No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Legacy At Herington

2 E Ash Street, Herington, KS 67449 · For profit - Individual · 45 certified beds · (785) 258-2283 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (98%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6 S Broadway · (785) 258-2777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2 W Main St · (785) 258-3703 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
119 N Broadway St · (785) 258-3213 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Herington Reservoir · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%17.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.6%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.0%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.2%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.9%18.1%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.831.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.022.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
97.6%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 25.2 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-31)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample include 17 residents with one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 remained free from neglect when facility staff failed to transfer R7 as required by R7's plan of care. On 04/21/23 R7, who required extensive assistance of two staff and a full body lift, slipped forward in her wheelchair. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N called out to non-CNA staff (Dietary Staff CC) to assist with repositioning R7 in the wheelchair. CNA N and Dietary Staff CC lifted R7 by her upper arms and pulled R7 back in the wheelchair without the use of the full body lift. During this action, R7's left shoulder made a loud popping noise, which CNA O, who sat at a nearby table, heard. None of the three staff, CNA N, CNA O, or Dietary Staff CC reported the incident to the charge nurse or Administrative Nurse D. On 04/24/23, R7's left shoulder was swollen and painful. An X-ray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample include 17 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 7 remained free from preventable accidents when the facility staff failed to transfer R7 as required by R7's plan of care. On 04/21/23 R7, who required extensive assistance of two staff and a full body lift, slipped forward in her wheelchair. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N called out to non-CNA staff (Dietary Staff CC) to assist with repositioning R7 in the wheelchair. CNA N and Dietary Staff CC lifted R7 by her upper arms and pulled R7 back in the wheelchair without the use of the full body lift. During this action, R7's left shoulder made a loud popping noise, which CNA O, who sat at a nearby table, heard. None of the three staff, CNA N, CNA O, or Dietary Staff CC reported the incident to the charge nurse or Administrative Nurse D. On 04/24/23, R7's left shoulder was swollen and painful. An X-ray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 31 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 10/29/24 at 08:30 AM, observation revealed dietary staff in the kitchen prepared the breakfast meal. On 10/29/24 at 09:40 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated the facility had six residents with mechanical soft diets and three with a pureed diet. On 10/31/24 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB, the dietary manager, was not certified. The facility's Dietician policy, dated 10/2017, documented a qualified, competent, and skilled dietician would help oversee the food and nutrition services in the facility. A food and nutrition services manager would oversee the production, storage, and delivery of food. The dietician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The facility had one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the residents in the facility, who receive their meals from the kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 10/29/24 at 8:45 AM, during the initial tour, observation revealed a one three foot by six-inch air vent grill located above the North door entrance to the kitchen was covered with a brownish grease/sticky substance and a gray fuzzy substance blowing directly on the food preparation area. Continued observation revealed two florescent light fixtures, approximately six inches by two feet located in the exhaust hood above the stovetop. One of the florescent covers was missing and exposed the florescent bulb and the other cover was partially affixed to the light fixture. On 10/29/24 at 09:15 AM, observation revealed nine ceiling-mounted fluorescent light fixtures approximately 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter (Q) 4 indicated no licensed nurse coverage on eight days. The PBJ for FY 2024 Q4 recorded no licensed nurse coverage on the following dates: 07/29/23, 07/30/23, 09/09/23, 09/10/3, 09/11/23, 09/2/23, 09/28/23, and 09/29/23. The PBJ report provided by CMS for FY 2024 Q3 indicated no licensed nurse coverage on eight days. The PBJ for FY 2024 Q3 recorded no licensed nurse coverage on the following dates: 05/12/24, 05/13/24, 05/15/24, 05/16/24, 05/17/24, 05/18/24, 05/19/24, and 05/22/24. The PBJ report provided by CMS for FY 2024 Q1 indicated no licensed nurse coverage on six days. The PBJ for FY 2024 Q1 recorded no licensed nurse coverage on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to provide care for Resident (R)26 and R8 in a manner that protected and promoted resident dignity. This placed the residents at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - On 10/29/24 at 11:15 AM, observation revealed R26 sat in a wheelchair right outside the medication room, in between the dining room and the common hall. Licensed Nurse (LN) G obtained R26's blood sugar reading using a glucometer (an instrument used to calculate blood glucose) from R26's right index finger. LN G then stated to the resident Your blood sugar reading is 277. Continued observation revealed ten residents were seated in the dining room awaiting lunch to be served, while staff and other residents were in the hallways adjacent to the medication room. Ongoing observation revealed LN G lifted R26's shirt and administered insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of Resident (R)25's facility-initiated discharge to the hospital. This placed R25 at risk for impaired rights. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH-serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain.) R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] recorded that R25 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R25 required staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS recorded the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for toileting. Based on observation, record review, and interview, The facility failed to revise the care plan to address the toileting needs of one resident, Resident (R) 2. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), pain in the thoracic spine (the middle section of the spine, located between the cervical spine (neck) and the lumbar spine (low back), and hyperthyroidism (a condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 had severely impaired cognition. R2 was independent with mobility and ambulation. R2 required supervision with showers, upper and lower body dressing, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, including bathing and toileting for Resident (R)2. This placed the resident at risk for poor personal hygiene and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), pain in the thoracic spine (the middle section of the spine, located between the cervical spine (neck) and the lumbar spine (low back), and hyperthyroidism (a condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 had severely impaired cognition. R2 was independent with mobility and ambulation. R2 required supervision with showers, upper and lower body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately respond to Resident (R)2's complaints of pain. This placed R2 at risk for unresolved pain and discomfort. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), pain in the thoracic spine (the middle section of the spine, located between the cervical spine (neck) and the lumbar spine (low back), and hyperthyroidism (a condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 had severely impaired cognition. R2 required supervision for showers, personal hygiene, upper and lower dressing, and oral hygiene. The MDS documented R2 had no scheduled or as-needed pain medication. R2's Care Plan, dated 08/09/24 and initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of an appropriate indication, or the required physician documentation, for Resident (R) 25's antipsychotic (medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality) medication. The facility further failed to ensure the CP identified and reported irregularities in R14's blood sugar monitoring. This placed the residents at risk for physical decline, ineffective medication regimen, and side effects from unnecessary medication. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide interventions for bowel management for Resident (R) 18 and failed to notify the physician of blood sugars outside of physician-ordered parameters for R14. This placed the residents at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (ER) for R18 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), a need for assistance with personal care, and constipation (difficulty passing stools). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R18 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication or a documented physician rationale which included the unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of Resident (R)25's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) medication. This placed R25 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) drug medications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH-serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R)6, R14, and R26s' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens with opened and discard dates. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 10/29/24 at 09:00 AM, observation of the facility's treatment cart revealed the following: R6's Basaglar (long-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an open or discard date. R14's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an open or discard date. R26's Basaglar flex pen was not labeled with an open or discard date. On 10/29/24 at 08:35 AM, License Nurse (LN) G verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened and the expiration date. On 10/30/24 at 08:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the flex pens with the date opened and the expiration date. Medlineplus.gov directs open,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to correctly prepare a pureed diet for three residents that retained both nutritive value and palatability. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition or decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 10/30/24 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed the lunch meal included cheesy macaroni hamburger helper, carrots, pears, and garlic bread. On 10/30/24 at 10:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC prepared three pureed diets. DS CC placed three servings of cheesy macaroni hamburger helper in the Robot-coup blender (a food processor) and added four ounces of beef base. DS CC blended the macaroni to a thin consistency and emptied the blended food into a metal pan and placed the pan into the hot water well in the hot holding cart. Observation revealed DS CC then placed three - four-ounce servings of pears in the Robot coup, with four squirts of simply thick easy mix and blended the food to a pureed texture. DS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 30 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 was treated with dignity. This deficient practice placed R3 at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being and decreased dignity and self-worth. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (an emergency condition in which a blood vessel in the brain ruptures and causes bleeding inside the brain). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/16/24 documented that R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 02/26/24, documented R3 had physical and verbal behaviors directed at staff. R3's Care Plan dated 11/15/23, documented R3's preference to vape (using a device to inhale an aerosol, typically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 30 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for visitation rights. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents (R) 1 and R2 were able to exercise their right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of the residents' choice. This deficient practice placed R1 and R2 at risk for impaired resident rights, impaired psychosocial well-being, and social isolation. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and weakness. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/05/23, documented that R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Quarterly MDS dated 01/05/24, documented R1 had a BIMS score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia (progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0564 — isolated
    Inform each resident of his or her visitation rights and ensure that all visitors enjoy equal visitation privileges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 30 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for visitation rights. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 1 and R2 and/or their representative of their visitation rights and any visitation restrictions placed on them. This deficient practice placed R1 and R2 at risk for impaired resident rights, impaired psychosocial well-being, and social isolation. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and weakness. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/05/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Quarterly MDS dated 01/05/24, documented R1 had a BIMS score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia (progressive mental disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from verbal abuse. On 09/18/23 at approximately 07:30 PM, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) M and CNA N were transferring R1 with a full lift from R1's wheelchair to her recliner. During the transfer, R1 began swatting at CNA M and CNA M yelled at R1 and caalled her a derogatory name.This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for psychosocial impairment due to the verbal abuse. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record documented R1 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and need for assistance with personal care. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated 08/10/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of twelve which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported verbal abuse to the facility administrator (LNHA). On 09/18/23 at approximately 07:30 PM, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) M and CNA N were transferring R1 with a full lift from R1's wheelchair to her recliner. During the transfer, R1 began swatting at CNA M and CNA M yelled at R1 and called her a derogatory name. CNA N did not report the incident until 09/19/23 in an e-mail to the Human Resources GG. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for further mistreatment and psychosocial impairment. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record documented R1 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and need for assistance with personal care. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated 08/10/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a certified dietary manager (CDM). This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs. Findings included: - On 05/17/23 at 11:50 AM Administrative Staff A stated that Dietary BB was currently enrolled in class to become their CDM; she reported that the facility did not currently have a CDM. She further stated that the facility's registered dietitian comes to the facility about once per month. On 05/22/23 at 11:33 AM Dietary BB stated that the facility's registered dietitian comes to the facility once a month. He further stated that he can call the dietitian when needed for assistance. The facility failed to provide a policy related to a CDM. The facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services was a certified dietary manager. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk for unmet dietary and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to equipment testing and storage of kitchenware. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 05/17/23 at 07:42 AM an observation revealed plates and bowls stored on top of a cart were not covered or inverted. On 05/17/23 at 07:43 AM an observation revealed plates and bowls stored in a metal bin under a table. The dishes were stored below waist level and the side of the bin was open leaving the plates and bowls exposed. The plates and bowls were uncovered and not inverted. On 05/17/23 at 07:45 AM review of the Dish Machine and Temperature Log for April 2023 revealed a lack of evidence that dishwasher temperatures were monitored for 79 out of 90 scheduled times. Review of the Dish Machine and Temperature Log for May 2023 revealed a lack of evidence that dishwasher temperatures were monitored for 17 out of 51…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for the 32 residents who reside in the facility. Findings included: The facility failed to ensure a surety bond was in place to protect resident's trust accounts. This deficient practice placed 30 residents at risk for complication related to monetary issues. (Refer to F570) The facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 remained free from neglect when facility staff failed to provide the necessary number of qualified staff members along with the required medical equipment to provide appropriate assistive cares for R7. (Refer to F600) The facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the transfer to the hospital for R16 or her representative. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk of delayed care. (Refer to F623) The facility failed to ensure staff provided and documented consistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program to develop corrective actions plans and monitor them to correct identified quality deficiencies prior to survey. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective care. Findings Included: The facility failed to ensure a surety bond was in place to protect resident's trust accounts. This deficient practice placed 30 residents at risk for complication related to monetary issues. (Refer to F570) The facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 remained free from neglect when facility staff failed to provide the necessary number of qualified staff members along with the required medical equipment to provide appropriate assistive cares for R7. (Refer to F600) The facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the transfer to the hospital for R16 or her representative. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk of delayed care. (Refer to F623) The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-22 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) team meet quarterly with the required personnel in attendance. This deficient practice placed all the residents at risk for ineffective care. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) team meeting sign-in sheet indicated a QAPI meetings were held 02/08/22, 03/08/22, 04/12/22, 07/27/22, and 10/26/22. The facility was unable to provide documentation showing meetings held after October 2022. The review indicated no quality measures, concerns, monitoring, performance improvement plans (PIPs), or QAPI guidance/education occurred after 10/26/22. On 05/22/23 at 04:10PM Administrative Staff A reported that she was not aware she was supposed to be running the QAPI program at the facility. She reported the facility will have a QAPI meeting on 05/24/23. She stated that going forward the facility will meet monthly and quarterly to identify facility concerns and create…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the principles of antibiotic stewardship were followed to ensure antibiotics were used in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in an ongoing, proactive manner when the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to document and maintain an accurate antibiotic stewardship log monthly. This placed the residents who resided in the facility at risk for unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Findings included: - Review of the facilities Infection Control Tracking Log for tracking and trending infections from January 2022 through May 2023, revealed lack of Infection Control Logs for May 2022 was missing. The November 2022 and December 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, April 2023 logs lacked any infection/antibiotic tracking. The Infection Control logs reviewed had incomplete data for analysis of adherence with an evidenced-based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Five residents were reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) care. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent bathing cares for Resident (R) 29, R7, R11, and R30 who required extensive assistance from staff with bathing. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications due to poor personal hygiene and impaired psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of hypertension (an elevated blood pressure), renal insufficiency (poor function of the kidneys that may be due to a reduction in blood-flow to the kidneys), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R29 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated severely impaired cognition. R29 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents sampled for medication review. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure the monthly Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were addressed/followed up by the physician and facility staff for the five residents sampled for medication review. Resident (R) 5, R9, R12, R29, and R30's chart lacked physician responses to the monthly pharmacy recommendations. This placed the residents at risk for complcations related to unecessary medications. Findings included: - Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R5, R9, R12, R29, and R30 lacked evidence that monthly medication regimen review (MRR) were addressed by the physicians and facilty staff. The facility was unable to provide the CP's MRR's including recomemndations since the last onsite annual survey on 09/27/21. On 05/22/23 at 02:56 PM Administrative Nurse F stated that on 05/13/23 the pharmacist came to the facility to do the monthly MRR. Administrative Nurse F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff cleaned/sanitized shared equipment after each use. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff placed a protective barrier down when using a glucometer (a medical device used to measure the approximate concentration of glucose in the blood). The facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene while providing care to residents. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for increased infection and transmission of communicable disease. Findings included: - An observation on 05/18/23 at 07:36 AM revealed Administrative Nurse D entered Resident (R) 5's room to obtain his fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS). Administrative Nurse D placed items on the bedside table without placing a barrier down. Administrative Nurse D donned gloves that were in her scrub top pocket; she cleansed R5's finger with an alcohol wipe, then applied the lancet (a device that punctures the skin to obtain a blood sample). She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with three reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents(R)2, R19 and R30 were treated in a dignified manner during meal service. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: On 05/17/23 at 11:40AM R2, R19, and R30 were in the dining room eating lunch. An unidentified staff stood at the table supervising and providing meal assistance with feeding. The staff member held R2's fork and fed R2 her food while standing over her. R2 complained the food was stuck in her upper denture but staff continued to insist she take a bite of her food. While feeding R2, the staff member told R19 to keep eating his meal while she stood over R2. The unidentified staff member moved over to R30 and fed him while standing. From 11:45AM to 11:53AM, during the meal, the staff member left the residents unattended to go to the nursing office. At 11:53 Activities Staff Z arrived in the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with three residents reviewed for notice requirements before transfer/discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R)11 or her representative. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of overactive bladder (a frequent and sudden urge to urinate that may be difficult to control), artificial openings of urinary tract status, neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system, and multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent /heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide physician ordered pressure reducing devices for Resident (R) 10 who had an unstageable pressure injury (base of the sore is covered by a thick layer of other tissue and pus that may be yellow, grey, green, brown, or black) to the right heel. This deficient practice placed R10 at increased risk of development and or worsening of pressure related injuries for R10. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), weakness, need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) or mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify and resolve inappropriate wheelchair positioning for Resident (R)12. This placed R12 at risk for loss of independence, and impaired mobility. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, and abnormal gait. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for bowel/bladder incontinence and nephrostomy tube (an artificial opening between the kidney and the skin which allows urine to drain from the body). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate hand hygiene during peri-care for Resident (R) 11 who had a foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and history of sepsis (a systemic reaction that develops when the chemicals in the immune system release into the blood stream to fight an infection which cause inflammation throughout the entire body instead. Severe cases of sepsis can lead to the medical emergency, septic shock) and urinary tract infections (UTI). The facility also failed to evaluate and provide an individualized toileting plan for R7. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk increased infections, catheter related problems, and impaired dignity. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with four reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed toprovide consistent support during meal services for Resident (R) 19, who had unintended weight loss. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for further weight loss and impaired nutrition. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R19's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and chronic kidney disease. A review of R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/27/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R19 weighed 178 pounds (lbs.). the MDS indicated no weight loss. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 resident. The sample included 17 residents with one Resident (R) sampled for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure R10 received her supplemental oxygen (O2) continuously as physician ordered. The facility failed to ensure that R10's O2 tubing and nasal cannula (NC-a hollow tube that helps provide supplemental oxygen) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP-machine used to deliver a stream of oxygenated air into the airways through a mask and a tube) mask and tubing were properly stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk for increased respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R10 documented diagnoses of lung transplant (a surgical procedure where the diseased lung is replaced with a healthy lung(s) from a donor.) The admission Minimum Data Set dated 04/24/23 documented R10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Five residents were sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 29's pulse before administration of the beta blocker (a type of medicine that makes the heart beat more slowly and lower blood pressure) metoprolol (a beta blocker medication used to treat heart conditions). This deficient practice place R29 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of hypertension (an elevated blood pressure), renal insufficiency (poor function of the kidneys that may be due to a reduction in blood-flow to the kidneys), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R29 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0779 — isolated
    Keep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered diagnostic laboratory test results were signed and scanned into the clinical record for Resident (R) 10 and R12. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under Miscellaneous tab revealed a laboratory test obtained on 05/11/23 had been scanned into the clinical record on 05/14/23 but was not signed and dated. R12's EMR lacked evidence of any laboratory results scanned into the clinical record since 2021. On 05/22/23 at 02:30 PM the facility provided laboratory tests for R12 that had been obtained on 04/13/23 that were dated and signed but not scanned into the EMR. On 05/22/23 at 02:30 PM the facility provided results of laboratory tests that had been obtained 05/03/23 for R12 and not scanned into the EMR. The test results lack a physician signature and was undated. On 05/22/23 at 02:57 PM Administrative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five sample residents reviewed for influenza (a contagious respiratory illness that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) and pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) immunizations. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that sampled Resident (R) 29 and R30 that had consented to receive the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine were administered the vaccinations. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and pneumococcal disease. Findings included: - Review of R29's Immunization tab in the EMR and a copy of R29's Influenza Immunization Informed Consent dated 09/2010 documented R29's representative signed the form on 11/15/22 for R29 to receive the Influenza Vaccine. R29 did not receive the influenza vaccine. Review of R29's Immunization tab in the EMR and a copy of R29's Pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-22 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents sampled for COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by coronavirus, capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed toassess and document the COVID-19 vaccination status for Resident (R) 30. The facility failed to offer and obtain signed consents or declinations for COVID-19 vaccinations for R30. This deficient practice had the risk for physical complications and the risk to spread illness among residents, a high-risk population. Findings included: - R30 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R30's clinical record lacked evidence of the COVID-19 vaccination status or evidence the vaccination was offered including a signed consent or declination of the vaccination. On 05/18/23 at 02:30 PM Administrative Staff B stated the local pharmacy provided all the vaccinations to the residents. Administrative Staff B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 20 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for Medicare Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident (or their representative) the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for skilled services for Resident (R) 2, R7, and R11. Findings included: - The Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay future skilled therapy services and provided a cost estimate of continued services. The form included option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified therapy listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I am responsible for payment, but can appeal Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services. (3) I do not want the listed therapy services. The facility lacked documentation R2 had been provided with Center of Medicare (CMS)-10055 form when the resident skilled services ended 05/21/21, which informed the resident (or their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 20 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services when they failed to ensure staff stored oxygen delivery devices in a sanitary manner for Resident (R) 7. Findings included: - R7's electronic medical record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of four which indicated impaired cognition. R7 required extensive assistance from staff for all activities of daily living and wore oxygen during the look back period. The Care Plan dated 07/14/21 directed staff that episodes of increased confusion could be a sign of low oxygen level. It directed staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 20 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform adequate infection control during wound care for two residents, Resident (R) 7, R14 and toileting for R10. Findings included: - On 09/22/21 at 03:10 PM, observation revealed Administrative Nurse D used hand gel and a paper towel to wipe off R14's bedside table and set a clean cover on the table for her supplies. Administrative Nurse D washed her hands and put on gloves, set out her wound care supplies, and cleaned the scissors with alcohol. Administrative Nurse D used scissors to remove the moderately soiled dressing. R14's left heel had a large black eschar (dead skin) area. Administrative Nurse D cleansed the heel with foaming wound cleanser and gauze several times, removed her soiled gloves, and donned clean gloves without washing her hands. Administrative Nurse D cleaned R14's left toe wounds with wound cleanser and gauze, changed gloves without washing her hands, and applied a wound treatment with a new gauze for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-31 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to display current daily nursing staff hours. Findings included: - On 10/29/24 and 10/30/24, observation revealed the posted nurse staff hours were dated 10/28/24 and did not display the correct daily nursing staff information. On 10/31/24 at 12:30 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated the night shift nurse was responsible for posting the daily nurse staffing hours and verified the nurse hours for 10/29/24 and 10/30/24 had not been posted. The facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy, dated 07/16, documented the facility would post, daily for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. When computing hours of direct-care staff working split shifts, count only the total number of hours the individual was scheduled to work for the shift information being posted. The facility failed to display current daily nursing hour information as required.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KS PORTFOLIO MASTER SNF HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
KS PORTFOLIO INVESTOR, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
KS PORTFOLIO MASTER HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
KS PORTFOLIO SPONSOR, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
NKERO INVESTMENTS LTD LLPOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
DOLE, ISAACIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
FISHFELD, JORDANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
MENDELOVITZ, ISIDOREIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
TOLIA, KIRITIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
TOLIA, SANJAYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
TOLIA, VINAYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
HERINGTON REALCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2015
CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
KS PORTFOLIO MANAGER, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2025
AUSTIN, FELICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2023
BRYANT, RODNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
BUSH, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2024
SEEGER, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$335K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 6%Other / private 30%

This home reported $335K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$317per resident / day
operating cost
$9,643per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175490. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next