No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Homestead Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

129 Morris Turnpike, Newton, NJ 07860 · For profit - Partnership · 128 certified beds · (973) 948-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jul 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$231,049 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $231,049 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
36 Lone Pine Trl · (973) 948-9929 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19 Main St · (973) 948-3170 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
29 Newton Halsey Rd · (973) 534-2248 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1 Rumsey Way · (973) 383-5508 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.4%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.532.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.201.111.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 252 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.5%CMS range 56.8–69.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 6.4–11.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.8–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
30.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 59.2 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-05-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #:3008822 and 3013216 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure their Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) a.) maintained the facility in a safe operable condition including maintaining and testing their fire sprinkler system; b.) ensured the administrator, as well as all staff, implemented facility policies and procedures including conducting a fire watch accurately; c.) and ensured all local and state officials were notified that the facility's fire sprinkler system was in-operable since [DATE]. An interview with the LNHA on [DATE] at 4:38 PM, revealed that the facility's fire sprinkler system was in-operable and he was only made aware of it on [DATE]. When asked, the LNHA stated that he called the New Jersey Department of Health's (NJDOH) hotline on [DATE] and [DATE], to report the in-operable system, but there was no record of the calls. An interview with the facility's Maintenance Director (MD) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #s: NJ00182470, NJ00182480 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 03/26/2025 and 04/01/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to (a) provide a safe environment for a wandering, ambulatory, and cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) and (b) follow facility policy on thorough investigation of accident/incident. On 10/15/2024 Resident #1 was found stuck to the floor in an opened room where the floor was being redone. Resident #1 was found by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) when she/he fell backwards and hit her/his head hard and started vomiting which resulted in Resident #1 being sent out to an acute care hospital #1[name] ER [emergency room] and later was transferred to acute hospital #2 [name] where she/he was found to have three (3) brain bleeds. Resident #1 was not in the facility during the survey. The Surveyor reviewed the closed medical records of Resident #1. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 6 residents reviewed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0711 — widespread
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents completed monthly progress notes. This deficient practice continued over several months for 9 of 11 residents reviewed, Resident #2, #4, #7, #8, #10, #11, #39, #59, and #67 reviewed for physician progress notes.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. On 7/16/24 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #8's hybrid medical records (combination of electronic and paper chart).Review of Resident #8's admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism and hypertension. Review of the Medical Progress Notes (PN) written by Physician #1(MD#1), from 4/23/25 to 6/20/25 were held in DRAFT by MD#1 documenting a letter (Z) to keep the place. No other information was evidenced in the Medical PN. 2. On 7/16/24 at 11:00 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of Nurse Staffing Report sheets, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked seven days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 5 of 14 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/16/25 at 10:29 AM, during the entrance conference, the surveyor requested the Nurse Staffing Report to be completed for the following weeks: 6/29/25 through 7/5/25; 7/6/25 through 7/12/25 and 3/2/25 through 3/8/25.The surveyor reviewed the Nursing Staffing Reports, which revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) to work eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 1. No RN on 7/4/25; the last RN was scheduled on 7/3/25 2. No RN on 7/5/25; the last RN was scheduled on 7/3/25 3. No RN on 7/6/25; the last RN was scheduled on 7/3/25 4. No RN on 7/9/25; the last RN was scheduled on 7/8/25 5. No RN on 7/10/25; the last RN was scheduled on 7/8/25 A review of the corresponding nursing staff sheets verified the following: During the 7-3 shift on 7/3/25, there was an RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the performance of all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) on an annual basis. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 CNA's whose personnel records were reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 7/24/25 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed the personnel files for 5 CNAs:1. CNA#1, with a date of hire of 8/17/22, no recent employee evaluation was completed.2. CNA#2, with a hire date of 8/23/23, no recent employee evaluation was completed.3. CNA#3, with a hire date of 7/2/24, no recent employee evaluation was completed.4. CNA#4, with a hire date of 10/1/24, no recent employee evaluation was completed.5. CNA#5, with a hire date of 7/22/23, no recent employee evaluation completedOn 7/24/25 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated that the facility does not have competencies for the CNAs. The DON stated that she had a stack of folders on her desk but was unable to provide the five employee evaluations or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve and document residents received a nourishing snack in the evening (HS) when there was more than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #15, #38, and #42) during the 7/21/25 resident council group meeting and evidenced by the following:On 07/21/2025 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor conducted the resident council meeting with three residents (Residents #15, #38 and #42) who were alert and oriented and selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. The residents stated that they received dinner between 5:00 PM-5:30 PM, and breakfast was delivered between 8:00 AM-8:30 AM. All three residents stated that they were not offered nor received snacks in the evening. On 7/21/25 at 12:40 PM, the survey team met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) to discuss the above observations and concerns. The LNHA stated that evening snacks were delivered to the units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness.This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following:On 7/16/2025 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the chef toured the kitchen and observed the following:1. In the 3-door standing refrigerator, the surveyor observed 10, 2oz cups of sliced pickles dated 7/7/25 -7/12/25 and 12, 2oz cups of grated cheese with a use by date of 7/15/25. The chef was unable to state why those items had not been disposed of by the use-by date. 2. In the 6-door standing refrigerator, the surveyor observed a round container of grape jelly covered with plastic wrap, labeled opened on 7/11/25. The chef was unable to explain why the label did not have a use-by date but stated that the jelly should have been discarded three days after opening. The surveyor also observed an open package of sliced American cheese without a label. The chef was unable to state when the American cheese was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the dumpster and surrounding area free of garbage and debris.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/16/2025 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the chef, toured the kitchen and garbage area and observed the following:There was garbage debris that included food wrappers, food containers, cups, gloves, paper products, and medication cups around the dumpster and surrounding areas. The chef said that the maintenance and dietary departments should have cleaned the area.On 7/17/2025 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD), who stated that the garbage areas are a shared area; the kitchen, maintenance, and housekeeping departments are all in charge of cleaning that area. On 7/21/25 at 12:36 PM, the FSD provided the surveyor with a facility policy titled Dumpster Sanitation Policy with a revised date of 4/1/25. Under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medical director: a.) implemented the facility's policies and procedures for resident care including physician visits documented at the time of visit and b.) ensure facility policies and procedures were reviewed and updated as needed. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, and was evidenced by the following:Refer F 711A review of the undated facility provided Director Roles and Responsibilities for the Medical Director's job description included:Physician Leadership: Help the facility ensure that patients have appropriate physician coverage and ensure the provision of physician and health care practitioner services.Provide guidance for physician performance expectations; Help the facility ensure that a system is in place for monitoring the performance of health care practitioners.Patient care-Clinical Leadership: Participate in administrative decision-making and the development of policies and procedures; Help develop, approve, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was being implemented to ensure sustainability with previously cited deficiencies. The facility was cited during last standard survey on 3/12/24, and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F686, F711, F755, F880 During the entrance conference on 7/16/24 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) a copy of the facility's QAPI program plan and the 2024 and 2025 quarterly sign-in sheets and QAPI notebook.On 07/21/2025 at 12:40 PM, the survey team met with the LNHA and DON to discuss their concerns, which included treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers, physician visits, pharmacy services, and infection control.A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2567 statement of deficiencies from the facility's last standard survey included the facility was cited for the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) received at least 12 hours of mandatory in-service training for 5 of 5 CNA's education reviewed, (CNA#1, CNA#2, CNA#3, CNA#4, and CNA#5).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/24/25 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor requested the personnel education files for 5 CNA's1. CNA#1, with a date of hire of 8/17/22 no record of education was provided.2. CNA#2, with a hire date of 8/23/23 no record of education was provided.3. CNA#3, with a hire date of 7/2/24 no record of education was provided.4. CNA#4, with a hire date of 10/1/24 no record of education was provided.5. CNA#5, with a hire date of 7/22/23 no record of education was provided.On 7/21/25 at 12:20 PM, the survey requested CNA education from the Director of Nursing (DON).On 7/24/25 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor interviewed the DON, who stated that she could not provide any staff education including the CNA's 12-hour mandatory education. She stated that the program used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner on 1 of 3 Nursing Units (Unit 3). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/21/25 at 11:25 AM, during a tour of the 3rd floor nursing unit, the surveyor observed cracked floor tiles and chipped paint throughout the unit on the low and high sides. The surveyor also observed soiled and cracked ceiling tiles on the low side near the elevator.On 7/22/25 at 10:40 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Maintenance acknowledged that the floor, paint, and ceiling tiles were all in disrepair.On 7/22/25 at 1:15 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated that he was aware of the cracked flooring, chipped paint, and soiled ceiling tiles on the 3rd floor Nursing Unit. The LNHA stated that the last contractor was in the middle of repairs and then left abruptly. The LNHA stated that the facility needed a new roof, and as a result, the tiles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ Complaint#: NJ0018771Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse between Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) and Resident #29 that occurred on 2/2/25 and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) that appeared intoxicated when reporting to work on 7/2/25. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 reported complaints reviewed.On 6/26/25 the NJDOH received an anonymous complaint from an employee of Homestead Rehabilitation and Health care Center. The employee claimed there was an issue with quality of care specifically citing, an allegation of staff to resident abuse from a CNA (name detached) which had resulted in injury as well as a nurse being intoxicated when reporting to work.On 7/17/25 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed the employee files for CNA#1 and LPN#1. A review of CNA#1's employee file revealed a Facility Reported Incident dated 5/23/25 at 3:00 PM revealed a staff member reported to the Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ184361 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for a resident's skin integrity. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #67), and was evidenced by the following:The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #67. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and major depressive disorder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/11/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicated a severely impaired cognition. A further review revealed that the resident needed partial assistance from another person to complete activities of daily living (ADLs).A review of the individualized comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance for bathing received a shower upon admission to the facility and on their scheduled shower day. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #67), and was evidenced by the following:The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #67. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and major depressive disorder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/11/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicated a severely impaired cognition. A further review revealed that the resident needed partial assistance from another person to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures during wound care treatment for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care and services for pressure ulcers.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to (a) ensure that a medication was administered according to the physician orders (PO) and acceptable standards of practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing and (b) ensure a system was in place for the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of medications in accordance to professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (two) of 4 (four) residents (Resident #33 and Resident #42) observed during the medication observation pass and had the potential to affect all residents. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #67.A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and major depressive disorder.A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated [DATE], reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicated a severely impaired cognition. A further review revealed that the resident needed partial assistance from another person to complete activities of daily living (ADLs).A review of the individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area dated effective [DATE], for requiring increased assistance with ADL function due to debility due to recent hospitalization, impaired mobility, cognitive deficit with poor safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) develop and maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included all of the required elements, the facility failed to review the IPCP policy on an annual basis b.) failed to follow infection control procedures with 2 of 3 residents on Oxygen (O2) Therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #4 and #8) reviewed for O2 therapy.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.The Surveyor reviewed the facility's IPCP policy which reflected that the policy did not include A system of surveillance which is designed to identify possible infections before they spread to other residents in the facility; who possible infections should be reported to; and failed to document the requirements for the isolation of a resident. A review of the facility's IPCP policy reflected that it was last reviewed January 2024. On 7/24/25 at 10:15 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure handrails were secure and intact on 1 of 2 resident units (observed on 3rd floor nursing unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 07/21/25 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor was observing medication administration pass on the 3rd floor low-side and observed two handrails that were missing the return part (end part of the handrail) which was located next to room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The missing return part of the handrail exposed a screw and metal components that attached the handrail to the wall.On 07/22/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor interviewed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) on the 3rd floor low side, who in the presence of the surveyor observed the handrail missing the return part. At that time, LPN#1 stated that the handrail that was missing the return part was a potential hazard to the resident's because it exposed the residents to a sharp object (screw…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #00174902; NJ00174912; NJ00174921 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable room temperature levels for residents in 2 of 3 nursing units (Second and Third Floor). This deficient practice was identified on 06/20/24 and was evidenced by the following: 1.On 06/20/24 at 9:51 a.m., the surveyor in the presence of the Maintenance Person (MP) checked the temperatures on the Second floor and the following were obtained: room [ROOM NUMBER] - room temperature of 82.4 degrees Fahrenheit; occupied; resident has a working desk fan; air conditioner (AC)/radiator working with low air coming out; resident not in distress. room [ROOM NUMBER] - room temperature of 83.3 degrees Fahrenheit; occupied; resident has a working desk fan; AC/radiator working with low air coming out; water pitcher at bedside; resident not in distress. room [ROOM NUMBER] - room temperature of 84.2 degrees Fahrenheit; occupied;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0711 — widespread
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents completed monthly progress notes . This deficient practice continued over several months for 15 of 16 residents reviewed, Resident #18, #19, #58, #117, #10, #20, #38, #56, #61, #64, #42, #50, #1, #12 and #16 reviewed for physician progress notes and current physician orders. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/07/24 at 10:41 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #18's hybrid medical records. Review of Resident #18's admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Sepsis, Major Depressive Disorder, Cirrhosis of Liver, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery with Unspecified Angina Pectoris Review of the Medical Progress Notes (PN) written by Physician #1, from 2/8/24 to 3/7/24 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices as well as store, label, and discard potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 3/4/24 at 09:25 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. During the kitchen inspection, the surveyor observed on the inside of the 3 door refrigerator, individual 2 ounce (oz) condiment cups with parmesan cheese without open or use by labels. The surveyor also observed a gallon of whole milk as well as a gallon of fat-free milk and a 1/2 gallon of 2% milk container, all opened without open or use by dates. The CDM explained that the facility goes by the expiration dates printed on the large containers of parmesan cheese and the use by dates on the milk containers to evaluate their freshness. The CMD agreed that all products when opened should have an open and use by date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interviews and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control and was qualified by certification and experience for 1 of 1 staff member reviewed in accordance with Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and New Jersey State guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health Executive Directive No 20-026-1 dated October 20, 2020, revealed the following: ii. Required Core Practices for Infection Prevention and Control: Facilities are required to have one or more individuals with training in infection prevention and control employed or contracted on a full-time basis or part-time basis to provide on-site management of the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) program. The requirements of this Directive may be fulfilled by: a. An individual certified by the Certification Board of Infection Control and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to decrease the possibility of spreading infection during medication administration and failed to ensure that the sharps container (SC) that were filled with contaminated sharps/needles were disposed properly, for 3 of 3 units reviewed for infection control practices. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: 1. On 3/7/23 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse # 2(LPN#2) perform a wound treatment to Resident #1. LPN #2 went to wash her hands at the sink in the resident's room after entering the resident's room. LPN #2 turned on the faucet, wet her hands with water from the sink, applied soap, lathered her hands for 16 seconds outside the running water prior to rinsing, dried her hands with a paper towel from the dispenser on the wall and used another paper towel to turn off the faucet. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity during mealtime for a resident who needed assistance with eating. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 5 second floor dining room residents reviewed, Resident #10 and Resident #24 and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/4/24 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 in the second floor dining room seated in a Broda chair (chair that provides safe, comfortable long-term seating that can reduce the number of falls for residents) being fed their lunch. The surveyor observed that the resident's hospice Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) was standing behind the resident while reaching over the resident's right side to feed them. The surveyor interviewed the hospice CNA on 3/4/24 at 12:21 PM who stated, she was aware that any staff should be seated in eye to eye level while feeding any resident. The hospice CNA further stated that it was not appropriate to stand while feeding. A review of the admission Record for Resident #10 revealed that the resident was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow acceptable standards of clinical practice for 1. not accurately documenting the resident's refusal of a medication, 2. not adequately documenting in the Administration Record to indicate that the daily weights were done according to physician's order (PO) to 2 of 16 residents reviewed, Resident #11 and Resident #18. This was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. 1. On 3/8/24 at 8:06 AM, the State Surveyor observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for pressure ulcer care and prevention. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/4/24 at 11:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 lying in bed in their room. Resident #1 was alert, verbally responsive, and conversant. Resident #1 stated they had a wound on their backside that was treated daily by the nurses and a wound doctor would visit weekly. On 3/7/24 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 provide wound treatment to Resident #1's sacral wound. LPN #2 provided the surveyor a copy of the resident's treatment order. The physician order dated 1/11/24 read, Cleanse Sacral Wound and R [right] Buttocks with NS [normal saline] apply Triad to peri wound Medihoney, to Calcium Alginate Cover with large foam dressing BID [two times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY An onsite revisit was conducted on 5/14/24 to verify the facility's plan of correction (POC) with a completion date of 3/28/24. The facility's POC indicated that the Director of Nursing (DON)/Designee will do a root cause analysis review on all incident and accidents reported after the completion of the incident/accident investigation to ensure that care plan (CP) will have an appropriate intervention monthly. Based on interview, record review, and review of the POC, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents who had a fall incident, were accurately investigated for falls root cause analysis. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, Resident #3. 1. On 5/14/24 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 in the hallway outside of their room in a wheelchair. The surveyor observed the resident's bed the lowest position with bed rails up and call light within reach. A review of the admission Record for Resident #3 revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure appropriate storage of oxygen (O2) equipment in accordance with facility and infection control policies, b) ensure a resident received oxygen as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified in 3 of 3 residents (Resident #11, #12 and #58), reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/4/24 at 11:14 AM, during the initial tour in Resident #11's room, the surveyor observed an oxygen tubing connected to the resident's tracheostomy and oxygen concentrator dated 2/7. The resident was observed with eyes closed with the tracheostomy in place. A review of the admission Record (AR) for Resident #11 reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to Chronic Respiratory failure with hypoxia; Respiratory Syncytial virus pneumonia; Sepsis and Anoxic brain damage. A review of the Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that narcotic medication shift to shift sign in and out sheet was accurately signed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 units inspected during the facility unit inspection process. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: On 3/4/24 at 1:00 PM, the State Surveyor inspected the 2nd floor medication Cart A. During the inspection the State Surveyor reviewed the Narcotic Inventory book. All Narcotics stored in the medication cart were in order and The Narcotic Count shift to shift sign in sheet was found to have empty areas. Review of the Narcotic Count Shift to Shift sign in sheet was found to lack nurse's signatures on 3/1/24 Outgoing Nurse 11:00 PM, 3/3/24 Incoming Nurse 3:00 PM and 3/4/24 Outgoing Nurse 11:00 PM. On 3/4/24 at 1:10 PM, the State Surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse (RN#1) who stated that the sheet should be signed by every incoming and outgoing nurse on each shift. The surveyor reviewed the Narcotics Accountability Policy with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. The surveyor observed 2 nurses administer 26 doses of medication to 3 residents and there were 3 errors which resulted in a medication error rate of 11.54 %. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/8/24 at 8:06 AM, the State Surveyor observed the start of medication pass with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) on the 3rd floor. 1. On 3/8/24 at 8:14 AM, LPN#1 administered Multi-Vitamin with Minerals to Resident #19. The surveyor noted that the computer screen reviewed by LPN#1 documented Multivitamin 50 Plus on the electronic medical administration record (eMAR). After Resident #19 medication administration was completed the surveyor interviewed LPN#1. LPN#1 stated that Multi-Vitamin with Minerals was the same as Multivitamin 50 Plus. Review of the March 2024 Physician's Order (PO) revealed an order for Multivitamin 50 Plus tablet that began on 2/9/24. On 3/8/24 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to properly store and refrigerate medication at the required temperature. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 2 facility units inspected during the initial facility unit inspection. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/4/24 at 1:00 PM, the State Surveyor accompanied by the RN#1 inspected the 2nd floor locked medication refrigerator located in the locked medication room. The thermometer located inside the refrigerator was found to be 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) upon inspection. The State Surveyor inspected the medication that was in the refrigerator at the time: 1. 17x10 milliliter (ml) Insulin Pens 2. 1x3.7 (ml) Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Spray 3. 3x2.5 ml Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% 4. 1x1ml Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Diluted Aplisol 5. 1x30 ml opened Lorazepam Intensil Oral Concentrate 2mg/ml 6. 1x30 ml sealed Lorazepam Intensil Oral Concentrate 2mg/ml Upon inspection all the medications seemed to be in good condition The State Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare vegetables in the proper consistency for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #5 and #36) reviewed on a modified diet. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/5/24 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed the lunch tray line. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) requested a mechanical soft diet tray (mechanical soft diet is a type of diet that involves foods that are physically soft, making them easier to eat without the need for extensive chewing), which contained three whole fish sticks, regular mixed vegetables (carrots, broccoli, and cauliflower) and mashed potatoes. The Surveyor interviewed the CDM in reference to the fish sticks and vegetables served whole for a mechanical soft diet. The CDM explained, they do serve mechanical soft residents whole fish stick and regular mixed vegetables because they are considered fork mash-able or fork tender. The CDM identified that the CNA or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to provide full visual privacy for 2 of 18 residents reviewed, Resident #72 and Resident #2. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/10/22 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed the Phlebotomist enter Resident # 72's room and he left the door opened. From the hallway, the surveyor observed the Phlebotomist set up his supplies and attempted to draw the resident's blood. There was no privacy afforded to the resident during this procedure. At 9:54 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Phlebotomist who stated that he should have provided privacy to the resident while performing blood draws for a resident. At 10:01 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse # 1 (LPN #1) who stated that the Phlebotomist should have provided privacy while doing blood draws. The surveyor received and reviewed the policy titled Residents Privacy dated 12-28-21, which revealed that during treatments and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify resident families or resident representatives (RR), and the Ombudsman's office in writing for a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #74 and #39) reviewed for hospitalization. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyors reviewed the hybrid medical records (paper and electronic) that revealed facility-initiated hospital transfers had occurred without written notification to the families and Ombudsman's office for the following residents: 1. According to the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 3/7/22, Resident #74 was transferred to the hospital with return not anticipated to the facility. There was no documentation that the facility had notified the resident's family or RR in writing regarding the reason for transfer and bed hold policy. On 5/9/22 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Social Worker (SW) who stated that she was new in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving oxygen therapy, Resident # 7, who was 1 of 21 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/4/22 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula (NC-plastic prongs attached to a tube, inserted into the nostrils that oxygen flows through) that was attached to an oxygen concentrator (an oxygen delivery system). The oxygen concentrator was set at 2 LPM (liters per minute). The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #7 which revealed the following: The Resident Face Sheet, which listed diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Acute Respiratory Failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/5/22, which indicated the facility assessed the resident's cognitive status using a Brief Interview for Mental Status. The resident scored a 10 out of 15 which indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice during a wound treatment. This was found with Resident #7, who was 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and prevention. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/9/22 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor spoke with Resident #7 who stated, I have a wound by the spine and that the nurses provided treatment to the wound. Resident #7 said, I think it's some type of cream they [nurses] put and they [nurses] say it's getting better. On 5/9/22 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor observed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) perform a wound treatment to the sacrum of Resident #7. The LPN applied Triad paste (a zinc-oxide-based topical paste) to the resident's wound. The LPN did not cleanse the wound site prior to applying the topical treatment. On 5/9/22 at 1:22 PM, the surveyor interviewed the LPN about the wound care procedure and the observation of the wound site not being cleansed prior to applying the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all DEA [Drug Enforcement Administration] 222 forms were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate accountability and reconciliation for controlled medications for 3 of 3 DEA FORM-222 provided. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/10/22 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the DEA 222 forms provided by the Administrator. The surveyor noted the following: 1. A DEA FORM-222 dated 3/9/22, which included an order for Hydromorphone 2 mg (milligrams) tablets, oxycodone/APAP 5/325 mg tablets, and morphine sulfate oral solution 20 mg/ml (milligram per milliliter). The number received for the order and the supplier DEA number was not documented on the form. 2. An undated DEA FORM-222, which included an order for Oxycontin 10 mg tablets, Oxycontin 15 mg tablets, oxycodone/APAP 5/325 mg tablets, and oxycodone IR (Immediate Release) 5 mg tablets. The number received and date received for the order and the supplier DEA number was not documented on the form. 3. A DEA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate measures to prevent and control the spread of infection for 1 of 1 Phlebotomist observed. This deficient practice was as evidenced by the following: On 5/10/22 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed the Phlebotomist enter Resident # 72's room and he left the door opened. From the hallway, the surveyor observed the Phlebotomist perform hand hygiene and put on gloves. With his gloved hands, the Phlebotomist grabbed the bedside table and pushed it away from the resident's bed. Then, with his gloved hands, the Phlebotomist picked up and moved the paperwork from the bedside table, pushed a button on the side of the resident's handrail to raise the bed up and grabbed his laboratory supplies from his rolling bag and placed them on the bed next to the resident. The surveyor observed the Phlebotomist, with his gloved hands place a tourniquet on the resident's arm and wiped the resident's skin with an alcohol preparation pad. The Phlebotomist inserted a needle into the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$231,049 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $119,295 — penalty dated 2026-05-15
  • $45,682 — penalty dated 2025-04-01
  • $66,072 — penalty dated 2024-03-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Christian Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePembroke, KY 1 of 5Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStaten Island, NY 1 of 5River Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPaducah, KY 1 of 5Salyersville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSalyersville, KY 1 of 5Silver Healthcare CenterCherry Hill, NJ 2 of 5Brookwood Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing CenteHomestead, FL 2 of 5Cumberland Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSomerset, KY 2 of 5Elizabethtown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElizabethtown, KY 2 of 5Golfview Nursing CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 2 of 5Southern Pines Nursing CenterNew Port Richey, FL 2 of 5The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing CeWoodmere, NY 2 of 5Westside Oaks Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Bay Breeze Rehabilitation By HarborviewGulf Breeze, FL 3 of 5Brookhaven Rehab & Health Care Center L L CFar Rockaway, NY 3 of 5Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFranklin, KY 3 of 5Golfcrest Nursing CenterHollywood, FL 3 of 5Hardinsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHardinsburg, KY 3 of 5Henderson Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHenderson, KY 3 of 5Ormond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBronx, NY 3 of 5Premier Nursing and Rehab Center of Far RockawayFar Rockaway, NY 3 of 5Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterStanton, KY 4 of 5Campbellsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCampbellsville, KY 4 of 5Fordsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFordsville, KY 4 of 5Graceville Rehabilitation By HarborviewGraceville, FL 4 of 5Grand Boulevard Health And Rehabilitation CenterMiramar Beach, FL 4 of 5Gulf Valor Rehabilitation By HarborviewPensacola, FL 4 of 5Irvine Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterIrvine, KY 4 of 5Marianna Nursing And Care CenterMarianna, FL 4 of 5Middleburg Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMiddleburg, FL 4 of 5Orange Park Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOrange Park, FL 4 of 5Specialty Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 4 of 5Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care CenterBrooklyn, NY 4 of 5Surrey Place Nursing CenterLive Oak, FL 4 of 5The Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation FacilityCampbellsville, KY 4 of 5Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElsmere, KY 5 of 5Arcadia Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 5 of 5Bayside Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 5 of 5Chautauqua Springs Health CenterDefuniak Springs, FL 5 of 5Eastchester Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterBronx, NY

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AM 145 HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 02/05/2016
JCANDL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/05/2016
PJ&H HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/05/2016
THE WHITE MAPLE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 02/05/2016
EGERT, DEBBIEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 02/05/2016
LERNER, URIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 02/05/2016
STERN, RONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 02/05/2016
MUELLER, CHAYAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/05/2016
LIGHTEN, JAKEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/30/2012
DACHS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/26/2012
EGERT, USHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/26/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 20%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$426per resident / day
operating cost
$12,964per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$376per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next