Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 480 beds and averages 468.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (Complaint #666294) conducted from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance consistent with the resident's needs to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #49) of seven (7) residents reviewed for accidents out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #49 fell and sustained major injury while being provided care in bed by Certified Nursing Assistant #2. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #49 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include:The facility policy titled Accidents/Incidents with a last revised date of 12/12/2022 documented Avoidable Accident - Resident had an accident and the facility failed to: 1) Identify environment hazards and individual resident risk for accident, including the need for supervision; 2) Implement interventions, including adequate supervision, consistent with resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided care that was consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 3 (Residents #27, #451 and #412) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Nebulizer mask, oxygen cannula, and oxygen tubes were observed in residents' bedside that were not dated and were exposed or not kept in a bag. 2.) Resident #412 was observed receiving oxygen without a physician's order.The findings include: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy with a last reviewed date of 07/2018 stated that Oxygen therapy must be ordered by a physician except during emergency when a Registered Nurse may initiate oxygen therapy without a physician's order and then obtain the order by telephone. The policy stated a sealed package with a nasal cannula will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident for 1 (Resident #318) of 7 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not report to the New York State Department of Health an unwitnessed incident on 07/10/2025 when Resident #318 was observed on the floor with a laceration to the forehead that required 5 sutures. Resident #318 was unable to explain the occurrence. The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Accidents/Incidents with a last reviewed date of 12/12/2022 stated the purpose of the policy was to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility failed to ensure that parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident in 1 (Resident #451) of 2 residents reviewed for hydration, out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #451 was observed with undated peripheral intravenous catheter insertion site dressing and tubing. The intravenous solution was also not dated and was not labeled with the resident's name and flow rate. The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Intravenous Infusion with a last reviewed date of 01/2022 documented that intravenous fluids should be labeled with the resident's name, the time, date, and rate of flow. The policy stated intravenous catheters are left in for no longer than 72 hours unless otherwise ordered by a physician. If intravenous therapy is ordered for greater than 72 hours, the site must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility failed to ensure that food were served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This was evident for 1 (Unit 5) of 13 units observed. Specifically, on 07/30/2025, foods served during breakfast in Unit 5 were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperature. The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Food Temperature Policy with a last revision date of 05/2025 documented all hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 140-degree Fahrenheit. The facility's policy titled Food Temperature Policy with a last revision date of 05/2025 documented the purpose of the policy was to ensure all meals are consistently prepared and served in a manner that is appealing in taste, texture, aroma and presentation, promoting resident satisfaction and nutritional intake.Resident #20 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00366573 & NY00364335), the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for two out of seven residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled for abuse. Specifically, On 12/18/2024 at 3:35 PM, Resident #1's adult child reported to Nurse Manager #1, on 12/18/2024, that they witnessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00366573), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged violation of abuse. This was evident for one out of seven residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1's adult child reported to Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, on 12/18/2024, that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 used the dining room table to shove Resident #1 to sit in their wheelchair on 12/18/2024 at 3:28 PM. The facility investigated the alleged allegation of abuse and concluded that abuse did not occur. The facility did not interview residents that were in the dining room and other staff that were on the unit to ascertain if there were any potential witness. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Prevention supersedes on 10/2022 states that allegations of resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of property will be thoroughly investigated; documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, during the Recertification survey from 6/1/23 to 6/8/23, the facility did not ensure that garbage was properly disposed. Specifically, garbage was not covered while being removed from the kitchen to the disposal area. This was evident during the Kitchen task. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Waste Disposal created 4/2018 and last revised 3/2023, documented garbage will be disposed of as needed throughout the day and at the end of each day. The policy further stated that prior to disposal, all waste shall be kept in leak-proof, non-absorbent, fireproof containers, trash bags shall be sealed prior to removing them from the facility, and trash will be deposited into a sealed container outside the premises. On 06/07/23 at 10:36 AM, Food Service Worker (FSW) #1 was observed disposing of kitchen garbage. FSW #1 removed tied, clear plastic bags from a covered garbage bin, placed them in a large, grey, rectangular wheeled container, then pushed the wheeled container through the back of the kitchen, behind the tray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, during the Recertification survey from 6/1/23 to 6/8/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, multiple items were observed in freezers and refrigerators without proper labeling and dating. This was evident during the Kitchen task. The findings are: A facility policy and procedure titled Food safety, last reviewed 5/22, documented that all aspects of food handling, from receiving and storing, are done according to guidelines, and monitored to keep foods free from harmful microorganisms, contaminants and ensure quality and freshness is preserved. The policy further stated that food items with expiration dates or best by or use by dates should be discarded once the date has passed. On 06/01/23 at 09:49 AM an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Director of Food and Nutrition (DFN), and the following was observed: in the sandwich refrigerator there were individually wrapped sandwiches (which were not on a tray) with no dates; in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, metal trays of raw fresh chicken were observed placed on top of cardboard boxes in the refrigerator and sandwiches were not maintained at an appropriate temperature. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation Task. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled, Food Handling Temperature Guideline, reviewed October 2020 documented to maintain all potentially hazardous cold foods, i.e. meats, milk products, at 40 degrees F. or below to prevent spoilage and contamination. On 07/15/21 at 09:55 AM, a metal pan of seasoned chicken covered with plastic wrap was observed stored in the refrigerator on top of other boxes of raw chicken. On 07/20/2021 at 11:10AM, a metal tray with raw fresh chicken was observed placed on top of cardboard boxes in the refrigerator. On 07/20/2021 at 12:43 PM, the Food Service Director removed a turkey sandwich from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents received their personal needs account statements on a quarterly basis. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that 2 residents received their account statements on a consistent basis. This was evident for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for Personal funds out of 38 sampled residents (Resident #180 and #388). The findings are: The facility policy Resident Funds Accounts (RFA), revised November 2020, documented the facility will provide on request, and at least quarterly to the resident or the resident's designated or legal representative, a statement showing the account balance including funds deposited and withdrawn and interest accrued. 1) Resident #388 was diagnosed with Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) and Depression. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #388 had intact cognition. An interview was conducted with Resident #388 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY