Iowa City Rehab & Health Care
3661 Rochester Avenue, Iowa City, IA 52245 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (319) 351-7460 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.4% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.4% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.6% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.3% | 16.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.1% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.1% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.4% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.9% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.8% | 2.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 43.5% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 20.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 13.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 2.08 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 44.2 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications were provided with education regarding the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #43). Additionally, the facility failed to offer alternative treatment options prior to the administration of the medications. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident #4 dated 2/12/26 documented diagnoses that included: Non Alzheimer's dementia, depression and schizophrenia. The MDS recorded an admission date to the facility of 2/22/22. The MDS recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #4 for August 2025 reflected the resident had an order for Sertraline, an antidepressant medication, start date 8/29/25 at 25 mg (milligram) for seven days, increasing to 50 mg daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in facility dining room [ROOM NUMBER] of 2 dining observations, ensure furniture (chairs) in good condition in 1 of 2 entrance areas, and failed to ensure a clean environment in a resident's room (Resident #43). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: 1.On 5/05/2026 9:18 AM, observed chairs in the main entrance areas. Noted two wooden dining arm chairs with brown vinyl back of chair and chair seat. The dining room chairs showed significant signs of wear and tear. The varnish was worn, indicating that the finish had faded. Additionally, the arms were loose. Two arm chairs were also in this area, one was light green and the other was brown. Visible peeling and cracking of the upholstery noted on the seat, arms and backrest of the chairs. 2.On 5/05/25 at 1:00 PM, observation in the North dining room (DR) revealed five dining chairs. Five of Five dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement(QAPI) meeting documentation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out Quality Assessment Assurance (QAA) activities to obtain feedback, use data, and take action to conduct structured, systematic investigations and analysis of underlying causes or contributing factors of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impacted quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS) 2567, dated 12/15/25 listed, in part, the following concerns:F584 and F688The current survey, conducted 5/4/26 to 5/7/26, also identified the above concerns.On 5/7/26 at 2:28 p.m., the Administrator, stated the facility had no documentation related to QA activities targeted at restorative services and staffing. The facility QAPI and QAA Plan, revised 1/2/25, stated the facility would gather QAPI data from sources such as survey findings. The facility carried out systematic action and analysis in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting documentation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out Quality Assessment Assurance (QA), the facility failed to carry out quarterly QA meetings to identify issues with respect to QAA activities.Findings included: Review of QAPI Meeting Attendance Logs from the period of the last survey on 5/8/25 to the current survey on 5/4/26 revealed the facility lacked documentation of a QAPI meeting from 6/26/25 to 12/31/25. The facility QAPI and QAA Plan, revised 1/2/25, stated the facility would establish Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) and staff would review them no less often than quarterly.On 5/7/26 at 1:42 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility conducted QA monthly meetings but it was clear some months (in the last year) were missed.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to interviews, observations clinical record review and policy review, the facility failed to be honor resident request, that those that entered the room wear a mask to prevent further respiratory complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and respiratory failure. The Brief Interview for Mental Status scored 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The Care Plan revised on 3/18/26 for Resident #5 documented, potential for infection related to history of pneumonia and influenza. Interventions included that Resident #5 prefers to have staff wear a mask, please ask her before entering room. On 5/4/26 at 10:20 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) Staff B observed leaving Resident #5 room without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct a criminal background check prior to hire for 1 of 2 newly hired employees. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings included:The facility undated New Hire List and Roster listed a hire date for Staff J Certified Medication Aide as 8/14/25.Staff J's personnel file lacked documentation of a criminal background check completed upon hire. On 5/7/26 at 9:20 a.m, Staff H Interim Administrator stated that he had no other employee file documentation. He stated he was aware there were concerns with the files.On 5/7/26 at 11:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing(DON) stated criminal background checks should be done before hire.The Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, and Reporting Policy, dated 3/18/26, stated the facility would carry out criminal record checks on all prospective employees .
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold information for 2 of 2 residents admitted to the hospital(Residents #8 and #49) and failed to notify the ombudsman of hospitalizations for 1 of 2 residents admitted to the hospital(Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/23/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #8 which included end stage renal(kidney) disease, blindness, and abnormalities of breathing. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 12/26/25 General Progress Note stated the resident transferred to the Emergency Room. A 1/6/26 General Progress Note stated the resident returned from the hospital. A 1/9/26 General Progress Note stated the resident transferred to the Emergency Room. A 1/13/26 General Progress Note stated the resident returned to the facility. The facility lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and transmit a Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment following a significant change within federal guidelines for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for Hospice Admission. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings include:The Census Line portion of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #6 documented the resident enrolled in hospice care on 4/14/26. The MDS section of the resident's EHR documented a Significant Change MDS for Resident #6 as in process (incomplete), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/6/26. On 5/6/26 at 2:26 pm, the MDS Coordinator stated nobody had informed her Resident #6 had enrolled in hospice, so therefore, she had not set up or completed a Significant Change assessment. She stated the facility needed better communication and other staff were supposed to notify her. She added she regularly checked the census line of facility residents but if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living received adequate bathing assistance (Resident #11 and Resident #27). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/17/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #11 which included hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), stroke (a condition in which blood flow to part of the brain was interrupted), and bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by severe mood swings). The MDS stated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 5/4/26 at 10:55 a.m., Resident #11 stated staff did not assist her regularly with showers. She stated a week had elapsed between showers and this made her feel dirty and stinkin'. She stated staff was stretched too thin to complete the showers. On 5/5/26, the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a restorative program in order to maintain mobility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for restorative services (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings included:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/17/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #11 which included hemiplegia(one-sided paralysis), stroke (a condition in which blood flow to part of the brain was interrupted), and bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by severe mood swings). The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 5/4/26 at 1:44 p.m., Resident #11 stated she had a decline every time she finished with therapy services. She stated she walked with Physical Therapy (PT) but after she finished, staff did not walk with her. She could not recall when she walked last.Care Plan entries, revised 6/20/25, stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a dialysis (a treatment which filters waste and fluid from the blood when the kidneys failed) access site (a surgically created location allowing blood removal and return for cleansing) on non-dialysis days for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis care (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/23/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #8 which included end stage renal (kidney) disease, blindness, and abnormalities of breathing. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 1/25/25 Care Plan entry directed staff to complete a dialysis flow sheet daily to observe for access site complications.The April and May 2026 Medication Administration Records (MARs) directed staff to assess the resident's dialysis access site on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays(dialysis days) to check for signs and symptoms of infection or bleeding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to verify Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) certification validity prior to hire for 1 of 1 newly hired CMAs. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings included:1. The facility undated New Hire List and Roster listed a hire date for Staff J CMA as 8/14/25.The facility lacked documentation of verification of Staff J's CMA certification. The facility policy License Verification, revised 2025, stated the facility would verify all personnel certifications.On 5/7/26 at 11:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing(DON) stated CNA verification and criminal background checks should be done before hire.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure prescribed stock medications were available for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #6's April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following orders:a. MiraLax Oral Powder 17 GM/SCOOP (Polyethylene Glycol 3350) Give 17 gram by mouth in the morning for Constipation. The MAR indicated Miralax scheduled to be administered in AM.A review of the April 2026 MAR revealed a code of 11 used for the AM scheduled Miralax on 4/27/26, 4/28/26, 4/29/26, and 4/30/26. Per the MAR Chart Codes, the use of an 11 indicated Med not available.b. Lidocaine External Patch (Lidocaine) Apply to lower back topically two times a day for pain, 4% OTC (over the counter). The MAR indicated the patch to be ON 0800 (8:00 AM) and OFF 2000 (8:00 PM). A review of the April 2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights functioned or were within reach for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for call light accommodations (Residents #1 and #11). The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings included:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included heart failure, depression, and alcohol dependence. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition.On 5/4/26 at 10:46 a.m., Resident #1 stated his call light stopped working 3 weeks ago.On 5/4/26 at 11:24 a.m., Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) pushed the resident's call light and it did not turn on. When she tried it a second time, it turned on but when she tried it a third time, it did not work. On 5/5/26 at 1:48 p.m., the Maintenance Director stated staff did not report that Resident #1's call light did not work prior to yesterday. He stated a new part was needed in order to fix it.On 5/7/26 at 8:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 staff members reviewed for Dependent Adult Abuse(DAA) Mandatory Reporter's Training had current training. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings included:The facility undated New Hire List and Roster listed a hire date for Staff J Certified Medication Aide as 8/14/25.Staff J's personnel file lacked documentation of a DAA Mandatory Reporter's Training completed within 6 months of hire. On 5/7/26 at 9:20 a.m, Staff H Interim Administrator stated that he had no other employee file documentation. He stated he was aware there were concerns with the files.The Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, and Reporting Policy, dated 3/18/26, stated the facility would carry out criminal record checks on all prospective employees and stated within 6 months of hire, each employee was required to complete 2-hour DAA training.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the head of the bed elevated during a continuous tube feeding and failed to apply an abdominal binder per physician order for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for g tube feedings. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 [a code used to indicate an incomplete interview]. The MDS list of diagnosis included paraplegia, non-Alzheimer's dementia and malnutrition. The MDS indicated Resident #1 had a gastric tube with tube feedings continuously.A review of the Care Plan, dated 9/22/25, revealed Resident #1 with the problem of being at risk for altered nutritional status as he was dependent on tube feedings to meet estimated needs. A review of Physician orders revealed:a. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (a tube placed into the stomach for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were re-ordered prior to the exhaustion of the supplying causing 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) to miss three full days of medications. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified Resident #2 with a moderate cognitive impairment based on a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 out of 15. The list of diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat). The MDS documented an admission date of 12/08/2026. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed an ED (Emergency Department Note) dated 1/3/26 which revealed, in part: Chief Complaint.Pt from [name of facility redacted]. Daughter called EMS (emergency medical services) regarding pt cares. Pt missing appointments and medications stopped without explanation. Daughter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include: During an interview on 12/9/25 at 10:00 AM, Staff A, Transportation/Maintenance, while in the hopper room with a contracted plumber, stated the hopper (a specialized, large sink with a toilet- like flush used for hygienic disposal of body waste) is in need of repairs. Staff A stated the hopper had been out of order for a while and the facility initiated the process of getting bids to repair it. Staff A also stated floors in the facility needed cleaning and strippingOn 12/9/2025 from 10:10 AM to 10:30 AM, the following environmental concerns observed:a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the heating/air conditioner unit on the wall under the window had a moderate amount of rust and missing paint.b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor had a heavy buildup of dirt/dark substance throughout. The heating/air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medication as the physician prescribed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #3). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had no cognitive impairment based on Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. The list of diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, and diabetes.During an interview on 12/9/25 at 9:00 AM, Resident #2 stated she did not receive pain medication on 12/7/25 for approximately 20 hours. Resident #2 stated she knew the medication would run out and was told not to worry. Resident #2 stated on 12/7/25 she received a dose at 3:00 AM, and the next dose at 9:00 PM. Resident #2 stated she did receive an alternative medication but it was not effective. Review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a restorative program for 3 of 3 residents (Resident # 1, #3, #4) at risk of physical decline related to diagnosis and risk of falls. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed the resident ambulated independently and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pain and diabetes. Review of Resident #1 Care Plan, date revised 10/24/25 revealed a Focus area to address [Name redacted, Resident #1] is at risk of falls related to impaired balance, poor safety awareness, neuromuscular/functional impairment and/or the use of medications that may increase falls risks related to dx (diagnosis) of chronic pain, DM2 (diabetes), HTN (hypertension), CKD4 (chronic kidney disease stage 4), incontinence, and drug induced akathisia (movement disorder). Interventions included, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. The facility reported a census of 43. Findings include: During a continuous observation on 12/8/2025, the call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] activated at 10:40 AM, and remained on until answered at 10:58 AM. During a continuous observation on 12/9/2025, the call light for Resident #6's room (#42) activated at 12:15 PM. The resident observed in bed, lying on her right side with her head against the side rail. The resident's lunch tray sat on the bedside table near the bed. At 12:38 PM, the call light turned off. At 12:40 PM, during an interview, Resident #6 stated Staff B, Nurse Practitioner helped her. The resident positioned in the bed, with the head of the bed elevated, and her head rested on a pillow. The resident began to eat lunch. Staff B stated the resident prefers to eat in her room, in bed. During an interview on 12/9/25 at 12:45 PM, Staff C, Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, facility staff interviews and physician/provider interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 7 resident records reviewed (Resident's #1 and #5), failed to complete appropriate wound condition assessments (Resident's #1 and #5), and documented that physician ordered dressing/wound care treatments were completed as prescribed over a 4 day period, when the prescribed wound care treatments were not completed or attempted, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with wounds (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 44 residents.Findings include:1.The 7/21/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility 7/17/25 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, postprocedural shock unspecified, initial encounter, dependent on staff to reposition, transfer, toilet, dress and bathe, unable to stand or ambulate, and substantial staff assistance required to sit from lying and to lie from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents when staff used a nicotine vape pen in the common areas of the facility. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: Observations during the survey week of 5/5/25 to 5/8/25 revealed an outdoor smoking area located off the dining room. During an interview on 5/7/25 at 12:24 PM, Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she caught Staff H, Activities staff vaping in her office. She stated her office was off the dining room and her door was open. She stated there were residents in the dining room at the time. During an interview on 5/7/25 at 12:49 AM Staff F, Certified Medication Assistant(CMA) stated Staff H inside her office and also during bingo while she sat right next to residents. She stated Staff C, Office Staff also vaped in her office. During an interview on 5/8/25 at 11:32 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she observed Staff H vape in her office and directed her to stop doing this. She stated the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and care plan for a resident to self-administer medications (Resident #42) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medications. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool for Resident #42, dated 4/25/25, list of diagnoses included: heart failure, diabetes, and shortness of breath. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan, Date Initiated: 11/1/24 included a Focus area to Address {Name redacted} is on diuretic therapy (medications used to treat fluid retention) r/t (related to) hypertension. Review of the May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 1/21/25 order for bumetanide (a diuretic) 1 milligrams(mg) twice daily at am and lunch. During an observation on 5/5/25 at 12:07 PM, Resident #42 laid in bed and had a pill in a medication cup in front of him on his bedside table. The resident stated it was a pill to make him urinate. He stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of Medicare Non-Coverage upon discharge from skilled nursing services to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Assessment for Resident #45, dated 5/1/25, identified the resident had a planned discharge from Part A, Medicare services, and discharged to the resident's home. The MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #45 capable of independently understanding written instructions. During an interview on 5/6/25 at 10:45 AM, the Administrator reported an inability to find a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for Resident #45. The Administrator reported Staff B, Social Worker (SW), took over the responsibility of completing the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) and NOMNC with residents from the business office staff recently; approximately 2 weeks after the social worker started on 3/7/25. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess the resident and notify the physician after 1 of 3 residents' (Resident #9) self-reported seizure activity. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/06/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS list of diagnoses included: seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis, cerebrovascular accident (CVA or stroke), schizophrenia, and depression. The MDS identified Resident #9 took anticonvulsant (anti-seizure) medications. Review of the Care Plan, Date Initiated: 7/24/14, Revision on: 2/11/25 revealed a Focus area to address [Name redacted] has a seizure disorder r/t (related to) Epilepsy. Interventions directed, in part: a. POST SEIZURE TREATMENT: Turn on side with head back, hyper-extended to prevent aspiration, Keep airway open, After seizure take vital signs and neuro check, Monitor for aphasia, headache, altered LOC (level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident positioned in a safe manner when eating for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings included: 1. The MDS assessment tool for Resident #25, dated 2/21/25, list of diagnoses included: hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), cerebral infarction (stoke), and difficulty walking. The BIMS score of 10 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Care Plan, Date Initiated: 3/1/22 revealed a Focus area to address [Name redacted] has potential for altered nutritional status AEB PMHx of CI (as evidenced by past medical history of cerebral infarction), hemiplegia, anemia, hx of mild protein-calorie malnutrition dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During an observation on 5/5/25 at 11:57 AM, Resident #25 laid in bed with a tray of food on a bedside table on the side of the bed. The head of the bed was less than 15 degrees. When interviewed, Resident #25 stated she could eat in that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to attempt to restore or improve bladder function for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary incontinence (Resident #42); and the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter collection bag and tubing secured in a manner that prevented contact with the floor in a an attempt to prevent the potential for a urinary tract infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed with catheters. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/25/25, diagnoses list for Resident #42 included; heart failure, diabetes, and shortness of breath. The MDS stated the resident was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS stated the facility did not carry out a trial of a toileting program. Review of the Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by not priming an insulin pen prior to the administration of the medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for insulin. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, date 4/9/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #22 which included diabetes, depression, and lack of coordination. The MDS indicated Resident #22 received insulin injections 7 of the 7 days during the review period. During an observation on 5/7/25 at 11:34 AM, Staff A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained a blood sugar on Resident #22 which measured 209 mg/dl. Staff A then dialed up four units on the resident's Humalog KwikPen and stated she was ready to inject the medication. Staff A stated she did not prime the pen because on this type of pen, it was only required to prime during the first use. Staff A proceeded to inject the resident with four units of insulin from the pen. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and observations the facility failed to employ an Infection Prevention Specialist. The facility reported a census of 45. Findings include: Observation of a facility provided list of all staff on 3/3/25 at approximately 10:00 am failed to include an Infection Prevention Specialist or and Infection Control Nurse. During an interview with Staff F-Administrator on 3/4/25 at 9:00 am, she stated that approximately 1 month ago she lost her Director of Nurses and Assistant Director of Nurses. She stated the Assistant Director of Nurses did the infection control for the facility and she did not have anyone to fulfill this role as she left. Staff F stated she has not been able to find an appropriate replacement for the Infection Control Nurse until yesterday.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow standard and transmission-based precautions to prevent spread of infections for 4 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #2,#3,#4,#5). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had no cognitive impairment, transferred from one surface to another with a mechanical lift, had a surgical wound and diagnoses including orthopedic conditions, viral hepatitis, complete amputation right foot, frostbite hand, and skin graft. The resident's Care Plan identified a Focus area that required EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) related to the presence of skin grafts/frostbite wounds to bilateral hands/feet and incision site to LBKA (below the knee amputation) initiated 2/6/2025. The Care Plan directed staff to use EBP during completion of high contact activities, adhere to the use of EBP once instituted, and protection will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident council minutes, call light logs, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to answer resident's call lights within 15 minutes for 4 of 4 activated call lights reviewed. The facility reported a census of 44. Findings include: On 1/13/25 at 7:40 am, 4 call lights observed blinking (activated by residents to request assistance) on the East Hall, for rooms 31, 37, 38 and 45. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) noted to be passing medications to residents in the East Hall. When interviewed, Staff A stated she is the only staff person on that wing at this time because the aide who was scheduled to come in at 6:00 am had not arrived to work yet. She stated the aide will be coming but does not know when she will arrive. Observation on 1/13/25 at 7:30 am, revealed Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) arrived to work, stating she had car troubles this am which made her late. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 11:30 am, Resident #6 stated the staff sometimes do not answer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal hygiene practices to prevent contamination of food when staff failed to wear beard guards while in the kitchen area. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: In an observation on 7/16/24 at 2:45 PM, 2 male dietary employees were noted to be working in the kitchen area with hair nets on but no beard guards in place to cover their facial hair. In an interview on 7/16/24 at 2:55 PM, the Dietary Manager stated it was the expectation that facial hair be covered. He reported he hadn't noticed the staff were not wearing the beard guards. They have the beard guards available and he would have the staff start wearing them. He stated they had worn them in the past. A facility provided policy titled Sanitation - Personal Hygiene, stated the staff were to wear hair restraints at all times and beard guards were to be worn by all male employees with facial hair.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to uphold resident rights and dignity for 1 of 1 residents reviewed on hospice care. The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: Resident #17 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive loss. The Resident required substantial to maximal assistance (the helper does more than half the effort. The helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) for eating (ability to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow food and/or liquid one the meal is placed before the resident). The MDS documented diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with hemiparesis (a condition that causes partial paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and the presence of hospice care services. The Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standard regarding medication administration and following physician orders for 2 of 9 residents reviewed (Resident #31 and #32). Staff failed to monitor and stay with residents who did not have an order for self-medications to ensure the medications were taken as ordered. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia. In an observation on 7/15/24 at 11:35 AM, a medication cup with 2 white tablets was noted on Resident #31's bedside table. Resident #31 reported the medication was Tylenol. Resident #31 reported the staff thought she was going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to protect a resident from hazards in the environment for 1 of 1 resident sampled when Resident #4 acquired first degree burns from spilt coffee and failed to ensure a resident was properly assessed to be independent to smoke, followed the facility smoking policy and discarded cigarette butts into a proper receptacle (Resident #28). The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 indicating a severe cognitive impairment. The resident exhibited inattention (being easily distractible/difficulty keeping on track of what is said) that fluctuated; continuously present disorganized thinking (rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear, illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject); delusions; physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care to prevent potential cross contamination that could lead to a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Resident #17 and #41). The facility identified a census of 46 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #17 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 1 indicating severe cognitive impairment with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia (a symptom that causes paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body). The MDS documented Resident #17 as dependent upon staff for managing his urinary catheter for a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. The Care Plan revised 2/20/23 documented the use of a suprapubic catheter and directed the staff in the following: a. The Resident's suprapubic catheter changed at the urology clinic monthly. Date Initiated 3/06/2024. b. The Resident has an 18 French…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document if the resident's emergency contact picked up the resident personal possessions after his death for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for personal possessions (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The Progress Note dated [DATE] at 10:52 PM, revealed the medical examiner called and said that the resident was deceased at the ER (Emergency Room). The Progress Note dated [DATE] at 11:29 PM, revealed the nurse able to get in contact with the emergency contact at 11:20 AM. Emergency contact said that the hospital already called and informed her of the resident's passing. Emergency contact requested that all the valuables and belongings be kept for her to pick up tomorrow. She also would like a copy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform complete incontinent cares following urinary incontinence for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinent cares (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #15 required dependence on staff for toilet hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, and transferring. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance and End-Stage Renal Disease. The Care Plan, revised 02/16/24, revealed Resident #15 had a focus area for mixed bladder incontinence related to dementia with interventions to check resident as required for incontinence and wash, rinse, and dry perineum (vaginal and rectal areas), and change clothing as needed after incontinence episodes. The Weekly Skin Assessment, dated 02/21/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all of the residents were accounted for after they responded to and turned off a door alarm, which resulted in an elopement of a resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for adequate supervision of residents (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident independent with walking 150 feet in a corridor or a similar space. The MDS revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia (e.g. schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders). The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 12/20/23 for high elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness and a lack of impulse control. The interventions dated 12/20/23 revealed distract resident from wandering/exit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 out of 15 residents who smoked was smoking in a designated area, used the appropriate receptacles for discarding cigarette butts and failed to ensure the safety of all residents when the identified resident, with cognitive impairment and symptoms of delirium present, smoked in their resident room on repeated occasions (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings Include: The 7/13/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Tool documented Resident #1 admitted to the facility 6/21/23 with diagnoses that included cancer with malignant neoplasm, intestine perforation, conduct disorder and left ankle and foot pain, scored 11 out of 15 possible points on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment that indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS identified the resident with symptoms of delirium that included disorganized thoughts and inattention, always present and fluctuated in severity, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident, staff and Pharmacist interviews, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to order a resident's narcotic pain medication in a timely manner that causing an interruption of continuous pain management and control for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #1) that required Fentanyl (a very strong narcotic analgesic), and failed to notify the Physician/Provider of record of the resident's repeated increased severe pain ratings and seek appropriate interventions that addressed the increased pain level. The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings Include: The 7/13/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility 6/21/23 with diagnoses that included cancer with malignant neoplasm, rectal and anal hemorrhage, intestine perforation, and left ankle and foot pain, scored 11 out of 15 possible points on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment indicating mild cognitive impairment, and the resident always able to make herself understood and always able to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIRCHWOOD FOUNDATION LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| VIRTUS EQUITY LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| DOLE, ISAAC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2025 |
| BIRCHWOOD HEALTHCARE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2025 |
| CAMPBELL STREET IA 10 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| HOLDCO, IA, 10, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2025 |
| CALVIN, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| KENNEAVY, CASEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| MATHEW, STANLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| SATTERFIELD, BRENDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| 5V+ SENIORS HEALTHCARE FUND GP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2025 |
| 5V+ SENIORS HEALTHCARE FUND, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2025 |
| ACD CONSOLIDATED LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| BEAR CREEK SRAF GP HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| BEAR CREEK STRATEGIC REAL ASSETS FUND LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| DAVIS SQUARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2025 |
| DEFRANCO INVESTMENT CO LTD | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| IAGA SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2025 |
| IAGA SNF IOWA CITY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| IAGA SNF PORTFOLIO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2025 |
| NAP HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165198. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.