Golfcrest Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 59.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.48 to 1.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional assessments and interventions in a timely manner which resulted in significant weight loss for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #51); The facility also failed to follow tube feeding Physician's orders for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #167 and Resident #169). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Weighing and Weight at-risk Protocol and revised in March 2020 showed the following: Weights: Nursing to complete all weights with reweights on the following parameters: 0-175 pounds - variances of 4 pounds - loss or gain. Identification: When all weights (weekly and monthly) are completed, the Dietary Department will review weights for significant weight loss and at risk weight loss and determine variances with reweights as noted above. The Dietary Department will notify nursing staff of significant and at risk residents the next day during the morning meeting. Investigation: The Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely order to obtain and document proper admission physician orders for immediate care involving surgical site and Foley catheter care, and for pain medication for a resident; re-assess and document a resident's pain level; and administer routinely ordered medications to a resident, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for admission orders after surgery, Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Pain Observation and Record, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed April 21, 2021, documented in the Policy Statement: Pain Observation and Record UDA will be completed on every resident as part of the admission process. Pain will be re-observed and recorded any time a resident states that his/her pain level has changed/when pain medication or dosage is changed, or anytime the resident's condition significantly changes. Purpose: The management of pain is essential to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights are within reach for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Residents #2 and #10). The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Osteoarthritis Left Knee, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side, Pain and Muscle Weakness (Generalized). The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, indicating a cognitive response. On 04/07/25 at 9:15 AM an observation was made of Resident #10 sitting up in bed with the call light draped behind the head of the bed and out of the reach of the resident. On 04/07/25 at 11:15 AM an observation was made of Resident #10 being assisted by a staff member while in bed. The call light continued to be in the same place, draped over the head of the bed and inaccessible to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents have a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 6 of 27 resident rooms observed in the facility. The findings included: 1). On 04/07/25 at 9:20 AM an observation made in room [ROOM NUMBER] A revealed the following: *The wall behind the bed, was noted to be unsmooth and peeling paint. *The standing fan across from the resident's bed was covered with dust and debris. 2). On 04/07/25 at 11:30 AM an observation made in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an uncovered fluorescent bulb in the entryway, inside of the room. 3). On 04/07/25 at 11:40 AM an observation made in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the following: * An uncovered fluorescent bulb in the entryway, inside of the room. * The A/C vents were covered with dust and debris. * The lightbulb in the bathroom was out. * Unpainted plaster on the bathroom wall, next to the soap dispenser *A leaky faucet in the bathroom sink. 4). On 04/07/25 at 11:30 AM an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident #37) and failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for psychotropic medication for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Mood/Behavior (Resident #59). The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Muscle Weakness, and Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #37 revealed an order dated 04/04/25 for sacrum pressure ulcer stage 1 cleanse with normal saline (N/S), pat dry, apply calcium alginate daily and PRN (as needed)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1) promptly notify the ordering physician and promptly administer oral Antibiotics to a resident, in a timely manner, for a resident with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #16); and, 2) failed to accurately document and assess the status and condition for a resident with a skin condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2). The findings included: 1) Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled General Laboratory Information provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed 2024, documented in the Policy Statement: Communicating Urgent Results Notification will be provided to the Principal Investigator, Physician, or his/her authorized representative, as permitted or required by state and federal law, and these authorized personnel will have the responsibility of interpreting the result (s) in the context of the patient's clinical condition. The authorized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #37). The findings included: Record review for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Muscle Weakness, and Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #37 revealed in part the following orders: *An order dated 02/06/24 Weekly skin assessment every Tuesday 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Shift. *An order dated 04/04/25 for sacrum pressure ulcer stage 1 cleanse with normal saline (N/S), pat dry, apply calcium alginate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of side effects and behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication (Resident #1); for 1 of 1 resident sampled residents reviewed for Mood/Behavior (Resident # 59); and failed to ensure adequate monitoring of side effects of residents prescribed anticoagulants (blood thinner) for 1 of 1 sampled residents reveiwed for Unnecessary Medications (Resident #45). The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, the following: Degenerative Disease of Nervous System Unspecified, Pain, Restless Agitation, and Depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status could not be done due to the resident is rarely/never understood. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #59 revealed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to wear or don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), preventing infection control, during high-contact resident care activity for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed for Indwelling Urinary Catheter, Resident #171. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed November 2019 documented in the Policy Statement: Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO) to staff hands and clothing Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Catheter Care, Urinary provided the DON reviewed July 2015 documented in the Policy Statement: This procedure may…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for potentially 55 of the facility's 61 residents. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 01/16/24 at 8:50 AM, and accompanied with the Food Service Director (FSD), the following were noted: a) Staff A was noted to be washing resident dishware in the facility dish machine. Staff A stated to the surveyor that the dish machine is at a low temperature and sanitizes by Chlorine chemical. The surveyor requested the FSD to test the final rinse chemical level. Following 3 separate Chlorine Strip tests, it was noted that there was presence of chemical in the final rinse water. The surveyor requested that the washing of resident dishware cease until the machine was properly sanitizing and to re-sanitize the washed dishes in the 3-compartment sink. A review of the chemical testing log noted that the level was checked for regulatory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the approved menu was not being followed that potentially affected 55 facility residents who eat orally, which included 11 of 11 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #7, #10, #17, #19, #33, #37, #39, #44, #45, #55, and #63). The findings included: 1) During the review of the approved facility menu for the lunch meal of 01/16/24, the following were noted: * Broccoli Florets (Alternative Lunch Vegetable and to be served to Dysphagia Advanced, Dysphagia Mechanical, and Dysphagia Pureed) * Pureed Vegetable Quiche (Dysphagia Pureed Diet) * Cheese Sauce (2 ounces to be served over Vegetable Quiche (Regular Diet, Dysphagia Pureed) * Snickerdoodle Cookie - 2 ounces- (Regular Diet) Observation of the lunch tray assembly line in the main kitchen on 01/16/24 at 11 AM accompanied with the FSD (Food Service Director) and Corporate FSD noted the following: -Broccoli Florets - not prepared and no alternative was prepared. During interview with the FSD it was revealed that the Broccoli was not delivered in time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$40,755 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $40,755 — penalty dated 2025-04-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL