Arcadia Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 141.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, electronic medical record (EMR), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed and determined if a resident was capable of self-administration of medications for 2 of 23 residents sampled for self-administration of mediation. (Residents #118 and #392) The findings include: Resident #392 On 11/18/24 at 11:30 AM, Resident #392 was observed with a tube of Triamcinolone Acetonide (a cream meant to treat skin conditions such as eczema, dermatitis, and allergies) at the bed side. Resident #392 stated he uses this for general itching. He stated the nurses don't know he is using it, and he has been using this medication for 15 years. A second observation on 11/19/24 at 9:00 Am revealed the Triamcinolone cream was still at the bed side table. A review of the EMR for Resident #392 revealed diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other specified complication, presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, essential Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, unspecified, benign Prostatic hyperplasia without lower Urinary tract symptoms,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store resident care equipment in a sanitary manner in 3 of 24 sampled resident rooms. (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) The findings include: An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was conducted on 11/18/24 at 4:02 PM. Three wash basins (2 labeled with 64 A and one not labeled) and an unlabeled bedpan were observed to be sitting on top of the sink. Further observations of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was conducted in the presence of Employee F, the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager, on 11/20/24 at 3:00 PM. Employee F observed and confirmed 3 basins stacked on top of each other and one unlabeled bedpan on top of the sink. She stated the items should be stored in the resident's bed side drawer. (Photographic evidence was obtained.) An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was conducted on 11/18/24 at 2:50 PM. Three unlabeled wash basins were stacked on top of each other and an unlabeled urinal was sitting on top of the sink. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 2 of 2 residents sampled for falls. (Residents #46 and #3) The findings include: On 11/18/24 at approximately 11:00 AM, Resident #46 was observed sitting on the fall mat beside the bed. Resident #46 was assisted by staff to return to their wheelchair. A review of the most recent care plan for Resident #46, dated 09/16/2024, described Resident #46 as having potential for falls/injury due to impaired safety awareness, being spontaneous, not remembering to use the call light or ask for assistance, and forgetting to use a walker. Part of her plan included using a Dycem mat in her wheechair's seat to prevent slipping out of the wheelchair. On 11/18/2024 at approximately 2:05 PM, and 11/19/2024 at approximately 1:20 PM and 2:50 PM, Resident #46 was observed using her wheelchair. The seat of the wheelchair was visible during observations and a cushion was used in the seat by Resident #46. However, no Dycem mat was observed in the wheelchair either above or under the cushion in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage for 1 of 6 residents reviewed. (Resident #8) The findings include: A review of the medical record on 1/16/2024 found no evidence of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) issued to Resident #8 or the resident's representative. In an interview on 1/16/2024 at approximately 2:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if Resident #8 had run out of Medicare covered days. She stated that, upon admission from the resident's previous facility, they thought Resident #8 had only utilized 32 bed days while at that facility. Resident #8 would have had 8-10 days left upon her discharge in September. They had not realized she had used 62 days at the previous facility. When they had last checked the billing days from the previous facility, it showed Resident #8 had used only 32 days. It was updated later by that facility to show she had 62 days had been used. The DON was asked if they had issued a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123. She stated that they did not because…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed and determined a resident was capable of self-administration of medications prior to allowing 1 of 33 sampled residents to self-administer medications. (Resident #106) The findings include: An observation and interview was conducted with Resident #106 on 6/20/2023 at 4:22 PM. A partial bottle of lanthanum carbonate, a partial Symbicort inhaler, and a bottle of Dakin's solution was observed to be sitting on the overbed table. Resident #106 stated he administers the lanthanum carbonate (a phosphate binder) himself because it must be taken when he eats. Further observations of Resident #106's room was conducted on 6/21/2023 at 2:00 PM. The medications remained on the overbed table, even though the resident was out of the facility. (Photographic evidence obtained.) Resident #106's record revealed no physician's order or assessment regarding the self-administration of the medications. A progress note dated 6/10/2023 indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services needed to maintain personal hygiene to dependent residents for 2 of 3 residents sampled for Activities for Daily Living (ADL). (Residents #481 and #479) The findings include: Resident #481: On 06/19/23 at approximately 12:58 PM, an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #481. She complained of not receiving any help with a bath. Resident #481's hair appears matted and oily, and her general skin appearance noted an oily sheen. Resident #481's husband at bedside reported that he is upset that no one has helped her get a bath and confirmed no information was received upon admission about her plan of care, including bathing. On 06/20/23 at approximately 12:04 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #481, in which she stated, I had therapy this morning, it went good, but I still haven't had a bath, haven't been offered any assistance with getting one since being here , I asked for some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment in accordance with professional standards to meet the physical needs for 2 of 5 residents sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents #481 and #479). The findings include: Resident #481: On 06/19/2023 at approximately 12:55 PM, an observation was made of 2 adhesive gauze dressings to Resident #481's left hip after the resident voiced concerns that staff had not changed the dressings since admission. The dressings were not dated, timed, or initialed. When the resident was asked what the dressings were for, she stated, from surgery, I fell and broke my hip and they had to do surgery to repair it. On 06/20/2023 at approximately 12:00 PM, a second observation was made of 2 adhesive gauze dressings to Resident #481's left hip with no date, time, or initials. The dressing appeared to be the same dressing noted on the prior observation and was lifting on the sides. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL