No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency Care Center

815 High Road, Norwalk, IA 50211 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (515) 981-4269 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation$78,497 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $78,497 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
801 Colonial Cir · (515) 285-3200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1128 Sunset Dr · (515) 981-0139 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Fareway0.5 mi
2200 Sunset Dr · (515) 981-4420 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1104 Sunset Dr · (515) 981-9206 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.9%17.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.0%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.9%20.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.4%19.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.2%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%20.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.1%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.041.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.912.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 40.7–70.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.3–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified63.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.7%CMS range 6.7–17.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 67.2 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to supervise residents at risk for elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #9). This failure resulted in the resident eloping from the facility, his whereabouts unknown for approximately an hour and 30 minutes and sustaining fractures of five ribs, therefore causing an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as ofMay 8, 2025, on August 18, 2025 at 1:15 PM. The Facility Staff removed theImmediate Jeopardy on August 20, 2025 through the following actions: Resident assessed and sent to the hospital 100% Headcount of all Residents on 6/4/2025 100% Elopement Risk assessment review completed by DON for accuracy and current on 6/5/2025. The three residents verified at risk for elopement, and wearing wanderguard devices, had all care plan interventions reviewed and confirmed in place for supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #18). Resident #18 reported she had laid in urine for a delayed period of time without Staff X, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), cleaning her up after asking this CNA to clean her up, causing her pain. This resident reported that she felt fearful that Staff X was going to hit her (Resident 18) and did not want Staff X to return to her room. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include:A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented that Resident #18's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and cardiorespiratory conditions. A Brief Interview for Mental Status revealed a score of 13 out of 15, which revealed her cognition was intact. This resident was always incontinent of urine and bowel. She required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left and right in bed and to sit up and lie down in bed. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess and provide pain management to adequately control residents pain for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 68) reviewed for pain management. This failure put the resident at risk of uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #68 documented a [DATE] admission date to the facility from an acute hospital stay. Her diagnoses included dementia, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident was cognitively severely impaired. The MDS documented the resident's health conditions included pain management with scheduled pain medications and that the resident had not received PRN (as needed) pain medications or non-medication interventions for pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Reports, staff interviews, facility assessment review, and facility record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs for 12 of 26 weekend days during the months of October, November, and December 2025. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the facility for October 1 through December 31, 2025 revealed the facility had triggered the metric for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing which required follow-up during the survey process. The PBJ Nurse Staffing and Non-Nurse Staffing datasets provided information submitted by the facility on a quarterly basis. CMS had long identified staffing as one of the vital components of a nursing home's ability to provide quality care. In an interview on 5/5/26 at 1:59 p.m. Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she had worked at the facility since July 2024. She stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess if a resident was appropriate to self-administer medications for one of one residents review for self-medication administration. Resident#54 was left unsupervised with medications. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #54 revealed the diagnoses of a heart dysrhythmia, high blood pressure, arthritis, depression and long-term gall bladder inflammation. The MDS identified that Resident #54 was taking antidepressant medication. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 suggested Resident #54 was cognitively intact. The Care Plan for Resident #54 revealed the risk for pain, a potential for altered mood and was elected for Hospice care due to his terminal condition. The Hospice care plan directed licensed nursing staff to provide medications as ordered. During an observation on 5/4/26 at 1:05 pm, Resident #54 was laying in bed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and resident council meeting, the facility nursing staff failed to notify the physician of a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents were reviewed (Resident #11). During a resident council meeting, Resident #11 reported having chest pain during the night to Staff J, Activities Director. Staff J filled out a grievance form and gave it to the Director of Nursing (DON) who failed to follow up and report the episode to the physician. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #11 revealed the diagnoses of Parkinson's and was independent for activities of daily living. Resident #11 denied pain during the assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 suggested an intact cognition.The Care Plan directed staff to monitor and document pain for probable cause of each pain episode and notify the physician if pain was a significant change from past experiences.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to do the assessment for an initial Brief Interview of Mental Status (MDS), for Resident #34. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include:A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 3/17/26 at 11:39 a.m., documented that Resident #34 was not assessed. On 5/7/26 at 12:41 p.m., the Administrator stated that the BIMS was not done with Resident #34's initial MDS. They had a PRN (as needed) traveling MDS person who worked on the MDS remotely. There was a miscommunication and it did not get conveyed to social services or anyone on the team in the facility that an MDS assessment needed to be done. A PRN BIMS was done today. A BIMS (PRN) dated 5/7/26 at 11:30 p.m., documented a score of 8 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition for Resident #34. A MDS 3.0 Completion policy dated 2025, directed the following:Policy:Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. Definitions: OBRA Assessment refers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise one of one resident's care plan (Resident #68) following a significant change in the resident's pain status, placing the resident at risk for uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #68 documented a [DATE] admission date to the facility from an acute hospital stay. Her diagnoses included dementia, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident was cognitively severely impaired. The MDS documented the resident's health conditions included pain management with scheduled pain medications and that the resident had not received PRN (as needed) pain medications or non-medication interventions for pain. Resident #3's Pain Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #34). The facility failed to trim resident's toenails which had grown long and were snagging on his socks. The facility reported a census of 58. Findings include:The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #34 (R34) required assistance from staff for the following; toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, shower/bathing, and putting on/taking off footwear. The MDS documented the R34's admission date as March 9, 2026. A care plan revised on 3/13/26, directed nursing staff that Resident #34 had a self-care deficit focus area evidenced by requiring assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living).This resident was a 1 person assist. Staff were to encourage bathing 2x weekly, inspect skin during showers and alert charge nurse to any skin issues. Nursing staff were to check nail length and trim/clean on bath days and as necessary. On 5/5/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an assessment and timely intervention for the necessary care and services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #11 and Resident #45). Resident #11 reported having chest pain over night that lasted 15 minutes. The licensed nursing staff failed to provide an assessment after receiving the information. Resident #45 had a wound requiring a wound vac (medical device that uses negative pressure to promote healing in wounds). The licensed staff failed to maintain and provide interventions to ensure proper functioning of the wound vac. The wound vac was missing several changes and was not properly secured and functioning during wound clinic visits. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #11 revealed the diagnoses of Parkinson's and was independent for activities of daily living. Resident #11 denied pain during the assessment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility's licensed nursing staff failed to appropriately set and maintain oxygen devices for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen administration (Resident #20). The nursing staff reported adjusting the oxygen setting who were not licensed staff. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #20 revealed the diagnoses of asthma with dependence on oxygen delivery. The Care Plan for Resident #20 identified oxygen to be delivered at 2 Liters without further direction for nursing staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and or Registered Nurse (RN)). The Physician Orders for Resident #20 revealed an order for 2 liters of oxygen and the direction for the nursing staff to change oxygen tubing every Wednesday. During an observation on 5/04/2026 at 2:33 pm, Resident #20 was in her bed with oxygen tubing dated 4/15/26 on tape that went into Resident #20's nose by a nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for peritoneal dialysis, to provide initial and ongoing assessment and oversight of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and to provide consistent care and documentation per professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed that received peritoneal dialysis in the facility (Resident #69). Resident #69 received peritoneal dialysis in the facility which was connected and disconnected by her sons. The nurses did not provide these interventions. The facility was unable to produce provider's orders for the dialysis, documentation of assessments for this dialysis, documentation of the connecting and disconnecting of the peritoneal dialysis, and clarification for who was to turn on and shut off the dialysis. The staff at the facility allowed this to go on without seeking clarification. This resident required hospitalization related to avulsion of her external peritoneal dialysis tubing (a medical emergency when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, resident representative interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide medically-related Social Services in assisting and obtaining Medicaid applications and Power of Attorney documents for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #57) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include:Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57's admission to the facility on 2/6/26 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment completed on 2/23/26 resulting in a score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #57's diagnoses included urinary tract infection, diabetes, COPD, respiratory failure, anxiety, depression, and requiring substantial/maximal assistance with the use of a wheelchair. Review of Resident #57's Care Plan initiated 2/13/26 documented impaired cognitive function and thought processes. The Care Plan documented that the resident used a walker in the bedroom with assist of one staff member, and used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility staff failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place for residents with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (Resident #24), failure of staff to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents on EBP (Resident #8), and failure to follow proper infection control practices to prevent the transmission of infection with blood sugar monitoring. The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings include:1. Review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 BIMS of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment with diagnoses of Multidrug-Resistant Organism ((MDRO) bacteria that have become resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics) and Urinary Tract Infection, and incontinent of bowel and bladder with need for substantial/maximal assistance with ambulation and use of walker or wheelchair. Review of Resident #24's Care Plan initiated 1/23/26 documented incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include:According to the Discharge-Return Not Anticipated MDS assessment tool with reference date of 11/24/2025 documented Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home/community on 11/24/2025.The Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 11/24/2025 documented Resident #2 and responsible party choose long-term placement. Review of Resident #2's progress notes from 11/12/2025-12/1/2025 revealed no documentation of her being discharged from the facility. On 12/30/2025 at 11:45 AM Resident #2 was observed to be sitting in the dining room with her peers. On 12/30/2025 at 11:57 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #2 was in the building and not discharged . While reviewing the MDS that was completed on 11/24/2025 she acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents' (Resident #1) care plan was updated to include interventions to offload her heals while in bed. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include:According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 11/29/2025 Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 had one pressure ulcer present upon admission/entry. She had a pressure reducing device for her bed and chair, utilized nutrition or hydration interventions to manage skin problems and received pressure ulcer care. Record review revealed wound care orders from a local hospital dated 11/21/2025. One order included to float Resident #1's heels with heel protectors at all times. The Care Plan Focus area with a revision date of 12/11/2025 documented she has the potential for impaired skin integrity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 4 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #6, #7, #9 and #12). The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of medically complex conditions, non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS documented a wander/elopement alarm was not used. The Care Plan for Resident #6, with an initiation date of 6/5/23, included a focus area: the resident is having adjustment issues to admission. An intervention for this focus area included Wander guard in place to the left lower leg. Functioning will be checked QS (twice daily). This was initiated on 8/13/24. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Elopement Risk Evaluation for Resident #6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet the residents' needs safely and timely. The facility reported a census of 68. Findings include: During an observation 8/5/25 at 9:00 AM in the back hallways (Ambassador halls), observed one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in the 5 hallway, one CNA in the 6 hallway and one CNA giving residents showers in the 5 and 6 hallway. A CNA was not observed in the 4 hallway. During an interview 8/5/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff F, CNA, stated to be fully staffed in Ambassador halls (halls 4, 5 and 6) they should have 2 CNA's on hall 5, two CNA's on hall 6 and then they split hall 4 with a floater CNA, they need 5 to 6 CNA's to be fully staffed on Ambassador halls. Staff F stated the back hallways are not normally staffed fully as they get more call ins back there, it is a more stressful area to work as residents have more care needs and there are more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed the resident was on high risk drug classes to include insulin and had received insulin injections 5 days of the 7 day look back period. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) admission papers for Resident #12 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. The admission medication list for the resident included the medications Empagliflozin (used to manage type 2 diabetes) 10 mg tablet one time each day and Metformin (used to treat type 2 diabetes) 500 mg tablet two tablets two times a day with meals. Review of the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff completed an accurate and timely resident assessment as necessary for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses to include medically complex conditions, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disorder, non-Alzherimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. The Care Plan for Resident #7, with an initiation date of 3/21/25, included a focus area: potential for elopement risk/wanderer risk. Interventions included: assess for elopement/wander risk and wander alert, left ankle device. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Elopement Risk Evaluation for Resident #7 completed on 3/20/25 revealed the resident at risk for elopement. Review of the EHR for Resident #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 8/5/25 at 9:40 AM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff G, CNA, performed a mechanical lift transfer for Resident #4. After the transfer was completed, Staff F moved the mechanical lift equipment into the hallway without cleaning or sanitizing the equipment and placed it in the hallway. The mechanical lift did not have a sanitizing agent in the basket attached to the lift. During an interview 8/5/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff F, CNA, stated during training, no one trained her on cleaning the equipment after each transfer. Staff F stated there are no cleaning/sanitizing wipes on the mechanical lift in this hallway. Staff F stated even if a resident is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) or Transmission Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper food equipment handling practices during meal service one of one meal service observed. The facility reported a census of 76. Finding include: During a lunch service observation on 4/13/24 at 11:45 AM,Staff H, Dietary, was seen transferring resident glasses to and from their table to the drink cart with fingers inside the glasses (empty glasses) or by the rim (full glasses) for a total of six occurrences. Staff H also observed carrying drinks back to resident tables with glasses held up against their apron for a total of 3 occurrences. During an interview on 4/16/25 at 9:50 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) voiced dietary staff should be carrying drinks to and from resident tables one at a time. The CDM also states staff should be carrying cups/glasses by the bottom and not by the rim. The policy Handling Dinnerware, Utensils, Tableware, and Smallware, with a revised date of 3/20/24, states glassware and cups should be held by their handles, and glassware should be held by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to update and revise resident Care Plans for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for personalized Care Plans (Residents #2 and #25). The facility reported a census of 76. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 12, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the MDS include benign prostatic hyperplasia, diabetes, neurogenic bladder, non-Alzheimer's dementia, schizophrenia, seizure disorder/epilepsy, and stroke. Resident #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS further documented Resident #2 was independent with transfers and required staff supervision/touching assistance for ambulation (without assistive devices). The Care Plan, with a targeted completion date of [DATE], noted Resident #2 with a suprapubic urinary catheter and use of a leg urinary drainage bag. Interventions on the Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, electronic heath record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #43). The facility reported a census of 76. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #43 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the MDS include diabetes, heart failure, and respiratory failure. The MDS further indicated Resident #43 receiving continuous oxygen therapy and experiences shortness of breath with exertion and when laying flat. The following observations on Resident #43 revealed the following: a. On 4/15/25 at 7:45 AM, while sitting in the dining room, the oxygen setting was at 2 liters (L) b. On 4/15/25 at 9:05 AM, while laying in bed, the oxygen setting was at 2 L c. On 4/15/25 at 3:45 PM, while sitting up in a wheelchair after staff assisted with personal cares, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Medication errors were observed for Resident #15 & Resident #61. A total of 28 ordered medications were reviewed with two errors, an error rate of 7%. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: 1. On 4/14/25 at 8:54 am, the observation of medication pass began. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared a total of 17 medications for Resident #15. Among the medications observed, Staff B prepared one tablet of Folic Acid, 400 micrograms (mcg). Staff A administered the medications to the resident at 9:05 am. 2. Staff A next prepared medications for Resident #61. He was witnessed preparing and administering nine medications for Resident #61. Staff A administered the medications to the resident at 9:21 am. When reconciling the observed medication pass against the orders for Resident #15, it was noted the Resident's order for Folic Acid was for 1 milligram (mg) rather than the 400 mcg the resident received. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, bathing documentation, interviews, and facility policy the facility failed to provide residents at least two showers or bed baths per week for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, #5, and #6). Documentation determined residents went as long as 10 days without a shower. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 8/26/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses including neurogenic bladder (bladder control issues due to damage to the brain, spinal cord, or nerves), septicemia (bacteria in the blood causing systemic infection), and quadriplegia. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for cares. The Care Plan for Resident #1 initiated 8/22/24 indicated Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficits due to quadriplegia and tracheostomy. Interventions included offering bathing/showering twice weekly and as necessary, and to provide a sponge bath when a full bath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) (state survey agency) within 24 hours of the allegation for 1 of 1 incident reviewed (Resident#1). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings Include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident#1 documented a score of 12 out of 15 for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated moderately impaired cognitive skills. The MDS documented that the resident had no behaviors, and diagnoses including high blood pressure, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and anxiety. Progress Note written on 11/20/24 at 3:30 PM documented Resident #1 had concerns about Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), being rough with him while positioning the resident and he requested she not work with him in the future. Progress Note written on 11/20/24 at 3:40 PM documented Resident #1 explained to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide routine perineal cares of incontinent residents for 1 of 4 residents observed for cares (Res #2). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) report dated 11/12/24 documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS reported the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and toilet transfers. The Medical Diagnosis list initiated 10/22/24 documented diagnoses including: malignant neoplasm of colon (cancer), need for assistance with personal cares, and difficulty walking. The Care Plan dated 10/22/24 for Resident #2 instructed staff to use an EZ stand with assist of 2 staff for toileting, and documented a check and change audit was initiated 10/28/2024 due to the resident and family denying cares were being provided. It further noted the resident had bowel incontinence and instructed staff to observe the pattern of incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility reported a census of 73. Findings include: A direct observation on 06/24/24 at 8:09 AM of the facility refrigerators revealed 1 bag of broccoli stored in a clear unlabeled bag. 1 Bag of croissants stored in a clear, unlabeled bag. 1 Bag of oriental vegetable blend stored in a blue unlabeled bag. 3 bags of cake stored in a clear unlabeled bag. A direct observation on 06/24/24 at 8:17 AM of the facility freezers revealed one freezer contained chunks of what was later identified to be potato frozen to the bottom of the freezer unit. They were not contained and appeared significantly oxidized. An interview on 06/26/24 at 1:18 PM with Staff A, Dietary cook, she stated she had been made aware of the improperly stored food. She noted it should have been labeled before it was placed in storage. She stated that policy dictates improperly stored food should be disposed of immediately after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, guidance from The Cleveland Clinic, and staff interviews, the facility failed to draw and monitor laboratory values for one of three residents reviewed during medication administration, (Resident #81 in Stage III kidney failure who was receiving medications which had the potential to affect kidney function). Findings include: The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated December 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 documented Resident #81 had diagnoses including Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3, and essential hypertension. The MAR documented the resident to be receiving Cozaar, 100 milligram (mg), an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) medication used to treat high blood pressure, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The MAR reflected the resident was also receiving 20 milliequivalents (MEQ) of Potassium daily and 80 mg of furosemide (also known as Lasix, a diuretic) twice daily. An article from The Cleveland Clinic, Titled Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, review date 6/17/22 cited ARB medications are used for high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and drug manufacturer's administration instructions, the facility failed to administer medications at an error rate of under 5%. The survey team observed 2 errors out of the 35 medications administered. The medication error rate was 5.7%. Findings include: During observation on 6/27/24, beginning at 7:13 am, Staff B, Licenses Practical Nurse (LPN) checked the blood glucose level of Resident #75. After obtaining her blood glucose, she prepared to administer 4 units of Lispro insulin. Staff B, LPN obtained the insulin pen from her cart, turned the dose indicator to 2 units of insulin, and stated she was priming the pen. She then connected a needle to the pen, turned the dose indicator to 4 units, and used appropriate hand hygiene and gloves administered the insulin to Resident #75. The document from the manufacturer's website titled Instructions for Use, Insulin Lispro KwikPen documented pen use as follows; Priming your pen: -Priming your Pen means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff responded and answered residents' call lights within 15 minutes, and met residents needs in a timely manner for two of two nursing units observed. The facility staff also failed to provide adequate supervision of residents during dining for 3 of 3 meal observations. The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: Observations revealed the following: 1. On 11/1/23 at 12:40 PM, Hall 5 had three call lights on. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) turned the last call light off at 12:59 PM. 2. On 11/1/23 at 12:50 PM, eight residents sat in the middle dining room with no staff present in the dining room. A female resident asked for someone to hand her some water. Resident # 6 sat in a wheelchair by the dining room table crying out I can't get this thing (wheelchair) to go, can you move it for me? At 12:56 PM, a male employee walked through the dining room and asked Resident #6 what she needed, then told the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves when contaminated or before touched other objects and utilized infection control practices to protect against cross contamination and potential spread of infection. The facility staff also failed to complete proper hand hygiene in-between dirty to clean tasks for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for incontinence cares and dressing changes (Resident #1, #6, and #7). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, second or third degree burns, and a history of COVID-19. The resident required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and toileting, and had incontinence. The Care Plan revised 7/28/23 revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity and a risk for developing pressure ulcers due to immobility and incontinence. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to assess and provide interventions for a resident who developed a skin sore for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #3), and failed to complete treatments as ordered for one of three residents reviewed (Resident # 1). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses of heart failure, renal insufficiency, and long-term use of anticoagulants. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident had no skin issues. The Care Plan initiated on 10/18/23 revealed the resident had a potential for impaired skin integrity. The care plan revised on 11/1/23 revealed the resident had an abrasion to the back of her left leg and lambs wool wrapped over the bottom part of the recliner. The Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide complete and proper incontinence care to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and infection for 3 of 3 residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #1, #6, and #7). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had diagnoses of diabetes, right above the knee amputation, cancer, and hemiplegia. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility, and total dependence on two for transfers and toileting. The MDS indicated the resident had incontinence. The Care Plan revised 8/7/23 revealed the resident had bladder incontinence and a risk for impaired skin integrity as evidenced by pressure injury and incontinence. The care plan directed staff to provide assistance of one, check and change the resident, and cleanse the peri-area after each incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to verify and track resident medications, to ensure medications administered as ordered, and ensure measures in place to prevent inadvertent duplication of medication. The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol/lipids in the blood), and diabetes. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating cognition intact. The Care Plan initiated 5/1/23 revealed the resident had HTN, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, CHF, and diabetes. The care plan directed staff to give medications as ordered. The Medication Administration Record revealed hydralazine 25 mg by mouth three times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident is treated with dignity and respect. (Resident #7) The facility reported census was 77. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 7/12/23, Resident #7 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. The MDS documented the resident required total dependence with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS documented diagnoses to include non-Alzheimer's dementia. According to Resident #7's plan of care dated 10/13/22 she has an ADL (activities of daily living) self care performance deficit with interventions which include required 2 assistance with toilet use and one assistance with personal hygiene needs. On 10/11/23 at 11:40 am Staff J stated this morning while she received report from the overnight aide (Staff M), she was told Resident #7 was incontinent and her gown and pad was wet. Staff M stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are provided incontinence care for 1 of 4 residents dependent on staff (Residents #7). The facility reported a census of 77. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 7/12/23, Resident #7 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. The MDS documented the resident required total dependence with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS documented diagnoses to include non-Alzheimer's dementia. According to Resident #7's plan of care dated 10/13/22 she has an ADL (activities of daily living) self care performance deficit with interventions which include required 2 assistance with toilet use and one assistance with personal hygiene needs. On 10/11/23 at 11:00 am Staff J stated this morning while she received report from the overnight aide (Staff M) she was told Resident #7 was incontinent and her gown and pad was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a prompt response to the resident's use of the nurse call system for 2 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #7). The facility reported census was 77. Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 9/16/23, Resident #4 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. The MDS documented the resident required extensive assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and is always incontinent of bowel and has a catheter. The MDS documented diagnoses to include cerebrovascular accident (stroke), renal and respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus and cancer. Resident #4's plan of care dated 8/15/23 included use of an EZ stand lift with transfers, resident to get up one time daily into recliner or wheelchair and staff assistance with repositioning. During an observation on 10/10/23 at 7:40 a.m. observed Resident #4 in bed, lying supine with her TV on. Resident #4 remained in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility's controlled substance accountability document review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility staff failed to have measures in place to ensure accurate documentation and tracking of controlled substance medications to prevent possible drug diversion for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2 and #9) and had controlled substance medications ordered. Schedule II-V controlled medications have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), anxiety disorder, and a history of COVID-19. The MDS revealed the resident took opioid medication seven of seven days and had no pain during the look-back period. The Care Plan revised on 4/18/23 revealed the resident had pain related to osteoarthritis, polyneuropathy, muscle spasms, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$78,497 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $78,497 — penalty dated 2025-08-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOLDCO, IA 5, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2026
BIRCHWOOD HEALTHCARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/03/2025
DOLE, ISAACIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
GRUNEWALD, DALEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
HALL, CARLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
ROBBINS, ROBINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
SATTERFIELD, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
CYCLONE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025
NORWALK PROPERTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$583K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 6%Other / private 42%

This home reported $583K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$254per resident / day
operating cost
$7,718per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165399. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next