Legacy At Salina
623 S 3rd Street, Salina, KS 67401 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (785) 825-6757 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,868 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.1% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.3% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.5% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.56 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 37.8–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.5–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 39 residents, with three residents sampled for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented fall prevention interventions to prevent a fall for Resident (R) 1. On 10/16/25, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) rolled R1 to her side in bed, and R1 fell out of bed onto the floor. On 10/17/25, after emergency transport for evaluation of R1's complaints of pain, an X-ray revealed R1 had a right femoral neck (top of the thigh bone) fracture (broken bone), which required surgical repair. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record included diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) and a closed fracture of the right distal femur (thigh bone).R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set dated 10/03/25 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living, including bed mobility. R1's Care Plan dated 10/03/23 directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 3 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, and R3 remained free of neglect and abuse. Based on the reasonable person concept, this deficient practice resulted in feelings of belittlement for R1, R2, and R3 and placed all three residents at risk of neglect and the potential for a negative psychosocial impact. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), and urine retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for Resident (R) 1 during a transfer. On 07/04/24, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) M transferred R1 by herself with the sit-to-stand lift. R1's ankle buckled and R1 fell out of the lift sling and sustained a broken left thumb. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for falls, injury, and pain. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/20/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 required the use of a manual wheelchair. The MDS documented R1 had not had any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-05-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance during R14's meals. The facility further failed to identify the unplanned weight loss and implement interventions to prevent further loss. R14 weighed 157.2 pounds on 11/02/21 and 140.8 pounds on 05/06/22 which indicated a significant unplanned weight loss of 10.43 percent (%) in six months. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR ) included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain ) osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional environment for residents, staff, and the public when the facility failed to ensure the sidewalks were as free from trip hazards as possible and/or failed to flag or post alert for the trip hazards while awaiting repair. Findings included:- On 06/29/2026 at 08:30 AM, observation revealed the front entrance sidewalk that leads from the street curb parking to the front sidewalk had a crack that extended from one side of the sidewalk to the other side, approximately three foot long with a one inch open area that appeared to have been filled, but had settled, and the open area still remained uneven. Continued observation revealed the front sidewalk approximately 18 feet from the sidewalk that leads to the front door had a three foot long by two-inch-wide gap in the sidewalk that had a concrete patched with an elevated area, causing an uneven walking surface on the sidewalk. Proceeding from there towards the entrance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 41 residents who reside in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.Findings included:- On 09/08/25 at 12:00 PM, observation of the noon meal consisted of ham, scallop potatoes, peas, and fruit salad. Dietary Staff (DS) BB was observed overseeing the preparation of the noon meal. DS BB would also assist staff with taking meal trays to the residents.On 09/09/25 at 11:30 AM, DS BB verified she was not certified but had passed the course and just needed to take the test. DS BB further stated she had many years in the food service industry. On 09/10/25 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated DS BB had taken her course, but there was a waiting period before she could take the test.The facility's Dietician policy, dated 10/17, documented that a food and nutrition services manager would oversee the production,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to measure and record daily refrigerator and freezer temperatures for the evening shift. This placed the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.Findings included:- On 09/08/25 at 08:00 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, the daily temperature logs for the large silver refrigerator and freezer lacked documentation. Temperatures were not taken during the following days on the evening shift:09/01/2509/03/2509/06/25On 09/08/25 at 08:00 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, the daily temperature logs for the small silver stand-alone refrigerator were not taken during the following days on the evening shift:09/01/2509/03/25On 09/08/25 at 08:00 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, the daily temperature logs for the tan refrigerator lacked documentation; temperatures were not taken during the following days on the evening shift:09/01/2509/03/25On 09/08/25 at 08:45 AM, Dietary BB verified the lack of documentation and stated the temperatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post signage for six of seven residents regarding the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact cares) to ensure staff were aware. This deficient practice placed all residents of the facility at risk for the spread of infections. The facility also failed to ensure staff changed gloves properly during incontinence care for Resident (R) 44, placing the resident at risk for infection. Findings included: - On 09/09/25 at 09:15 AM, observation in six of seven facility identified resident rooms where EBP protocol was to be followed; no EBP signage was found in the room or on the doorway. On 09/08/25 at 11:10 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of EBP signage for residents with EBP precautions and stated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of Resident (R) 4's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) medication. This placed R4 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) drug medications.Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the state agency the allegation of abuse and neglect when R4 slapped another resident. This placed the residents at risk for ongoing abuse and/or mistreatment. Findings included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R4 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R4 required limited assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS recorded R4 received antipsychotic medication during the observation period and had a wander…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote an environment free of hazards for Resident (R) 7, who smoked cigarettes but was not assessed timely for safe smoking practices by the facility, and kept his smoking materials in his nightstand beside his bed. This placed the resident at risk for avoidable injuries and fire-related hazards.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record recorded diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), unsteady gait, and weakness.R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R7 used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample consisted of 12 residents, with two reviewed for urinary catheters (tubes inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain an order for the urinary catheter for one resident, Resident (R) 44, and failed to monitor urinary catheter output for R44 and R35. This placed the residents at risk for catheter-related complications. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R44 documented diagnoses of urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the upper lobe, right bronchus or lung, secondary malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the brain, hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type two. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R44 had intact cognition. R44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date one insulin pen (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) after opening for use. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for ineffective or outdated medication. Findings included: - On 09/08/25 at 08:12 AM, the facility's north medication cart held one Novolog (fast-acting insulin) insulin pen, which was unlabeled and undated. On 09/08/25 at 08:12 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the insulin pen should have been labeled and dated when opened. On 09/10/25 at 01:25 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified that staff were to label and date insulin pens when opened. The facility's Insulin Administration policy, dated September 2014, directed staff to record the expiration date and time on the insulin vial after opening.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for Hospice (specialized care that mainly aims to provide comfort and dignity to the patients, by providing physical comfort and emotional, social, and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure collaboration between the hospice provider and the facility for one resident, Resident (R) 44, who was admitted to hospice on 08/28/25. This placed the resident at risk of inadequate end-of-life care.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R44 documented diagnoses of urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the upper lobe, right bronchus or lung, secondary malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the brain, hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Quarter 4 indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staff.On 09/09/24 at 03:30 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility would complete the quarterly PBJ data and then would send that information to corporate, then corporate would send that collected information to Prime View, which is a data collection program, and that was the final information that was submitted to the PBJ data. Administrative Staff A verified the facility had adequate staffing during the 2024 Quarter 4 and stated they were unsure how it was incorrectly submitted. The Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (PBJ) policy, dated August 2022, documented that direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 3 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported an allegation of potential abuse and neglect to the administrator. Resident (R)1 reported an allegation of potential abuse and neglect to Licensed Nurse G, after Certified Nurse Aide M did not provide assistance to R1 for urinary care and R1 had a soaked brief. LN G did not report the incident to administrative staff. This failure placed R1 at risk for continued neglect. Findings Included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), and urine retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 41 residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 01/02/24 at 08:10 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed: One unsealed unlabeled plastic bag of tater tot patties, one unsealed unlabeled plastic bag of tater tots, and one bag of unsealed, unlabeled plastic bag of chicken strips in the white upright freezer. The outside of the refrigerator freezer had numerous different-sized areas of blackish substance. Inside the refrigerator were numerous different-sized specks of food particles on the door shelves, below the bottom drawers, and the top and middle compartments of the door. The walk-in refrigerator had an open box with an uncovered bunch of celery which had a white substance on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable, and homelike environment in the dining room. This placed the residents at risk of an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: - On 01/02/24 at 11:35 AM, observation in the dining room revealed the floor throughout the dining room had blackish gray build up and the floor tile located next to the heater had an approximately four-inch wide by a nine-inch long missing piece of tile. On 01/04/24 at 10:40 AM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U verified the above findings and stated he had not waxed the dining room floor because the facility was going to replace it, but he did not know when. On 01/04/24 at 10:58 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the dining room floor had not been waxed for a while and stated the facility was going to purchase new flooring, so staff had not waxed the old one. Administrative Staff A said the facility received one estimate but felt like it was high; the facility then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of chemical hazards for five cognitively impaired independently mobile residents and failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident (R) 33. The deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents, falls, and related injuries. Findings included: - On 01/03/24 At 08:07 AM observation revealed a bottle of Windex Multi-Surface Cleaner and Lime Away bottles sitting on an open shelf below the fish aquarium. The Lime Away bottle was labeled to keep out of reach of children. On 01/03/24 at 08:09 AM, Administrative Nurse D, stated one of the residents cleaned the aquarium and placed the cleaning agents under the aquarium, and left them there. Administrative Nurse D verified the cleaning agents should not have been left under the aquarium and took them to have them locked up. The facility's Storage Areas,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals for two medication storage carts placing the residents at risk for missing medications and unsafe access to medications. Findings included: - On 01/02/24 at 10:39 AM, observation revealed a treatment/medication cart in the living room area was unattended and unlocked. The unlocked drawers contained insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) for four different residents. Licensed Nurse H verified the cart should be locked when unattended. On 01/03/24 at 12:09 PM, observation revealed a medication cart in the living room area unattended and unlocked. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R verified the medication cart should be locked when unattended. On 01/04/24 at 01:00 PM, observation revealed Resident (R) 5 in a wheelchair in the dining room attempting to open drawers on the medication cart. On 01/08/24 at 10:58 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the medication carts should be locked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices related to point of care testing for COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory virus) and also failed to sanitize a resident's walker after it was used by another resident who had not been feeling well. This placed the residents at risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - On 01/03/24 at 07:45 AM, observation revealed Resident (R)25 stated she did not feel well and refused her medication. At 10:07 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N placed R33's silver walker in front of R25 and told her to hold onto the walker to stand up. CNA N had R25 pivot turn and sit down in her wheelchair. At 02:30 PM, observation revealed R33 sat in her wheelchair with a gait belt around her waist in the bathroom. With Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M on her right side and CNA P on her left, staff assisted her to stand. CNA M pulled down R33's pants and incontinence brief and assisted her to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-08 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide adequate lighting in the main dining room. This put the residents at risk of not being able to see and enjoy their meals. Findings included: - On 01/02/24 at 11:35 AM, observation in the dining room revealed: A ceiling fan light fixture had three burnt-out light bulbs. A fluorescent ceiling light, approximately three feet by 18 inches had burnt-out light bulbs. On 01/04/24 at 10:40 AM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U verified the above light issues and stated he had not had time to replace the bulbs. The facility's Maintenance Service Policy, revised in December 2009, documented that maintenance service would be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The maintenance department was responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner. The facility failed to provide adequate lighting in the main dining room for the residents who ate their meals there. This placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 30 had a physician's order and was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications left at the bedside. This placed R30 at risk for improper use of medication and related side effects. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R30 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). R30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R30 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R30 independent with activities of daily living (ADLs). R30's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to honor Resident (R) 4's preference to receive three showers per week. This placed R4 at risk for decreased self-determination and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had intact cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance with showering, toileting, supervision with personal hygiene, and dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three reviewed for Medicare Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident (or their representative) a fully completed Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for skilled services for Resident (R) 17, R31, and R36 which included the estimated cost of services. This placed the resident at risk for uninformed care decisions. Findings included: -The Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services and provided a cost estimate of continued services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified therapy listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I am responsible for payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services. (3) I do not want the listed therapy services. The facility lacked documentation R17 was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for bathing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services as care planned for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 4. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had intact cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance with showering, toileting, supervision with personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for Residents (R) 38, and R31 when staff failed to store their oxygen tubing and cannula in a sanitary manner when not in use. This placed the residents at risk for an infection. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R38 had diagnoses of heart failure, hemiplegia of the non-dominant side (paralysis of one side of the body), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R38's admission 5-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition and required partial assistance for ambulation, was dependent upon staff for transfers, partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene, upper functional impairment on one side, and lower functional impairment both sides. The assessment further documented R38 required oxygen use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a trauma-informed care assessment for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 1, who had behaviors and past traumatic events in her life. This placed the resident at risk for unmet behavioral health needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), personality disorder (a consistently dysfunctional pattern of thinking and behavior that reflects suspicion or lack of interest in others), panic disorder (frequent and unexpected panic attacks), and schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing one resident's pureed diet. This placed the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings included: - On 01/03/24 at 11:30 AM Dietary Staff (DS) DD, with Dietary Manager (DM) BB overlooking, stated the facility had one resident who received a pureed diet. DS BB washed hands, applied gloves, placed one four-ounce piece of twice-baked chicken into a blender container then added two ounces (oz) of brown gravy, and blended. DS DD reported it was not the right consistency, added one-half oz brown gravy, and blended to the consistency of pudding. DS DD poured it into a custard bowl and placed it on the counter. DS DD used a new blender container, placed four ounces of country vegetables into the blender container, and added two oz. of liquid from the vegetables, blended to the consistency of pudding, poured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents with one kitchen and one dining room. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sanitary food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings Include: - On 05/23/22 at 07:08AM an initial walk-through of the kitchen's food storage area was completed. The walkthrough revealed that the floors in the storage areas were sticky in front of the dry food storage area. Upon inspection of the kitchen's walk-in freezer unit, open but undated bags of fries, chicken strips, potato tots, hash browns, peas, and chicken bites were observed. The freezer unit blower vent had visible dust and lint buildup covering the vents blowing towards the food stored in the unit. Inspection of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator unit revealed an open but undated bag of tortillas. The refrigerator unit blower vent had visible dust and lint buildup covering the vents blowing towards the food stored in the unit. Inspection of the dry good storage rack outside the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan related to bladder incontinence for Resident (R) 10, R16, and R30 and failed in the development of person-centered care plan related to monitoring of antihypertensive medication for R31. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of not achieving and/or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R10's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), overactive bladder (a frequent and sudden urge to urinate that may be difficult to control), and stress incontinence (is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide scheduled weekend activities. This placed the residents at risk for boredom and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - On 05/25/22 at 10:30 AM, during resident council meeting, the four present resident council members voiced a concern regarding the lack of scheduled resident activities on the weekends. Review of the February, March, April and May 2022 Activity Calendars revealed no scheduled resident activities for the weekends. The calendars documented family and friend visits as resident activities. On 05/25/22 at 1:12 PM, Activity Z verified the facility had no scheduled activities on the weekends for the residents and stated she would set up dominos and scrabble in the living area for resident who wanted to play them. Activity Z stated she was employed with the facility since February 2022;she was working on getting more scheduled activities on the weekend. On 05/31/22 at 10:30 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the failure to monitor antihypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]), failure to follow physician ordered parameters for monitoring of antihypertensive medication, the lack of behavior monitoring on psychotropic (medications which alter mood or thoughts) medications and the lack of a stop date for an as needed antidepressant. These deficient practices placed Resident(R) 10, R31, R16, R33 and R14 at increased risk for side effects of unnecessary medications or complications. Findings included: - R10's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to wear a mask inside the facility, left uncovered clean laundry in a cart in the hall, and hung Resident (R) 187's personal clothing on the hand rail outside her room. The facility further failed to ensure visitors to isolation room wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE). The facility further failed to ensure staff followed infection control principles during COVID (highly contagious, potentially fatal respiratory infection) test. This placed the 37 residents at risk for infection. Findings included: - On 05/23/22 at 07:07 AM an unidentified facility staff member who was not wearing a mask answered the facility door and allowed the survey team to enter. A sign posted at the entrance directed a mask must be worn at all times in the facilty. On 05/24/22 at 03:56 PM, observation revealed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure R10's right to be treated with respect, dignity, related to bladder incontinence when the facility staff referred to residents as heavy wetters and placed cloth incontinent pads in R10's wheelchair. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased autonomy and dignity. Findings included: - R10's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), overactive bladder (a frequent and sudden urge to urinate that may be difficult to control), and stress incontinence (is the unintentional loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of the residents reviewed for discharge that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post discharge pan for Resident (R) 38. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/09/22, documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, walk in room, limited staff assistance with walk in corridor, locomotion on and off unit, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R38 required supervision with eating. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent assistance and supervision with eating for Resident (R)14. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for weight loss. Findings Included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R14: hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain ) osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), hypertension (high blood pressure), and retention of urine (lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 14's bowel movements and treat when indicated per physician orders which placed R14 at risk for digestive problems, impaired comfort, and bowel blockage. Findings included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with two residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed ensure fall interventions were implemented as care planned for Resident (R)16, which placed her at risk of major injury from falls Findings included: - R16's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), history of falls, unsteady on feet, depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R16 required extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R10's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), overactive bladder (a frequent and sudden urge to urinate that may be difficult to control), and stress incontinence (is the unintentional loss of urine). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R10 required extensive assistance of two staff members for activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS documented R10 was not on a toileting plan. The MDS documented R10 received insulin (medication to regulate blood sugar), antidepressant medication (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression), anticoagulant medication (class of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed ensure consistent respiratory care for Residents (R)13 and R32. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications due to respiratory therapy. Findings Included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R13: colitis (inflammation of the large intestine, characterized by severe diarrhea and ulceration of the large intestine), urge incontinence (involuntary passage of urine occurring soon after a strong sense of urgency to void), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder ( progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/22/22 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for dialysis services (process of filtering and purifying blood using machines) . Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent care and services including communication between the facility and dialysis center for Resident (R)30. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for complications related to dialysis services. Findings include: - The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R30: chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease (ERSD-- a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to the kidneys), atherosclerotic heart disease (hardening and narrowing of the blood vessels of the heart), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor for Resident (R) 10's antihypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]) and failed to follow physician ordered parameters for monitoring of antihypertensive medication for R31 and R16. These deficient practices had the risk for side effects of unnecessary medications or complications. Findings included: - R10's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), overactive bladder (a frequent and sudden urge to urinate that may be difficult to control), and stress incontinence (is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 37. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement behavioral monitoring associated with antidepressant medications (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of intense sadness, hopelessness and suicidal thoughts) and the facility failed to implement a discontinuation date (stop date) for as needed psychotropic ( medications which alter thoughts or mood) medication for Residents (R) 14, R31 and R33. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and unnecessary side effects from psychotropic medications. Fingings lncluded: -The electronic medical records (EMR) indicated the following diagnoses for R14: hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (sudden death of brain cells due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-05-26 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff nursing schedule was posted for two of three days of the onsite survey. This placed the residents at risk for not knowing how many staff would be providing them care. Findings included: - On 05/25/22 (Wednesday) at 08:00 AM, observation revealed the posted daily staffing schedule for 05/24/22 (Tuesday). On 05/26/22 (Thursday) at 08:42 AM, observation revealed the posted daily staffing schedule was dated 05/25/22 (Wednesday). On 05/25/22 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the daily nurse staffing schedule was not posted for the correct day and stated the night nurse was responsible for making out the nurse staffing schedule for the correct day and it should be posted daily including weekends. On 5/26/22 at 08:42 AM, Administrative Staff B verified the daily nurse staffing schedule was not posted for the correct day and stated the night nurse should make out the daily staffing schedule sheet and post it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,868 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $9,568 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
- $8,190 — penalty dated 2024-07-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- NKERO INVESTMENTS LTD LLP — investment firm · 9.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KS PORTFOLIO MASTER SNF HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| NKERO INVESTMENTS LTD LLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 03/01/2020 |
| KS PORTFOLIO INVESTOR, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| KS PORTFOLIO MASTER HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| KS PORTFOLIO SPONSOR, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| ADAMS, JOHN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| DOLE, ISAAC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| FISHFELD, JORDAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| KERO, SAMEER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| MENDELOVITZ, ISIDORE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| TOLIA, KIRIT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| TOLIA, SANJAY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| TOLIA, VINAY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| SALINA WINDSOR SNF REALCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| KS PORTFOLIO MANAGER, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| IRVIN, BRADLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| RODRIGUEZ, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| SEEGER, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $360K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175127. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.