Alden Long Grove Rehab &hc Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 248 beds and averages 169.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 78 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.74 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.53 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for R1 and failed to substantiate an allegation. This failure resulted in allowing V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) access to all residents in the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents residing within the facility.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/28/26 when R1's initial report of sexual abuse was reported to V3 (Social Services Director) and V1 (Administrator). V4 returned to the facility for his scheduled shifts on 3/2/26, 3/3/26, 3/5/26, and 3/6/26. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/10/26 at 10:46 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/10/26, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.The findings include:R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a resident (R1) from sexual abuse from a staff member (V4). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in V4 climbing into bed with R1, rubbing the side of R1's breast, and making sexually inappropriate comments such as 'you could be my girlfriend', 'you know you want it', and 'come on honey'. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/28/26 when R1's initial report of sexual abuse was reported to V3 (Social Services Director) and V1 (Administrator) as happening a couple of days ago. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/10/26 at 10:46 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/10/26, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. The findings include:R1's face sheet showed she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise one of three residents (R1) with a history of exit seeking and at risk for falling, failed to ensure a resident with a history of exit seeking room was not near an exit, and failed to ensure a door alarm sounded when an exit door was opened in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 falling down the stairs, experiencing a fibular fracture which contributed to R1 being hospitalized . This failure has the potential to affect all ambulatory residents in the memory care unit. The Immediate Jeopardy began on June 9, 2024 when R1 went out of an exit door and fell down the stairs and obtained a fibular fracture. V1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on June 19, 2024 at 12:21 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was: Removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on June 10, 2024, prior to the start of the survey.This past compliance occurred from 6-9-24 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-04-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident related to right tibia fracture. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing severe pain without receiving ordered pain medication for approximately 24 hours. This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 7. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including displaced fracture of right tibia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, difficulty walking, and history of falls. On 4/6/26 at 10:33 AM, R1 was in her room laying in bed. R1 said she came to the facility after falling at home and fracturing her right knee. R1 said she is non-weight bearing to her right lower extremity and wears the immobilizer when she is out of bed. R1 said she was having a lot of pain to her right knee when she came to the facility and increased pain after therapy. She was getting hydrocodone (opioid) pain medication every four…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a JP (Jackson Pratt) drain dressing was changed as ordered. This failure resulted in R22's JP drain site not being assessed for 11 days and becoming infected. The facility also failed to change non-pressure dressings as ordered and failed to ensure a resident's elastic wraps were applied to lower legs as ordered. This applies to 3 of 32 residents (R22, R37 & R113) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. On December 2, 2024 at 9:20 AM, R22 was lying in bed. He had a tube with a bulb hanging from his stomach. He stated, that was his JP drain because he needed his gallbladder out. He showed this surveyor the dressing on the drain. The dressing was dated November 21, 2024 (11 days prior). He stated, no one does anything with it. They don't change the dressing or empty it. He empties it himself. On December 3, 2024 at 2:09 PM, V5 (Wound Care Nurse/WCN) was changing R22's dressing to his JP drain. The dressing was still dated November 21, 2024 (same dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance to a resident that required staff assistance to eat for 1 of 32 residents (R1) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 32.The findings include:R1's hospice admission order dated 8/14/25 showed R1 was admitted to hospice due to his diagnoses of dementia and severe protein calorie malnutrition. R1's weight record showed R1 lost 23.8 pounds from 8/21/25 to 1/9/26.R1's resident assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 required partial to moderate staff assistance to eat.R1's current care plan showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired. The plan showed, Set up resident's tray and provide assist or cueing for meals as needed.On 1/12/25 from 9:15 AM-9:40 AM, a continuous observation of R1 was made by this surveyor. From 9:15 AM-9:40 AM, R1 was seated in a high back wheelchair in the dining room. R1's face was thin. R1 appeared gaunt. R1's breakfast tray was in front of him on a table. A serving of pureed eggs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a paraplegic resident that is unable to move her lower extremities received services to prevent a decrease in range of motion for 1 of 12 residents (R13) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 32.The findings include:R13's Face Sheet shows that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: cord compression, polyneuropathy, edema, necrotizing vasculopathy, radiculopathy and lupus.R13's Physical Therapy Discharge Summary shows that she received physical therapy from 9/13/25 to 10/10/25. Upon discharge, she was able to perform bed mobility with supervision assist. Discharge Status and Recommendations show, To facilitate patient maintaining current level of performance and in order to prevent decline, development of and instruction in the following RNPs (Restorative Nursing Program) has been completed with the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team): bed mobility, ROM (Passive) and transfers.On 1/12/26 at 9:51 AM, R13 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention of wheelchair anti-tip bars were facing downward for 1 of 32 residents (R47) reviewed for safety in the sample of 32.The findings include:R47's Fall assessment dated [DATE] showed R47 was at risk for falls.On 01/13/2026 at 9:52 AM, R47 was sitting in her wheelchair attempting to self-propel. R47 had anti-tip bars on her wheelchair. The anti-tip bars were angled upward.On 01/13/2026 at 10:19 AM, V11 (Restorative Nurse) said anti-tip bars are a fall prevention intervention and should be pointed downward to help prevent the wheelchair from tipping backward. V11 confirmed R47's wheelchair anti-tip bars were facing upward. V11 said V12 (Maintenance Director) was responsible for installing and making sure the anti-tip bars were in the correct position. On 01/13/2026 at 12:01 PM, V12 said maintenance does not install anti-tip bars on wheelchairs and it was the responsibility of the nursing staff to ensure the bars are positioned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received their dietary supplements for 1 of 7 residents (R67) reviewed for dietary supplements in the sample of 32. The findings include:R67's Order Summary Report printed on 1/14/26 showed R67 was to receive fortified pudding with breakfast, lunch, and dinner and a (high calorie and protein supplement) cup with lunch and dinner.A facility assessment with an effective date of 10/1/25 showed R67 was mentally intact. On 01/12/2026 at 9:28 AM, R67 was in bed eating his breakfast. There was a meal ticket on his tray that indicated he was to receive fortified pudding. There was no pudding on his tray. R67 confirmed he did not receive pudding. On 01/12/2026 at 1:01 PM, R67 was in the dining room eating lunch R67 was not served a (high calorie and protein supplement) cup. R67's meal ticket, that was on the table, indicated R67 was to receive a (high calorie and protein supplement) cup.On 01/12/2026 at 1:18 PM, R67 had finished…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medication were stored in a safe manner for 1 of 32 residents (R44) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 32.The findings include:On 1/12/2026 at 10:29 AM, R44 had nasacort nasal spray, systane eye drops and a bottle of ammonium lactate 12% lotion sitting on a shelf in her room. R44 said that she uses the cream on her legs and the eye drops two to three times a week. R44 said that she uses the nasal spray as she feels she needs it but was not sure how often. R44's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) shows an order for ammonium lactate to be applied to her bilateral legs every 12 hours as needed. No orders were found for Systane eye drops or Nasacort nasal spray. R44's POS does not show an order for self-administration of medications. A Nursing Note dated 11/14/25 shows, Writer spoke with resident and advised her she cannot buy OTC medications and/or keep them in her room and self-administer.R44's Care Plan does not document that she is able to self-administer medications safely.On 1/13/26 at 1:55…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident's requested food preferences for 1 of 32 residents (R1) reviewed for food preferences/choices in the sample of 32.The findings include:R1's hospice admission order dated 8/14/25 showed R1 was admitted to hospice due to his diagnoses of dementia and severe protein calorie malnutrition. R1's weight record showed R1 lost 23.8 pounds from 8/21/25 to 1/9/26.R1's current care plan showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired. The plan showed R1 requires nutritional support. No pork, no beef, no pasta. On pleasure feeding. Per family request, grilled cheese, no crust with meals. Honor food preferences. On 1/12/26 from 9:15 AM to 9:40 AM, a tray of pureed breakfast foods, including a cup of yogurt, was noted in front of R1. No fruit or banana were noted on R1's tray. R1's meal ticket on R1's tray showed Standing orders > 1 banana. Dislikes bacon, ham, pork, sausage.On 1/13/26 at 8:51 AM, R1's breakfast tray was placed in front of R1. R1's breakfast tray consisted of pureed eggs, a pureed pink…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident on contact and droplet isolation remained in her room with her door closed. The facility failed to educate and redirect a resident to maintain contact and droplet isolation. These failures apply to 1 of 32 residents (R32) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 32.The findings include:A facility isolation list dated 1/12/26 showed by 1/7/26, two residents (R143, R183) in the facility had tested positive for COVID-19. R32's progress note dated 1/9/26 showed R32 developed a cough. R32 was placed on isolation precautions due to her cough. R32's physician order dated 1/9/26 showed, Isolation: Contact and Droplet and N-95 Precautions - Due to suspected Acute Respiratory Illness every shift for 10 days.On 1/12/26 at 9:22 AM, R32 was seated in a wheelchair, in the doorway of her room, actively coughing with no mask on. The door to her room was wide open. A N95 Plus Eye Protection and Contact Precautions sign was noted on the doorframe of R32's room with a cart containing PPE (personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) received medications as ordered by a physician. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications in the sample of 5.The findings include:R1's electronic face sheet printed on 7/24/25 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ESBL, idiopathic scoliosis, and history of falls.R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has no cognitive impairment.R1's physician's orders for July 2025 showed, Enoxaparin Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled Syringe 40mg (milligram)/0.4ML (milliliter). Inject 0.4ml subcutaneously one time a day for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) prophylaxis.On 7/24/25 at 10:36AM, R1 stated, I have missed doses of my Lovenox (Enoxaparin Sodium) before. It was at the beginning of this month. They said it was delivered to the wrong unit but that's not excuse for me to not receive my medication.R1's medication administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered at the ordered/scheduled time for 2 residents (R3 and R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. On 2/10/25 at 9:50AM V3 (RN) was observed passing medications to R3. V3 stated, I'm late with his insulin. V3 then stated that breakfast is served about 8:00 AM, sometimes a little earlier and sometimes a little later. R3's February Medication Administration Record shows that R3 has an order for Insulin Aspart (Fast acting insulin for treating diabetes) 20 units twice a day before meals at 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM. The facility policy entitled Medication Administration dated 9/2020 states, Drugs must be administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. 2. On 2/10/25 at 1:00 PM R1 stated, About 1/2 the times I needed my insulin I would wheel myself to the nurse's station and ask for it, if I didn't then it was late. When I didn't get my insulin before my meal my blood sugars went up to 300-381. (R1 discharged from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a device was applied to a contracted hand for 1 of 6 residents (R24) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 32. The findings include: R24's Physician Order Sheet (POS) show R24 has diagnoses of respiratory failure with tracheostomy. R24's facility assessment show R24 has no cognitive impairment. R24 has trach but able to verbalize her needs by mouthing off her words clearly. On 12/2/24 at 11:30 AM, R24 was sitting in her bed, R24's left hand was in a closed tight fist position. A splint was noted by her bedside still in plastic and another splint by her wheelchair. V8 (Registered Nurse) came to R24's room and tried to apply the splint. Then V8 (RN) went to check R24's medical record. V8 said R24's POS did not show any direction regarding when to wear the splint. On 12/3/24 at 10 AM, R24 said no one exercises her hand and now it was hard to open her left hand. R24's progress notes dated 11/26/24 by V10 (Physician Assistant) shows, Left hand contracture . OT to provide with L (left) resting WHO…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$199,483 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
• $158,650 — penalty dated 2026-03-10
• $10,465 — penalty dated 2024-11-22
• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-06-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL