The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 454 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 173 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 336 beds and averages 274.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey conducted (complaint# 2633955) the facility failed to ensure one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, on 09/30/2025, Resident #1 fell out of bed. Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 assessed Resident #1 and assisted lifting them into bed using a Hoyer lift. Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 failed to document the fall in Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record, failed to complete a facility Occurrence Report, failed to notify Physician of the fall, and failed to notify Resident #1's family. As a result, Resident #1 was not monitored for pain or injury by the facility following the fall and the physician did not see Resident #1 for follow-up. On 10/02/2025 Resident #1 developed bruising on their right lateral thigh and decreased range of motion due to pain. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #6 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/15/2025 that resulted in injuries. The facility's accident and incident investigation report did not include statements from all staff involved. Additionally, the staff statements that were obtained were inconsistent and did not accurately indicate staff's response to the incident. Incident #2706534The findings include: The facility policy titled Accident and Incident, dated 02/2026, documented it is the policy of the facility to maintain a resident environment that is as free of accident hazards as possible and to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents, and to promptly respond to, report, investigate, and document all accidents and incidents in accordance with state and federal regulations. An incident report is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Designated Representative was notified when the need to start a new form of treatment was identified. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, Resident #5 was started on amoxicillin 875 milligrams-potassium clavulanate 125 milligrams (an antibiotic to treat infections) on 08/07/2025 for cough. There was no documented evidence that Resident #5's designated representative was notified of the resident's change in condition and the need to start a new treatment of antibiotic until 08/12/2025.Complaint #2663274The findings include:The facility policy titled, Change in Condition last revised on 05/2026 documented that it is the facility's policy to identify and communicate changes in condition to the Physician and other team members to implement interventions to prevent further deterioration and possible event of hospitalization. The resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standard of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, Resident #3, who receives dialysis treatment at the facility three times per week, was not provided dialysis treatment on their scheduled day on 06/20/2026 due to lack of communication between the facility staff and the dialysis center staff.The findings include:The facility's policy titled, Dialysis last revised on 01/2020 documented that the facility will ensure that all residents who need hemodialysis treatment will receive the services as ordered by the Attending Physician. A dialysis communication tool will be initiated by the unit Nurse, and all pertinent information will be communicated between dialysis and the Nursing unit through the communication tool. Notify the dialysis center of any changes in the resident's condition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey initiated on 11/20/2024 and completed on 11/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set assessment accurately reflected each resident's status. This was identified for one (Resident #190) of three residents reviewed for Communication. Specifically, Resident #109 utilized hearing aids as per the physician's orders; however, the annual Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #109, dated 8/17/2024, did not accurately reflect the use of hearing aids or other hearing appliances. The finding is: The facility policy titled MDS Assessments, dated 1/2024 documented that the Resident Assessment Coordinator was responsible for ensuring the Interdisciplinary Team conducted timely and appropriate resident assessments. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS Resident Assessment Form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. Resident #190 had diagnoses that included bilateral Hearing Loss. Resident #190's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/18/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/20/2024 and completed on 11/26/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, during Resident #19's wound care observation on 11/25/2024, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not apply the physician-ordered treatment to the wound and the peri-wound (the skin around the wound) area. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Aseptic Dressing Technique, dated 1/2024, documented for the nurses to review the current physician's order for specific treatment instructions and apply treatment as ordered. The facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 1/2024, documented the licensed nurse assures the six rights: right resident, right medication, right dose, right time, right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/20/2024 and completed on 11/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that it provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #19 had a physician's order for a collagen wound treatment product that included silver as an ingredient. The treatment product delivered by the Pharmacy had a label affixed to the box by the pharmacy that corresponded with the physician's order (included silver as an ingredient); however, the actual wound care product provided did not include silver as an ingredient. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Pharmacy Services dated 1/2024, documented the facility has contracted with the pharmacy to provide pharmacy and prescription delivery services. The pharmacy will provide a continuum of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey initiated on 11/20/2024 and completed on 11/26/2024, the facility did not ensure to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This was evident during Kitchen and Dining Tasks. Specifically, during the kitchen tour on 11/20/2024 tuna salad dated 11/12/2024 was observed in the walk-in refrigerator. Additionally, the temperature of the egg salad, macaroni salad, and potato salad served during the lunch meal was above acceptable standards for safe serving temperatures. The finding is: The undated facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage Temperatures and Storage Life Guidelines documented that foods will be stored at appropriate temperatures and for a specified duration to assure freshness and nutritional adequacy. The facility policy and procedure titled Food Handling and Storage, dated 3/2024, documented that all aspects of food handling from receiving and storing are done according to guidelines and monitored to keep foods free from harmful…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/20/2024 and completed on 11/26/2024, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, during Resident #19's wound care observation on 11/25/2024, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 placed rested the normal saline soaked gauze pads directly on the exposed skin of the resident's right hip and then used the same gauze pads to cleanse the resident's right buttock pressure ulcer. The finding is: The facility policy titled Aseptic Dressing Technique, dated 1/2024 documented that aseptic technique (practices that prevent the spread of germs and contamination with microorganisms) is to be performed during all dressing changes and/or treatments unless otherwise indicated by the Physician. A clean barrier is placed on the over-bed table to protect the equipment from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/9/2023 and completed on 2/15/2023 the facility did not ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality. This was identified for one (Resident #565) of one resident reviewed for insulin usage. Specifically, Resident #565, who had diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), had physician's orders to receive insulin as a standing dosage with sliding scale coverage. The facility staff did not identify the site of the insulin administration for the daily insulin administration (standing order), did not identify the amount of insulin administered, or identify the site of the insulin administration for the sliding scale coverage on multiple occasions. The finding is: The facility policy titled Insulin Administration and Sliding Scare Management, dated 3/2020 and last updated on 4/2022, documented to administer insulin coverage as ordered by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/9/23 and completed on 2/15/23 the facility did not ensure that resident records were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one resident (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, the facility did not have documented evidence that Colostomy care was provided to Resident #72 as per the facility protocol. The finding is: The facility policy titled Colostomy care dated 9/2022 included to document changes and any unusual observation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Resident # 72 was admitted with diagnoses that include End-Stage Renal Disease, Bilateral Above Knee Amputation (AKA), and Paraplegia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-11-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $9.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY