Alden Estates Of Naperville
1525 South Oxford Lane, Naperville, IL 60565 · For profit - Corporation · 203 certified beds · (630) 983-0300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,256 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-10)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.7% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.05 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.5%CMS range 32.6–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.8–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 59.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.7–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 203 beds and averages 155.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer Insulin as ordered by the physician. The failure resulted in R1 having elevated blood sugars and elevated lab values. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for improper nursing care in the area of missing medication doses in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1). On April 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM, R1 said, I missed my morning dose of insulin (Humulin R U-500) on April 19, 2024. The evening of April 18, they ran out of the insulin and did not have enough to give me a full dose. On April 19, I was supposed to get a second dose at 2:00 PM and they still did not have the insulin in stock. It finally came at 3:00 PM that day. This happens every month. My blood sugars are all over the place and I should not be missing doses. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reorder R3's Vimpat (seizure medication), which led to R3 missing three doses, causing R3 to have a grand mal seizure and hospitalized . This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for significant medication error. The findings include: On [DATE] at 11:18 AM, V19 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said R3 was hospitalized due to a seizure from missing her medication. V19 said she believed someone forgot to reorder her Vimpat. On [DATE] at 02:26 PM, V20 (Family Member) said R3 almost died and was in the hospital after having a grand mal seizure at the facility. V20 said R3 was intubated and was in the neuro ICU (Intensive Care Unit) after the seizure. V20 said V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) disclosed to the ICU nurse that R3 had not received her Vimpat. V20 said R3 missed three doses of the medication because they had run out of the Vimpat. On [DATE] at 10:32 AM, V23 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she took care of R3 and from what she remembered, the Vimpat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored appropriately in the medication cart, medication room, or treatment cart.These failures affected 4 residents (R7, R8, R9, and R10) reviewed for medication labeling and storage and had the potential to affect all 28 residents on one dementia unit on the second floor. Findings include:On [DATE], the census on the second-floor dementia unit was 28 residents.On [DATE] at 12:45 PM, a tour of the unit's medication room and nurses' desk was conducted with V22, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The drawers at the nurses' station contained the following medications and supplies:(1) Two 1,000 mL bags of 5% dextrose IV solution labeled with R9's name.(2) A box containing several 10 mL normal saline flushes.(3) One expired bottle of multivitamin dietary supplement.(4) A box of Relevca lidocaine 4% pain relief patches labeled with R7's name.(5) A tube of B & C ointment for wound dressing labeled with R8's name.(6)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the CPaP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine was changed every three months, failed to keep CPaP parts from environmental contamination, failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of CPaP machine and failed to change a nasal canula every month.These failures affected 2 of 3 (R1 and R3) residents reviewed for respiratory care in the total sample of 10 residents. Findings include: 1. On 05/26/2026 at 11:13am R3's nose piece of R3's CPaP was on the floor. The green tubing connected to the oxygen concentrator and CPaP machine was dated 10/01/2025. V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was present and V7 picked up the nose piece of the CPaP and placed it behind the CPaP machine and stated it should not be on the floor. V7 checked the date on the tubing and stated it was dated 10/01/2025. R3 stated she used the CPaP machine at bedtime.On 05/26/2026 at 11:28am, V2 (Director Of Nursing) stated the nose piece of the CPaP should be in the bag when not in use to lower or prevent the risk infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with transportation to get to medical appointments in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for Quality of Care in the sample of 10. The findings include: R2's face sheet shows he has diagnoses including Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). R2's Physician Order Summary report shows an order was entered on 10/27/25 for R2 to be seen for a GI (Gastroenterologist) consult. On 1/20/26 at 10:41 AM, R2 said he was told that he is supposed to be going out to an appointment to see a GI doctor but has yet to get to see one. On 1/20/26 at 11:24 PM, V4 (Appointment and Transportation Scheduler) said there have been some issues with the transportation company the facility uses and getting residents to appointments on time. V4 said unfortunately there are no back up options that the facility uses to get residents to their appointments. V4 confirmed that she has been trying to get R2 to an appointment with the GI doctor and on 12/23/25 the transportation company called and said they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a resident from cutting his face with a broken razor for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for safety in the sample of 10. The findings include:On 1/20/26 at 1:02 PM, V19 (R5's POA - Power of Attorney) said on 11/21/25 V20 (R5's family member) went to visit R5 and his face was all scratched up with scabbed blood. V19 said V20 immediately took pictures and sent them to her. V19 said the family (V19 and V20) were constantly aware of R5's razor. V19 said on 11/18/25 the razor was in good condition, but on 11/21/25 it wasn't. V19 said she has pictures of all of this. V19 said the head of R5's razor was damaged and there was a big gouge in the metal part. V19 said it appeared as if the razor had been dropped, but no one reported it. V19 said R5 can't use his right arm, and the staff have to hand him his razor. V19 said the staff shouldn't have given R5 a broken razor. V19 said his face was all cut up because they gave him a razor with metal edges…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement wound care interventions as ordered for a resident with pressure injuries.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure injuries.The findings include:On 8/30/2025 at 11:30 AM, R1 was in bed on a regular mattress. V5 (Wound Care Nurse) and V6 (Wound Care Technician) said R1 had multiple wounds identified as present on admission on [DATE], including stage 2 pressure injuries to his right and left buttock areas. V5 said R1's wound care was being managed by the wound physician and R1 required daily dressing changes. V5 continued to say she was concerned because R1's wound showed signs of deterioration today, as evidenced by an increase in size measurement. V5 then assessed R1's pressure injuries, which were open with minor bleeding and had peri-wound irritation. V5 said R1's left buttock wound measured 3 centimeters (cm) x 2 cm x 0.1 cm and the right buttock wound measured 0.6 cm x 0.6 cm x 0.1 cm. V5 said she believed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee met quarterly and the required QAPI committee members attended the meetings. This applies to all 151 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The census roster dated June 10, 2024 showed 151 residents residing in the facility. The facility presented committee meeting attendance records since the last annual survey date of August 30, 2023. The facility provided attendance records dated December 7, 2023, March 14, 2024, and an undated attendance record. The attendance record dated December 7, 2023, did not include the signature of the Infection Preventionist, nor the Medical Director. The attendance record dated March 14, 2024, did not include the signature of the Infection Preventionist, or the Medical Director. The undated attendance record did not contain the signature of the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director, or the Infection Preventionist. On June 12, 2024, at 12:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that the Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pureed and mechanically altered meatballs with sauce for the lunch meal. This applies to 18 of 18 residents (R1, R9, R10, R12, R16, R23, R39, R47, R65, R68, R84, R92, R94, R102, R118, R145, R452, R455) reviewed for dining in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On June 10, 2024 at 9:40 AM, V18 (Cook) was seen putting pureed ground meat with spaghetti sauce that was processed in a blender into serving pans. V18 stated that there are around 13 residents that are on pureed consistency. V18 stated that the item was ready for service after reheating the same. When taste tested the product, there was small lumps of fat and meat particles that were unable to be swallowed without further chewing. V16 (Dietary Supervisor) who was in the vicinity was requested to taste test the same and agreed that the item needs to be processed more. On June 12, 2024 at 9:20 AM, V17 (Dietitian) stated that the pureed foods should have the consistency of mashed potatoes or pudding. Facility Policy titled Puree (dated July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store resident's foods in a safe and sanitary manner in a resident's personal refrigerator. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R106) reviewed for foods brought in from outside in the sample of 30. The findings include: R106's face sheet included diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of head of pancreas, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, alcohol dependence with unspecified alcohol-induced disorder, encounter for palliative care, adult failure to thrive. R106's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated June 4, 2024 showed that R106 is cognitively intact. On June 10, 2024 at 11:51 AM, R106 stated that he orders in own Indian food from outside as he does not care for food here. There was a small refrigerator at bedside but the same was not checked as R106 was having visitors. On June 12, 2024 at 9:53 AM, R106's refrigerator was checked with resident's permission and noted to have 5 clear plastic containers of cooked food items and another item wrapped in silver foil placed over excessive spills and food debris…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary supplies in order to preserve a resident's dignity and privacy needs. This applies to 1 of 30 residents (R40) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 30. The findings include: R40's face sheet showed R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including, chronic diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance. R40's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated May 15, 2024, showed R40 was severely cognitively impaired, and required staff assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including set up assistance with eating and oral hygiene and partial assistance with bed mobility, transfer, toilet hygiene, bathing, and dressing. R40's care plan initiated on January 30, 2023, interventions for incontinence included .Use adult incontinence products as needed . and provide dignity related to the use of incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy regarding grievances/complaints and failed to inform the Administrator/designee upon receipt of the grievance and failed to inform the resident of the results of the investigation. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R138) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 30. The findings include: R138's face sheet showed R138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus type 2, monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and vascular dementia. R138's MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed R138 with moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including supervision with eating, oral hygiene, toilet hygiene and bed mobility, set up assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene, and transfer, substantial assistance with bathing and dependence on staff for lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and provide appropriate splints and therapy services to maintain and/or prevent further progression of deformities or reduction in range of motion. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R2, R23, R102) reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM) in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R2 has multiple diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified, generalized Osteo Arthritis, and Neuralgia according to the face sheet. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 12, 2024, identifies R2 as cognitively intact. R2 has functional limitations of ROM (Range of Motion) to one side of both upper and lower extremities. The same MDS shows R2 requires maximum to total assistance for most ADLs (Activities of daily living). On June 10, 2024 at 12:32 PM, R2 had contractures to the right hand and no splinting device was noted. R2 stated he uses his left hand to assist his right hand to perform basic tasks. R2 stated he is willing to be evaluated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that gastric tube (g-tube) placement was checked prior to flushing the tube and administering medication. The facility also failed to administer g-tube flushes and medications using the proper technique. This applied to 1 of 1 resident (R147) reviewed for g-tube medication administration. The finding included: R147's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonitis due to inhalation of food/vomit, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, protein-calorie malnutrition, Right lung malignant neoplasm, Clostridium Difficile (C-diff) and adult failure to thrive. R147's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated, May 27, 2024, showed R147 was cognitively intact and had history of coughing or choking during meals when swallowing. R147's care plan showed R147 required tube feeding and stoma site care due to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Interventions included . check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the proper infection control practice when caring for a resident in contact isolation. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R147) in sample of 30. The finding included: R147's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonitis due to inhalation of food/vomit, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, protein-calorie malnutrition, Right lung malignant neoplasm, Clostridium Difficile (C-diff) and adult failure to thrive. R147's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated, May 27, 2024, showed R147 was cognitively intact. R147's care plan showed R147 was in a single room, in contact isolation related to C-Diff. Interventions included educate resident and responsible party on isolation precautions. On June 10, 2024 at 8:14 AM, V7 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was in R147's room with the door open, From the hallway V7 was seen standing next to R147's bed wearing gloves but had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from the pharmacy in a timely manner to prevent residents from missing medication doses as ordered by the physician. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R1, R2, and R4) reviewed for improper nursing care in the area of missing medication doses in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. On April 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM, R1 said, I missed my morning dose of insulin (Humulin R U-500) on April 19, 2024. The evening of April 18, they ran out of the insulin and did not have enough to give me a full dose. On April 19, I was supposed to get a second dose at 2:00 PM and they still did not have the insulin in stock. It finally came at 3:00 PM that day. This happens every month. My blood sugars are all over the place and I should not be missing doses. They also ran out of my Vitamin D that I take once a month, and my depression medication. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nebulizer treatments were completed and signed off on the medication administration record. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R10) reviewed for nebulizer treatments in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. On 4/8/24 at 10:00 AM, V21 (R1's family) said on 3/28/24 at 6:00 PM, R1's breathing treatment mask was on the floor and the nebulizer machine was not on. R1's Facesheet dated 4/8/24 shows R1 is diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute and chronic respiratory failure . R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2024 shows that R1 was to receive a treatment of Ipratropium-Albuterol via nebulizer on 3/28/24 at 6:00 AM related to chronic respiratory failure. There are no recorded nurse initials to indicate the medication was provided. 2. On 4/9/24 at 2:53 PM, R10 said that he is supposed to receive nebulizer treatments twice per day. R10 said that staff do not always make sure that he receives two treatments per day. R10's Facesheet dated 4/9/24 shows R10 has COPD. R10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's POA (Power of Attorney) of changes in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for policy and procedures. The findings include: On 02/08/24 at 1:00 PM, R1 was in her room in a wheelchair with her daughter at bedside. R1 was alert and confused. R1 said she previously had pneumonia and problems with her bladder. R1 said she was not sick for a long time before going to the hospital. On 02/08/24 at 12:10 PM, V3 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) said she has been the CNA for R1 in the past and is taking care of her today. V3 said when R1 was coughing and had a loss of appetite last month, she reported it to the nurse. On 02/08/24 at 12:48 PM, V4 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said she takes care of R1 3 days a week. V4 said she was taking care of R1 when she became ill on 01/01/24. V4 said R1 was coughing. V4 said she completed a rapid Covid test on R1 and it was negative. V4 said she called the doctor and received orders for Claritin and Flonase. R1's 1/1/2024 progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reorder medications for residents to prevent missing doses of scheduled medications. The facility also failed to have two licensed professionals sign off the shift-to-shift controlled substance sheet and have two licensed professionals sign off on wasted controlled substances. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3, R16, R17) reviewed for pharmacy services. The findings include: 1. On 12/20/23 at 02:26 PM, V20 (Family Member) said R3 missed three doses of the medication because they had run out of the Vimpat. R3's face sheet showed R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including epilepsy, cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and peripheral vascular disease. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/7/23 showed R3 was moderately impaired. R3 required set up assistance with eating, supervision for oral hygiene, moderate assistance for toileting hygiene, upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures for a resident during incontinence care, and residents under COVID-19 isolation. This applies to 5 of 7 residents (R11, R12, R15, R13, R14) reviewed for infection control. The findings include: 1. On 12/21/23 at 09:07 AM, V11 (CNA) provided incontinence care for R11. V11 removed R11's dirty brief and wiped R11's urine and stool. V11 did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene. V11 then grabbed R11's clean incontinence brief and incontinence pad and placed it under R11. V11 applied barrier cream using the same gloves. V11 secured the incontinence brief and placed the clean incontinence pad under the resident. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R11 was admitted with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, encephalopathy, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to a resident for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for ADLs. The findings include: On 12/21/23 at 08:37 AM, V14 (Family Member) told V16 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) she wanted R11 up and out of bed because it was not good for him to be laying down since he had pneumonia. At 08:41 AM, V14 said the staff do not come check on her husband often enough and he was waiting to get cleaned up. V14 said R11 was not able to move too much because of his weakness, and he also had COVID-19 and pneumonia. On 12/21/23 at 09:07 AM, V11 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) went into R11's room to provide incontinence care. R11 was laying on his back. When V11 removed R11's incontinence brief, there was urine and stool in the brief. R11's skin around his perineal area was excoriated and red. When V11 rolled R11 to the side to provide pericare, R11's buttocks and sacrum were excoriated and between shades of red and purple. When V11 was wiping R11, R11 began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe and administer a hospital discharge order for Quetiapine Fumarate for a resident. The facility also failed to ensure a resident had her narcotic available to prevent a resident from experiencing pain. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The findings include: 1. On 11/9/23 at 12:15 PM, V3 (Family Member) said R1 was hospitalized and discharged back to the facility on [DATE]. V3 said she had reviewed the discharge paperwork from the hospital with V2 (DON) on 10/20/23 and was assured the order for Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg (Milligrams) was on the discharge paperwork from the hospital. V3 said R1 was hospitalized again at the beginning of November, and she found out from the hospital staff that R1 did not have orders for Quetiapine Fumarate in the transfer paperwork from the facility. V3 said she called the facility and asked the staff about R1's Quetiapine Fumarate, to which they said there were no orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet were served a full serving of pureed pork and a dinner roll at the noon meal. The facility also failed to ensure residents were served the full serving of vegetables. This applies to 7 of 29 residents (R35, R43, R79, R133, R85, R99 & R22) reviewed for following menus in the sample of 29. The findings include: The facility's Spring/Summer Regular Menu 2023 for Monday August 28, 2023 shows, marinated pork loin, mashed potatoes, zucchini & tomatoes, dinner roll or bread, margarine, pineapple tidbits, beverage of choice. 1. On August 28, 2023 at the noon meal, V14 Dietary Aide and V13 Food Service Director (FSD) were serving the residents the noon meal on the second floor. They served the puree pork using a beige # 10 scoop size (3 ounces). The puree residents (R35, R43, R79 & R133) did not receive a roll or any type of bread. They only received pureed pork, pureed vegetable, mashed potatoes and pureed soup. The facility's resident's with a pureed diet texture list provided on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to feed a resident in a dignified manner. This applies to 1 of 29 residents (R79) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 29. The findings include: On August 28, 2023 at 12:24 PM, V3 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was feeding R79 the noon meal. R79 was sitting in a reclining wheelchair. V3 was standing next to R79 feeding her the meal. On August 30, 2023 at 10:29 AM, V8 Nurse Consultant stated, CNA's should not be standing to feed residents. The Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for people in Long-Term Care Facilities (no date) shows, Your rights to dignity and respect: Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the use of a brace to treat a fractured wrist for 1 of 29 residents (R16) reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 29. The findings include. R16's face sheet showed R16 had a closed displaced transverse fracture of the right radius and dementia. R16's Progress Note dated 8/17/23 showed R16 was seen by a hand surgeon for a fractured right wrist. The note indicated the fracture was going to be treated non-operatively with a brace. R16's Doctor Note dated 8/14/23 showed R16 had a distal radius fracture. R16 was to wear a brace at night and during the day for the fracture. The brace was to be removed for hygiene purpose and to work on gentle range of motion. R16's Order Summary Report showed an order for the brace to be on night and day. The brace could be removed for hygiene purpose and to work on gentle range of motion. On 8/28/23 at 10:00 AM, R16 was in her room sitting on the edge of her bed. R16 did not have the brace on her wrist. The brace was sitting on R16's bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R30 was provided with fingernail care for 1 of 29 residents (R30) reviewed for Activity's of Daily Living in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 08/28/23 at 1:57 PM, R30's fingernails on the right and left hand extended past the tips of his fingers. There was a dark substance under R30's nails. On 08/28/23 at 1:57PM, R30 said, I do not recall having my fingernails cut at the facility. I have made requests.multiple requests to have my fingernails trimmed. As a [NAME] Belt in Judo, I have always maintained good grooming practices that include keeping my nails trimmed short. No one in the facility has ever assisted me in trimming my fingernails. On 08/29/23 at 1:06 PM, V10 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant said, nail care is provided as needed. R30 is alert. He can tell us when his nails need to be trimmed. R30's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, Personal Hygiene: Extensive assistance. R30's electronic medical record on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement R52's pressure reduction interventions for 1 of 5 residents (R52) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 08/29/23 at 10:40 AM, R52's right and left posterior heels were resting on the foam filled mattress. On 08/29/23 at 1:09 PM, V10 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant said, R52 should have heels elevated, he spends most of his time in bed. On 08/29/23 at 1:18 PM, V12 Wound Care Nurse said, R52 is a high risk for pressure ulcer development. Heel elevation is to prevent pressure ulcer development. Elevating the heels off the bed helps to off load pressure. R52 does not have independent mobility in bed. R52's Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale dated 08/03/23 shows, high risk for pressure injury. R52's current Care Plan on 08/29/23 shows, R52 has potential for alteration in skin integrity. Goal: R52's Skin will remain intact through next review. Interventions: Elevate heels off bed. The facility's Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injury and Other Skin Alterations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication was safely disposed of to prevent a resident from accessing the disposed medication. This applies to 1 of 29 residents (R118) reviewed for safety in the sample of 29. The findings include: R118's face sheet showed R118 had the diagnoses of restlessness, delusional disorders, dementia, and Alzheimer's. On 08/28/23 at 09:52 AM, R118 was in bed. Sitting on R118's bedside table was a cup of water. The cup was filled 1/3 of the way with water. Submerged in the water was a pill. The pill was red, transparent, and oval shaped. No staff were present in R118's room. R118 said she did not know what the pill was, where it came from, or if the pill was for her. On 08/28/23 at 10:14 AM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse- LPN) said R118 was not assessed to self administer medications. V6 said the cup and pill were disposed of in the garbage can in R118's room. According to V6, R118 removed the cup with the pill from the garbage can. V6 said R118 has a history of taking things out of the garbage. V6 said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with chronic pain was provided ordered pain medication. This applies to 1 of 29 (R110) reviewed for pain in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 8/28/2023 at 12:38AM, R110 said she has generalized abdominal and stoma pain rating her pain 8 out of 10. R110 said she hasn't had her Dilaudid (Hydromorphone) pain medication for a few days. R110 said she has been receiving Tylenol but it does not work as well Dilaudid. R110 said she is upset about not having her Dilaudid. On 8/29/2023 at 1:20PM, V4 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said R110 has an order for Dilaudid. V4 said the Dilaudid is not currently in stock. V4 said R110 last received Dilaudid on 8/22/2023. On 8/30/2023 at 9:40AM, R110 said she still had not received her Dilaudid for pain control. On 8/30/2023 at 10:58AM, V4 said R110 received Tylenol for pain this morning. V4 said R110's Dilaudid had not shown up to the facility from the pharmacy. V4 said R110 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviewed the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medication was available. This applies to 1 of 29 (R110) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 29. The findings include: On 8/28/2023 at 12:38AM, R110 said she has generalized abdominal and stoma pain rating her pain 8 out of 10. R110 said she hasn't had her Dilaudid (Hydromorphone) pain medication for a few days. R110 said the facility has issues with ordering her pain medication on time and she has gone without her ordered pain medication. R110 said she has been receiving Tylenol but it does not work as well Dilaudid. R110 said she is upset about not having her Dilaudid. On 8/30/2023 at 9:40AM, R110 said she still had not received her Dilaudid for pain control. R110 said she was told by facility staff pain medication would be available yesterday. R110 said the facility keeps blaming the pharmacy for the error. On 8/29/2023 at 1:49PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said pain medication should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents understood the arbitration agreement. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R22 and R134) reviewed for arbitration agreements in the sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R22's face sheet shows, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R22's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, he is cognitively intact. R22's Arbitration Agreement dated April 18, 2023 shows, R22 signed the document as well as V15 Admissions Director. On August 30, 2023 at 11:06 AM, R22 stated, he didn't remember signing the arbitration agreement. He didn't remember them going over what it was. He didn't even know what it was. He stated, if they had gone over it with him, he would have not signed it. 2. R134's face sheet shows, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R134's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, he is cognitively intact. R134's Arbitration Agreement dated May 9, 2023 shows, R134 signed the document as well as V15 Admissions Director. On August 30, 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R66, R35, R392) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R66's face sheet shows, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she is [AGE] years old. R66's immunization report shows, she received a pneumovax on September 25, 2020. The report does not show which pneumovax she received just that she received one. The same report also shows, Prevnar 13 as not eligible and Prevnar 23 (hx (history)) with a date of October 2, 2019. 2. R35's face sheet shows, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she is [AGE] years old. R35's face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: chronic kidney disease and type II diabetes mellitus. R35's immunization report shows, Pneumovax 23 (hx) with October 23, 2013 and June 21, 2018 dates. There is no other documentation of another pneumococcal vaccine given. 3. R392's face sheet shows, he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 31 opportunities with 4 errors resulting in a 12.9% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R2,R6) observed in the medication pass. 1) R2's electronic face sheet printed on 8/24/23 showed R2 has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease stage 2, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and long term use of anticoagulants. R2's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2023 showed R2 is to receive Flecainide Acetate 100mg and Apixaban 5mg every 12 hours at 9:00AM and 9:00PM. On 8/24/23 at 10:32AM, V4 (Registered Nurse) administered R2's Flecainide Acetate and Apixaban. (1 hour and 32 minutes past the scheduled administration time). On 8/24/23 at 10:37AM, V4 stated medications are considered late and a medication error if given over an hour beyond the scheduled administration time. V4 stated her medication pass for the morning is very heavy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received their medications at the ordered time for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R5, R7 and R8) observed during the medication pass. There were 29 opportunities with 13 errors resulting in a 44.82% error rate. The findings include: 1. R7's August Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows orders for acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg), 2 tablets by mouth every 12 hours for pain management scheduled at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM and lorazepam, 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day related to anxiety scheduled at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. On 8/17/23 at 11:55 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R7 her 9:00 AM dose of acetaminophen and lorazepam. 2. R8's August MAR shows orders for baclofen 10 mg two times a day for muscle spasms scheduled at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM, fluticasone propionate nasal spray twice a day for allergy symptoms scheduled at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM, metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg two times a day for hypertension scheduled for 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM and sodium chloride 2 grams twice a day for cardio…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an alleged allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11. The findings include: R3's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, atrial flutter, cardiomyopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and neuropathy. R3's Initial Nursing assessment dated [DATE] shows she's alert to person, time and place, clear speech, and has weakness to both lower extremities. On 8/17/23 at 11:06 AM, R3 said she needs help moving her legs and has pinching sensations on her feet. Two nights ago (8/15/23) an African American male put his lips on me. He was trying to massage my legs and rubbing my forehead with his hands and kissing my forehead. I reported this to V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) on 8/16/23. I wanted to call 911 but did not have my phone with me.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation after an alleged allegation of abuse was reported. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11. The findings include: R3's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, atrial flutter, cardiomyopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and neuropathy. R3's Initial Nursing assessment dated [DATE] shows she's alert to person, time and place, clear speech, and has weakness to both lower extremities. On 8/17/23 at 11:06 AM, R3 said she needs help moving her legs and has pinching sensations on her feet. Two nights ago (8/15/23) an African American male put his lips on me. He was trying to massage my legs and then rubbing my forehead with his hands and kissing my forehead. I reported this to V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) yesterday (8/16/23). She wanted to call 911 but did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 11. The findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows that his cognition is impaired. R1's current Care Plan shows, noted to resist care this is related to poor motivation. Interventions: Notify MD and family of medical noncompliance. R1's August Medication Administration Record shows that he refused his ordered ipratropium-albuterol nebulizer on 8/9/23 at 12:00 AM and 4:00 AM and on 8/18/23 at 8:00 PM, refused to apply his CPAP (Sleep apnea machine) on 8/20/23, refused his ordered guaifenesin on 8/17/23 at 11:00 AM and refused his sodium chloride nebulizer on 8/18/23 at 9:00 PM. R1's Progress Notes from 8/9, 8/17, 8/18 and 8/20/23 were reviewed. There was no documentation noted that R1's physician and family were notified of R1's refusals. There was notation on 8/17/23 that R1 spit out out his guaifenesin but no notation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who requires extensive assist received bathing and dressing assistance for 1 of 8 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 11. The findings include: On 8/17/23 at 10:09 AM, R2 was lying in bed with a soiled gown. There was multiple dried food debris spots on her gown. Her long hair was slicked back and stringy. She said her gown has not been changed in two weeks and she does not receive her showers very often. My shower days are supposed to be on Monday and Friday and have not been getting them. I need staff assistance for showers and dressing. On 8/17/23 at 12:34 PM, V12 (LPN) said R2 is alert and oriented and needs assistance with bathing and dressing. She can not do that on her own. On 8/17/23 at 12:25 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said showers should be given twice a week. R2's face sheets shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnosis including Elhers-Danlos syndrome,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received their ordered medication and failed to ensure medications were accurately documented for 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 11. The findings include: 1. R1's August Medication Administration Record shows an order for vancomycin 1.25 grams intravenously every 12 hours for pneumonia to be administered at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, sodium chloride nebulization solution 3% four times a day for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM, 5:00 PM and 9:00 PM and an order for ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution every 4 hours for hypertensive heart disease to be administered at 12:00 AM, 4:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM. On 8/17/23 at 10:30 AM, R1 was sitting in his wheelchair at the nurses station. At 12:30 PM, R1 was in the dining room waiting for lunch. R1 appeared short of breath, was breathing loudly and was coughing. R1 was served lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for medications in the sample of 11. The findings include: R2's face sheets shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnosis including Elhers-Danlos syndrome, chronic pain, hypertension, spondylosis, and long term use of anticoagulants. R2's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows she's cognitively intact and has no rejection of cares. On 8/17/23 at 10:09 AM, R2 said she's supposed to get her blood thinner (Lovenox) twice a day and has not been receiving it as she should. She reported this to V2 (Director of Nursing) and her response was I highly doubt that. R2 said nothing was done. R2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 shows orders for Enoxaparin Sodium Injection (anticoagulant) inject 70 mg (milligrams) subcutaneously every 4 hours for DVT prophylaxis related to Elhers-Danlos syndrome. R2's MAR shows 7 out of 41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received laboratory services as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for laboratory services in the sample of 11. The findings include: R1's Care Plan shows diagnoses to include: diabetes mellitus, heart failure, anemia, hypertensive heart disease, malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, dementia, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, sepsis due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus auresus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1's Physician's Order Sheet shows an order dated 8/13/23 for a vancomycin trough, CBC (complete blood count) and CMP (complete metabolic panel) to start on 8/14/23. R1's order details report shows that the order was created on 8/13/23 at 7:04 PM by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R1's electronic medical record shows that R1 did not receive a blood draw for the vancomycin trough, CBC or CMP until 8/15/23 at 12:21 PM. On 8/21/23 at 3:48 PM, V10 (Nurse Practitioner) said that V1 (Administrator) had called her on Sunday (8/13) to let her know that R1 did not receive his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented when toileting a resident for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 11. The findings include: R1's Physician's Order Sheet shows an active active order for EBP due to having an indwelling urinary catheter. R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows that he requires extensive assistance with transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. R1's room had a sign on the door showing that he is on EBP and providers and staff must: Wear gloves and gown for the following high-contact resident care activities: transferring, providing hygiene, changing brief or assisting with toileting. On 8/17/23 at 10:30 AM, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) brought R1 to the bathroom and assisted him with toileting. On 8/17/23 at 1:05 PM, V17 brought R1 to the bathroom and assisted him with toileting. V17 then brought R1 into his room and assisted him to get to bed. V17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy by not ensuring staff wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) in resident areas. This has the potential to effect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 672 dated 9/13/22 shows 133 residents reside in the facility. On 9/13/22 at 11:17 AM, V15 (Certified Nurse Aide) was walking in the hall on the [NAME] unit while wearing an N95 mask. Both straps were wrapped around her head and below her ears. V16 (Activity Aide) was in the dining/lounge room on the [NAME] unit and was wearing an N95 mask with both straps below her ears. V16 was also wearing her eye goggles on top of her head. V16 was standing over and assisting multiple residents while the goggles were on top of her head. V16 was continually observed for 10 minutes with the goggles remaining on top of her head. At 12:09 PM, V16 was still wearing the goggles on top of her head. At 1:43 PM, V15 and V16 were both wearing the N95 masks with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident at high risk for falls, failed to modify fall prevention interventions after a fall, and failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner for two of two residents (R329, R112) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R329's face sheet showed an [AGE] year old female with diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, urinary tract infection, dysphagia, aphasia, gastrostomy, and multiple unstageable pressure injuries. On 9/15/22 at 12:15 PM, R329 was seen laying halfway down in her bed. Her right arm was contracted at the elbow. R329 could not communicate or answer with a nod appropriately to questions. R329 had good eye contact during interactions but could not participate. On 09/15/22 at 09:17 AM, V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said R329 is nonverbal and frustrated. She cannot communicate, gets antsy and frustrated all the time. It's hard to keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was performed in a manner to prevent cross contamination, failed to keep a urinary drainage bag below the bladder, and failed to ensure catheter tubing was secure for three of six residents (R121, R329, R112) reviewed for catheters in a sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R121's face sheet printed on 9/14/22 shows diagnoses including but not limited to obstructive uropathy, chronic kidney disease, and heart disease. R121's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows moderate cognitive impairment and requires extensive staff assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene. The same assessment shows R121 uses a urinary catheter and is frequently incontinent of bowel. R121's care plan shows a focus area start dated 8/22/22 related to urinary tract infections. R121's September 2022 physician order report shows an order dated 9/5/22 for an indwelling urinary catheter due to retention. The same report shows orders dated 9/5/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary recommendations were implemented for a resident with significant weight loss for one of three residents (R121) reviewed for weight in the sample of 26. The findings include: R121's face sheet printed on 9/14/22 shows diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and uropathy. R121's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows moderate cognitive impairment and requires staff assistance with eating. R121's face sheet shows an original admission date of 5/25/22 and a readmission date of 9/5/22. Progress notes show R121 was at the hospital 9/2 to 9/5 for syncope and collapse. R121's September 2022 physician order report showed orders dated 9/5/22 for regular texture diet with no added salt or concentrated sweets. The report showed orders dated 9/5/22 for: Monthly weight and record. There were no current orders for a nutritional supplement. On 9/13/22 at 1:51 PM, R121 way…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to pause a tube feeding while repositioning a resident at risk for aspiration. This applies to one of three residents (R105) in the sample of 26 reviewed for feeding tubes. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R105 shows diagnoses to include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dysphagia. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R105 to be cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility. On 9/13/2022 at 10:15 AM, V3 Director of Nursing (DON) and V17 wound care technician were observed repositioning R105. R105's tube feeding was infusing by pump into R 105's gastrostomy tube as V3 and V17 laid the head of the bed flat. On 9/15/22 at 10:33 AM, V19 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said when R105 is going to have the head of his bed lowered the tube feeding should be paused to prevent aspiration. On 9/15/22 at 10:49 AM, V3 DON said a tube feeding needs to be put on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the IV (intravenous) central line dressing was clean, dry, and intact for 1 of 1 resident (R93) reviewed for central line dressings in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R93's face sheet showed his initial admission to the facility was on 08/09/22 with diagnoses to include acute osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy unspecified, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue unspecified. R93's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he has no cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status Score 13), requires limited assistance of one staff for transfer and locomotion, and he is on IV medications. R93's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows an order for 'Transparent dressing - site visible (peripheral) Q72H (every 72 hours) with site change & PRN (as needed); midline, midclavicular and CVAD (central…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess effectiveness of pain medication in 1 of 3 residents (R327) reviewed for pain in the sample 26. The findings include: 1. R327's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis, covid-19, chronic diastolic heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and spondylopathy lumbar region. R327's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows Acetaminophen 325 mg, give 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain management. R327's Care Plan shows that R327 has 'Alteration in comfort . with a goal of 'indicators of discomfort . eliminated or decreased' and intervention of ' . observe resident for effectiveness of pain relief'. On 9/13/22 at 11:10 AM, observed R327 sitting up on bed eating her breakfast. R327 stated that she has pain at 10/10. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) for September 2022 shows that R327 received Acetaminophen 325 mg, 2 tablets, by mouth at on 9/12/22 at 01:26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,256 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,256 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE ALDEN GROUP, LTD. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/18/1978 |
| AUDRA ELISCO GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2018 |
| LAUREN MAGNUSSON GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/28/2018 |
| RANDI SCHULLO GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/28/2018 |
| THE FLOYD A. SCHLOSSBERG LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| ELISCO, ARIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| ELISCO, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| MAGNUSSON, GARRETT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| MAGNUSSON, PAIGE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, NICOLE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, RANDI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/16/2010 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| DAVIS, ESTHER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/15/2010 |
| PERKOVIC, VALERIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/12/2021 |
| CARL, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/18/1978 |
| SCHLOSSBERG, FLOYD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/18/1978 |
| ALDEN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/18/1977 |
| MOLITOR, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/16/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145582. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.