Southern Pines Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 26.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 93.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a known wandering resident resulting in an incident of potential sexual abuse for two residents (#8 and #9) out of three residents sampled. On 05/30/2026, facility staff became aware that Resident #9, who was cognitively impaired, had entered Resident #8's bed while both residents were fully unclothed. The facility did not implement immediate protective measures consistent with their policy. Findings included: On 06/24/2026 at 02:36 PM, Resident #9 was observed self propelling through D Hall without staff present. Resident #9 did not answer questions, and continued past her own room, and approached the threshold of another resident's room. At 02:48 PM the same day, Resident #9 was observed self propelling from the dining room toward the area between A Hall and B Hall, without staff supervision. During an interview on 06/24/2026 at 02:12 PM, Resident #8 stated that on 05/30/2026, Resident #9 came into his room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, sanitary, and homelike environment in four halls (A, B, C, D) of four hallways and one of one dining room. Findings included: The following observations were made on 6/11/25: - At 9:20 a.m. a treatment cart parked in the dining room beside the exit door to the courtyard. The cart was empty and unlocked, on top of the cart were crumbs of an unknown substance, a piece of black fabric, and the front of the cart was stained with brown and black substances, the cart appeared to be unclean and unsanitary. On the floor next to the cart was a piece of white paper and a plastic domed lid with a brown liquid attached to it. The floor surrounding the cart was unclean and scuffed. The observation revealed a white piece of paper and a clear piece of plastic against the wall opposite of where the cart was parked in the dining room. The floor was unclean. At the time of the observation no residents were eating a meal in the dining room. Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported being unsure how…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to performing weekly skin checks for four residents (#1, #3, #5, #6) out of five sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #3s admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the community on 3/13/25, residing at the facility for a total of 15 days. The record revealed diagnoses not limited to prediabetes, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #3s nursing assessments showed the resident was evaluated on 2/27/25 for an admission/readmission. The clinical record did not reveal a skin evaluation/check was completed during the fifteen days the resident resided at the facility. The admission/readmission evaluation revealed the resident had redness to buttocks. The progress notes did not reveal licensed nursing had completed a weekly skin evaluation/check for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The record included diagnoses not limited to other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified cord compression, and generalized muscle weakness. The resident discharged to a private home on 3/13/25. An interview was conducted on 6/11/25 at 1:57 p.m. with the Director of Rehab (DOR). The DOR stated all new admissions are evaluated or screened by therapy. The DOR reported remembering Resident #3 did participate in physical and occupational therapies. A review of the therapy notes for both disciplines revealed the resident did not miss any scheduled visits. Review of Resident #3's assessments did not reveal any Daily Skilled Nursing notes were completed for the resident.Review of Resident #3's progress notes showed no nursing notes had been completed after the residents' admission. The progress notes showed Physician/Practitioner notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the resident representative of a room change for one resident (#4) of three sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 04/16/2025. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to fracture of the left femur, history of falling, hypertension, anemia, urine retention, and weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 or moderately impaired. Review Resident #4's progress notes lacked any documentation regarding the room change that occurred on 04/09/2025 from room A2A to A5A. Review of a Social Services Director's (SSD) progress note read: On 04/11/2025 at 10:12 a.m. Resident #4 will be moving from A5A to A3A due to family request. Resident was notified of the room change on 04/11/2025. The resident representative was notified, the family member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to hand hygiene and cleaning of resident care multi-use equipment. Findings included: On 06/11/2025 at 9:55 a.m. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed entering room A-3 which had Contact Precaution signage on the outside of the door. Staff A placed a blood pressure cuff on Bed A's, Resident #8's lower right arm. While waiting for the blood pressure to be performed Staff A placed her right hand on the footboard of the bed. Staff A removed the blood pressure cuff, exited the room and placed it on the medication cart. Staff A did not hand hygiene nor clean the blood pressure cuff. Staff A documented the blood pressure on her paperwork. Staff A moved the medication cart across the hall to room A-11. Staff A was approached by another staff member, and she went down the hall with the staff member. Staff A opened the wound care cart and removed items and returned to the medication cart without performing hand hygiene. Staff A started performing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances and progress toward a resolution for concerns expressed in Resident Council Meetings by three residents (#63, #52, and #23) of 36 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's the Resident Council Minutes from 9/12/2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed the residents were voicing complaints regarding receiving clothing back from the laundry. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An interview was conducted with Resident #63 on 10/16/23 at 10:10 a.m. During the interview Resident #63 stated, I had a lot of expensive stuff, now it's gone. They told me to write my name on my stuff, I did, and it didn't make a difference. Yes, I told them, and they said I needed to go to the clothing drive. I told them what's that got to do with my missing stuff. I don't trust them. I don't trust them when it comes to my clothes. An interview was conducted with Resident #52 on 10/16/23 at 11:35 a.m. During the interview Resident #52 stated, Oh, it's bad. You can ask anybody . They just keep saying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of the admission Record for Resident #33 showed an admission date of 12/20/2019 with diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease (Stroke), peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness and other co-morbidities. A review of Resident #33's MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/14/2023 revealed in Section C - Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven out of fifteen which revealed the resident was moderately cognitively intact. Section E Behaviors showed the resident had no behaviors, did not reject care or evaluation of care. Section G Functional Status was marked for no impairment of the upper or lower extremities. Further review of the MDS revealed no documentation that Resident #33 had functional impairments at admission. On 10/16/2023 at 10:00 a.m. and 1:41 p.m. Resident #33 was observed in bed, covered with a sheet and arms above the sheet. Resident #33's right and left hands were folded at the metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP aka knuckles). During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) medications on one medication cart (A-wing cart) were secured while unattended, 2) insulin pens and vials were dated in one medication cart (B-wing cart), 3) bottles of ophthalmic solutions were dated and internal/external medications were not stored in the same compartments on one medication cart (C-wing cart) of four medication carts observed. Findings included: An observation was made on 10/18/23 at 8:19 a.m. of medication administration with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #33. The nurse dispensed one Multivitamin over the counter (otc) tablet, one Vitamin C otc tablet, and one Zinc otc tablet from separate bottles. The staff member left the three otc medication bottles sitting on the unlocked and unattended medication cart (A-wing cart) as the medications were administered in the resident's room. The medication cart was parked in the hallway and to the side of the doorway to the resident's room. An observation was conducted with Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN) on 10/18/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation of medication administration on 10/18/23 at 8:21 a.m. with Staff G, LPN the following medications were dispensed for Resident #37: -Buspirone 10 milligram (mg) tablet -Folic Acid 1 mg tablet -Diltiazem 120 mg tablet -Montelukast 10 mg tablet -Spirolactone 50 mg tablet -Xifaxan 550 mg tablet -Potassium 20 milliequivalents (meq) Extended Release (ER) tablet -Omeprazole 20 mg over the counter (otc) tablet -Iron 325 mg otc tablet -Magnesium oxide 400 mg tablet otc. Staff G, LPN placed the tablets in a medication cup while dispensing and when asked to confirm there were 10 tablets, Staff G poured the tablets out of the cup and onto an 8x11 piece of paper lying on the medication cup. Staff G put the tablets back into the cup with bare hands including a couple that had rolled off the paper and onto the top of the medication cart. Staff G confirmed 10 tablets and turned toward the doorway of Resident #37's room. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL