Golfview Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 52.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide prompt efforts to resolve a grievance for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed. Findings include: An observation on 12/30/2025 at 12:28 P.M. of Resident #1's privacy curtain in her room revealed three ants moving on the curtain. An interview was conducted on 12/20/2025 at 12:31 P.M. with Resident #1. Resident #1 said that she had filed a formal grievance on 12/22/2025 regarding ants in her room. Resident #1 provided a photo of the grievance that was written by her on 12/22/2025. A review of the facility provided grievance log for December 2025 revealed the facility did not have a grievance listed for Resident #1. An interview was conducted on 12/30/2025 at 1:15 P.M. with Staff D, Social Services (SS). Staff D, SS said Resident #1 filed a formal grievance on 12/22/2025. Staff D said she gave the grievance form to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) for review. Staff D said the NHA stated she would handle it [the grievance]. Staff D said she had not followed up with the NHA and did not know the outcome of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure alleged abuse were reported to the governing agency in accordance with the State law for one (Resident #1) of two residents sampled. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 12/30/2025 at 12:31 P.M with Resident #1. Resident #1 filed a grievance on 12/22/2025 and provided a photo. Resident #1 said Staff C, Plant Director (PD) was aggressive and yelling at her. Resident #1 had given the grievance form to Staff A, Activities Director (AD). Resident #1 did not know the outcome of the grievance. Resident #1 had not spoken to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). An interview was conducted on 12/30/2025 at 1:15 P.M. with Staff D, Social Services Director (SSD). Staff D, SSD had given the grievance to the NHA on 12/22/2025. Staff D, SSD said Staff C, PD spoke rudely to Resident #1. Staff D, SSD had received the grievance form from Staff A, AD. Staff D, SSD did not know the outcome of the grievance. Staff D, SSD said the NHA had the grievance form for Resident #1. An interview was conducted on 12/30/2025 at 2:01…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a hospital stay for one resident (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharge process. Resident #1 was eligible for discharge from the hospital on [DATE] and as of 06/27/2025, the facility notified the hospital Resident #1 was not accepted back at the facility. Findings included:A review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 05/17/2025 to an acute care hospital. His medical diagnoses included, but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, and morbid obesity due to excessive calories.A review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 03/26/2025, documented a score of 15, which meant the resident was cognitively intact.A review of Resident #1's care plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within the two-hour time frame requirement, for one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a Psych note for Resident #1 dated 03/03/25 showed Resident #1 disclosed the CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] grabbed my arm (pointing to her left hand) and wouldn't let go. [Resident #1] then points at the dressing on her skin tears on her left hand. There is a third on her left forearm, and when asked her if that was related to the incident, she first says no and then quickly said yes. Review of a Change of Condition dated 03/01/25 showed Situation: 1. Sustained x 3 skin tears (left hand x 2 and left forearm x 1)- combative with CNA - hitting and calling her names. This started on: 03/01/25. Under A 2. Resident/Patient Evaluation on Behavior Evaluation, 7. Physical aggression was check marked. An interview was conducted on 03/17/25 at 10:20 a.m. with Staff D, Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for one resident (#2) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's admission Care Plan dated 12/04/24 showed the following focus and intervention areas, Resident #2, wishes to return back into the community when medically cleared. The goal showed, The resident will be able to verbalize/communicate required assistance post-discharge and services required to meet the needs before discharge. Interventions included to establish a pre-discharge plan with the resident/resident's representative/caregivers and evaluate progress and revise the plan frequently, and to evaluate the resident's motivation to return to the community. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident's discharge plan was not evaluated and her wish to return to the community when medically cleared was not honored. Resident #2's involuntary hospital transfer was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0626 — isolated
  Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit readmission from the hospital for one resident (#2) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Admission, Transfer and Discharge- Transfer and Discharge Requirements showed an intent statement: It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents are treated equally regarding transfer, discharge, and the provision of services, regardless of their payment source in accordance with state and federal regulations. On 3/17/2025 at 2:05 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Staff L, Case Manager at the local hospital where Resident #2 was admitted . Staff L stated Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] through the emergency department secondary to an involuntary hospitalization initiated by the facility. Staff L read from the resident's medical record and stated, the resident was seen by the emergency department physician and noted with no behaviors. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to preserve the quality of life related to therapy services for one (#6) out of 6 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of adjustment disorder with anxiety, chronic pain, spinal stenosis, lower back pain, edema, chronic pain syndrome, obesity, and bed confinement status. The resident also had a diagnosis of patient's noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen due to unspecified reason with an onset date of 9/1/24. An interview was conducted on 11/19/24 at 4:45 PM with Resident #6. She said she wanted to have therapy so she could gain strength to be able to sit on the side of her bed and in her wheelchair again. She said she used to be able to sit in her wheelchair but now she just laid in bed all day, every day. She said it had been over a year since she had therapy and the last time she had therapy she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for 24 current residents out of a total resident census of 47. The findings included: On 5/14/24 at 3:00 PM, a beneficiary notice was requested for Resident # 21. On 5/15/24 at 10:07 AM, the Interim Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated the facility could not provide Resident #21's beneficiary notice because the facility did not have access to the resident's full medical record. The Interim NHA stated the facility did not have access to the previous electronic medical record system used by the facility, which is where this document would be held. On 5/15/24 at 5:27 PM, the Medical Records Director (MRD) stated the facility began using a new electronic medical record system in May 2023. The MRD stated the facility did not have access to any residents' medical records prior to 4/31/2023. A review of the current census revealed 24 of 47 current residents were admitted to the facility prior to 4/31/2023. A review of the facility's undated policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that included: proper storage and labeling in the upright freezer, proper cleanliness and temperature of the walk-in cooler, and proper cleanliness and labeling of one (Station #2) of two nourishment refrigerators. This had the potential to affect 47 residents receiving food service from the kitchen. The findings included: On 05/14/24 at approximately 09:00 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen revealed the upright freezer had several open bags of vegetables in the freezer door with no date. One of the bags was observed to be punctured. Additional bags of frozen food items were also undated on the shelves. Interview at the time of observation with the Dietary Manager revealed it was difficult to place dates on packages because the stickers come off and marker does not adhere to cold wet bags. Observation of the walk-in cooler revealed a liquid puddle was present on the floor next to a crate containing bags of onions. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain copies of a portion of a medical record requested for one (#98) of nineteen sampled residents. The findings included: Review of a subpoena dated 1/29/2024, addressed to the facility with the Administrator's name revealed the facility was to deliver copies of medical treatment records, billing statements, and Power of Attorney documentation for Resident #98 for the time period of 8/1/2022 to current by 2/28/2024. On 5/15/24 at 5:27 PM, the Medical Records Director (MRD) reported that the facility changed to a new electronic medical record system in April of 2023. The MRD reported that the facility responded to the subpoena but was unable to provide documents prior to 4/31/2023. The MRD stated the party requesting the records was not informed that records from 2022 to 4/31/23 were not present in the medical records that were provided. The MRD reported that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) who was working when the request was received had sent an email to the corporate office about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$57,305 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

• $25,490 — penalty dated 2025-07-02
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $756K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL