No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Altoona Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

200 Seventh Avenue SW, Altoona, IA 50009 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (515) 967-4267 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (515) 967-4267 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (98%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2720 8th St SW · (515) 967-0133 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
101 8th St SE · (515) 967-2699 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee0.6 mi
108 8th St SW · (515) 967-7676 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship
602 5th Ave SW · (515) 967-2991

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.9%16.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%20.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.2%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.1%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.1%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.3%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%13.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.881.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.712.081.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.7%CMS range 36.7–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.0–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified82.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.8%CMS range 5.7–15.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
97.8%
Total nursing turnover
92.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, the Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.20.1, and policy/guidance review the facility failed to ensure accuracy on residents' Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Residents reviewed were coded incorrectly indicating their diagnoses were not determined to be a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) condition for 5 of 9 residents reviewed for MDS discrepancies (Residents #4, #7, #8, #53, and #54). The facility reported a census of 93 residents.Findings include:1. The MDS completed on 5/6/25, documented Resident #4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Section A1500 of Resident #4's MDS indicated resident is not currently considered by the state a level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Review of PASRR dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interview, record review and policy, the facility failed to follow professional standards of medication administration for 1 of 4 resident's observed for medication administration (Resident #69). During an observation the staff left medication at bedside. The facility reported a census of 93.Findings include:Resident #69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating a cognition intact. The MDS included diagnoses of diabetes, heart, lung, and kidney disease. Resident #69's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) included the following orders:a. Albuterol inhaler, inhale two puffs orally three times a dayb. Ipratropium bromide nasal solution, two sprays in both nostrils three times a day c. Fluticasone propionate nasal suspension two sprays in both nostrils two times a day On 3/18/26 at 12:24 PM, observed Resident #69 sitting at her bedside with her tray table in front of her. Observed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, representative interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide hand/nail hygiene for 3 of 3 days observed for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident # 77). The facility reported a census of 93.Findings include: Resident #77's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairments. The MDS included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the protective nerve covering, disrupting brain-body communication) and dementia.The Care Plan Focus initiated 7/12/24 documented Resident #77 had a self-care deficit and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The Interventions directed to provide nail care by checking, trimming, and cleaning nails during bath days and whenever needed.On 3/16/26 at 5:14 PM, Resident #77's Representative noted the cleanliness of Resident #77 could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete neurological checks for a resident with an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #98). The facility reported a census of 93. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed 1/19/26 revealed Resident #98 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted Resident #98 required substantial to maximum staff assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Resident #98 utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Diagnoses include anemia (low red cell blood count), diabetes, insomnia, and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) to the amputation site of the right lower leg/foot. The Care Plan, initiated 1/15/26, indicated Resident #98 had a risk for falls due to impaired balance, recent AMputation, poor safety awareness, and impaired neuromuscular function (connection breakdown between nerves and muscles causing weakness, fatigue). The Care Plan indicated a fall on 1/17/26. The Progress Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete smoking assessments for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 93. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed 3/12/26 revealed Resident #4 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating impaired cognition. Diagnoses include non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, and stroke. The Care Plan with a Target Date of 6/14/26 indicated Resident #4 smoked. Interventions included the completion of quarterly smoking assessments.The facilty acknowledged it is a smoking facility and provided a list of current residents who smoke. Resident #4's name was noted. Review of the EHR verified a smoking assessment was completed on 3/12/26. No further smoking assessments were identified that correlated with the resident's quarterly MDS (4/30/25, 7/28/25, 10/23/25, and 1/21/26). During an interview on 3/18/26, Staff I, Activities Assistant, confirmed Resident #4 went out to smoke during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Resident Council Minutes, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to answer resident call lights within the allotted professional standard of 15 minutes for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #4 and #11) . The facility reported a census of 97 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented Resident #4 was dependent (helper does all the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. or , The assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity) for toileting and transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis affecting left nondominant side of body), anxiety and respiratory failure. During a continuous observation on 10/28/25 from 9:20 AM to 10:00 AM the following was revealed; note at 9:20 AM Resident #4's call light on. At 9:40 AM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff protected and prevented resident to resident abuse for 1 of 3 reviewed (Resident #7), when Resident #6 hit Resident #7 a couple of times in the back while in the main lobby area. Resident #7 had a known history of resident-to-resident altercations and the facility failed to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions to prevent harm to other residents. The facility reported a census of 97 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia and diabetes. Resident #6's Care Plan documented a problem with the revision date of 11/21/24 as follows; the Resident had episodes of behaviors as evidenced by negative verbalizations, name calling, cursing at others, aggressive behaviors toward other residents, tearfulness, rude…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete incident reports or document for 2 of 3 resident-to-resident altercations reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 97 residents. Findings include: Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia and diabetes. Resident #6's Progress Notes documented the following:a. 10/6/24 at 12:08 PM Resident #6 has been noted the last two days, picking on another female resident. If she is in her way of getting thru to her table, she shoves her wheelchair to move her so she can get through. Today Resident #6 shoved her again and stated You dumb bitch, get out of my way. Staff spoke with Resident #6 about the way she was treating the other resident and reminded her that she cannot put her hands on anyone or anyone's wheelchair and not shove her or anyone else.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels in the building for one of two dinning rooms. The facility reported a census of 90 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 6/23/25 at 1:10 PM the back dining room area thermostat read 83 degrees. The dining room was uncomfortably warm, staff in the dining room and residents in the dining room waiting to go outside to smoke had flushed faces and staff had sweat on their faces. There were two fans in the dining area. During an interview 6/23/15 at 1:15 PM Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated the air conditioning unit in the dining room kept freezing up and quitting this weekend and it was even hotter in the dining room this weekend, on Sunday. She called the Director of Nursing (DON) on Sunday, they were unable to get someone out to fix it on Sunday, the unit was out all day on Sunday and the temperature in the dining room was in the high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, medication administration log, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare or administer medication as prescribed and ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #7). The facility reported a census of 90. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum data set (MDS) for Resident #2, dated 05/14/2025, documented her brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score as 15, indicating fully intact cognition. It documented the following relevant diagnoses: anemia (low blood iron), renal insufficiency (kidney failure), and Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes). Review of the Care Plan for Resident #2, last revised on 05/21/2025, recorded the resident's diabetic status and instructed staff members to give medications as ordered by doctor. It also instructed staff members to monitor the resident for signs of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia (high and low blood sugar). It instructed staff members to document side effects and effectiveness. Review of the medication and treatment administration records (MAR and TAR), from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment. The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. Observations revealed the following: a. On 2/24/25 at 1:45 PM, a loud beeping sound audible in the hallway and in a resident's room with the door closed. b. On 2/24/25 at 1:47 PM, Hall A and B had an odor that smelled like urine. A large gray barrel had the lid partially off and garbage inside. Hall C had four wheelchairs, a linen cart, a weight chair, a Broda chair, a mechanical lift and carts with lids lined along the hallway. c. On 2/24/25 at 1:55 PM, a loud beeping sound continued in the ABC hall. d. On 2/24/25 at 2:09 PM, the loud beeping sound continued. e. On 2/24/25 at 2:32 PM, the loud beeping sound subsided. f. On 2/24/25 at 3:02 PM, Hall C had three wheelchairs, a broda chair, a weight chair, a linen cart, a mechanical lift, and a soiled linen cart parked along the handrail in the hallway. g. On 2/24/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, and Resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the residents the assistance needed in order to complete their individual activities of daily living for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #3, #12, #58, and #84). The facility reported a census of 94. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly MDS for Resident #84, dated 01/28/2025, documented his brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score as 15, indicating intact cognition. It documented the following diagnoses: Heart failure, Hypertension, renal insufficiency, Cerebrovascular Event (Stroke), Seizure disorder, Malnutrition, Acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. It further documented the resident was dependent upon staff for transferring, ambulation, and personal cares. The Care Plan for Resident #84, last revised 02/03/2025, documented the resident required an assist of one person for personal cares and encouragement for oral hygiene. It instructed staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately and safely transferred three of five residents observed during transfers (Resident #12, #19 and #84). The facility also failed to ensure cigarettes kept in a secure location for one of two residents reviewed for smoking (Resident#79). The facility also failed to reduce clutter in six of six hallways to create a homelike environment, and to ensure clear hallways for the residents to easily move throughout the facility without obstacles. The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had diagnoses of osteoporosis, dementia and bipolar disorder. The MDS documented the resident had 2 or more falls without injury. The MDS indicated the resident had impaired range of motion to bilateral lower extremities, and required substantial to maximum assistance for transfers. The Care Plan revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, facility assessment, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the residents' needs safely, in a timely manner and that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility reported a census of 94 residents. Findings include: Observation of breakfast dining on 2/25/25 revealed the following: 8:30 AM, twenty-four residents were sitting in one of the facility's two dining rooms, dietary staff noted to be plating resident's food from a steam table. 8:39 AM, twenty-one of twenty-four residents had been served, three residents sat at an assisted feeding table had not been served their breakfast. 8:42 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered the dining room and assisted one male resident with feeding. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) assisted the second male resident with feeding. 8:46 AM, the third male resident, sat with his eyes closed, had his food sitting in front of him and not eating. 8:47 AM, Staff L, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification survey. The facility reported a census of 94 residents. Findings include: Review of facility's CMS 2567 from a recertification and complaint surveys on 4/11/24, 2/13/24, 12/29/22, and 3/23/22 revealed the facility received non-harm level citations for infection prevention and control. The facility's Plan Of Correction (POC) for Recertification and Complaint Survey dated 4/11/24, revealed correction date of 5/2/24 for infection prevention and control revealed documentation present at the end of the CMS-2567 form included the following: The Facility reasonably ensures that infection control procedures are followed. This includes the proper usage of gloves for patients during perineal cares to prevent cross contamination. 1. Residents have been receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity demonstrated by lack of dressing assistance prior to a meal in the main dining room and disregard to privacy for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #84, #89). The facility reported a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #89 dated 2/11/254 documented diagnosis included non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and paraplegia. The MDS revealed the resident had required substantial or maximal assistance with upper and lower body dressing. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam scored 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The Care Plan focus initiated 1/23/25 for Resident #89 documented, self-care deficit as evidenced by requiring assistance with activities of daily living included dressing. Intervention under category of dressing and undressing, directed one-person assistance. The mobility category documented, does not ambulate, utilizes wheelchair that staff propels. An observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide rehabilitative services as ordered for 1 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #84). The facility reported a census of 94. Findings include: The Quarterly MDS for Resident #84, dated 01/28/2025, documented his brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score as 15, indicating intact cognition. It documented the following diagnoses: Heart failure, Hypertension, renal insufficiency, Cerebrovascular Event (Stroke), Seizure disorder, Malnutrition, Acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. It further documented the resident was dependent upon staff for transferring, ambulation, and personal cares. The Care Plan for Resident #84, last revised 02/03/2025, documented PT/OT would evaluate and treat as ordered. It did not document a restorative plan. Speech Therapy (ST) Plan of Treatment with start of care date 1/29/25 documented Summary of Daily Skilled Services as follows; Physician's order received. Resident would benefit from further ST services in order to maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, interviews and facility policy the facility failed to provide appropriate intervention with urinary catheter to minimize or prevent complications from the reoccurring urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary conditions (Residents #195). The facility reported a census of 94 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #195 relayed resident had an indwelling catheter. Diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate), renal insufficiency, septicemia and sepsis unspecified organism. The Care Plan for Resident #195 initiated 2/19/25 documented Resident #195 had the potential for infection related to a history of sepsis, pneumonia, and catheter. Resident #195 has a supra pubic catheter, Goal to be managed appropriately and not exhibit signs of infection. Intervention included to provided catheter care as per the facility policy. In an interview on 2/24/25 12:15 PM with Resident #195…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and facility contract the facility failed to effectively coordinate medication management with hospice services to assist with symptom management in relation to resident and Power of Attorney (POA) wishes for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Hospice (Resident #73). The facility reported a census of 94. Findings include: The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/14/25, revealed Resident #73 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses include anxiety, depression, encephalopathy (disease in which brain function is affected by a medical condition), history of bariatric surgery, malnutrition, and Non-Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS noted a life expectancy of less than six months with Hospice Care initiated. High risk medications listed on the MDS include antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants, anticonvulsant, diuretic, and opioids. The Care Plan, last review completed 1/20/25, listed Resident #73 as independent with bed mobility, eating, dressing, and mobility. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP's) and infection control practices for 1 of 4 residents sampled on EBP's (Resident #19). The facility also failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to protect against cross contamination and potential spread of infection for a resident on droplet precautions for 1 of 4 residents on droplet/contact precautions. The facility reported a census of 94 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had diagnoses diabetes, pneumonia and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the left heel. The MDS indicated the resident required substantial to maximum assistance for transfers. The Care Plan revised 12/31/24 revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity related to a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the left heel and required EBP's. The resident also required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, resident interview, Resident Council Minutes and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly provide perineal cares for random residents and failed to provide baths/showers to residents according to their individual desires and/or needs. (Resident #2) The facility identified a census of 87 residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview 7.31.24 at 9:50 a.m. Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed there had been times she found residents in bed with their disposable undergarments wet all the way through their bedding completely soiled with sheets that showed signs of dried urine as noted by a dried dark circle around the wet urine which signified the resident had not been changed for a lengthy period of time. During an interview 8.1.24 at 10:43 a.m. Staff M, CNA/Shower aide confirmed she had not been able to shower residents according to their individual schedules due to staffing issues and that many residents complained however she had been unable to give specific names. The staff member also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, photos and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a locked treatment cart on two (2) separate occasions. The facility identified a census of 87 residents: Findings include: An observation 7.30.24 at 4:46 p.m. revealed an unlocked and unattended treatment cart located along the wall outside of room N6. An observation 8.1.24 at 2:32 p.m. revealed an unlocked and unattended treatment cart located along the wall just outside of room A46. The facility had identified 8 residents who wandered. According to an email 8.6.24 at 3:56 p.m. the Administrator confirmed she expected staff to have locked medication and treatment carts when unattended. A Security of a Medication Cart policy not dated indicated the medication carts should have been secured during medication passes. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation included the following: a. The nurse must have secured the medication cart during the medication pass for prevention of an unauthorized entry. b. When it had not been possible to park the medication cart in the doorway, the cart should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide restorative exercises according to the resident's individual plan of care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2 and #5) The facility identified a census of 87 residents. Findings include: 1. According to an email 8.6.24 at 9:54 a.m. the Administrator indicated residents on the restorative program should have received their exercises 3-6 times per week. 2. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 5.30.24 indicated Resident # 2 had diagnosis that included a Neurogenic Bladder, Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and Arthritis. The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) and required staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS documented that the resident had three days of occupational and physical therapy with the start date of 5/15/24 to end date 5/28/24. Review of restorative records dated 7.4.24 through 8.1.24 for Resident #2 directed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained a safe and secure environment for 1 of 3 residents at an elopement risk. (Resident #4) The facility identified a census of 87 residents. Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 6.11.24 indicated Resident #4 had diagnosis that included Hypertension (HTN), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Depression and repeated falls. The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 (moderately impaired cognitive skills) and independent with ambulation. A Care Plan addressed the following Problem areas and Interventions as dated: a. A self-care deficit as evidenced by required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's), impaired balance during transitions and required assistance for ambulation. (revised 3.8.24). 1. One (1) staff assistance with transfers and mobility. (revised 3.8.24) b. At risk for falls related to (r/t) impaired balance, poor safety awareness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, and facility maintenance records, the facility failed to maintain the combination walk-in freezer and refrigerator in a clean and satisfactory condition. The facility reported a census of 89. Findings include: Observation on 04/08/24 at 1:15 PM revealed frost in the freezer had recently melted, formed an icicle, and dripped on an open box of chicken. The icicle that hung in the corner was approximately six inches in length at the time of the initial observation. On 04/11/24 at 09:02 AM Staff R, Dietary Supervisor stated they have been aware of the frost and drip issue for the duration of their employment, about one year. They noted it is the responsibility of kitchen staff and the dietary supervisors to report issues with the freezer to the maintenance supervisor. They reported staff have been instructed not to place items under the areas of the freezer where the dripping occurs. On 04/11/24 at 09:05 AM Staff P, Maintenance Supervisor reported he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident statements, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to contain odors, wipe soiled surfaces and clear cluttered hallways to promote a homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: Observation on 04/10/24 at 08:55 AM revealed a strong, very pungent ammonia / urine odor from the dirty linens present in A Hallway. Odor first noted outside of room A40. A fan on the wall near the ceiling blew down on the dirty linen and the trash containers which were covered. The urine odor continued to the next room outside of room A42 which also contained a barrel labeled trash only - 33 gallon bin. The strong urine smell continued past room A44 and A46 where the smell dissipated near the nurses station. The linen bin contained a half full clear trash bag lining which was visible as the zipper not zipped up on the outside cloth liner. Soiled bed incontinence pads could be seen within the linen bin. Observation on 04/10/24 at 09:06 AM revealed the presence of a strong, very pungent ammonia smell outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interview, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly notify resident representative when there was a room change with resident health changes for 1 of 1 residents (Residents #242) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #242 dated 4/05/2024 documented an admission date of 4/01/2024. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The Clinical Record Review of Resident #242 indicated having a family member, daughter, involved in discussions about health status and changes from the date of the admission. During an interview on 4/11/24 at 12:30 PM with Resident #242 daughter, it was revealed that the facility did not notify her of the room change. During an interview on 4/11/24 at 2:30 PM with the Administrator, she confirmed that the facility failed to notify Resident #242 representative prior to a room change. Review of a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed notify the long term care ombudsman for resident transfers to an acute care hospital for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for rehospitalization (Resident #44). Findings include: The census line of the Electronic Health Record of Resident #44 reflected the resident was on an unpaid hospital leave from 1/3/24 through 1/10/24. The General Progress Note dated 1/3/24 at 5:30 pm reflected the resident was making suicidal statements in a conversation with the Social Worker. The progress note documented the social worker reported this to the Director of Nursing and was instructed to call 911 and the resident was sent to the hospital at approximately 5:30 pm. The admission Assessment note dated 1/10/24 reflected the resident returned to the facility on that date. The Notice of Transfer Form to Long Term Care Ombudsman with an email date of 2/5/24 failed to document resident #44 to be included on the list of residents reported to the Ombudsman to have transferred from the facility in January 2024. On 4/10/24 at 1:53 pm, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code resident MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments to reflect accurate resident conditions for 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #2, #47). Resident #2 inaccurately coded as having no PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level II evaluation and Resident #47 inaccurately coded for the use of bed rail restraint. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented the resident was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The MDS recorded no response under Level II PASRR conditions: Serious Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Other related conditions. The MDS documented active diagnoses that included psychiatric / mood disorders of: anxiety, depression, bipolar depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to update and revise the Care Plan to reflect therapy recommendations of resident restorative activities program for three of three sampled residents in order to maintain a functional range of motion and activities of daily living (Residents #19, #28, and #44). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, and cancer. The MDS revealed Resident #19 independent with bed mobility, toileting and transfers. The MDS indicated the resident not steady but able to stabilize without staff assistance when she moved from a seated to standing position and when transferred between the bed and chair or the wheelchair. The MDS recorded the resident's range of motion (ROM) not impaired. The resident had Occupational Therapy (OT) 12/20/22 to 1/10/23, and Physical Therapy (PT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to properly transcribe and implement provider orders for 1 (Resident #18) of 7 residents reviewed for medication orders. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: The MDS of Resident #18 dated 2/21/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident required substantial assistance for bed mobility. The MDS reflected the resident experienced frequent urinary incontinence. The MDS recorded the presence of one Stage 3 pressure ulcer with no pressure ulcers present upon the resident's admission to the facility, and one diabetic foot ulcer. The MDS failed to reveal the presence of of Moisture Associated Skin Damage. The Care Plan of Resident #18 revealed a focus area of self care deficit with a revision date of 10/11/23. The Care Plan noted the resident to have a history of refusing cares or assistance with cares. The Care Plan directed staff the resident required 1 person assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative activities for three of three sampled residents in order to maintain a functional range of motion and prevent a decline in activities of daily living (Residents #19, #28, and #44). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, and cancer. The MDS revealed Resident #19 independent with bed mobility, toileting and transfers. The MDS indicated the resident not steady but able to stabilize without staff assistance when she moved from a seated to standing position and when transferred between the bed and chair or the wheelchair. The MDS recorded the resident's range of motion (ROM) not impaired. The resident had occupational therapy (OT) 12/20/22 to 1/10/23, and physical therapy (PT) 1/2/23 to 1/11/23, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident council meeting, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient and competent staff to meet resident needs with bathroom cares and answering call lights timely for 1 of 10 group resident interview and 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #15, #13, #4, #31). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had diagnoses of Lewy Body dementia, diabetes, and pruritis (itching). The MDS recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4,which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident required substantial to maximal assistance for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene, and had incontinence. The Care Plan revised 3/6/24 revealed the resident had incontinence and at risk for impaired skin integrity and had rashes/irritations. The staff directives included provide peri-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who desired to receive routine dental care for a cleaning and to assess for possible oral cavities received arrangement of services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #15 identified a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] recorded under the dental section the resident with obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The Progress Notes dated 9/1/2023 and 12/26/2023 indicated the resident requested dental services with no follow-up documentation contained in progress notes. On initial interview 04/08/24 at 4:10 PM Resident #15 stated she had been on the list to go to the dentist for months. On 04/09/24 at 03:09 PM staff in charge of dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to follow infection control practices in order to prevent and control the onset and spread of infection within the facility by not removing soiled gloves and performing hand hygiene for two of two nursing units observed. The facility also failed to disinfect resident care devices when soiled with urine and failed to ensure staff utilized infection control techniques in order to prevent cross contamination for 3 of 4 residents observed during incontinence cares (Resident #2, #31, and #47). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had diagnoses of Lewy Body dementia, diabetes, and pruritis (itching). The MDS recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident required substantial to maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on CDC (Center for Disease Control) recommendations, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide education and administration of pneumococcal immunization for 28 residents identified by the facility eligible to be offered and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for pneumonia vaccine (Resident #18, #47). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: The CDC website, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/, published 9/21/23 recorded the CDC recommended PCV15 or PCV20 for adults who never received a PCV and are ages 65 years or older. For ages 19 through [AGE] years old with certain risk conditions, if PCV15 was used, it should be followed by a dose of PPSV23. The CDC recommended adults who received an earlier PCV (PCV7 or PCV13) should talk with a vaccine provider. The provider can explain available options to complete the pneumococcal vaccine series. Adults 65 years or older have the option to get PCV20 if they have already received PCV13 (but not PCV15 or PCV20)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and pictures the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and homelike environment. The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation and photo taken 2.7.24 at 9:12 a.m. revealed two (2) holes on the wall beside the bed of Resident #1 repaired with Spackle however not sanded and/or painted. An observation and photo taken 2.7.24 at 9:13 a.m. revealed the linoleum/laminate flooring in the Resident's room separated and not sanitizable. 2. An observation and photo taken 2.8.24 at 9:13 a.m. revealed 2 holes on the wall beside the bed of Resident #2 repaired with Spackle however not sanded and/or painted. 3. An observation and photo taken 2.8.24 at 9:13 a.m. revealed 2 holes on the wall beside the bed of Resident #3 repaired with Spackle however not sanded and/or painted. An observation 2.13.24 at 12:50 p.m. revealed the same observation as documented above. 4. An observation 2.1.24 at 4:30 p.m. revealed a brown substance with the appearance of stool on the wall beside the bed of Resident #11. A photo taken 2.1.24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly provide perineal cares for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #11) The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11.16.23 indicated Resident #2 had diagnosis that included Cerebral Palsy, Autistic Disorder, Entercolitis due to Clostridium difficile (C-Diff) , Seizures and Intellectual Disabilities. The assessment identified the Resident with short and long term memory deficits, severally impaired cognitive skills, as always incontinent of his bowels and bladder and as dependent on staff with toileting hygiene. A Care Plan identified the following Problem and Interventions as dated: a. Self-care deficit as evidenced by required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's), impaired balance during transitions required assistance and incontinence. (revised 8.30.23) 1. The resident had been unable to use the toilet, bed pan or bed side commode. Assistance required with check and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, Resident Council Minutes and facility policy review the facility failed to answer resident call lights within the allotted professional standards of 15 minutes for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #3 and Resident #6) The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: An observation 2.11.24 at 4:28 p.m. revealed the call light on for room B 43 which staff answered at 4:50 p.m. During an interview 2.8.24 at 9:15 a.m. the Resident #3 indicated she waited a long, long time for call lights but there had been nothing that could have been done because any anger would have not solved the problem. During an interview 2.11.24 at 4:10 p.m. Resident #3 indicated on 2.10.24 during the afternoon she timed her call light on for 3 hours as she used the clock on her wall. The Resident stated she finally called her daughter in law and had her call the facility and tell them she required assistance. During an interview 2.1.24 at 4:01 p.m. Resident #6 indicated when she went to the bathroom and placed her call light on for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record and facility policy review, the facility failed to reconcile narcotic/controlled substance counts at the beginning and ending of every shift for four of four medications carts. The facility census was 94 residents. Findings include: 1. Record Review of the Scheduled 2 Narcotic Shift Count for February 2024, revealed that the following dates lacked signature that acknowledged the controlled drug count was correct on: *South Hall Cart on 2/2/24 at the beginning/end of the 2:00 p.m., to 10:00 p.m. shift, and on 2/6/24 the beginning of the 2:00 p.m. shift. *West Hall Cart on 2/3/24 at the beginning/end of the 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. shift. *AB Hall Cart on 2/6/24 at the beginning/end of the 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., shift. 2. Record Review of the Scheduled 2 Narcotic Shift Count for January 2024, revealed that the following dates lacked signatures that acknowledged the controlled drug count was correct on: *AB Hall Cart on 1/17/24, 1/23/24, 1/25/24, at the beginning/end of the 2:00 p.m., to 10:00 p.m. shift. *BC Hall Cart on 1/3/24, at the beginning/end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to remove soiled gloves during personal cares for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2 and Resident #11) The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation 2.7.24 at 9:30 a.m. revealed Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff C, CNA DONN (put on) proper personal protective equipment (PPE) which included gloves since Resident #2 had been diagnosed with Clostridioides Difficile (C-Diff), an infectious disease of the colon) and had been placed on contact precautions. The Staff C confirmed the resident as incontinent of urine. With gloved hands Staff C pulled down resident ' s brief, cleansed the resident anteriorly, positioned the resident on his left side while she touched his person, bedding and clothing with the same gloved hands and then cleansed the resident posteriorly. With the same gloved hands Staff C assisted Staff B as they pulled up the resident's clean brief. Staff B stepped away from the area, removed gown and gloves, washed hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of Resident Rights the facility staff failed to treat 2 of 3 residents with dignity and respect while providing resident cares. (Resident #11 and Resident #15) The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation 2.1.24 at 4:48 p.m. revealed Staff H, CNA and Staff I, CNA as they opened the room door of Resident #11 without having knocked and/or announce themselves. They stood at the resident's bedside and looked at the resident who layed in bed with her eyes closed. Staff I left the room as Staff H remained at the Resident's bedside . Staff I returned, left the room door ajar approximately 4 centimeters (cm) as other residents and staff walked past. The staff members proceeded to provide perineal cares which exposed the resident to the staff and residents who walked past her room. 2. An observation 2.2.24 at 11:07 a.m. revealed Resident #15 disrobed from the top up as she sat in her recliner in her room right inside the door visible to all residents, families and staff who walked by and with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly provide care and treatment to a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2) The facility identified a census of 94 residents. Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11.16.23 indicated Resident #2 had diagnosis that included Cerebral Palsy, Autistic Disorder, Entercolitis due to Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff) , Seizures and Intellectual Disabilities. The assessment identified the Resident with short and long term memory deficits, severally impaired cognitive skills. The MDS documented the Resident as always incontinent of his bowels and bladder, dependent on staff with toileting hygiene, and at risk for pressure ulcers. A Care Plan identified Interventions/Tasks to have provided treatments as ordered. (dated 6.8.23) A Treatment Administration Record (TAR) form directed the facility staff to have cleansed the resident's wound to his coccyx area with a cleanser of choice followed by an application of a foam boarder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #6 and Resident #7 ) The facility identified a census of 90 residents. Findings include: 1. A Medication Administration Record (MAR) form for Resident #6 dated 11/1/23 thru 11/30/23 indicated the resident received the following insulin orders from the physician to have been administered as indicated: a. Lispro (short acting insulin) sliding scale insulin for blood sugars between 201-250 administration of 4 units at 8 a.m. for diabetes mellitus (DM) b. Levemir (long acting insulin) Subcutaneous Solution inject 100 units subcutaneous every morning and at bedtime at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. for DM. During an observation on 11/16/23 at 8:54 a.m. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) administered the medications for Resident #6 as follows: a. Mucinix DM one (1) two (2) times a day (BID). The staff member placed the Mucinix directly into her ungloved and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, resident council minutes and facility policy review the facility failed to answer resident call lights within the allotted professional standards of 15 minutes, (Resident #5 and #6) The facility identified a census of 90 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 11/16/23 at 12:41 p.m. Resident #5 confirmed she timed her call light as on for up to an hour on the 2 p.m.- 10 p.m. shift as she used the clock on the wall beside her bed which caused frustration. The resident indicated the staff thought it took a 1/2 an hour for her hour of sleep (HS) cares so they failed to answer her call light which she felt had not been true. During an interview on 11/16/23 at 1:04 p.m. Resident #6 described call lights as terrible at the facility and staff walked around like snails. The resident timed her call light on as long as one (1) hour as she used her her cell phone or television. The resident described the call lights as worse on the 2 p.m. till 10 p.m. shift which pissed her off. There had been times she called the nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and Resident Council minutes the facility staff failed to treat 2 of 4 residents with dignity and respect during the showering process, (Resident #4 and #5) and failed to provide proper discussions during resident cares. The facility identified a census of 90 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 9/27/23 indicated Resident #4 had diagnosis that included anemia, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-alzheimer's dementia . The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 (severely impaired cognitive skills) and bathing had not occurred in the look back period for the assessment. (7 days) A Care Plan with a Problem revised 9/29/23 indicated the resident with a self-care deficit as evidenced by required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). The interventions included the following: a. Bathing/showering: One person assistance. Encouraged bathing two times a week. (revised 4/28/23) An observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to properly clean and maintain the highest functional capability for an oxygen concentrator for one resident reviewed, (Resident #6) The facility identified a census of 90 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 10/24/23 indicated Resident #6 had diagnosis that included cancer, anemia, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure and respiratory failure. The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact), with shortness of breath (SOB) when she laid flat and on oxygen (O2) therapy. A Care Plan with a Problem revised 8/10/23 documented the resident as on continuous oxygen and as at risk for alteration in levels O2 due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of smoking and chronic respiratory failure. The approaches included the following: a. Oxygen via nasal canula (NC) as ordered. (initiated 7/25/23) A Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide the necessary assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed following a fall, (Resident #1) The facility identified a census of 90 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 10/8/23 indicated Resident #1 had diagnosis that included aphasia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and hemiplegia. The MDS indicated the resident as rarely/never made self understood and/or understood others, short term and long term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive skills. The assessment indicated the resident suffered from an impairment of both sides of his upper and lower extremities and as dependent on staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). A Care Plan with a Problem area initiated 6/15/23 and revised 11/16/23 indicated the resident at risk for falls related to a diagnosis of hemiplegia which affected his right dominant side. A Progress Notes entry dated 11/14/23 at 10:45 p.m. included the following documentation: a. 11/14/23 at 6:30 p.m. the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • CHITAI INVESTMENT, LLC — investment firm · 12.52% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TECHCARE CORP — investment firm · 12.52% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOLDCO GOLDFINCH, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2019
CHITAI INVESTMENT, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2019
HOLDCO TABLETOP, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2019
INVESTCO TABLETOP, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2019
TECHCARE CORPOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2019
CURCIO, DOMINICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2019
DOLE, ISAACIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
THOMAS, JOSEPHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2019
REALCO ALTOONA, IA, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2019
CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
MANAGERCO GOLDFINCH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
MANAGERCO TABLETOP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2019
BAUCOM, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2021
FISHER, MALORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2025
OCONNER, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
SATTERFIELD, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$947K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 6%Other / private 22%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $947K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,574per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165162. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next