Alden Des Plaines Rehab & Hc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 322 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 86.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall preventive measures for a resident who is a 2 person transfer assist due to limited mobility due to surgical site. This deficiency affects one (R1) of three residents reviewed for Falls prevention program. This failure resulted in R1 to have dislocation of the right hip prosthesis requiring hospitalization. Findings include:R1 is an [AGE] year-old with the following diagnosis: periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, history of falling, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, anemia, orthostatic hypotension, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, polymyalgia rheumatica, presence of right artificial hip joint. Facility Reported Incident dated 11/24/25 documents during the transfer from toilet to wheelchair, R1 experienced sudden weakness in his right leg and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls. This failure affected one (R4) of four residents reviewed for falls and resulted in R4 experiencing an unwitnessed fall which resulted in a nasal fracture. Findings include: R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Left humerus fracture (status post fall), dementia, weakness, and lack of coordination. On admission, Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents that R4 has severe cognitive impairment and according to notes, was non-verbal, and hard of hearing. Fall incident reports were reviewed relating to R4 experiencing three unwitnessed falls in the facility on 8/26/24, 9/9/24, and 10/10/24. 8/26/24 incident report notes at 12:40 pm a nurse on duty heard a noise and rushed to the dining room. R4 was found on the floor in the dining room laying on R4's back and left side. The nurse notes that just five minutes prior, R4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement effective interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of falling for residents with history of fall and assessed to require extensive assistance for toileting. This affected two of three residents (R6, R5) reviewed for fall prevention interventions. This failure resulted in R6 falling at night while attempting to self-transfer to commode and sustaining a left comminuted and displaced hip fracture requiring surgical intervention. Findings include: 1. On 11/17/23 at 11:25 AM, this surveyor observed R6 lying in bed with eyes closed. R6 had a floor mat on the right side of bed between the bed and wall. The floor mat for the left side of the bed was folded in half and leaning against the wall. On 11/21/23 at 12:07 PM, R6 stated that R6 fell in R6's room on Friday, 10/20/23, around 8:00-9:00 PM. R6 stated that she was going to use her commode and the commode was half on the floor and half on the floor mat. R6 stated that the commode was uneven and she lost her balance and fell. R6 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician's order during administration of pain medication (Hydrocodone Acetaminophen) for one (R1) of four residents in the sample four reviewed for medication.Findings include:R1 is [AGE] year-old female, admitted in the facility on 02/16/26 with diagnoses of Other Displaced Fracture of Upper End of Left Humerus, Subsequent Encounter for Fracture with Nonunion; Presence of Left Artificial Shoulder Joint; and Encounter for Change or Removal of Surgical Wound Dressing. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/23/26 recorded R1's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score was 13, which means little to no impairment in cognition.R1's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documented the following:05/04/26: Hydrocodone Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for severe pain (7-10) (max 3gm acetaminophen/day from all sources).05/04/26: Hydrocodone Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325mg (milligrams) give 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide needed care and services in accordance with resident's plan of care, facility's protocol, and professional standard of practice. This deficiency affects one (R1) of three residents reviewed for Quality of care. Findings include: On 9/16/25 at 1:15PM, V4 Insurance Case manager said that she visited R1 last week and presented to her his concerns that last month, he was being helped into bed by CNA and during the transfer, his right foot got caught under the bed and has been having foot pain since. R1 said that the CNA does not know what he is doing. V4 is concern with resident safe transfer. R1 has a right foot bandage. V4 spoke with Agency nurse and told her that R1's toes have ulceration and receiving antibiotics for cellulitis. V4 said that she did not follow up her concern with nursing management and social service in the facility. On 9/16/25 at 9:59AM, Observed R1 up in wheelchair in his room. He is alert and oriented x3. He can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for clothing change and incontinence care received those services for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. Findings include:On 9/2/2025 at 10:30am V6(Agency Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said that on 7/30/2025 at about 6:30am V7(Nurse) asked V6 to clean up R1 and do incontinence care because he was going out to the hospital. V6 said upon entering the room the smell of emesis, feces and urine was observed. R1 had dried and new emesis with red fluid on his gown, upon removing the top linen R1 had feces and urine soaked on the bed with dried urine and feces rings on the bottom sheet and a red penis, scrotum and buttocks. V6 said she questioned V7 about why R1 was in this condition, V7 said the CNA for R1 had left the facility before she could tell her to clean R1.On 9/2/2025 at 11:40am this writer, V3(Assistant Director of Nursing -ADON), and V5(Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) observed R1 in the bed with a soiled gown, red…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Storage/ Labeling/ Packaging of Medications Policy by failing to remove 1 bottle of expired medication dated 6/2025. This failure has the capacity to affect 15 residents who receive medications from the 3rd floor cart #1. Findings include: On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, surveyor and V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed 1 medication bottle with expiration date of 6/2025 on the 3rd floor cart 1. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said this medication is expired and should be removed based on expiration date (6/2025). On [DATE] at 2:05 PM, V11 (Registered Nurse - Pharmacy Consultant) said best practice would be to remove the medication on [DATE]. V11 said she is not aware of any resident currently using this medication. On [DATE] at 2:04 PM, V12 (Pharmacist) said best practice would be to remove the medication on 6-1-2025. On [DATE] at 8:42 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said the significance of the expiration date affects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and maintain a copy of the hospice coordinated care plan for one of two residents (R12) reviewed for hospice care in a sample of 22. Findings include:R12 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted in the facility on 01/01/2025 under hospice care with diagnoses of not limited to thalassemia minor, generalized muscle weakness and dependence on oxygen. On 07/22/2025 at 10:35AM during record review with V5 (Assistant Director of Nursing), R12's coordinated plan of care was not on the hospice binder or the scanned documents of R12's electronic health record. On 07/23/2025 at 10:15AM during record review with V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse), R12's coordinated plan of care was not on the hospice binder or the scanned documents of R12's electronic health record. On 07/23/2025 at 10:24AM during record review with V7 (Social Service Director), R12's coordinated plan of care was not on the hospice binder or the scanned documents of R12's electronic health record.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress devices were on the correct weight setting for residents who are assessed to be at risk for developing pressure injuries. This deficient practice affects three (R12, R38 and R43) out of four residents reviewed for pressure injury prevention and treatment in a final sample of 22 residents. Findings Include: R12 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted in the facility on 01/01/2025 under hospice care with diagnoses of not limited to thalassemia minor, generalized muscle weakness and dependence on oxygen. On 07/22/2025 at 9:55AM during unit rounds, R12 had flat sheet and disposable pad underneath her while wearing disposable briefs. R12 was lying on low air loss mattress with setting noted at level 7. On 07/22/2025 at 11:15AM during observation with V5 (Assistant Director of Nursing), R12 was again noted with flat sheet and disposable pad underneath her while wearing disposable briefs. R12 was again lying on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its mechanical lift transfer policy by not having two people assist to a resident transfer. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 22. The findings include:R31 is a [AGE] year-old female having moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]. The MDS also documents that R31 is dependent on transferring from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair) and vice versa. On 07/22/2025 at 1:56 PM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was transferring R31 from chair to bed by herself. On 7/22/25 at 1:58 PM, V9 stated, The other CNA stepped out to get something. I am sorry, I shouldn't have transferred the resident by myself. 07/23/2025 2:59 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, The mechanical lift transfer requires two people for safe transfer. V9 should have another staff member to assist with the resident transfer. A review of the mechanical transfer care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its intravenous (IV) care guidelines by not changing the IV dressing as needed. This applies to 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R225) for IV catheter care in a sample of 22. The Findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old female with mild cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 07/22/2025 at 11:33 AM, R1 was observed with a left upper arm peripheral IV line with a dirty dressing with dry blood around the insertion site, and the tape was peeling off from the bottom. On 07/22/2025 at 11:33 AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, R1 is getting daily IV antibiotic for the surgical site infection in her back. The dressing should have been changed as the dressing was coming off, and the insertion site was dry with blood. On 07/23/2025 2:59 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, The nurses are supposed to change the IV dressing when the dressing is peeling off or having an insertion site with dry blood. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their ongoing infection surveillance for one of five residents (R4) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 22. Findings include:R4 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted in the facility on 05/23/2025 with diagnoses of not limited to benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, incontinence without sensory awareness, and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase resistance. During record review, R4 had Infection Screening Evaluation dated 07/21/2025 which indicated that R4 presented with urinary frequency and urinary urgency, and Infection Analysis of Suspected UTI (urinary tract infection) without indwelling catheter. R4's Order Summary Report dated 07/23/2025 indicated R4 is on contact precautions for ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) urine with order date of 07/21/2025. On 07/23/2025 at 11:50AM during record review with V2 (Interim Director of Nursing/DON), and V5 (Assistant DON), with V8 (previous DON) on the phone for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care to dependent residents in a timely manner. This deficiency affects two (R1 and R4) of three residents reviewed for Activity of daily Living (ADL)-Incontinence care. Findings include: R1 On 5/13/25 at 10:20AM, Surveyor requested skin assessment for R1. Observed V5 WCN (Wound Care Nurse) and V10 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) repositioned R1 to side lying position. Observed disposable brief soaked with urine and leaked through the cloth pad underneath her. Observed V10 provided incontinence care to R1. Observed V10 did not change her gloves after cleaning peri anal area and sacral area of R1. V10 took clean disposable brief and applied to R1 with the same gloves. On 5/13/25 at 10:22AM, V11 Agency CNA said that he is assigned to both R1 and R4. V11 said that he has not provided incontinence care or morning care to both residents. V5 WCN said that CNAs should check dependent resident for incontinence every 2 hours.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,893 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $28,893 — penalty dated 2024-09-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL