated on 3/16/18 and updated on 8/2/19 had interventions that included but were not limited to; monitor for changes in status, notify interdisciplinary team as needed, therapy per orders. Multiple resident observations were made throughout the survey and the following were observed: 08/15/19 09:33 AM resident was observed in bed with untrimmed nails. 08/19/19 02:10 PM resident was observed in her wheelchair and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident received the necessary treatment to meet skin care needs. Specifically, 1 resident (Resident # 39) reviewed for non-pressure-related skin issues did not receive the treatment prescribed by a Dermatologist. The findings are: Resident #39 had diagnoses and conditions including; Diabetes Mellitus, Xerosis and Pruritis. According to the 4/19/19 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status ( BIMS; a test for cognitive functioning) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated mild cognitive impairment. Physician's Orders dated 8/13/19 had instructions for Eucerin Cream (skin protectant) to be applied to both arms two times a day for Xerosis and Pruritis for 6 weeks. [NAME] Sensitive Lotion 1 % to be applied to both arms topically two times a day for Xerosis and Pruritis for 6 weeks. Physician's Orders revealed both treatments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recertified survey, the facility did not ensure that facility staff followed proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 99) reviewed for pressure ulcer, and during a random room observation on 1 North and 2 North units. The findings are: 1. Resident # 99 has diagnoses and condition not limited to Hypertension, Chronic Kidney failure, and Pressure Ulcer. According to the 7/23/19 60-day Minimum Data Set ( MDS; an assessment instrument), the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcer. An 8/15/19 Pressure Ulcer/Potential for Pressure Ulcer Care Plan documented the resident has a stage 3 coccyx wound. Interventions included wound consult, air mattress, and documentation of wound assessment. The Physician Orders dated 8/13/19 had an order to apply Silver Sulfadiazine 1 % cream to coccyx wound twice a day. A wound observation was conducted on 8/16/19 at 11:40AM on the 1 North Unit and the following was observed: 1) The Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARERITE CENTERS — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 1 of 5Quality Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCLebanon, TN 2 of 5Nashville Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LlNashville, TN 2 of 5Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterYonkers, NY 2 of 5The Paramount At Somers Rehab And Nursing CenterSomers, NY 2 of 5Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation aPort Jefferson, NY 3 of 5Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLCMiami, FL 3 of 5Encore At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Glengariff Health Care CenterGlen Cove, NY 3 of 5Green Hills Center For Rehabilitation And HealingNashville, TN 3 of 5Pearl At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5Savoy At Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation And NursinFort Lauderdale, FL 3 of 5The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterPeekskill, NY 3 of 5The Grand Pavilion For Rehab & Nursing at RockvillRockville Centre, NY 3 of 5The Willows At Ramapo Rehab And Nursing CenterSuffern, NY 3 of 5Trevecca Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LLCNashville, TN 4 of 5Chatham Hills Subacute Care CenterChatham, NJ 4 of 5Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMadison, TN 4 of 5Gallatin Center For Rehabilitation And HealingGallatin, TN 4 of 5Legacy At Boca Raton Rehabilitation And Nursing CeBoca Raton, FL 4 of 5Manchester Center For Rehabilitation And Healing LManchester, TN 4 of 5St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterSt James, NY 5 of 5Cortlandt HealthcareCortlandt Manor, NY 5 of 5Lebanon Center For Rehabilitation And Healing, LLCLebanon, TN 5 of 5Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills PondSt James, NY 5 of 5Palmetto Subacute Care CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSayville, NY 5 of 5The Chateau At Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Enclave At Rye Rehab And Nursing CtrPort Chester, NY 5 of 5The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center atNesconset, NY 5 of 5The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 5 of 5The RiversideNew York, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EINHORN, SHARONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/01/2014
FRIEDMAN, DEVORAHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY25%since 12/01/2014
LANDA, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY50%since 12/01/2014
PALEKAR, SHEKHARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2023
PITOGO, MARIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2024
THOMAS, SOUMYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$30.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$7.9M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 30%Other / private 23%

This home reported $7.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$564per resident / day
operating cost
$17,135per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$551per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335809. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next