Alden Of Waterford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 396 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 140 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to send a resident to the hospital in a timely manner when they became aware of the resident's critically low potassium level (2.4mmol (millimoles)/L (liter) with a reference range of 3.3-5.1). This failure resulted in R76 going into cardiac arrest, requiring CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) and expiring at the hospital on [DATE]. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R76) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 4:49 PM when V10 Registered Nurse (RN) was made aware of R76's critically low potassium level by the laboratory, received orders to send R76 to the Emergency Room, called the local private ambulance service and became aware of the 1-2 hour delay in the expected arrival of the local private ambulance service, and then failed to immediately call 911 for EMS (Emergency Medical Services) to transport R76 to the Emergency Room. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for residents with vascular ulcers. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. On 1/26/26 at 9:48 AM, V3 (Wound Nurse) provided wound care to R2's vascular wound. R2 was lying in his bed with bilateral protective boots in place. R2's right lower extremity did not have a dressing in place, his right leg was discolored, reddened, with two open areas to the lower leg. V3 cleansed the skin with wound cleanser, applied xeroform, gauze wrap and elastic bandage. R3's left lower leg was reddened and discolored, V3 applied the elastic bandage to his left lower leg. On 1/26/26 at 10:00 AM, R2 said his right leg had a dressing on until recently when he had his shower they removed the dressing. R2 said he had his shower yesterday. On 1/26/26 at 10:30 AM, V3 said she did not know R2's dressing was removed. If a dressing, gets removed it should be re-applied. V3 said maybe the staff removed it when he had his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received restorative walking services. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for restorative services in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he has diagnoses including COPD, hypertensive heart disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic venous ulcers to bilateral lower extremities, PVD, history of falling, and heart disease. On 1/26/26 at 9:45 AM, R1 was sitting in his wheelchair he said he is going out for an outpatient appointment this morning. A rolling walker was in his room against the wall. At 1:50 PM, R1 was in his wheelchair in the activity room. R1 said his therapy was discontinued due to his insurance coverage. R1 said he has a walker in his room, and he walks sometimes by himself because staff don't offer to walk with him. On 1/26/26 at 10:21 AM, V4 (RN) said R1 is alert and oriented, compliant with care, has a walker, but she has not seen him walk often. V4 said she does not see…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored in their medication dispensing machine for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of seven.The findings include:The Lab Progress Note for R1 dated 12/4/25 at 7:03 PM showed, V4 (R1's daughter) stated she spoke with V3 Nurse Practitioner NP regarding increased temperature 100.2 degrees Fahrenheit at this time. Per V4, V3 will order intravenous IV antibiotic Imipenem. Will endorse to night shift to carry out order and administer.The Physician's Orders for R1 showed Imipenem-Cilastatin Intravenous Solution 500 MG, use 1 dose IV one time daily for febrile illness was ordered on 12/5/25 to start on 12/5/25.R1's Medication Administration Record dated December 2025 showed he had Imipenem-Cilastatin Intravenous Solution 500 MG ordered to be given on 12/5/25 at 6:00 AM and showed a 9 documented at that time which meant to see progress notes.The Progress Notes for R1 showed, 12/5/25 at 7:14 AM - Imipenem-Cilastatin Intravenous IV solution 500 MG, use 1 dose IV one time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for improper nursing in the sample of 5. The findings include: 1.R1's EMR (electronic data sheet) showed that R1 was admitted to facility on April 18, 2024, with multiple diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, paraplegia, schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure.R1's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated October 8, 2025, showed that R1 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for showers/bathing.On November 14, 2025, at 11:45 AM, R1 was lying in bed in a hospital gown and stated that she needed assistance of one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) for bed baths, R1 stated From what I hear from the CNA's that they don't schedule enough staff. I get bed baths. I am supposed to get showers on Wednesdays and Sundays. The CNAs are darling but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify local law enforcement after an allegation of physical abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for physical abuse in the sample of 3. The findings include:R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and pulmonary hypertension. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 12, 2025, showed R1 was cognitively intact. The facility's final report dated August 30, 2025, completed by V1 (Administrator) showed, . On August 24, 2025, it was reported to the Administrator by the nurse on duty that [R1] believes she was 'smacked in the face' by her CNA. CNA was suspended pending investigation. Body check was completed with no new findings, no bruising, no swelling, no alterations to her face. Physician notified. [R1] and Daughter were informed of investigation process. The [local police department] responded to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for a resident. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R1) who was reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: On 05/28/2025 at 8:35 AM, V10 (R1's family member) stated that on the evening of 05/22/2025, R1 experienced a change in condition and the facility did not notify the physician before a nurse increased oxygen from 2 liters to 4 liters via nasal cannula. On 05/28/2025 at 1:30 PM, V4 LPN (Agency-License Practical Nurse) stated that she worked with R1 for the first time and took the report from the morning nurse. She was not aware that she had not notified the provider. V4 said the staff involved in assessing R1 said being lethargic is R1's baseline. When R1 was excessively sweating and his oxygen saturation was at 89 percent around 9:00 PM, V10 arrived and requested that R1 be transferred to the hospital. V4 said she called 911 and transferred R1 to the hospital. On 05/28/2025 at 6:00 PM, V3 (LPN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately assess a resident after a reported change in condition. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) who was reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) shows R1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], and R1's diagnoses include acute and chronic respiratory failure with low oxygen and high carbon dioxide, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, multiple cardiac diseases, stage five chronic kidney/end-stage renal disease, anemia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, and dependence on supplement oxygen. R1's Minimum Data Set indicated that R1's cognition was intact but dependent on staff for activities of daily living. On 05/28/2025 at 10:45 AM, R2 (R1's spouse) said R1 was sick in the evening of Thursday (05/22/2025), and V3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) did not come to check on him when V5 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) called her for R1's lethargy and not eating his meals. R2 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit accurate licensed nurses working hours, for the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) submission for the months of July, August and September 2024. This applies to all 75 residents who reside in the facility, according to form 671 dated March 24, 2025. The findings include: The CASPER (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting) for the facility's Quarter 4, 2024, showed for the metrics, no RN hours and Failed to have Licensed Nurse coverage 24 hours /day, infraction dates of every day from July1, 2024 through September 30, 2024. On March 24, 2025, at 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the PBJ hours are submitted from the payroll data through the corporate office. V1 acknowledged that the hours for licensed nurse staffing for the facility for Quarter 4 were not accurately reported. V1 provided documentation of email communication between the corporate office, and HFS (Department of Healthcare and Family Services) dated December 23, 2024, identifying the error in PBJ data submission for CNA (Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely accounting of controlled medications. This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R2, R18, R21, R24, R48, R69 and R234) reviewed for controlled medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On March 26, 2025 at 11:25 AM, the first floor AB medication cart was observed with V2 (Director of Nursing). The following observations were made of the medication cart's controlled drug compartment: - R69 had a blister pack of Alprazolam 0.5 mg (milligrams) with 47 tablets remaining that were intact and sealed. R69's controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form for the Alprazolam 0.5 mg showed that there should be 48 tablets remaining in the blister pack. R69's medication administration audit report showed that V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered this medication at 9:28 AM on March 26, 2025. - R234 had a blister pack of Modafinil 200 mg with 29 tablets remaining that were intact and sealed. R234's controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form for the Modafinil 200 mg showed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu extension sheet to serve portion sizes as shown for pureed and mechanical soft diets to meet the dietary requirements of the meal. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R3, R27, R33, R59, R69, and R235) reviewed for dining in the sample of 18. The findings include: Facility menu for Spring Summer 2025 for Monday included Country Fried Steak with cream sauce, Mashed Potatoes, [NAME] Beans as the main meal items. The menu extension sheet for March 24, 2024 showed to use #6 scoop for ground country fried steak. The same extension sheet showed to use #6 scoop for pureed country fried steak and #8 scoop for the pureed beans. Facility portion control chart posted at the tray line service area showed that #6=5 1/3 oz/ounce, #8= 4 oz, and #10=3 oz. On March 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM, V6 (Chef) and V7 (Dietary Aide) were plating the food during the lunch meal tray line service on the 1st floor. V6 used a #8 scoop to serve ground country fried steak along with 2 oz gravy to R3, R27, R59, R69 and R235 who were on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$106,499 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $106,499 — penalty dated 2024-04-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL