Alden Lincoln Rehab & H C Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.98 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide supervision during a shower. This failure resulted in one (R1) resident sustaining a fall with injury in a sample of eight reviewed for falls.Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 02/24/2026 documents in part that R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Multiple fractures of the pelvis, non-displaced fracture of posterior wall of right acetabulum, chronic diastolic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, poly osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm prostate, cardiac defibrillator.R1's Minimum date set section C for brief mental status dated 1/16/2026 displays that R1 has a score of 14 which means R1 is cognitively intact; section GG Functional abilities dated 10/24/2026 documents in part that R1 required partial/moderate assistance for showers/bathes which means staff does less than half the effort, staff lifts, holds or supports trunk or limbs to assist R1 but provides…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their facility's change in condition policy and failed to follow the Care Plan for one resident (R3) reviewed for resident injury. This failure resulted in R3 falling and sustaining bilateral subdural hemorrhages; and, R3 was admitted to the intensive care unit. Findings include: R3 no longer resides in the facility. R3 was discharged to the hospital on 9/23/24. R3's Facility Reported Incident (IL178511), that occurred on 9/23/24, documents, in part, On 9/23/24 at approximately 8:00 am, resident was observed by staff coming out of room bent forward and fall in the hallway, and staff immediately went to assist resident . MD (physician) gave order to send her (R3) to ER (emergency room) for evaluation. Facility was notified at approximately 5:00 pm that resident will be transferred to (Hospital) for bilateral subdural hematoma . R3's face sheet, documents, in part, diagnosis including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease with early onset;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility: 1. Failed to ensure Registered Dietician/Clinical Dietician's enteral feeding recommendation was implemented. 2. Failed to notify Nurse Practitioner (NP) or physician that enteral feeding recommendation was not carried out. 3. Failed to ensure that enteral feeding and flushing were administered as ordered by physician. These failures resulted in R1's significant / severe weight loss of 11.3lbs (pounds) = 10.7% x 30 days and elevated BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen) level reviewed for improper nursing care in a sample of 3. The finding include: R1's health record documented admission date on 2/14/24 with diagnoses not limited to Unspecified dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, Adult failure to thrive, Encounter for attention to gastrostomy, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, Unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, Chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure (R2's) functional assessment was accurate, failed to timely revise (R3's) care plan (post fall) to prevent an additional fall, failed to ensure that staff are aware of resident fall prevention interventions, failed to implement fall prevention interventions, and failed to provide supervision for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in the following: R3 fell on 3/9/24 and sustained a head laceration requiring staple repair. R3 also fell on 3/10/24 (the following day) and sustained a laceration to bridge of nose, laceration to upper lip, nasal fracture and (left) 3rd-8th rib fractures. R2 fell on 1/15/24 and sustained a head laceration requiring staple repair. R1 fell on 3/4/24 and sustained an eyebrow laceration. Findings include: R3's diagnoses include dementia, epilepsy, history of falling and traumatic brain injury. R3's (1/11/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 4 (severe impairment). R3's (1/11/24) functional assessment affirms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff was in facility as assigned on their schedule; this failure resulted in residents having to receive medications and treatments with a delay. This failure effected four (R2, R6, R7, R8) out of eight residents reviewed for nursing services. Finding include:R2's face sheet dated 02/24/2026 documents in part that R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, essential hypertension, urinary tract infection, peripheral vascular disease, human immunodeficiency virus, bipolar disorder, hyperlipidemia, sleep disorder, malignant neoplasm prostate.R2's Minimum date set section C for brief mental status dated 12/30/2025 displays that R2 has a score of 12 which means R2 is cognitively intact.R6's face sheet dated 02/25/2026 documents in part that R6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic diastolic heart failure, tachycardia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, protein calorie malnutrition, anemia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the provider's order and care plan intervention for one (R1) resident out of three reviewed for wound care treatments. Findings Include:R1's clinical records show an admission date of 4/10/25 with included diagnoses but not limited to non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right lower leg with fat layer exposed, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and lymphedema. R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 is cognitively intact with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15. R1's comprehensive care plan documents in part (date initiated on 4/11/25): [R1] has an actual skin alteration and at risk to develop pressure injury related to altered some ADL [Activities of Daily Living] function and decreased mobility. R1 has right leg-non pressure. Goal: Site(s) will not become infected through next review (date initiated 9/16/25; target date 10/13/25). Intervention reads in part: Treatment as ordered (date initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (R1) within the stipulated two hours time frame. Findings Include: On 9/11/25 at 10:05 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that at approximately 1:00 PM on 9/9/25, the facility was notified via email by V15 (Ombudsman) that she received a call from V3 (Wound Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) about a possible sexual abuse towards R1. V1 stated that he is the abuse coordinator, it is his expectation that all allegations of abuse will be reported to him immediately for investigation, and the initial reportable should be sent to Illinois Department of Public health/IDPH within two hours of notification. V1 stated that V3 should have reported the allegation to him, and he should have sent the initial reportable to IDPH around 3pm and not at 5:44 PM, because he must still follow two hours of reporting allegation of abuse. On 9/11/25 at 12:38 PM, via telephone, V3 (Wound Nurse/LPN) stated that she has been in the facility since March 28, 2025, and she attended in-service on types…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free of accident hazard. This failure affected 1 (R1) resident reviewed for falls in the total sample of 4 residents. Findings include: Review of R1's and R4's census lists documented R1 and R4 were roommates beginning 11/20/2024. On 06/20/2025 at 10:57am, R1 was walking slowly from the activity/dining room to her room. R1 stated, I had fallen but I cannot tell how. I forgot already. On 06/20/2025 at 1:19pm, V7 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated, I know (R1). She fell before and she has a left hip fracture. She is limping when she walks. Before the recent fall on 05/14/2025, she was allowed to walk in the unit without supervision. On 05/14/2025 at dinner time, (R4) was in the dining room but she (R1) was not. I (V7) did not see her (R1) in the dining room at that time, at 4:30pm. Then at around 4:50pm, I heard her screaming aray! in her room. Which translates as ouch!. I went to her room, and I observed her sitting on the floor, between her bed and her roommate's (R4) bed. She was wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call device was placed within a resident ' s reach and failed to ensure staff inquired what a resident needed when responding to a call device. These failures affected 2 (R2 and R3) residents reviewed for call devices in the total sample of 5 residents. Findings include: On 05/23/2025 at 12:15pm, R2 ' s call device was behind the nightstand, not within her reach. V13 (Licensed Practice Nurse) checked the call device string and stated it is tangled. V13 untangled the call device string and clipped to R2 ' s left side. V13 stated placement of the call light should be within R2's reach. So, we can know when she needs assistance. On 05/23/2025 at 12:20pm, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the last time I went to her room was an hour ago. I did not check for the placement of R2's call light. On 05/23/2025 at 12:31pm, the call device overhead light indicator on R3 ' s room was lit. On 05/23/2025 at 12:33pm, V14 went inside the room and informed R3 that staff are getting ready to serve lunch. V14…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a careplan for a resident ' s known behavior and failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. These failures affected 2 (R1 and R3) residents reviewed for careplan in the total sample of 5 residents. Findings include: On 05/23/2025 at 2:25pm, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated I know (R1) ' s incident was after supper, on the second floor dining room, as I was wheeling her (R1) out and before I made a turn to the exit, out of the dining room, she grabbed the wheel of (R5) ' s wheelchair. Her (R1) left hand got caught on the wheel of (R5) ' s wheelchair and she lunged and fell. On 05/23/2025 at 2:45pm, V7 stated I am familiar with her (R1). When I first came in, the senior CNAs told me that she grabs on to things and to be careful. The first time I was assigned to her, I already noticed behaviors of grabbing onto things each time I wheel her out of the dining room to her bed, she will hold onto something like the rail. She grabs stuff all day long. If you have to toilet her and change her diaper, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to institute interventions for a resident ' s known behavior to provide safety for the resident and other residents. This failure resulted in a resident falling and sustaining a closed fracture of the phalanx (small bone) of index finger and contusion of the head. This deficient practice affected 1 (R1) resident reviewed for quality of care in the total sample of 5 residents. Findings include: On 05/23/2025 at 2:25pm, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated I know (R1) ' s incident was after supper, on the second floor dining room, as I was wheeling her (R1) out and before I made a turn to the exit, out of the dining room, she grabbed the wheel of (R5) ' s wheelchair. Her (R1) left hand got caught on the wheel of (R5) ' s wheelchair and she lunged and fell. On 05/23/2025 at 2:45pm, V7 stated I am familiar with her (R1). When I first came in, the senior CNAs told me that she grabs on to things and to be careful. The first time I was assigned to her, I already noticed that behavior of grabbing onto things each time I wheel her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide a person-centered plan of care that is consistent of functional abilities to meet the needs of 1 (R1) out 1 resident for a total of 4 residents reviewed for care plan. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old, currently living in facility. R1's initial admission date was 08/24/2024 with medical diagnosis of severe dementia, major depressive disorder, history of anterior displaced type II Dens fracture on 11/16/2023. On 01/30/2025 at 12:16 PM, R1 was seen with neck collar, and non-verbal when name was called. R1 does not respond to verbal stimuli. V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) went inside the room to turn off the call light. V8 was asked how R1 transfers. V8 replied that R1 needs mechanical lift during transfer and uses Geri-chair, not wheelchair if needed to be transferred from bed to chair. V8 stated that R1 needs stretcher when going out to an appointment and does not use wheelchair. V8 stated because R1 needs stretcher, ambulance needs to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the functional abilities assessment and transfer care plan for 1 resident (R1) who sustained left femur fracture, out of 1 resident of a total sample of 4 residents reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old, currently living in facility. R1's initial admission date was 08/24/2024 with medical diagnosis of severe dementia, major depressive disorder, history of anterior displaced type II Dens fracture on 11/16/2023. On 01/30/2025 at 12:16 PM, R1 was seen with neck collar, and was non-verbal when name was called. R1 does not respond to verbal stimuli. V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) went inside the room to turn off the call light. V8 was asked how R1 transfers. V8 replied that R1 needs mechanical lift during transfer and uses Geri-chair, not wheelchair if needed to be transferred from bed to chair. V8 stated that R1 needs stretcher when going out to an appointment and does not use wheelchair. V8 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine and assess a resident to determine if self-administration of medications is appropriate, failed to obtain a physician's order for medication self-administration, failed to develop a person-centered care plan addressing self-administration of medications, failed to obtain physician orders for resident's medications, and failed to follow-up on the medication administration for 1 (R1) out of 3 residents reviewed. Findings Include: On 10/29/24 at 10:37 AM, R1 was sitting up in [R1's] bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R1 showed Surveyor multiple loose pills inside a small clear pouch on top of R1's bedside table. When Surveyor asked what those pills are, R1 answered, These are my 6:00 AM and 9:00 AM medications. I have here three pills of Sevelamer, one Losartan, one Eliquis, one antibiotic, two 25 mg of Metoprolol, and one renal vitamin. I have not taken these because I haven't eaten anything yet. On 10/29/24 at 10:58 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-03-25
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-23 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL