Glenoaks Senior Living Campus
100 Glen Oaks Drive, New London, MN 56273 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (320) 354-6057 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,822 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-23)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.7% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 4.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.1% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.8% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 5.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.2% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.1% | 82.7% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 38.3–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.4–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 40.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to investigate and respond to a Hoyer lift incident before placing the Hoyer lift back into care service for 1 of 2 (R2) residents. Additionally, the facility failed to have a system to perform regular maintenance on resident ceiling lift and failed to respond to voiced concerns by nursing staff related to ceiling lift malfunction and safety related to care planned two person Hoyer lift for 1 of 2 (R1) resident viewed for accidents. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R2 and R1. The IJ began on 7/30/23 at 8:22 a.m., when a Hoyer lift being used to transfer R2 would not stop and a different Hoyer lift had to be used to complete the transfer. The Hoyer lift was placed out of service for a short period but returned to service before the facility completed an internal investigation or contacted the manufacturer for direction. Additionally, the facility failed to have a system for routine maintenance related to a ceiling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications to prevent blood clotting were administered, and associated blood testing was performed, in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed who was at increased risk for recurrent stroke, clots, and/or decreased blood supply to tissues/organs causing a shortage of oxygen, after an ordered blood test was not performed resulting in missed subsequent anticoagulation orders and anticoagulation therapy for a 14 day period. These findings resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation, for R3 when the facility failed to take adequate, systemic action(s) to analyze R3's missed blood testing, missed and/or incorrectly administered anticoagulants, failed to update R3's medical provider related to the surrounding anticoagulants and/or blood test concerns, and failed to provide staff education to potential factors which contributed to the error thus causing the potential for similar reoccurrences and potential harm for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow manufacturer's safety guidelines for operating a wheelchair lift for 1 of 1 resident (R1). The facilities failures resulted in actual harm when R1 fell to the ground and sustained a head laceration that required transfer to the hospital emergency department for treatment. Findings include:Facility reported incident (FRI) #361588 submitted on 8/28/25, identified on 8/28/25, R1 experienced a fall from the facility transport bus while being transferred via the wheelchair lift. The incident occurred at approximately 11:30 a.m. during a scheduled clinic visit. R1 was being loaded onto the bus by trained staff (scheduler (SCH)-A).R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 did not have cognitive impairment, had diagnoses of fractured hip, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), R1 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), had a history of falls, and used oxygen. R1 had verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control surveillance program to identify, track, and analyze potential infections, including signs and symptoms of infections that did not result in antibiotic treatment, which had the potential to affect all 40 residents who resided in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was properly utilized during care for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: The facility's infection surveillance tracking logs from 3/1/26 through 5/31/26, identified the facility had tracked infections when a resident received antibiotic treatment. However, the surveillance logs failed to include monitoring and tracking of resident signs and symptoms of potential infections, including infections or communicable illnesses that had not resulted in antibiotic use. The facility's infection surveillance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were managed appropriately, including failure to complete monitoring for potential adverse effects related to antipsychotic medication use, and failure to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order included a required stop date/duration, for 2 of 5 residents (R6 and R26) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R6 had moderate cognitive impairment, received antipsychotic medication, and diagnoses included anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that caused changes in mood, energy, and activity levels), schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affected a person's thoughts, emotions, and behaviors), and obsessive-compulsive disorder. R6's physician orders, dated 6/10/26, identified an order for risperidone (an antipsychotic) 2 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for schizotypal disorder related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding bed hold and return rights when a resident was transferred to the hospital for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for hospitalization.Findings include:R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R6 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses included mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia (a chronic mental health disorder affecting thoughts, perceptions, and behavior), bipolar disorder (a mood disorder characterized by episodes of depression and mania), and seizure disorder/epilepsy.R6's progress note, dated 12/5/25 at 5:55 a.m., indicated R6 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] after being found on the floor experiencing active seizure activity with convulsions and unresponsiveness. However, R6's EHR lacked evidence the facility provided R6 and/or R6's resident representative with a written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital. During an interview on 6/09/26 at 2:50 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included individualized interventions for the use of a seat belt while seated in a wheelchair for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.Findings include:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R4's diagnoses included dementia, paraplegia (loss of movement and function in the lower body), and dysarthria and anarthria (difficulty or inability to speak clearly due to problems with muscle control). The MDS further identified R4 received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications, used a trunk restraint daily, and had no impairment of the upper extremities.During an observation on 6/8/26 at 1:15 p.m., R4 was observed seated in his wheelchair with a seat belt (trunk restraint) secured over R4's lap.R4's comprehensive care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised for 1 of 1 resident (R28) reviewed for elopement. Findings include: R28's admission Record, dated 6/10/26, indicated diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, major depression, anxiety disorder, hallucinations and muscle weakness. R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R28 was severely cognitively impaired, received substantial/maximal assistance assist with eating, and was dependent with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R28 resided on the secured memory care unit and a keypad code was required to enter and exit the secured unit. During multiple observations on 6/8/26 through 6/10/26, when R28 was not in her room recliner watching TV or sleeping, R28 was propelled by staff to and from her room to dining room and to activities off the secured memory unit in the main dayroom of the facility. R28's last Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 11/10/25, R28 scored a 3, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a restorative device was implemented and monitored to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of function when staff failed to ensure a right hand splint used for contracture management had a current order, and failed to document application attempts or refusals of the splint for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for range of motion.Findings include:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R4's diagnoses included arthritis, paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation in the lower part of the body), and dysarthria and anarthria (conditions that affected a person's ability to speak clearly). On 6/8/26 at 11:28 a.m., R4 was observed with his right hand completely contracted with his thumb positioned inside his curled hand. R4 stated he thought he had a splint or something to put in his hand but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis-related care needs were coordinated and implemented, including failure to clarify and implement fluid restriction interventions, for a resident at risk for fluid overload for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for dialysis services.Findings included:R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R11 had intact cognition, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and received dialysis services. R11's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (PVD; a condition causing decreased blood flow through the blood vessels), renal insufficiency (reduced kidney function), diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia (a mental health disorder affecting thoughts, emotions, and behaviors), and polyneuropathy (damage to multiple nerves causing weakness, numbness, or pain). R11's care plan, initiated 1/29/26, identified R11 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (permanent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as ordered when the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for occupational therapy (OT) evaluation and treatment was completed timely for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services.Findings include:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included arthritis, paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation in the lower part of the body), dorsalgia (back pain), aphasia (difficulty understanding or expressing speech), and dysarthria and anarthria (difficulty speaking due to impaired muscle control). The MDS further identified R4 had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities, and a trunk restraint was used daily.R4's progress note, dated 5/29/26 at 3:00 p.m., identified R4 was seen during provider rounds, and the provider was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program when the facility failed to complete antibiotic time-outs to evaluate the effectiveness and continued need for antibiotic therapy for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R23) reviewed for antibiotic use.Findings include:R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),dated 5/13/26, identified R5 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease.R5's physician orders, 5/14/26, identified an order for Macrobid (an antibiotic) Oral Capsule 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for urinary tract infection (UTI) suspicion related to increased agitation for five days. The order was initiated on 5/15/26, and discontinued on 5/20/26.R5's electronic health record (EHR) lacked evidence the facility had completed an antibiotic time-out (reviewed R5's response to the antibiotic, monitored for improvement or worsening symptoms, reviewed available laboratory results, evaluated if the antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview the facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 (R1, R5, R6 and R7) residents were treated with dignity and respect when care was provided to them by nursing assistant (NA)-PFindings include:Review of facility grievances identified a grievance dated 9/5/25, against NA-P made by R1, filled out by the director of nursing (DON). The grievance stated while DON was checking in on R1, R1 reported a nursing assistant for doing cares too fast. R1 identified NA-P. R1 further stated NA-P needed to slow down and I don't want her to help if that was even possible. DON reassured R1 she would speak to NA-P and R1 changed the topic.R1's significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified no cognition deficits. R1 had history of falls, and diagnoses of fractured hip, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dependent on oxygen and dependent on staff to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and used a wheelchair. R1 had verbal behaviors and rejection of cares.During an interview on 9/11/25 at 11:37 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed and protect residents after 2 of 2 allegations which included rushed and harsh cares in addition to physical abuse were reported by unknown residents which effected (R1, R4, R6, and R7) who reported on going inappropriate behavior and treatment by nursing assistant (NA)-P. Findings include:Review of NA-P's employee record included a written warning dated 8/1/25, that was authored by assistant director of nursing (ADON)-A. The ADON wrote- residents complained of nursing assistant (NA)-P being harsh and rushed, staff have complained about tone and verbiage coming from NA-P that is demeaning and lacked appropriate bedside manner. NA-P's employee record nor did the disciplinary action document identify which residents were involved that led to NA-P's written warning. Further, there were no recorded grievances and/or documentation of the concerns voiced by residents, there was no indication of an investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations for 4 of 4 nursing assistants (NA-P, NA-D, NA-S, and NA-L) were provided within the past 12 months.Findings include:Review of nursing assistant (NA)-P employee record identified a hire date of 10/25/23 and did not include a performance evaluation since NA-P's hire date. During interview on 9/12/25, nursing assistant (NA)-P could not remember receiving a performance evaluation since she was hired. Review of (NA)-D's employee record identified a hire date of 11/10/22 and included a performance evaluation dated 3/13/23; there were no subsequent performance evaluations included in her record.Review of NA-S employee record identified a hire date of 4/15/22 and included a performance review dated 3/13/23; there were no subsequent performance evaluations included her the record. During interview on 9/12/25 at 8:27 a.m., NA-S could not remember receiving a performance evaluation since 2023. Review of NA-L's employee file identified a hire date of 2/18/20, a performance evaluation for 2022 was found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse timely to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who reported staff to resident physical abuse. Findings include:A facility five-day investigation submitted by the administrator to the State Agency on9/3/25 indicated on 8/28/25, R1 had clinic appointment and had become upset with the physician. The report included a statement R1 made to the physician then we should talk about Glen Oaks and the staff that is beating me up. In review of facility reported incidents to the State Agency there was no indication R1's allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency. R1's significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 did not have cognitive impairment. R1 had verbal behaviors and rejection of cares.During an interview on 9/11/25, at 10:17 a.m., Administrator confirmed she submitted the five-day report to the State Agency that included the allegation of abuse R1 had made. On 8/28/25, she was told by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan that identified necessary policies and procedures describing how the facility will identify and correct quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: When interviewed on 4/23/25 at 1:29 p.m. the administrator indicated there was no formalized QAPI plan in place to track and measure performance, no goals established to measure performance, and no development or implementation of corrective action or performance improvement activities. The administrator stated although there were attendance rosters available for quarterly QAPI meetings from the past year, the facility lacked any documentation to reflect the QAPI process. The administrator stated awareness of the need for and importance of the QAPI process, however, was new to the facility and this had not yet been implemented. During follow up interview on 4/24/25 at 4:54 p.m., the administrator stated she had again reviewed all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance (QA) team developed, and revised, a quality improvement program to correct infection control concerns identified through tracking and trending and the infection control process as presented by the director of nursing (DON) during routine QAPI meetings. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/23/25, at 8:28 a.m., the administrator provided information for review related to the Quality Insurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance rosters, and meeting minutes for the current QAPI program. A review of the attendance roster and meeting minutes lacked indication as to what the overall program focused on, as well as what the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) focus was. The information following the attendance roster of 1/17/24 included hand written notes, however, these notes provided no context as to what the QAPI program was focusing on, benchmarks and goals, or information regarding the current PIP programs. The minutes did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to have a current, ongoing system of infection control (IC) surveillance to identify potential outbreaks of infectious disease, analyze data, and track infections through to resolution or identify the need to alter treatment. The facility also failed to ensure employee illnesses were tracked to identify when staff last worked and the criteria for when they would be allowed to return to work. The facility also failed to ensure staff appropriately wore a gown (personal protective equipment (PPE)) and/or bagged soiled linen during transport. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to appropriately disinfect 1 of 1 resident's (R7) glucometer prior to returning it to the medication cart, Findings include: RESIDENT INFECTION SURVEILLANCE Review of the infection surveillance logs from January 2025 through March 2025 identified the columns for name, room #, infection date, site of infection, culture taken, causative agent, antibiotic treatment, isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the infection preventionist had the appropriate time allotted to have oversight of the facility infection control program and was deemed competent in providing that oversight. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents. Findings include: RESIDENT INFECTION SURVEILLANCE Review of the infection surveillance logs from January 2025 through March 2025 identified the columns for name, room #, infection date, site of infection, culture taken, causative agent, antibiotic treatment, isolation precautions and center acquired (obtained while in the facility). In January 2025, three residents (R100, R101, and R18) were listed with active infections as follows: 1) R100 was listed twice with two separate infections, COVID and a urinary tract infection (UTI). An antibiotic was given for each infection. COVID (a virus) was treated with amoxicillin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) x three days. Isolation was marked yes. R100 second infection, identified to start the same day, was a UTI. No culture was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were appropriately secured in 1 of 2 unlocked soiled utility rooms located in hall A. This had the potential to affect 16 of 29 residents residing in that hall. Findings include: Observation on 4/21/25 at 1:49 p.m., of the unlocked soiled utility room a bottle of Lysol toilet bowl cleaner was sitting on the counter next to the sink. Some of the cleaner was spilled on the countertop. Interview on 4/21/25 at 1:54 p.m., with the maintenance director confirmed the above findings. He does walk through the building but was unable to recall the last time he had checked the utility rooms. He identified they have a locked closet off the nursing floor that is supposed to be used to store cleaning supplies and other hazardous chemicals. He was not certain who had left the toilet bowl cleaner in the unlocked utility room. Interview on 4/24/25 at 4:58 p.m., with the nurse consultant and administrator identified they would expect staff to ensure all hazardous chemicals are always kept in a locked closet away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physicians orders and manufacturers guidelines for 2 of 7 (R24 and R30) residents observed to receive medications. A total of seven (7) errors out of 26 errors were identified, resulting in a 26.9% (percent) facility error rate. Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 3:56 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN-A) was observed to prepare medications at a mobile medication cart in the hallway of the unit. R24 was in the hallway and approached the medication cart for medication administration. LPN-A proceeded to set up medications, including topical medication Voltaren External Gel 1 % (Diclofenac Sodium). The label for this prescription cream directed staff to apply two gm (grams). LPN-A stated she did not have the dispensing film to measure out the two grams as ordered, however, R24 only wished to receive a pea sized amount. LPN-A was unsure how much this was comparative to the two grams amount…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program to identify appropriate antibiotic use for 10 of 10 sampled residents (R1, R100, R18, R30, R18, R23, R15, R16, R5, and R101). Findings include: Review of the infection surveillance logs from January 2025 through March 2025 identified: In January 2025, two residents (R100 and R18) were listed with active infections as follows: 1) R100 was listed twice with two separate infections, COVID and a urinary tract infection (UTI). An antibiotic was given for each infection. COVID (a virus) was treated with amoxicillin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) x three days. R100's second infection, identified to start the same day, was a UTI. No culture was marked as having been taken, but R100 was also prescribed amoxicillin clavulanate potassium (a combination antibiotic) 875/125 mg, x six days, given twice per day. There was no information to identify what R100's symptoms were, if an antibiotic time out (ATO) was performed (done to ensure the resident is on the correct antibiotic or if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide complete information upon transfer to the receiving facility for 1 of 2 residents (R18) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Findings include: R18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R18 had impaired cognition and was noted to exhibit inattention and disorganized thinking. R18 was also noted to have intermittent behavioral symptoms including physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behaviors, and other symptoms not directed at others. R18 was noted to receive assistance with activities of daily living, although was able to ambulate independently. R18's medical diagnoses included acute kidney failure, renal insufficiency, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. A review of Resident Census was completed and it was noted R18 was hospitalized on [DATE], however, R18's narrative notes lacked indication as to reason for transfer or what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 2 of 5 residents (R20 and R26) Findings include: R20's 3/27/25, quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment identified he admitted to the facility in September of 2021, his cognition was severely impaired, and he was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R20 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, and arthritis. Interview on 4/21/25 at 12:35 p.m., with family member (FM)-A reported she has asked the facility staff to clean and trim R20's nails several times. She states his nails look terrible. Observation on 4/21/25 at 12:36 p.m., of R20's nails on both hands were observed to be untrimmed and extended beyond the tip of his fingers with an unknown black substance observed under each nail from edge to edge. Observation on 4/22/25 at 1:23 p.m., of R20's nails identified they remained the same as above. Observation on 4/23/24 at 2:34 p.m., R20's nails remain overgrown with an unknown black substance under the nail of each finger.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the hospice plan of care had been integrated with the facility care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R)17 to delineate services provided between the facility and hospice. Findings include: R17's 2/20/25, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified his cognition was severely impaired, and he was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL)s. R17 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, respiratory failure, and diabetes. Review of R17's current care plan identified he was on hospice. The care plan lacked any indication what services hospice was to provide during their visits to the facility. Interview on 4/24/25, at 5:05 p.m., with the nurse consultant identified she agreed with the above findings and would expect nursing staff to ensure the hospice care plan is integrated with the facility care plan. Review of the facilities 2017 Hospice Care policy identified residents receiving hospice services would have coordinated care plans that would include the most recent hospice plan of care and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultant recommendations were followed up on in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (R13) reviewed for pharmacy recommendations Findings include: R13's 3/12/25, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified his cognition was intact, he had no behaviors, and he was independent with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R13 had diagnoses of adjustment disorder with depressed mood, hypertension, diabetes, anxiety, orthostatic hypotension, repeated falls, and stroke. Review of R13's pharmacy consultants monthly drug regimen review identified the following: 1. October 2024 pharmacy consultant recommendation: Please assess for continued use of divalproex 250 mg twice daily, CMS guidelines recommend periodic reassessment of psychotropic medication for trial dose reduction consideration in attempts to eventually discontinue unnecessary psychotropics or find lowest effective dose. If current dose is still appropriate for patient, please provide clinical rationale for continuing current dose in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were labeled with current physician-ordered administration instructions to reduce the risk of administration error for 1 of 6 residents (R24) observed to receive medication during the survey. Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R24 had intact cognition with several medical diagnoses which included a medically complex condition, restless leg syndrome, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. On 4/22/25 at 3:56 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN-A) was observed to prepare medications at a mobile medication cart in the hallway of the unit. R24 was in the hallway and approached the medication cart for medication administration. LPN-A proceeded to set up medications, including obtaining the med card for Tramadol from the locked box. LPN-A stated R24 received Tramadol HCl 50 mg one tablet every eight (8) hours, and this was given on a routine basis A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assure cleanliness and monitoring of temps, and undated foods in 1 of 2 refrigerators in dining rooms, and 5 of 5 residents'(R7, R11, R13, R16, and R29) personal refrigerators located in resident rooms. Findings include: R16's 3/3/22, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified her cognition was intact, she had verbal behaviors towards others two-three days a week, and she was independent with meals and hygiene but required assistance with set up for dressing. R16 had diagnoses of morbid obesity, vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, adjustment disorder, and history of stroke. Observation on 4/22/25 at 5:03 p.m., of R16's room identified she had a small dorm style refrigerator. Inside the refrigerator she had 7 plastic containers with left over foods in them. The containers were not labeled and did not have dates on them. One container had tuna, one container had chicken, and one container had rice. The refrigerator also had condiments and cans of pop. The refrigerator did not have a log to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (R3, R8, R11, R13 and R19) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 3/15/2023, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R3's face sheet dated 3/6/24, indicated she was [AGE] years old. The immunization record dated 3/6/24, indicated she received a PPSV23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives for emergency care and treatment were accurately reflected in all areas of the resident's medical record to ensure residents wishes would be implemented correctly in case of an emergency for 1 of 17 residents (R15) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R15's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, aphasia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, depression, restless leg syndrome, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unspecified lack of coordination and abnormal posture. Review of R15's electronic medical record (EMR) identified the following: -R15's Order Summary Report identified Advance Directive: DNR (do not resuscitate) -R15's dashboard profile (viewed on computer screen) identified Advance Directive: DNR -R15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to 1 of 3 residents (R94) reviewed whose Medicare A coverage ended and then remained in the facility. Findings include: R94's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10123 signed as received on 10/23/23, identified a last covered day (LCD) of 10/23/23. R94's undated Census Records listing identified on 10/24/23, R94's payer source changed from Medicare Part A to Private Pay, and remained in the facility. R94's medical record was reviewed and lacked any evidence a SNFABN had been provided to explain the estimated cost per day or provide rationale or explanation of the extended care services or items to be furnished, reduced, or terminated. When interviewed on 03/05/24 at 4:16 p.m., the social services designee (SSD)-A stated she was responsible for providing the Medicare non-coverage notices within the facility but had missed providing the SNFABN to R94 at the time Medicare payment was ending. The SSD-A stated the importance of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to complete neurological assessments following falls for 2 of 3 residents (R15 and R21) who had unwitnessed falls. Findings include: R15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R15's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, aphasia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, depression, restless leg syndrome, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unspecified lack of coordination and abnormal posture. R15's record lacked evidence neurological assessments were initiated and completed after R15's unwitnessed falls on: 1/17/24, 1/19/24, 1/19/24, 1/25/24, 1/26/23, 2/1/24. 2/1/24, 2/8/24, 2/12/24, 2/13/24, and 2/23/24. R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had intact cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R21's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor orthostatic blood pressures with the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 3 resident (R12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R12's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. R12's medication and treatment record, print date of 3/5/24, indicated R12 had a potential for psychotropic drug adverse drug reaction (ADR's) related to daily use of psychotropic medications, and included to monitor for postural hypotension (blood pressure drops when you go from lying down to sitting up, or sitting to standing). R12's physician orders included orders for Risperidone (antipsychotic) 2 milligram (MG) by mouth two times daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During a complaint survey exited on 9/21/23, the state survey agency cited deficiencies in the areas of safe functional sanitary/comfortable environment and sufficient nursing staff. While the facility was in substantial compliance on 4/27/23, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee was unable to sustain compliance as evidence by the following repeated deficiencies: Findings include: F725- Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet assessed needs for 5 of 5 residents (R8, R1, R29, R5 and R23) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs); quality of care for 1 of 1 (R35) residents reviewed for nursing assessement; 9 of 9 residents (R7, R10, R11, R15, R16, R17, R18, R22 and R25) reviewed for supervision in a memory care unit; RN coverage; and as expressed by Resident Council, Staff, and 2 family members (FM-D and FM-E) who had concerns about the lack of sufficient nursing staff at the nursing home. F921- Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet assessed needs for 5 of 5 residents (R8, R1, R29, R5 and R23) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs); quality of care for 1 of 1 (R35) residents reviewed for nursing assessement; 9 of 9 residents (R7, R10, R11, R15, R16, R17, R18, R22 and R25) reviewed for supervision in a memory care unit; RN coverage; and as expressed by Resident Council, Staff, and 2 family members (FM-D and FM-E) who had concerns about the lack of sufficient nursing staff at the nursing home. Findings include: ASSESSED NEEDS NOT MET: R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assist of two with bed mobility and total assist of two with transfers. The MDS indicated R1 had limited mobility in upper and lower extremity and used a wheelchair for mobility. R1's care plan dated 8/17/23, identified R1 was bariatric had peripheral vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to take immediate action to prevent further potential violations, immediately report alleged violations, ensure written grievance documentation decisions to included; dates, grievance summary, investigation summary, statements, findings, action taken, conclusion, and communication by facility for 1 of 1 resident (R7) who was alleged to have not received staff care for an extended period of time and filed a grievance with facility. Findings include: R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 was severely cognitively impaired had Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R7's Care Plan dated 8/23/23, indicated R7 requires assist of two with activities of daily living, requires two person assist with toileting and peri-care with every incontinent episode as necessary. During interview on 9/12/23 at 8:12 p.m., family member (FM)-F stated she had a camera put in R7's room two to three months ago due to noticing bed wetting and had concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect was reported immediately, within two hours, to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R7) who was alleged to have not received staff care for an extended period of time. Findings include: R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 was severely cognitively impaired had Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R7's Care Plan dated 8/23/23, indicated R7 requires assist of two with activities of daily living, requires two person assist with toileting and peri-care with every incontinent episode as necessary. Review of facility Resident Grievance Form's on R7 indicated the following: -On 8/18/23 Resident Grievance Form filled out by FM-F indicated, R7 was changed on 8/17/23 at 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. and not again until 8/17/23 in the morning she was not touched or changed for nine hours. The grievance form further indicated FM-F stated this was very concerning because she could have fell or passed away…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect for 1 of 1 residents (R7) who was alleged to have not received staff care for an extended period of time. Findings include: R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 was severely cognitively impaired had Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R7's Care Plan dated 8/23/23, indicated R7 requires assist of two with activities of daily living, requires two person assist with toileting and peri-care with every incontinent episode as necessary. During interview on 9/12/23 at 8:12 p.m., family member (FM)-F stated she had a camera put in R7's room two to three months ago due to noticing bed wetting and had concerns she was not getting changed after incontinent episodes of bowel and bladder. FM-F stated she had filled out a grievance forms and gave them to the director of nursing (DON) and the administrator and received no follow up on any of them. FM-F stated the only thing she noticed was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for 1 of 1 residents (R8) and bathing as care planned for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R29, R5 and R23) who were dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R8's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact, needed extensive assist of two with toileting and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS further indicated she was not on a toileting plan. R8's Care Plan dated 9/08/23, indicated R8 needed assist of one with toileting, provide peri-care with every incontinent episode as necessary. During observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 4:50 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B stated R8 was last checked and changed at 1:50 p.m. and on the evening shift they like to toilet her every two hours or she was usually very wet with urine. LPN-B stated they only have two nursing assistants (NA) working on the floor and they are both very busy. LPN-B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess 1 of 1 resident (R35) for change of condition upon family request. Findings include: R35's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, end stage renal disease and hypertension. The MDS indicated R35 required extensive assist of two with dressing, bathing, and grooming. R35's care plan dated 7/15/23, indicated at risk for fluid overload, chest pain, weakness and cardiovascular disease. The care plan directed staff to monitor for increased blood pressure, shortness of breath, signs of acute renal failure and to monitor/document and report to the physician. The care plan also indicated R25 had a staph infection to his right knee and was on antibiotics. During interview on 9/11/23 at 7:05 p.m., family member (FM)-B stated on 8/25/23, R35 was not acting like himself and was very confused and was normally alert. FM-B stated R35 stated to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess, develop and implement a person centered dementia care treatment plan for 1 of 2 residents (R10) reviewed who had behaviors related to dementia and multiple resident to resident abuse incidents. Findings include: R10's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had dementia and was severely cognitively impaired, had physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms such as hitting toward others or scratching and pacing. The MDS indicated rejection of care and wandering. R10's care plan dated 8/22/23, indicated R10 had potential for episodes of alteration in mood as evidenced by persistent anger with staff or others, unrealistic fears, sad, crying and hallucinations and delusions. The care plan directed for behavioral psychological consults as indicated, monitor document mood to determine external cause, observe for signs of depression, hopelessness, mania, hypomania, increased irritability, frequent mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an antiparkinson medication was administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 residents (R5) who was provided Carbidopa-Levodopa (assists to relieve Parkinson's disease symptoms) outside of ordered parameters during a medication pass observation. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R5 was moderately cognitively impaired with a diagnosis of dementia and Parkinson's. R5's Order Recap Report identified R5 was ordered the following: -Carbidopa-Levodopa 25/100 mg (milligrams), give two tablets by mouth before meals related to Parkinson's Disease. 1 hour prior to MEALS. R5's September Medication Administration Record (MAR) identified the carbidopa-levodopa was scheduled for AM Pa (morning medication pass), Noon, and PM Pa (evening medication pass). During a medication pass observation on 9/18/23 at 12:15 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A reviewed R5's electronic MAR (eMAR) orders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to fix damaged tile, leaking shower, broken tub in Maple Lane (the only tub that was working in the entire facility). The facility received a citation for this on 3/23/23, and the citation still remains un-fixed. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who resided in the facility who potentially would use the Maple Lane shower/tub room. Findings include: R19's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 was cognitively intact, required limited assistance with personal hygiene and assist of one with bathing. During interview on 9/13/23 at 5:35 p.m., R19 stated she has not received her shower in the past few days and has not received a bath and it would feel really nice to have a bath if the facility had a bathtub. R5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R5 was moderately cognitively impaired required extensive assist with ADL's and one person physical assist with bathing. During interview on 9/13/23 at 5:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident's (R192) reviewed for accidents. Findings Include: Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R192 was cognitively intact and was able to clearly communicate needs and wishes. Further, R192 required extensive assistance of two or more persons for her activities of daily living (ADL's) including bed mobility, transfer, and toileting. R192's care plan revised on 12/27/22, identified self-care deficit requiring assistance with ADL's, and non-weight bearing to left lower extremity, The care plan indicated R192 required two persons assistance for toileting, transfers, bathing, and showering. The Nursing Home Incident Report (NHIR) read as follows: the care plan was being followed correctly at the time of the incident/event. However, the NHIR also read C.N.A took resident to her room after supper. They were doing her normal routine of getting ready for bed brushed teeth and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours a day for a weekend when there was no RN scheduled. Findings include: Review of the facility schedule identified no RN coverage as follows: On 9/09/23 and 9/10/23, the facility had no RN coverage for both days. Interview on 9/11/23 at 2:00 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated she was not aware there was no RN coverage over the weekend but that was probably correct. During interview on 9/12/23 at 3:00 p.m., the human resource director and admissions assistant stated the staffing coordinator has been on a leave of absence and they have been in charge of the scheduling and did not realize they had no RN coverage over the past weekend. Although the RN on-call should have covered those hours. During interview on 9/12/23 at 4:00 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B stated she called the RN on-call and no one answered the phone until finally LPN- E answered and was unable to come in, eventhough she was not even a RN. LPN-B stated it was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,822 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $14,911 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
- $14,911 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-12 for 38 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- CHITAI INVESTMENT, LLC — investment firm · 12.52% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- TECHCARE CORP — investment firm · 12.53% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOLDCO NEW LONDON, MN, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| CHITAI INVESTMENT, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| HOLDCO TABLETOP, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| INVESTCO TABLETOP, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| TECHCARE CORP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| REALCO NEW LONDON, MN, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/13/2025 |
| MANAGERCO NEW LONDON, MN, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/24/2025 |
| CURCIO, DOMINIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| DAVIS, RYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| DOLE, ISAAC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2019 |
| LAKO QUINN, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/10/2025 |
| OLSON, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/14/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $562K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245360. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.