No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Falls Health Care Center

1728 West Eighth Street, Cedar Falls, IA 50613 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (319) 277-2437 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (319) 277-2437 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 20251 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1824 W 8th St · (319) 277-0992 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.6 mi
2302 W 1st St · (319) 277-5181 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1323 W 2nd St · (319) 240-8208 · Call to confirm hours
Park
515 College St · (319) 273-8636 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1302 W 11th St · (319) 266-5959

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.1%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%2.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.8%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.4%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.5%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control38.9%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table36.3%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.8%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%73.3%79.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
43.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.72 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines, Policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 2 residents who tested positive for influenza A (Residents #17 and #38). In addition, the facility failed to implement droplet precautions, sanitize the barrier used during a blood sugar check for 1 of 2 residents observed (Resident #23), and failed to adhere to infection control practices during medication administration when dirty gloves contacted oral medication for 3 of 7 resident observed (Residents #16, #19 and #34). On 1/2/26, the facility failed to follow infection control protocols after Resident #17 tested positive for influenza A. After Resident #17 tested positive for influenza A, the facility failed to initiate isolation or droplet precautions to prevent the spread of influenza A. On 1/6/26, Resident #38 (Resident #17's roommate) displayed signs and symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a restorative program available for all residents at the facility. The facility failed to implement a restorative plan for 2 of 2 residents that reported if they had an option to do therapy, they would (Residents #36 and #43). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS listed Resident #36 as dependent on staff (requires 2 staff to complete the task and the staff do all the work) for toileting, dressing, transfers and personal hygiene. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke, anxiety, depression, and hemiplegia (the loss of muscle function, causing an inability to move voluntarily to one entire side of the body, affecting the face, arm, and leg, caused by brain damage to the opposite side of the brain). Resident #36 Care Plan on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing on 3 of 4 days of the annual survey. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: An observation on 1/5/26 at 10:17 AM revealed the facility had nurse staff posting for 1/3/26 posted. An observation on 1/6/26 at 1:41 PM revealed the facility had nurse staff posting for 1/5/25 posted.An observation on 1/7/26 at 3:47 PM revealed the facility had nurse staff posting for 1/5/25 posted.In an interview on 1/8/26 at 11:24 AM the Administrator reported she expected the night nurse to complete the nurse staff posting for the next day and post it on their shift, then have the staff update as changes occurred. She repotted it's never been identified as an issue that it has not been updated before, and unsure why it was not completed this week. Review of Nurse Staffing Posting Information policy revised in unknown month, 2025 informed it is the policy to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to starting psychotropic medications that have black box warnings (the most serious safety warning the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses and requires the healthcare provider to have a comprehensive discussion with the resident about the risks, benefits, and alternatives for use) for 3 for 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. (Resident #36, #40, and #8). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. It informed he received antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant (3 types of psychotropic drug classes that are used to manage various mental health conditions by balancing chemical neurotransmitters in the brain, which are then released by nerve cells to transmit signals across tiny gaps to other neurons,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to accurately code 1 of 2 residents with a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (a federal assessment that is a requirement for Medicaid-certified nursing facilities to screen all applicants for serious mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or developmental disabilities to ensure they are placed in the most appropriate, least restrictive setting and receive needed services, preventing inappropriate institutionalization and promoting community-based care) (Resident #7) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #7 PASRR's dated 1/13/23 revealed she had a PASRR Level II outcome (a detailed evaluation confirmed an individual has a serious mental illness or intellectual disability related condition, that determined she needs specialized services, the result is not just a diagnosis but a decision about the necessary support, leading to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess 1 of 1 residents positive for influenza A (Resident #17). The facility identified a census of 43 residents.Findings include:Resident #17 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 6, indicating severe cognitive loss. The MDS listed diagnoses of altered mental state, acute respiratory (lung) failure and adult failure to thrive. The Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) Census documented Resident #17 resided in a room in the D hallway. A 1/2/26 Hospital After Visit Summary documented Resident #17 had a hospital emergency room (ER) visit for shortness of breath (SOB) with a diagnosis of influenza A and chronic obstructive pulmonary exacerbation (blockage in the lungs that makes it difficult to breathe). The After Visit Summary included to call the doctor or seek immediate medical care if they had any of the following:Trouble breathingFever with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, resident and Nurse Practitioner interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete pre and post dialysis (an external method to remove the wastes and toxins from the body with poor functioning kidneys) assessments (assessments involving checking the residents blood pressure, temperature, pulse, and weight; and inspection of the dialysis access site on the body) for 1 of 1 residents that received dialysis (Resident #40). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 12/9/25. The MDS identified a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The MDS documented he received dialysis treatment while at the facility. An interview on 1/7/26 at 9:40 AM the Social Worker at the local dialysis center reported Resident #40 received routine dialysis while living at the facility on 12/10/25, 12/12/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, staff, resident, and Nurse Practitioner interview, the facility failed to have set blood sugar parameters (a numerical range the blood sugar should remain in) in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #40). In addition, the facility failed to notify a resident's doctor after the completion of elevated blood sugar assessments to ask if additional medication or treatment is needed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin medication usage (Resident #40). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include:Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 12/9/25. The MDS identified a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The MDS documented he received dialysis treatment while at the facility. The MDS indicated Resident #40 received insulin medication during the lookback period.The Care Plan Problem revised 12/22/25 indicated Resident #40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, manufacturer's guide for use and staff interview, the facility failed to properly prime an insulin pen and prevent expired insulin from being administered for 1 of 1 residents observed (Resident #39). The facility identified a census of 43 residents.Findings include:During the Medication Task observation on [DATE] at 11:55 AM Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) reviewed Resident #39's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR). Resident #39's EMAR documented a physician order for Lantus Solostar Insulin Pen 100 Units/Milliliter (ML). Inject 10 units subcutaneously. Staff B, without placing a needle on the insulin pen, set the insulin pen, dated [DATE], to 2 units, hit the plunger and primed the pen with no insulin expressed from the pen. Staff B then set the insulin pen to ten units and placed the needle on the pen to give the insulin to Resident #39. Staff B failed to check the insulin pen expiration until after the Surveyor asked for the date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Program (QAPI) to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in repeated identified concerns during the current survey. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include:A review of the facility's 12/12/24 Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction showed citations for F760 ensuring residents are free of significant medication errors. The facility's Plan of Correction identified the following: Immediate education on correction administration per the manufacturer's guidelines for the staff involved.The facility identified all other residents using insulin pens to ensure staff were following correct administration.Education was provided on 12/18/24.The Director of Nursing (DON)/Designee performed audits daily x 5, weekly x 4, monthly x 2 with the results being forwarded to the QAPI committee. The Statement of Deficiencies also showed a citation for F880 Infection Control regarding staff touching medications with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician when the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 43. Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, other psychoactive (mind altering) substance use, unspecified with mood disorder, and psychophysiologic insomnia (loss of sleep linked to the excessive worry about sleep).Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2025 and October 2025 documented Gabapentin (pain medication also used as an antianxiety medication) ordered for three times a day omitted (not documented) from 9/18/25 through 10/7/25.Resident #1's Progress Notes lacked documentation of the physician being notified of the omission of Gabapentin.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medication as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 43. Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, other psychoactive substance use, unspecified with mood disorder, and psychophysiologic insomnia.Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2025 and October 2025 documented Gabapentin (pain medication also used as an antianxiety medication) ordered for three times a day omitted from evening dose 9/18/25 thru 10/7/25. On 10/21/25 at 12:35 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the pharmacy delivery records for Gabapentin since admission 0n 8/1/25. She reported she would look further into the discrepancy with the medication.Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to report within the required time frame an allegation of abuse to Iowa Department of Inspection and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility intake information reported to DIAL documented the facility reported Resident #1 had an allegation of missing money on 3/7/25 at 5:23 PM. The facility staff learned of the incident when Resident #1 reported it on 2/25/25. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 1:20 PM, the Social Service Designee reported Staff A, Certified Nurses' Aide (CNA), told her Resident #1 reported he had missing money on 2/25/25. The Social Services Designee reported it right away to the Director of Nursing (DON) during the morning meeting after they verified Resident #1 was missing $50. The Administrator instructed her to check Resident #1's room to make sure he didn't miss place it. The Social Services Designee reported back to the Administrator, they didn't find the money…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility medical record, family, volunteer, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to revise and implement interventions on the comprehensive Care Plan to include redirection for a resident with a known behavior of packing food into her mouth for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 39. Findings Include: Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of traumatic brain dysfunction (brain damage caused by an outside force), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body does not produce enough insulin). The MDS documented no swallowing disorders. The Care Plan Focus initiated 7/7/22 reflected Resident #2 had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to confusion and impaired balance. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to serve hot food at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for 1 of 1 test tray requested. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The facility provided a test tray on 12/10/24 at 12:06 PM. The food temperatures measured the following: a. The casserole temperature - 55 degrees Celsius (C) or 131 degrees F. b. The beans temperature - 47 degrees C or 116.6 degrees F. Staff C, Dietary, confirmed she took the temperatures in Celsius. She reported she didn't know what the expected temperature of the food should measure. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 1:01 PM, the Dietary Manager explained they should serve the hot food at a temperature of at least 154 degrees F. The facility policy titled Food Preparation and Service, last revised October 2017, directed the staff to maintain hot food temperatures above 135 degrees F.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all staff entering the kitchen had their hair contained in a hair net for 2 of 2 observations. The facility reported a census of 38 residents: Findings include: During an observation on 12/9/24 at 10:01 AM, Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), without wearing a hairnet, entered the kitchen, walked in front of the steam table to the coffee machine, filled a cup and exited the kitchen. During an observation on 12/10/14 at 11:18 AM, Staff B, CNA, entered the kitchen. She put a hair net on the top of her head, without containing all of her hair. The hairnet didn't contain the hair on the sides and back of her head. She walked around the steam table, got some ice out of the ice machine, opened a refrigerator, took out a pitcher of what appeared to be iced tea, set the pitcher on the prep table, had the cook cover the pitcher with plastic wrap, and exited the kitchen. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:58 AM, the Dietary Manager explained she expected all staff entering the kitchen to wear a hair net.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, manufacturer's instructions for use and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when administering insulin to a diabetic resident via insulin pen for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #8 and #32). The Facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. On 12/10/24 at 8:18 AM, observed Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), review Resident #8's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR). Resident #8's December 2024 EMAR listed the following physician orders: a. Tresiba (insulin) Flex Touch Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 Units (U)/Milliliter (ML). Inject 20 units subcutaneously one time a day related to type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with unspecified complications. b. Fiasp (Insulin) Pen Fill Subcutaneous Solution Cartridge 100 U/ML. Inject 15 unit subcutaneously three times a day related to type 2 DM with unspecified complications. At 8:19 AM Staff F dialed the dose selector button on the Fiasp insulin pen to 15 units and the Tresiba insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices while administering medication. Observations of the nursing staff revealed they touched medication with their bare hands during medication administration for 2 of 4 residents observed for oral medication pass. The facility identified a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/10/24 at 7:42 AM Staff E, Certified Medication Aide (CMA), failed to perform hand hygiene prior to setting up Resident #13 morning medications after she went to the kitchen to get them a supplement. Staff E unlocked the medication cart, opened the drawer and obtained Resident #13's medication cards placing them on top of the medication cart. Staff E held each medication card in her left hand and punched the pill out the back of the card into her right hand, then placed the pill into the medication cup. Staff E continued to utilize this technique for setting up the following medications for Resident #13 in addition to administration of stock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure door alarm checks and wander guard alarm checks were physically completed as documented to ensure the safety of facility residents including 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #3 & #7). The Facility identified a census of 35 residents. Finding include: 1. Resident #3 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 indicating a severe cognitive loss. The MDS documented Resident #3 as independent in ambulation and bed/chair transfers. The MDS listed diagnoses of stroke with aphasia and Parkinson's Disease. Resident #3 Elopement Risk Assessment completed 9/04/24 showed a score of 2 indicating a low risk of elopement. 2. Resident #7 MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed a BIMS score of 6 out 15 indicating severe cognitive loss. The MDS documented Resident #7 with a diagnosis of traumatic brain dysfunction, independent in ambulation/transfer, and wandered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interview on 7/15/24 the facility failed to make the required notifications for residents for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #5 and #6). The facility failed have an updated condition report list to accurately notify the family/resident representative of an acute transfer and hospital admission for Resident #6. In addition, the facility failed to notify the physician when the facility didn't have medications to give Resident #5 the night of her admission to the facility. The facility identified a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicated intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #6 as independent for bed mobility and partial to moderate assistance for transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of traumatic subdural hematoma (injury to the brain) and a seizure disorder. A progress note dated 7/15/24 at 10:32 AM written by Staff A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to following medication administration protocols for a new admission resident to the facility. The facility failed to provide medications as ordered on admission for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 6/27/24 from a short-term hospital. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare, hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness. and severe obesity. Resident #5's June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) included the following orders dated 6/27/24: a. Clonazepam 0.25 milligrams (MG) daily for anxiety at HS (hour of sleep). - The documentation indicated the facility held the 6/27/24 and 6/28/24 doses. b. Famotidine 20 MG twice a day (BID) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment due to leaks in the ceiling in the hallway entering the main dining room and in the main dining room. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: Observation 7/2/24 at 8:58 AM, revealed 5 garbage cans with turn sheets underneath them, 4 caution wet floor signs and water coming from the ceiling. The ceiling looked discolored with tears in the ceiling of the hallway entering the main dining room. Further observation revealed 3 garbage cans with turn sheets underneath them in a corner of the dining room with water in the garbage cans. This ceiling looked discolored with a tear. During an interview 7/2/24 at 9:06 AM, Staff A, Housekeeping Assistant, explained they saw water coming in from the ceiling in the hallway entering the main dining and inside the dining room, three times. Staff A further added they replaced the sheets under the garbage cans when they get too wet. During an interview 7/2/24 at 9:20 AM, Staff B, Certified Medication Assistant (CMA), reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding the administration of medications administered outside the scheduled time frames for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 4/19/24. The MDS identified and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed the resident had diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychotic disorder and chronic pain. Review of undated facility form titled, Medication Administration Times, identified the following administration times: a. AM: 6:30am 11:00am b. Lunch: 11:00am 2:00pm c. PM: 4:00pm 6:30pm d. Bedtime: 7:00pm 11:00pm The Medication Administration policy, revised 2/27/20, instructed to administer medications by following the principles of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide or offer a shower twice a week for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). In addition, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #3, #4, #6). The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected showers as very important to them. The MDS listed Resident #3 as occasionally incontinent. The MDS included diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident (CVA or stroke) and hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body). The Care Plan Focus initiated 4/3/24 indicated Resident #3 needed assistance with activities of daily living related to a history of CVA. The Goal listed to maintain his hygiene and appearance. Resident #3's Shower Sheets from 4/10/24 to 5/22/24 identified the staff didn't offer or provide him a shower from 4/13/24 to 4/20/24 and from 5/4/24 to 5/15/24. Resident #3's June 2024 Documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to assist 1 of 1 residents reviewed with requested discharge planning to an assisted level of care (Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #28 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. A Care Plan with a revision date of 1/26/23, documented that this resident was independent with bed mobility, personal hygiene/oral care (needs cueing in morning to wash face and brush teeth), dressing, eating, transfers, locomotion, and toilet use. The Care Plan stated this resident was an assist of 1 with bathing. On 2/19/24 at 1:52 p.m., Resident #28 stated that he wanted to go to an AL facility but they are taking so long. Resident #28 stated that the facility told him they have an assessment lined up. Resident #28 stated that it had been over 3 months ago and he still hadn't had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident or their representative of the policy for Bed Holds for 1 of 3 resident reviewed (Resident #3). Resident #3 went out to the hospital on 2 separate occasion and no notification of the Bed Hold policy was issued for Resident #3. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: A Census page for Resident #3, documented that this resident discharged to the hospital on 5/13/23 with a return date of 5/17/23 and discharged to the hospital again on 1/11/24 with a return date of 1/16/24. In an email dated 2/21/24 at 2:29 p.m., the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator responded that she was not able to find the Bed Hold notices for the above hospital discharges for Resident #3.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to do a PASARR (pre-admission screening and resident review) Level 2 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #19). The facility failed to do a PASARR Level 2 when a mental health diagnosis was added for Resident #19. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: A Diagnoses Page for Resident #19 documented a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was added on 7/21/20. Resident #1 had PASARR Level 1 done on 1/10/22 and on 12/16/22. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was not listed as a diagnosis on these PASARR Level 1 assessments and no PASARR 2 was done. On 2/21/24 at 2:23 PM, the Social Services Designee stated she did not do a Level 2 for this resident as his Level 1 documented a Level 2 was not needed. She acknowledged a change in status PASARR should have been done when the PTSD diagnosis was added. She asked when the diagnosis was added. When told it was added on 7/21/20 per the electronic health record, she stated she was not in the SSD position at that time.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for reevaluation when 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #8) demonstrated increased behavioral, psychiatric, or mood-related symptoms and the facility received an order to send to the emergency room (ER) for Psychiatric evaluation and treatment. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #8 dated 11/6/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented behaviors over the past week on 1-3 days she had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds). The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident, staff, and Provider interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and intervention to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #16 dated 12/15/2023, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairments. The MDS documented he was dependent on staff for using the bathroom, shower/bathing, dressing, and rolling in bed. The MDS also instructed the facility did not attempt due to his medical condition or safety concerns him moving from a lying position to a sitting, standing, and walking. The MDS informed he is not on a urinary toileting program and is always incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS documented diagnoses of renal failure, hip fracture, depression, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #16 Progress Note dated 1/9/24 at 4:03 AM documented Resident #16 informed staff that when he urinates he had pain that feels like broken glass…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, staff, and Provider interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain records and complete routine assessments for 2 of 3 residents documented with pressure ulcers (Resident #17 and #24). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #17, dated 1/31/2024 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS instructed she was dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. The MDS documented diagnoses of anemia, neurogenic bladder, seizure disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. The MDS documented she had one (1) Stage II (2) pressure ulcer. The MDS for Resident #17, dated 11/29/23 documented she had no pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident #17 Assessments in the facilities Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented inconsistent records of skin assessments for the following dates: a. 11/2/23 - Right Buttock, Unstageable Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain records for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #35) on education and offering of Pneumococcal and Influenza vaccination. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #35 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating he had severely impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #35 Immunizations in the facilities Electronic Health Record on 2/21/2024 revealed he had not had the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccine. Record review of Resident #35 Progress Notes on 2/22/24 lacked documentation he or his representative was provided with education and requested/refused Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/21/24 at 1:24 PM revealed the facilities Social Worker obtains consents for residents on immunizations. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 2:21 PM with the facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain records for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #35) on education and offering of COVID-19 vaccination. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #35 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating he had severely impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #35 Immunizations in the facilities Electronic Health Record on 2/21/2024 revealed he had not had the COVID-19 immunizations. Record review of Resident #35 Progress Notes on 2/22/24 lacked documentation he or his representative was provided with education and requested/refused COVID-19 immunizations. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/21/24 at 1:24 PM revealed the facilities Social Worker obtains consents for residents on immunizations. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 2:21 PM with the facilities Social Worker revealed she does not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, family and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). On 8/14/23 Resident #3 had a witnessed fall, was lowered to the floor by staff. Facility staff failed to assess the resident prior to assisting to stand, failed to report the fall to the charge nurse, and failed to provide ongoing monitoring and assessment following the fall. On 8/18/23 the resident was noted to have swelling, and yellow-green bruising to the left knee, required transfer and admission to the local hospital for a fractured left femur. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 5/29/23 for Resident #3 identified moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making. The MDS further revealed the resident required the limited assistance of one staff for transfers, and diagnosis that included Trisomy 18, aphasia (trouble speaking and understanding others), pain in the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-05 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DOLE, ISAACIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
BIRCHWOOD HEALTHCARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
CAMPBELL STREET IA 10 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
HOLDCO, IA, 10, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2025
CUTLER, DARRONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
HAMBLY, CINDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
SATTERFIELD, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
SIGLER, SHERIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
ACD CONSOLIDATED LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BEAR CREEK SRAF GP HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BEAR CREEK STRATEGIC REAL ASSETS FUND LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
DEFRANCO INVESTMENT CO LTDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
IAGA SNF CEDAR FALLS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
IAGA SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
IAGA SNF PORTFOLIO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
NAP HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$192K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 2%Other / private 17%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $192K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,959per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165197. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next