No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Alden Terrace Of McHenry Rehab

803 Royal Drive, McHenry, IL 60050 · For profit - Corporation · 316 certified beds · (815) 344-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$11,170 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $11,170 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4318 W Crystal Lake Rd · (815) 344-1500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4222 W Elm St · (815) 385-7030 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4605 W Elm St · (815) 578-1850 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1204 Manchester Mall · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4724 W Crystal Lake Rd · (847) 201-2777

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.2%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.7%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.2%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.2%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine49.3%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.212.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.782.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.1%CMS range 33.5–55.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.8–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified31.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting23.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.8–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
49.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 316 beds and averages 164.0 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 152 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise residents on the dementia unit while an exit door was alarming and unlocked. This failure resulted in R1 exiting the building, being picked up by a stranger, and driven away from the facility. This failure has the potential to affect the 17 residents who reside on the dementia unit with wandering or exit seeking behaviors. This past compliance occurred from 10/7/23 to 10/7/23. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/7/23 at approximately 9:15 AM when R1 exited the facility unsupervised through an alarmed, unlocked door to the dementia unit. R1 was later found by a stranger and driven 1-1 1/2 miles from the facility. When the stranger realized R1 was confused, they notified the police and R1 was returned to the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 10/13/23. V1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/13/23. The findings include: The facility face sheet showed R1 to have diagnoses to include unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a discrepancy with a resident's psychotropic medication was reconciled with a physician upon re-admission after a hospitalization for hypertension for 1 of 31 residents (R137) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 50. This failure resulted in R137 not receiving depakote, which was previously prescribed for aggressive behaviors, to display aggressive behaviors towards another resident and subsequently be sent out to the hospital for an evaluation. The findings include: R137's Face Sheet shows that he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: depression, anxiety, history of traumatic brain injury and history of suicidal behavior. R137's Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner Note dated 10/9/24 shows, Nursing and staff report moods labile with sarcastic passive aggressive comments at times .He endorses a history of becoming angry and threatening people, states you don't want to piss me off; admits to recent feelings of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. The findings include:R1's Behavior Note dated 5/27/26 at 7:20 PM shows, Resident was observed by staff hitting another resident with a hair brush.R2's Post Occurrence Note dated 5/27/26 shows, Resident stated he and the other resident got into an argument and the other resident hit him on the head and shoulder with a hair brush.On 6/3/26 at 9:45 AM, R2 said that about a week ago, he was hit by another resident (R1). R2 said that he was sitting in his wheel chair by the nurses station when he saw R1 walk down the hallway and enter his room. R2 said that he immediately went down the hall to see why R1 was in his room but R1 was not in his room, he was in the room next to his looking in the drawer. R2 said that he then parked his wheelchair in the middle of the doorway and asked R1, What are you stealing now?. R2 said R1 got upset and started coming towards him and yelling at him. R2 said then staff immediately came to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of six.The findings include:R3's Face Sheet dated May 11, 2026, shows R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, lymphedema, history of falling, major depressive disorder, and overactive bladder.R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], shows R3 is not cognitively intact. R3 is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R3's Care Plan shows R3 has an activity of daily living (ADL) functional performance deficit due to Alzheimer's, asthma, obesity, and anxiety disorder. Assist with ADL tasks as needed. Peri care after incontinent episodes.On May 11, 2026, R3 was observed in the units dining room in the same wheeled recliner multiple times from 9:22 AM-1:05 PM. At 1:05 PM, R3 said she had been in the chair for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when it was left unattended. This failure applies to residents with medications in the 500 hallway medication cart. The findings include:The facility provided list of residents whose medications were stored in the 500 hall cart showed 15 residents medications were contained in the cart. On 4/15/26 8:10 AM, the 500 hallway medication cart was near two doors in the 500 hall. The lock for the cart was extended outwards indicating the cart was not locked. The drawers were opened, and medications were in the cart. There were no staff monitoring the cart. The 500 hall nurse, V6 (Registered Nurse), then exited a resident's room. The medication cart was not visible from that resident's room. V6 then locked the cart. On 4/16/26 at 10:22 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated medication carts should be locked when staff leave the cart unattended. V2 stated this is to protect medications and protect residents. The facility's Medication Storage (dated 9/2020) policy does not state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow a Physician order to apply compression wraps for R94 and failed to document a change in a resident's condition when sent to the emergency room for R150. This applies to two of two residents (R94, R150) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 49.The findings include:1. On 4/14/26 at 10:30 AM, V9, (R94's wife), was observed telling the nurse that her husband's compression hose had not been applied and the staff needed to do better. R94 was observed in bed without any compression wraps to his legs. Both of R94's lower legs were observed to be swollen. V9 said her husband's legs are to be wrapped every morning and this was not being completed for him daily as ordered. The facility face sheet for R94 shows he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure and lymphedema. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R94 to have severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for his care. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with appointments for vision care in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (R88) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 49.The findings include:On 4/14/2026 at 10:37 AM, R88 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room and stated he needed an appointment for his cataract in his right eye. R88 stated he couldn't see out of it and now his left eye is almost gone. R88 stated soon he would be blind. R88 stated he has needed the appointment for his cataracts for months. R88 stated they said they were waiting for a referral. R88 stated he wanted to know what was going on.On 4/15/2026 at 2:31 PM, V18 (Social Services) stated appointments are made by the nurses and transportation is arranged by the receptionist. V18 stated R88 mentioned to her a concern about his eyes and she told the (Assistant Director of Nurses-ADON).On 4/15/2026 at 2:44 PM, V15 (ADON) stated it was brought to her attention a little over a week ago that R88 needed an appointment for his cataracts with ophthalmology. V15 stated she was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to trim the toenails of a resident. This applies to one of one resident (R33) in the sample of 49 reviewed for nail care.The findings include:The facility face sheet for R33 shows he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis to include peripheral vascular disease and mild cognitive impairment. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R33 to have mild cognitive impairment and requires partial assistance with putting on footwear.On 4/14/26 at 10:15 AM, R33 said, My toenails are so long they have put holes in my slippers. R33 was wearing slippers, and a hole was observed above the great toe on both of his slippers. R33 removed his slippers, and his toes nails were observed to be long, thick and discolored. On 4/15/26 at 2:57 PM, V5 (Memory Care Director) said any staff can add a resident to the podiatry list if there is a concern about a resident's toenails.On 4/16/26 at 9:39 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said resident toenails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of falls had new interventions in place for 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 49. The findings include:R1's face sheet printed on 4/16/26 showed diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, bipolar disorder, and artificial knee joint. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed no cognitive impairment. The same assessment showed partial/moderate staff assistance with transfers. The assessment showed substantial/maximal assistance for dressing and toilet hygiene. R1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] showed at risk for falls. On 4/15/26 at 11:20 AM, R1 was seated in a wheelchair alone in his room. R1 said, I have a lot of medical issues and need help from the staff. I fell a couple of times since I got here. I have no patience to wait for the aides to come help me. I would wet my pants if I waited for one of them to finally show up.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep catheter tubing off the floor, the drainage bag below the level of the bladder and the drainage bag covered for 2 of 5 residents (R127 & R171) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 49.The findings include: 1. On 4/14/26 at 10:58 AM, R127 was sitting in his wheelchair in dining room at table with clothing protector on. R127's catheter tubing was on floor with cloudy yellow urine in the tubing. On 4/14/26 at 1:15 PM, R127 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. The catheter tubing was on the floor under his chair. V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) and V13 (CNA) had gown and gloves on and turned R127's chair around with his catheter tubing dragging under his chair. V13 took the catheter bag from the dignity bag and handed it through to V12 who put in dignity bag on lower side of bed. V12 applied the gait belt around R127 and V12 and V13 did a two person stand-pivot transfer to his bed. They turned R127 from side to side in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to stop an infusion of tube feeding when it was leaking at the insertion site for 1 of 3 residents (R36) reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 49.The findings include:On 4/15/2026 at 11:20 AM, R36 was sitting up in his chair with tube feeding infusing at 55 milliliters (ml) per hour. The front of his shirt was wet in the lower middle of his abdomen. R36 stated his feeding tube was no good and it was not working. R36 stated he had a new feeding tube put in yesterday. At 11:23 AM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) stated she thinks there was something wrong with the tube feeding site and he needed his dressing and shirt changed. V14 then walked away stating she needed to talk to her (Director of Nursing-DON). At 11:29 AM, V14 came back onto the floor and stated the DON placed a call to the doctor and was waiting for the gastroenterologist to call back. V14 stated the tube feeding wasn't leaking from the tube but from the sight. V14 stated the tube feeding was still infusing at 50 ml per hour and he has water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer insulin in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R125) reviewed for insulin administration in the sample of 49. The findings include:R125's Face Sheet showed a diagnosis of diabetes type 2. R125's April 2026 Medication Administration Record showed a current order, as of 4/15/26, for rapid-acting insulin to be given at a dosage which is dependent upon R125's blood sugar value (sliding scale insulin). This sliding scale insulin is done before each meal. On 4/15/26 at 11:55 AM, V11 (Registered Nurse-RN) began preparing R125's sliding scale insulin. V11 removed R125's prefilled multi-dose insulin pen from the medication cart. V11 wiped the tip of the pen with an alcohol wipe, threaded on a new needle, dialed the pen to two units, held the pen horizontally, and punched the dose knob (plunger) with the palm of her hand then immediately released the plunger. R125's pen did have a small bubble within the insulin which remained in the pen following the priming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure gloves were changed when going from a dirty to a clean area to prevent cross contamination for 2 of 6 residents (R49 & R127) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 49.The findings include:1. On 4/14/26 at 1:02 PM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) and V13 (CNA) were at R49's bedside to provide incontinence care. V12 and V13 had gloves on. V12 was incontinent of urine and a small amount of bowel movement. V12 unfastened R49's incontinence brief and pulled the front down. V12 took disposable wipes and cleaned one side of his groin, discarded the wipe and did the same procedure to the other side of his groin. V12 took a wipe and cleaned under his penis and scrotum area. V12 had bowel movement under the scrotum towards his anus that she wiped off and discarded the wipe. V12 did not change her gloves. V12 tucked the mechanical lift sling under the resident and placed a clean incontinence brief under him. V12 assisted R49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 & R2) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 6. The findings include:On 4/4/26 at 9:31 AM, R1 stated, he was upset at V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). R1 stated that about a week ago, R1 was in the dining room and asked V4 to help a lady who is [AGE] years old who looked like she was pleading for help and can't speak English. V4 CNA refused to help him or the lady. R1 stated, he couldn't remember the resident's name but knows she lives on the 100 hall, is [AGE] years old, and speaks only Spanish. The facility's census showed a resident on the 100 hall that is [AGE] years old (R2). R1 confirmed that it was the resident, and he just needed to hear her name. He stated, V4 CNA is Spanish speaking as well and that is why he asked her to please help R2 because he couldn't understand what she was saying. V4 CNA told him 'no' and to ask the activity aide (V8) for help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's guardian of a change in resident status for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for notification in the sample of 4.The findings include:R1's Face sheet shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same Face sheet shows V5 is R1's Resident Representative State Guardian. R1's Nurses Note dated [DATE] at 1:54 AM shows, Resident expired, family and Hospice nurse present at bedside. On [DATE] at 3:54 AM the Nurses Notes show Resident's body picked up by funeral home. There is no further documentation in R1's progress notes regarding R1's death or that V5 was notified. On [DATE] at 10:41 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said when a resident expires the nurse notifies the physician, the resident's Power of Attorney and emergency contacts, and a guardian if the resident has one. V4 said if the resident were on hospice, they would need to be called also. V4 said the nurse on duty needs to chart in the progress notes the time of death…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.The findings include:A facility abuse investigation report dated 1/18/26 showed R2 was slapped in the face by R1 after R1 and R2 had a verbal altercation. R2 sustained a minor bloody nose because of the incident. R1 and R2 were separated by staff. R1 was sent to a local hospital for an evaluation. R1 was moved to a different unit, separate from R2, upon R1's return to the facility. The report showed both R1 and R2 had a diagnosis of dementia. R1's current care plan showed R1 was mildly cognitively impaired. R1 had a history of being verbally and physically abusive towards peers and staff. A progress note dated 5/16/25 showed R1 struck another resident with a television remote. A progress note dated 11/23/25 showed R1 pushed a CNA (certified nursing assistant). R2's current care plan showed R2 was severely cognitively impaired. On 1/26/26 at 9:00 AM, R1 stated he remembered the incident on 1/18/26 involving R2. R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R1 has a BIMS of 15-no cognitive impairment.The same assessment show R1 has no behavior of making false statements.R1's care plan (undated) documents R1 is at risk for falls due to diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS) with left sided weakness.R1 requires the use of mechanical lift for transfers, with intervention of: provide 2 staff assistance for transferring. On 12/18/25 at 9AM, R1 said the agency Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA came to the room last night and said it was time for your shower. R1 said he reminded V7 (CNA) that he needed another staff to help. V7 insisted he can do it himself. V7 said when he was strapped in the mechanical lift, and V7 was placing him in the shower chair, the shower chair moved, the shower chair tipped over with R1, both ending on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of a resident's change in condition to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification in the sample of 7.The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet under contacts documents V9 (R1's daughter) was: Resident Representative, emergency contact #1, care conference person, customer care representative V9's information included V9's address and phone number. On 9/26/25 at 10:10 AM, R1 was in bed with oxygen on at 2L via nasal cannula alert and able to verbalize her needs. R1 said she wanted her daughter to be informed of whatever was going on with her. R1 said she was hoping she will be able to speak to her soon, my daughter is the love of my life. R1's physician order sheet dated 8/17/25 documents Azithromycin Tablet 250 MG, give 2 tablets by mouth one time only for pneumonia, then Give 1 tablet by mouth in the afternoon for pneumonia for 4 Days.R1's medical record as confirmed with V2 (Director of Nursing) did not show that V9 R1's daughter and representative was informed of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for a resident that left the facility without supervision and staff knowledge for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 9.The findings include:Findings include:R1's Face sheet dated 8/16/25 showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, iron deficiency anemia, alcohol dependence, mood (affective) disorder, and hypertension.R1's Physician Order Sheet showed he was allowed to go out on a community pass alone.R1's Elopement Risk Assessment completed 7/17/25 showed he was not at risk for elopement.R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he was cognitively intact and was independent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).On 8/16/25 at 10:55 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse) said she was taking care of another resident when the door alarm went off. V7 said she immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents with coffee between meals per resident preferences. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R31, R5, R110, R111) reviewed for choices in the sample of 50. The findings include: On 3/24/25 at 10:40 AM, R110 said a group of residents on the 500/600 units have had concerns about receiving coffee between meals per their preference. R110 said himself, R31, R5, R111, and a few others would get to the dining room early before meals, sit around tables together and converse or play games while drinking coffee. R110 said for a few months, the kitchen stopped bringing coffee up until just before meal time, resulting in these residents no longer getting together before meals. On 3/24/25 at 1:58 PM, R111 corroborated the concerns brought up by R110 that coffee is not served between meals when requested. On 3/25/25 at 9:15 AM, R31 said when the facility stopped serving coffee between meals, R31's family bought and provided R31 with a single serving coffee maker for in R31's room. R31 said the facility notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nutrional supplements were provided as ordered for residents with a history of a significant weight loss and failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained on a newly admitted resident. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R18, R73, R140 and R148) reiviewed for nutrition in the sample of 50. The findings include: 1. R140's Face Sheet shows that she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R140's Weights and Vitals Summary printed on 3/25/25 shows that R140 weighed 100 pounds (lbs) on 2/10/25. The summary shows that R140's weights as follows: 2/11-100 lbs, 2/12-100 lbs, 2/18-100 lbs, 3/5-95 lbs and 3/12-95.5 lbs. No additional weight were recorded. No weights were recorded for the week of 2/24/25. R140's Registered Dietitian Note dated 3/11/25 shows, Weight is 95 lb (5% loss x 1 mo (month), undesired, . below weight for age po (oral) intake variable aware of her weight, weight loss, agreeable to fortified pudding bid (twice a day) .discussed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in a manner to prevent cross contamination for four of six residents (R60, R85, R27, R62) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 50. The findings include: 1. R60's admission Record dated March 24, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, vascular dementia, and history of falling. R60's Care Plan initiated June 8, 2019 shows she has an ADL self care performance deficit due to diagnoses of dementia. Interventions include assist with ADL care tasks as needed, assist with toileting needs as necessary. R60's Care Plan initiated August 23, 2019 shows R60 experiences frequent bladder incontinence due to diagnosis of dementia, check residents for incontinence. On March 24, 2025 at 10:17 AM, V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) went into R60's room to perform incontinence care to R60. R60 was laying in her bed. V9 folded R60 incontinence brief from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during personal care for two of two residents (R60, R85) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 50. The findings include: 1. R60's admission Record dated March 24, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, vascular dementia, and history of falling. On March 24, 2025 at 10:17 AM, V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided personal care for R60. R60 was laying on her back in her bed. R60 had two roommates. One of R60's roommates was sitting in her wheelchair facing R60's bed. The privacy curtain was half pulled. V9 performed incontinence care to R60 exposing R60's front peri area. R60's private areas were visible to R60's roommate and R60's roommate glanced over at V9 and R60 multiple times. On March 25, 2025 at 9:28 AM, V13 (R60's daughter/power of attorney) said, I would hope that they are keeping it private when they are changing [R60's] incontinence brief or cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse. This applies to 4 of 31 residents (R32, R92, R105, R80) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 50. The findings include: R32, R92, R105 & R80 all reside in a locked memory care unit. 1. R32's face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: dementia, delirium, mood disorder & unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. On March 24, 2025 at 11:05 AM, R32 was upset and yelling. I had a slice of cabbage for supper, it's bullsh*t, call the police! I want a walker and a decent meal! On March 25, 2025 at 10:04 AM, R32 was upset and yelling in the dining room. I want a cup of coffee and want the hell out of here now! I want these people out, this is my house! R32's progress notes dated January 19, 2025 shows, Overheard another resident telling R32 That isn't your coffee and this RN (Registered Nurse) observed her trying to take someone else's coffee and then hit his arm while I was on the way to intervene . The facility did not provide an abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow it's own abuse policy. This applies to 4 of 31 residents (R32, R92, R105, R80) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 50. The findings include: On December 22, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R105. On January 16, 2025, R105's progress notes show R105 had a physical altercation with R80. On January 19, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R92. The facility did not provide an abuse investigation, incident report or any other documentation regarding any of the incidents. On March 26, 2025 at 1:38 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, he didn't have any abuse investigations for the past four months. The facility's abuse policy dated September 2020 shows, Policy: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility will report reasonable suspicion of crime. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff identified and reported allegations of physical abuse to the administrator. This applies to 4 of 31 residents (R32, R92, R105 R80) reviewed for abuse reporting in the sample of 50. The findings include: On December 22, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R105. On January 16, 2025, R105's progress notes show R105 had a physical altercation with R80. On January 19, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R92. The facility did not provide an abuse investigation, incident report or any other documentation regarding any of the incidents. On March 26, 2025 at 12:44 PM, V4 Registered Nurse (RN) stated, she wasn't sure if she reported the incidents or not (December 22, 2024 and January 19, 2025). On March 26, 2025 at 1:18 PM, V18 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, she did report the incident to both V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing). On March 26, 2025 at 1:38 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, he did not have any abuse investigations for the past four months. Sometimes what they see and what they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate allegations of physical abuse. This applies to 4 of 31 residents (R32, R92, R105, R80) reviewed for abuse investgations in the sample of 50. The findings include: On December 22, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R105. On January 16, 2025, R105's progress notes show R105 had a physical altercation with R80. On January 19, 2025, R32's progress notes show R32 hit R92. The facility did not provide an abuse investigation, incident report or any other documentation regarding any of the incidents. On March 26, 2025 at 1:38 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, he did not have any abuse investigations for the past four months. Sometimes what they see and what they document isn't always the same. On March 27, 2025 at 10:22 AM, V1 (Administrator) clarified, the incidents were reported to him as behaviors and not as a physical exchange therefore he did not take them as abuse allegations.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for one of three residents (R60) that are dependent on staff for ADL care in the sample of 50. The findings include: R60's admission Record dated March 24, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, vascular dementia, and history of falling. R60's Care Plan initiated June 8, 2019 shows she has an ADL self care performance deficit due to diagnoses of dementia. Interventions include assist with ADL care tasks as needed, assist with toileting needs as necessary. R60's Care Plan initiated August 23, 2019 shows R60 experiences frequent bladder incontinence due to diagnosis of dementia, Check residents for incontinence. On March 24, 2025 at 10:17 AM, V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care to R60. V9 removed R60's incontinence brief. R60's incontinence brief was saturated with dark urine and had some stool in it. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatments, care, and services in accordance with professional standards for 3 of 31 residents (R91, R88, R62) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 50. The findings include: 1. On 3/25/25 at 8:57 AM, R91 said he had been having loose stools for approximately 9 days. On 3/26/25 at 11:02 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R91 had been seen by the physician the week prior and again on 3/26/25. On 3/26/25 at 10:52 AM, V22 (Registered Nurse/RN) said R91 has been having some loose stools and R91 received an order for loperamide (a medication to help with loose stools). R91's physician progress note dated 3/18/25 performed by V27 (Nurse Practitioner) states resident had complaints of diarrhea for a few days. V27 recommended to give R91 loperamide as needed for relief and to also hold R91's stool softener. R91's Order Summary Report dated 3/25/25 shows an order for Loperamide HCl (Hydrochloride) with a start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were in place for a resident at risk for pressure for 1 of 3 residents (R108) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 50. The findings include: On 3/24/25 at 9:48 AM, R108 was in bed with a pillow under her right side. R108's heels were flat on the bed. On 3/25/25 at 10:14 AM, V6 (Wound Nurse) said R108 has a stage 4 pressure injury to her sacrum that was first found on 1/10/24. V6 said R108 has pressure reducing interventions in place such as a low air loss mattress, dietary supplements, and frequent turning and repositioning. V6 said R108 does not have an order for padded heel boots. V6 said the facility follows orders for treatment and interventions from the Wound Doctor. On 3/25/25 at 12:30 PM, R108 was flat on her back in bed sleeping. R108's heels were flat on the mattress, not offloaded with pillows or heel boots. R108's Wound Doctor Progress Noted dated 3/18/25 shows R108 has a stage 4 pressure injury to her sacrum and shows Plan of Care- Avoid bony prominences…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation ,interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and implement interventions for a resident with a contracture for 1 of 1 residents (R42) reviewed for contractures in the sample of 50. The findings include: On 3/24/25 at 10:01 AM, R42 was in bed waiting for breakfast. R42's left hand was contracted with her fingers flat on the palm of her hand. R42 said her hand is contracted from a stroke. R42 used her right hand and was able to straiten her fingers out some (formed a C with her hand). R42 said they sometimes put a washcloth in her palm but only when she asks. V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) came in to answer R42's call light and said she was not aware of any splint or brace for R42's hand. On 3/25/25 at 12:30 PM, R42 was up in her wheelchair at the bedside waiting for lunch. R42's fingers on her left hand were contracted and flat on the palm of her hand. On 3/25/25 at 2:11 PM, V15 (Restorative Licensed Practical Nurse) said R42 was seen by therapy some time ago with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On March 24, 2025 at the noon meal, R105 was sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining room eating lunch. Her wheelchair did not have anti-tippers on it. On March 25, 2025 at 10:04 AM, R105 was sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining room doing activities. Her wheelchair did not have anti-tippers on it. R105's incident report dated January 22, 2025 shows, Resident was in the dining room. This writer and the other NOD (nurse on duty) suddenly heard a loud sound then found the resident on the floor holding the back of her head On March 25, 2025 at 1:34 PM, V21 (Registered Nurse) stated, she was the nurse working when R105 fell on January 22, 2025. R105 tipped her wheelchair backwards and hit her head on the floor. She is supposed to have anti-tippers on her wheelchair. She confirmed that R105's wheelchair did not have anti-tippers on it and should. R105's care plan (no date) shows, Focus: R105 is at risk for falls due to dx (diagnosis) of history of falls. Interventions: anti-tip to wheelchair . Based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an urinary drainage bag below the level of a resident's bladder for one of one resident (R85) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 50. The findings include: R85's admission Records dated March 25, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, urinary retention, and history of falling. R85's Care Plan intitiated on December 6, 2023 shows, [R85] requires the use of an indwelling catheter. Catheter care per orders and position the collection bag below the level of the bladder. On March 24, 2025 at 10:38 AM, R85 was in bed laying on her back. R85 had a urinary drainage device. There was amber colored urine in the tubing of R85's urinary drainage device. V9 CNA and V10 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistants) prepared R85 to get out of bed via mechanical lift. V9 lifted R85's urinary drainage bag above the level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and records review the facility failed to implement interventions to an excoriated gastrostomy tube (G-tube) for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for G-tubes in the sample of 50. The findings include: On 3/24/25 at 10:39 AM, R2 was in bed with a tube feeding pump connected to her G-tube. V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) lifted R2's gown to show this surveyor R2's G-tube site on her abdomen. R2 did not have a dressing around the entrance of the G-tube. There was noticeable red excoriation on R2's skin around the bottom of the G-tube extending out approximately 1.5 inches in width and 2.5 inches in length. V17 said she would let the nurse know about the redness. On 3/25/25 at 10:17 AM, V6 (Wound Nurse) said the nurse had him look at R2's G-tube site yesterday. V6 said R2 had some red excoriation around the site and he got an order for zinc oxide and a drain sponge dressing. V6 said he was not aware of any skin issues to R2's site prior to yesterday. On 3/25/25 at 1:54 PM, V16 Registered Nurse (RN) said is a skin issue is found the nurse makes a skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were ordered before running out resulting in a missed medication administration. This applies to 1 of 31 residents (R5) reviewed for medications in the sample of 50. The findings include: R5's Facesheet dated 3/26/25 shows R5 has diagnoses that include, but are not limited to, diabetes mellitus type two, systolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and cardiomyopathy. On 3/26/25 at 12:08 PM, R5 said R5 receives an expensive heart medication for R5's diagnoses of heart failure and heart disease. R5 said there were a few occasions that the facility did not have the medication on hand and R5 missed doses of the heart medication. R5's Order Summary Report dated 3/26/25 shows R5 receives Sacubitril-Valsartan for hypertensive heart disease with heart failure with a start date of 9/9/24. R5's December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows R5 did not receive the 9:00 PM dose for Sacubitril-Valsartan on 12/8/24. R5's Orders Note for eMAR (electronic MAR) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R30 and R97 received their medication on time for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 50. The findings include: The facility CMS-671 exit date 3/26/25 shows, a Medication Error Rate of 6.67 percent. On 03/24/25 at 10:01AM, V5 (Registered Nurse) was at the 400 Hall medication cart. Five residents were displayed on the EMAR-Electronic Medication Administration Record including R97 and R30 with a red background. V5 RN closed the computer and locked the medication cart. On 03/24/25 at 10:01 AM, V5 RN said, the medications are late. I will call the residents' doctors to let them know. On 03/24/25 at 10:07AM, V5 RN returned to the medication cart and said, the doctors gave me permission to pass the medications late. 1. R97's EMAR dated March 2025 shows, multiple diagnoses including psychosis, psychotic disturbances. On 03/24/25 at 10:07AM, V5 RN provided R97 with her 9:00AM, Physician Ordered medications: quetiapine 50mg (milligrams) by mouth, sertraline 50mg by mouth, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were served for 2 of 3 residents (R142, R91) reviewed for preferences in the sample of 50. The findings include: 1. On 03/24/25 at 10:54 AM, R142 was in his room sitting at the bedside. R142 said he has a tube feeding and he can eat, but they serve him puree and he doesn't want it. R142 said there are a few things that he likes to eat and he had told them but they rarely bring them. R142 said he likes soup and apple juice. On 03/24/25 at 12:20 PM in the 400 hall dining room dietary staff was filling resident meal trays. R142's dietary ticket showed puree, general, thin liquid. SEND EVERY MEAL PER PREFERENCE soup broth or creamy soup (such as tomato soup), apple juice, ice cream, pudding and oatmeal. Standing orders: 4 fluid ounce Apple Juice 3.25 fluid ounce Assorted Pudding- Any flavor 6 fluid ounce Chicken Broth 1/2 cup Ice Cream-any flavor. On 03/24/25 at 12:35 PM, R142's tray was delivered to his room. There was no soup, ice cream, pudding, or apple juice observed. R142 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, and odor free environment for 1 of 1 resident (R99) reviewed for safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment in the sample of 32 and 3 residents (R7, R97, R120) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1) On 5/14/24 at 10:19AM, R7's fitted bed sheet had 2 large yellow stains on it. R7's room had a strong urine odor present. On 5/15/24 at 9:37AM, R7's fitted bed sheets had the same 2 yellow stains and room odor that were present on 5/14/24. On 5/15/24 at 12:18PM, R7's fitted bed sheet had the same 2 yellow stains and additional brown stains present on them. R7's pillowcase had 2 brown stains on them that appeared to be from coffee. On 5/16/24 at 8:45AM, R7's fitted bed sheet and pillowcase had the same stains that were present on 5/14/24 and 5/15/24. R7 was not interviewable. 2) On 5/14/24 at 10:10AM, R97's fitted bed sheet had 2 large smears of brown and 1 large yellow stain. On 5/15/24 at 9:42AM, R97's fitted bed sheet had the same stains present as 5/14/24. On 5/16/24 at 8:48AM, R97's fitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a safe transfer for 1 resident (R74), failed to perform safe smoking assessments for 2 residents (R53, R125) and failed to intervene when a resident was tipping his wheelchair for 1 resident (R17). These failures apply to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1) R17's electronic face sheet printed on 5/16/24 showed R17 has diagnoses including but not limited to atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, anemia, polyneuropathy, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pacemaker, hypertension, and bradycardia. R17's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R17 has severe cognitive impairment. On 5/14/24 at 12:15PM, R17 was sitting at the dining table with both of his wheels locked on his wheelchair. R17 was pushing back from the table and tipping his wheelchair backwards. R17 was agitated and yelling at other residents at his table. Multiple facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's request for Advance Directives regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was accurately incorporated into the medical record for 1 of 1 resident (R28) reviewed for advance directives in the sample of 32. The findings include: R28's face sheet printed on [DATE] showed an admission date of [DATE]. On [DATE], R28's eMAR (electronic medical record) was reviewed. The computer banner screen showed the code status as full code and DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). R28's [DATE] physician order tab showed an order dated [DATE] for: Code status: Attempt resuscitation/CPR (full code) The same tab showed a second order dated [DATE] for: Code status: Do not attempt resuscitation (DNR). R28's POLST (Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) was dated [DATE] and showed No CPR: Do not attempt Resuscitation. R28's care plan showed a focus area related to code status. R28 was documented as a full code and wishes to remain a full code. On [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 1 resident (R99), and failed to provide meal set-up and transfer assistance for 1 resident (R335). These failures apply to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1) R99's electronic face sheet printed on 5/16/24 showed R99 has diagnoses including but not limited to dementia without behaviors, hypotension, muscle weakness, and wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra. R99's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R99 has severe cognitive impairment, requires substantial assistance for bathing, and has no behaviors of rejecting care. R99's nursing progress notes for April 2024 and May 2024 showed no documentation related to R9 refusing showers. R99's care plan dated 11/14/22 showed, (R99) has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit due to diagnosis of dementia, muscle weakness, hypertension, malnutrition, heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete dressing changes for (R53) and failed to have preventative measures in place for a resident (R74) with non-pressure wounds for 2 of 6 residents reviewed quality of care in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. On 5/15/24 at 10:20 AM, R53 was self-propelling his wheelchair in the hallway, near his room. R53 had a left above the knee amputation. R53 was wearing a black tennis shoe on his right foot with a gauze dressing noted extending from the shoe. The skin on R53's right ankle and lower shin was red and shiny. R53 said he had an infection in his leg and probably will have to have more toes cut off. R53 said he's been dealing with the wounds for a long time. R53 said the dressing to his right foot is only changed every couple of days. R53's Facesheet dated 5/16/24 showed diagnoses to include, but not limited to: amputation surgical aftercare, left above the knee amputation, PVD (peripheral vascular disease), Stage 3 CKD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's heels were offloaded for 1 of 7 residents (R30) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 32. The findings include: R30's admission Record, printed by the facility on 5/16/24, showed she had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to understand and express language, reading, and writing), anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition. R30's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she is dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, bed mobility, and personal hygiene. The assessment showed R30 had an unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury. R30's care plan initiated on 4/8/2021 showed she had a deep tissue injury to her right heel. The care plan showed R30 had a history of pressure injuries to her left heel and sacral area. On 5/16/24 at 9:43 AM, R30 was sitting in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag did not come in contact with the floor, failed to ensure the catheter bag was not above the level of the bladder, and failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag was emptied before urine backed up past the tubing. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R74, R92) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. R92's Face Sheet shows his diagnoses to include: stage 3 chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, nodular prostate with lower urinary tract symptoms, and retention of urine. On 5/14/24 at 12:00 PM, R92 was in bed with his urinary catheter bag hanging on the side of his bed. The catheter bag was full to the top but not yet into the tubing. On 05/15/24 at 1:19 PM, R92 said, the CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant) didn't dump the urine bag yesterday in time before it came all the way up the tube and backed up past the catheter. I pressed the call light because I felt bladder pressure, and finally a CNA dumped it. On 05/15/24 at 12:15 PM, R92 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to intervene for a resident experiencing behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 32. The findings include: R17's electronic face sheet printed on 5/16/24 showed R17 has diagnoses including but not limited to atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, anemia, polyneuropathy, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pacemaker, hypertension, and bradycardia. R17's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R17 has severe cognitive impairment and experiences physical and verbal behaviors. R17's nursing care plan dated 3/15/24 showed, Resident has the potential for/history of physical aggression towards others. Poor impulse control. Complete behavior tracking when behavior occurs. Observe resident behavior/interactions around other residents and monitor for aggressive behaviors. Remove resident from any potential situation which could precipitate aggressive behavior. On 5/14/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by not documenting a medication was given and not administering a medication at the scheduled time. There were 25 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in an 8% error rate. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R47) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: R47's face sheet printed on 5/16/24 showed diagnoses including but not limited to heart failure, diabetes mellitus, irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulosis, and hypertension. R47's May 2024 physician orders showed an order for one docusate sodium oral capsule 100 milligram to be given every 24 hours for bowel management. The order showed one losartan potassium oral tablet 50 milligrams to be given one time a day for hypertension. On 5/15/24 at 8:35 AM, V14 (RN-Registered Nurse) administered R47's scheduled 9 AM medications. V14 gave a total of 9 pills which included one docusate capsule. V14 did not dispense or give the losartan potassium tablet. At 11:21 AM, R47's medication administration report (MAR) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label and store medications according to their policy for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The findings include: On 5/15/24 at 9:53 AM, the 100-hall medication cart was reviewed with V20 (RN-Registered Nurse) present. The top drawer of the cart had three medication cups filled with pills. One cup held nine greenish-black tablets, one held four tan tablets, and one held four red capsules. All three cups were unlabeled. V20 said she guessed the pills were iron, a laxative, and multivitamins but was for sure. V20 stated she did not realize they were in the cart and was not sure where they came from. V20 said she had no idea who the pills belonged to or why they were not in the proper containers. V20 said there is the potential for administration mistakes, and they should not be in the cart without labeling. On 5/15/24 at 10:26 AM, the memory cart unit medication cart was reviewed with V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse) present. The top drawer of the cart had four prepackaged medications laying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a manner to prevent infection, failed to wash a resident's hands after they were contaminated during care, and failed to wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing direct care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 2 of 2 residents (R30, R22) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. R30's admission Record, printed by the facility on 5/16/24, showed she had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to understand and express language, reading, and writing), incontinence without sensory awareness, diaper dermatitis, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition. R30's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she is dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, bed mobility, and personal hygiene. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the prescribed treatment orders were implemented and changed daily for a resident with wound ulcers. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he is [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include cerebral infarction, anemia, rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor of left hand, unspecified dementia, unspecified osteoarthritis, and bipolar. R1's Wound Physician Progress note dated 1/17/24 documents non-pressure chronic ulcer to left lower leg with fat exposed measuring 15 cm (centimeter) x 10 cm x 01.cm. A new ulcer identified to the right thigh measuring 13 cm x 5 cm x 0.1 cm. The treatment orders for the left lower leg/knee and right thigh include to cleanse with normal saline apply topical gentamycin ointment, cover with adpatic, abdominal pad (abd), and kerlix. R1's Treatment Administration Record for January shows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement R1's wound care doctor's treatment recommendations for one of five residents (R1) reviewed for wound care in the sample of five. The findings include: On 11/01/23 R1 was not in the facility. On 11/01/23 at 11:30 AM, V5 Wound Care Nurse said, R1was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change in the color of his left toe. R1 was seen on 04/05/23 by V4 Wound Doctor/Extender for a stage three pressure ulcer on his left heel and made recommendations. Specialist appointments are made by V6 Appointment Maker. On 11/01/23 at 1:30 PM, V4 Wound Doctor/Extender said, I saw R1 on April 5, 2023, for a left heel Stage 3 pressure ulcer. The dopplar circulation assessment found obstruction in the arteries and veins in the legs. Test results would show 1.0 as normal and 0.9 or less is an occlusion (reduced circulation). R1's results were 0.6 and 0.7, there is a slow rate of blood flow. R1 has PVD-Peripheral Vascular Disease and needs to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$11,170 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $11,170 — penalty dated 2023-10-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alden Debes Rehab & HccRockford, IL 1 of 5Alden Estates of Countryside, IncJefferson, WI 1 of 5Alden Lakeland Rehab & HccChicago, IL 1 of 5Alden Long Grove Rehab &hc CtrLong Grove, IL 1 of 5Alden Park StrathmoorRockford, IL 1 of 5Alden Town Manor Rehab & HccCicero, IL 1 of 5Princeton Rehab & HccChicago, IL 2 of 5Alden Estates Cts Of HuntleyHuntley, IL 2 of 5Alden Estates Of Orland ParkOrland Park, IL 2 of 5Heather Health Care CenterHarvey, IL 2 of 5Wentworth Rehab & HccChicago, IL 3 of 5Alden Estates Of NapervilleNaperville, IL 3 of 5Alden Lincoln Rehab & H C CtrChicago, IL 3 of 5Alden Meadow Park HccClinton, WI 3 of 5Alden Of WaterfordAurora, IL 4 of 5Alden Courts Of ShorewoodShorewood, IL 4 of 5Alden Courts Of WaterfordAurora, IL 4 of 5Alden Des Plaines Rehab & HcDes Plaines, IL 4 of 5Alden Estates Of BarringtonBarrington, IL 4 of 5Alden Estates Of NorthmoorChicago, IL 4 of 5Alden North Shore Rehab & HccSkokie, IL 5 of 5Alden Estates Of EvanstonEvanston, IL 5 of 5Alden Estates Of ShorewoodShorewood, IL 5 of 5Alden Estates Of SkokieSkokie, IL 5 of 5Alden Poplar Creek Rehab & HccHoffman Estates, IL 5 of 5Alden Valley Ridge Rehab & HccBloomingdale, IL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE ALDEN GROUP, LTD.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/17/1968
AUDRA ELISCO GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2018
LAUREN MAGNUSSON GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/28/2018
RANDI SCHULLO GRANTOR TR DATED 11/02/2004Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/28/2018
ELISCO, ARINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
ELISCO, CHARLESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
MAGNUSSON, GARRETTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
MAGNUSSON, PAIGEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
SCHULLO, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
SCHULLO, NICOLEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2013
SCHULLO, RANDIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/16/2010
ALVAREZ BARRERA, EDUARDOIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/16/2020
RUSSELL, JEFFREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/24/2017
CARL, JOANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/17/1968
SCHLOSSBERG, FLOYDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/17/1968
ALDEN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/1968
DAVIS, ESTHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/15/2010
MOLITOR, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/16/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 3%Other / private 19%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,656per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$252per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next