Alden Poplar Creek Rehab & Hcc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 261 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 91.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 217 beds and averages 168.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering was supervised to prevent elopement. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from a secured memory care unit, exiting the building without staff identifying and preventing R1 from eloping. R1 exited the building and ambulated without her walker crossing a six-lane busy intersection and was found approximately 0.8 miles away from the facility wandering outside of the local grocery store. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 6. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/1/25, when R1 got on the elevators with another resident's family on the secured memory unit. R1 exited the first-floor elevators and ambulated out the front entrance without staff identifying R1 was eloping the facility. R1 exited the building and ambulated without her walker crossing a six-lane busy intersection and was found approximately 0.8 miles away from the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure no delay in care and treatment to a resident with unwitnessed fall that was later diagnosed with fractured left elbow. The facility also failed to revise resident comprehensive care plan in a timely manner for cast management and ADLs (Activity of daily living) limitation affected by cast on left elbow due to fracture. This deficiency affects one (R1) of three residents reviewed for Fall management.Findings include: On 3/11/26 at 10:05AM, V5, Family member, said R1 reported she fell backward in her room on 2/21/26 sometime between 1:30PM to 8:30PM. R1 complained of left elbow pain with limited mobility and swelling. X-ray of elbow was not done until the following evening, 2/22/26. V5 said V6, RN (Registered Nurse), called him around 9:00PM to inform him the x-ray result indicated a fracture of the left elbow. R1 was sent to the hospital emergency room (ER) for further evaluation as ordered by physician. V6 informed him there will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed properly store food in a manner to prevent cross-contamination and failed to label prepared foods stored in the refrigerator. This applies to all residents residing in the facility.The findings include:The CMS 671 form, dated 12/2/25, showed there were 164 residents residing in the facility.On 12/2/25 at 9:40 AM, there was a cardboard box of cornflakes on the floor of the dry storage room. The surveyor showed V10 (Hostess/Assistant Supervisor) the box and asked if food should be stored on the floor. V10 replied, No that shouldn't be on the floor because the floor may be dirty and there is a risk of cross contamination. At 9:43 AM, there were two boxes of food (1 with elote and another with baguettes) on the floor of the left side of the freezer. The boxes were frozen to the floor of the freezer. On the right side there was a box of unknown food and a black plastic bag on the floor of the freezer. The surveyor asked V10 what was in the box. V10 attempted to pull the box out from under the shelving but was unable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's provider of elevated blood glucose levels. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R34) reviewed for notification in the sample of 45. The findings include:R34's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed a current admission date of 11/9/24, with diagnoses to include but not limited to, diabetes type2, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). R34's Order Summary Report (physician orders) showed an order for rapid acting insulin before meals. The order shows the amount of insulin to be given is dependent upon R34's blood sugar value. The order shows if R34's blood sugar is greater than 350, then the nurse should give 10 units of rapid acting insulin and call the provider. (All blood sugar values are in milligrams per deciliter.) R34's October 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed on 10/1/25 a blood sugar of 378 prior to his evening meal. The MAR showed a value of 351 on 10/3/25 prior to his noon meal. The MAR showed a value of 359 on 10/12/25 prior to his evening meal. R34's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided in a manner to prevent contamination of the wound bed for 1 of 8 residents (R144) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 45.The findings include:R144's admission Record showed diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting his left non-dominant side, a stage IV pressure ulcer of left heel, muscle spasms, and pain in his left foot. R144's care plan initiated on 5/2/2025 showed he has an actual alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by an abrasion to his left anterior ankle and a pressure injury to his left heel. R144's Order Summary Report showed an active order to clean the abrasion to his left anterior ankle, apply (a dressing designed to maintain moisture to the wound bed), and cover with a foam dressing. The report also showed an active order to cleanse R144's left heel with saline, paint with betadine, apply (dressing designed to maintain moisture to the wound bed), and cover with a foam dressing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ordered treatment for contractures. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R89) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 45. The findings include:R89's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include but not limited to, paralysis to his right side due to a stroke, dementia, and nerve pain. R89's 10/30/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed he had severe cognitive impairment. R89's Order Summary Report (Physician Order Sheet, POS; as of 12/4/25) showed an order started on 9/10/24 for [cotton gauze wrap] to right hand during the day and off at night, can remove for skin checks. On 12/04/2025 at 9:49 AM, R89's right hand appeared contracted. R89 did not have a (cotton gauze) wrap in or around his right hand. On 12/04/2025 at 9:57 AM, V6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she has provided care for R89. V6 stated she believed the order was not a wound dressing, but a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident in a safe manner. This applies to one two (R136) reviewed for safety in the sample of 45.The findings include: The facility face sheet for R136 shows she has diagnoses to include vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity and history of falls. The facility assessment for R136, dated 10/30/2025, shows she has moderate cognitive impairment and requires touching assistance from staff with toilet transfers. The care plan for R136, dated 8/19/2024, shows she has poor safety awareness and poor endurance and an intervention to use a gait belt for transfers and ambulation was in place.On 12/2/2025 at 10:21 AM, R136 was being assisted to the toilet by V7, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). V7 pushed R136 up to the toilet and told her to stand up. V7 was using the back of R136's pants to help stabilize R136 as she stood and pivoted to the toilet. When R136 was finished using the toilet, V7 told R136 to stand up and she would clean her up. As R136 was standing and V7 was cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address a recommendation by the Registered Dietitian to increase a resident's enteral feeding for 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for tube feedings in the sample of 45. The findings include: R5's admission Record, provided by the facility on 12/4/2025, showed diagnoses including, but not limited to adult failure to thrive, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, encounter for attention to gastrostomy (feeding tube), memory deficit following cerebrovascular disease, adjustment disorder, epilepsy, depression, and aphasia following cerebral infarction (a language disorder caused by brain damage-often from a stroke, injury, or tumor-that impairs speaking, understanding speech, reading, and writing). On 12/2/2025 at 11:32 AM, R5 was lying in bed. The head of R5's bed was up 45 degrees. No signs of distress were noted. A feeding delivery system was next to R5's bed, not running. Supplies for R5's tube feedings were in her room. A review of R5's electronic medical record showed current orders for enteral feedings of 960…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for the administration of oxygen for 1 of 1 resident (R122) reviewed for oxygen services in the sample of 45.The findings include:R122's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility 10/8/25, with diagnoses to include chronic kidney disease, chronic respiratory failure, chronic congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, muscle weakness, depression, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R122's facility assessment, dated 10/15/25, showed she has mild cognitive deficit and requires assistance with transfers. R122's December 2025 Physician Order Sheet showed, Respiratory: Oxygen per nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute continuous. R122's care plan, initiated 10/21/25, showed, [R122] requires oxygen therapy; Continuous in Dx of Chronic Respiratory Failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia. Interventions/Tasks. Adjust oxygen to maintain saturation within adequate parameters. R1's vital signs record for the morning of 12/4/25 showed R1's oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove soiled gloves before touching any other clean surfaces. This applies to one of Six residents (R136) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 45.The findings include:On 12/2/2025 at 10:21 AM, R136 was being assisted to the toilet by V7, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). R136 had been incontinent of stool and V7 was cleaning her up standing in the bathroom. V7 wiped R136 and cleaned her skin of stool. V7 never removed her soiled gloves and then pulled up R136's pants and rubbed R136's back to comfort her. The facility face sheet for R136 shows she has diagnoses to include vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity and history of falls. The facility assessment for R136, dated 10/30/2025, shows she has moderate cognitive impairment and requires touching assistance from staff with toilet transfers and toileting hygiene.On 12/4/2025 at 10:47 AM, V8, CNA, said gloves should be changed when they become soiled and the hands should be cleaned before putting on clean gloves.On 12/4/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the decisions of a hospice resident's health care Power of Attorney for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for rights exercised by a resident's representative in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's facility care plan, dated 8/13/24, showed R1 was under hospice care due to her diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain, cerebral atherosclerosis, and dementia. R1 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for cares. The plan showed, Coordinate care and services between facility caregivers and hospice company to ensure all resident needs are met . Obtain advanced care planning wishes of patient and family and incorporate them into the plan of care . R1's Power of Attorney for Health Care form, dated 11/23/2018, showed V10 (Family of R1) was R1's healthcare Power of Attorney (POA). The form showed R1 authorized V10 to make decisions for R1 when R1 could no longer make decisions for herself. The form showed R1 did not want any treatment to prolong her life, but wanted treatment to ensure comfort and no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL