Ormond Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 249 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a refund was issued to the resident or resident representative within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge from the facility for 1 resident sampled for refunds, Resident #2.The findings include: Review of Resident #2's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:45 am, a phone interview was conducted with Resident #2's brother who stated he had not received a refund after Resident #2 expired on [DATE]. He explained that he had called the facility several times but never got a return call. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:22 pm, the Business Office Manager (BOM) was asked to explain the refund process following a discharge. She stated that refunds are issued within 30 days of discharge. When asked how she determines refund amounts, she stated she has a packet that she uses for everyone. She fills out the needed information to determine the amount to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally intravenous (IV) used for the administration of intravenous fluids was removed in accordance with professional standards following the discontinuation of the IV for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for intravenous care. Resident #1 was discharged home with the peripheral IV remaining in her arm.The finding include:On 4/2/26 at 9:30 AM, a phone interview was conducted with Resident #1's daughter. When asked about her mother's discharge from the facility, she stated, It was concerning that the facility would send her mother home with an IV, and thankfully she was ok from it.Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 1/23/26, and discharge date of 2/13/26. The resident's medical diagnoses included essential hypertension, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia, unspecified.Review of the physician's order dated 1/31/26 revealed, Ok for peripheral IV placement for fluids. A second physician's order revealed, Sodium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and a review of facility records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain dietary equipment in safe and sanitary condition to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, with the potential to affect any resident who consumed ice from the facility's kitchen, by failing to maintain and clean the ice machine to prevent contamination/biological growth. Food safety and sanitation are important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Kitchen equipment shall be maintained and kept free of waterborne microorganisms to avoid a potential source of pathogen exposure.The findings include: During a follow up visit to the kitchen on 08/26/2025 at 11:20 AM, the ice machine located outside the kitchen's main door's ice diverter was covered with a slimy, pink substance. The 2025 ice machine cleaning log hanging on the side of the ice machine documented cleaning on 08/24/2025. (Photographic evidence obtained) During this follow up visit, the Regional Food Service Director verified with his personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Falls and other facility documentation, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #10) of 27 residents whose care plans were reviewed for falls. Fall mats were ordered for Resident #10 but were not in place, which could result in fall injuries. The findings include: On 8/24/25 at 11:30 a.m., Resident #10 was observed lying in a high bed with an air mattress and 1/4 side rails. The resident was asked if he had fallen and he replied yes. He reported several falls and having gone to the hospital after one fall. He could not remember the date, only that the fall was recent. On 8/25/25 at 9:30 a.m., the facility's matrix was reviewed. The matrix revealed that the resident had fallen with a major injury. On 8/25/25 at 2:30 p.m., Resident #10 was observed lying in bed. No fall mats were at bedside. His room and bathroom were checked, but there were no fall mats in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #28) of 27 residents in the survey sample whose care plans were reviewed. Resident #28, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating intact cognition, stated he was not receiving his medications as ordered, and a review of his medical record for August 2025 revealed that on numerous dates, five medications were not signed off by nursing as having been administered. Failure to administer medications as ordered by the physician has the potential to cause a negative outcome to the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial health and well-being. The findings include: On 08/24/2025 at 1:33 PM, Resident #28 stated he believed some of his medications were missed. He stated they were sometimes late or not provided at all.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for one (Resident #28) of a total survey sample of 27 residents whose records were reviewed. Resident #28, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating intact cognition, stated he was not receiving his medications as ordered, and a review of his medical record for August 2025 revealed that on numerous dates, five medications were not signed off by nursing as having been administered. The resident's record must reflect the care and services provided to the resident.The findings include: On 08/24/2025 at 1:33 PM, Resident #28 stated he believed some of his medications were missed. He stated they were sometimes late or not provided at all. Resident #28 could not identify a particular medication that was late or missed. A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility's transfer/discharge policy, the facility failed to ensure required documentation was completed prior to transfer/discharge for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, from a total sample of 7 residents. The findings include:Clinical record review indicated that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], re- entry on 9/7/22 and discharged on 7/31/25. His diagnoses included aftercare following joint replacement, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia without behavior, metabolic encephalopathy, anxiety disorder, need assistance with personal care, heart failure and neurogenic arthritis.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/19/25, indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 11 out of 15 possible points, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the physician's orders dated 7/31/25 for Resident #1 revealed he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations conducted in the central kitchen. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Sanitation, dated November 2017, revealed the following: All kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish, and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment shall be kept clean and maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosion, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas. Kitchen waste not disposed of by mechanical means shall be kept in clean, leak-proof, nonabsorbent, tightly closed containers and disposed of daily. 1. In a tour of the central kitchen on 05/20/24 at 8:55 AM, accompanied by the facility's Food Service Director (FSD), the following were noted: a. The floor around the kitchen and behind the stove area was noted dirty with pieces of scattered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of refuse in a sanitary manner for two of two observations conducted in the main dumpster area. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Garage and Rubbish Disposal, dated April 2022, revealed the following: All garbage and rubbish containing food waste shall be kept in containers. All containers shall be provided with tight-fitting lids or covers, and such containers must be kept covered when stored or not in continuous use. Each container must be thoroughly cleaned at least daily on the inside and outside so as not to contaminate food, equipment, utensils, or food preparation areas. Garbage and rubbish containing food wastes shall be stored to be inaccessible to vermin. Storage areas shall be always kept clean and shall not constitute a nuisance. All garbage and rubbish shall be disposed of daily. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pick-up services must be kept closed and free of litter around the dumpster area. 1. In an observation conducted on 05/20/24 at 8:50 AM in the main…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner while providing care and services for 3 of 22 sampled residents (Residents #15, #38, and #247). The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #15's medical record revealed that the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/15/24, revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 possible points, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 05/20/24 at 9:29 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J administering medications in the hallway to Resident #15, who was located next to the medication cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview with LPN J on 05/23/24 at 11:30 AM, she stated she had worked at the facility for three years. When asked if medications were administered to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL