University Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to disinfect a mechanical lift after use between 2 of 2 residents (#37, #55) and failed to use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and enteric isolation precautions for 2 of 2 residents (#13, #75). The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings include:During a continuous observation that began on 3/03/2026 at 6:37 AM, Staff K, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transported a mechanical lift from a storage room to Resident #54's room.At 6:40 AM, Staff K transported the mechanical lift from Resident #54's room to Resident #55's room. The mechanical lift was not sanitized between resident use.At 6:50 AM, Staff J, CNA transported the mechanical lift from Resident #55's room and took it to Resident #37's room. The mechanical lift was not sanitized between resident use.At 6:56 AM, Staff J transported the mechanical lift from Resident #37's room and placed it in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide showers for dependent residents in 1 of 18 resident's reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) (Resident #58). The facility reported a census of 74. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #58, completed on 02/25/2025, recorded the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14, which indicated intact cognition. It documented the following relevant diagnoses: Diabetes Mellitus (diabetes), and arthritis. It documented the resident was a below-the-knee amputee and had reduced mobility and a need for assistance with personal cares. It documented the resident entered the facility on 11/28/2025. The Care Plan for Resident #58, last revised on 03/02/2026, documented the resident required two-person assistance for bathing and showering, and instructed staff members to encourage the resident to bathe or shower twice weekly. Review of bath and shower records from 12/01/2025 through 03/01/2026 revealed the following: Resident #58…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to correctly position a resident in a mechanical lift during transfer for 1 of 3 residents (#14), failed to lock the wheelchair during resident transfers for 2 of 3 residents (#44, #55), and failed to attach foot pedals on the wheelchair while transporting a resident for 1 of 1 resident (#69). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.Findings include:1.Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of hemiplegia (one-sided body paralysis caused by brain or spinal cord damage), diabetes mellitus, and a stroke. It revealed he was independent with eating and oral hygiene, was dependent with toileting, and required maximal assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and all forms of mobility.The Care Plan initiated 10/24/24 directed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, electronic health record (EHR) review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5%. A total of 27 ordered medications were reviewed with two errors, an error rate of 7.4%. The facility reported a census of 74. Findings include: During an observation on 3/4/26 at 7:55 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse, prepared at total of 8 different medications for Resident #33. Staff B obtained one Omeprazole 20 milligrams (mg) pill from the resident's medication card as well as one Omeprazole 20mg pill from an over-the-counter floor stock bottle. Staff B also obtained two Vitamin D3 125 micrograms (mcg)/500 International Units (IU) pills from an over-the-counter floor stock bottle. These medications along with 6 others were administered to Resident #33. During reconciliation of the observed medication pass with current Physician Orders for Resident #33, the following was noted: 1.Omeprazole 20mg ordered for 1 capsule daily; 2.Vitamin D 1.25mg (50,000 IU) ordered for 1 capsule one time a week. In an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review and staff interview the facility failed to follow the menu and prepare food to meet the residents nutritional needs for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #6) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS also indicated diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. Review of EHR titled, Physician Orders for Resident #6 documented a regular diet of pureed texture. Review of EHR titled, Care Plan for Resident #6 documented a diet of puree consistency with thin liquids. Review of document titled, University Park FW 2024-2025, Week 3 Tuesday at noon documented a puree menu of 1 serving (8 oz) puree chili, 1 serving (1 each) puree cinnamon roll, 1 serving puree tossed salad, puree brownie/cinnamon buttercream frosting and 8 oz beverage. Review of untitled document…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Heath Record (EHR) review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with a surgical wound, a pressure wound and a resident with a wound vacuum, that were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 3 of 3 reviewed (Resident #3, #4, and #7). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS also indicated Resident #3 had an unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #3's EHR dated 5/5/25 titled, Weekly Pressure Wound Assessment documented an unstageable pressure wound present on the left heel that measured 3/6 cm length x 1.1 cm width x 0.1 depth. Review of Resident #3's EHR titled, Care Plan documented Resident #3 required EBP related to the presence of a chronic wound - pressure ulcer. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel document review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional by not having a certified dietary manager. The facility reported a census of 17 residents. Findings include: On 1/27/25 a request for documentation from the facility revealed the Dietary Director did not have the required certification. On 1/29/25 at 12:30 PM the Dietary Director confirmed he had been in the position for 3 weeks and had not completed the certification requirement yet. The Dietary Director stated he had previously held a Serve Safe Certification, but it had expired. The staff stated he was currently enrolled in the necessary coursework to complete the certification. On 1/29/25 at 1:20 PM the Administrator acknowledged the Dietary Manager was a new employee and had not completed his certification, but was currently taking the necessary coursework. The facility did not have a policy related to having a certified dietary manager. The Food and Drug Administration Food Code 2022 revealed the person in charge of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on documentation review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to document temperatures of food in the kitchen prior to distribution. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: Reviewed the kitchen meal temperature logs for 3 months. 4 meal temperatures out of 90 meals were not recorded in November. 8 meal temperatures out of 93 meals were not recorded in December. 25 meal temperatures out of 78 meals were not recorded in January On 1/29/25 at 12:30 PM the Dietary Director expected that all temperatures would be completed in the kitchen prior to distributing the food to the dining rooms, and completed in the dining rooms prior to serving. The Dietary Director stated he further expected that all temperatures were to be logged on the appropriate log forms whether the kitchen or dining rooms. The Dietary Director acknowledged with incomplete documentation it was unknown if the temperatures were taken prior to food distribution or serving,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility placed cooking utensils on countertops, and delivered drinks uncovered. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/27/25 at 9:45 AM revealed the ice machine had a light pink substance throughout. Continuous observation on 1/28/25 at 9:53 revealed Staff A placed a scraper on a countertop without a barrier during the preparation of pureed meat. During the preparation of mashed potatoes Staff A placed the whisk on the countertop without a barrier. Continuous observation on 1/28/25 at 12:07 PM revealed room tray service initiated. A room service tray left the dining room with 3 drinks uncovered. During preparation of the second tray, Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated forgot to put lids on the drinks. Observed a tray with uncovered drinks leave the dining room and enter the hallway when the Registered Dietitian stopped the delivery, and directed the staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to assure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #84 and #54). The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #84, dated 1/21/25, Resident #84 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting assistance and required substantial assistance for lower body dressing and chair to bed/chair transfer. The resident's diagnoses included a stroke. The Care Plan included Resident #84 had the potential for diversional activity due to cognitive impairment and/or physical assistance needed and the resident needed assistance to and from activities. Interventions included invite and encourage resident to attend activities and offer assistance for locomotion as indicated. The Care Plan further included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $837K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA