Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Jefferson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 44.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #18 and #10) for falls. 1. Resident #18 fell two times and the facility failed to either put an intervention in place or put an inadequate intervention in place to prevent future falls. After Resident #18 fell on 7/8/23, the facility requested a urinalysis on 7/12/23. The facility collected and received the results on 7/14/23 that revealed a urinary tract infection. The provider ordered to wait for the culture and sensitivity (C&S) results then update them with the results. Resident #18 attempted to get up on her own multiple times, with the staff intervening to prevent her from falling. On 7/18/23 a staff member left Resident #18 unattended in the bathroom with the call light and instructions to pull it when she was ready. Without using the call light, Resident #18 attempted to get to bed by herself…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility investigation review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent a resident to resident altercation for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #1 was independent with bed mobility and all transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of non-alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. The Care Plan with a target date of 5/27/26 documented Resident #1 may have episodes of behaviors and potential for behaviors as evidenced by being combative, negative verbalizations, name calling, refusal of medications/care, resistance to care, attempts to leave building, crying episodes, screaming out, attention seeking behaviors,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to reduce the risk of contamination and food borne illness. The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Findings include: On 12/30/25 at 10:52 AM, observed the Dietary Manager puree a grilled turkey [NAME] sandwich while wearing gloves. When finished with pureeing the sandwich, the Dietary Manager removed her gloves and then proceeded to wash out the dishes used to puree the sandwich in the sink, put the dirty dishes in the dishwasher and then continued to puree the next food items without washing her hands. On 12/30/25 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed the Dietary Manager wore gloves to get the room trays ready to be delivered to the unit. During the process, the Dietary Manager touched each grilled turkey [NAME] sandwich with her gloved hands, then served the potatoes and peas with a utensil, then with her gloved hands took a cookie out of the plastic container and put the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's had a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, with 2 recliners showing extensive wear. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include:On 12/29/25 at 12:40 p.m. observed Resident #50 in her room sitting in a recliner. The arms of the recliner had large areas of the top covering warn off. The area behind the head also warn off. On 12/29/25 at 1:30 p.m. the burgundy recliner in the common area (of the 300, 400 and 500 halls) showed the burgundy covering worn off at the the back of the head area. On 12/31/25 at 7:45 a.m. the Maintenance Staff (MS) brought another chair into Resident #50's room, and said another resident may be moving in. He stated the recliner already in the room would be a facility chair, and said it looked bad, and should be replaced. On 12/31/2025 at 9:16 AM the MS verified the burgundy chair in the common area belonged to the facility. The undated facility policy, Resident Environmental Quality, documented it was the policy of the facility to be designed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to complete and document appropriate assessments and interventions for the necessary care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well-being for 2 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #12 and #4). The facility failed to document a gastrointestinal assessment and notify the physician when indicated for Resident #12. The facility also failed to implement interventions for Resident #4 with new skin issues. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include: 1. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #12 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and transfers to the toilet. The MDS documented Resident #12 was frequently incontinent of bowel and constipation was present. The MDS included diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing and water humidifier for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #12) for respiratory services. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings Include: Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)(progressive lung condition) and congestive heart failure (heart inability to pump blood causing fluid build up). The MDS documented Resident #12 received oxygen while a resident within the last 14 days. A Physician order dated 11/7/25 directed Resident #12 to wear oxygen per nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation above 90% as needed related to COPD. The order directed no more than 3 liters of oxygen for diagnosis of COPD.The Care Plan with a target date of 2/25/26 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices in order to prevent and control the onset and spread of infection within the facility by not wearing the required personal protective equipment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for catheter care. The facility also failed to keep dirty linens off the floor. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #4's MDS included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of prostate gland), renal (kidney) disease and obstructive uropathy (blockage in urinary tract preventing normal urine flow). The MDS revealed Resident #4 had an indwelling catheter (thin tube used to drain urine). The Care Plan with a target date of 12/31/25 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility reported a census of 42. Findings include: A direct observation on 01/12/2025 at 10:23 AM of the kitchen revealed an open container of cottage cheese with a discard date of 01/11/2025. It also revealed an unmarked, undated meat product stored in the freezer in a single sheet of plastic cling wrap. The Dietary Manager identified the item as roast beef, and stated it had been prepared within a day or two of the observation. A direct observation on 01/14/2025 at 09:33 AM of the kitchen dining service Staff A, Cook, was observed wearing the same pair of disposable vinyl gloves while prepping three unique food items, touching different utensils, the walls, as well as other contaminated surfaces before returning to prepare ground meat for the lunch service. During the same observation, Staff A was witnessed coughing into the same pair of vinyl gloves without changing them. While preparing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to verify the resident's advanced directive choice for 1 (Resident #46) of 12 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The Clinical Census Sheet dated [DATE], documented Resident #46 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and Code Status, Advanced Directive of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Observation on [DATE] at 10:38 AM, resident's hard chart with sticker Full Code (initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event resident is not breathing and has no pulse) on the outside of the chart and the inside of the chart lacked an IPOST (Iowa Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment) (document that allows a person to communicate their preferences for key life-sustaining treatments). The resident's electronic health record, revealed an Order Summary Report, dated [DATE], with a physician's order dated [DATE] for DNR. Interview on [DATE] at 10:39 AM, Staff B, Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to followed a physician's order for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident # 1, dated 12/19/24, documented she scored 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of cerebral palsy, and documented received a scheduled pain medication regimen with frequent pain or hurting over the last 5 days. Interview on 1/14/25 at 10:22 AM, resident stated she is to receive a Lidocaine pain patch on her left shoulder every day and then removed at bedtime. The resident further stated the patch was not available today and there were also 2 weekends in December that the facility did not have the patch to apply to her. The resident stated the patch helps a lot with the shoulder pain. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Records documented the Lidocaine pain patch not available on the following dates in the past 3 months: a. 11/9, 11/10,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0948 — isolated
  Ensure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a person that assisted a resident to eat was a certified paid feeding assistant for 1 (Resident #36) of 15 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The MDS for Resident #36, dated 12/23/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview, indicated severe cognitive impairment for decision-making. Observation on 1/13/25 at 12:00 PM, in the dining room with the Assistant Director of Nursing present, the resident was assisted to eat by another resident's wife. Facility policy Assistance with Meals revised March 2022, documented facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating. Interview on 1/13/25 at 3:57 PM the Director of Nursing stated expectation for family/visitors to not assist non-family member residents to dine.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $436K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA