Brookhaven Rehab & Health Care Center L L C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 34.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 298 beds and averages 291.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00352779), the facility did not ensure that the alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later that two (2) hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involved abuse and do not involve serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Agency). This was evident for one (1) out of four (4) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 was observed on the floor in their room bleeding from their nostrils at around 7:03 AM on 08/20/2024. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with nasal bone fracture. Resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00352779), the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident in one (1) out four (4) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 who was at risk for fall, was observed on the floor next to their bed bleeding from their nostrils at around 7:03 AM on 08/20/2024 during morning round. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. Record review of Resident #1's plan of care revealed Resident #1 has had multiple falls into their room, however, the facility had no documented evidence that the effectiveness of the interventions implemented were evaluated. Additionally, there were no documented evidence of the frequency of monitoring. The findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled title Fall, Accident and Incident Report with a review date of 02/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00330312) from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) multiple residents reported during confidential interviews and the Resident Council meeting that the facility was short staffed at times especially at night and on the weekends, there was a lack of timely staff response to call bells, 2) multiple nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing; and 3) analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from January 05, 2024 through February 25, 2024, the facility was below the minimum levels documented on the Facility Assessment. The findings included but were not limited to: 1. During an interview on 03/04/24 at 11:46 AM, Resident #165 stated that staff were always short in all shifts, and when staff were short, they must wait.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00326246) from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services and assistance to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene. Specifically, resident care was not provided to ensure proper hygiene and grooming. This was evident for 4 of 11 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of a sample of 38 residents (Resident #21, Resident #165, Resident #98, and Resident #67) The findings include: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, revised 03/2024, documented that all residents will be provided care for the activities of daily living based on the amount of assistance needed. Activities of daily living include bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, transfers, and ambulation. Bathing including bed bath, showers, oral care, hair care, nail care. Toileting includes use of bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The facility policy titled Infection Control -Standard Policy last reviewed 11/2023 documented hand hygiene is a major component of standard precautions and one of the most effective methods to prevent transmission of pathogens associated with health care. The policy further documented all individuals including residents should comply with infection control practices in the health-care setting. During an observation of Medication Administration on the 6th Floor on 03/04/24 at 08:30 AM, Registered Nurse #1 was observed administering medication to Resident #80. Registered Nurse #1 removed the resident's medications from the cart and poured the liquid medication into a medication cup, removed, and crushed the tablets, and poured them into the medication cups. Registered Nurse #1 was not observed sanitizing their hands before or after preparing the medication. Registered Nurse #1 then entered Resident #80's room, turned off the tube feeding, adjusted the bed control, donned gloves, and then proceeded to administer the medication without sanitizing their hands. On 03/04/24 at 08:44…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not ensure that the resident's right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences was maintained. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Accommodation of Needs out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #186 was not able to enter the bathroom in their room. The closet, which was placed in a corner of the resident's room, prevented the bathroom door from opening fully to permit Resident #186 to enter the bathroom in their wheelchair. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Routine Maintenance revised 12/23 documented that the maintenance department will ensure that the physical environment, furniture, and equipment is maintained in good repair throughout the facility. The routine maintenance program will ensure a safe and comfortable environment for residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/04/2024 to 3/08/2024, the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident on 4 of 5 resident floors (Floors 3, 4, 5 and 6) during review of the Environment. Specifically, 1) Air Conditioning/Heating (AC/H) units were noted to have dirty with debris and in disrepair, missing baseboards in multiple resident rooms and a room noted with discolored floor tiles and a persistent urine odor in a Resident's room, 2) a resident room with a persistently dripping faucet, and 3) a room that did not accommodate resident preference to use toilet in their room. The findings are: #1.On 03/04/2024 at 07:56 AM, On 03/05/2024 at 11:30 AM, 03/06/2024 at 11:56AM and 04:45PM and 03/08/2024 at 11:29 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with missing baseboards, ripped wallpaper approximately 6 inches to left of headboard and by AC/heater unit at wall. On 03/04/2024 at 08:01 AM, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00326272) survey from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from misappropriation of property. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 172) of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, a Certified Nursing Assistant used Resident #172's Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card to purchase items totaling about $1000.00 without Resident #172's consent. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention with effective date 2/2022 and last review 10/2023 documented the resident will be protected from misappropriation of resident property. It also documented the misappropriation of resident property means deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Resident #172 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure, chronic combined systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not ensure an effective discharge planning process was developed and implemented. This was evident for 1 (Resident #186) of 1 resident reviewed for Discharge out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documentation of additional follow-up on a discharge referral for Resident #186. The findings are: The policy titled Discharge Planning/Implementation dated 10/2023 documented that it is the policy of the facility that the Social Work department, along with the Interdisciplinary Team, begin discharge planning for each resident upon admission to the facility. Discharge planning options are also reviewed during quarterly and annual comprehensive care plan meetings. The policy also documented that the Social Worker would maintain contact with the Interdisciplinary team to facilitate an appropriate discharge for the resident and ample time to coordinate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey, from 03/04/2024 to 03/08/2024, the facility did not provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the resident's care plan. This was evident for 1(Resident #225) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #225's oxygen cannula/tubing was found on the floor on multiple days, and there was no date on the tubing indicating when the tubing was changed. The findings are: The facility policy Care of Oxygen-Nasal Cannula revised 09/2023, included that oxygen tubing/cannula must not be permitted to touch the floor and to document date and initial on tape attach to the tubing/cannula when changed. If the cannula/tubing touches the floor, it should be changed immediately. Resident #225 had diagnoses including mild intermittent Asthma with (acute)exacerbation, and Chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY