Alden Estates of Countryside, Inc
1130 Collins Road, Jefferson, WI 53549 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (920) 674-3170 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $397,046 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.5% | 18.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.6% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.9% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.8%CMS range 41.9–57.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.6–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 53.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 56.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.8–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4.) R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gout, congestive heart failure, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and inflammation of right lower extremity. The most recent Annual MDS (minimum data set), dated [DATE], documents that R91 has a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 13 indicating R91 is cognitively intact. R91 is at risk for developing a pressure injury and at the time did not have any unhealed areas of skin impairment. Surveyor conducted a review of R91's individual plan of care and noted the following: R91 is with actual alteration in skin integrity r/t (related to) red groin, and MASD (moisture associated skin damage), immobility and incontinence. Res (resident) refusing air mattress and prefers to have a foam pressure reducing mattress. Hx (history): edema and diabetic and stasis ulcers to bil (bilateral) lower extremities. Skin tears to RLE (right lower extremity) noted. Resident takes off own dressings at times if dressings on and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed received care and services based on a comprehensive assessment, person centered care plan, and resident's and/or responsible party's choices. The evening of [DATE], Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-W transferred R1 with assist of 1 and a pivot transfer. R1's care plan documents R1 was assessed to require an EZ-stand and assist of 1 for transfers. Early morning of [DATE], R1 complained of left knee pain at a 10/10 which R1 stated began after the transfer the night before with CNA-W. A telehealth visit was completed the morning of [DATE] and Voltaren gel and ice packs were ordered. No imaging was ordered as R1 was receiving hospice services and comfort focused measures were implemented. R1 did have prior PRN (as needed) orders for Morphine and Tramadol. R1 continued to report pain levels of 10/10, 9/10, and 7/10. R1 began to refuse assistance with cares, to get out of bed, and meals. A thorough assessment of R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that staff promptly consulted with a physician when 1 of 1 resident (R414) experienced a significant change in condition. R414 had unwitnessed falls on 10/27/23 and 10/29/23. After each fall, R414 experienced a significant change in condition with signs that are consistent with a head injury. Despite these changes, the Hospice nurse assigned to R414's case declined to send R414 to the emergency room for evaluation. The facility did not consult with the Hospice provider, R414's primary physician, or the Medical Director regarding R414's continued decline. R414 subsequently passed away. The facility's failure to promptly consult with the MD regarding R414's significant change in condition and for failing to get direction from the MD as to whether the resident should be sent out for further evaluation created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 10/27/23. Surveyor notified the Director of Nursing (DON)-B of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/18/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and eliminate all known and foreseeable accident hazards in 1 (R414) of 1 resident reviewed with a significant change in condition. The facility had assessed R414 as being at high risk for falls. On [DATE], R414 had an unwitnessed fall. Facility charting on [DATE] at 5:30 pm indicates the CNA found R414 on the bathroom floor. R414 was noted to have hit his head and was experiencing altered mentation with being only oriented to self. R414's baseline orientation is to person, place, time, and event. The facility did not do a post-fall investigation on this date to determine the circumstances surrounding the fall to analyze what occurred and what could be done to prevent further falls. On [DATE], R414 sustained a second unwitnessed fall while reaching for his call light that was not within reach (contrary to the care plan, which directed staff to keep the call light within reach). R414 was found on the floor lying on his left side next to the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-27 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Hospice collaboration and communication processes were established to ensure continuity of care between hospice and the facility for 1 (R414) of 1 resident. The facility did not consistently update the physician or the power of attorney (POA) with changes in R414's condition; in failing to do so, the facility did not ensure collaboration of care between hospice, the facility, the physician, and the power of attorney. R414 had a change in condition with an unwitnessed fall on 10/27/23. R414 was noted to have hit his head, to have altered mentation, vomiting while being transferred to his bed using a Hoyer lift and fluctuating unstable blood pressure (BP) readings (BP 158/84, 80/40 and 200/94) at the time of the fall. On 10/28/23, R414 presented with further changes with confusion, rambling and slurred speech, weak hand grasp, poor coordination, being hunched over in wheelchair, lethargy, hands shaking, and needing assistance with eating. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for medication errors.R2 was prescribed Levetiracetam (Keppra) (a medication used to treat seizures) for 7 days as a seizure prophylaxis. The facility failed to clarify, transcribe, and follow the physician order. R2 continued to receive the medication. This resulted in actual harm when R2 experienced a decline and was readmitted to the hospital, for Acute metabolic encephalopathy - Multifactorial at this point including continued use Keppra (serious condition characterized by diffuse brain dysfunction due to metabolic disturbances, often leading to confusion, memory loss or loss of consciousness; it's critical to identify and treat the underlying cause, it's often reversible with prompt treatment) requiring intravenous fluids, monitoring, and the discontinuation of the medication. The facility did not thoroughly investigate this medication error. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 resident reviewed for accidents had adequate supervision, and associative devices to prevent accidents. Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA)-W transferred R 1 with assist of 1 and a pivot transfer. R1's care plan documents R1 is assessed to require assist of 1 and an EZ stand for transfers. R1 complained of pain at a level of 10/10 with swelling and bruising noted following the transfer. R1 experienced a change of condition following the transfer and passed away four days after the transfer. An autopsy was conducted and it was determined R1 suffered a fracture of the left distal femur related to the transfer. The Medical Examiner determined the femur fracture was the cause of R1's death. Findings include: The Facility policy titled, Fall Management Program, dated 8/20, documents, .Policy: The facility is committed to minimizing resident falls and/or injury so as to maximize each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of cerebral infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery (stroke), aphasia, abdominal aortic aneurysm, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness and age-related physical debility. R2's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], documented R2 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0 with both short- and long-term memory problems. MDS section GG, documents R2 is dependent with oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, upper/lower body dressing and putting on footwear. R2 needs substantial to maximum assistance with eating and personal hygiene. MDS section H, documents R2 is frequently incontinent of both urine and bowel. MDS, section K, documents R2 has a feeding tube and is on a mechanically soft diet requiring change in texture of food or liquids. Record review of R2's Falls Risk assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they provided the necessary care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 out of 5 residents (R38) reviewed who were at high risk. R38 returned to the facility following surgical repair to the left knee. R38 was to wear an immobilizer to the left lower extremity for 6 weeks after the surgery. The facility did not provide monitoring of R38's skin under the immobilizer and R38 developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer to the back of her left lower leg. This is evidenced by: R38 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following an acute left distal femoral fracture with surgical repair. Hospital discharge instructions included, wound/skin care: may reinforce left knee dressing; otherwise leave in place until ortho follow-up. Stage #3 coccyx pressure injury - silicone boarded foam change 3 times a week, offload from pressure. Surveyor conducted a review of the physician orders for November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice in the development and healing of pressure injuries for 1 (R72) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R72 developed deep tissue injuries (DTI) to the left heel and the left outer ankle on 7/28/2022, the right heel on 9/27/2022, and the right and left buttocks on 11/22/2022. The left heel DTI healed on 9/20/2022. The left outer ankle DTI was recategorized as a diabetic ulcer and then reclassified as a DTI with eschar. The definition of a DTI by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) is a purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear. A DTI is not open, covered by eschar, or have any other type of tissue present. The right heel DTI developed eschar and the staging of the pressure injury did not reflect the new tissue type. R72 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that resident grievances and concerns were investigated in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for grievances. This failure had the potential to affect all residents expressing grievances or concerns, requiring investigation and intervention by the facility. Findings include: Review of R2's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral palsy. Review of R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/23/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated R2 had moderately impaired cognition. The admission assessment also revealed R2 was occasionally incontinent of urine and needed some help from another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to ensure proper use, cleaning, and disinfection of shared glucometer (a medical device used to record blood sugar levels) for three of three residents (Resident (R) 7, R13 and R12) of 12 sample residents. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 failed to properly disinfect a shared glucometer and practice proper hand hygiene. This deficient practice had the potential of placing residents at risk for transmission of bloodborne pathogens and cross-contamination. Findings include: 1. Review of R7's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 06/05/23, with the following diagnoses: type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. 2. Review of R13's Face Sheet located in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 11/15/23, with the following diagnoses: type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. 3. Review of R12's Face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene before and after wearing gloves during blood glucose checks for five of five resident (Resident (R) 5, R6, R7, R8, and R9) observed during blood glucose checks. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for the spread of infection and cross-contamination.Findings include: The following was observed during observation of blood sugar administration starting on 10/03/25 at 7:07 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1. LPN1 was observed performing hand hygiene at her cart. LPN1 picked up a previously cleaned glucometer from the cart, before going into R5's room. LPN1 entered R5's room, donned a pair of gloves, and performed a fingerstick glucose check on R5. LPN1 exited R5's room still wearing gloves and discarded her gloves and lancet at the medication cart on 10/03/25 at 7:10 AM. LPN1 performed hand hygiene.On 10/03/25 at 7:11 AM, LPN1 donned a pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene and cleaned the glucometer. LPN1 performed hand hygiene at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 111 of 111 residents dining in the facility. Staff did not wear beard restraints consistently in the kitchen. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled, Hair Covering dated 5/24, states in part: Policy Hair will be covered when in the kitchen operations areas. Purpose To prevent physical contamination of food Procedure 1. While in the kitchen operations area staff will cover hair to prevent physical contamination of food . 3. Staff with facial hair, with the exception of eyebrow and eyelashes, will wear a beard cover. Mustache or beard restraints shall be used for any facial hair exceeding half (1/2) inch in length. On 06/09/25, at 10:30 AM, Surveyor observed Dietary Director-C preparing rue with beard net not pulled up over mustache. On 06/09/25, at 10:36 AM, Surveyor observed Dietary Director-C stirring pots on stove with beard net not pulled up over mustache. On 06/09/25, at 10:48 AM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-23 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it completed accurate mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform electronic format to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 111 residents residing in the facility. Staffing information for Quarter 2 ([DATE] - [DATE]) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) was not accurately submitted to CMS. Findings include: The CMS Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated [DATE], indicates: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS .1.2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Kidney Disease, encounter for fitting and adjustment of Urinary Device. R64's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. R64 has an indwelling catheter and no trial of a toileting program. R64's Care Plan, date initiated 5/13/25, documents, a focus area of Bowel and Bladder support is required. The goal is R64 will maintain current of bowel incontinence and R64 will show no complications secondary to catheter use. Interventions document, in part, .Keep drainage bag covered to promote privacy. R64's Physician orders, dated 5/12/25, documents, CATHETER: INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER CARE DAILY AND PRN (as needed) every night shift related to ENCOUNTER FOR FITTING AND ADJUSTMENT OF URINARY DEVICE AND as needed related to ENCOUNTER FOR FITTING AND ADJUSTMENT OF URINARY DEVICE (sic). On 06/09/25 at 10:15 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse affecting 2 (R67 and R513) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse concerns. R513 had behaviors of agitation, wandering, and physical behaviors toward others. On 4/5/2025, R513 entered R67's room and was hitting and kicking R67 after R67 had fallen to the ground. Supervision of R513 was not increased with the heightening of behaviors to prevent abuse to R67. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Abuse Policy dated 9/2020 documents: POLICY: . This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. ABUSE PREVENTION PROGRAM . 3. Prevention: The facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect and theft by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R97, R39) of 5 residents reviewed were free from chemical restraints. *The facility has no evidence of Abnormal Involuntary Monitory Scale (AIMS) monitoring prior to administrating R97's psychotropic medications. * The facility has no evidence of Abnormal Involuntary Monitory Scale (AIMS) monitoring prior to administrating R39's psychotropic medications. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medications - Use of, dated 09/2020, documents the following: .A baseline AIMS assessment will be initiated when receiving antipsychotic medications. (A re-assessment will be completed every six months.) . 1.) R97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and dementia (memory loss). Surveyor reviewed R97's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 2 out of 6 residents (R92 & R95) reviewed for being at high risk for falls, received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. R92 is at high risk for falls and had 4 unwitnessed falls at the facility. The facility did not ensure they thoroughly investigated each fall to determine the root cause and to assure that all interventions were in place at the time of the fall and were effective. R95 is at high risk for falls and has experienced several falls while at the facility. The facility did not ensure that they followed R95's toileting plan, which would reduce the chance that R95 would try to toilet herself and potentially fall. In addition, Surveyor observed R95 being transferred with a gait belt and 1 staff member when the plan of care indicates she needs a hoyer lift for transfers. Findings include: Policy Review Fall Management Program, dated 08/2020 The facility is committed to minimizing resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 (R51) of 8 residents reviewed for mood concerns. R51 told a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) they did not want to live. No documentation was found that a suicidal evaluation was completed, the physician was notified, or a Care Plan was developed to address R51's depression. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Suicidal Ideation dated 10/2024 documents: POLICY: Facility staff will accurately assess, differentiate, and respond appropriately to individuals expressing suicidal ideation or passive death wishes, ensuring safety, appropriate intervention, and documentation. DEFINITIONS: Suicidal Ideation (SI): Thoughts of ending one's life, which may include a plan, intent, or means to act. Passive Death Wish (PDW): A desire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist, and that irregularities identified by the pharmacist were reviewed, and action was taken to address them, for 1 (R39) of 5 residents reviewed. R39 did not have regular monthly reviews performed by the pharmacist. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews (MMR) Scheduled and Interim and dated 01/2022, documents the following: The consultant pharmacist will review the medication regimen, as required by State and Federal regulations. This review should include a review of the resident's medical record. The consultant pharmacist's MMR report or the interim MMR report will be given to the director of nursing (or designee), upon completion of all medication regimen reviews. The facility nursing staff will follow up with the prescribing physician and record the response on the report and/or the interim review and make changes as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R94's diagnoses include Atrial Fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular pulse rate) and Hypertension (High blood pressure). R94's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/25/25 documents R94 as being rarely to never understood. R94's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 4/25/25 documents that R94 received an anticoagulant (a medication that thins ones blood to prevent clotting) medication during the 7 day assessment period. Surveyor reviewed R94's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which documents R94's current physician orders, Medication Administration Record (MAR), and Treatment Administration Record (TAR). R39 is prescribed Eliquis 5 mg two times a day for Atrial Fibrillation, last ordered on 10/25/24. Surveyor reviewed R94's MAR and TAR. Surveyor noted there is no documented monitoring of R94's Eliquis, an anticoagulant medication, for potential signs and symptoms of an adverse effect from this medication, such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 (R25) of 1 residents reviewed for a mechanically-altered diet. R25 has a mechanical soft diet order, R25 was served a regular diet meal. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Regular Ground/Mechanical Soft dated 7/2023, documents (in part): Purpose The regular mechanical soft diet is for adults who have difficulty chewing. This diet is similar to the regular diet with some modifications to hard to chew foods. This diet is not intended to be used for modifications required by the National Dysphagia Diets. Rationale Foods that are difficult to chew are replaced with foods that have been altered into a form that can be easily swallowed. Food that may be modified because they are tough and difficult to chew include meats, poultry, fish, raw vegetables, and other fibrous foods . According to Healthline.com A mechanical soft diet is a texture-modified diet that restricts foods that are difficult to chew or swallow. It's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide adaptive eating equipment to 1 (R95) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for assistive eating devices. Surveyor observed R95 did not receive therapy recommended assistive eating devices needed to maintain or improve R95's ability to eat or drink independently during 2 out of 3 Surveyor observed meals. Finding include: Facility Clinical Practice Guidelines titled; Feeding a Resident dated 09/20. Policy: Residents who need assistance will be fed a well-balanced meal, by a nurse, C.N.A. (certified nursing assistant), or an individual who has completed a state approved feeding course Procedure: 3. Check the tray before serving the meal to make sure everything is on the tray and it is accordance with the resident's diet. Correct anything wrong 9. Use appropriate utensil and adaptive equipment to feed the resident R95 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia (a decline in mental ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (R32, R74) of 6 residents observed. *R32 was readmitted to facility on 5/13/25 with a hospital acquired stage 3 pressure injury. R32 was placed on Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) on 5/13/25. Surveyor observed on 6/9/25 R32 had no indication that R32 was on EBP. Care Plan documents R32 continued EBP until 6/12/25 when the facility discontinued EBP for a stage 3 pressure ulcer not yet healed. Surveyor observed R32's wound care on the stage 3 coccyx pressure ulcer on 6/11/25 with nurse not following EBP during R32's treatment. *R74 was observed by Surveyor on 6/9/25 [NAME] with drainage on R74's bandaged leg wounds and not in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) until 6/10/25. R74's care plan has no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents Pneumococcal immunizations were offered, or refused, as eligible. This was observed with 3 (R19, R109, and R163) of 5 residents whose immunization records were reviewed. *R19, is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE] and did not have documentation of Pneumococcal vaccine being offered until 6/11/25, after Surveyor asked for records, then a verbal consent was obtained from R19's Power of Attorney (POA) * R109, is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE] and did not have documentation of Pneumococcal vaccine being offered until 6/11/25, after Surveyor asked for records. * R163, is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE] and did not have documentation of Pneumococcal vaccine being offered until 6/11/25, after Surveyor asked for records. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, dated 01/2025 was reviewed. The policy documents in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility that residents will be offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 immunizations for 3 (R19, R109, and R163) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. *R19's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R19 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. * R109's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R109 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. * R163's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R163 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Covid-19 Vaccinations, dated 02/2025 was reviewed. The policy documents in part: Policy: When recommended vaccines are available, the facility will ensure COVID-19 vaccines are readily accessible to both residents and staff. COVID-19 vaccinations can be administered to residents and staff at the facility by a contractor provider, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to allow residents to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 109 residents residing at the facility. Surveyor conducted interviews with residents and staff in which they expressed concerns regarding challenging staffing levels. Surveyor conducted a record review of the Facility's staff schedules and verified the Facility is not providing staffing levels that meet the Facility identified staffing needs documented in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: *R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documents that R4 is cognitively intact. On 4/2/25 at 2:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed R4. R4 stated R4 does use the call light when R4 needs help. Surveyor asked what the average wait time is for R4's call light to be answered. R4 stated that it depends on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the Facility did not implement their policies and procedures for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect or injuries of unknown origin for 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed with allegations of abuse. R 1 complained of 10/10 left knee pain following a pivot transfer with assist of 1 the evening of 2/7/25. R1 was assessed to require an EZ stand and assist of 1 for transfers. R1 informed Facility staff in the early morning hours of 2/8/25 the 10/10 left knee pain began after the incorrect transfer method was used on 2/7/25. It was later determined R1 sustained a left distal femur fracture. The Facility did not implement their Abuse Prevention policy and procedure as evidenced by not reporting the incorrect transfer resulting in, significant pain, bruising, and swelling to the Nursing Home Administrator or the State Agency. The Facility did not report R1's major injury of the left distal femur fracture following an incorrect transfer and not following R1's care plan to the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse, suspected neglect, and/or injury of unknown origin were reported to the Nursing Home Administrator and the State Agency during the required timeframe. On [DATE] R1 was transferred by a pivot transfer and assist of 1 when R1 was assessed to require an EZ stand and assist of 1 for transfers. Following the transfer R1 complained of 10/10 pain, swelling and bruising to the left knee. R1 informed staff the pain started after staff transferred her without the EZ stand. R1 declined physically and cognitively following the incorrect transfer and passed away at the Facility on [DATE]. R1's Responsible Party expressed concern to the Facility they believed R1 was dropped during the transfer. The Facility did not report the incident to the Nursing Home Administrator or State Agency. Findings include: The Facility policy entitled, Abuse Policy, dated 9/20, documents, in part, .Policy: This facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were seen by a physician or physician extender for 2 (R3 & R1) of 3 residents reviewed for physician services. * R3 did not have alternating visits between the physician and physician extender. * R1 was not seen by a physician every 60 days following 90 days after admission. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Medical Care Services and dated 9/2020 documents under policy Residents will receive medical care and services which meet their individual needs and ensure adequate health care. Under procedures documents 4. Residents will be seen by a physician or delegated physician's assistant or nurse practitioner at least once every thirty (30) days for the first 90 days after admission and at least once every 60 days thereafter. A physician visit is considered timely if it occurs not later than 10 days after the date the visit was required. 5. After the initial physician visit in SNF (skilled nursing facility) a qualified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to allow residents to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 113 residents residing at the facility. Surveyors conducted interviews with residents and staff in which both expressed concerns regarding low staffing levels. The survey team had observations of resident call lights not being answered for extended periods of time. Surveyors interviewed residents who expressed concerns regarding extensive call light wait times. Surveyors conducted a record review of Facility's nursing schedules and daily staff postings and verified the Facility is not providing staffing levels that meet the Facility identified staffing needs documented in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: * R3's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/21/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicates cognitively intact. On 12/2/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-03 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility did not ensure water was consistently being passed to Residents. This has the potential to affect R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9, and other residents residing in the facility who would like water to drink in their rooms. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Water Passing and dated 9/2020 under purpose documents To maintain fresh drinking water accessible to resident's around the clock. Procedure documents 1. Wash hands. 2. Gather supplies. 3. Fill clean water pitchers/cups with ice and water every shift and as necessary. Resident's on thickened liquids or fluid restrictions will be identified. 4. Knock before entering room. 5. Distribute cups to resident's room. Leave on bedside table with a straw (if able to have straw). 6. Water will not be left at bedside on the dementia unit unless appropriate. 7. Offer each resident a drink. Record on I & O (intake and output) sheet (if applicable). 8. Discard used supplies in appropriate manner. * R3's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/21/24 has a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not have evidence all alleged violations of mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 (R1) of 1 residents. R1's allegation of being yelled at and handled roughly was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Abuse Policy (For Wisconsin Facilities) and dated 9/20 under policy documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility will report reasonable suspicion of a crime. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: .6. Implementing systems to investigate all reports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 3 residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis. On 11/10/24 R3 was prescribed an anti-anxiety medication, Lorazepam 0.5 mg every four hours PRN without an end date. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medications - Use Of and dated 9/2020 does not address stop dates for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications. R3's diagnoses includes multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating poly neuritis, diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. R3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Hospital discharge documentation dated 11/10/24 includes under new medications lorazepam (LORazepam 0.5 mg (milligrams) oral tablet) 1 Tabs Gastrostomy tube/PE (percutaneous endoscopic) every 4 hours as needed anxiety. On 12/2/24, at 11:29 a.m., Surveyor reviewed R3's physician orders and noted an order dated 11/10/24 for Lorazepam 0.5 mg. Give 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents received prescribed medication as ordered by the physician to meet residents needs. * R1 did not receive the scheduled Oxycodone 5mg on 7/12/24, 7/13/24, 9/8/24, 9/13/24, 10/8/24, 10/18/24, 10/28/24 and on 11/6/24 at different prescribed times. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Reordering Medications (Facilities Ordering Refills on Demand) and dated 01/2022 under Policy/Purpose documents Medications are reordered in advance so as not to have lapses in therapy. Under Procedure documents 1. The nursing staff is responsible for reordering medications. 2. Medications should be reordered when, in the judgment of the nurse, a 2-day supply of medication remains. 3. Reorders should be submitted by one of the following methods: a. Using the re-order function in the facility's e-MAR (electronic medication administration record) system (only if there is a pharmacy interface), or b. Removing the barcode label, affixing it to the reorder sheet, and faxing it-in a fax document carrier-to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did implement effective infection prevention measures. This included N95 mask fit testing for staff with the potential to effect all 115 residents in the facility. This includes Foley bag maintenance in 1(R85) of 4 residents observed with Foley bags. * The facility did not ensure all staff exposed to COVID-19 were properly fit tested for a N95 mask to prevent the spread of infection. * The facility did not ensure R85's Foley bag was maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure for Management of Residents with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 Infection or Identified as a Close Contact, dated 1/5/24, was reviewed by Surveyor. The section: Residents with Confirmed COVID-19 documents: . 3. Isolate using Transmission-Based Precautions, . 10. Staff must wear full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) (N95 respirator, gown, gloves, eye protection) when providing care. The facility did not have a specific policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure resident's received the required written notice information related to their transfers out of the facility. This was observed with 7 (R108, R38, R25, R77, R54, R85 and R65) of 7 resident reviewed transfers. *R108, R38, R25, R77, R54, R85 and R65 were transferred to the hospital from the facility. A transfer notice including the following information was not provided: -A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; . (v) The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; (vi) For nursing facility residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities or related disabilities, the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 out of 1 allegations of an injury of unknown source (R38) were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the State Survey Agency. In addition, the facility did not ensure they reported the results of the investigation, within 5 working days to the State Survey Agency for 1 out of 1 allegations of an injury of unknown source (R38). R38 experienced pain in the left knee although no injury had been reported. An X-ray was obtained and it was noted R38 had suffered a left distal femur fracture and was admitted to the hospital and underwent surgical repair. The facility did not report the injury within 2 hours of being aware of the femur fracture, to the State Survey Agency, when they were not able to determine the cause of the fracture. In addition, the facility did not report, within 5 working days, the outcome of their investigation of the injury of unknown source for R38 following the diagnosis of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents had an individualized comprehensive plan of care. This was observed with 2 (R85 and R81) of 23 resident comprehensive care plan reviews. 1. R85 was admitted to the facility with an indwelling catheter after a short stay in the hospital and there was no comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address catheter care. 2. R81 was admitted to the facility on anticoagulant medication and there was no comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address monitoring of the anticoagulant. Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 11/2017 states: An individualized, person-centered comprehensive care plan, including measurable objectives with timetables to meet Resident physical, psychosocial and functional needs, is developed and implemented for each Resident. #4. Care plan interventions are initiated based on an analysis of information collected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility did not ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter received consult services. This was observed with 1(R22) of 4 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter. * R22 was admitted without an indwelling catheter. R22 went out to the hospital due to a change in condition and an indwelling catheter was placed in the hospital due to urinary retention. There was no follow-up with a Urology to determine long term needs of the catheter. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Indwelling Catheter, dated 9/20, was reviewed by Surveyor. The procedure includes under 15: A resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible. On 03/11/24 at 1:08 PM, Surveyor observed and spoke with R22. R22 was observed to have an indwelling Foley bag hanging below their wheelchair. R22 did not know why they had an indwelling catheter. R22 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R82) of 1 resident was properly assessed for the use of bed rails and the facility did not have evidence that risks and benefits were discussed with the resident and/or representative. R82's was assessment to not be appropriate for the use of bed rails. R82's bed was observed to have grab bars. Findings include: The facility's policy entitled, Side Rail Assessment, dated 9/2020 states: It is the policy of this facility to properly assess a resident's needs for side rail use. The side rail assessment form will be completed upon admission, readmission, with significant change and annually thereafter. R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation with diagnoses that include fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, presence of left artificial hip joint, lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood, schizophrenia, moderate intellectual disabilities and history of traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was available to provide nursing and related services to assure residents attained or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as determined by the resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment potentially affecting 115 of 115 residents in the facility. Residents voiced concerns there were not enough staff to care for their needs. The facility was identified as having consistently low weekend staffing on the Staffing Data Report submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) from 10/1/23 through 12/31/23. Staff indicated there were not enough staff on the unit to assist with residents' cares and needs. Findings include: The Facility Assessment stated the following for Licensed Nurses and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) staffing coverage: Evaluation of overall number of facility staff needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility did not ensure that residents were not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record; residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated; and PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 3 of 5 residents (R25, 103, and R81) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R25 did not have required gradual dose reduction for Mirtazepine (antidepressant medicaiton). R103 was prescribed PRN Lorazepam (sedative/antianxiety) without documentation of rationale by the Physician to extend beyond 14 days. R81 was prescribed Primidone (Anticovulsant) without clear indication of use. Findings include: R25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Dysarthria, Dysphagia, Spondylosis lumbar region, Adult Failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not review and revise the plan of care for 5 Residents (R) (R5, R10, R2, R12, and R4) of 6 residents reviewed. R5 had a history of wandering and wandered into several residents' rooms. Following an incident on 10/3/23, the facility did not update R5's care plan with interventions to keep R5 and other residents safe. In addition, stop sign banners were placed across the doorways of R10, R2, R12 and R4 after R5 wandered into their rooms. The intervention was not added to R10, R2, R12, and R4's plan of care. Findings include: The facility's Review of Care Plans policy, dated 11/2017, indicated: The Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for periodic review and adjustments of the plan of care: d. When there is a change to the plan of treatment goals or interventions. On 12/8/23, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. R5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 10 residents reviewed. On 10/25/23, R6 had an injury of unknown origin that was reported to the State Agency (SA). The facility did not thoroughly investigate the injury of unknown origin when they did not interview residents regarding abuse concerns following the unwitnessed injury. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy for Wisconsin Facilities, dated 9/20, indicated: The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: 3. Establishing an environment that promotes resident sensitivity, resident security, and prevention of mistreatment. 4. Identifying occurrences and patterns of potential mistreatment. 5. Immediately protecting residents involved in identifying reports of possible abuse 6. Implementing systems to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure 2 Resident (R8 & R11) of 8 sampled residents were assessed and had physician orders to self administer respiratory treatment medications and to keep the medications bedside. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated August 2023, revealed, Policy: Residents may be allowed to self-administer medication according to physician's order unless such practice for the resident is deemed unsafe. 1. A review of R8's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/06/2022. A review of R8's Medical Diagnosis document revealed the resident had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and need for assistance with personal care. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/28/2023, revealed R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of R8's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of manufacturer's information the facility failed to ensure they followed appropriate infection control procedures for the storage of oxygen tubing and nasal cannula's and the storage and cleaning of CPAP equipment for 3 (R3, R8, and R11) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1.) A review of R3's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/24/2023 with diagnoses that included obstructive sleep apnea. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/29/2023, revealed the R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of R3's care plan initiated on 06/26/2023, indicated the resident had a potential for respiratory difficulty secondary to sleep apnea. Interventions directed staff to assist the resident with their CPAP machine as ordered. A review of R3's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 06/30/2023 to apply the resident's CPAP machine at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews the facility did not ensure proper infection control measures were completed during medication administration for 1 (R16) of 4 residents observed. During medication administration a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed to handle medications with bare hands. Findings included: On 10/24/2023 at 7:57 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T was observed preparing R16's medications for medication administration. LPN T placed the medications into a medication cup and touched the medications with her ungloved hands. At 8:05 AM, LPN T counted the medications in the medication cup by tipping the cup toward a second medication cup and using an ungloved finger to move the medication from one cup into the other. At 8:06 AM, LPN T then moved all crushable medication tablets back into the first medication cup and held the medication that could not be crushed with her ungloved fingers. During an interview on 10/24/2023 at 8:14 AM, LPN T stated she should not have put fingers into the medication cup because it could contaminate the cup and medications from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 7 residents residing on the 200 unit of the facility. The facility utilizes a shared glucometer between residents. The glucometer was not cleaned according to manufacturer's recommendations between residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 5/28/20 documents (in part) . .12. After each use clean/disinfect outside of the meter with disinfectant wipes. a. All surfaces of Blood Glucose Monitoring Machine if visibly soiled need to be physically cleaned to remove gross soil with one wipe and then a second wipe to disinfect the surface. c. If using Super Sani wipes for treated surface of the blood glucose monitoring machine for Covid 19 should remain wet for 2 minutes. Surveyor review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that alleged violations involving neglect were reported to the State Survey Agency within the required time frame for 1 of 3 (R15) residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. R15's nursing progress notes on 10/2/22 documented an allegation of neglect that was not reported to the State Agency. Findings include: R15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Dementia, severe protein- calorie malnutrition, Chronic Kidney Disease and Major Depressive Disorder. R15's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/25/22 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The facility policy titled Abuse Policy dated 9/20 documents (in part) . .The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility will report reasonable suspicion of a crime. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not have evidence that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 (R15) residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. R15's nursing progress notes on 10/2/22 documented an allegation of neglect that was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: R15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Dementia, severe protein- calorie malnutrition, Chronic Kidney Disease and Major Depressive Disorder. R15's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/25/22 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The facility policy titled Abuse Policy dated 9/20 documents (in part) . .The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility will report reasonable suspicion of a crime. This facility therefore…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not notify the resident or resident's representative in writing of the transfer including the location to which the resident is transferred, a statement of the resident's appeal rights with the name, address, and telephone number of the entity which receives the request and information on how to obtain an appeal form for 3 (R29, R72, and R20) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer to the hospital. R29 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No written transfer notification was provided to R29's representative that included the location R29 was being transferred to and information regarding appeal rights and how to obtain them. R72 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No written transfer notification was provided to R72 or R72's representative that included the location R72 was being transferred to and information regarding appeal rights and how to obtain them. R20 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No written transfer notification was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure resident's with mental health disorders, and intellectual disabilities, were appropriately screened. This was discovered with 1 (R42) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) screening. *R42 has a diagnosis of intellectual disability and his PASARR Level I did not indicate this diagnoses upon admission to the facility. The facility's failure to identify R42's diagnoses of intellectual disability on the PASARR resulted in inaccurate completion of R42's PASARR Level 1 Screen. If R42's PASARR was completed correctly a positive Level 1 screen would have been documented. The facility did not identify R42's positive Level 1 screen which would have required the facility to refer R42 for an in-depth evaluation by a state-designated authority, known as a Level 2 screen. Since R42 was not referred for a Level 2 screen it allowed for the potential for R42 to be placed in an inappropriate environment and/or not receive the necessary specialized services related to the diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (R5) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. R5 was transferring with the use of a sit-to-stand lift (EZ lift) on 9/3/2022 when R5 slipped out of the sling and sustained a fall. The facility did not do a thorough investigation as to the cause of the fall to prevent future falls. R5 had contradicting transfer statuses: R5's Care Plan stated R5 was a Hoyer lift transfer and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Care Card stated R5 was an EZ lift transfer. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Management of Falls dated 9/2020 states: 3. Develop a plan of care to include goals and interventions which address resident's risk factors. 9. Review and/or modify the resident's plan of care at least quarterly and as needed in order to minimize risk for fall incidents and/or injury. The facility policy and procedure entitled Fall Risk Assessment dated 8/2020…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications (R20). The facility was administering psychotropic medications to R20, but no behaviors were being monitored to assure the medications effectiveness. Findings include: R20 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Dementia without behavioral disturbance. A review of R20's Individual plan of care noted: R20 is receiving antidepressant medications, Lexapro and Imipramine, antipsychotic medication, Aripiprazole to manage depressive symptoms and anxiousness related to diagnosis of Depression and Anxiety Disorder, unspecified. Date Initiated 11/4/2022. Interventions included: o Will show no adverse side effects of psychotropic medication regimen through next review. o Will show a decrease in depressive symptoms and anxiety through next review. o Assess/record effectiveness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-27 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the required posted information was displayed. This was observed in main areas and all 6 units, This had the potential to effect all 117 residents in the facility. The facility did not display the following information: -A list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit; and (ii) A statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property in the facility, and non-compliance with the advanced directives. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$397,046 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $59,670 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
- $197,769 — penalty dated 2025-06-23
- $42,532 — penalty dated 2025-04-14
- $33,830 — penalty dated 2024-12-03
- $63,245 — penalty dated 2024-03-27
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-08 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE ALDEN GROUP, LTD. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2010 |
| THE FLOYD A. SCHLOSSBERG LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| ELISCO, ARIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| ELISCO, AUDRA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| ELISCO, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| MAGNUSSON, GARRETT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| MAGNUSSON, LAUREN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| MAGNUSSON, PAIGE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, NICOLE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2013 |
| SCHULLO, RANDI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/16/2010 |
| BODALSKI, GERARD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/12/2018 |
| CARL, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2010 |
| SCHLOSSBERG, FLOYD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2010 |
| ALDEN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| DAVIS, ESTHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/15/2010 |
| MOLITOR, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/02/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525271. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.